+ All Categories
Home > Documents > JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer...

JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer...

Date post: 25-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
51
V DONALD T. GOLDBERG WILLIAM S. ZOINO JOSEPH D GUERTIN, JR. JOHN E. AYRES \Yj3i. 'i/'-t^« III,, I ,,_ MATTHEW J. BARVENIK ozv WILLIAM R. BELOFF NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA, JR. MATHEW A. DIPILATO CARL EIDAM LAWRENCE FELDMAN GOLDBERG ZOINO S. ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL-GEOHYDROLOGICAL CONSULTANTS JOSEPH P HEHIR ROBERT A. HELLER ROSS T McGILLIVRAY MICHAEL A. POWERS JAMES H. REYNOLDS PAUL M. SANBORN RICHARD M. SIMON STEVEN J. TRETTEL CONSULTANTS WALTER E. JAWORSKI, JR. STANLEY M. BEMBEN VITO A. NACCI FRANK W. CLARK, RE. DISTRICT MANAGER October 15, 1987 File No. C-30027.14- Mr. David D. Dorocz R.I. Solid Waste Management Corporation 260 West Exchange Street Providence, RI 02903 Re: Central Landfill RI/FS Progress Report 5 Work Period September 11, 1987 to October 11, 1987 Dear Mr. Dorocz: This letter report serves as the fifth progress report prepared by Goldberg-Zoino & Associates, Inc, (GZA) associated with activities completed to date on the Central Landfill Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS). This progress report has been prepared in accordance with the provision of section 6.20 of the February 1985 Work Plan prepared by GZA. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, GOLDBERG-ZOINO & ASSOCIATES, INC. /^y^:^yL>^ p. Hartley / Project Manager / JPH:lam Attachment Copyright 1987 Goldberg-Zoino & Associates, Inc. 140 BROADWAY » PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND 02903 » (401) 421-4140 NEWTON UPPER FALLS, MA « BUFFALO, NY • BRIDGEPORT CT « VERNON, CT • MANCHESTER, NH AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Transcript
Page 1: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

V DONALD T GOLDBERG WILLIAM S ZOINO JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR JOHN E AYRES Yj3i i - t^laquo I I I I _ MATTHEW J BARVENIK ozv WILLIAM R BELOFF NICHOLAS A CAMPAGNA JR MATHEW A DIPILATO CARL EIDAM LAWRENCE FELDMAN

G O L D B E R G bull ZOINO S A S S O C I A T E S INC G E O T E C H N I C A L - G E O H Y D R O L O G I C A L C O N S U L T A N T S JOSEPH P HEHIR

ROBERT A HELLER ROSS T McGILLIVRAY MICHAEL A POWERS JAMES H REYNOLDS PAUL M SANBORN RICHARD M SIMON STEVEN J TRETTEL

CONSULTANTS

WALTER E JAWORSKI JR STANLEY M BEMBEN VITO A NACCI

FRANK W CLARK RE DISTRICT MANAGER

October 15 1987 File No C-3002714shy

Mr David D Dorocz RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 260 West Exchange Street Providence RI 02903

Re Central Landfill RIFS Progress Report 5 Work Period September 11 1987 to October 11 1987

Dear Mr Dorocz

This letter report serves as the fifth progress report prepared by Goldberg-Zoino amp Associates Inc (GZA) associated with activities completed to date on the Central Landfill Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS) This progress report has been prepared in accordance with the provision of section 620 of the February 1985 Work Plan prepared by GZA

Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to call me

Very truly yours

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

^ y ^ ^ y L gt ^ p Hartley

Project Manager

JPHlam Attachment

Copyright 1987 Goldberg-Zoino amp Associates Inc

140 BROADWAY raquo PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND 02903 raquo (401) 421-4140 NEWTON UPPER FALLS MA laquo BUFFALO NY bull BRIDGEPORT CT laquo VERNON CT bull MANCHESTER NH

AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER

I ^

KEY PERSONNEL CHANGES

The GZA project team has not changed since submission of the first progress report Michael A Powers remains as Associateshyin-Charge John P Hartley services as Project Manager and Site Safety Officer Edward A Summerly and Norbert J Schulz presently serves as lead project engineers

GZX

ANTICIPATED PROBLEMSUNRESOLVED ISSUES

1) GZA awaits EPA formal comments on air monitoring plan

2)

3)

GZA awaits EPA formal comments on sampling plan

GZA awaits schedule and scope of work for USGSgeophysical effort

down-hole

4) GZA awaits FS work plan from Wehren Engineering

UPCOMING EVENTSACTIVITIES PLANNED

EVENTACTIVITY

1) WE 87 ML-4 Boring

2) WE 87 ML-3 Boring

3) WE 87-13 Boring

4) Test Pit Explorations

5) VSP Work

6) Multilevel Sampler Installation

7) Surface WaterSediment Sampling

8) Groundwater Sampling

ANTICIPATED START DATE (WEEK OF)

October 18

November 1

November 1 (Dependent on Availability of Drill Rig)

November 8

November 15

November 22

November 22

November 22

GZX

PROGRESS MADE THIS REPORTING PERIOD

1) Meeting is held on September 10 1987 at the Central Landfill to discuss and field reconnaissance the locations of the five multi-level wells Present at the meeting were Ken Wenger and John Zannos (EPA) David Dorocz (RISWMC) Mark Brickie (CDM) John Hartley and Edward Summerly (GZA) the original intent of the meeting was to field locate the multi-level wells based on local topographical features ie outcrops distinct topographical depression etc At the completion of the effort it was recognized that such features are not readily apparent at the site Accordingly a mutual agreement was reached to locate the wells based on URI geophysicalfracture trace work and to proceed with this approach until URI could be contacted to address rationale for their selection of well locations (Note since that time numerous calls made by EPA and GZA to reach Dr Frolich have been unsuccessful)

2) Well installation completed during this drilling period is as follows

Guild commenced drilling at borehole location WE87-ML2 on September 14 1987 using the air percussion method Bedrock was encountered at 15 feet(+) and was drilled to a depth of 155 feet The borehole was then pressure tested and developed between September 28 and October 1 All equipment was then steam cleaned on October 2 1987 Guild commenced drilling borehole WE87-ML1 on October 5 using the air percussion method Bedrock was encountered at 21 feet ( + ) and was drilled to a depth of 210 feet The borehole was then pressure tested on October 14 and 15 AH equipment was then steam cleaned and moved to borehole location WE87-ML5 on October 15

Guild Drilling Co commenced drilling at borehole location WE87-4 on August 17 1987 Bedrock was encountered at 15 feet ( + ) and was cored to a depth of 4 6 feet The borehole was pressure tested and one observation well was installed to a depth of 36 feet and sealed in rock on August 21 All equipment was then steam cleaned prior to beginning the next borehole

GZA Drilling Inc arrived back on-site on September 15 1987 to begin drilling in the former hazardous waste disposal area Drilling on borehole location WE87-1A commenced on September 15 and was terminated at a depth of 3 3 feet (+) on October 18 The borehole was terminated due to the subsurface conditions which were different from those anticipated in the closure area

On September 18 19 87 Mr Summerly and Mr Doorley located the center of the closure area based upon a plan titled Hazardous Waste Area Closing by C E Maquire dated September 1981 This new location was designated WE87-1B and drilling at this location was begun on September 21 1987 Bedrock was encountered at 367 feet (+) and was drilled to a depth of 53 feet and then cored to a depth of 68 feet

Two observation wells were installed at this location between September 28 and 30 Well WE87-1B-B was installed to a depth of 67 feet and sealed in bedrock Well WE87-1B-A was installed to a depth of 368 feet in fill material The remainder of the borehole was then sealed using a bentonite grout

Borehole WE87-1C was performed approximately 20 feet to the southeast of location WE87-1B on September 30 1987 Soils at this location were sampled continuously down from the surface in an attempt to recover a sample of the PVC cap material A sample of this material was recovered from a depth of 77 feet (plusmn) Based upon a discussion between Mr Ken Wenger and Mr Hartley this borehole was terminated at a depth of 8 feet and sealed with bentonite grout on October 1 1987 GZA Drilling Inc left the site on October 1 1987 after steam cleaning all equipment

3) On September 22 1987 Mr Ralph L Gumpert an industrial hygienist with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) conducted an unannounced inspection of the CLF WE87-1 drilling activities The inspection resulted in verbal comments present by OSHA to GZAs field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZAs two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency communication devices

4) September 22 1987 meeting is held with Wehren Engineering GZA subcontractor responsible for preparation of the feasibility study to discuss the project and scope of work Wehren is currently preparing an FS work plan and is developing contract documents for GZAs review

5) Several problems associated with the drilling effort were encountered On September 23 1987 GZA spoke with Ken Wenger about these problems and to agree upon a solution

RIAL and GZA personnel had begun development of landfill well WE87-3 using a submissible air lift pump At the completion of this effort after removing at least the volume of water introduced to the well during packer testing it was realized the well had significantly shifted because of landfill operations conducted in the near vicinity of the well After repeated efforts over several days to remove the pump it was successfully removed from the well This experience made it obvious that the real potential exists for loosing this well because of significant well movement and potential breakage of the casing Accordingly GZA requested EPAs verbal comments andor approval of GZAs proposed sampling plan so that groundwater samples could be collected from all landfill wells as soon as possible to avoid the risk of eventual well loss EPA was informed that GZA and RIAL will proceed with well sampling the next week using the proposed plan unless we hear otherwise EPA was agreeable to this approach but suggested we contact CDM to determine status of their plan review On September 24 1987 GZA contacted CDM T Pederson was not in at that time On September 25 1987 CDM

returned phone call at which time it was noted that the sampling plan had not been review GZA presented their concerns over well shifting and potential problems CDM agreed and committed to present comments by the following week

The second drilling issue that emerged during this period involved drilling on the former hazardous waste disposal area (WE87-1) The location of this boring was selected based on recommendations made Jim Doorley (RISWMC) based his best recollection of the locations of the hazardous waste trenches relative to the capped area Observations made while drilling at the location resulted in the determination that the boring was most likely not within the capped portion of the waste cell At the same time RISWMC provided GZA with a copy of a closure plan prepared for the RISWMC by C E Maguire (copy enclosed)

Based on a map showing the location of the waste cell in that closure plan GZA relocated the WE87-1 boring to the approximate center of the apparent capped area This information was presented to EPA during our September 23 1987 phone conversation

6) On September 25 1987 GZA spoke with John Zannos (EPA) regarding EPAs position concerning the use of drilling foam during the advancement of the multi-level wells The use of foam had been suggested by Guild Drilling Co to help remove rock fragments in the wells which result in lower drilling rates EPAs position with regard to the use of foam were (1) it could not be used (2) foaming agents often contain organic constituents and (3) can only be used if we risk loosing the hole and only after EPA approval GZA acknowledged position and transferred information to Guild Drilling

7) On September 30 1987 another drilling issue emerged with regard to drilling at the WE87-1 location Following the completion of drilling and installation of sampling wells at this location GZA moved the drill rig approximately 20 feet to the south of the WE87-1 boring in order to more accurately assess surface conditions within the capped area ie the presence of fly ash (Note this intensive sampling effort was beyond the agreed upon approach which involved sampling at 5-foot intervals until fly ash material was encountered for 10 feet) At a depth of approximately 77 feet the liner material was encountered This observation supports observed condition in WE87-1 suggesting that we have successfully installed a well within the capped region of site GZA does not suggest that it was determined that the well is placed within a former disposal trench since this was not the primary objective of this effort and not part of GZAs Scope of Work or Work Plan Recommendations were made to GZA by CDM to continue drilling at this location to bedrock The objective of this recommendation was not presented GZA did not agree with this approach since it essentially commits us to an additional week of drilling without a clear objective Accordingly the hole was terminated at approximately 77 feet

and grout filled This information and GZAs approach was presented to RISWMC and EPA Both parties agreed with our approach EPA committed that if warranted they may require GZA to return to this area to perform additional testing GZA acknowledged with the understanding that additional drilling activities are outside the present Scope of Work and therefore must result in contractual consent agreemervE) and schedule modifications TTT bullmdash

8) GZA reviewed RIDOH residential well sampling data this reporting period and began incorporation of this data along with the EPACDM residential well results onto a survey map which indicates location of sampling points well status (activeinactive) and the current or planned status of the Johnston water supply lines Of cruciai significance in this effort is the fact that the RIDOH sampling location are relative only ie street name without address number This hampers GZAs efforts in accurately assessing potential seeks off-site impacts and therefore we seek EPAs assistance in obtaining more detailed information

9) On October 14 1987 GZA returned a call to John Zannos (EPA) at which time information relative to drilling status was presented John presented concerns over drilling efforts at the WE87-1 location based on CDMs comments Although the specifics were not known it was discussed that GZA may not have been proceeding with agreed upon approach GZA noted that they felt they had and sought to resolve any outstanding issues It was agreed to talk about perceived problems at the upcoming October 23 1987 meeting EPA also noted concern over size of borehole (multi-level wells) which may make them incompatible with Waterloo systems EPA suggested that EPA contact Weston Geophysical to perform caliper logging measurements prior to ordering Waterloo system GZA agreed

10) Air monitoring was initiated at the site also during this period The air sampling was conductance in accordance with GZA revised air monitoring plan and based on verbal comments presented to GZA from CDM The air monitoring effort involved the collection of air samples upwind and downwind of the WE87-1 drilling location during and subsequent to drilling In addition to the preliminary air monitoring effort which was designed to address logistical and analytical considerations four additional rounds have or will be completed at the site

GZX

PROBLEMS RESOLVED

1) GZA receives RIDOH residential well sampling data

GZX

V

DATE INSTALLED ^ ^ ^ f ^ ^ ^ T J ^ J PRmFCT z^^^ t^^ ^^ c y y y^7=s LOCATION

GZAENGIMFFR ^ f ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ gt ^ X ^ ^ mMTRATTnP

BORING Wo U7pound f t - tG FILE No C^QOHt- lR

y i ^ r c ^ y i

(S^ ZA 7 gt - y SZT^i^

WEATHER mKiniTinM ^ - y ^ cy ^ npii ^ FR y i ^ h u i y j ^ ^ ^ v T c K

REMARKS A U y 7 E l Q U R M pound y V 7 ^ A R ^ 7=-y0Z

A D e p ^ h -fc o p a - f

tn

o H 3 J 3 EvroAOT^

(SPOUT o UJ

oc

CO 03

CO

u o 211 gtshycc lt QepToATre

PPLLET 5 pound A L

CO

7 8 ^

Asyli

- T P P O r 6 U A f lt D P X P ^

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

bullPROTECTIVE CASING ^ - i

bull1-12 SCHO 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE SAND BflCKOLL

BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (QOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO S C M X

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ss DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT r 9 i H y

cOLOBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

cc

BORING Mn 7Z7poundf^7-77i FILE No r-laquo^gr^ DATE INSTALLED f ^ f - ^ ^ -30 - ^7

PROJECT Sf in ^^^^oA PXPS LOCATION L^^ J ylty ^ zeuro^

GZA EhiGlNFFR P^^y S i ^ ^ - ^ Z Y y CONTRACTOR G Z A lt^^^^-^^ 3^^ C

WEATHER rrgtMrgtiTinMlt C7ea r ^70 6 DRILLER A r 7 ^ c z r - ^ ^ ^ s lt7 ^

REMARKS yU7ZlBji^TpoundZyAdpoundAZP^ A Y j P =^^crAA P i c^Z^ S6ZZIZ^P Z^-PPz^

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

I bullPROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE

CO bullz o Q

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ AP j ^ y - ^ ^ ^ o PAlt5P J Plt07

D ^ P A t L S CO bull r iNC to COAnOC G A N D BACKnLL CO My CO

u o gtshyQ BP^PaTTPPP BOREHOLE lt PP L(PP

ID CO HHlt

i2^ bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

1-12 SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

686 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

696^m bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING Aij 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 67 Z z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

WELL N a r y i f ^ - ^ 4 BORING Wo 7J7E2 FILE No C - 3 0 0 Z t t ^ DATE raquoMlaquoTAiiFn ^ - r - ^ - f 6 - P 7

PROJECT C g n f r d I k lt ^ r d - f t l f ^ p S LOCATION

GZA ENGINEER ^ ^ y G u m z n e l y y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A O ^ i i i i n Q XL DS^ WEATHER CONDITIONS C g ^ ^ ^ 8 o S HRII FR X gt ^ tn J ^ P e i r r y REMARKS ALL AAf^ASURrvXeAZPS Ay(P POM P O P O P ( P U A P O y^J7PB

bullGROUND SURFACE

Dejcih -i-o op o f CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL

P V C - O J e A - y i o s h (TYPICALLY 05 THICK)

U^ell Q^posh PROTECrriVE CASING ^ TVPP ^ I T E E L S X H S 6 g ^ f o y i ^ 4rr ^ y ^ r e

p y CO

S e a cuf y4gt 7ltir t7

E 1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

6 y t f ^ ^ a ^00 ^ o UJ y^O 3 47^i7S a bull if 7^ ir o lt SSA7ro 7srz^

CO CpoundMe^ZT bull glMS tQ COARSE SAND BACKF1UU CQ

GlRouT

Q a p p iTo)( traquo^4 y r 7 y

bullBOREHOLE P 6 7

QpoundArrozrr^ Z3 7gt^LL e r CO II

67 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I-12SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (001 SLDTS)

77 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCMX

jpMym

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING J ^ A P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT _ ^ i Z l

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

i^Z^ WELL N a ^ ^ ^ r V ^ BORING Ho AlpoundAl lA-FILE No C-^ltgt(^7-7^ DATE INSTALLED 8 S 8 7 - ^ lt S - 8 7

PROJECT Cezii^c^ l L ^ ^ o 7 A 7 P P ^ S LOCATION John^-f^on 1 PXshyGZA FNfiiMFFR Po S o t raquo ^ e r y C0NTR5CT0R GZA 0^77^^ nc WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl^lt^Y^ S ^ DRILLER - Pe i - f ^y shyZ^yai^CREMARKS bull

QO DEPTH C GROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

-PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE j

CO

o Q

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE oo LJ I a- 7 t 5 e e P a ^ e I cr CO P o r bull FINE lto COARSE SAND aOiCKFILL CQ O e a i l s ID CO 7 u P J i - r e f i o gtshy

-BOREHOLE cc lt Pop OP ROCK 7^2 s

6 PAL CO 76 Z

782 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 9 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

33J BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN S i l jReyroAjrpound pet-ter- SpoundAL ^ 2ycr2e^c^__yoz_7i

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING T P A P L

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 8 2 y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

Thgr ltp7 ^

bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3

FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7

PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP

GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^

WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P

GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION

O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs

UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H

2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y

r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7

Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ

t tr ^ A bull T X V pound

yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO

980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE

lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L

CO 3

m^ j m j

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B

BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7

PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT

K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc

WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE

CO

O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I

L3

LU f o r O e - h a i l s O

if CC

YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt

dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer

CO SfAplusmn37o

J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN

3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z

S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7

PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X

GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co

WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY

o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06

PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P

CO z o p yio

H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3

111

t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt

S ^ A L 3 CO yo

230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)

OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0

GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7

PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R

GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)

l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo

TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s

Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO

O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito

H Q

rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ ^^7ropxpP

p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt

s CO 67

M TOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

lt

CO z o p 3

i j j

a r) CO CQ Z) CO

gtbull a lt 2

CO

DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V

PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp

WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^

REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA

lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^

p p e - 72^

SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L

786

206

BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^

TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn

Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri

T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^

CGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL

-BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC

7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2

DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX

GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7

p d P OP Floe^

CO

O Ishy5 2 0 shy

bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

CJ

UJ

t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T

5poundAt^ 29 q

3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC

WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ

DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c

60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^

REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound

g o DEPTH

ELEVATION

_ pound GROUND SURFICE

I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC

CONCRETE(TYPICALLY

SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)

73PPFOAXrp SEAL

SloL 70

bull bull bull

I bullPROTE

TYPE

ECTIVE CASING bdquo

CO

o

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

C_)

LJ

t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

t l 2S2 O

gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302

322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2

P-^^ nP I ^

WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^

DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72

PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J

GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o

WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

o - t P V C i r o m

f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE Sree^L y x

V

CO

o 70

1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL

bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO

u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO

100

Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

NOTE NOT TO SCALt

vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC

y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19

Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i

ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^

Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O

SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L

CO

o

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

u UJ

t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r

S P A L

CO 3

3 ^

361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)

s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P

S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Jvj-iw-fili

IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A

EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N

^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull

^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^

CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

FOR

RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA

Prepared for the

RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

OCTOBER 1981

CE MAGUIRE INC

PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND

Architects bull Engineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI

October 5 1981 CEM 3869

Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903

Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill

Dear Mr Delfino

In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area

The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing

We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects

Very truly yours

CE MAGUIRE INC

Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager

Enclosure

CMPdw

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

1 INTRODUCTION

2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK

3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX

TABLE NO TITLE

HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

FIGURE NO TITLE

1 LOCATION MAP

2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS

ATTACHMENTS

TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP

BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

FINAL GRADING PLAN

PAGE

1

5

9

PAGE

6

8

PAGE

2

11

DRAWING NO

1

2

3

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 2: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

I ^

KEY PERSONNEL CHANGES

The GZA project team has not changed since submission of the first progress report Michael A Powers remains as Associateshyin-Charge John P Hartley services as Project Manager and Site Safety Officer Edward A Summerly and Norbert J Schulz presently serves as lead project engineers

GZX

ANTICIPATED PROBLEMSUNRESOLVED ISSUES

1) GZA awaits EPA formal comments on air monitoring plan

2)

3)

GZA awaits EPA formal comments on sampling plan

GZA awaits schedule and scope of work for USGSgeophysical effort

down-hole

4) GZA awaits FS work plan from Wehren Engineering

UPCOMING EVENTSACTIVITIES PLANNED

EVENTACTIVITY

1) WE 87 ML-4 Boring

2) WE 87 ML-3 Boring

3) WE 87-13 Boring

4) Test Pit Explorations

5) VSP Work

6) Multilevel Sampler Installation

7) Surface WaterSediment Sampling

8) Groundwater Sampling

ANTICIPATED START DATE (WEEK OF)

October 18

November 1

November 1 (Dependent on Availability of Drill Rig)

November 8

November 15

November 22

November 22

November 22

GZX

PROGRESS MADE THIS REPORTING PERIOD

1) Meeting is held on September 10 1987 at the Central Landfill to discuss and field reconnaissance the locations of the five multi-level wells Present at the meeting were Ken Wenger and John Zannos (EPA) David Dorocz (RISWMC) Mark Brickie (CDM) John Hartley and Edward Summerly (GZA) the original intent of the meeting was to field locate the multi-level wells based on local topographical features ie outcrops distinct topographical depression etc At the completion of the effort it was recognized that such features are not readily apparent at the site Accordingly a mutual agreement was reached to locate the wells based on URI geophysicalfracture trace work and to proceed with this approach until URI could be contacted to address rationale for their selection of well locations (Note since that time numerous calls made by EPA and GZA to reach Dr Frolich have been unsuccessful)

2) Well installation completed during this drilling period is as follows

Guild commenced drilling at borehole location WE87-ML2 on September 14 1987 using the air percussion method Bedrock was encountered at 15 feet(+) and was drilled to a depth of 155 feet The borehole was then pressure tested and developed between September 28 and October 1 All equipment was then steam cleaned on October 2 1987 Guild commenced drilling borehole WE87-ML1 on October 5 using the air percussion method Bedrock was encountered at 21 feet ( + ) and was drilled to a depth of 210 feet The borehole was then pressure tested on October 14 and 15 AH equipment was then steam cleaned and moved to borehole location WE87-ML5 on October 15

Guild Drilling Co commenced drilling at borehole location WE87-4 on August 17 1987 Bedrock was encountered at 15 feet ( + ) and was cored to a depth of 4 6 feet The borehole was pressure tested and one observation well was installed to a depth of 36 feet and sealed in rock on August 21 All equipment was then steam cleaned prior to beginning the next borehole

GZA Drilling Inc arrived back on-site on September 15 1987 to begin drilling in the former hazardous waste disposal area Drilling on borehole location WE87-1A commenced on September 15 and was terminated at a depth of 3 3 feet (+) on October 18 The borehole was terminated due to the subsurface conditions which were different from those anticipated in the closure area

On September 18 19 87 Mr Summerly and Mr Doorley located the center of the closure area based upon a plan titled Hazardous Waste Area Closing by C E Maquire dated September 1981 This new location was designated WE87-1B and drilling at this location was begun on September 21 1987 Bedrock was encountered at 367 feet (+) and was drilled to a depth of 53 feet and then cored to a depth of 68 feet

Two observation wells were installed at this location between September 28 and 30 Well WE87-1B-B was installed to a depth of 67 feet and sealed in bedrock Well WE87-1B-A was installed to a depth of 368 feet in fill material The remainder of the borehole was then sealed using a bentonite grout

Borehole WE87-1C was performed approximately 20 feet to the southeast of location WE87-1B on September 30 1987 Soils at this location were sampled continuously down from the surface in an attempt to recover a sample of the PVC cap material A sample of this material was recovered from a depth of 77 feet (plusmn) Based upon a discussion between Mr Ken Wenger and Mr Hartley this borehole was terminated at a depth of 8 feet and sealed with bentonite grout on October 1 1987 GZA Drilling Inc left the site on October 1 1987 after steam cleaning all equipment

3) On September 22 1987 Mr Ralph L Gumpert an industrial hygienist with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) conducted an unannounced inspection of the CLF WE87-1 drilling activities The inspection resulted in verbal comments present by OSHA to GZAs field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZAs two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency communication devices

4) September 22 1987 meeting is held with Wehren Engineering GZA subcontractor responsible for preparation of the feasibility study to discuss the project and scope of work Wehren is currently preparing an FS work plan and is developing contract documents for GZAs review

5) Several problems associated with the drilling effort were encountered On September 23 1987 GZA spoke with Ken Wenger about these problems and to agree upon a solution

RIAL and GZA personnel had begun development of landfill well WE87-3 using a submissible air lift pump At the completion of this effort after removing at least the volume of water introduced to the well during packer testing it was realized the well had significantly shifted because of landfill operations conducted in the near vicinity of the well After repeated efforts over several days to remove the pump it was successfully removed from the well This experience made it obvious that the real potential exists for loosing this well because of significant well movement and potential breakage of the casing Accordingly GZA requested EPAs verbal comments andor approval of GZAs proposed sampling plan so that groundwater samples could be collected from all landfill wells as soon as possible to avoid the risk of eventual well loss EPA was informed that GZA and RIAL will proceed with well sampling the next week using the proposed plan unless we hear otherwise EPA was agreeable to this approach but suggested we contact CDM to determine status of their plan review On September 24 1987 GZA contacted CDM T Pederson was not in at that time On September 25 1987 CDM

returned phone call at which time it was noted that the sampling plan had not been review GZA presented their concerns over well shifting and potential problems CDM agreed and committed to present comments by the following week

The second drilling issue that emerged during this period involved drilling on the former hazardous waste disposal area (WE87-1) The location of this boring was selected based on recommendations made Jim Doorley (RISWMC) based his best recollection of the locations of the hazardous waste trenches relative to the capped area Observations made while drilling at the location resulted in the determination that the boring was most likely not within the capped portion of the waste cell At the same time RISWMC provided GZA with a copy of a closure plan prepared for the RISWMC by C E Maguire (copy enclosed)

Based on a map showing the location of the waste cell in that closure plan GZA relocated the WE87-1 boring to the approximate center of the apparent capped area This information was presented to EPA during our September 23 1987 phone conversation

6) On September 25 1987 GZA spoke with John Zannos (EPA) regarding EPAs position concerning the use of drilling foam during the advancement of the multi-level wells The use of foam had been suggested by Guild Drilling Co to help remove rock fragments in the wells which result in lower drilling rates EPAs position with regard to the use of foam were (1) it could not be used (2) foaming agents often contain organic constituents and (3) can only be used if we risk loosing the hole and only after EPA approval GZA acknowledged position and transferred information to Guild Drilling

7) On September 30 1987 another drilling issue emerged with regard to drilling at the WE87-1 location Following the completion of drilling and installation of sampling wells at this location GZA moved the drill rig approximately 20 feet to the south of the WE87-1 boring in order to more accurately assess surface conditions within the capped area ie the presence of fly ash (Note this intensive sampling effort was beyond the agreed upon approach which involved sampling at 5-foot intervals until fly ash material was encountered for 10 feet) At a depth of approximately 77 feet the liner material was encountered This observation supports observed condition in WE87-1 suggesting that we have successfully installed a well within the capped region of site GZA does not suggest that it was determined that the well is placed within a former disposal trench since this was not the primary objective of this effort and not part of GZAs Scope of Work or Work Plan Recommendations were made to GZA by CDM to continue drilling at this location to bedrock The objective of this recommendation was not presented GZA did not agree with this approach since it essentially commits us to an additional week of drilling without a clear objective Accordingly the hole was terminated at approximately 77 feet

and grout filled This information and GZAs approach was presented to RISWMC and EPA Both parties agreed with our approach EPA committed that if warranted they may require GZA to return to this area to perform additional testing GZA acknowledged with the understanding that additional drilling activities are outside the present Scope of Work and therefore must result in contractual consent agreemervE) and schedule modifications TTT bullmdash

8) GZA reviewed RIDOH residential well sampling data this reporting period and began incorporation of this data along with the EPACDM residential well results onto a survey map which indicates location of sampling points well status (activeinactive) and the current or planned status of the Johnston water supply lines Of cruciai significance in this effort is the fact that the RIDOH sampling location are relative only ie street name without address number This hampers GZAs efforts in accurately assessing potential seeks off-site impacts and therefore we seek EPAs assistance in obtaining more detailed information

9) On October 14 1987 GZA returned a call to John Zannos (EPA) at which time information relative to drilling status was presented John presented concerns over drilling efforts at the WE87-1 location based on CDMs comments Although the specifics were not known it was discussed that GZA may not have been proceeding with agreed upon approach GZA noted that they felt they had and sought to resolve any outstanding issues It was agreed to talk about perceived problems at the upcoming October 23 1987 meeting EPA also noted concern over size of borehole (multi-level wells) which may make them incompatible with Waterloo systems EPA suggested that EPA contact Weston Geophysical to perform caliper logging measurements prior to ordering Waterloo system GZA agreed

10) Air monitoring was initiated at the site also during this period The air sampling was conductance in accordance with GZA revised air monitoring plan and based on verbal comments presented to GZA from CDM The air monitoring effort involved the collection of air samples upwind and downwind of the WE87-1 drilling location during and subsequent to drilling In addition to the preliminary air monitoring effort which was designed to address logistical and analytical considerations four additional rounds have or will be completed at the site

GZX

PROBLEMS RESOLVED

1) GZA receives RIDOH residential well sampling data

GZX

V

DATE INSTALLED ^ ^ ^ f ^ ^ ^ T J ^ J PRmFCT z^^^ t^^ ^^ c y y y^7=s LOCATION

GZAENGIMFFR ^ f ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ gt ^ X ^ ^ mMTRATTnP

BORING Wo U7pound f t - tG FILE No C^QOHt- lR

y i ^ r c ^ y i

(S^ ZA 7 gt - y SZT^i^

WEATHER mKiniTinM ^ - y ^ cy ^ npii ^ FR y i ^ h u i y j ^ ^ ^ v T c K

REMARKS A U y 7 E l Q U R M pound y V 7 ^ A R ^ 7=-y0Z

A D e p ^ h -fc o p a - f

tn

o H 3 J 3 EvroAOT^

(SPOUT o UJ

oc

CO 03

CO

u o 211 gtshycc lt QepToATre

PPLLET 5 pound A L

CO

7 8 ^

Asyli

- T P P O r 6 U A f lt D P X P ^

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

bullPROTECTIVE CASING ^ - i

bull1-12 SCHO 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE SAND BflCKOLL

BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (QOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO S C M X

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ss DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT r 9 i H y

cOLOBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

cc

BORING Mn 7Z7poundf^7-77i FILE No r-laquo^gr^ DATE INSTALLED f ^ f - ^ ^ -30 - ^7

PROJECT Sf in ^^^^oA PXPS LOCATION L^^ J ylty ^ zeuro^

GZA EhiGlNFFR P^^y S i ^ ^ - ^ Z Y y CONTRACTOR G Z A lt^^^^-^^ 3^^ C

WEATHER rrgtMrgtiTinMlt C7ea r ^70 6 DRILLER A r 7 ^ c z r - ^ ^ ^ s lt7 ^

REMARKS yU7ZlBji^TpoundZyAdpoundAZP^ A Y j P =^^crAA P i c^Z^ S6ZZIZ^P Z^-PPz^

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

I bullPROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE

CO bullz o Q

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ AP j ^ y - ^ ^ ^ o PAlt5P J Plt07

D ^ P A t L S CO bull r iNC to COAnOC G A N D BACKnLL CO My CO

u o gtshyQ BP^PaTTPPP BOREHOLE lt PP L(PP

ID CO HHlt

i2^ bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

1-12 SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

686 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

696^m bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING Aij 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 67 Z z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

WELL N a r y i f ^ - ^ 4 BORING Wo 7J7E2 FILE No C - 3 0 0 Z t t ^ DATE raquoMlaquoTAiiFn ^ - r - ^ - f 6 - P 7

PROJECT C g n f r d I k lt ^ r d - f t l f ^ p S LOCATION

GZA ENGINEER ^ ^ y G u m z n e l y y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A O ^ i i i i n Q XL DS^ WEATHER CONDITIONS C g ^ ^ ^ 8 o S HRII FR X gt ^ tn J ^ P e i r r y REMARKS ALL AAf^ASURrvXeAZPS Ay(P POM P O P O P ( P U A P O y^J7PB

bullGROUND SURFACE

Dejcih -i-o op o f CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL

P V C - O J e A - y i o s h (TYPICALLY 05 THICK)

U^ell Q^posh PROTECrriVE CASING ^ TVPP ^ I T E E L S X H S 6 g ^ f o y i ^ 4rr ^ y ^ r e

p y CO

S e a cuf y4gt 7ltir t7

E 1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

6 y t f ^ ^ a ^00 ^ o UJ y^O 3 47^i7S a bull if 7^ ir o lt SSA7ro 7srz^

CO CpoundMe^ZT bull glMS tQ COARSE SAND BACKF1UU CQ

GlRouT

Q a p p iTo)( traquo^4 y r 7 y

bullBOREHOLE P 6 7

QpoundArrozrr^ Z3 7gt^LL e r CO II

67 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I-12SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (001 SLDTS)

77 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCMX

jpMym

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING J ^ A P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT _ ^ i Z l

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

i^Z^ WELL N a ^ ^ ^ r V ^ BORING Ho AlpoundAl lA-FILE No C-^ltgt(^7-7^ DATE INSTALLED 8 S 8 7 - ^ lt S - 8 7

PROJECT Cezii^c^ l L ^ ^ o 7 A 7 P P ^ S LOCATION John^-f^on 1 PXshyGZA FNfiiMFFR Po S o t raquo ^ e r y C0NTR5CT0R GZA 0^77^^ nc WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl^lt^Y^ S ^ DRILLER - Pe i - f ^y shyZ^yai^CREMARKS bull

QO DEPTH C GROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

-PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE j

CO

o Q

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE oo LJ I a- 7 t 5 e e P a ^ e I cr CO P o r bull FINE lto COARSE SAND aOiCKFILL CQ O e a i l s ID CO 7 u P J i - r e f i o gtshy

-BOREHOLE cc lt Pop OP ROCK 7^2 s

6 PAL CO 76 Z

782 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 9 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

33J BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN S i l jReyroAjrpound pet-ter- SpoundAL ^ 2ycr2e^c^__yoz_7i

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING T P A P L

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 8 2 y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

Thgr ltp7 ^

bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3

FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7

PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP

GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^

WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P

GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION

O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs

UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H

2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y

r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7

Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ

t tr ^ A bull T X V pound

yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO

980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE

lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L

CO 3

m^ j m j

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B

BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7

PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT

K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc

WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE

CO

O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I

L3

LU f o r O e - h a i l s O

if CC

YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt

dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer

CO SfAplusmn37o

J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN

3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z

S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7

PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X

GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co

WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY

o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06

PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P

CO z o p yio

H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3

111

t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt

S ^ A L 3 CO yo

230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)

OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0

GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7

PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R

GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)

l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo

TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s

Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO

O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito

H Q

rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ ^^7ropxpP

p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt

s CO 67

M TOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

lt

CO z o p 3

i j j

a r) CO CQ Z) CO

gtbull a lt 2

CO

DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V

PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp

WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^

REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA

lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^

p p e - 72^

SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L

786

206

BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^

TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn

Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri

T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^

CGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL

-BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC

7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2

DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX

GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7

p d P OP Floe^

CO

O Ishy5 2 0 shy

bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

CJ

UJ

t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T

5poundAt^ 29 q

3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC

WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ

DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c

60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^

REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound

g o DEPTH

ELEVATION

_ pound GROUND SURFICE

I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC

CONCRETE(TYPICALLY

SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)

73PPFOAXrp SEAL

SloL 70

bull bull bull

I bullPROTE

TYPE

ECTIVE CASING bdquo

CO

o

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

C_)

LJ

t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

t l 2S2 O

gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302

322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2

P-^^ nP I ^

WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^

DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72

PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J

GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o

WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

o - t P V C i r o m

f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE Sree^L y x

V

CO

o 70

1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL

bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO

u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO

100

Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

NOTE NOT TO SCALt

vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC

y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19

Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i

ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^

Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O

SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L

CO

o

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

u UJ

t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r

S P A L

CO 3

3 ^

361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)

s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P

S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Jvj-iw-fili

IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A

EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N

^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull

^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^

CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

FOR

RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA

Prepared for the

RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

OCTOBER 1981

CE MAGUIRE INC

PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND

Architects bull Engineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI

October 5 1981 CEM 3869

Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903

Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill

Dear Mr Delfino

In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area

The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing

We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects

Very truly yours

CE MAGUIRE INC

Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager

Enclosure

CMPdw

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

1 INTRODUCTION

2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK

3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX

TABLE NO TITLE

HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

FIGURE NO TITLE

1 LOCATION MAP

2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS

ATTACHMENTS

TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP

BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

FINAL GRADING PLAN

PAGE

1

5

9

PAGE

6

8

PAGE

2

11

DRAWING NO

1

2

3

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 3: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

ANTICIPATED PROBLEMSUNRESOLVED ISSUES

1) GZA awaits EPA formal comments on air monitoring plan

2)

3)

GZA awaits EPA formal comments on sampling plan

GZA awaits schedule and scope of work for USGSgeophysical effort

down-hole

4) GZA awaits FS work plan from Wehren Engineering

UPCOMING EVENTSACTIVITIES PLANNED

EVENTACTIVITY

1) WE 87 ML-4 Boring

2) WE 87 ML-3 Boring

3) WE 87-13 Boring

4) Test Pit Explorations

5) VSP Work

6) Multilevel Sampler Installation

7) Surface WaterSediment Sampling

8) Groundwater Sampling

ANTICIPATED START DATE (WEEK OF)

October 18

November 1

November 1 (Dependent on Availability of Drill Rig)

November 8

November 15

November 22

November 22

November 22

GZX

PROGRESS MADE THIS REPORTING PERIOD

1) Meeting is held on September 10 1987 at the Central Landfill to discuss and field reconnaissance the locations of the five multi-level wells Present at the meeting were Ken Wenger and John Zannos (EPA) David Dorocz (RISWMC) Mark Brickie (CDM) John Hartley and Edward Summerly (GZA) the original intent of the meeting was to field locate the multi-level wells based on local topographical features ie outcrops distinct topographical depression etc At the completion of the effort it was recognized that such features are not readily apparent at the site Accordingly a mutual agreement was reached to locate the wells based on URI geophysicalfracture trace work and to proceed with this approach until URI could be contacted to address rationale for their selection of well locations (Note since that time numerous calls made by EPA and GZA to reach Dr Frolich have been unsuccessful)

2) Well installation completed during this drilling period is as follows

Guild commenced drilling at borehole location WE87-ML2 on September 14 1987 using the air percussion method Bedrock was encountered at 15 feet(+) and was drilled to a depth of 155 feet The borehole was then pressure tested and developed between September 28 and October 1 All equipment was then steam cleaned on October 2 1987 Guild commenced drilling borehole WE87-ML1 on October 5 using the air percussion method Bedrock was encountered at 21 feet ( + ) and was drilled to a depth of 210 feet The borehole was then pressure tested on October 14 and 15 AH equipment was then steam cleaned and moved to borehole location WE87-ML5 on October 15

Guild Drilling Co commenced drilling at borehole location WE87-4 on August 17 1987 Bedrock was encountered at 15 feet ( + ) and was cored to a depth of 4 6 feet The borehole was pressure tested and one observation well was installed to a depth of 36 feet and sealed in rock on August 21 All equipment was then steam cleaned prior to beginning the next borehole

GZA Drilling Inc arrived back on-site on September 15 1987 to begin drilling in the former hazardous waste disposal area Drilling on borehole location WE87-1A commenced on September 15 and was terminated at a depth of 3 3 feet (+) on October 18 The borehole was terminated due to the subsurface conditions which were different from those anticipated in the closure area

On September 18 19 87 Mr Summerly and Mr Doorley located the center of the closure area based upon a plan titled Hazardous Waste Area Closing by C E Maquire dated September 1981 This new location was designated WE87-1B and drilling at this location was begun on September 21 1987 Bedrock was encountered at 367 feet (+) and was drilled to a depth of 53 feet and then cored to a depth of 68 feet

Two observation wells were installed at this location between September 28 and 30 Well WE87-1B-B was installed to a depth of 67 feet and sealed in bedrock Well WE87-1B-A was installed to a depth of 368 feet in fill material The remainder of the borehole was then sealed using a bentonite grout

Borehole WE87-1C was performed approximately 20 feet to the southeast of location WE87-1B on September 30 1987 Soils at this location were sampled continuously down from the surface in an attempt to recover a sample of the PVC cap material A sample of this material was recovered from a depth of 77 feet (plusmn) Based upon a discussion between Mr Ken Wenger and Mr Hartley this borehole was terminated at a depth of 8 feet and sealed with bentonite grout on October 1 1987 GZA Drilling Inc left the site on October 1 1987 after steam cleaning all equipment

3) On September 22 1987 Mr Ralph L Gumpert an industrial hygienist with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) conducted an unannounced inspection of the CLF WE87-1 drilling activities The inspection resulted in verbal comments present by OSHA to GZAs field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZAs two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency communication devices

4) September 22 1987 meeting is held with Wehren Engineering GZA subcontractor responsible for preparation of the feasibility study to discuss the project and scope of work Wehren is currently preparing an FS work plan and is developing contract documents for GZAs review

5) Several problems associated with the drilling effort were encountered On September 23 1987 GZA spoke with Ken Wenger about these problems and to agree upon a solution

RIAL and GZA personnel had begun development of landfill well WE87-3 using a submissible air lift pump At the completion of this effort after removing at least the volume of water introduced to the well during packer testing it was realized the well had significantly shifted because of landfill operations conducted in the near vicinity of the well After repeated efforts over several days to remove the pump it was successfully removed from the well This experience made it obvious that the real potential exists for loosing this well because of significant well movement and potential breakage of the casing Accordingly GZA requested EPAs verbal comments andor approval of GZAs proposed sampling plan so that groundwater samples could be collected from all landfill wells as soon as possible to avoid the risk of eventual well loss EPA was informed that GZA and RIAL will proceed with well sampling the next week using the proposed plan unless we hear otherwise EPA was agreeable to this approach but suggested we contact CDM to determine status of their plan review On September 24 1987 GZA contacted CDM T Pederson was not in at that time On September 25 1987 CDM

returned phone call at which time it was noted that the sampling plan had not been review GZA presented their concerns over well shifting and potential problems CDM agreed and committed to present comments by the following week

The second drilling issue that emerged during this period involved drilling on the former hazardous waste disposal area (WE87-1) The location of this boring was selected based on recommendations made Jim Doorley (RISWMC) based his best recollection of the locations of the hazardous waste trenches relative to the capped area Observations made while drilling at the location resulted in the determination that the boring was most likely not within the capped portion of the waste cell At the same time RISWMC provided GZA with a copy of a closure plan prepared for the RISWMC by C E Maguire (copy enclosed)

Based on a map showing the location of the waste cell in that closure plan GZA relocated the WE87-1 boring to the approximate center of the apparent capped area This information was presented to EPA during our September 23 1987 phone conversation

6) On September 25 1987 GZA spoke with John Zannos (EPA) regarding EPAs position concerning the use of drilling foam during the advancement of the multi-level wells The use of foam had been suggested by Guild Drilling Co to help remove rock fragments in the wells which result in lower drilling rates EPAs position with regard to the use of foam were (1) it could not be used (2) foaming agents often contain organic constituents and (3) can only be used if we risk loosing the hole and only after EPA approval GZA acknowledged position and transferred information to Guild Drilling

7) On September 30 1987 another drilling issue emerged with regard to drilling at the WE87-1 location Following the completion of drilling and installation of sampling wells at this location GZA moved the drill rig approximately 20 feet to the south of the WE87-1 boring in order to more accurately assess surface conditions within the capped area ie the presence of fly ash (Note this intensive sampling effort was beyond the agreed upon approach which involved sampling at 5-foot intervals until fly ash material was encountered for 10 feet) At a depth of approximately 77 feet the liner material was encountered This observation supports observed condition in WE87-1 suggesting that we have successfully installed a well within the capped region of site GZA does not suggest that it was determined that the well is placed within a former disposal trench since this was not the primary objective of this effort and not part of GZAs Scope of Work or Work Plan Recommendations were made to GZA by CDM to continue drilling at this location to bedrock The objective of this recommendation was not presented GZA did not agree with this approach since it essentially commits us to an additional week of drilling without a clear objective Accordingly the hole was terminated at approximately 77 feet

and grout filled This information and GZAs approach was presented to RISWMC and EPA Both parties agreed with our approach EPA committed that if warranted they may require GZA to return to this area to perform additional testing GZA acknowledged with the understanding that additional drilling activities are outside the present Scope of Work and therefore must result in contractual consent agreemervE) and schedule modifications TTT bullmdash

8) GZA reviewed RIDOH residential well sampling data this reporting period and began incorporation of this data along with the EPACDM residential well results onto a survey map which indicates location of sampling points well status (activeinactive) and the current or planned status of the Johnston water supply lines Of cruciai significance in this effort is the fact that the RIDOH sampling location are relative only ie street name without address number This hampers GZAs efforts in accurately assessing potential seeks off-site impacts and therefore we seek EPAs assistance in obtaining more detailed information

9) On October 14 1987 GZA returned a call to John Zannos (EPA) at which time information relative to drilling status was presented John presented concerns over drilling efforts at the WE87-1 location based on CDMs comments Although the specifics were not known it was discussed that GZA may not have been proceeding with agreed upon approach GZA noted that they felt they had and sought to resolve any outstanding issues It was agreed to talk about perceived problems at the upcoming October 23 1987 meeting EPA also noted concern over size of borehole (multi-level wells) which may make them incompatible with Waterloo systems EPA suggested that EPA contact Weston Geophysical to perform caliper logging measurements prior to ordering Waterloo system GZA agreed

10) Air monitoring was initiated at the site also during this period The air sampling was conductance in accordance with GZA revised air monitoring plan and based on verbal comments presented to GZA from CDM The air monitoring effort involved the collection of air samples upwind and downwind of the WE87-1 drilling location during and subsequent to drilling In addition to the preliminary air monitoring effort which was designed to address logistical and analytical considerations four additional rounds have or will be completed at the site

GZX

PROBLEMS RESOLVED

1) GZA receives RIDOH residential well sampling data

GZX

V

DATE INSTALLED ^ ^ ^ f ^ ^ ^ T J ^ J PRmFCT z^^^ t^^ ^^ c y y y^7=s LOCATION

GZAENGIMFFR ^ f ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ gt ^ X ^ ^ mMTRATTnP

BORING Wo U7pound f t - tG FILE No C^QOHt- lR

y i ^ r c ^ y i

(S^ ZA 7 gt - y SZT^i^

WEATHER mKiniTinM ^ - y ^ cy ^ npii ^ FR y i ^ h u i y j ^ ^ ^ v T c K

REMARKS A U y 7 E l Q U R M pound y V 7 ^ A R ^ 7=-y0Z

A D e p ^ h -fc o p a - f

tn

o H 3 J 3 EvroAOT^

(SPOUT o UJ

oc

CO 03

CO

u o 211 gtshycc lt QepToATre

PPLLET 5 pound A L

CO

7 8 ^

Asyli

- T P P O r 6 U A f lt D P X P ^

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

bullPROTECTIVE CASING ^ - i

bull1-12 SCHO 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE SAND BflCKOLL

BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (QOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO S C M X

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ss DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT r 9 i H y

cOLOBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

cc

BORING Mn 7Z7poundf^7-77i FILE No r-laquo^gr^ DATE INSTALLED f ^ f - ^ ^ -30 - ^7

PROJECT Sf in ^^^^oA PXPS LOCATION L^^ J ylty ^ zeuro^

GZA EhiGlNFFR P^^y S i ^ ^ - ^ Z Y y CONTRACTOR G Z A lt^^^^-^^ 3^^ C

WEATHER rrgtMrgtiTinMlt C7ea r ^70 6 DRILLER A r 7 ^ c z r - ^ ^ ^ s lt7 ^

REMARKS yU7ZlBji^TpoundZyAdpoundAZP^ A Y j P =^^crAA P i c^Z^ S6ZZIZ^P Z^-PPz^

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

I bullPROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE

CO bullz o Q

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ AP j ^ y - ^ ^ ^ o PAlt5P J Plt07

D ^ P A t L S CO bull r iNC to COAnOC G A N D BACKnLL CO My CO

u o gtshyQ BP^PaTTPPP BOREHOLE lt PP L(PP

ID CO HHlt

i2^ bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

1-12 SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

686 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

696^m bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING Aij 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 67 Z z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

WELL N a r y i f ^ - ^ 4 BORING Wo 7J7E2 FILE No C - 3 0 0 Z t t ^ DATE raquoMlaquoTAiiFn ^ - r - ^ - f 6 - P 7

PROJECT C g n f r d I k lt ^ r d - f t l f ^ p S LOCATION

GZA ENGINEER ^ ^ y G u m z n e l y y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A O ^ i i i i n Q XL DS^ WEATHER CONDITIONS C g ^ ^ ^ 8 o S HRII FR X gt ^ tn J ^ P e i r r y REMARKS ALL AAf^ASURrvXeAZPS Ay(P POM P O P O P ( P U A P O y^J7PB

bullGROUND SURFACE

Dejcih -i-o op o f CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL

P V C - O J e A - y i o s h (TYPICALLY 05 THICK)

U^ell Q^posh PROTECrriVE CASING ^ TVPP ^ I T E E L S X H S 6 g ^ f o y i ^ 4rr ^ y ^ r e

p y CO

S e a cuf y4gt 7ltir t7

E 1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

6 y t f ^ ^ a ^00 ^ o UJ y^O 3 47^i7S a bull if 7^ ir o lt SSA7ro 7srz^

CO CpoundMe^ZT bull glMS tQ COARSE SAND BACKF1UU CQ

GlRouT

Q a p p iTo)( traquo^4 y r 7 y

bullBOREHOLE P 6 7

QpoundArrozrr^ Z3 7gt^LL e r CO II

67 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I-12SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (001 SLDTS)

77 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCMX

jpMym

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING J ^ A P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT _ ^ i Z l

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

i^Z^ WELL N a ^ ^ ^ r V ^ BORING Ho AlpoundAl lA-FILE No C-^ltgt(^7-7^ DATE INSTALLED 8 S 8 7 - ^ lt S - 8 7

PROJECT Cezii^c^ l L ^ ^ o 7 A 7 P P ^ S LOCATION John^-f^on 1 PXshyGZA FNfiiMFFR Po S o t raquo ^ e r y C0NTR5CT0R GZA 0^77^^ nc WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl^lt^Y^ S ^ DRILLER - Pe i - f ^y shyZ^yai^CREMARKS bull

QO DEPTH C GROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

-PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE j

CO

o Q

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE oo LJ I a- 7 t 5 e e P a ^ e I cr CO P o r bull FINE lto COARSE SAND aOiCKFILL CQ O e a i l s ID CO 7 u P J i - r e f i o gtshy

-BOREHOLE cc lt Pop OP ROCK 7^2 s

6 PAL CO 76 Z

782 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 9 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

33J BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN S i l jReyroAjrpound pet-ter- SpoundAL ^ 2ycr2e^c^__yoz_7i

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING T P A P L

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 8 2 y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

Thgr ltp7 ^

bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3

FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7

PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP

GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^

WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P

GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION

O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs

UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H

2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y

r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7

Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ

t tr ^ A bull T X V pound

yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO

980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE

lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L

CO 3

m^ j m j

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B

BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7

PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT

K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc

WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE

CO

O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I

L3

LU f o r O e - h a i l s O

if CC

YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt

dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer

CO SfAplusmn37o

J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN

3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z

S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7

PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X

GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co

WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY

o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06

PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P

CO z o p yio

H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3

111

t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt

S ^ A L 3 CO yo

230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)

OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0

GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7

PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R

GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)

l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo

TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s

Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO

O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito

H Q

rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ ^^7ropxpP

p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt

s CO 67

M TOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

lt

CO z o p 3

i j j

a r) CO CQ Z) CO

gtbull a lt 2

CO

DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V

PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp

WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^

REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA

lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^

p p e - 72^

SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L

786

206

BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^

TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn

Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri

T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^

CGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL

-BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC

7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2

DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX

GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7

p d P OP Floe^

CO

O Ishy5 2 0 shy

bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

CJ

UJ

t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T

5poundAt^ 29 q

3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC

WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ

DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c

60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^

REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound

g o DEPTH

ELEVATION

_ pound GROUND SURFICE

I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC

CONCRETE(TYPICALLY

SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)

73PPFOAXrp SEAL

SloL 70

bull bull bull

I bullPROTE

TYPE

ECTIVE CASING bdquo

CO

o

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

C_)

LJ

t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

t l 2S2 O

gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302

322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2

P-^^ nP I ^

WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^

DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72

PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J

GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o

WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

o - t P V C i r o m

f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE Sree^L y x

V

CO

o 70

1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL

bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO

u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO

100

Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

NOTE NOT TO SCALt

vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC

y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19

Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i

ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^

Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O

SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L

CO

o

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

u UJ

t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r

S P A L

CO 3

3 ^

361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)

s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P

S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Jvj-iw-fili

IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A

EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N

^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull

^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^

CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

FOR

RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA

Prepared for the

RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

OCTOBER 1981

CE MAGUIRE INC

PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND

Architects bull Engineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI

October 5 1981 CEM 3869

Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903

Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill

Dear Mr Delfino

In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area

The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing

We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects

Very truly yours

CE MAGUIRE INC

Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager

Enclosure

CMPdw

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

1 INTRODUCTION

2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK

3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX

TABLE NO TITLE

HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

FIGURE NO TITLE

1 LOCATION MAP

2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS

ATTACHMENTS

TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP

BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

FINAL GRADING PLAN

PAGE

1

5

9

PAGE

6

8

PAGE

2

11

DRAWING NO

1

2

3

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 4: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

UPCOMING EVENTSACTIVITIES PLANNED

EVENTACTIVITY

1) WE 87 ML-4 Boring

2) WE 87 ML-3 Boring

3) WE 87-13 Boring

4) Test Pit Explorations

5) VSP Work

6) Multilevel Sampler Installation

7) Surface WaterSediment Sampling

8) Groundwater Sampling

ANTICIPATED START DATE (WEEK OF)

October 18

November 1

November 1 (Dependent on Availability of Drill Rig)

November 8

November 15

November 22

November 22

November 22

GZX

PROGRESS MADE THIS REPORTING PERIOD

1) Meeting is held on September 10 1987 at the Central Landfill to discuss and field reconnaissance the locations of the five multi-level wells Present at the meeting were Ken Wenger and John Zannos (EPA) David Dorocz (RISWMC) Mark Brickie (CDM) John Hartley and Edward Summerly (GZA) the original intent of the meeting was to field locate the multi-level wells based on local topographical features ie outcrops distinct topographical depression etc At the completion of the effort it was recognized that such features are not readily apparent at the site Accordingly a mutual agreement was reached to locate the wells based on URI geophysicalfracture trace work and to proceed with this approach until URI could be contacted to address rationale for their selection of well locations (Note since that time numerous calls made by EPA and GZA to reach Dr Frolich have been unsuccessful)

2) Well installation completed during this drilling period is as follows

Guild commenced drilling at borehole location WE87-ML2 on September 14 1987 using the air percussion method Bedrock was encountered at 15 feet(+) and was drilled to a depth of 155 feet The borehole was then pressure tested and developed between September 28 and October 1 All equipment was then steam cleaned on October 2 1987 Guild commenced drilling borehole WE87-ML1 on October 5 using the air percussion method Bedrock was encountered at 21 feet ( + ) and was drilled to a depth of 210 feet The borehole was then pressure tested on October 14 and 15 AH equipment was then steam cleaned and moved to borehole location WE87-ML5 on October 15

Guild Drilling Co commenced drilling at borehole location WE87-4 on August 17 1987 Bedrock was encountered at 15 feet ( + ) and was cored to a depth of 4 6 feet The borehole was pressure tested and one observation well was installed to a depth of 36 feet and sealed in rock on August 21 All equipment was then steam cleaned prior to beginning the next borehole

GZA Drilling Inc arrived back on-site on September 15 1987 to begin drilling in the former hazardous waste disposal area Drilling on borehole location WE87-1A commenced on September 15 and was terminated at a depth of 3 3 feet (+) on October 18 The borehole was terminated due to the subsurface conditions which were different from those anticipated in the closure area

On September 18 19 87 Mr Summerly and Mr Doorley located the center of the closure area based upon a plan titled Hazardous Waste Area Closing by C E Maquire dated September 1981 This new location was designated WE87-1B and drilling at this location was begun on September 21 1987 Bedrock was encountered at 367 feet (+) and was drilled to a depth of 53 feet and then cored to a depth of 68 feet

Two observation wells were installed at this location between September 28 and 30 Well WE87-1B-B was installed to a depth of 67 feet and sealed in bedrock Well WE87-1B-A was installed to a depth of 368 feet in fill material The remainder of the borehole was then sealed using a bentonite grout

Borehole WE87-1C was performed approximately 20 feet to the southeast of location WE87-1B on September 30 1987 Soils at this location were sampled continuously down from the surface in an attempt to recover a sample of the PVC cap material A sample of this material was recovered from a depth of 77 feet (plusmn) Based upon a discussion between Mr Ken Wenger and Mr Hartley this borehole was terminated at a depth of 8 feet and sealed with bentonite grout on October 1 1987 GZA Drilling Inc left the site on October 1 1987 after steam cleaning all equipment

3) On September 22 1987 Mr Ralph L Gumpert an industrial hygienist with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) conducted an unannounced inspection of the CLF WE87-1 drilling activities The inspection resulted in verbal comments present by OSHA to GZAs field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZAs two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency communication devices

4) September 22 1987 meeting is held with Wehren Engineering GZA subcontractor responsible for preparation of the feasibility study to discuss the project and scope of work Wehren is currently preparing an FS work plan and is developing contract documents for GZAs review

5) Several problems associated with the drilling effort were encountered On September 23 1987 GZA spoke with Ken Wenger about these problems and to agree upon a solution

RIAL and GZA personnel had begun development of landfill well WE87-3 using a submissible air lift pump At the completion of this effort after removing at least the volume of water introduced to the well during packer testing it was realized the well had significantly shifted because of landfill operations conducted in the near vicinity of the well After repeated efforts over several days to remove the pump it was successfully removed from the well This experience made it obvious that the real potential exists for loosing this well because of significant well movement and potential breakage of the casing Accordingly GZA requested EPAs verbal comments andor approval of GZAs proposed sampling plan so that groundwater samples could be collected from all landfill wells as soon as possible to avoid the risk of eventual well loss EPA was informed that GZA and RIAL will proceed with well sampling the next week using the proposed plan unless we hear otherwise EPA was agreeable to this approach but suggested we contact CDM to determine status of their plan review On September 24 1987 GZA contacted CDM T Pederson was not in at that time On September 25 1987 CDM

returned phone call at which time it was noted that the sampling plan had not been review GZA presented their concerns over well shifting and potential problems CDM agreed and committed to present comments by the following week

The second drilling issue that emerged during this period involved drilling on the former hazardous waste disposal area (WE87-1) The location of this boring was selected based on recommendations made Jim Doorley (RISWMC) based his best recollection of the locations of the hazardous waste trenches relative to the capped area Observations made while drilling at the location resulted in the determination that the boring was most likely not within the capped portion of the waste cell At the same time RISWMC provided GZA with a copy of a closure plan prepared for the RISWMC by C E Maguire (copy enclosed)

Based on a map showing the location of the waste cell in that closure plan GZA relocated the WE87-1 boring to the approximate center of the apparent capped area This information was presented to EPA during our September 23 1987 phone conversation

6) On September 25 1987 GZA spoke with John Zannos (EPA) regarding EPAs position concerning the use of drilling foam during the advancement of the multi-level wells The use of foam had been suggested by Guild Drilling Co to help remove rock fragments in the wells which result in lower drilling rates EPAs position with regard to the use of foam were (1) it could not be used (2) foaming agents often contain organic constituents and (3) can only be used if we risk loosing the hole and only after EPA approval GZA acknowledged position and transferred information to Guild Drilling

7) On September 30 1987 another drilling issue emerged with regard to drilling at the WE87-1 location Following the completion of drilling and installation of sampling wells at this location GZA moved the drill rig approximately 20 feet to the south of the WE87-1 boring in order to more accurately assess surface conditions within the capped area ie the presence of fly ash (Note this intensive sampling effort was beyond the agreed upon approach which involved sampling at 5-foot intervals until fly ash material was encountered for 10 feet) At a depth of approximately 77 feet the liner material was encountered This observation supports observed condition in WE87-1 suggesting that we have successfully installed a well within the capped region of site GZA does not suggest that it was determined that the well is placed within a former disposal trench since this was not the primary objective of this effort and not part of GZAs Scope of Work or Work Plan Recommendations were made to GZA by CDM to continue drilling at this location to bedrock The objective of this recommendation was not presented GZA did not agree with this approach since it essentially commits us to an additional week of drilling without a clear objective Accordingly the hole was terminated at approximately 77 feet

and grout filled This information and GZAs approach was presented to RISWMC and EPA Both parties agreed with our approach EPA committed that if warranted they may require GZA to return to this area to perform additional testing GZA acknowledged with the understanding that additional drilling activities are outside the present Scope of Work and therefore must result in contractual consent agreemervE) and schedule modifications TTT bullmdash

8) GZA reviewed RIDOH residential well sampling data this reporting period and began incorporation of this data along with the EPACDM residential well results onto a survey map which indicates location of sampling points well status (activeinactive) and the current or planned status of the Johnston water supply lines Of cruciai significance in this effort is the fact that the RIDOH sampling location are relative only ie street name without address number This hampers GZAs efforts in accurately assessing potential seeks off-site impacts and therefore we seek EPAs assistance in obtaining more detailed information

9) On October 14 1987 GZA returned a call to John Zannos (EPA) at which time information relative to drilling status was presented John presented concerns over drilling efforts at the WE87-1 location based on CDMs comments Although the specifics were not known it was discussed that GZA may not have been proceeding with agreed upon approach GZA noted that they felt they had and sought to resolve any outstanding issues It was agreed to talk about perceived problems at the upcoming October 23 1987 meeting EPA also noted concern over size of borehole (multi-level wells) which may make them incompatible with Waterloo systems EPA suggested that EPA contact Weston Geophysical to perform caliper logging measurements prior to ordering Waterloo system GZA agreed

10) Air monitoring was initiated at the site also during this period The air sampling was conductance in accordance with GZA revised air monitoring plan and based on verbal comments presented to GZA from CDM The air monitoring effort involved the collection of air samples upwind and downwind of the WE87-1 drilling location during and subsequent to drilling In addition to the preliminary air monitoring effort which was designed to address logistical and analytical considerations four additional rounds have or will be completed at the site

GZX

PROBLEMS RESOLVED

1) GZA receives RIDOH residential well sampling data

GZX

V

DATE INSTALLED ^ ^ ^ f ^ ^ ^ T J ^ J PRmFCT z^^^ t^^ ^^ c y y y^7=s LOCATION

GZAENGIMFFR ^ f ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ gt ^ X ^ ^ mMTRATTnP

BORING Wo U7pound f t - tG FILE No C^QOHt- lR

y i ^ r c ^ y i

(S^ ZA 7 gt - y SZT^i^

WEATHER mKiniTinM ^ - y ^ cy ^ npii ^ FR y i ^ h u i y j ^ ^ ^ v T c K

REMARKS A U y 7 E l Q U R M pound y V 7 ^ A R ^ 7=-y0Z

A D e p ^ h -fc o p a - f

tn

o H 3 J 3 EvroAOT^

(SPOUT o UJ

oc

CO 03

CO

u o 211 gtshycc lt QepToATre

PPLLET 5 pound A L

CO

7 8 ^

Asyli

- T P P O r 6 U A f lt D P X P ^

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

bullPROTECTIVE CASING ^ - i

bull1-12 SCHO 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE SAND BflCKOLL

BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (QOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO S C M X

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ss DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT r 9 i H y

cOLOBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

cc

BORING Mn 7Z7poundf^7-77i FILE No r-laquo^gr^ DATE INSTALLED f ^ f - ^ ^ -30 - ^7

PROJECT Sf in ^^^^oA PXPS LOCATION L^^ J ylty ^ zeuro^

GZA EhiGlNFFR P^^y S i ^ ^ - ^ Z Y y CONTRACTOR G Z A lt^^^^-^^ 3^^ C

WEATHER rrgtMrgtiTinMlt C7ea r ^70 6 DRILLER A r 7 ^ c z r - ^ ^ ^ s lt7 ^

REMARKS yU7ZlBji^TpoundZyAdpoundAZP^ A Y j P =^^crAA P i c^Z^ S6ZZIZ^P Z^-PPz^

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

I bullPROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE

CO bullz o Q

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ AP j ^ y - ^ ^ ^ o PAlt5P J Plt07

D ^ P A t L S CO bull r iNC to COAnOC G A N D BACKnLL CO My CO

u o gtshyQ BP^PaTTPPP BOREHOLE lt PP L(PP

ID CO HHlt

i2^ bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

1-12 SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

686 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

696^m bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING Aij 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 67 Z z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

WELL N a r y i f ^ - ^ 4 BORING Wo 7J7E2 FILE No C - 3 0 0 Z t t ^ DATE raquoMlaquoTAiiFn ^ - r - ^ - f 6 - P 7

PROJECT C g n f r d I k lt ^ r d - f t l f ^ p S LOCATION

GZA ENGINEER ^ ^ y G u m z n e l y y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A O ^ i i i i n Q XL DS^ WEATHER CONDITIONS C g ^ ^ ^ 8 o S HRII FR X gt ^ tn J ^ P e i r r y REMARKS ALL AAf^ASURrvXeAZPS Ay(P POM P O P O P ( P U A P O y^J7PB

bullGROUND SURFACE

Dejcih -i-o op o f CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL

P V C - O J e A - y i o s h (TYPICALLY 05 THICK)

U^ell Q^posh PROTECrriVE CASING ^ TVPP ^ I T E E L S X H S 6 g ^ f o y i ^ 4rr ^ y ^ r e

p y CO

S e a cuf y4gt 7ltir t7

E 1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

6 y t f ^ ^ a ^00 ^ o UJ y^O 3 47^i7S a bull if 7^ ir o lt SSA7ro 7srz^

CO CpoundMe^ZT bull glMS tQ COARSE SAND BACKF1UU CQ

GlRouT

Q a p p iTo)( traquo^4 y r 7 y

bullBOREHOLE P 6 7

QpoundArrozrr^ Z3 7gt^LL e r CO II

67 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I-12SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (001 SLDTS)

77 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCMX

jpMym

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING J ^ A P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT _ ^ i Z l

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

i^Z^ WELL N a ^ ^ ^ r V ^ BORING Ho AlpoundAl lA-FILE No C-^ltgt(^7-7^ DATE INSTALLED 8 S 8 7 - ^ lt S - 8 7

PROJECT Cezii^c^ l L ^ ^ o 7 A 7 P P ^ S LOCATION John^-f^on 1 PXshyGZA FNfiiMFFR Po S o t raquo ^ e r y C0NTR5CT0R GZA 0^77^^ nc WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl^lt^Y^ S ^ DRILLER - Pe i - f ^y shyZ^yai^CREMARKS bull

QO DEPTH C GROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

-PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE j

CO

o Q

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE oo LJ I a- 7 t 5 e e P a ^ e I cr CO P o r bull FINE lto COARSE SAND aOiCKFILL CQ O e a i l s ID CO 7 u P J i - r e f i o gtshy

-BOREHOLE cc lt Pop OP ROCK 7^2 s

6 PAL CO 76 Z

782 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 9 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

33J BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN S i l jReyroAjrpound pet-ter- SpoundAL ^ 2ycr2e^c^__yoz_7i

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING T P A P L

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 8 2 y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

Thgr ltp7 ^

bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3

FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7

PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP

GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^

WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P

GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION

O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs

UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H

2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y

r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7

Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ

t tr ^ A bull T X V pound

yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO

980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE

lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L

CO 3

m^ j m j

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B

BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7

PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT

K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc

WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE

CO

O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I

L3

LU f o r O e - h a i l s O

if CC

YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt

dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer

CO SfAplusmn37o

J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN

3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z

S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7

PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X

GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co

WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY

o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06

PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P

CO z o p yio

H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3

111

t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt

S ^ A L 3 CO yo

230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)

OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0

GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7

PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R

GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)

l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo

TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s

Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO

O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito

H Q

rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ ^^7ropxpP

p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt

s CO 67

M TOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

lt

CO z o p 3

i j j

a r) CO CQ Z) CO

gtbull a lt 2

CO

DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V

PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp

WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^

REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA

lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^

p p e - 72^

SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L

786

206

BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^

TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn

Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri

T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^

CGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL

-BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC

7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2

DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX

GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7

p d P OP Floe^

CO

O Ishy5 2 0 shy

bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

CJ

UJ

t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T

5poundAt^ 29 q

3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC

WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ

DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c

60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^

REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound

g o DEPTH

ELEVATION

_ pound GROUND SURFICE

I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC

CONCRETE(TYPICALLY

SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)

73PPFOAXrp SEAL

SloL 70

bull bull bull

I bullPROTE

TYPE

ECTIVE CASING bdquo

CO

o

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

C_)

LJ

t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

t l 2S2 O

gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302

322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2

P-^^ nP I ^

WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^

DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72

PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J

GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o

WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

o - t P V C i r o m

f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE Sree^L y x

V

CO

o 70

1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL

bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO

u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO

100

Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

NOTE NOT TO SCALt

vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC

y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19

Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i

ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^

Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O

SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L

CO

o

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

u UJ

t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r

S P A L

CO 3

3 ^

361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)

s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P

S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Jvj-iw-fili

IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A

EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N

^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull

^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^

CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

FOR

RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA

Prepared for the

RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

OCTOBER 1981

CE MAGUIRE INC

PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND

Architects bull Engineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI

October 5 1981 CEM 3869

Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903

Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill

Dear Mr Delfino

In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area

The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing

We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects

Very truly yours

CE MAGUIRE INC

Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager

Enclosure

CMPdw

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

1 INTRODUCTION

2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK

3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX

TABLE NO TITLE

HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

FIGURE NO TITLE

1 LOCATION MAP

2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS

ATTACHMENTS

TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP

BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

FINAL GRADING PLAN

PAGE

1

5

9

PAGE

6

8

PAGE

2

11

DRAWING NO

1

2

3

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 5: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

PROGRESS MADE THIS REPORTING PERIOD

1) Meeting is held on September 10 1987 at the Central Landfill to discuss and field reconnaissance the locations of the five multi-level wells Present at the meeting were Ken Wenger and John Zannos (EPA) David Dorocz (RISWMC) Mark Brickie (CDM) John Hartley and Edward Summerly (GZA) the original intent of the meeting was to field locate the multi-level wells based on local topographical features ie outcrops distinct topographical depression etc At the completion of the effort it was recognized that such features are not readily apparent at the site Accordingly a mutual agreement was reached to locate the wells based on URI geophysicalfracture trace work and to proceed with this approach until URI could be contacted to address rationale for their selection of well locations (Note since that time numerous calls made by EPA and GZA to reach Dr Frolich have been unsuccessful)

2) Well installation completed during this drilling period is as follows

Guild commenced drilling at borehole location WE87-ML2 on September 14 1987 using the air percussion method Bedrock was encountered at 15 feet(+) and was drilled to a depth of 155 feet The borehole was then pressure tested and developed between September 28 and October 1 All equipment was then steam cleaned on October 2 1987 Guild commenced drilling borehole WE87-ML1 on October 5 using the air percussion method Bedrock was encountered at 21 feet ( + ) and was drilled to a depth of 210 feet The borehole was then pressure tested on October 14 and 15 AH equipment was then steam cleaned and moved to borehole location WE87-ML5 on October 15

Guild Drilling Co commenced drilling at borehole location WE87-4 on August 17 1987 Bedrock was encountered at 15 feet ( + ) and was cored to a depth of 4 6 feet The borehole was pressure tested and one observation well was installed to a depth of 36 feet and sealed in rock on August 21 All equipment was then steam cleaned prior to beginning the next borehole

GZA Drilling Inc arrived back on-site on September 15 1987 to begin drilling in the former hazardous waste disposal area Drilling on borehole location WE87-1A commenced on September 15 and was terminated at a depth of 3 3 feet (+) on October 18 The borehole was terminated due to the subsurface conditions which were different from those anticipated in the closure area

On September 18 19 87 Mr Summerly and Mr Doorley located the center of the closure area based upon a plan titled Hazardous Waste Area Closing by C E Maquire dated September 1981 This new location was designated WE87-1B and drilling at this location was begun on September 21 1987 Bedrock was encountered at 367 feet (+) and was drilled to a depth of 53 feet and then cored to a depth of 68 feet

Two observation wells were installed at this location between September 28 and 30 Well WE87-1B-B was installed to a depth of 67 feet and sealed in bedrock Well WE87-1B-A was installed to a depth of 368 feet in fill material The remainder of the borehole was then sealed using a bentonite grout

Borehole WE87-1C was performed approximately 20 feet to the southeast of location WE87-1B on September 30 1987 Soils at this location were sampled continuously down from the surface in an attempt to recover a sample of the PVC cap material A sample of this material was recovered from a depth of 77 feet (plusmn) Based upon a discussion between Mr Ken Wenger and Mr Hartley this borehole was terminated at a depth of 8 feet and sealed with bentonite grout on October 1 1987 GZA Drilling Inc left the site on October 1 1987 after steam cleaning all equipment

3) On September 22 1987 Mr Ralph L Gumpert an industrial hygienist with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) conducted an unannounced inspection of the CLF WE87-1 drilling activities The inspection resulted in verbal comments present by OSHA to GZAs field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZAs two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency communication devices

4) September 22 1987 meeting is held with Wehren Engineering GZA subcontractor responsible for preparation of the feasibility study to discuss the project and scope of work Wehren is currently preparing an FS work plan and is developing contract documents for GZAs review

5) Several problems associated with the drilling effort were encountered On September 23 1987 GZA spoke with Ken Wenger about these problems and to agree upon a solution

RIAL and GZA personnel had begun development of landfill well WE87-3 using a submissible air lift pump At the completion of this effort after removing at least the volume of water introduced to the well during packer testing it was realized the well had significantly shifted because of landfill operations conducted in the near vicinity of the well After repeated efforts over several days to remove the pump it was successfully removed from the well This experience made it obvious that the real potential exists for loosing this well because of significant well movement and potential breakage of the casing Accordingly GZA requested EPAs verbal comments andor approval of GZAs proposed sampling plan so that groundwater samples could be collected from all landfill wells as soon as possible to avoid the risk of eventual well loss EPA was informed that GZA and RIAL will proceed with well sampling the next week using the proposed plan unless we hear otherwise EPA was agreeable to this approach but suggested we contact CDM to determine status of their plan review On September 24 1987 GZA contacted CDM T Pederson was not in at that time On September 25 1987 CDM

returned phone call at which time it was noted that the sampling plan had not been review GZA presented their concerns over well shifting and potential problems CDM agreed and committed to present comments by the following week

The second drilling issue that emerged during this period involved drilling on the former hazardous waste disposal area (WE87-1) The location of this boring was selected based on recommendations made Jim Doorley (RISWMC) based his best recollection of the locations of the hazardous waste trenches relative to the capped area Observations made while drilling at the location resulted in the determination that the boring was most likely not within the capped portion of the waste cell At the same time RISWMC provided GZA with a copy of a closure plan prepared for the RISWMC by C E Maguire (copy enclosed)

Based on a map showing the location of the waste cell in that closure plan GZA relocated the WE87-1 boring to the approximate center of the apparent capped area This information was presented to EPA during our September 23 1987 phone conversation

6) On September 25 1987 GZA spoke with John Zannos (EPA) regarding EPAs position concerning the use of drilling foam during the advancement of the multi-level wells The use of foam had been suggested by Guild Drilling Co to help remove rock fragments in the wells which result in lower drilling rates EPAs position with regard to the use of foam were (1) it could not be used (2) foaming agents often contain organic constituents and (3) can only be used if we risk loosing the hole and only after EPA approval GZA acknowledged position and transferred information to Guild Drilling

7) On September 30 1987 another drilling issue emerged with regard to drilling at the WE87-1 location Following the completion of drilling and installation of sampling wells at this location GZA moved the drill rig approximately 20 feet to the south of the WE87-1 boring in order to more accurately assess surface conditions within the capped area ie the presence of fly ash (Note this intensive sampling effort was beyond the agreed upon approach which involved sampling at 5-foot intervals until fly ash material was encountered for 10 feet) At a depth of approximately 77 feet the liner material was encountered This observation supports observed condition in WE87-1 suggesting that we have successfully installed a well within the capped region of site GZA does not suggest that it was determined that the well is placed within a former disposal trench since this was not the primary objective of this effort and not part of GZAs Scope of Work or Work Plan Recommendations were made to GZA by CDM to continue drilling at this location to bedrock The objective of this recommendation was not presented GZA did not agree with this approach since it essentially commits us to an additional week of drilling without a clear objective Accordingly the hole was terminated at approximately 77 feet

and grout filled This information and GZAs approach was presented to RISWMC and EPA Both parties agreed with our approach EPA committed that if warranted they may require GZA to return to this area to perform additional testing GZA acknowledged with the understanding that additional drilling activities are outside the present Scope of Work and therefore must result in contractual consent agreemervE) and schedule modifications TTT bullmdash

8) GZA reviewed RIDOH residential well sampling data this reporting period and began incorporation of this data along with the EPACDM residential well results onto a survey map which indicates location of sampling points well status (activeinactive) and the current or planned status of the Johnston water supply lines Of cruciai significance in this effort is the fact that the RIDOH sampling location are relative only ie street name without address number This hampers GZAs efforts in accurately assessing potential seeks off-site impacts and therefore we seek EPAs assistance in obtaining more detailed information

9) On October 14 1987 GZA returned a call to John Zannos (EPA) at which time information relative to drilling status was presented John presented concerns over drilling efforts at the WE87-1 location based on CDMs comments Although the specifics were not known it was discussed that GZA may not have been proceeding with agreed upon approach GZA noted that they felt they had and sought to resolve any outstanding issues It was agreed to talk about perceived problems at the upcoming October 23 1987 meeting EPA also noted concern over size of borehole (multi-level wells) which may make them incompatible with Waterloo systems EPA suggested that EPA contact Weston Geophysical to perform caliper logging measurements prior to ordering Waterloo system GZA agreed

10) Air monitoring was initiated at the site also during this period The air sampling was conductance in accordance with GZA revised air monitoring plan and based on verbal comments presented to GZA from CDM The air monitoring effort involved the collection of air samples upwind and downwind of the WE87-1 drilling location during and subsequent to drilling In addition to the preliminary air monitoring effort which was designed to address logistical and analytical considerations four additional rounds have or will be completed at the site

GZX

PROBLEMS RESOLVED

1) GZA receives RIDOH residential well sampling data

GZX

V

DATE INSTALLED ^ ^ ^ f ^ ^ ^ T J ^ J PRmFCT z^^^ t^^ ^^ c y y y^7=s LOCATION

GZAENGIMFFR ^ f ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ gt ^ X ^ ^ mMTRATTnP

BORING Wo U7pound f t - tG FILE No C^QOHt- lR

y i ^ r c ^ y i

(S^ ZA 7 gt - y SZT^i^

WEATHER mKiniTinM ^ - y ^ cy ^ npii ^ FR y i ^ h u i y j ^ ^ ^ v T c K

REMARKS A U y 7 E l Q U R M pound y V 7 ^ A R ^ 7=-y0Z

A D e p ^ h -fc o p a - f

tn

o H 3 J 3 EvroAOT^

(SPOUT o UJ

oc

CO 03

CO

u o 211 gtshycc lt QepToATre

PPLLET 5 pound A L

CO

7 8 ^

Asyli

- T P P O r 6 U A f lt D P X P ^

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

bullPROTECTIVE CASING ^ - i

bull1-12 SCHO 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE SAND BflCKOLL

BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (QOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO S C M X

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ss DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT r 9 i H y

cOLOBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

cc

BORING Mn 7Z7poundf^7-77i FILE No r-laquo^gr^ DATE INSTALLED f ^ f - ^ ^ -30 - ^7

PROJECT Sf in ^^^^oA PXPS LOCATION L^^ J ylty ^ zeuro^

GZA EhiGlNFFR P^^y S i ^ ^ - ^ Z Y y CONTRACTOR G Z A lt^^^^-^^ 3^^ C

WEATHER rrgtMrgtiTinMlt C7ea r ^70 6 DRILLER A r 7 ^ c z r - ^ ^ ^ s lt7 ^

REMARKS yU7ZlBji^TpoundZyAdpoundAZP^ A Y j P =^^crAA P i c^Z^ S6ZZIZ^P Z^-PPz^

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

I bullPROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE

CO bullz o Q

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ AP j ^ y - ^ ^ ^ o PAlt5P J Plt07

D ^ P A t L S CO bull r iNC to COAnOC G A N D BACKnLL CO My CO

u o gtshyQ BP^PaTTPPP BOREHOLE lt PP L(PP

ID CO HHlt

i2^ bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

1-12 SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

686 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

696^m bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING Aij 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 67 Z z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

WELL N a r y i f ^ - ^ 4 BORING Wo 7J7E2 FILE No C - 3 0 0 Z t t ^ DATE raquoMlaquoTAiiFn ^ - r - ^ - f 6 - P 7

PROJECT C g n f r d I k lt ^ r d - f t l f ^ p S LOCATION

GZA ENGINEER ^ ^ y G u m z n e l y y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A O ^ i i i i n Q XL DS^ WEATHER CONDITIONS C g ^ ^ ^ 8 o S HRII FR X gt ^ tn J ^ P e i r r y REMARKS ALL AAf^ASURrvXeAZPS Ay(P POM P O P O P ( P U A P O y^J7PB

bullGROUND SURFACE

Dejcih -i-o op o f CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL

P V C - O J e A - y i o s h (TYPICALLY 05 THICK)

U^ell Q^posh PROTECrriVE CASING ^ TVPP ^ I T E E L S X H S 6 g ^ f o y i ^ 4rr ^ y ^ r e

p y CO

S e a cuf y4gt 7ltir t7

E 1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

6 y t f ^ ^ a ^00 ^ o UJ y^O 3 47^i7S a bull if 7^ ir o lt SSA7ro 7srz^

CO CpoundMe^ZT bull glMS tQ COARSE SAND BACKF1UU CQ

GlRouT

Q a p p iTo)( traquo^4 y r 7 y

bullBOREHOLE P 6 7

QpoundArrozrr^ Z3 7gt^LL e r CO II

67 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I-12SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (001 SLDTS)

77 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCMX

jpMym

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING J ^ A P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT _ ^ i Z l

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

i^Z^ WELL N a ^ ^ ^ r V ^ BORING Ho AlpoundAl lA-FILE No C-^ltgt(^7-7^ DATE INSTALLED 8 S 8 7 - ^ lt S - 8 7

PROJECT Cezii^c^ l L ^ ^ o 7 A 7 P P ^ S LOCATION John^-f^on 1 PXshyGZA FNfiiMFFR Po S o t raquo ^ e r y C0NTR5CT0R GZA 0^77^^ nc WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl^lt^Y^ S ^ DRILLER - Pe i - f ^y shyZ^yai^CREMARKS bull

QO DEPTH C GROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

-PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE j

CO

o Q

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE oo LJ I a- 7 t 5 e e P a ^ e I cr CO P o r bull FINE lto COARSE SAND aOiCKFILL CQ O e a i l s ID CO 7 u P J i - r e f i o gtshy

-BOREHOLE cc lt Pop OP ROCK 7^2 s

6 PAL CO 76 Z

782 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 9 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

33J BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN S i l jReyroAjrpound pet-ter- SpoundAL ^ 2ycr2e^c^__yoz_7i

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING T P A P L

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 8 2 y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

Thgr ltp7 ^

bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3

FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7

PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP

GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^

WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P

GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION

O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs

UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H

2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y

r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7

Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ

t tr ^ A bull T X V pound

yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO

980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE

lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L

CO 3

m^ j m j

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B

BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7

PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT

K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc

WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE

CO

O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I

L3

LU f o r O e - h a i l s O

if CC

YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt

dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer

CO SfAplusmn37o

J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN

3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z

S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7

PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X

GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co

WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY

o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06

PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P

CO z o p yio

H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3

111

t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt

S ^ A L 3 CO yo

230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)

OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0

GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7

PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R

GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)

l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo

TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s

Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO

O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito

H Q

rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ ^^7ropxpP

p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt

s CO 67

M TOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

lt

CO z o p 3

i j j

a r) CO CQ Z) CO

gtbull a lt 2

CO

DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V

PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp

WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^

REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA

lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^

p p e - 72^

SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L

786

206

BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^

TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn

Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri

T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^

CGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL

-BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC

7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2

DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX

GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7

p d P OP Floe^

CO

O Ishy5 2 0 shy

bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

CJ

UJ

t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T

5poundAt^ 29 q

3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC

WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ

DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c

60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^

REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound

g o DEPTH

ELEVATION

_ pound GROUND SURFICE

I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC

CONCRETE(TYPICALLY

SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)

73PPFOAXrp SEAL

SloL 70

bull bull bull

I bullPROTE

TYPE

ECTIVE CASING bdquo

CO

o

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

C_)

LJ

t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

t l 2S2 O

gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302

322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2

P-^^ nP I ^

WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^

DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72

PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J

GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o

WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

o - t P V C i r o m

f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE Sree^L y x

V

CO

o 70

1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL

bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO

u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO

100

Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

NOTE NOT TO SCALt

vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC

y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19

Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i

ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^

Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O

SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L

CO

o

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

u UJ

t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r

S P A L

CO 3

3 ^

361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)

s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P

S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Jvj-iw-fili

IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A

EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N

^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull

^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^

CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

FOR

RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA

Prepared for the

RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

OCTOBER 1981

CE MAGUIRE INC

PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND

Architects bull Engineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI

October 5 1981 CEM 3869

Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903

Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill

Dear Mr Delfino

In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area

The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing

We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects

Very truly yours

CE MAGUIRE INC

Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager

Enclosure

CMPdw

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

1 INTRODUCTION

2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK

3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX

TABLE NO TITLE

HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

FIGURE NO TITLE

1 LOCATION MAP

2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS

ATTACHMENTS

TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP

BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

FINAL GRADING PLAN

PAGE

1

5

9

PAGE

6

8

PAGE

2

11

DRAWING NO

1

2

3

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 6: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

Two observation wells were installed at this location between September 28 and 30 Well WE87-1B-B was installed to a depth of 67 feet and sealed in bedrock Well WE87-1B-A was installed to a depth of 368 feet in fill material The remainder of the borehole was then sealed using a bentonite grout

Borehole WE87-1C was performed approximately 20 feet to the southeast of location WE87-1B on September 30 1987 Soils at this location were sampled continuously down from the surface in an attempt to recover a sample of the PVC cap material A sample of this material was recovered from a depth of 77 feet (plusmn) Based upon a discussion between Mr Ken Wenger and Mr Hartley this borehole was terminated at a depth of 8 feet and sealed with bentonite grout on October 1 1987 GZA Drilling Inc left the site on October 1 1987 after steam cleaning all equipment

3) On September 22 1987 Mr Ralph L Gumpert an industrial hygienist with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) conducted an unannounced inspection of the CLF WE87-1 drilling activities The inspection resulted in verbal comments present by OSHA to GZAs field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZAs two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency communication devices

4) September 22 1987 meeting is held with Wehren Engineering GZA subcontractor responsible for preparation of the feasibility study to discuss the project and scope of work Wehren is currently preparing an FS work plan and is developing contract documents for GZAs review

5) Several problems associated with the drilling effort were encountered On September 23 1987 GZA spoke with Ken Wenger about these problems and to agree upon a solution

RIAL and GZA personnel had begun development of landfill well WE87-3 using a submissible air lift pump At the completion of this effort after removing at least the volume of water introduced to the well during packer testing it was realized the well had significantly shifted because of landfill operations conducted in the near vicinity of the well After repeated efforts over several days to remove the pump it was successfully removed from the well This experience made it obvious that the real potential exists for loosing this well because of significant well movement and potential breakage of the casing Accordingly GZA requested EPAs verbal comments andor approval of GZAs proposed sampling plan so that groundwater samples could be collected from all landfill wells as soon as possible to avoid the risk of eventual well loss EPA was informed that GZA and RIAL will proceed with well sampling the next week using the proposed plan unless we hear otherwise EPA was agreeable to this approach but suggested we contact CDM to determine status of their plan review On September 24 1987 GZA contacted CDM T Pederson was not in at that time On September 25 1987 CDM

returned phone call at which time it was noted that the sampling plan had not been review GZA presented their concerns over well shifting and potential problems CDM agreed and committed to present comments by the following week

The second drilling issue that emerged during this period involved drilling on the former hazardous waste disposal area (WE87-1) The location of this boring was selected based on recommendations made Jim Doorley (RISWMC) based his best recollection of the locations of the hazardous waste trenches relative to the capped area Observations made while drilling at the location resulted in the determination that the boring was most likely not within the capped portion of the waste cell At the same time RISWMC provided GZA with a copy of a closure plan prepared for the RISWMC by C E Maguire (copy enclosed)

Based on a map showing the location of the waste cell in that closure plan GZA relocated the WE87-1 boring to the approximate center of the apparent capped area This information was presented to EPA during our September 23 1987 phone conversation

6) On September 25 1987 GZA spoke with John Zannos (EPA) regarding EPAs position concerning the use of drilling foam during the advancement of the multi-level wells The use of foam had been suggested by Guild Drilling Co to help remove rock fragments in the wells which result in lower drilling rates EPAs position with regard to the use of foam were (1) it could not be used (2) foaming agents often contain organic constituents and (3) can only be used if we risk loosing the hole and only after EPA approval GZA acknowledged position and transferred information to Guild Drilling

7) On September 30 1987 another drilling issue emerged with regard to drilling at the WE87-1 location Following the completion of drilling and installation of sampling wells at this location GZA moved the drill rig approximately 20 feet to the south of the WE87-1 boring in order to more accurately assess surface conditions within the capped area ie the presence of fly ash (Note this intensive sampling effort was beyond the agreed upon approach which involved sampling at 5-foot intervals until fly ash material was encountered for 10 feet) At a depth of approximately 77 feet the liner material was encountered This observation supports observed condition in WE87-1 suggesting that we have successfully installed a well within the capped region of site GZA does not suggest that it was determined that the well is placed within a former disposal trench since this was not the primary objective of this effort and not part of GZAs Scope of Work or Work Plan Recommendations were made to GZA by CDM to continue drilling at this location to bedrock The objective of this recommendation was not presented GZA did not agree with this approach since it essentially commits us to an additional week of drilling without a clear objective Accordingly the hole was terminated at approximately 77 feet

and grout filled This information and GZAs approach was presented to RISWMC and EPA Both parties agreed with our approach EPA committed that if warranted they may require GZA to return to this area to perform additional testing GZA acknowledged with the understanding that additional drilling activities are outside the present Scope of Work and therefore must result in contractual consent agreemervE) and schedule modifications TTT bullmdash

8) GZA reviewed RIDOH residential well sampling data this reporting period and began incorporation of this data along with the EPACDM residential well results onto a survey map which indicates location of sampling points well status (activeinactive) and the current or planned status of the Johnston water supply lines Of cruciai significance in this effort is the fact that the RIDOH sampling location are relative only ie street name without address number This hampers GZAs efforts in accurately assessing potential seeks off-site impacts and therefore we seek EPAs assistance in obtaining more detailed information

9) On October 14 1987 GZA returned a call to John Zannos (EPA) at which time information relative to drilling status was presented John presented concerns over drilling efforts at the WE87-1 location based on CDMs comments Although the specifics were not known it was discussed that GZA may not have been proceeding with agreed upon approach GZA noted that they felt they had and sought to resolve any outstanding issues It was agreed to talk about perceived problems at the upcoming October 23 1987 meeting EPA also noted concern over size of borehole (multi-level wells) which may make them incompatible with Waterloo systems EPA suggested that EPA contact Weston Geophysical to perform caliper logging measurements prior to ordering Waterloo system GZA agreed

10) Air monitoring was initiated at the site also during this period The air sampling was conductance in accordance with GZA revised air monitoring plan and based on verbal comments presented to GZA from CDM The air monitoring effort involved the collection of air samples upwind and downwind of the WE87-1 drilling location during and subsequent to drilling In addition to the preliminary air monitoring effort which was designed to address logistical and analytical considerations four additional rounds have or will be completed at the site

GZX

PROBLEMS RESOLVED

1) GZA receives RIDOH residential well sampling data

GZX

V

DATE INSTALLED ^ ^ ^ f ^ ^ ^ T J ^ J PRmFCT z^^^ t^^ ^^ c y y y^7=s LOCATION

GZAENGIMFFR ^ f ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ gt ^ X ^ ^ mMTRATTnP

BORING Wo U7pound f t - tG FILE No C^QOHt- lR

y i ^ r c ^ y i

(S^ ZA 7 gt - y SZT^i^

WEATHER mKiniTinM ^ - y ^ cy ^ npii ^ FR y i ^ h u i y j ^ ^ ^ v T c K

REMARKS A U y 7 E l Q U R M pound y V 7 ^ A R ^ 7=-y0Z

A D e p ^ h -fc o p a - f

tn

o H 3 J 3 EvroAOT^

(SPOUT o UJ

oc

CO 03

CO

u o 211 gtshycc lt QepToATre

PPLLET 5 pound A L

CO

7 8 ^

Asyli

- T P P O r 6 U A f lt D P X P ^

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

bullPROTECTIVE CASING ^ - i

bull1-12 SCHO 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE SAND BflCKOLL

BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (QOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO S C M X

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ss DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT r 9 i H y

cOLOBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

cc

BORING Mn 7Z7poundf^7-77i FILE No r-laquo^gr^ DATE INSTALLED f ^ f - ^ ^ -30 - ^7

PROJECT Sf in ^^^^oA PXPS LOCATION L^^ J ylty ^ zeuro^

GZA EhiGlNFFR P^^y S i ^ ^ - ^ Z Y y CONTRACTOR G Z A lt^^^^-^^ 3^^ C

WEATHER rrgtMrgtiTinMlt C7ea r ^70 6 DRILLER A r 7 ^ c z r - ^ ^ ^ s lt7 ^

REMARKS yU7ZlBji^TpoundZyAdpoundAZP^ A Y j P =^^crAA P i c^Z^ S6ZZIZ^P Z^-PPz^

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

I bullPROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE

CO bullz o Q

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ AP j ^ y - ^ ^ ^ o PAlt5P J Plt07

D ^ P A t L S CO bull r iNC to COAnOC G A N D BACKnLL CO My CO

u o gtshyQ BP^PaTTPPP BOREHOLE lt PP L(PP

ID CO HHlt

i2^ bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

1-12 SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

686 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

696^m bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING Aij 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 67 Z z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

WELL N a r y i f ^ - ^ 4 BORING Wo 7J7E2 FILE No C - 3 0 0 Z t t ^ DATE raquoMlaquoTAiiFn ^ - r - ^ - f 6 - P 7

PROJECT C g n f r d I k lt ^ r d - f t l f ^ p S LOCATION

GZA ENGINEER ^ ^ y G u m z n e l y y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A O ^ i i i i n Q XL DS^ WEATHER CONDITIONS C g ^ ^ ^ 8 o S HRII FR X gt ^ tn J ^ P e i r r y REMARKS ALL AAf^ASURrvXeAZPS Ay(P POM P O P O P ( P U A P O y^J7PB

bullGROUND SURFACE

Dejcih -i-o op o f CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL

P V C - O J e A - y i o s h (TYPICALLY 05 THICK)

U^ell Q^posh PROTECrriVE CASING ^ TVPP ^ I T E E L S X H S 6 g ^ f o y i ^ 4rr ^ y ^ r e

p y CO

S e a cuf y4gt 7ltir t7

E 1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

6 y t f ^ ^ a ^00 ^ o UJ y^O 3 47^i7S a bull if 7^ ir o lt SSA7ro 7srz^

CO CpoundMe^ZT bull glMS tQ COARSE SAND BACKF1UU CQ

GlRouT

Q a p p iTo)( traquo^4 y r 7 y

bullBOREHOLE P 6 7

QpoundArrozrr^ Z3 7gt^LL e r CO II

67 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I-12SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (001 SLDTS)

77 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCMX

jpMym

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING J ^ A P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT _ ^ i Z l

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

i^Z^ WELL N a ^ ^ ^ r V ^ BORING Ho AlpoundAl lA-FILE No C-^ltgt(^7-7^ DATE INSTALLED 8 S 8 7 - ^ lt S - 8 7

PROJECT Cezii^c^ l L ^ ^ o 7 A 7 P P ^ S LOCATION John^-f^on 1 PXshyGZA FNfiiMFFR Po S o t raquo ^ e r y C0NTR5CT0R GZA 0^77^^ nc WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl^lt^Y^ S ^ DRILLER - Pe i - f ^y shyZ^yai^CREMARKS bull

QO DEPTH C GROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

-PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE j

CO

o Q

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE oo LJ I a- 7 t 5 e e P a ^ e I cr CO P o r bull FINE lto COARSE SAND aOiCKFILL CQ O e a i l s ID CO 7 u P J i - r e f i o gtshy

-BOREHOLE cc lt Pop OP ROCK 7^2 s

6 PAL CO 76 Z

782 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 9 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

33J BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN S i l jReyroAjrpound pet-ter- SpoundAL ^ 2ycr2e^c^__yoz_7i

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING T P A P L

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 8 2 y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

Thgr ltp7 ^

bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3

FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7

PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP

GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^

WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P

GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION

O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs

UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H

2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y

r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7

Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ

t tr ^ A bull T X V pound

yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO

980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE

lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L

CO 3

m^ j m j

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B

BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7

PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT

K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc

WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE

CO

O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I

L3

LU f o r O e - h a i l s O

if CC

YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt

dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer

CO SfAplusmn37o

J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN

3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z

S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7

PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X

GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co

WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY

o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06

PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P

CO z o p yio

H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3

111

t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt

S ^ A L 3 CO yo

230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)

OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0

GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7

PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R

GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)

l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo

TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s

Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO

O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito

H Q

rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ ^^7ropxpP

p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt

s CO 67

M TOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

lt

CO z o p 3

i j j

a r) CO CQ Z) CO

gtbull a lt 2

CO

DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V

PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp

WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^

REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA

lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^

p p e - 72^

SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L

786

206

BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^

TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn

Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri

T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^

CGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL

-BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC

7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2

DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX

GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7

p d P OP Floe^

CO

O Ishy5 2 0 shy

bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

CJ

UJ

t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T

5poundAt^ 29 q

3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC

WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ

DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c

60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^

REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound

g o DEPTH

ELEVATION

_ pound GROUND SURFICE

I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC

CONCRETE(TYPICALLY

SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)

73PPFOAXrp SEAL

SloL 70

bull bull bull

I bullPROTE

TYPE

ECTIVE CASING bdquo

CO

o

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

C_)

LJ

t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

t l 2S2 O

gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302

322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2

P-^^ nP I ^

WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^

DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72

PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J

GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o

WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

o - t P V C i r o m

f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE Sree^L y x

V

CO

o 70

1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL

bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO

u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO

100

Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

NOTE NOT TO SCALt

vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC

y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19

Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i

ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^

Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O

SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L

CO

o

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

u UJ

t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r

S P A L

CO 3

3 ^

361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)

s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P

S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Jvj-iw-fili

IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A

EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N

^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull

^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^

CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

FOR

RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA

Prepared for the

RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

OCTOBER 1981

CE MAGUIRE INC

PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND

Architects bull Engineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI

October 5 1981 CEM 3869

Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903

Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill

Dear Mr Delfino

In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area

The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing

We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects

Very truly yours

CE MAGUIRE INC

Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager

Enclosure

CMPdw

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

1 INTRODUCTION

2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK

3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX

TABLE NO TITLE

HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

FIGURE NO TITLE

1 LOCATION MAP

2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS

ATTACHMENTS

TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP

BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

FINAL GRADING PLAN

PAGE

1

5

9

PAGE

6

8

PAGE

2

11

DRAWING NO

1

2

3

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 7: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

returned phone call at which time it was noted that the sampling plan had not been review GZA presented their concerns over well shifting and potential problems CDM agreed and committed to present comments by the following week

The second drilling issue that emerged during this period involved drilling on the former hazardous waste disposal area (WE87-1) The location of this boring was selected based on recommendations made Jim Doorley (RISWMC) based his best recollection of the locations of the hazardous waste trenches relative to the capped area Observations made while drilling at the location resulted in the determination that the boring was most likely not within the capped portion of the waste cell At the same time RISWMC provided GZA with a copy of a closure plan prepared for the RISWMC by C E Maguire (copy enclosed)

Based on a map showing the location of the waste cell in that closure plan GZA relocated the WE87-1 boring to the approximate center of the apparent capped area This information was presented to EPA during our September 23 1987 phone conversation

6) On September 25 1987 GZA spoke with John Zannos (EPA) regarding EPAs position concerning the use of drilling foam during the advancement of the multi-level wells The use of foam had been suggested by Guild Drilling Co to help remove rock fragments in the wells which result in lower drilling rates EPAs position with regard to the use of foam were (1) it could not be used (2) foaming agents often contain organic constituents and (3) can only be used if we risk loosing the hole and only after EPA approval GZA acknowledged position and transferred information to Guild Drilling

7) On September 30 1987 another drilling issue emerged with regard to drilling at the WE87-1 location Following the completion of drilling and installation of sampling wells at this location GZA moved the drill rig approximately 20 feet to the south of the WE87-1 boring in order to more accurately assess surface conditions within the capped area ie the presence of fly ash (Note this intensive sampling effort was beyond the agreed upon approach which involved sampling at 5-foot intervals until fly ash material was encountered for 10 feet) At a depth of approximately 77 feet the liner material was encountered This observation supports observed condition in WE87-1 suggesting that we have successfully installed a well within the capped region of site GZA does not suggest that it was determined that the well is placed within a former disposal trench since this was not the primary objective of this effort and not part of GZAs Scope of Work or Work Plan Recommendations were made to GZA by CDM to continue drilling at this location to bedrock The objective of this recommendation was not presented GZA did not agree with this approach since it essentially commits us to an additional week of drilling without a clear objective Accordingly the hole was terminated at approximately 77 feet

and grout filled This information and GZAs approach was presented to RISWMC and EPA Both parties agreed with our approach EPA committed that if warranted they may require GZA to return to this area to perform additional testing GZA acknowledged with the understanding that additional drilling activities are outside the present Scope of Work and therefore must result in contractual consent agreemervE) and schedule modifications TTT bullmdash

8) GZA reviewed RIDOH residential well sampling data this reporting period and began incorporation of this data along with the EPACDM residential well results onto a survey map which indicates location of sampling points well status (activeinactive) and the current or planned status of the Johnston water supply lines Of cruciai significance in this effort is the fact that the RIDOH sampling location are relative only ie street name without address number This hampers GZAs efforts in accurately assessing potential seeks off-site impacts and therefore we seek EPAs assistance in obtaining more detailed information

9) On October 14 1987 GZA returned a call to John Zannos (EPA) at which time information relative to drilling status was presented John presented concerns over drilling efforts at the WE87-1 location based on CDMs comments Although the specifics were not known it was discussed that GZA may not have been proceeding with agreed upon approach GZA noted that they felt they had and sought to resolve any outstanding issues It was agreed to talk about perceived problems at the upcoming October 23 1987 meeting EPA also noted concern over size of borehole (multi-level wells) which may make them incompatible with Waterloo systems EPA suggested that EPA contact Weston Geophysical to perform caliper logging measurements prior to ordering Waterloo system GZA agreed

10) Air monitoring was initiated at the site also during this period The air sampling was conductance in accordance with GZA revised air monitoring plan and based on verbal comments presented to GZA from CDM The air monitoring effort involved the collection of air samples upwind and downwind of the WE87-1 drilling location during and subsequent to drilling In addition to the preliminary air monitoring effort which was designed to address logistical and analytical considerations four additional rounds have or will be completed at the site

GZX

PROBLEMS RESOLVED

1) GZA receives RIDOH residential well sampling data

GZX

V

DATE INSTALLED ^ ^ ^ f ^ ^ ^ T J ^ J PRmFCT z^^^ t^^ ^^ c y y y^7=s LOCATION

GZAENGIMFFR ^ f ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ gt ^ X ^ ^ mMTRATTnP

BORING Wo U7pound f t - tG FILE No C^QOHt- lR

y i ^ r c ^ y i

(S^ ZA 7 gt - y SZT^i^

WEATHER mKiniTinM ^ - y ^ cy ^ npii ^ FR y i ^ h u i y j ^ ^ ^ v T c K

REMARKS A U y 7 E l Q U R M pound y V 7 ^ A R ^ 7=-y0Z

A D e p ^ h -fc o p a - f

tn

o H 3 J 3 EvroAOT^

(SPOUT o UJ

oc

CO 03

CO

u o 211 gtshycc lt QepToATre

PPLLET 5 pound A L

CO

7 8 ^

Asyli

- T P P O r 6 U A f lt D P X P ^

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

bullPROTECTIVE CASING ^ - i

bull1-12 SCHO 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE SAND BflCKOLL

BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (QOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO S C M X

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ss DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT r 9 i H y

cOLOBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

cc

BORING Mn 7Z7poundf^7-77i FILE No r-laquo^gr^ DATE INSTALLED f ^ f - ^ ^ -30 - ^7

PROJECT Sf in ^^^^oA PXPS LOCATION L^^ J ylty ^ zeuro^

GZA EhiGlNFFR P^^y S i ^ ^ - ^ Z Y y CONTRACTOR G Z A lt^^^^-^^ 3^^ C

WEATHER rrgtMrgtiTinMlt C7ea r ^70 6 DRILLER A r 7 ^ c z r - ^ ^ ^ s lt7 ^

REMARKS yU7ZlBji^TpoundZyAdpoundAZP^ A Y j P =^^crAA P i c^Z^ S6ZZIZ^P Z^-PPz^

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

I bullPROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE

CO bullz o Q

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ AP j ^ y - ^ ^ ^ o PAlt5P J Plt07

D ^ P A t L S CO bull r iNC to COAnOC G A N D BACKnLL CO My CO

u o gtshyQ BP^PaTTPPP BOREHOLE lt PP L(PP

ID CO HHlt

i2^ bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

1-12 SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

686 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

696^m bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING Aij 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 67 Z z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

WELL N a r y i f ^ - ^ 4 BORING Wo 7J7E2 FILE No C - 3 0 0 Z t t ^ DATE raquoMlaquoTAiiFn ^ - r - ^ - f 6 - P 7

PROJECT C g n f r d I k lt ^ r d - f t l f ^ p S LOCATION

GZA ENGINEER ^ ^ y G u m z n e l y y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A O ^ i i i i n Q XL DS^ WEATHER CONDITIONS C g ^ ^ ^ 8 o S HRII FR X gt ^ tn J ^ P e i r r y REMARKS ALL AAf^ASURrvXeAZPS Ay(P POM P O P O P ( P U A P O y^J7PB

bullGROUND SURFACE

Dejcih -i-o op o f CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL

P V C - O J e A - y i o s h (TYPICALLY 05 THICK)

U^ell Q^posh PROTECrriVE CASING ^ TVPP ^ I T E E L S X H S 6 g ^ f o y i ^ 4rr ^ y ^ r e

p y CO

S e a cuf y4gt 7ltir t7

E 1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

6 y t f ^ ^ a ^00 ^ o UJ y^O 3 47^i7S a bull if 7^ ir o lt SSA7ro 7srz^

CO CpoundMe^ZT bull glMS tQ COARSE SAND BACKF1UU CQ

GlRouT

Q a p p iTo)( traquo^4 y r 7 y

bullBOREHOLE P 6 7

QpoundArrozrr^ Z3 7gt^LL e r CO II

67 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I-12SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (001 SLDTS)

77 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCMX

jpMym

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING J ^ A P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT _ ^ i Z l

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

i^Z^ WELL N a ^ ^ ^ r V ^ BORING Ho AlpoundAl lA-FILE No C-^ltgt(^7-7^ DATE INSTALLED 8 S 8 7 - ^ lt S - 8 7

PROJECT Cezii^c^ l L ^ ^ o 7 A 7 P P ^ S LOCATION John^-f^on 1 PXshyGZA FNfiiMFFR Po S o t raquo ^ e r y C0NTR5CT0R GZA 0^77^^ nc WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl^lt^Y^ S ^ DRILLER - Pe i - f ^y shyZ^yai^CREMARKS bull

QO DEPTH C GROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

-PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE j

CO

o Q

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE oo LJ I a- 7 t 5 e e P a ^ e I cr CO P o r bull FINE lto COARSE SAND aOiCKFILL CQ O e a i l s ID CO 7 u P J i - r e f i o gtshy

-BOREHOLE cc lt Pop OP ROCK 7^2 s

6 PAL CO 76 Z

782 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 9 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

33J BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN S i l jReyroAjrpound pet-ter- SpoundAL ^ 2ycr2e^c^__yoz_7i

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING T P A P L

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 8 2 y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

Thgr ltp7 ^

bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3

FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7

PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP

GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^

WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P

GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION

O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs

UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H

2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y

r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7

Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ

t tr ^ A bull T X V pound

yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO

980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE

lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L

CO 3

m^ j m j

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B

BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7

PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT

K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc

WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE

CO

O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I

L3

LU f o r O e - h a i l s O

if CC

YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt

dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer

CO SfAplusmn37o

J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN

3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z

S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7

PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X

GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co

WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY

o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06

PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P

CO z o p yio

H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3

111

t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt

S ^ A L 3 CO yo

230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)

OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0

GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7

PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R

GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)

l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo

TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s

Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO

O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito

H Q

rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ ^^7ropxpP

p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt

s CO 67

M TOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

lt

CO z o p 3

i j j

a r) CO CQ Z) CO

gtbull a lt 2

CO

DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V

PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp

WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^

REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA

lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^

p p e - 72^

SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L

786

206

BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^

TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn

Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri

T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^

CGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL

-BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC

7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2

DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX

GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7

p d P OP Floe^

CO

O Ishy5 2 0 shy

bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

CJ

UJ

t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T

5poundAt^ 29 q

3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC

WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ

DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c

60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^

REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound

g o DEPTH

ELEVATION

_ pound GROUND SURFICE

I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC

CONCRETE(TYPICALLY

SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)

73PPFOAXrp SEAL

SloL 70

bull bull bull

I bullPROTE

TYPE

ECTIVE CASING bdquo

CO

o

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

C_)

LJ

t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

t l 2S2 O

gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302

322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2

P-^^ nP I ^

WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^

DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72

PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J

GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o

WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

o - t P V C i r o m

f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE Sree^L y x

V

CO

o 70

1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL

bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO

u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO

100

Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

NOTE NOT TO SCALt

vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC

y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19

Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i

ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^

Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O

SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L

CO

o

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

u UJ

t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r

S P A L

CO 3

3 ^

361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)

s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P

S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Jvj-iw-fili

IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A

EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N

^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull

^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^

CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

FOR

RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA

Prepared for the

RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

OCTOBER 1981

CE MAGUIRE INC

PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND

Architects bull Engineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI

October 5 1981 CEM 3869

Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903

Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill

Dear Mr Delfino

In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area

The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing

We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects

Very truly yours

CE MAGUIRE INC

Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager

Enclosure

CMPdw

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

1 INTRODUCTION

2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK

3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX

TABLE NO TITLE

HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

FIGURE NO TITLE

1 LOCATION MAP

2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS

ATTACHMENTS

TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP

BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

FINAL GRADING PLAN

PAGE

1

5

9

PAGE

6

8

PAGE

2

11

DRAWING NO

1

2

3

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 8: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

and grout filled This information and GZAs approach was presented to RISWMC and EPA Both parties agreed with our approach EPA committed that if warranted they may require GZA to return to this area to perform additional testing GZA acknowledged with the understanding that additional drilling activities are outside the present Scope of Work and therefore must result in contractual consent agreemervE) and schedule modifications TTT bullmdash

8) GZA reviewed RIDOH residential well sampling data this reporting period and began incorporation of this data along with the EPACDM residential well results onto a survey map which indicates location of sampling points well status (activeinactive) and the current or planned status of the Johnston water supply lines Of cruciai significance in this effort is the fact that the RIDOH sampling location are relative only ie street name without address number This hampers GZAs efforts in accurately assessing potential seeks off-site impacts and therefore we seek EPAs assistance in obtaining more detailed information

9) On October 14 1987 GZA returned a call to John Zannos (EPA) at which time information relative to drilling status was presented John presented concerns over drilling efforts at the WE87-1 location based on CDMs comments Although the specifics were not known it was discussed that GZA may not have been proceeding with agreed upon approach GZA noted that they felt they had and sought to resolve any outstanding issues It was agreed to talk about perceived problems at the upcoming October 23 1987 meeting EPA also noted concern over size of borehole (multi-level wells) which may make them incompatible with Waterloo systems EPA suggested that EPA contact Weston Geophysical to perform caliper logging measurements prior to ordering Waterloo system GZA agreed

10) Air monitoring was initiated at the site also during this period The air sampling was conductance in accordance with GZA revised air monitoring plan and based on verbal comments presented to GZA from CDM The air monitoring effort involved the collection of air samples upwind and downwind of the WE87-1 drilling location during and subsequent to drilling In addition to the preliminary air monitoring effort which was designed to address logistical and analytical considerations four additional rounds have or will be completed at the site

GZX

PROBLEMS RESOLVED

1) GZA receives RIDOH residential well sampling data

GZX

V

DATE INSTALLED ^ ^ ^ f ^ ^ ^ T J ^ J PRmFCT z^^^ t^^ ^^ c y y y^7=s LOCATION

GZAENGIMFFR ^ f ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ gt ^ X ^ ^ mMTRATTnP

BORING Wo U7pound f t - tG FILE No C^QOHt- lR

y i ^ r c ^ y i

(S^ ZA 7 gt - y SZT^i^

WEATHER mKiniTinM ^ - y ^ cy ^ npii ^ FR y i ^ h u i y j ^ ^ ^ v T c K

REMARKS A U y 7 E l Q U R M pound y V 7 ^ A R ^ 7=-y0Z

A D e p ^ h -fc o p a - f

tn

o H 3 J 3 EvroAOT^

(SPOUT o UJ

oc

CO 03

CO

u o 211 gtshycc lt QepToATre

PPLLET 5 pound A L

CO

7 8 ^

Asyli

- T P P O r 6 U A f lt D P X P ^

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

bullPROTECTIVE CASING ^ - i

bull1-12 SCHO 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE SAND BflCKOLL

BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (QOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO S C M X

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ss DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT r 9 i H y

cOLOBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

cc

BORING Mn 7Z7poundf^7-77i FILE No r-laquo^gr^ DATE INSTALLED f ^ f - ^ ^ -30 - ^7

PROJECT Sf in ^^^^oA PXPS LOCATION L^^ J ylty ^ zeuro^

GZA EhiGlNFFR P^^y S i ^ ^ - ^ Z Y y CONTRACTOR G Z A lt^^^^-^^ 3^^ C

WEATHER rrgtMrgtiTinMlt C7ea r ^70 6 DRILLER A r 7 ^ c z r - ^ ^ ^ s lt7 ^

REMARKS yU7ZlBji^TpoundZyAdpoundAZP^ A Y j P =^^crAA P i c^Z^ S6ZZIZ^P Z^-PPz^

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

I bullPROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE

CO bullz o Q

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ AP j ^ y - ^ ^ ^ o PAlt5P J Plt07

D ^ P A t L S CO bull r iNC to COAnOC G A N D BACKnLL CO My CO

u o gtshyQ BP^PaTTPPP BOREHOLE lt PP L(PP

ID CO HHlt

i2^ bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

1-12 SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

686 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

696^m bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING Aij 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 67 Z z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

WELL N a r y i f ^ - ^ 4 BORING Wo 7J7E2 FILE No C - 3 0 0 Z t t ^ DATE raquoMlaquoTAiiFn ^ - r - ^ - f 6 - P 7

PROJECT C g n f r d I k lt ^ r d - f t l f ^ p S LOCATION

GZA ENGINEER ^ ^ y G u m z n e l y y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A O ^ i i i i n Q XL DS^ WEATHER CONDITIONS C g ^ ^ ^ 8 o S HRII FR X gt ^ tn J ^ P e i r r y REMARKS ALL AAf^ASURrvXeAZPS Ay(P POM P O P O P ( P U A P O y^J7PB

bullGROUND SURFACE

Dejcih -i-o op o f CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL

P V C - O J e A - y i o s h (TYPICALLY 05 THICK)

U^ell Q^posh PROTECrriVE CASING ^ TVPP ^ I T E E L S X H S 6 g ^ f o y i ^ 4rr ^ y ^ r e

p y CO

S e a cuf y4gt 7ltir t7

E 1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

6 y t f ^ ^ a ^00 ^ o UJ y^O 3 47^i7S a bull if 7^ ir o lt SSA7ro 7srz^

CO CpoundMe^ZT bull glMS tQ COARSE SAND BACKF1UU CQ

GlRouT

Q a p p iTo)( traquo^4 y r 7 y

bullBOREHOLE P 6 7

QpoundArrozrr^ Z3 7gt^LL e r CO II

67 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I-12SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (001 SLDTS)

77 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCMX

jpMym

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING J ^ A P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT _ ^ i Z l

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

i^Z^ WELL N a ^ ^ ^ r V ^ BORING Ho AlpoundAl lA-FILE No C-^ltgt(^7-7^ DATE INSTALLED 8 S 8 7 - ^ lt S - 8 7

PROJECT Cezii^c^ l L ^ ^ o 7 A 7 P P ^ S LOCATION John^-f^on 1 PXshyGZA FNfiiMFFR Po S o t raquo ^ e r y C0NTR5CT0R GZA 0^77^^ nc WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl^lt^Y^ S ^ DRILLER - Pe i - f ^y shyZ^yai^CREMARKS bull

QO DEPTH C GROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

-PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE j

CO

o Q

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE oo LJ I a- 7 t 5 e e P a ^ e I cr CO P o r bull FINE lto COARSE SAND aOiCKFILL CQ O e a i l s ID CO 7 u P J i - r e f i o gtshy

-BOREHOLE cc lt Pop OP ROCK 7^2 s

6 PAL CO 76 Z

782 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 9 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

33J BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN S i l jReyroAjrpound pet-ter- SpoundAL ^ 2ycr2e^c^__yoz_7i

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING T P A P L

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 8 2 y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

Thgr ltp7 ^

bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3

FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7

PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP

GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^

WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P

GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION

O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs

UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H

2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y

r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7

Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ

t tr ^ A bull T X V pound

yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO

980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE

lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L

CO 3

m^ j m j

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B

BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7

PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT

K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc

WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE

CO

O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I

L3

LU f o r O e - h a i l s O

if CC

YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt

dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer

CO SfAplusmn37o

J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN

3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z

S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7

PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X

GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co

WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY

o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06

PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P

CO z o p yio

H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3

111

t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt

S ^ A L 3 CO yo

230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)

OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0

GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7

PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R

GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)

l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo

TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s

Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO

O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito

H Q

rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ ^^7ropxpP

p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt

s CO 67

M TOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

lt

CO z o p 3

i j j

a r) CO CQ Z) CO

gtbull a lt 2

CO

DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V

PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp

WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^

REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA

lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^

p p e - 72^

SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L

786

206

BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^

TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn

Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri

T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^

CGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL

-BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC

7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2

DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX

GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7

p d P OP Floe^

CO

O Ishy5 2 0 shy

bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

CJ

UJ

t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T

5poundAt^ 29 q

3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC

WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ

DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c

60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^

REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound

g o DEPTH

ELEVATION

_ pound GROUND SURFICE

I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC

CONCRETE(TYPICALLY

SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)

73PPFOAXrp SEAL

SloL 70

bull bull bull

I bullPROTE

TYPE

ECTIVE CASING bdquo

CO

o

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

C_)

LJ

t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

t l 2S2 O

gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302

322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2

P-^^ nP I ^

WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^

DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72

PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J

GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o

WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

o - t P V C i r o m

f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE Sree^L y x

V

CO

o 70

1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL

bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO

u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO

100

Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

NOTE NOT TO SCALt

vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC

y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19

Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i

ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^

Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O

SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L

CO

o

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

u UJ

t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r

S P A L

CO 3

3 ^

361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)

s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P

S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Jvj-iw-fili

IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A

EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N

^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull

^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^

CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

FOR

RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA

Prepared for the

RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

OCTOBER 1981

CE MAGUIRE INC

PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND

Architects bull Engineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI

October 5 1981 CEM 3869

Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903

Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill

Dear Mr Delfino

In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area

The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing

We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects

Very truly yours

CE MAGUIRE INC

Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager

Enclosure

CMPdw

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

1 INTRODUCTION

2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK

3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX

TABLE NO TITLE

HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

FIGURE NO TITLE

1 LOCATION MAP

2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS

ATTACHMENTS

TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP

BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

FINAL GRADING PLAN

PAGE

1

5

9

PAGE

6

8

PAGE

2

11

DRAWING NO

1

2

3

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 9: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

PROBLEMS RESOLVED

1) GZA receives RIDOH residential well sampling data

GZX

V

DATE INSTALLED ^ ^ ^ f ^ ^ ^ T J ^ J PRmFCT z^^^ t^^ ^^ c y y y^7=s LOCATION

GZAENGIMFFR ^ f ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ gt ^ X ^ ^ mMTRATTnP

BORING Wo U7pound f t - tG FILE No C^QOHt- lR

y i ^ r c ^ y i

(S^ ZA 7 gt - y SZT^i^

WEATHER mKiniTinM ^ - y ^ cy ^ npii ^ FR y i ^ h u i y j ^ ^ ^ v T c K

REMARKS A U y 7 E l Q U R M pound y V 7 ^ A R ^ 7=-y0Z

A D e p ^ h -fc o p a - f

tn

o H 3 J 3 EvroAOT^

(SPOUT o UJ

oc

CO 03

CO

u o 211 gtshycc lt QepToATre

PPLLET 5 pound A L

CO

7 8 ^

Asyli

- T P P O r 6 U A f lt D P X P ^

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

bullPROTECTIVE CASING ^ - i

bull1-12 SCHO 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE SAND BflCKOLL

BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (QOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO S C M X

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ss DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT r 9 i H y

cOLOBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

cc

BORING Mn 7Z7poundf^7-77i FILE No r-laquo^gr^ DATE INSTALLED f ^ f - ^ ^ -30 - ^7

PROJECT Sf in ^^^^oA PXPS LOCATION L^^ J ylty ^ zeuro^

GZA EhiGlNFFR P^^y S i ^ ^ - ^ Z Y y CONTRACTOR G Z A lt^^^^-^^ 3^^ C

WEATHER rrgtMrgtiTinMlt C7ea r ^70 6 DRILLER A r 7 ^ c z r - ^ ^ ^ s lt7 ^

REMARKS yU7ZlBji^TpoundZyAdpoundAZP^ A Y j P =^^crAA P i c^Z^ S6ZZIZ^P Z^-PPz^

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

I bullPROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE

CO bullz o Q

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ AP j ^ y - ^ ^ ^ o PAlt5P J Plt07

D ^ P A t L S CO bull r iNC to COAnOC G A N D BACKnLL CO My CO

u o gtshyQ BP^PaTTPPP BOREHOLE lt PP L(PP

ID CO HHlt

i2^ bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

1-12 SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

686 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

696^m bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING Aij 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 67 Z z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

WELL N a r y i f ^ - ^ 4 BORING Wo 7J7E2 FILE No C - 3 0 0 Z t t ^ DATE raquoMlaquoTAiiFn ^ - r - ^ - f 6 - P 7

PROJECT C g n f r d I k lt ^ r d - f t l f ^ p S LOCATION

GZA ENGINEER ^ ^ y G u m z n e l y y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A O ^ i i i i n Q XL DS^ WEATHER CONDITIONS C g ^ ^ ^ 8 o S HRII FR X gt ^ tn J ^ P e i r r y REMARKS ALL AAf^ASURrvXeAZPS Ay(P POM P O P O P ( P U A P O y^J7PB

bullGROUND SURFACE

Dejcih -i-o op o f CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL

P V C - O J e A - y i o s h (TYPICALLY 05 THICK)

U^ell Q^posh PROTECrriVE CASING ^ TVPP ^ I T E E L S X H S 6 g ^ f o y i ^ 4rr ^ y ^ r e

p y CO

S e a cuf y4gt 7ltir t7

E 1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

6 y t f ^ ^ a ^00 ^ o UJ y^O 3 47^i7S a bull if 7^ ir o lt SSA7ro 7srz^

CO CpoundMe^ZT bull glMS tQ COARSE SAND BACKF1UU CQ

GlRouT

Q a p p iTo)( traquo^4 y r 7 y

bullBOREHOLE P 6 7

QpoundArrozrr^ Z3 7gt^LL e r CO II

67 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I-12SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (001 SLDTS)

77 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCMX

jpMym

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING J ^ A P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT _ ^ i Z l

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

i^Z^ WELL N a ^ ^ ^ r V ^ BORING Ho AlpoundAl lA-FILE No C-^ltgt(^7-7^ DATE INSTALLED 8 S 8 7 - ^ lt S - 8 7

PROJECT Cezii^c^ l L ^ ^ o 7 A 7 P P ^ S LOCATION John^-f^on 1 PXshyGZA FNfiiMFFR Po S o t raquo ^ e r y C0NTR5CT0R GZA 0^77^^ nc WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl^lt^Y^ S ^ DRILLER - Pe i - f ^y shyZ^yai^CREMARKS bull

QO DEPTH C GROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

-PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE j

CO

o Q

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE oo LJ I a- 7 t 5 e e P a ^ e I cr CO P o r bull FINE lto COARSE SAND aOiCKFILL CQ O e a i l s ID CO 7 u P J i - r e f i o gtshy

-BOREHOLE cc lt Pop OP ROCK 7^2 s

6 PAL CO 76 Z

782 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 9 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

33J BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN S i l jReyroAjrpound pet-ter- SpoundAL ^ 2ycr2e^c^__yoz_7i

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING T P A P L

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 8 2 y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

Thgr ltp7 ^

bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3

FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7

PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP

GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^

WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P

GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION

O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs

UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H

2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y

r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7

Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ

t tr ^ A bull T X V pound

yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO

980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE

lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L

CO 3

m^ j m j

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B

BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7

PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT

K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc

WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE

CO

O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I

L3

LU f o r O e - h a i l s O

if CC

YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt

dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer

CO SfAplusmn37o

J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN

3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z

S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7

PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X

GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co

WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY

o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06

PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P

CO z o p yio

H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3

111

t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt

S ^ A L 3 CO yo

230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)

OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0

GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7

PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R

GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)

l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo

TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s

Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO

O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito

H Q

rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ ^^7ropxpP

p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt

s CO 67

M TOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

lt

CO z o p 3

i j j

a r) CO CQ Z) CO

gtbull a lt 2

CO

DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V

PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp

WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^

REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA

lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^

p p e - 72^

SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L

786

206

BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^

TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn

Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri

T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^

CGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL

-BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC

7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2

DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX

GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7

p d P OP Floe^

CO

O Ishy5 2 0 shy

bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

CJ

UJ

t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T

5poundAt^ 29 q

3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC

WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ

DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c

60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^

REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound

g o DEPTH

ELEVATION

_ pound GROUND SURFICE

I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC

CONCRETE(TYPICALLY

SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)

73PPFOAXrp SEAL

SloL 70

bull bull bull

I bullPROTE

TYPE

ECTIVE CASING bdquo

CO

o

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

C_)

LJ

t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

t l 2S2 O

gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302

322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2

P-^^ nP I ^

WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^

DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72

PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J

GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o

WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

o - t P V C i r o m

f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE Sree^L y x

V

CO

o 70

1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL

bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO

u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO

100

Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

NOTE NOT TO SCALt

vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC

y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19

Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i

ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^

Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O

SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L

CO

o

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

u UJ

t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r

S P A L

CO 3

3 ^

361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)

s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P

S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Jvj-iw-fili

IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A

EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N

^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull

^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^

CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

FOR

RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA

Prepared for the

RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

OCTOBER 1981

CE MAGUIRE INC

PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND

Architects bull Engineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI

October 5 1981 CEM 3869

Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903

Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill

Dear Mr Delfino

In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area

The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing

We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects

Very truly yours

CE MAGUIRE INC

Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager

Enclosure

CMPdw

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

1 INTRODUCTION

2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK

3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX

TABLE NO TITLE

HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

FIGURE NO TITLE

1 LOCATION MAP

2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS

ATTACHMENTS

TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP

BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

FINAL GRADING PLAN

PAGE

1

5

9

PAGE

6

8

PAGE

2

11

DRAWING NO

1

2

3

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 10: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

V

DATE INSTALLED ^ ^ ^ f ^ ^ ^ T J ^ J PRmFCT z^^^ t^^ ^^ c y y y^7=s LOCATION

GZAENGIMFFR ^ f ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ gt ^ X ^ ^ mMTRATTnP

BORING Wo U7pound f t - tG FILE No C^QOHt- lR

y i ^ r c ^ y i

(S^ ZA 7 gt - y SZT^i^

WEATHER mKiniTinM ^ - y ^ cy ^ npii ^ FR y i ^ h u i y j ^ ^ ^ v T c K

REMARKS A U y 7 E l Q U R M pound y V 7 ^ A R ^ 7=-y0Z

A D e p ^ h -fc o p a - f

tn

o H 3 J 3 EvroAOT^

(SPOUT o UJ

oc

CO 03

CO

u o 211 gtshycc lt QepToATre

PPLLET 5 pound A L

CO

7 8 ^

Asyli

- T P P O r 6 U A f lt D P X P ^

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

bullPROTECTIVE CASING ^ - i

bull1-12 SCHO 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE SAND BflCKOLL

BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (QOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO S C M X

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ss DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT r 9 i H y

cOLOBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

cc

BORING Mn 7Z7poundf^7-77i FILE No r-laquo^gr^ DATE INSTALLED f ^ f - ^ ^ -30 - ^7

PROJECT Sf in ^^^^oA PXPS LOCATION L^^ J ylty ^ zeuro^

GZA EhiGlNFFR P^^y S i ^ ^ - ^ Z Y y CONTRACTOR G Z A lt^^^^-^^ 3^^ C

WEATHER rrgtMrgtiTinMlt C7ea r ^70 6 DRILLER A r 7 ^ c z r - ^ ^ ^ s lt7 ^

REMARKS yU7ZlBji^TpoundZyAdpoundAZP^ A Y j P =^^crAA P i c^Z^ S6ZZIZ^P Z^-PPz^

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

I bullPROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE

CO bullz o Q

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ AP j ^ y - ^ ^ ^ o PAlt5P J Plt07

D ^ P A t L S CO bull r iNC to COAnOC G A N D BACKnLL CO My CO

u o gtshyQ BP^PaTTPPP BOREHOLE lt PP L(PP

ID CO HHlt

i2^ bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

1-12 SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

686 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

696^m bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING Aij 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 67 Z z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

WELL N a r y i f ^ - ^ 4 BORING Wo 7J7E2 FILE No C - 3 0 0 Z t t ^ DATE raquoMlaquoTAiiFn ^ - r - ^ - f 6 - P 7

PROJECT C g n f r d I k lt ^ r d - f t l f ^ p S LOCATION

GZA ENGINEER ^ ^ y G u m z n e l y y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A O ^ i i i i n Q XL DS^ WEATHER CONDITIONS C g ^ ^ ^ 8 o S HRII FR X gt ^ tn J ^ P e i r r y REMARKS ALL AAf^ASURrvXeAZPS Ay(P POM P O P O P ( P U A P O y^J7PB

bullGROUND SURFACE

Dejcih -i-o op o f CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL

P V C - O J e A - y i o s h (TYPICALLY 05 THICK)

U^ell Q^posh PROTECrriVE CASING ^ TVPP ^ I T E E L S X H S 6 g ^ f o y i ^ 4rr ^ y ^ r e

p y CO

S e a cuf y4gt 7ltir t7

E 1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

6 y t f ^ ^ a ^00 ^ o UJ y^O 3 47^i7S a bull if 7^ ir o lt SSA7ro 7srz^

CO CpoundMe^ZT bull glMS tQ COARSE SAND BACKF1UU CQ

GlRouT

Q a p p iTo)( traquo^4 y r 7 y

bullBOREHOLE P 6 7

QpoundArrozrr^ Z3 7gt^LL e r CO II

67 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I-12SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (001 SLDTS)

77 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCMX

jpMym

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING J ^ A P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT _ ^ i Z l

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

i^Z^ WELL N a ^ ^ ^ r V ^ BORING Ho AlpoundAl lA-FILE No C-^ltgt(^7-7^ DATE INSTALLED 8 S 8 7 - ^ lt S - 8 7

PROJECT Cezii^c^ l L ^ ^ o 7 A 7 P P ^ S LOCATION John^-f^on 1 PXshyGZA FNfiiMFFR Po S o t raquo ^ e r y C0NTR5CT0R GZA 0^77^^ nc WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl^lt^Y^ S ^ DRILLER - Pe i - f ^y shyZ^yai^CREMARKS bull

QO DEPTH C GROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

-PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE j

CO

o Q

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE oo LJ I a- 7 t 5 e e P a ^ e I cr CO P o r bull FINE lto COARSE SAND aOiCKFILL CQ O e a i l s ID CO 7 u P J i - r e f i o gtshy

-BOREHOLE cc lt Pop OP ROCK 7^2 s

6 PAL CO 76 Z

782 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 9 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

33J BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN S i l jReyroAjrpound pet-ter- SpoundAL ^ 2ycr2e^c^__yoz_7i

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING T P A P L

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 8 2 y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

Thgr ltp7 ^

bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3

FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7

PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP

GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^

WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P

GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION

O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs

UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H

2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y

r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7

Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ

t tr ^ A bull T X V pound

yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO

980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE

lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L

CO 3

m^ j m j

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B

BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7

PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT

K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc

WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE

CO

O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I

L3

LU f o r O e - h a i l s O

if CC

YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt

dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer

CO SfAplusmn37o

J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN

3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z

S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7

PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X

GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co

WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY

o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06

PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P

CO z o p yio

H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3

111

t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt

S ^ A L 3 CO yo

230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)

OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0

GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7

PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R

GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)

l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo

TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s

Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO

O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito

H Q

rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ ^^7ropxpP

p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt

s CO 67

M TOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

lt

CO z o p 3

i j j

a r) CO CQ Z) CO

gtbull a lt 2

CO

DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V

PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp

WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^

REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA

lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^

p p e - 72^

SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L

786

206

BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^

TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn

Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri

T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^

CGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL

-BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC

7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2

DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX

GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7

p d P OP Floe^

CO

O Ishy5 2 0 shy

bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

CJ

UJ

t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T

5poundAt^ 29 q

3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC

WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ

DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c

60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^

REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound

g o DEPTH

ELEVATION

_ pound GROUND SURFICE

I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC

CONCRETE(TYPICALLY

SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)

73PPFOAXrp SEAL

SloL 70

bull bull bull

I bullPROTE

TYPE

ECTIVE CASING bdquo

CO

o

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

C_)

LJ

t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

t l 2S2 O

gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302

322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2

P-^^ nP I ^

WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^

DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72

PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J

GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o

WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

o - t P V C i r o m

f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE Sree^L y x

V

CO

o 70

1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL

bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO

u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO

100

Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

NOTE NOT TO SCALt

vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC

y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19

Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i

ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^

Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O

SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L

CO

o

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

u UJ

t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r

S P A L

CO 3

3 ^

361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)

s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P

S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Jvj-iw-fili

IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A

EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N

^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull

^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^

CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

FOR

RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA

Prepared for the

RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

OCTOBER 1981

CE MAGUIRE INC

PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND

Architects bull Engineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI

October 5 1981 CEM 3869

Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903

Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill

Dear Mr Delfino

In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area

The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing

We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects

Very truly yours

CE MAGUIRE INC

Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager

Enclosure

CMPdw

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

1 INTRODUCTION

2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK

3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX

TABLE NO TITLE

HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

FIGURE NO TITLE

1 LOCATION MAP

2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS

ATTACHMENTS

TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP

BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

FINAL GRADING PLAN

PAGE

1

5

9

PAGE

6

8

PAGE

2

11

DRAWING NO

1

2

3

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 11: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

cc

BORING Mn 7Z7poundf^7-77i FILE No r-laquo^gr^ DATE INSTALLED f ^ f - ^ ^ -30 - ^7

PROJECT Sf in ^^^^oA PXPS LOCATION L^^ J ylty ^ zeuro^

GZA EhiGlNFFR P^^y S i ^ ^ - ^ Z Y y CONTRACTOR G Z A lt^^^^-^^ 3^^ C

WEATHER rrgtMrgtiTinMlt C7ea r ^70 6 DRILLER A r 7 ^ c z r - ^ ^ ^ s lt7 ^

REMARKS yU7ZlBji^TpoundZyAdpoundAZP^ A Y j P =^^crAA P i c^Z^ S6ZZIZ^P Z^-PPz^

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

I bullPROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE

CO bullz o Q

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ AP j ^ y - ^ ^ ^ o PAlt5P J Plt07

D ^ P A t L S CO bull r iNC to COAnOC G A N D BACKnLL CO My CO

u o gtshyQ BP^PaTTPPP BOREHOLE lt PP L(PP

ID CO HHlt

i2^ bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

1-12 SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

686 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

696^m bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING Aij 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 67 Z z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

WELL N a r y i f ^ - ^ 4 BORING Wo 7J7E2 FILE No C - 3 0 0 Z t t ^ DATE raquoMlaquoTAiiFn ^ - r - ^ - f 6 - P 7

PROJECT C g n f r d I k lt ^ r d - f t l f ^ p S LOCATION

GZA ENGINEER ^ ^ y G u m z n e l y y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A O ^ i i i i n Q XL DS^ WEATHER CONDITIONS C g ^ ^ ^ 8 o S HRII FR X gt ^ tn J ^ P e i r r y REMARKS ALL AAf^ASURrvXeAZPS Ay(P POM P O P O P ( P U A P O y^J7PB

bullGROUND SURFACE

Dejcih -i-o op o f CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL

P V C - O J e A - y i o s h (TYPICALLY 05 THICK)

U^ell Q^posh PROTECrriVE CASING ^ TVPP ^ I T E E L S X H S 6 g ^ f o y i ^ 4rr ^ y ^ r e

p y CO

S e a cuf y4gt 7ltir t7

E 1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

6 y t f ^ ^ a ^00 ^ o UJ y^O 3 47^i7S a bull if 7^ ir o lt SSA7ro 7srz^

CO CpoundMe^ZT bull glMS tQ COARSE SAND BACKF1UU CQ

GlRouT

Q a p p iTo)( traquo^4 y r 7 y

bullBOREHOLE P 6 7

QpoundArrozrr^ Z3 7gt^LL e r CO II

67 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I-12SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (001 SLDTS)

77 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCMX

jpMym

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING J ^ A P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT _ ^ i Z l

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

i^Z^ WELL N a ^ ^ ^ r V ^ BORING Ho AlpoundAl lA-FILE No C-^ltgt(^7-7^ DATE INSTALLED 8 S 8 7 - ^ lt S - 8 7

PROJECT Cezii^c^ l L ^ ^ o 7 A 7 P P ^ S LOCATION John^-f^on 1 PXshyGZA FNfiiMFFR Po S o t raquo ^ e r y C0NTR5CT0R GZA 0^77^^ nc WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl^lt^Y^ S ^ DRILLER - Pe i - f ^y shyZ^yai^CREMARKS bull

QO DEPTH C GROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

-PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE j

CO

o Q

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE oo LJ I a- 7 t 5 e e P a ^ e I cr CO P o r bull FINE lto COARSE SAND aOiCKFILL CQ O e a i l s ID CO 7 u P J i - r e f i o gtshy

-BOREHOLE cc lt Pop OP ROCK 7^2 s

6 PAL CO 76 Z

782 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 9 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

33J BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN S i l jReyroAjrpound pet-ter- SpoundAL ^ 2ycr2e^c^__yoz_7i

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING T P A P L

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 8 2 y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

Thgr ltp7 ^

bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3

FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7

PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP

GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^

WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P

GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION

O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs

UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H

2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y

r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7

Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ

t tr ^ A bull T X V pound

yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO

980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE

lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L

CO 3

m^ j m j

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B

BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7

PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT

K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc

WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE

CO

O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I

L3

LU f o r O e - h a i l s O

if CC

YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt

dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer

CO SfAplusmn37o

J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN

3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z

S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7

PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X

GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co

WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY

o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06

PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P

CO z o p yio

H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3

111

t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt

S ^ A L 3 CO yo

230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)

OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0

GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7

PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R

GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)

l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo

TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s

Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO

O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito

H Q

rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ ^^7ropxpP

p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt

s CO 67

M TOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

lt

CO z o p 3

i j j

a r) CO CQ Z) CO

gtbull a lt 2

CO

DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V

PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp

WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^

REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA

lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^

p p e - 72^

SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L

786

206

BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^

TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn

Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri

T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^

CGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL

-BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC

7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2

DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX

GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7

p d P OP Floe^

CO

O Ishy5 2 0 shy

bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

CJ

UJ

t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T

5poundAt^ 29 q

3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC

WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ

DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c

60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^

REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound

g o DEPTH

ELEVATION

_ pound GROUND SURFICE

I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC

CONCRETE(TYPICALLY

SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)

73PPFOAXrp SEAL

SloL 70

bull bull bull

I bullPROTE

TYPE

ECTIVE CASING bdquo

CO

o

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

C_)

LJ

t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

t l 2S2 O

gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302

322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2

P-^^ nP I ^

WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^

DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72

PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J

GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o

WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

o - t P V C i r o m

f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE Sree^L y x

V

CO

o 70

1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL

bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO

u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO

100

Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

NOTE NOT TO SCALt

vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC

y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19

Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i

ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^

Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O

SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L

CO

o

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

u UJ

t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r

S P A L

CO 3

3 ^

361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)

s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P

S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Jvj-iw-fili

IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A

EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N

^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull

^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^

CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

FOR

RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA

Prepared for the

RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

OCTOBER 1981

CE MAGUIRE INC

PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND

Architects bull Engineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI

October 5 1981 CEM 3869

Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903

Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill

Dear Mr Delfino

In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area

The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing

We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects

Very truly yours

CE MAGUIRE INC

Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager

Enclosure

CMPdw

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

1 INTRODUCTION

2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK

3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX

TABLE NO TITLE

HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

FIGURE NO TITLE

1 LOCATION MAP

2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS

ATTACHMENTS

TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP

BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

FINAL GRADING PLAN

PAGE

1

5

9

PAGE

6

8

PAGE

2

11

DRAWING NO

1

2

3

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 12: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

WELL N a r y i f ^ - ^ 4 BORING Wo 7J7E2 FILE No C - 3 0 0 Z t t ^ DATE raquoMlaquoTAiiFn ^ - r - ^ - f 6 - P 7

PROJECT C g n f r d I k lt ^ r d - f t l f ^ p S LOCATION

GZA ENGINEER ^ ^ y G u m z n e l y y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A O ^ i i i i n Q XL DS^ WEATHER CONDITIONS C g ^ ^ ^ 8 o S HRII FR X gt ^ tn J ^ P e i r r y REMARKS ALL AAf^ASURrvXeAZPS Ay(P POM P O P O P ( P U A P O y^J7PB

bullGROUND SURFACE

Dejcih -i-o op o f CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL

P V C - O J e A - y i o s h (TYPICALLY 05 THICK)

U^ell Q^posh PROTECrriVE CASING ^ TVPP ^ I T E E L S X H S 6 g ^ f o y i ^ 4rr ^ y ^ r e

p y CO

S e a cuf y4gt 7ltir t7

E 1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

6 y t f ^ ^ a ^00 ^ o UJ y^O 3 47^i7S a bull if 7^ ir o lt SSA7ro 7srz^

CO CpoundMe^ZT bull glMS tQ COARSE SAND BACKF1UU CQ

GlRouT

Q a p p iTo)( traquo^4 y r 7 y

bullBOREHOLE P 6 7

QpoundArrozrr^ Z3 7gt^LL e r CO II

67 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I-12SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (001 SLDTS)

77 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCMX

jpMym

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING J ^ A P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT _ ^ i Z l

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

i^Z^ WELL N a ^ ^ ^ r V ^ BORING Ho AlpoundAl lA-FILE No C-^ltgt(^7-7^ DATE INSTALLED 8 S 8 7 - ^ lt S - 8 7

PROJECT Cezii^c^ l L ^ ^ o 7 A 7 P P ^ S LOCATION John^-f^on 1 PXshyGZA FNfiiMFFR Po S o t raquo ^ e r y C0NTR5CT0R GZA 0^77^^ nc WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl^lt^Y^ S ^ DRILLER - Pe i - f ^y shyZ^yai^CREMARKS bull

QO DEPTH C GROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

-PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE j

CO

o Q

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE oo LJ I a- 7 t 5 e e P a ^ e I cr CO P o r bull FINE lto COARSE SAND aOiCKFILL CQ O e a i l s ID CO 7 u P J i - r e f i o gtshy

-BOREHOLE cc lt Pop OP ROCK 7^2 s

6 PAL CO 76 Z

782 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 9 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

33J BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN S i l jReyroAjrpound pet-ter- SpoundAL ^ 2ycr2e^c^__yoz_7i

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING T P A P L

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 8 2 y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

Thgr ltp7 ^

bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3

FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7

PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP

GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^

WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P

GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION

O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs

UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H

2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y

r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7

Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ

t tr ^ A bull T X V pound

yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO

980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE

lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L

CO 3

m^ j m j

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B

BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7

PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT

K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc

WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE

CO

O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I

L3

LU f o r O e - h a i l s O

if CC

YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt

dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer

CO SfAplusmn37o

J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN

3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z

S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7

PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X

GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co

WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY

o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06

PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P

CO z o p yio

H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3

111

t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt

S ^ A L 3 CO yo

230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)

OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0

GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7

PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R

GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)

l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo

TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s

Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO

O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito

H Q

rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ ^^7ropxpP

p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt

s CO 67

M TOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

lt

CO z o p 3

i j j

a r) CO CQ Z) CO

gtbull a lt 2

CO

DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V

PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp

WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^

REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA

lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^

p p e - 72^

SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L

786

206

BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^

TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn

Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri

T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^

CGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL

-BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC

7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2

DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX

GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7

p d P OP Floe^

CO

O Ishy5 2 0 shy

bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

CJ

UJ

t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T

5poundAt^ 29 q

3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC

WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ

DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c

60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^

REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound

g o DEPTH

ELEVATION

_ pound GROUND SURFICE

I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC

CONCRETE(TYPICALLY

SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)

73PPFOAXrp SEAL

SloL 70

bull bull bull

I bullPROTE

TYPE

ECTIVE CASING bdquo

CO

o

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

C_)

LJ

t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

t l 2S2 O

gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302

322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2

P-^^ nP I ^

WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^

DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72

PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J

GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o

WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

o - t P V C i r o m

f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE Sree^L y x

V

CO

o 70

1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL

bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO

u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO

100

Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

NOTE NOT TO SCALt

vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC

y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19

Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i

ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^

Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O

SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L

CO

o

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

u UJ

t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r

S P A L

CO 3

3 ^

361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)

s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P

S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Jvj-iw-fili

IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A

EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N

^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull

^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^

CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

FOR

RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA

Prepared for the

RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

OCTOBER 1981

CE MAGUIRE INC

PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND

Architects bull Engineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI

October 5 1981 CEM 3869

Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903

Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill

Dear Mr Delfino

In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area

The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing

We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects

Very truly yours

CE MAGUIRE INC

Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager

Enclosure

CMPdw

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

1 INTRODUCTION

2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK

3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX

TABLE NO TITLE

HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

FIGURE NO TITLE

1 LOCATION MAP

2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS

ATTACHMENTS

TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP

BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

FINAL GRADING PLAN

PAGE

1

5

9

PAGE

6

8

PAGE

2

11

DRAWING NO

1

2

3

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 13: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

i^Z^ WELL N a ^ ^ ^ r V ^ BORING Ho AlpoundAl lA-FILE No C-^ltgt(^7-7^ DATE INSTALLED 8 S 8 7 - ^ lt S - 8 7

PROJECT Cezii^c^ l L ^ ^ o 7 A 7 P P ^ S LOCATION John^-f^on 1 PXshyGZA FNfiiMFFR Po S o t raquo ^ e r y C0NTR5CT0R GZA 0^77^^ nc WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl^lt^Y^ S ^ DRILLER - Pe i - f ^y shyZ^yai^CREMARKS bull

QO DEPTH C GROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

-PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE j

CO

o Q

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE oo LJ I a- 7 t 5 e e P a ^ e I cr CO P o r bull FINE lto COARSE SAND aOiCKFILL CQ O e a i l s ID CO 7 u P J i - r e f i o gtshy

-BOREHOLE cc lt Pop OP ROCK 7^2 s

6 PAL CO 76 Z

782 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 9 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

33J BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN S i l jReyroAjrpound pet-ter- SpoundAL ^ 2ycr2e^c^__yoz_7i

bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING T P A P L

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 8 2 y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

Thgr ltp7 ^

bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3

FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7

PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP

GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^

WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P

GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION

O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs

UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H

2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y

r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7

Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ

t tr ^ A bull T X V pound

yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO

980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE

lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L

CO 3

m^ j m j

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B

BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7

PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT

K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc

WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE

CO

O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I

L3

LU f o r O e - h a i l s O

if CC

YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt

dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer

CO SfAplusmn37o

J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN

3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z

S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7

PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X

GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co

WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY

o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06

PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P

CO z o p yio

H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3

111

t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt

S ^ A L 3 CO yo

230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)

OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0

GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7

PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R

GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)

l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo

TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s

Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO

O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito

H Q

rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ ^^7ropxpP

p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt

s CO 67

M TOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

lt

CO z o p 3

i j j

a r) CO CQ Z) CO

gtbull a lt 2

CO

DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V

PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp

WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^

REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA

lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^

p p e - 72^

SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L

786

206

BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^

TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn

Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri

T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^

CGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL

-BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC

7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2

DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX

GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7

p d P OP Floe^

CO

O Ishy5 2 0 shy

bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

CJ

UJ

t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T

5poundAt^ 29 q

3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC

WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ

DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c

60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^

REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound

g o DEPTH

ELEVATION

_ pound GROUND SURFICE

I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC

CONCRETE(TYPICALLY

SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)

73PPFOAXrp SEAL

SloL 70

bull bull bull

I bullPROTE

TYPE

ECTIVE CASING bdquo

CO

o

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

C_)

LJ

t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

t l 2S2 O

gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302

322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2

P-^^ nP I ^

WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^

DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72

PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J

GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o

WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

o - t P V C i r o m

f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE Sree^L y x

V

CO

o 70

1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL

bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO

u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO

100

Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

NOTE NOT TO SCALt

vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC

y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19

Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i

ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^

Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O

SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L

CO

o

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

u UJ

t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r

S P A L

CO 3

3 ^

361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)

s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P

S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Jvj-iw-fili

IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A

EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N

^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull

^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^

CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

FOR

RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA

Prepared for the

RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

OCTOBER 1981

CE MAGUIRE INC

PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND

Architects bull Engineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI

October 5 1981 CEM 3869

Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903

Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill

Dear Mr Delfino

In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area

The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing

We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects

Very truly yours

CE MAGUIRE INC

Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager

Enclosure

CMPdw

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

1 INTRODUCTION

2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK

3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX

TABLE NO TITLE

HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

FIGURE NO TITLE

1 LOCATION MAP

2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS

ATTACHMENTS

TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP

BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

FINAL GRADING PLAN

PAGE

1

5

9

PAGE

6

8

PAGE

2

11

DRAWING NO

1

2

3

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 14: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

Thgr ltp7 ^

bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3

FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7

PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP

GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^

WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P

GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION

O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs

UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H

2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y

r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7

Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ

t tr ^ A bull T X V pound

yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO

980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE

lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L

CO 3

m^ j m j

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B

BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7

PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT

K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc

WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE

CO

O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I

L3

LU f o r O e - h a i l s O

if CC

YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt

dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer

CO SfAplusmn37o

J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN

3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z

S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7

PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X

GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co

WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY

o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06

PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P

CO z o p yio

H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3

111

t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt

S ^ A L 3 CO yo

230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)

OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0

GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7

PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R

GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)

l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo

TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s

Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO

O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito

H Q

rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ ^^7ropxpP

p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt

s CO 67

M TOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

lt

CO z o p 3

i j j

a r) CO CQ Z) CO

gtbull a lt 2

CO

DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V

PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp

WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^

REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA

lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^

p p e - 72^

SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L

786

206

BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^

TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn

Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri

T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^

CGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL

-BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC

7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2

DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX

GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7

p d P OP Floe^

CO

O Ishy5 2 0 shy

bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

CJ

UJ

t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T

5poundAt^ 29 q

3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC

WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ

DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c

60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^

REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound

g o DEPTH

ELEVATION

_ pound GROUND SURFICE

I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC

CONCRETE(TYPICALLY

SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)

73PPFOAXrp SEAL

SloL 70

bull bull bull

I bullPROTE

TYPE

ECTIVE CASING bdquo

CO

o

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

C_)

LJ

t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

t l 2S2 O

gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302

322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2

P-^^ nP I ^

WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^

DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72

PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J

GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o

WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

o - t P V C i r o m

f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE Sree^L y x

V

CO

o 70

1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL

bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO

u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO

100

Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

NOTE NOT TO SCALt

vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC

y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19

Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i

ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^

Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O

SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L

CO

o

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

u UJ

t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r

S P A L

CO 3

3 ^

361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)

s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P

S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Jvj-iw-fili

IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A

EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N

^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull

^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^

CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

FOR

RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA

Prepared for the

RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

OCTOBER 1981

CE MAGUIRE INC

PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND

Architects bull Engineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI

October 5 1981 CEM 3869

Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903

Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill

Dear Mr Delfino

In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area

The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing

We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects

Very truly yours

CE MAGUIRE INC

Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager

Enclosure

CMPdw

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

1 INTRODUCTION

2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK

3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX

TABLE NO TITLE

HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

FIGURE NO TITLE

1 LOCATION MAP

2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS

ATTACHMENTS

TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP

BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

FINAL GRADING PLAN

PAGE

1

5

9

PAGE

6

8

PAGE

2

11

DRAWING NO

1

2

3

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 15: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B

BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7

PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT

K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc

WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE

CO

O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I

L3

LU f o r O e - h a i l s O

if CC

YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt

dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer

CO SfAplusmn37o

J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN

3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z

S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7

PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X

GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co

WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY

o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06

PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P

CO z o p yio

H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3

111

t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt

S ^ A L 3 CO yo

230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)

OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0

GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7

PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R

GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)

l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo

TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s

Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO

O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito

H Q

rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ ^^7ropxpP

p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt

s CO 67

M TOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

lt

CO z o p 3

i j j

a r) CO CQ Z) CO

gtbull a lt 2

CO

DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V

PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp

WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^

REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA

lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^

p p e - 72^

SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L

786

206

BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^

TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn

Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri

T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^

CGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL

-BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC

7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2

DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX

GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7

p d P OP Floe^

CO

O Ishy5 2 0 shy

bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

CJ

UJ

t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T

5poundAt^ 29 q

3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC

WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ

DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c

60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^

REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound

g o DEPTH

ELEVATION

_ pound GROUND SURFICE

I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC

CONCRETE(TYPICALLY

SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)

73PPFOAXrp SEAL

SloL 70

bull bull bull

I bullPROTE

TYPE

ECTIVE CASING bdquo

CO

o

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

C_)

LJ

t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

t l 2S2 O

gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302

322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2

P-^^ nP I ^

WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^

DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72

PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J

GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o

WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

o - t P V C i r o m

f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE Sree^L y x

V

CO

o 70

1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL

bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO

u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO

100

Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

NOTE NOT TO SCALt

vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC

y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19

Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i

ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^

Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O

SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L

CO

o

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

u UJ

t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r

S P A L

CO 3

3 ^

361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)

s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P

S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Jvj-iw-fili

IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A

EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N

^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull

^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^

CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

FOR

RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA

Prepared for the

RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

OCTOBER 1981

CE MAGUIRE INC

PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND

Architects bull Engineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI

October 5 1981 CEM 3869

Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903

Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill

Dear Mr Delfino

In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area

The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing

We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects

Very truly yours

CE MAGUIRE INC

Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager

Enclosure

CMPdw

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

1 INTRODUCTION

2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK

3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX

TABLE NO TITLE

HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

FIGURE NO TITLE

1 LOCATION MAP

2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS

ATTACHMENTS

TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP

BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

FINAL GRADING PLAN

PAGE

1

5

9

PAGE

6

8

PAGE

2

11

DRAWING NO

1

2

3

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 16: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7

PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X

GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co

WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY

o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06

PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P

CO z o p yio

H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3

111

t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt

S ^ A L 3 CO yo

230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)

OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0

GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7

PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R

GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)

l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo

TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s

Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO

O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito

H Q

rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ ^^7ropxpP

p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt

s CO 67

M TOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

lt

CO z o p 3

i j j

a r) CO CQ Z) CO

gtbull a lt 2

CO

DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V

PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp

WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^

REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA

lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^

p p e - 72^

SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L

786

206

BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^

TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn

Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri

T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^

CGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL

-BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC

7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2

DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX

GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7

p d P OP Floe^

CO

O Ishy5 2 0 shy

bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

CJ

UJ

t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T

5poundAt^ 29 q

3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC

WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ

DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c

60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^

REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound

g o DEPTH

ELEVATION

_ pound GROUND SURFICE

I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC

CONCRETE(TYPICALLY

SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)

73PPFOAXrp SEAL

SloL 70

bull bull bull

I bullPROTE

TYPE

ECTIVE CASING bdquo

CO

o

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

C_)

LJ

t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

t l 2S2 O

gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302

322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2

P-^^ nP I ^

WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^

DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72

PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J

GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o

WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

o - t P V C i r o m

f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE Sree^L y x

V

CO

o 70

1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL

bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO

u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO

100

Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

NOTE NOT TO SCALt

vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC

y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19

Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i

ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^

Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O

SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L

CO

o

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

u UJ

t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r

S P A L

CO 3

3 ^

361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)

s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P

S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Jvj-iw-fili

IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A

EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N

^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull

^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^

CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

FOR

RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA

Prepared for the

RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

OCTOBER 1981

CE MAGUIRE INC

PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND

Architects bull Engineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI

October 5 1981 CEM 3869

Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903

Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill

Dear Mr Delfino

In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area

The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing

We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects

Very truly yours

CE MAGUIRE INC

Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager

Enclosure

CMPdw

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

1 INTRODUCTION

2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK

3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX

TABLE NO TITLE

HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

FIGURE NO TITLE

1 LOCATION MAP

2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS

ATTACHMENTS

TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP

BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

FINAL GRADING PLAN

PAGE

1

5

9

PAGE

6

8

PAGE

2

11

DRAWING NO

1

2

3

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 17: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7

PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R

GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P

bullGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)

l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo

TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s

Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO

O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito

H Q

rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

O

UJ ^^7ropxpP

p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt

s CO 67

M TOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC

lt

CO z o p 3

i j j

a r) CO CQ Z) CO

gtbull a lt 2

CO

DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V

PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp

WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^

REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA

lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^

p p e - 72^

SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L

786

206

BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^

TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn

Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri

T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^

CGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL

-BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC

7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2

DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX

GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7

p d P OP Floe^

CO

O Ishy5 2 0 shy

bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

CJ

UJ

t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T

5poundAt^ 29 q

3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC

WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ

DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c

60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^

REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound

g o DEPTH

ELEVATION

_ pound GROUND SURFICE

I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC

CONCRETE(TYPICALLY

SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)

73PPFOAXrp SEAL

SloL 70

bull bull bull

I bullPROTE

TYPE

ECTIVE CASING bdquo

CO

o

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

C_)

LJ

t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

t l 2S2 O

gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302

322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2

P-^^ nP I ^

WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^

DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72

PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J

GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o

WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

o - t P V C i r o m

f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE Sree^L y x

V

CO

o 70

1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL

bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO

u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO

100

Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

NOTE NOT TO SCALt

vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC

y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19

Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i

ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^

Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O

SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L

CO

o

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

u UJ

t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r

S P A L

CO 3

3 ^

361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)

s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P

S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Jvj-iw-fili

IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A

EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N

^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull

^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^

CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

FOR

RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA

Prepared for the

RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

OCTOBER 1981

CE MAGUIRE INC

PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND

Architects bull Engineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI

October 5 1981 CEM 3869

Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903

Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill

Dear Mr Delfino

In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area

The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing

We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects

Very truly yours

CE MAGUIRE INC

Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager

Enclosure

CMPdw

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

1 INTRODUCTION

2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK

3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX

TABLE NO TITLE

HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

FIGURE NO TITLE

1 LOCATION MAP

2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS

ATTACHMENTS

TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP

BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

FINAL GRADING PLAN

PAGE

1

5

9

PAGE

6

8

PAGE

2

11

DRAWING NO

1

2

3

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 18: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

lt

CO z o p 3

i j j

a r) CO CQ Z) CO

gtbull a lt 2

CO

DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V

PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp

WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^

REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA

lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^

p p e - 72^

SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L

786

206

BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^

TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn

Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri

T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^

CGROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING

20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE

bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL

-BOREHOLE

bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z

GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC

7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2

DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX

GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7

p d P OP Floe^

CO

O Ishy5 2 0 shy

bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

CJ

UJ

t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T

5poundAt^ 29 q

3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC

WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ

DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c

60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^

REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound

g o DEPTH

ELEVATION

_ pound GROUND SURFICE

I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC

CONCRETE(TYPICALLY

SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)

73PPFOAXrp SEAL

SloL 70

bull bull bull

I bullPROTE

TYPE

ECTIVE CASING bdquo

CO

o

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

C_)

LJ

t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

t l 2S2 O

gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302

322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2

P-^^ nP I ^

WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^

DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72

PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J

GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o

WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

o - t P V C i r o m

f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE Sree^L y x

V

CO

o 70

1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL

bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO

u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO

100

Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

NOTE NOT TO SCALt

vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC

y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19

Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i

ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^

Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O

SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L

CO

o

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

u UJ

t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r

S P A L

CO 3

3 ^

361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)

s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P

S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Jvj-iw-fili

IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A

EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N

^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull

^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^

CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

FOR

RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA

Prepared for the

RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

OCTOBER 1981

CE MAGUIRE INC

PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND

Architects bull Engineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI

October 5 1981 CEM 3869

Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903

Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill

Dear Mr Delfino

In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area

The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing

We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects

Very truly yours

CE MAGUIRE INC

Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager

Enclosure

CMPdw

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

1 INTRODUCTION

2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK

3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX

TABLE NO TITLE

HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

FIGURE NO TITLE

1 LOCATION MAP

2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS

ATTACHMENTS

TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP

BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

FINAL GRADING PLAN

PAGE

1

5

9

PAGE

6

8

PAGE

2

11

DRAWING NO

1

2

3

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 19: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2

DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX

GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7

p d P OP Floe^

CO

O Ishy5 2 0 shy

bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

CJ

UJ

t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO

u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T

5poundAt^ 29 q

3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN

20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC

WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9

DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ

DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c

60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^

REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound

g o DEPTH

ELEVATION

_ pound GROUND SURFICE

I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC

CONCRETE(TYPICALLY

SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)

73PPFOAXrp SEAL

SloL 70

bull bull bull

I bullPROTE

TYPE

ECTIVE CASING bdquo

CO

o

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

C_)

LJ

t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

t l 2S2 O

gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302

322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2

P-^^ nP I ^

WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^

DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72

PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J

GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o

WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

o - t P V C i r o m

f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE Sree^L y x

V

CO

o 70

1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL

bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO

u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO

100

Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

NOTE NOT TO SCALt

vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC

y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19

Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i

ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^

Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O

SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L

CO

o

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

u UJ

t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r

S P A L

CO 3

3 ^

361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)

s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P

S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Jvj-iw-fili

IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A

EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N

^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull

^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^

CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

FOR

RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA

Prepared for the

RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

OCTOBER 1981

CE MAGUIRE INC

PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND

Architects bull Engineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI

October 5 1981 CEM 3869

Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903

Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill

Dear Mr Delfino

In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area

The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing

We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects

Very truly yours

CE MAGUIRE INC

Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager

Enclosure

CMPdw

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

1 INTRODUCTION

2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK

3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX

TABLE NO TITLE

HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

FIGURE NO TITLE

1 LOCATION MAP

2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS

ATTACHMENTS

TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP

BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

FINAL GRADING PLAN

PAGE

1

5

9

PAGE

6

8

PAGE

2

11

DRAWING NO

1

2

3

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 20: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ

DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c

60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^

REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound

g o DEPTH

ELEVATION

_ pound GROUND SURFICE

I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC

CONCRETE(TYPICALLY

SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)

73PPFOAXrp SEAL

SloL 70

bull bull bull

I bullPROTE

TYPE

ECTIVE CASING bdquo

CO

o

1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

C_)

LJ

t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ

CO

t l 2S2 O

gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302

322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2

P-^^ nP I ^

WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^

DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72

PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J

GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o

WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

o - t P V C i r o m

f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE Sree^L y x

V

CO

o 70

1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL

bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO

u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO

100

Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

NOTE NOT TO SCALt

vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC

y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19

Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i

ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^

Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O

SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L

CO

o

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

u UJ

t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r

S P A L

CO 3

3 ^

361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)

s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P

S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Jvj-iw-fili

IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A

EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N

^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull

^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^

CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

FOR

RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA

Prepared for the

RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

OCTOBER 1981

CE MAGUIRE INC

PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND

Architects bull Engineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI

October 5 1981 CEM 3869

Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903

Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill

Dear Mr Delfino

In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area

The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing

We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects

Very truly yours

CE MAGUIRE INC

Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager

Enclosure

CMPdw

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

1 INTRODUCTION

2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK

3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX

TABLE NO TITLE

HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

FIGURE NO TITLE

1 LOCATION MAP

2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS

ATTACHMENTS

TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP

BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

FINAL GRADING PLAN

PAGE

1

5

9

PAGE

6

8

PAGE

2

11

DRAWING NO

1

2

3

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 21: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

P-^^ nP I ^

WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^

DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72

PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J

GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o

WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p

GROUND SURFACE

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)

o - t P V C i r o m

f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING

TYPE Sree^L y x

V

CO

o 70

1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL

bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO

u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO

100

Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)

BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

NOTE NOT TO SCALt

vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y

GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC

y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19

Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i

ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^

Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O

SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L

CO

o

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

u UJ

t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r

S P A L

CO 3

3 ^

361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)

s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P

S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Jvj-iw-fili

IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A

EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N

^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull

^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^

CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

FOR

RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA

Prepared for the

RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

OCTOBER 1981

CE MAGUIRE INC

PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND

Architects bull Engineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI

October 5 1981 CEM 3869

Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903

Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill

Dear Mr Delfino

In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area

The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing

We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects

Very truly yours

CE MAGUIRE INC

Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager

Enclosure

CMPdw

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

1 INTRODUCTION

2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK

3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX

TABLE NO TITLE

HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

FIGURE NO TITLE

1 LOCATION MAP

2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS

ATTACHMENTS

TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP

BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

FINAL GRADING PLAN

PAGE

1

5

9

PAGE

6

8

PAGE

2

11

DRAWING NO

1

2

3

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 22: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19

Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i

ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P

g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE

ELEVATION

CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^

Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O

SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L

CO

o

bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE

u UJ

t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r

S P A L

CO 3

3 ^

361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN

l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)

s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN

poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P

S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING

NOTE NOT TO SCALE

DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _

GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC

Jvj-iw-fili

IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A

EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N

^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull

^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^

CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

FOR

RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA

Prepared for the

RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

OCTOBER 1981

CE MAGUIRE INC

PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND

Architects bull Engineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI

October 5 1981 CEM 3869

Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903

Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill

Dear Mr Delfino

In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area

The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing

We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects

Very truly yours

CE MAGUIRE INC

Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager

Enclosure

CMPdw

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

1 INTRODUCTION

2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK

3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX

TABLE NO TITLE

HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

FIGURE NO TITLE

1 LOCATION MAP

2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS

ATTACHMENTS

TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP

BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

FINAL GRADING PLAN

PAGE

1

5

9

PAGE

6

8

PAGE

2

11

DRAWING NO

1

2

3

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 23: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

Jvj-iw-fili

IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A

EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N

^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull

^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^

CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

FOR

RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA

Prepared for the

RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

OCTOBER 1981

CE MAGUIRE INC

PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND

Architects bull Engineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI

October 5 1981 CEM 3869

Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903

Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill

Dear Mr Delfino

In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area

The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing

We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects

Very truly yours

CE MAGUIRE INC

Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager

Enclosure

CMPdw

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

1 INTRODUCTION

2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK

3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX

TABLE NO TITLE

HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

FIGURE NO TITLE

1 LOCATION MAP

2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS

ATTACHMENTS

TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP

BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

FINAL GRADING PLAN

PAGE

1

5

9

PAGE

6

8

PAGE

2

11

DRAWING NO

1

2

3

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 24: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

FOR

RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA

Prepared for the

RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

OCTOBER 1981

CE MAGUIRE INC

PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND

Architects bull Engineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI

October 5 1981 CEM 3869

Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903

Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill

Dear Mr Delfino

In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area

The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing

We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects

Very truly yours

CE MAGUIRE INC

Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager

Enclosure

CMPdw

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

1 INTRODUCTION

2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK

3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX

TABLE NO TITLE

HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

FIGURE NO TITLE

1 LOCATION MAP

2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS

ATTACHMENTS

TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP

BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

FINAL GRADING PLAN

PAGE

1

5

9

PAGE

6

8

PAGE

2

11

DRAWING NO

1

2

3

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 25: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

Architects bull Engineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI

October 5 1981 CEM 3869

Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903

Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill

Dear Mr Delfino

In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area

The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing

We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects

Very truly yours

CE MAGUIRE INC

Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager

Enclosure

CMPdw

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

1 INTRODUCTION

2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK

3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX

TABLE NO TITLE

HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

FIGURE NO TITLE

1 LOCATION MAP

2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS

ATTACHMENTS

TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP

BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

FINAL GRADING PLAN

PAGE

1

5

9

PAGE

6

8

PAGE

2

11

DRAWING NO

1

2

3

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 26: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

1 INTRODUCTION

2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK

3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES

APPENDIX

TABLE NO TITLE

HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

FIGURE NO TITLE

1 LOCATION MAP

2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS

ATTACHMENTS

TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP

BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP

FINAL GRADING PLAN

PAGE

1

5

9

PAGE

6

8

PAGE

2

11

DRAWING NO

1

2

3

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 27: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

Background

On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981

The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report

Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area

The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979

Summary of Facility Operation

In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows

Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil

-1shy

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 28: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^

j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P

yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^

py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y

FIGURE NOJ_^

-bull^^o

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 29: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial

Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres

Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months

The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt

The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time

Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material

Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979

In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in

-3shy

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 30: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses

-4shy

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 31: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

SECTION 2

MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year

Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM

In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1

The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program

It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples

s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)

Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be

-5shy

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 32: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

TABLE 1

HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS

Well Number

E

F

I G

J

K

L

M

Surface Elevation

38965

38208

39767

36245

38205

38008

3913

Top Pipe Elevation

39263

38458

39997

36516

38471

38203

39205

Bedrock Elevation

3866

3740

3797

3464

3528

3526

3745

Well Depth (Feet)

250

250

275

225

345

349

235

Water Elevation Taken 9981

37805

36987

37147

35015

NA

35376

37955

Remarks

sealed 358-2 installed 82580

sealed 3729 installed 82280

sealed 3698 installed 82880

sealed Q 34845 installed 82681

sealed 35755 installed 82081

sealed 35458 installed 81881

sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 33: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence

The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations

Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

-7shy

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 34: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

TABLE 2

MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE

TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES

Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics

Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag

-8shy

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 35: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

SECTION 3

CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES

Closure Program

The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows

1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle

2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment

3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet

4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area

5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981

6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area

-9shy

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 36: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B

Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel

Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept

- T C L ^

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 37: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

FIGURE NO 2

MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL

VEGETATION

2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi

w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L

DRAINAGE CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)

Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners

CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 38: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

COST ESTIMATES

Capital Costs

Item

Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel

Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix

Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal

Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel

Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc

Water Sampling Bailers

Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision

Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent

Quantity

7400 cy

2900 cy

1400 cy

90 cy 90 cy

170 sq yd

4

37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs

24 hrs 24 hrs

Unit Cost Installed

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 125cy

$ 050cy $ 100cy

$ 045sq yd

$4500each

$ 0l6sq ft 30000

750hr 1000hr

$ 750hr $6000hr

Subtotal

Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis

TOTAL

Based on use of on-site materials

Total Cost

$ 9250

3625

1750

45 90

80

180

6000 300 150 40

180 1440

$23130

18025

$41155

Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period

-12shy

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 39: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

Operation Costs

Monitoring Program

Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625

Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000

Total Monitoring Costs

to Year 30

$150625

General Maintenance

Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at

$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30

$ 29250

$179875

Assuming no increase in laboratory fees

-13-

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 40: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

APPENDIX A

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 41: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

GUILD DP100 WATER STREET

TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s

REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e

SAMPLES SENT TO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

A I after Hours

1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0

LOCATION OF BORING

LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I

lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I

PROJ NO

OUR JOB NO

CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS

Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30

a Ul o

Casing Blows

per (oot

Sample Depttis

F rom- To

0-l6

3-8

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sompler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

22 30 53

Moisture

Density or

Consist Mois t ve ry dense

Strata

Ctionge

Elev bull

3

8-13

13-18

18-23

23-25 25

81-65

CORE BAR

NXST

BIT D i a

SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE

HOLE NO BH-28

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dare TifTit

START 8 2 2 8 0

COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No

Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy

Quartz Seams 02

C3

very hard

04

C5

Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid

One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up

GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY

iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 42: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )

DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO

C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA

PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650

SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV

Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type

CASING

NW

SAMPLER

SS

CORE BAR

N X S T START COMPLETE

8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0

A l 1 2 f ter 82880

-Hours

Size ID

Hammer Wf

Hammer Foil

3 300

24

1 3 8 140

30 BIT

D i a

TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR

[MAN P Br e s c i i

LOCATION OF BORING

XK UJ

o

Casing Blows

per foot

Somple Depths

From- To

Type of

Somple

Blows per 6 on Sampler

From To

0-6 I 6-12 12-18

Moisture

Density or

Consist

Strolo

Change

Elev

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc

0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt

Wood - FILL 5

5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr

8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE

very hard

13-18

18-21

(Quartz Seams)21-25

25 Bottom of Boring 25

Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25

GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt

troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring

10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 43: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

J

RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^

OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn

MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -

1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR

5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S

m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0

I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS

s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo

Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR

1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of

Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist

bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18

v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense

I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r

bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I

I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )

I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t

1 7 6

I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d

I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60

I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24

I 2 7 6

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6

I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l

1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock

I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up

I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6

sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin

10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 44: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

i

SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF

U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J

TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA

O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r

1 Type

_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil

j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1

Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler

per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18

0 - l 6 D 9 9 12

1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q

K

1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C

bull

n

_

1

CASING

W I

^ Stgtun

Mois tu re

Dens i ty or

Cons is t

D r y m e d i u m d e n s e

W e t v e r y d e n s e

W e t d e n s e

SAMPLER

C C j i ^

1 3 8 300^^

2 4

Strata Change

Elev

1 3 6

2 2 6

Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0

bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z

D i a SOtlSFNTR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec

Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )

B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t

c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n

T o p o f R o c k

G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0

C2 4 8 45

B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6

bull bull - mdash 1

GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d

ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 45: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI

UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET

REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV

Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START

A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS

At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR

LOCATION OF BORING

Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density

UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev

20 Approx bottom of Refuse

2411 2911

2411 Top of Possible Rock

Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured

cT UP

2911 shybull^An

C2 60

GROUt^D SURFACE TO

Somple Type

DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest

USED

Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5

3411 Bottom of Boring 3411

Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe

2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN

1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density

0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -

Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f

SUMMA ^Eorth Boring

Rock Coring IJ Somples

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 46: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE

100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I

JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING

At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID

At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall

LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler

Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To

foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist

0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e

O Somple

2 - 4 6 0

5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e

1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e

(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit

176-236 C

SAMPLER

SS 1 3 8

300 30

Strata

Chonge

Elev

2

46

176

236

3869 82-54

CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE

BH-M HOLE NO _ 1

LINE a STA

OFFSET

SURF ELEV

Dote Time

8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1

TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T

BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR

SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc

Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l

Boulder

Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles

(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder

Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt

Gray Brown GRANITE

(poss boulders)

(Sand amp Silt return in

drill water)

Bottom of Boring 236

Observation Well 235

10 Slotted

14 Solid

SAMPLE

No Pen

18

30^

18T

18

Cl 72

GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN

Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0

0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 47: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

APPENDIX B

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 48: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

Grass and Legumes

Mix A (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90

Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required

Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic

condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes

and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically

Mix B (No loam required)

NAME by Weight Purity Germination

Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85

Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate

acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 49: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

Shrubs

For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones

Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows

SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS

White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils

Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil

Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions

Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 50: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt

bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy

bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull

bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -

iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^

i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r

8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt

LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y

bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^

3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr

- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )

-pp w

lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f

y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^

N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull

Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based

bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981

bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i

bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull

ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^

bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--

bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-

I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-

n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH

-V iViT- i gtfr bull

r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull

bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^

^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp

| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe

J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island

p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^

pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull

7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V

Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^

tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7

Page 51: JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR, . NICHOLAS A. CAMPAGNA JR,. … · present by OSHA to GZA's field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZA's two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency

O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo

c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ

EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515

Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3

WP

z ^7 IP7


Recommended