V DONALD T GOLDBERG WILLIAM S ZOINO JOSEPH D GUERTIN JR JOHN E AYRES Yj3i i - t^laquo I I I I _ MATTHEW J BARVENIK ozv WILLIAM R BELOFF NICHOLAS A CAMPAGNA JR MATHEW A DIPILATO CARL EIDAM LAWRENCE FELDMAN
G O L D B E R G bull ZOINO S A S S O C I A T E S INC G E O T E C H N I C A L - G E O H Y D R O L O G I C A L C O N S U L T A N T S JOSEPH P HEHIR
ROBERT A HELLER ROSS T McGILLIVRAY MICHAEL A POWERS JAMES H REYNOLDS PAUL M SANBORN RICHARD M SIMON STEVEN J TRETTEL
CONSULTANTS
WALTER E JAWORSKI JR STANLEY M BEMBEN VITO A NACCI
FRANK W CLARK RE DISTRICT MANAGER
October 15 1987 File No C-3002714shy
Mr David D Dorocz RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 260 West Exchange Street Providence RI 02903
Re Central Landfill RIFS Progress Report 5 Work Period September 11 1987 to October 11 1987
Dear Mr Dorocz
This letter report serves as the fifth progress report prepared by Goldberg-Zoino amp Associates Inc (GZA) associated with activities completed to date on the Central Landfill Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS) This progress report has been prepared in accordance with the provision of section 620 of the February 1985 Work Plan prepared by GZA
Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to call me
Very truly yours
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
^ y ^ ^ y L gt ^ p Hartley
Project Manager
JPHlam Attachment
Copyright 1987 Goldberg-Zoino amp Associates Inc
140 BROADWAY raquo PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND 02903 raquo (401) 421-4140 NEWTON UPPER FALLS MA laquo BUFFALO NY bull BRIDGEPORT CT laquo VERNON CT bull MANCHESTER NH
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
I ^
KEY PERSONNEL CHANGES
The GZA project team has not changed since submission of the first progress report Michael A Powers remains as Associateshyin-Charge John P Hartley services as Project Manager and Site Safety Officer Edward A Summerly and Norbert J Schulz presently serves as lead project engineers
GZX
ANTICIPATED PROBLEMSUNRESOLVED ISSUES
1) GZA awaits EPA formal comments on air monitoring plan
2)
3)
GZA awaits EPA formal comments on sampling plan
GZA awaits schedule and scope of work for USGSgeophysical effort
down-hole
4) GZA awaits FS work plan from Wehren Engineering
UPCOMING EVENTSACTIVITIES PLANNED
EVENTACTIVITY
1) WE 87 ML-4 Boring
2) WE 87 ML-3 Boring
3) WE 87-13 Boring
4) Test Pit Explorations
5) VSP Work
6) Multilevel Sampler Installation
7) Surface WaterSediment Sampling
8) Groundwater Sampling
ANTICIPATED START DATE (WEEK OF)
October 18
November 1
November 1 (Dependent on Availability of Drill Rig)
November 8
November 15
November 22
November 22
November 22
GZX
PROGRESS MADE THIS REPORTING PERIOD
1) Meeting is held on September 10 1987 at the Central Landfill to discuss and field reconnaissance the locations of the five multi-level wells Present at the meeting were Ken Wenger and John Zannos (EPA) David Dorocz (RISWMC) Mark Brickie (CDM) John Hartley and Edward Summerly (GZA) the original intent of the meeting was to field locate the multi-level wells based on local topographical features ie outcrops distinct topographical depression etc At the completion of the effort it was recognized that such features are not readily apparent at the site Accordingly a mutual agreement was reached to locate the wells based on URI geophysicalfracture trace work and to proceed with this approach until URI could be contacted to address rationale for their selection of well locations (Note since that time numerous calls made by EPA and GZA to reach Dr Frolich have been unsuccessful)
2) Well installation completed during this drilling period is as follows
Guild commenced drilling at borehole location WE87-ML2 on September 14 1987 using the air percussion method Bedrock was encountered at 15 feet(+) and was drilled to a depth of 155 feet The borehole was then pressure tested and developed between September 28 and October 1 All equipment was then steam cleaned on October 2 1987 Guild commenced drilling borehole WE87-ML1 on October 5 using the air percussion method Bedrock was encountered at 21 feet ( + ) and was drilled to a depth of 210 feet The borehole was then pressure tested on October 14 and 15 AH equipment was then steam cleaned and moved to borehole location WE87-ML5 on October 15
Guild Drilling Co commenced drilling at borehole location WE87-4 on August 17 1987 Bedrock was encountered at 15 feet ( + ) and was cored to a depth of 4 6 feet The borehole was pressure tested and one observation well was installed to a depth of 36 feet and sealed in rock on August 21 All equipment was then steam cleaned prior to beginning the next borehole
GZA Drilling Inc arrived back on-site on September 15 1987 to begin drilling in the former hazardous waste disposal area Drilling on borehole location WE87-1A commenced on September 15 and was terminated at a depth of 3 3 feet (+) on October 18 The borehole was terminated due to the subsurface conditions which were different from those anticipated in the closure area
On September 18 19 87 Mr Summerly and Mr Doorley located the center of the closure area based upon a plan titled Hazardous Waste Area Closing by C E Maquire dated September 1981 This new location was designated WE87-1B and drilling at this location was begun on September 21 1987 Bedrock was encountered at 367 feet (+) and was drilled to a depth of 53 feet and then cored to a depth of 68 feet
Two observation wells were installed at this location between September 28 and 30 Well WE87-1B-B was installed to a depth of 67 feet and sealed in bedrock Well WE87-1B-A was installed to a depth of 368 feet in fill material The remainder of the borehole was then sealed using a bentonite grout
Borehole WE87-1C was performed approximately 20 feet to the southeast of location WE87-1B on September 30 1987 Soils at this location were sampled continuously down from the surface in an attempt to recover a sample of the PVC cap material A sample of this material was recovered from a depth of 77 feet (plusmn) Based upon a discussion between Mr Ken Wenger and Mr Hartley this borehole was terminated at a depth of 8 feet and sealed with bentonite grout on October 1 1987 GZA Drilling Inc left the site on October 1 1987 after steam cleaning all equipment
3) On September 22 1987 Mr Ralph L Gumpert an industrial hygienist with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) conducted an unannounced inspection of the CLF WE87-1 drilling activities The inspection resulted in verbal comments present by OSHA to GZAs field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZAs two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency communication devices
4) September 22 1987 meeting is held with Wehren Engineering GZA subcontractor responsible for preparation of the feasibility study to discuss the project and scope of work Wehren is currently preparing an FS work plan and is developing contract documents for GZAs review
5) Several problems associated with the drilling effort were encountered On September 23 1987 GZA spoke with Ken Wenger about these problems and to agree upon a solution
RIAL and GZA personnel had begun development of landfill well WE87-3 using a submissible air lift pump At the completion of this effort after removing at least the volume of water introduced to the well during packer testing it was realized the well had significantly shifted because of landfill operations conducted in the near vicinity of the well After repeated efforts over several days to remove the pump it was successfully removed from the well This experience made it obvious that the real potential exists for loosing this well because of significant well movement and potential breakage of the casing Accordingly GZA requested EPAs verbal comments andor approval of GZAs proposed sampling plan so that groundwater samples could be collected from all landfill wells as soon as possible to avoid the risk of eventual well loss EPA was informed that GZA and RIAL will proceed with well sampling the next week using the proposed plan unless we hear otherwise EPA was agreeable to this approach but suggested we contact CDM to determine status of their plan review On September 24 1987 GZA contacted CDM T Pederson was not in at that time On September 25 1987 CDM
returned phone call at which time it was noted that the sampling plan had not been review GZA presented their concerns over well shifting and potential problems CDM agreed and committed to present comments by the following week
The second drilling issue that emerged during this period involved drilling on the former hazardous waste disposal area (WE87-1) The location of this boring was selected based on recommendations made Jim Doorley (RISWMC) based his best recollection of the locations of the hazardous waste trenches relative to the capped area Observations made while drilling at the location resulted in the determination that the boring was most likely not within the capped portion of the waste cell At the same time RISWMC provided GZA with a copy of a closure plan prepared for the RISWMC by C E Maguire (copy enclosed)
Based on a map showing the location of the waste cell in that closure plan GZA relocated the WE87-1 boring to the approximate center of the apparent capped area This information was presented to EPA during our September 23 1987 phone conversation
6) On September 25 1987 GZA spoke with John Zannos (EPA) regarding EPAs position concerning the use of drilling foam during the advancement of the multi-level wells The use of foam had been suggested by Guild Drilling Co to help remove rock fragments in the wells which result in lower drilling rates EPAs position with regard to the use of foam were (1) it could not be used (2) foaming agents often contain organic constituents and (3) can only be used if we risk loosing the hole and only after EPA approval GZA acknowledged position and transferred information to Guild Drilling
7) On September 30 1987 another drilling issue emerged with regard to drilling at the WE87-1 location Following the completion of drilling and installation of sampling wells at this location GZA moved the drill rig approximately 20 feet to the south of the WE87-1 boring in order to more accurately assess surface conditions within the capped area ie the presence of fly ash (Note this intensive sampling effort was beyond the agreed upon approach which involved sampling at 5-foot intervals until fly ash material was encountered for 10 feet) At a depth of approximately 77 feet the liner material was encountered This observation supports observed condition in WE87-1 suggesting that we have successfully installed a well within the capped region of site GZA does not suggest that it was determined that the well is placed within a former disposal trench since this was not the primary objective of this effort and not part of GZAs Scope of Work or Work Plan Recommendations were made to GZA by CDM to continue drilling at this location to bedrock The objective of this recommendation was not presented GZA did not agree with this approach since it essentially commits us to an additional week of drilling without a clear objective Accordingly the hole was terminated at approximately 77 feet
and grout filled This information and GZAs approach was presented to RISWMC and EPA Both parties agreed with our approach EPA committed that if warranted they may require GZA to return to this area to perform additional testing GZA acknowledged with the understanding that additional drilling activities are outside the present Scope of Work and therefore must result in contractual consent agreemervE) and schedule modifications TTT bullmdash
8) GZA reviewed RIDOH residential well sampling data this reporting period and began incorporation of this data along with the EPACDM residential well results onto a survey map which indicates location of sampling points well status (activeinactive) and the current or planned status of the Johnston water supply lines Of cruciai significance in this effort is the fact that the RIDOH sampling location are relative only ie street name without address number This hampers GZAs efforts in accurately assessing potential seeks off-site impacts and therefore we seek EPAs assistance in obtaining more detailed information
9) On October 14 1987 GZA returned a call to John Zannos (EPA) at which time information relative to drilling status was presented John presented concerns over drilling efforts at the WE87-1 location based on CDMs comments Although the specifics were not known it was discussed that GZA may not have been proceeding with agreed upon approach GZA noted that they felt they had and sought to resolve any outstanding issues It was agreed to talk about perceived problems at the upcoming October 23 1987 meeting EPA also noted concern over size of borehole (multi-level wells) which may make them incompatible with Waterloo systems EPA suggested that EPA contact Weston Geophysical to perform caliper logging measurements prior to ordering Waterloo system GZA agreed
10) Air monitoring was initiated at the site also during this period The air sampling was conductance in accordance with GZA revised air monitoring plan and based on verbal comments presented to GZA from CDM The air monitoring effort involved the collection of air samples upwind and downwind of the WE87-1 drilling location during and subsequent to drilling In addition to the preliminary air monitoring effort which was designed to address logistical and analytical considerations four additional rounds have or will be completed at the site
GZX
PROBLEMS RESOLVED
1) GZA receives RIDOH residential well sampling data
GZX
V
DATE INSTALLED ^ ^ ^ f ^ ^ ^ T J ^ J PRmFCT z^^^ t^^ ^^ c y y y^7=s LOCATION
GZAENGIMFFR ^ f ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ gt ^ X ^ ^ mMTRATTnP
BORING Wo U7pound f t - tG FILE No C^QOHt- lR
y i ^ r c ^ y i
(S^ ZA 7 gt - y SZT^i^
WEATHER mKiniTinM ^ - y ^ cy ^ npii ^ FR y i ^ h u i y j ^ ^ ^ v T c K
REMARKS A U y 7 E l Q U R M pound y V 7 ^ A R ^ 7=-y0Z
A D e p ^ h -fc o p a - f
tn
o H 3 J 3 EvroAOT^
(SPOUT o UJ
oc
CO 03
CO
u o 211 gtshycc lt QepToATre
PPLLET 5 pound A L
CO
7 8 ^
Asyli
- T P P O r 6 U A f lt D P X P ^
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
bullPROTECTIVE CASING ^ - i
bull1-12 SCHO 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE SAND BflCKOLL
BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (QOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO S C M X
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ss DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT r 9 i H y
cOLOBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
cc
BORING Mn 7Z7poundf^7-77i FILE No r-laquo^gr^ DATE INSTALLED f ^ f - ^ ^ -30 - ^7
PROJECT Sf in ^^^^oA PXPS LOCATION L^^ J ylty ^ zeuro^
GZA EhiGlNFFR P^^y S i ^ ^ - ^ Z Y y CONTRACTOR G Z A lt^^^^-^^ 3^^ C
WEATHER rrgtMrgtiTinMlt C7ea r ^70 6 DRILLER A r 7 ^ c z r - ^ ^ ^ s lt7 ^
REMARKS yU7ZlBji^TpoundZyAdpoundAZP^ A Y j P =^^crAA P i c^Z^ S6ZZIZ^P Z^-PPz^
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
I bullPROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE
CO bullz o Q
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ AP j ^ y - ^ ^ ^ o PAlt5P J Plt07
D ^ P A t L S CO bull r iNC to COAnOC G A N D BACKnLL CO My CO
u o gtshyQ BP^PaTTPPP BOREHOLE lt PP L(PP
ID CO HHlt
i2^ bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
1-12 SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
686 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
696^m bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING Aij 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 67 Z z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
WELL N a r y i f ^ - ^ 4 BORING Wo 7J7E2 FILE No C - 3 0 0 Z t t ^ DATE raquoMlaquoTAiiFn ^ - r - ^ - f 6 - P 7
PROJECT C g n f r d I k lt ^ r d - f t l f ^ p S LOCATION
GZA ENGINEER ^ ^ y G u m z n e l y y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A O ^ i i i i n Q XL DS^ WEATHER CONDITIONS C g ^ ^ ^ 8 o S HRII FR X gt ^ tn J ^ P e i r r y REMARKS ALL AAf^ASURrvXeAZPS Ay(P POM P O P O P ( P U A P O y^J7PB
bullGROUND SURFACE
Dejcih -i-o op o f CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL
P V C - O J e A - y i o s h (TYPICALLY 05 THICK)
U^ell Q^posh PROTECrriVE CASING ^ TVPP ^ I T E E L S X H S 6 g ^ f o y i ^ 4rr ^ y ^ r e
p y CO
S e a cuf y4gt 7ltir t7
E 1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
6 y t f ^ ^ a ^00 ^ o UJ y^O 3 47^i7S a bull if 7^ ir o lt SSA7ro 7srz^
CO CpoundMe^ZT bull glMS tQ COARSE SAND BACKF1UU CQ
GlRouT
Q a p p iTo)( traquo^4 y r 7 y
bullBOREHOLE P 6 7
QpoundArrozrr^ Z3 7gt^LL e r CO II
67 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I-12SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (001 SLDTS)
77 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCMX
jpMym
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING J ^ A P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT _ ^ i Z l
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
i^Z^ WELL N a ^ ^ ^ r V ^ BORING Ho AlpoundAl lA-FILE No C-^ltgt(^7-7^ DATE INSTALLED 8 S 8 7 - ^ lt S - 8 7
PROJECT Cezii^c^ l L ^ ^ o 7 A 7 P P ^ S LOCATION John^-f^on 1 PXshyGZA FNfiiMFFR Po S o t raquo ^ e r y C0NTR5CT0R GZA 0^77^^ nc WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl^lt^Y^ S ^ DRILLER - Pe i - f ^y shyZ^yai^CREMARKS bull
QO DEPTH C GROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
-PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE j
CO
o Q
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE oo LJ I a- 7 t 5 e e P a ^ e I cr CO P o r bull FINE lto COARSE SAND aOiCKFILL CQ O e a i l s ID CO 7 u P J i - r e f i o gtshy
-BOREHOLE cc lt Pop OP ROCK 7^2 s
6 PAL CO 76 Z
782 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 9 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
33J BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN S i l jReyroAjrpound pet-ter- SpoundAL ^ 2ycr2e^c^__yoz_7i
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING T P A P L
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 8 2 y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
Thgr ltp7 ^
bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3
FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7
PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP
GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^
WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P
GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs
UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H
2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y
r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7
Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ
t tr ^ A bull T X V pound
yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO
980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE
lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L
CO 3
m^ j m j
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B
BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7
PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT
K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc
WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE
CO
O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I
L3
LU f o r O e - h a i l s O
if CC
YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt
dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer
CO SfAplusmn37o
J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN
3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z
S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7
PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X
GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co
WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY
o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06
PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P
CO z o p yio
H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3
111
t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt
S ^ A L 3 CO yo
230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)
OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0
GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7
PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R
GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)
l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo
TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s
Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO
O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito
H Q
rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ ^^7ropxpP
p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt
s CO 67
M TOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
lt
CO z o p 3
i j j
a r) CO CQ Z) CO
gtbull a lt 2
CO
DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V
PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp
WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^
REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA
lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^
p p e - 72^
SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L
786
206
BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^
TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn
Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri
T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^
CGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL
-BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC
7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2
DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX
GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7
p d P OP Floe^
CO
O Ishy5 2 0 shy
bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
CJ
UJ
t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T
5poundAt^ 29 q
3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC
WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ
DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c
60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^
REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound
g o DEPTH
ELEVATION
_ pound GROUND SURFICE
I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC
CONCRETE(TYPICALLY
SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)
73PPFOAXrp SEAL
SloL 70
bull bull bull
I bullPROTE
TYPE
ECTIVE CASING bdquo
CO
o
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
C_)
LJ
t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
t l 2S2 O
gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302
322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2
P-^^ nP I ^
WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^
DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72
PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J
GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o
WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
o - t P V C i r o m
f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE Sree^L y x
V
CO
o 70
1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL
bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO
u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO
100
Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
NOTE NOT TO SCALt
vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC
y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19
Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i
ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^
Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O
SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L
CO
o
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
u UJ
t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r
S P A L
CO 3
3 ^
361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)
s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P
S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Jvj-iw-fili
IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A
EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N
^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull
^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^
CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA
Prepared for the
RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
OCTOBER 1981
CE MAGUIRE INC
PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND
Architects bull Engineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI
October 5 1981 CEM 3869
Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903
Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill
Dear Mr Delfino
In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area
The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects
Very truly yours
CE MAGUIRE INC
Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager
Enclosure
CMPdw
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK
3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX
TABLE NO TITLE
HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
FIGURE NO TITLE
1 LOCATION MAP
2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
FINAL GRADING PLAN
PAGE
1
5
9
PAGE
6
8
PAGE
2
11
DRAWING NO
1
2
3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
I ^
KEY PERSONNEL CHANGES
The GZA project team has not changed since submission of the first progress report Michael A Powers remains as Associateshyin-Charge John P Hartley services as Project Manager and Site Safety Officer Edward A Summerly and Norbert J Schulz presently serves as lead project engineers
GZX
ANTICIPATED PROBLEMSUNRESOLVED ISSUES
1) GZA awaits EPA formal comments on air monitoring plan
2)
3)
GZA awaits EPA formal comments on sampling plan
GZA awaits schedule and scope of work for USGSgeophysical effort
down-hole
4) GZA awaits FS work plan from Wehren Engineering
UPCOMING EVENTSACTIVITIES PLANNED
EVENTACTIVITY
1) WE 87 ML-4 Boring
2) WE 87 ML-3 Boring
3) WE 87-13 Boring
4) Test Pit Explorations
5) VSP Work
6) Multilevel Sampler Installation
7) Surface WaterSediment Sampling
8) Groundwater Sampling
ANTICIPATED START DATE (WEEK OF)
October 18
November 1
November 1 (Dependent on Availability of Drill Rig)
November 8
November 15
November 22
November 22
November 22
GZX
PROGRESS MADE THIS REPORTING PERIOD
1) Meeting is held on September 10 1987 at the Central Landfill to discuss and field reconnaissance the locations of the five multi-level wells Present at the meeting were Ken Wenger and John Zannos (EPA) David Dorocz (RISWMC) Mark Brickie (CDM) John Hartley and Edward Summerly (GZA) the original intent of the meeting was to field locate the multi-level wells based on local topographical features ie outcrops distinct topographical depression etc At the completion of the effort it was recognized that such features are not readily apparent at the site Accordingly a mutual agreement was reached to locate the wells based on URI geophysicalfracture trace work and to proceed with this approach until URI could be contacted to address rationale for their selection of well locations (Note since that time numerous calls made by EPA and GZA to reach Dr Frolich have been unsuccessful)
2) Well installation completed during this drilling period is as follows
Guild commenced drilling at borehole location WE87-ML2 on September 14 1987 using the air percussion method Bedrock was encountered at 15 feet(+) and was drilled to a depth of 155 feet The borehole was then pressure tested and developed between September 28 and October 1 All equipment was then steam cleaned on October 2 1987 Guild commenced drilling borehole WE87-ML1 on October 5 using the air percussion method Bedrock was encountered at 21 feet ( + ) and was drilled to a depth of 210 feet The borehole was then pressure tested on October 14 and 15 AH equipment was then steam cleaned and moved to borehole location WE87-ML5 on October 15
Guild Drilling Co commenced drilling at borehole location WE87-4 on August 17 1987 Bedrock was encountered at 15 feet ( + ) and was cored to a depth of 4 6 feet The borehole was pressure tested and one observation well was installed to a depth of 36 feet and sealed in rock on August 21 All equipment was then steam cleaned prior to beginning the next borehole
GZA Drilling Inc arrived back on-site on September 15 1987 to begin drilling in the former hazardous waste disposal area Drilling on borehole location WE87-1A commenced on September 15 and was terminated at a depth of 3 3 feet (+) on October 18 The borehole was terminated due to the subsurface conditions which were different from those anticipated in the closure area
On September 18 19 87 Mr Summerly and Mr Doorley located the center of the closure area based upon a plan titled Hazardous Waste Area Closing by C E Maquire dated September 1981 This new location was designated WE87-1B and drilling at this location was begun on September 21 1987 Bedrock was encountered at 367 feet (+) and was drilled to a depth of 53 feet and then cored to a depth of 68 feet
Two observation wells were installed at this location between September 28 and 30 Well WE87-1B-B was installed to a depth of 67 feet and sealed in bedrock Well WE87-1B-A was installed to a depth of 368 feet in fill material The remainder of the borehole was then sealed using a bentonite grout
Borehole WE87-1C was performed approximately 20 feet to the southeast of location WE87-1B on September 30 1987 Soils at this location were sampled continuously down from the surface in an attempt to recover a sample of the PVC cap material A sample of this material was recovered from a depth of 77 feet (plusmn) Based upon a discussion between Mr Ken Wenger and Mr Hartley this borehole was terminated at a depth of 8 feet and sealed with bentonite grout on October 1 1987 GZA Drilling Inc left the site on October 1 1987 after steam cleaning all equipment
3) On September 22 1987 Mr Ralph L Gumpert an industrial hygienist with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) conducted an unannounced inspection of the CLF WE87-1 drilling activities The inspection resulted in verbal comments present by OSHA to GZAs field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZAs two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency communication devices
4) September 22 1987 meeting is held with Wehren Engineering GZA subcontractor responsible for preparation of the feasibility study to discuss the project and scope of work Wehren is currently preparing an FS work plan and is developing contract documents for GZAs review
5) Several problems associated with the drilling effort were encountered On September 23 1987 GZA spoke with Ken Wenger about these problems and to agree upon a solution
RIAL and GZA personnel had begun development of landfill well WE87-3 using a submissible air lift pump At the completion of this effort after removing at least the volume of water introduced to the well during packer testing it was realized the well had significantly shifted because of landfill operations conducted in the near vicinity of the well After repeated efforts over several days to remove the pump it was successfully removed from the well This experience made it obvious that the real potential exists for loosing this well because of significant well movement and potential breakage of the casing Accordingly GZA requested EPAs verbal comments andor approval of GZAs proposed sampling plan so that groundwater samples could be collected from all landfill wells as soon as possible to avoid the risk of eventual well loss EPA was informed that GZA and RIAL will proceed with well sampling the next week using the proposed plan unless we hear otherwise EPA was agreeable to this approach but suggested we contact CDM to determine status of their plan review On September 24 1987 GZA contacted CDM T Pederson was not in at that time On September 25 1987 CDM
returned phone call at which time it was noted that the sampling plan had not been review GZA presented their concerns over well shifting and potential problems CDM agreed and committed to present comments by the following week
The second drilling issue that emerged during this period involved drilling on the former hazardous waste disposal area (WE87-1) The location of this boring was selected based on recommendations made Jim Doorley (RISWMC) based his best recollection of the locations of the hazardous waste trenches relative to the capped area Observations made while drilling at the location resulted in the determination that the boring was most likely not within the capped portion of the waste cell At the same time RISWMC provided GZA with a copy of a closure plan prepared for the RISWMC by C E Maguire (copy enclosed)
Based on a map showing the location of the waste cell in that closure plan GZA relocated the WE87-1 boring to the approximate center of the apparent capped area This information was presented to EPA during our September 23 1987 phone conversation
6) On September 25 1987 GZA spoke with John Zannos (EPA) regarding EPAs position concerning the use of drilling foam during the advancement of the multi-level wells The use of foam had been suggested by Guild Drilling Co to help remove rock fragments in the wells which result in lower drilling rates EPAs position with regard to the use of foam were (1) it could not be used (2) foaming agents often contain organic constituents and (3) can only be used if we risk loosing the hole and only after EPA approval GZA acknowledged position and transferred information to Guild Drilling
7) On September 30 1987 another drilling issue emerged with regard to drilling at the WE87-1 location Following the completion of drilling and installation of sampling wells at this location GZA moved the drill rig approximately 20 feet to the south of the WE87-1 boring in order to more accurately assess surface conditions within the capped area ie the presence of fly ash (Note this intensive sampling effort was beyond the agreed upon approach which involved sampling at 5-foot intervals until fly ash material was encountered for 10 feet) At a depth of approximately 77 feet the liner material was encountered This observation supports observed condition in WE87-1 suggesting that we have successfully installed a well within the capped region of site GZA does not suggest that it was determined that the well is placed within a former disposal trench since this was not the primary objective of this effort and not part of GZAs Scope of Work or Work Plan Recommendations were made to GZA by CDM to continue drilling at this location to bedrock The objective of this recommendation was not presented GZA did not agree with this approach since it essentially commits us to an additional week of drilling without a clear objective Accordingly the hole was terminated at approximately 77 feet
and grout filled This information and GZAs approach was presented to RISWMC and EPA Both parties agreed with our approach EPA committed that if warranted they may require GZA to return to this area to perform additional testing GZA acknowledged with the understanding that additional drilling activities are outside the present Scope of Work and therefore must result in contractual consent agreemervE) and schedule modifications TTT bullmdash
8) GZA reviewed RIDOH residential well sampling data this reporting period and began incorporation of this data along with the EPACDM residential well results onto a survey map which indicates location of sampling points well status (activeinactive) and the current or planned status of the Johnston water supply lines Of cruciai significance in this effort is the fact that the RIDOH sampling location are relative only ie street name without address number This hampers GZAs efforts in accurately assessing potential seeks off-site impacts and therefore we seek EPAs assistance in obtaining more detailed information
9) On October 14 1987 GZA returned a call to John Zannos (EPA) at which time information relative to drilling status was presented John presented concerns over drilling efforts at the WE87-1 location based on CDMs comments Although the specifics were not known it was discussed that GZA may not have been proceeding with agreed upon approach GZA noted that they felt they had and sought to resolve any outstanding issues It was agreed to talk about perceived problems at the upcoming October 23 1987 meeting EPA also noted concern over size of borehole (multi-level wells) which may make them incompatible with Waterloo systems EPA suggested that EPA contact Weston Geophysical to perform caliper logging measurements prior to ordering Waterloo system GZA agreed
10) Air monitoring was initiated at the site also during this period The air sampling was conductance in accordance with GZA revised air monitoring plan and based on verbal comments presented to GZA from CDM The air monitoring effort involved the collection of air samples upwind and downwind of the WE87-1 drilling location during and subsequent to drilling In addition to the preliminary air monitoring effort which was designed to address logistical and analytical considerations four additional rounds have or will be completed at the site
GZX
PROBLEMS RESOLVED
1) GZA receives RIDOH residential well sampling data
GZX
V
DATE INSTALLED ^ ^ ^ f ^ ^ ^ T J ^ J PRmFCT z^^^ t^^ ^^ c y y y^7=s LOCATION
GZAENGIMFFR ^ f ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ gt ^ X ^ ^ mMTRATTnP
BORING Wo U7pound f t - tG FILE No C^QOHt- lR
y i ^ r c ^ y i
(S^ ZA 7 gt - y SZT^i^
WEATHER mKiniTinM ^ - y ^ cy ^ npii ^ FR y i ^ h u i y j ^ ^ ^ v T c K
REMARKS A U y 7 E l Q U R M pound y V 7 ^ A R ^ 7=-y0Z
A D e p ^ h -fc o p a - f
tn
o H 3 J 3 EvroAOT^
(SPOUT o UJ
oc
CO 03
CO
u o 211 gtshycc lt QepToATre
PPLLET 5 pound A L
CO
7 8 ^
Asyli
- T P P O r 6 U A f lt D P X P ^
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
bullPROTECTIVE CASING ^ - i
bull1-12 SCHO 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE SAND BflCKOLL
BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (QOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO S C M X
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ss DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT r 9 i H y
cOLOBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
cc
BORING Mn 7Z7poundf^7-77i FILE No r-laquo^gr^ DATE INSTALLED f ^ f - ^ ^ -30 - ^7
PROJECT Sf in ^^^^oA PXPS LOCATION L^^ J ylty ^ zeuro^
GZA EhiGlNFFR P^^y S i ^ ^ - ^ Z Y y CONTRACTOR G Z A lt^^^^-^^ 3^^ C
WEATHER rrgtMrgtiTinMlt C7ea r ^70 6 DRILLER A r 7 ^ c z r - ^ ^ ^ s lt7 ^
REMARKS yU7ZlBji^TpoundZyAdpoundAZP^ A Y j P =^^crAA P i c^Z^ S6ZZIZ^P Z^-PPz^
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
I bullPROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE
CO bullz o Q
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ AP j ^ y - ^ ^ ^ o PAlt5P J Plt07
D ^ P A t L S CO bull r iNC to COAnOC G A N D BACKnLL CO My CO
u o gtshyQ BP^PaTTPPP BOREHOLE lt PP L(PP
ID CO HHlt
i2^ bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
1-12 SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
686 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
696^m bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING Aij 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 67 Z z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
WELL N a r y i f ^ - ^ 4 BORING Wo 7J7E2 FILE No C - 3 0 0 Z t t ^ DATE raquoMlaquoTAiiFn ^ - r - ^ - f 6 - P 7
PROJECT C g n f r d I k lt ^ r d - f t l f ^ p S LOCATION
GZA ENGINEER ^ ^ y G u m z n e l y y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A O ^ i i i i n Q XL DS^ WEATHER CONDITIONS C g ^ ^ ^ 8 o S HRII FR X gt ^ tn J ^ P e i r r y REMARKS ALL AAf^ASURrvXeAZPS Ay(P POM P O P O P ( P U A P O y^J7PB
bullGROUND SURFACE
Dejcih -i-o op o f CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL
P V C - O J e A - y i o s h (TYPICALLY 05 THICK)
U^ell Q^posh PROTECrriVE CASING ^ TVPP ^ I T E E L S X H S 6 g ^ f o y i ^ 4rr ^ y ^ r e
p y CO
S e a cuf y4gt 7ltir t7
E 1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
6 y t f ^ ^ a ^00 ^ o UJ y^O 3 47^i7S a bull if 7^ ir o lt SSA7ro 7srz^
CO CpoundMe^ZT bull glMS tQ COARSE SAND BACKF1UU CQ
GlRouT
Q a p p iTo)( traquo^4 y r 7 y
bullBOREHOLE P 6 7
QpoundArrozrr^ Z3 7gt^LL e r CO II
67 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I-12SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (001 SLDTS)
77 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCMX
jpMym
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING J ^ A P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT _ ^ i Z l
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
i^Z^ WELL N a ^ ^ ^ r V ^ BORING Ho AlpoundAl lA-FILE No C-^ltgt(^7-7^ DATE INSTALLED 8 S 8 7 - ^ lt S - 8 7
PROJECT Cezii^c^ l L ^ ^ o 7 A 7 P P ^ S LOCATION John^-f^on 1 PXshyGZA FNfiiMFFR Po S o t raquo ^ e r y C0NTR5CT0R GZA 0^77^^ nc WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl^lt^Y^ S ^ DRILLER - Pe i - f ^y shyZ^yai^CREMARKS bull
QO DEPTH C GROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
-PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE j
CO
o Q
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE oo LJ I a- 7 t 5 e e P a ^ e I cr CO P o r bull FINE lto COARSE SAND aOiCKFILL CQ O e a i l s ID CO 7 u P J i - r e f i o gtshy
-BOREHOLE cc lt Pop OP ROCK 7^2 s
6 PAL CO 76 Z
782 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 9 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
33J BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN S i l jReyroAjrpound pet-ter- SpoundAL ^ 2ycr2e^c^__yoz_7i
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING T P A P L
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 8 2 y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
Thgr ltp7 ^
bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3
FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7
PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP
GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^
WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P
GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs
UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H
2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y
r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7
Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ
t tr ^ A bull T X V pound
yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO
980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE
lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L
CO 3
m^ j m j
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B
BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7
PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT
K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc
WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE
CO
O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I
L3
LU f o r O e - h a i l s O
if CC
YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt
dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer
CO SfAplusmn37o
J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN
3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z
S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7
PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X
GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co
WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY
o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06
PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P
CO z o p yio
H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3
111
t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt
S ^ A L 3 CO yo
230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)
OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0
GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7
PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R
GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)
l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo
TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s
Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO
O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito
H Q
rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ ^^7ropxpP
p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt
s CO 67
M TOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
lt
CO z o p 3
i j j
a r) CO CQ Z) CO
gtbull a lt 2
CO
DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V
PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp
WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^
REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA
lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^
p p e - 72^
SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L
786
206
BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^
TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn
Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri
T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^
CGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL
-BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC
7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2
DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX
GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7
p d P OP Floe^
CO
O Ishy5 2 0 shy
bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
CJ
UJ
t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T
5poundAt^ 29 q
3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC
WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ
DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c
60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^
REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound
g o DEPTH
ELEVATION
_ pound GROUND SURFICE
I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC
CONCRETE(TYPICALLY
SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)
73PPFOAXrp SEAL
SloL 70
bull bull bull
I bullPROTE
TYPE
ECTIVE CASING bdquo
CO
o
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
C_)
LJ
t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
t l 2S2 O
gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302
322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2
P-^^ nP I ^
WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^
DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72
PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J
GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o
WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
o - t P V C i r o m
f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE Sree^L y x
V
CO
o 70
1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL
bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO
u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO
100
Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
NOTE NOT TO SCALt
vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC
y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19
Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i
ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^
Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O
SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L
CO
o
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
u UJ
t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r
S P A L
CO 3
3 ^
361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)
s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P
S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Jvj-iw-fili
IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A
EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N
^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull
^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^
CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA
Prepared for the
RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
OCTOBER 1981
CE MAGUIRE INC
PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND
Architects bull Engineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI
October 5 1981 CEM 3869
Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903
Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill
Dear Mr Delfino
In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area
The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects
Very truly yours
CE MAGUIRE INC
Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager
Enclosure
CMPdw
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK
3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX
TABLE NO TITLE
HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
FIGURE NO TITLE
1 LOCATION MAP
2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
FINAL GRADING PLAN
PAGE
1
5
9
PAGE
6
8
PAGE
2
11
DRAWING NO
1
2
3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
ANTICIPATED PROBLEMSUNRESOLVED ISSUES
1) GZA awaits EPA formal comments on air monitoring plan
2)
3)
GZA awaits EPA formal comments on sampling plan
GZA awaits schedule and scope of work for USGSgeophysical effort
down-hole
4) GZA awaits FS work plan from Wehren Engineering
UPCOMING EVENTSACTIVITIES PLANNED
EVENTACTIVITY
1) WE 87 ML-4 Boring
2) WE 87 ML-3 Boring
3) WE 87-13 Boring
4) Test Pit Explorations
5) VSP Work
6) Multilevel Sampler Installation
7) Surface WaterSediment Sampling
8) Groundwater Sampling
ANTICIPATED START DATE (WEEK OF)
October 18
November 1
November 1 (Dependent on Availability of Drill Rig)
November 8
November 15
November 22
November 22
November 22
GZX
PROGRESS MADE THIS REPORTING PERIOD
1) Meeting is held on September 10 1987 at the Central Landfill to discuss and field reconnaissance the locations of the five multi-level wells Present at the meeting were Ken Wenger and John Zannos (EPA) David Dorocz (RISWMC) Mark Brickie (CDM) John Hartley and Edward Summerly (GZA) the original intent of the meeting was to field locate the multi-level wells based on local topographical features ie outcrops distinct topographical depression etc At the completion of the effort it was recognized that such features are not readily apparent at the site Accordingly a mutual agreement was reached to locate the wells based on URI geophysicalfracture trace work and to proceed with this approach until URI could be contacted to address rationale for their selection of well locations (Note since that time numerous calls made by EPA and GZA to reach Dr Frolich have been unsuccessful)
2) Well installation completed during this drilling period is as follows
Guild commenced drilling at borehole location WE87-ML2 on September 14 1987 using the air percussion method Bedrock was encountered at 15 feet(+) and was drilled to a depth of 155 feet The borehole was then pressure tested and developed between September 28 and October 1 All equipment was then steam cleaned on October 2 1987 Guild commenced drilling borehole WE87-ML1 on October 5 using the air percussion method Bedrock was encountered at 21 feet ( + ) and was drilled to a depth of 210 feet The borehole was then pressure tested on October 14 and 15 AH equipment was then steam cleaned and moved to borehole location WE87-ML5 on October 15
Guild Drilling Co commenced drilling at borehole location WE87-4 on August 17 1987 Bedrock was encountered at 15 feet ( + ) and was cored to a depth of 4 6 feet The borehole was pressure tested and one observation well was installed to a depth of 36 feet and sealed in rock on August 21 All equipment was then steam cleaned prior to beginning the next borehole
GZA Drilling Inc arrived back on-site on September 15 1987 to begin drilling in the former hazardous waste disposal area Drilling on borehole location WE87-1A commenced on September 15 and was terminated at a depth of 3 3 feet (+) on October 18 The borehole was terminated due to the subsurface conditions which were different from those anticipated in the closure area
On September 18 19 87 Mr Summerly and Mr Doorley located the center of the closure area based upon a plan titled Hazardous Waste Area Closing by C E Maquire dated September 1981 This new location was designated WE87-1B and drilling at this location was begun on September 21 1987 Bedrock was encountered at 367 feet (+) and was drilled to a depth of 53 feet and then cored to a depth of 68 feet
Two observation wells were installed at this location between September 28 and 30 Well WE87-1B-B was installed to a depth of 67 feet and sealed in bedrock Well WE87-1B-A was installed to a depth of 368 feet in fill material The remainder of the borehole was then sealed using a bentonite grout
Borehole WE87-1C was performed approximately 20 feet to the southeast of location WE87-1B on September 30 1987 Soils at this location were sampled continuously down from the surface in an attempt to recover a sample of the PVC cap material A sample of this material was recovered from a depth of 77 feet (plusmn) Based upon a discussion between Mr Ken Wenger and Mr Hartley this borehole was terminated at a depth of 8 feet and sealed with bentonite grout on October 1 1987 GZA Drilling Inc left the site on October 1 1987 after steam cleaning all equipment
3) On September 22 1987 Mr Ralph L Gumpert an industrial hygienist with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) conducted an unannounced inspection of the CLF WE87-1 drilling activities The inspection resulted in verbal comments present by OSHA to GZAs field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZAs two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency communication devices
4) September 22 1987 meeting is held with Wehren Engineering GZA subcontractor responsible for preparation of the feasibility study to discuss the project and scope of work Wehren is currently preparing an FS work plan and is developing contract documents for GZAs review
5) Several problems associated with the drilling effort were encountered On September 23 1987 GZA spoke with Ken Wenger about these problems and to agree upon a solution
RIAL and GZA personnel had begun development of landfill well WE87-3 using a submissible air lift pump At the completion of this effort after removing at least the volume of water introduced to the well during packer testing it was realized the well had significantly shifted because of landfill operations conducted in the near vicinity of the well After repeated efforts over several days to remove the pump it was successfully removed from the well This experience made it obvious that the real potential exists for loosing this well because of significant well movement and potential breakage of the casing Accordingly GZA requested EPAs verbal comments andor approval of GZAs proposed sampling plan so that groundwater samples could be collected from all landfill wells as soon as possible to avoid the risk of eventual well loss EPA was informed that GZA and RIAL will proceed with well sampling the next week using the proposed plan unless we hear otherwise EPA was agreeable to this approach but suggested we contact CDM to determine status of their plan review On September 24 1987 GZA contacted CDM T Pederson was not in at that time On September 25 1987 CDM
returned phone call at which time it was noted that the sampling plan had not been review GZA presented their concerns over well shifting and potential problems CDM agreed and committed to present comments by the following week
The second drilling issue that emerged during this period involved drilling on the former hazardous waste disposal area (WE87-1) The location of this boring was selected based on recommendations made Jim Doorley (RISWMC) based his best recollection of the locations of the hazardous waste trenches relative to the capped area Observations made while drilling at the location resulted in the determination that the boring was most likely not within the capped portion of the waste cell At the same time RISWMC provided GZA with a copy of a closure plan prepared for the RISWMC by C E Maguire (copy enclosed)
Based on a map showing the location of the waste cell in that closure plan GZA relocated the WE87-1 boring to the approximate center of the apparent capped area This information was presented to EPA during our September 23 1987 phone conversation
6) On September 25 1987 GZA spoke with John Zannos (EPA) regarding EPAs position concerning the use of drilling foam during the advancement of the multi-level wells The use of foam had been suggested by Guild Drilling Co to help remove rock fragments in the wells which result in lower drilling rates EPAs position with regard to the use of foam were (1) it could not be used (2) foaming agents often contain organic constituents and (3) can only be used if we risk loosing the hole and only after EPA approval GZA acknowledged position and transferred information to Guild Drilling
7) On September 30 1987 another drilling issue emerged with regard to drilling at the WE87-1 location Following the completion of drilling and installation of sampling wells at this location GZA moved the drill rig approximately 20 feet to the south of the WE87-1 boring in order to more accurately assess surface conditions within the capped area ie the presence of fly ash (Note this intensive sampling effort was beyond the agreed upon approach which involved sampling at 5-foot intervals until fly ash material was encountered for 10 feet) At a depth of approximately 77 feet the liner material was encountered This observation supports observed condition in WE87-1 suggesting that we have successfully installed a well within the capped region of site GZA does not suggest that it was determined that the well is placed within a former disposal trench since this was not the primary objective of this effort and not part of GZAs Scope of Work or Work Plan Recommendations were made to GZA by CDM to continue drilling at this location to bedrock The objective of this recommendation was not presented GZA did not agree with this approach since it essentially commits us to an additional week of drilling without a clear objective Accordingly the hole was terminated at approximately 77 feet
and grout filled This information and GZAs approach was presented to RISWMC and EPA Both parties agreed with our approach EPA committed that if warranted they may require GZA to return to this area to perform additional testing GZA acknowledged with the understanding that additional drilling activities are outside the present Scope of Work and therefore must result in contractual consent agreemervE) and schedule modifications TTT bullmdash
8) GZA reviewed RIDOH residential well sampling data this reporting period and began incorporation of this data along with the EPACDM residential well results onto a survey map which indicates location of sampling points well status (activeinactive) and the current or planned status of the Johnston water supply lines Of cruciai significance in this effort is the fact that the RIDOH sampling location are relative only ie street name without address number This hampers GZAs efforts in accurately assessing potential seeks off-site impacts and therefore we seek EPAs assistance in obtaining more detailed information
9) On October 14 1987 GZA returned a call to John Zannos (EPA) at which time information relative to drilling status was presented John presented concerns over drilling efforts at the WE87-1 location based on CDMs comments Although the specifics were not known it was discussed that GZA may not have been proceeding with agreed upon approach GZA noted that they felt they had and sought to resolve any outstanding issues It was agreed to talk about perceived problems at the upcoming October 23 1987 meeting EPA also noted concern over size of borehole (multi-level wells) which may make them incompatible with Waterloo systems EPA suggested that EPA contact Weston Geophysical to perform caliper logging measurements prior to ordering Waterloo system GZA agreed
10) Air monitoring was initiated at the site also during this period The air sampling was conductance in accordance with GZA revised air monitoring plan and based on verbal comments presented to GZA from CDM The air monitoring effort involved the collection of air samples upwind and downwind of the WE87-1 drilling location during and subsequent to drilling In addition to the preliminary air monitoring effort which was designed to address logistical and analytical considerations four additional rounds have or will be completed at the site
GZX
PROBLEMS RESOLVED
1) GZA receives RIDOH residential well sampling data
GZX
V
DATE INSTALLED ^ ^ ^ f ^ ^ ^ T J ^ J PRmFCT z^^^ t^^ ^^ c y y y^7=s LOCATION
GZAENGIMFFR ^ f ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ gt ^ X ^ ^ mMTRATTnP
BORING Wo U7pound f t - tG FILE No C^QOHt- lR
y i ^ r c ^ y i
(S^ ZA 7 gt - y SZT^i^
WEATHER mKiniTinM ^ - y ^ cy ^ npii ^ FR y i ^ h u i y j ^ ^ ^ v T c K
REMARKS A U y 7 E l Q U R M pound y V 7 ^ A R ^ 7=-y0Z
A D e p ^ h -fc o p a - f
tn
o H 3 J 3 EvroAOT^
(SPOUT o UJ
oc
CO 03
CO
u o 211 gtshycc lt QepToATre
PPLLET 5 pound A L
CO
7 8 ^
Asyli
- T P P O r 6 U A f lt D P X P ^
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
bullPROTECTIVE CASING ^ - i
bull1-12 SCHO 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE SAND BflCKOLL
BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (QOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO S C M X
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ss DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT r 9 i H y
cOLOBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
cc
BORING Mn 7Z7poundf^7-77i FILE No r-laquo^gr^ DATE INSTALLED f ^ f - ^ ^ -30 - ^7
PROJECT Sf in ^^^^oA PXPS LOCATION L^^ J ylty ^ zeuro^
GZA EhiGlNFFR P^^y S i ^ ^ - ^ Z Y y CONTRACTOR G Z A lt^^^^-^^ 3^^ C
WEATHER rrgtMrgtiTinMlt C7ea r ^70 6 DRILLER A r 7 ^ c z r - ^ ^ ^ s lt7 ^
REMARKS yU7ZlBji^TpoundZyAdpoundAZP^ A Y j P =^^crAA P i c^Z^ S6ZZIZ^P Z^-PPz^
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
I bullPROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE
CO bullz o Q
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ AP j ^ y - ^ ^ ^ o PAlt5P J Plt07
D ^ P A t L S CO bull r iNC to COAnOC G A N D BACKnLL CO My CO
u o gtshyQ BP^PaTTPPP BOREHOLE lt PP L(PP
ID CO HHlt
i2^ bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
1-12 SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
686 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
696^m bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING Aij 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 67 Z z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
WELL N a r y i f ^ - ^ 4 BORING Wo 7J7E2 FILE No C - 3 0 0 Z t t ^ DATE raquoMlaquoTAiiFn ^ - r - ^ - f 6 - P 7
PROJECT C g n f r d I k lt ^ r d - f t l f ^ p S LOCATION
GZA ENGINEER ^ ^ y G u m z n e l y y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A O ^ i i i i n Q XL DS^ WEATHER CONDITIONS C g ^ ^ ^ 8 o S HRII FR X gt ^ tn J ^ P e i r r y REMARKS ALL AAf^ASURrvXeAZPS Ay(P POM P O P O P ( P U A P O y^J7PB
bullGROUND SURFACE
Dejcih -i-o op o f CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL
P V C - O J e A - y i o s h (TYPICALLY 05 THICK)
U^ell Q^posh PROTECrriVE CASING ^ TVPP ^ I T E E L S X H S 6 g ^ f o y i ^ 4rr ^ y ^ r e
p y CO
S e a cuf y4gt 7ltir t7
E 1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
6 y t f ^ ^ a ^00 ^ o UJ y^O 3 47^i7S a bull if 7^ ir o lt SSA7ro 7srz^
CO CpoundMe^ZT bull glMS tQ COARSE SAND BACKF1UU CQ
GlRouT
Q a p p iTo)( traquo^4 y r 7 y
bullBOREHOLE P 6 7
QpoundArrozrr^ Z3 7gt^LL e r CO II
67 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I-12SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (001 SLDTS)
77 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCMX
jpMym
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING J ^ A P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT _ ^ i Z l
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
i^Z^ WELL N a ^ ^ ^ r V ^ BORING Ho AlpoundAl lA-FILE No C-^ltgt(^7-7^ DATE INSTALLED 8 S 8 7 - ^ lt S - 8 7
PROJECT Cezii^c^ l L ^ ^ o 7 A 7 P P ^ S LOCATION John^-f^on 1 PXshyGZA FNfiiMFFR Po S o t raquo ^ e r y C0NTR5CT0R GZA 0^77^^ nc WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl^lt^Y^ S ^ DRILLER - Pe i - f ^y shyZ^yai^CREMARKS bull
QO DEPTH C GROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
-PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE j
CO
o Q
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE oo LJ I a- 7 t 5 e e P a ^ e I cr CO P o r bull FINE lto COARSE SAND aOiCKFILL CQ O e a i l s ID CO 7 u P J i - r e f i o gtshy
-BOREHOLE cc lt Pop OP ROCK 7^2 s
6 PAL CO 76 Z
782 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 9 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
33J BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN S i l jReyroAjrpound pet-ter- SpoundAL ^ 2ycr2e^c^__yoz_7i
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING T P A P L
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 8 2 y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
Thgr ltp7 ^
bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3
FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7
PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP
GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^
WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P
GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs
UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H
2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y
r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7
Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ
t tr ^ A bull T X V pound
yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO
980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE
lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L
CO 3
m^ j m j
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B
BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7
PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT
K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc
WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE
CO
O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I
L3
LU f o r O e - h a i l s O
if CC
YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt
dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer
CO SfAplusmn37o
J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN
3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z
S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7
PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X
GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co
WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY
o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06
PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P
CO z o p yio
H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3
111
t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt
S ^ A L 3 CO yo
230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)
OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0
GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7
PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R
GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)
l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo
TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s
Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO
O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito
H Q
rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ ^^7ropxpP
p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt
s CO 67
M TOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
lt
CO z o p 3
i j j
a r) CO CQ Z) CO
gtbull a lt 2
CO
DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V
PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp
WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^
REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA
lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^
p p e - 72^
SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L
786
206
BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^
TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn
Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri
T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^
CGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL
-BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC
7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2
DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX
GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7
p d P OP Floe^
CO
O Ishy5 2 0 shy
bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
CJ
UJ
t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T
5poundAt^ 29 q
3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC
WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ
DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c
60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^
REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound
g o DEPTH
ELEVATION
_ pound GROUND SURFICE
I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC
CONCRETE(TYPICALLY
SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)
73PPFOAXrp SEAL
SloL 70
bull bull bull
I bullPROTE
TYPE
ECTIVE CASING bdquo
CO
o
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
C_)
LJ
t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
t l 2S2 O
gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302
322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2
P-^^ nP I ^
WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^
DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72
PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J
GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o
WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
o - t P V C i r o m
f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE Sree^L y x
V
CO
o 70
1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL
bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO
u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO
100
Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
NOTE NOT TO SCALt
vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC
y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19
Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i
ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^
Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O
SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L
CO
o
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
u UJ
t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r
S P A L
CO 3
3 ^
361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)
s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P
S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Jvj-iw-fili
IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A
EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N
^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull
^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^
CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA
Prepared for the
RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
OCTOBER 1981
CE MAGUIRE INC
PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND
Architects bull Engineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI
October 5 1981 CEM 3869
Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903
Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill
Dear Mr Delfino
In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area
The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects
Very truly yours
CE MAGUIRE INC
Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager
Enclosure
CMPdw
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK
3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX
TABLE NO TITLE
HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
FIGURE NO TITLE
1 LOCATION MAP
2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
FINAL GRADING PLAN
PAGE
1
5
9
PAGE
6
8
PAGE
2
11
DRAWING NO
1
2
3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
UPCOMING EVENTSACTIVITIES PLANNED
EVENTACTIVITY
1) WE 87 ML-4 Boring
2) WE 87 ML-3 Boring
3) WE 87-13 Boring
4) Test Pit Explorations
5) VSP Work
6) Multilevel Sampler Installation
7) Surface WaterSediment Sampling
8) Groundwater Sampling
ANTICIPATED START DATE (WEEK OF)
October 18
November 1
November 1 (Dependent on Availability of Drill Rig)
November 8
November 15
November 22
November 22
November 22
GZX
PROGRESS MADE THIS REPORTING PERIOD
1) Meeting is held on September 10 1987 at the Central Landfill to discuss and field reconnaissance the locations of the five multi-level wells Present at the meeting were Ken Wenger and John Zannos (EPA) David Dorocz (RISWMC) Mark Brickie (CDM) John Hartley and Edward Summerly (GZA) the original intent of the meeting was to field locate the multi-level wells based on local topographical features ie outcrops distinct topographical depression etc At the completion of the effort it was recognized that such features are not readily apparent at the site Accordingly a mutual agreement was reached to locate the wells based on URI geophysicalfracture trace work and to proceed with this approach until URI could be contacted to address rationale for their selection of well locations (Note since that time numerous calls made by EPA and GZA to reach Dr Frolich have been unsuccessful)
2) Well installation completed during this drilling period is as follows
Guild commenced drilling at borehole location WE87-ML2 on September 14 1987 using the air percussion method Bedrock was encountered at 15 feet(+) and was drilled to a depth of 155 feet The borehole was then pressure tested and developed between September 28 and October 1 All equipment was then steam cleaned on October 2 1987 Guild commenced drilling borehole WE87-ML1 on October 5 using the air percussion method Bedrock was encountered at 21 feet ( + ) and was drilled to a depth of 210 feet The borehole was then pressure tested on October 14 and 15 AH equipment was then steam cleaned and moved to borehole location WE87-ML5 on October 15
Guild Drilling Co commenced drilling at borehole location WE87-4 on August 17 1987 Bedrock was encountered at 15 feet ( + ) and was cored to a depth of 4 6 feet The borehole was pressure tested and one observation well was installed to a depth of 36 feet and sealed in rock on August 21 All equipment was then steam cleaned prior to beginning the next borehole
GZA Drilling Inc arrived back on-site on September 15 1987 to begin drilling in the former hazardous waste disposal area Drilling on borehole location WE87-1A commenced on September 15 and was terminated at a depth of 3 3 feet (+) on October 18 The borehole was terminated due to the subsurface conditions which were different from those anticipated in the closure area
On September 18 19 87 Mr Summerly and Mr Doorley located the center of the closure area based upon a plan titled Hazardous Waste Area Closing by C E Maquire dated September 1981 This new location was designated WE87-1B and drilling at this location was begun on September 21 1987 Bedrock was encountered at 367 feet (+) and was drilled to a depth of 53 feet and then cored to a depth of 68 feet
Two observation wells were installed at this location between September 28 and 30 Well WE87-1B-B was installed to a depth of 67 feet and sealed in bedrock Well WE87-1B-A was installed to a depth of 368 feet in fill material The remainder of the borehole was then sealed using a bentonite grout
Borehole WE87-1C was performed approximately 20 feet to the southeast of location WE87-1B on September 30 1987 Soils at this location were sampled continuously down from the surface in an attempt to recover a sample of the PVC cap material A sample of this material was recovered from a depth of 77 feet (plusmn) Based upon a discussion between Mr Ken Wenger and Mr Hartley this borehole was terminated at a depth of 8 feet and sealed with bentonite grout on October 1 1987 GZA Drilling Inc left the site on October 1 1987 after steam cleaning all equipment
3) On September 22 1987 Mr Ralph L Gumpert an industrial hygienist with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) conducted an unannounced inspection of the CLF WE87-1 drilling activities The inspection resulted in verbal comments present by OSHA to GZAs field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZAs two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency communication devices
4) September 22 1987 meeting is held with Wehren Engineering GZA subcontractor responsible for preparation of the feasibility study to discuss the project and scope of work Wehren is currently preparing an FS work plan and is developing contract documents for GZAs review
5) Several problems associated with the drilling effort were encountered On September 23 1987 GZA spoke with Ken Wenger about these problems and to agree upon a solution
RIAL and GZA personnel had begun development of landfill well WE87-3 using a submissible air lift pump At the completion of this effort after removing at least the volume of water introduced to the well during packer testing it was realized the well had significantly shifted because of landfill operations conducted in the near vicinity of the well After repeated efforts over several days to remove the pump it was successfully removed from the well This experience made it obvious that the real potential exists for loosing this well because of significant well movement and potential breakage of the casing Accordingly GZA requested EPAs verbal comments andor approval of GZAs proposed sampling plan so that groundwater samples could be collected from all landfill wells as soon as possible to avoid the risk of eventual well loss EPA was informed that GZA and RIAL will proceed with well sampling the next week using the proposed plan unless we hear otherwise EPA was agreeable to this approach but suggested we contact CDM to determine status of their plan review On September 24 1987 GZA contacted CDM T Pederson was not in at that time On September 25 1987 CDM
returned phone call at which time it was noted that the sampling plan had not been review GZA presented their concerns over well shifting and potential problems CDM agreed and committed to present comments by the following week
The second drilling issue that emerged during this period involved drilling on the former hazardous waste disposal area (WE87-1) The location of this boring was selected based on recommendations made Jim Doorley (RISWMC) based his best recollection of the locations of the hazardous waste trenches relative to the capped area Observations made while drilling at the location resulted in the determination that the boring was most likely not within the capped portion of the waste cell At the same time RISWMC provided GZA with a copy of a closure plan prepared for the RISWMC by C E Maguire (copy enclosed)
Based on a map showing the location of the waste cell in that closure plan GZA relocated the WE87-1 boring to the approximate center of the apparent capped area This information was presented to EPA during our September 23 1987 phone conversation
6) On September 25 1987 GZA spoke with John Zannos (EPA) regarding EPAs position concerning the use of drilling foam during the advancement of the multi-level wells The use of foam had been suggested by Guild Drilling Co to help remove rock fragments in the wells which result in lower drilling rates EPAs position with regard to the use of foam were (1) it could not be used (2) foaming agents often contain organic constituents and (3) can only be used if we risk loosing the hole and only after EPA approval GZA acknowledged position and transferred information to Guild Drilling
7) On September 30 1987 another drilling issue emerged with regard to drilling at the WE87-1 location Following the completion of drilling and installation of sampling wells at this location GZA moved the drill rig approximately 20 feet to the south of the WE87-1 boring in order to more accurately assess surface conditions within the capped area ie the presence of fly ash (Note this intensive sampling effort was beyond the agreed upon approach which involved sampling at 5-foot intervals until fly ash material was encountered for 10 feet) At a depth of approximately 77 feet the liner material was encountered This observation supports observed condition in WE87-1 suggesting that we have successfully installed a well within the capped region of site GZA does not suggest that it was determined that the well is placed within a former disposal trench since this was not the primary objective of this effort and not part of GZAs Scope of Work or Work Plan Recommendations were made to GZA by CDM to continue drilling at this location to bedrock The objective of this recommendation was not presented GZA did not agree with this approach since it essentially commits us to an additional week of drilling without a clear objective Accordingly the hole was terminated at approximately 77 feet
and grout filled This information and GZAs approach was presented to RISWMC and EPA Both parties agreed with our approach EPA committed that if warranted they may require GZA to return to this area to perform additional testing GZA acknowledged with the understanding that additional drilling activities are outside the present Scope of Work and therefore must result in contractual consent agreemervE) and schedule modifications TTT bullmdash
8) GZA reviewed RIDOH residential well sampling data this reporting period and began incorporation of this data along with the EPACDM residential well results onto a survey map which indicates location of sampling points well status (activeinactive) and the current or planned status of the Johnston water supply lines Of cruciai significance in this effort is the fact that the RIDOH sampling location are relative only ie street name without address number This hampers GZAs efforts in accurately assessing potential seeks off-site impacts and therefore we seek EPAs assistance in obtaining more detailed information
9) On October 14 1987 GZA returned a call to John Zannos (EPA) at which time information relative to drilling status was presented John presented concerns over drilling efforts at the WE87-1 location based on CDMs comments Although the specifics were not known it was discussed that GZA may not have been proceeding with agreed upon approach GZA noted that they felt they had and sought to resolve any outstanding issues It was agreed to talk about perceived problems at the upcoming October 23 1987 meeting EPA also noted concern over size of borehole (multi-level wells) which may make them incompatible with Waterloo systems EPA suggested that EPA contact Weston Geophysical to perform caliper logging measurements prior to ordering Waterloo system GZA agreed
10) Air monitoring was initiated at the site also during this period The air sampling was conductance in accordance with GZA revised air monitoring plan and based on verbal comments presented to GZA from CDM The air monitoring effort involved the collection of air samples upwind and downwind of the WE87-1 drilling location during and subsequent to drilling In addition to the preliminary air monitoring effort which was designed to address logistical and analytical considerations four additional rounds have or will be completed at the site
GZX
PROBLEMS RESOLVED
1) GZA receives RIDOH residential well sampling data
GZX
V
DATE INSTALLED ^ ^ ^ f ^ ^ ^ T J ^ J PRmFCT z^^^ t^^ ^^ c y y y^7=s LOCATION
GZAENGIMFFR ^ f ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ gt ^ X ^ ^ mMTRATTnP
BORING Wo U7pound f t - tG FILE No C^QOHt- lR
y i ^ r c ^ y i
(S^ ZA 7 gt - y SZT^i^
WEATHER mKiniTinM ^ - y ^ cy ^ npii ^ FR y i ^ h u i y j ^ ^ ^ v T c K
REMARKS A U y 7 E l Q U R M pound y V 7 ^ A R ^ 7=-y0Z
A D e p ^ h -fc o p a - f
tn
o H 3 J 3 EvroAOT^
(SPOUT o UJ
oc
CO 03
CO
u o 211 gtshycc lt QepToATre
PPLLET 5 pound A L
CO
7 8 ^
Asyli
- T P P O r 6 U A f lt D P X P ^
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
bullPROTECTIVE CASING ^ - i
bull1-12 SCHO 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE SAND BflCKOLL
BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (QOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO S C M X
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ss DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT r 9 i H y
cOLOBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
cc
BORING Mn 7Z7poundf^7-77i FILE No r-laquo^gr^ DATE INSTALLED f ^ f - ^ ^ -30 - ^7
PROJECT Sf in ^^^^oA PXPS LOCATION L^^ J ylty ^ zeuro^
GZA EhiGlNFFR P^^y S i ^ ^ - ^ Z Y y CONTRACTOR G Z A lt^^^^-^^ 3^^ C
WEATHER rrgtMrgtiTinMlt C7ea r ^70 6 DRILLER A r 7 ^ c z r - ^ ^ ^ s lt7 ^
REMARKS yU7ZlBji^TpoundZyAdpoundAZP^ A Y j P =^^crAA P i c^Z^ S6ZZIZ^P Z^-PPz^
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
I bullPROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE
CO bullz o Q
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ AP j ^ y - ^ ^ ^ o PAlt5P J Plt07
D ^ P A t L S CO bull r iNC to COAnOC G A N D BACKnLL CO My CO
u o gtshyQ BP^PaTTPPP BOREHOLE lt PP L(PP
ID CO HHlt
i2^ bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
1-12 SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
686 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
696^m bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING Aij 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 67 Z z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
WELL N a r y i f ^ - ^ 4 BORING Wo 7J7E2 FILE No C - 3 0 0 Z t t ^ DATE raquoMlaquoTAiiFn ^ - r - ^ - f 6 - P 7
PROJECT C g n f r d I k lt ^ r d - f t l f ^ p S LOCATION
GZA ENGINEER ^ ^ y G u m z n e l y y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A O ^ i i i i n Q XL DS^ WEATHER CONDITIONS C g ^ ^ ^ 8 o S HRII FR X gt ^ tn J ^ P e i r r y REMARKS ALL AAf^ASURrvXeAZPS Ay(P POM P O P O P ( P U A P O y^J7PB
bullGROUND SURFACE
Dejcih -i-o op o f CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL
P V C - O J e A - y i o s h (TYPICALLY 05 THICK)
U^ell Q^posh PROTECrriVE CASING ^ TVPP ^ I T E E L S X H S 6 g ^ f o y i ^ 4rr ^ y ^ r e
p y CO
S e a cuf y4gt 7ltir t7
E 1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
6 y t f ^ ^ a ^00 ^ o UJ y^O 3 47^i7S a bull if 7^ ir o lt SSA7ro 7srz^
CO CpoundMe^ZT bull glMS tQ COARSE SAND BACKF1UU CQ
GlRouT
Q a p p iTo)( traquo^4 y r 7 y
bullBOREHOLE P 6 7
QpoundArrozrr^ Z3 7gt^LL e r CO II
67 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I-12SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (001 SLDTS)
77 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCMX
jpMym
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING J ^ A P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT _ ^ i Z l
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
i^Z^ WELL N a ^ ^ ^ r V ^ BORING Ho AlpoundAl lA-FILE No C-^ltgt(^7-7^ DATE INSTALLED 8 S 8 7 - ^ lt S - 8 7
PROJECT Cezii^c^ l L ^ ^ o 7 A 7 P P ^ S LOCATION John^-f^on 1 PXshyGZA FNfiiMFFR Po S o t raquo ^ e r y C0NTR5CT0R GZA 0^77^^ nc WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl^lt^Y^ S ^ DRILLER - Pe i - f ^y shyZ^yai^CREMARKS bull
QO DEPTH C GROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
-PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE j
CO
o Q
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE oo LJ I a- 7 t 5 e e P a ^ e I cr CO P o r bull FINE lto COARSE SAND aOiCKFILL CQ O e a i l s ID CO 7 u P J i - r e f i o gtshy
-BOREHOLE cc lt Pop OP ROCK 7^2 s
6 PAL CO 76 Z
782 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 9 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
33J BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN S i l jReyroAjrpound pet-ter- SpoundAL ^ 2ycr2e^c^__yoz_7i
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING T P A P L
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 8 2 y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
Thgr ltp7 ^
bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3
FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7
PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP
GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^
WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P
GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs
UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H
2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y
r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7
Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ
t tr ^ A bull T X V pound
yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO
980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE
lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L
CO 3
m^ j m j
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B
BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7
PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT
K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc
WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE
CO
O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I
L3
LU f o r O e - h a i l s O
if CC
YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt
dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer
CO SfAplusmn37o
J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN
3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z
S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7
PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X
GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co
WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY
o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06
PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P
CO z o p yio
H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3
111
t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt
S ^ A L 3 CO yo
230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)
OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0
GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7
PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R
GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)
l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo
TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s
Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO
O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito
H Q
rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ ^^7ropxpP
p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt
s CO 67
M TOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
lt
CO z o p 3
i j j
a r) CO CQ Z) CO
gtbull a lt 2
CO
DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V
PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp
WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^
REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA
lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^
p p e - 72^
SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L
786
206
BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^
TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn
Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri
T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^
CGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL
-BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC
7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2
DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX
GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7
p d P OP Floe^
CO
O Ishy5 2 0 shy
bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
CJ
UJ
t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T
5poundAt^ 29 q
3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC
WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ
DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c
60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^
REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound
g o DEPTH
ELEVATION
_ pound GROUND SURFICE
I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC
CONCRETE(TYPICALLY
SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)
73PPFOAXrp SEAL
SloL 70
bull bull bull
I bullPROTE
TYPE
ECTIVE CASING bdquo
CO
o
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
C_)
LJ
t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
t l 2S2 O
gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302
322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2
P-^^ nP I ^
WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^
DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72
PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J
GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o
WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
o - t P V C i r o m
f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE Sree^L y x
V
CO
o 70
1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL
bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO
u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO
100
Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
NOTE NOT TO SCALt
vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC
y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19
Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i
ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^
Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O
SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L
CO
o
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
u UJ
t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r
S P A L
CO 3
3 ^
361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)
s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P
S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Jvj-iw-fili
IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A
EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N
^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull
^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^
CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA
Prepared for the
RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
OCTOBER 1981
CE MAGUIRE INC
PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND
Architects bull Engineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI
October 5 1981 CEM 3869
Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903
Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill
Dear Mr Delfino
In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area
The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects
Very truly yours
CE MAGUIRE INC
Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager
Enclosure
CMPdw
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK
3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX
TABLE NO TITLE
HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
FIGURE NO TITLE
1 LOCATION MAP
2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
FINAL GRADING PLAN
PAGE
1
5
9
PAGE
6
8
PAGE
2
11
DRAWING NO
1
2
3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
PROGRESS MADE THIS REPORTING PERIOD
1) Meeting is held on September 10 1987 at the Central Landfill to discuss and field reconnaissance the locations of the five multi-level wells Present at the meeting were Ken Wenger and John Zannos (EPA) David Dorocz (RISWMC) Mark Brickie (CDM) John Hartley and Edward Summerly (GZA) the original intent of the meeting was to field locate the multi-level wells based on local topographical features ie outcrops distinct topographical depression etc At the completion of the effort it was recognized that such features are not readily apparent at the site Accordingly a mutual agreement was reached to locate the wells based on URI geophysicalfracture trace work and to proceed with this approach until URI could be contacted to address rationale for their selection of well locations (Note since that time numerous calls made by EPA and GZA to reach Dr Frolich have been unsuccessful)
2) Well installation completed during this drilling period is as follows
Guild commenced drilling at borehole location WE87-ML2 on September 14 1987 using the air percussion method Bedrock was encountered at 15 feet(+) and was drilled to a depth of 155 feet The borehole was then pressure tested and developed between September 28 and October 1 All equipment was then steam cleaned on October 2 1987 Guild commenced drilling borehole WE87-ML1 on October 5 using the air percussion method Bedrock was encountered at 21 feet ( + ) and was drilled to a depth of 210 feet The borehole was then pressure tested on October 14 and 15 AH equipment was then steam cleaned and moved to borehole location WE87-ML5 on October 15
Guild Drilling Co commenced drilling at borehole location WE87-4 on August 17 1987 Bedrock was encountered at 15 feet ( + ) and was cored to a depth of 4 6 feet The borehole was pressure tested and one observation well was installed to a depth of 36 feet and sealed in rock on August 21 All equipment was then steam cleaned prior to beginning the next borehole
GZA Drilling Inc arrived back on-site on September 15 1987 to begin drilling in the former hazardous waste disposal area Drilling on borehole location WE87-1A commenced on September 15 and was terminated at a depth of 3 3 feet (+) on October 18 The borehole was terminated due to the subsurface conditions which were different from those anticipated in the closure area
On September 18 19 87 Mr Summerly and Mr Doorley located the center of the closure area based upon a plan titled Hazardous Waste Area Closing by C E Maquire dated September 1981 This new location was designated WE87-1B and drilling at this location was begun on September 21 1987 Bedrock was encountered at 367 feet (+) and was drilled to a depth of 53 feet and then cored to a depth of 68 feet
Two observation wells were installed at this location between September 28 and 30 Well WE87-1B-B was installed to a depth of 67 feet and sealed in bedrock Well WE87-1B-A was installed to a depth of 368 feet in fill material The remainder of the borehole was then sealed using a bentonite grout
Borehole WE87-1C was performed approximately 20 feet to the southeast of location WE87-1B on September 30 1987 Soils at this location were sampled continuously down from the surface in an attempt to recover a sample of the PVC cap material A sample of this material was recovered from a depth of 77 feet (plusmn) Based upon a discussion between Mr Ken Wenger and Mr Hartley this borehole was terminated at a depth of 8 feet and sealed with bentonite grout on October 1 1987 GZA Drilling Inc left the site on October 1 1987 after steam cleaning all equipment
3) On September 22 1987 Mr Ralph L Gumpert an industrial hygienist with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) conducted an unannounced inspection of the CLF WE87-1 drilling activities The inspection resulted in verbal comments present by OSHA to GZAs field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZAs two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency communication devices
4) September 22 1987 meeting is held with Wehren Engineering GZA subcontractor responsible for preparation of the feasibility study to discuss the project and scope of work Wehren is currently preparing an FS work plan and is developing contract documents for GZAs review
5) Several problems associated with the drilling effort were encountered On September 23 1987 GZA spoke with Ken Wenger about these problems and to agree upon a solution
RIAL and GZA personnel had begun development of landfill well WE87-3 using a submissible air lift pump At the completion of this effort after removing at least the volume of water introduced to the well during packer testing it was realized the well had significantly shifted because of landfill operations conducted in the near vicinity of the well After repeated efforts over several days to remove the pump it was successfully removed from the well This experience made it obvious that the real potential exists for loosing this well because of significant well movement and potential breakage of the casing Accordingly GZA requested EPAs verbal comments andor approval of GZAs proposed sampling plan so that groundwater samples could be collected from all landfill wells as soon as possible to avoid the risk of eventual well loss EPA was informed that GZA and RIAL will proceed with well sampling the next week using the proposed plan unless we hear otherwise EPA was agreeable to this approach but suggested we contact CDM to determine status of their plan review On September 24 1987 GZA contacted CDM T Pederson was not in at that time On September 25 1987 CDM
returned phone call at which time it was noted that the sampling plan had not been review GZA presented their concerns over well shifting and potential problems CDM agreed and committed to present comments by the following week
The second drilling issue that emerged during this period involved drilling on the former hazardous waste disposal area (WE87-1) The location of this boring was selected based on recommendations made Jim Doorley (RISWMC) based his best recollection of the locations of the hazardous waste trenches relative to the capped area Observations made while drilling at the location resulted in the determination that the boring was most likely not within the capped portion of the waste cell At the same time RISWMC provided GZA with a copy of a closure plan prepared for the RISWMC by C E Maguire (copy enclosed)
Based on a map showing the location of the waste cell in that closure plan GZA relocated the WE87-1 boring to the approximate center of the apparent capped area This information was presented to EPA during our September 23 1987 phone conversation
6) On September 25 1987 GZA spoke with John Zannos (EPA) regarding EPAs position concerning the use of drilling foam during the advancement of the multi-level wells The use of foam had been suggested by Guild Drilling Co to help remove rock fragments in the wells which result in lower drilling rates EPAs position with regard to the use of foam were (1) it could not be used (2) foaming agents often contain organic constituents and (3) can only be used if we risk loosing the hole and only after EPA approval GZA acknowledged position and transferred information to Guild Drilling
7) On September 30 1987 another drilling issue emerged with regard to drilling at the WE87-1 location Following the completion of drilling and installation of sampling wells at this location GZA moved the drill rig approximately 20 feet to the south of the WE87-1 boring in order to more accurately assess surface conditions within the capped area ie the presence of fly ash (Note this intensive sampling effort was beyond the agreed upon approach which involved sampling at 5-foot intervals until fly ash material was encountered for 10 feet) At a depth of approximately 77 feet the liner material was encountered This observation supports observed condition in WE87-1 suggesting that we have successfully installed a well within the capped region of site GZA does not suggest that it was determined that the well is placed within a former disposal trench since this was not the primary objective of this effort and not part of GZAs Scope of Work or Work Plan Recommendations were made to GZA by CDM to continue drilling at this location to bedrock The objective of this recommendation was not presented GZA did not agree with this approach since it essentially commits us to an additional week of drilling without a clear objective Accordingly the hole was terminated at approximately 77 feet
and grout filled This information and GZAs approach was presented to RISWMC and EPA Both parties agreed with our approach EPA committed that if warranted they may require GZA to return to this area to perform additional testing GZA acknowledged with the understanding that additional drilling activities are outside the present Scope of Work and therefore must result in contractual consent agreemervE) and schedule modifications TTT bullmdash
8) GZA reviewed RIDOH residential well sampling data this reporting period and began incorporation of this data along with the EPACDM residential well results onto a survey map which indicates location of sampling points well status (activeinactive) and the current or planned status of the Johnston water supply lines Of cruciai significance in this effort is the fact that the RIDOH sampling location are relative only ie street name without address number This hampers GZAs efforts in accurately assessing potential seeks off-site impacts and therefore we seek EPAs assistance in obtaining more detailed information
9) On October 14 1987 GZA returned a call to John Zannos (EPA) at which time information relative to drilling status was presented John presented concerns over drilling efforts at the WE87-1 location based on CDMs comments Although the specifics were not known it was discussed that GZA may not have been proceeding with agreed upon approach GZA noted that they felt they had and sought to resolve any outstanding issues It was agreed to talk about perceived problems at the upcoming October 23 1987 meeting EPA also noted concern over size of borehole (multi-level wells) which may make them incompatible with Waterloo systems EPA suggested that EPA contact Weston Geophysical to perform caliper logging measurements prior to ordering Waterloo system GZA agreed
10) Air monitoring was initiated at the site also during this period The air sampling was conductance in accordance with GZA revised air monitoring plan and based on verbal comments presented to GZA from CDM The air monitoring effort involved the collection of air samples upwind and downwind of the WE87-1 drilling location during and subsequent to drilling In addition to the preliminary air monitoring effort which was designed to address logistical and analytical considerations four additional rounds have or will be completed at the site
GZX
PROBLEMS RESOLVED
1) GZA receives RIDOH residential well sampling data
GZX
V
DATE INSTALLED ^ ^ ^ f ^ ^ ^ T J ^ J PRmFCT z^^^ t^^ ^^ c y y y^7=s LOCATION
GZAENGIMFFR ^ f ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ gt ^ X ^ ^ mMTRATTnP
BORING Wo U7pound f t - tG FILE No C^QOHt- lR
y i ^ r c ^ y i
(S^ ZA 7 gt - y SZT^i^
WEATHER mKiniTinM ^ - y ^ cy ^ npii ^ FR y i ^ h u i y j ^ ^ ^ v T c K
REMARKS A U y 7 E l Q U R M pound y V 7 ^ A R ^ 7=-y0Z
A D e p ^ h -fc o p a - f
tn
o H 3 J 3 EvroAOT^
(SPOUT o UJ
oc
CO 03
CO
u o 211 gtshycc lt QepToATre
PPLLET 5 pound A L
CO
7 8 ^
Asyli
- T P P O r 6 U A f lt D P X P ^
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
bullPROTECTIVE CASING ^ - i
bull1-12 SCHO 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE SAND BflCKOLL
BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (QOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO S C M X
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ss DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT r 9 i H y
cOLOBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
cc
BORING Mn 7Z7poundf^7-77i FILE No r-laquo^gr^ DATE INSTALLED f ^ f - ^ ^ -30 - ^7
PROJECT Sf in ^^^^oA PXPS LOCATION L^^ J ylty ^ zeuro^
GZA EhiGlNFFR P^^y S i ^ ^ - ^ Z Y y CONTRACTOR G Z A lt^^^^-^^ 3^^ C
WEATHER rrgtMrgtiTinMlt C7ea r ^70 6 DRILLER A r 7 ^ c z r - ^ ^ ^ s lt7 ^
REMARKS yU7ZlBji^TpoundZyAdpoundAZP^ A Y j P =^^crAA P i c^Z^ S6ZZIZ^P Z^-PPz^
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
I bullPROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE
CO bullz o Q
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ AP j ^ y - ^ ^ ^ o PAlt5P J Plt07
D ^ P A t L S CO bull r iNC to COAnOC G A N D BACKnLL CO My CO
u o gtshyQ BP^PaTTPPP BOREHOLE lt PP L(PP
ID CO HHlt
i2^ bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
1-12 SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
686 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
696^m bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING Aij 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 67 Z z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
WELL N a r y i f ^ - ^ 4 BORING Wo 7J7E2 FILE No C - 3 0 0 Z t t ^ DATE raquoMlaquoTAiiFn ^ - r - ^ - f 6 - P 7
PROJECT C g n f r d I k lt ^ r d - f t l f ^ p S LOCATION
GZA ENGINEER ^ ^ y G u m z n e l y y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A O ^ i i i i n Q XL DS^ WEATHER CONDITIONS C g ^ ^ ^ 8 o S HRII FR X gt ^ tn J ^ P e i r r y REMARKS ALL AAf^ASURrvXeAZPS Ay(P POM P O P O P ( P U A P O y^J7PB
bullGROUND SURFACE
Dejcih -i-o op o f CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL
P V C - O J e A - y i o s h (TYPICALLY 05 THICK)
U^ell Q^posh PROTECrriVE CASING ^ TVPP ^ I T E E L S X H S 6 g ^ f o y i ^ 4rr ^ y ^ r e
p y CO
S e a cuf y4gt 7ltir t7
E 1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
6 y t f ^ ^ a ^00 ^ o UJ y^O 3 47^i7S a bull if 7^ ir o lt SSA7ro 7srz^
CO CpoundMe^ZT bull glMS tQ COARSE SAND BACKF1UU CQ
GlRouT
Q a p p iTo)( traquo^4 y r 7 y
bullBOREHOLE P 6 7
QpoundArrozrr^ Z3 7gt^LL e r CO II
67 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I-12SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (001 SLDTS)
77 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCMX
jpMym
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING J ^ A P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT _ ^ i Z l
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
i^Z^ WELL N a ^ ^ ^ r V ^ BORING Ho AlpoundAl lA-FILE No C-^ltgt(^7-7^ DATE INSTALLED 8 S 8 7 - ^ lt S - 8 7
PROJECT Cezii^c^ l L ^ ^ o 7 A 7 P P ^ S LOCATION John^-f^on 1 PXshyGZA FNfiiMFFR Po S o t raquo ^ e r y C0NTR5CT0R GZA 0^77^^ nc WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl^lt^Y^ S ^ DRILLER - Pe i - f ^y shyZ^yai^CREMARKS bull
QO DEPTH C GROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
-PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE j
CO
o Q
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE oo LJ I a- 7 t 5 e e P a ^ e I cr CO P o r bull FINE lto COARSE SAND aOiCKFILL CQ O e a i l s ID CO 7 u P J i - r e f i o gtshy
-BOREHOLE cc lt Pop OP ROCK 7^2 s
6 PAL CO 76 Z
782 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 9 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
33J BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN S i l jReyroAjrpound pet-ter- SpoundAL ^ 2ycr2e^c^__yoz_7i
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING T P A P L
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 8 2 y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
Thgr ltp7 ^
bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3
FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7
PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP
GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^
WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P
GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs
UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H
2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y
r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7
Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ
t tr ^ A bull T X V pound
yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO
980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE
lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L
CO 3
m^ j m j
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B
BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7
PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT
K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc
WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE
CO
O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I
L3
LU f o r O e - h a i l s O
if CC
YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt
dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer
CO SfAplusmn37o
J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN
3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z
S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7
PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X
GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co
WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY
o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06
PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P
CO z o p yio
H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3
111
t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt
S ^ A L 3 CO yo
230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)
OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0
GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7
PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R
GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)
l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo
TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s
Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO
O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito
H Q
rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ ^^7ropxpP
p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt
s CO 67
M TOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
lt
CO z o p 3
i j j
a r) CO CQ Z) CO
gtbull a lt 2
CO
DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V
PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp
WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^
REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA
lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^
p p e - 72^
SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L
786
206
BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^
TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn
Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri
T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^
CGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL
-BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC
7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2
DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX
GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7
p d P OP Floe^
CO
O Ishy5 2 0 shy
bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
CJ
UJ
t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T
5poundAt^ 29 q
3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC
WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ
DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c
60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^
REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound
g o DEPTH
ELEVATION
_ pound GROUND SURFICE
I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC
CONCRETE(TYPICALLY
SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)
73PPFOAXrp SEAL
SloL 70
bull bull bull
I bullPROTE
TYPE
ECTIVE CASING bdquo
CO
o
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
C_)
LJ
t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
t l 2S2 O
gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302
322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2
P-^^ nP I ^
WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^
DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72
PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J
GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o
WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
o - t P V C i r o m
f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE Sree^L y x
V
CO
o 70
1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL
bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO
u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO
100
Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
NOTE NOT TO SCALt
vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC
y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19
Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i
ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^
Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O
SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L
CO
o
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
u UJ
t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r
S P A L
CO 3
3 ^
361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)
s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P
S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Jvj-iw-fili
IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A
EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N
^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull
^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^
CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA
Prepared for the
RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
OCTOBER 1981
CE MAGUIRE INC
PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND
Architects bull Engineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI
October 5 1981 CEM 3869
Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903
Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill
Dear Mr Delfino
In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area
The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects
Very truly yours
CE MAGUIRE INC
Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager
Enclosure
CMPdw
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK
3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX
TABLE NO TITLE
HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
FIGURE NO TITLE
1 LOCATION MAP
2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
FINAL GRADING PLAN
PAGE
1
5
9
PAGE
6
8
PAGE
2
11
DRAWING NO
1
2
3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
Two observation wells were installed at this location between September 28 and 30 Well WE87-1B-B was installed to a depth of 67 feet and sealed in bedrock Well WE87-1B-A was installed to a depth of 368 feet in fill material The remainder of the borehole was then sealed using a bentonite grout
Borehole WE87-1C was performed approximately 20 feet to the southeast of location WE87-1B on September 30 1987 Soils at this location were sampled continuously down from the surface in an attempt to recover a sample of the PVC cap material A sample of this material was recovered from a depth of 77 feet (plusmn) Based upon a discussion between Mr Ken Wenger and Mr Hartley this borehole was terminated at a depth of 8 feet and sealed with bentonite grout on October 1 1987 GZA Drilling Inc left the site on October 1 1987 after steam cleaning all equipment
3) On September 22 1987 Mr Ralph L Gumpert an industrial hygienist with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) conducted an unannounced inspection of the CLF WE87-1 drilling activities The inspection resulted in verbal comments present by OSHA to GZAs field engineer concerning the inadequate capacity of GZAs two eye wash bottles and the lack of emergency communication devices
4) September 22 1987 meeting is held with Wehren Engineering GZA subcontractor responsible for preparation of the feasibility study to discuss the project and scope of work Wehren is currently preparing an FS work plan and is developing contract documents for GZAs review
5) Several problems associated with the drilling effort were encountered On September 23 1987 GZA spoke with Ken Wenger about these problems and to agree upon a solution
RIAL and GZA personnel had begun development of landfill well WE87-3 using a submissible air lift pump At the completion of this effort after removing at least the volume of water introduced to the well during packer testing it was realized the well had significantly shifted because of landfill operations conducted in the near vicinity of the well After repeated efforts over several days to remove the pump it was successfully removed from the well This experience made it obvious that the real potential exists for loosing this well because of significant well movement and potential breakage of the casing Accordingly GZA requested EPAs verbal comments andor approval of GZAs proposed sampling plan so that groundwater samples could be collected from all landfill wells as soon as possible to avoid the risk of eventual well loss EPA was informed that GZA and RIAL will proceed with well sampling the next week using the proposed plan unless we hear otherwise EPA was agreeable to this approach but suggested we contact CDM to determine status of their plan review On September 24 1987 GZA contacted CDM T Pederson was not in at that time On September 25 1987 CDM
returned phone call at which time it was noted that the sampling plan had not been review GZA presented their concerns over well shifting and potential problems CDM agreed and committed to present comments by the following week
The second drilling issue that emerged during this period involved drilling on the former hazardous waste disposal area (WE87-1) The location of this boring was selected based on recommendations made Jim Doorley (RISWMC) based his best recollection of the locations of the hazardous waste trenches relative to the capped area Observations made while drilling at the location resulted in the determination that the boring was most likely not within the capped portion of the waste cell At the same time RISWMC provided GZA with a copy of a closure plan prepared for the RISWMC by C E Maguire (copy enclosed)
Based on a map showing the location of the waste cell in that closure plan GZA relocated the WE87-1 boring to the approximate center of the apparent capped area This information was presented to EPA during our September 23 1987 phone conversation
6) On September 25 1987 GZA spoke with John Zannos (EPA) regarding EPAs position concerning the use of drilling foam during the advancement of the multi-level wells The use of foam had been suggested by Guild Drilling Co to help remove rock fragments in the wells which result in lower drilling rates EPAs position with regard to the use of foam were (1) it could not be used (2) foaming agents often contain organic constituents and (3) can only be used if we risk loosing the hole and only after EPA approval GZA acknowledged position and transferred information to Guild Drilling
7) On September 30 1987 another drilling issue emerged with regard to drilling at the WE87-1 location Following the completion of drilling and installation of sampling wells at this location GZA moved the drill rig approximately 20 feet to the south of the WE87-1 boring in order to more accurately assess surface conditions within the capped area ie the presence of fly ash (Note this intensive sampling effort was beyond the agreed upon approach which involved sampling at 5-foot intervals until fly ash material was encountered for 10 feet) At a depth of approximately 77 feet the liner material was encountered This observation supports observed condition in WE87-1 suggesting that we have successfully installed a well within the capped region of site GZA does not suggest that it was determined that the well is placed within a former disposal trench since this was not the primary objective of this effort and not part of GZAs Scope of Work or Work Plan Recommendations were made to GZA by CDM to continue drilling at this location to bedrock The objective of this recommendation was not presented GZA did not agree with this approach since it essentially commits us to an additional week of drilling without a clear objective Accordingly the hole was terminated at approximately 77 feet
and grout filled This information and GZAs approach was presented to RISWMC and EPA Both parties agreed with our approach EPA committed that if warranted they may require GZA to return to this area to perform additional testing GZA acknowledged with the understanding that additional drilling activities are outside the present Scope of Work and therefore must result in contractual consent agreemervE) and schedule modifications TTT bullmdash
8) GZA reviewed RIDOH residential well sampling data this reporting period and began incorporation of this data along with the EPACDM residential well results onto a survey map which indicates location of sampling points well status (activeinactive) and the current or planned status of the Johnston water supply lines Of cruciai significance in this effort is the fact that the RIDOH sampling location are relative only ie street name without address number This hampers GZAs efforts in accurately assessing potential seeks off-site impacts and therefore we seek EPAs assistance in obtaining more detailed information
9) On October 14 1987 GZA returned a call to John Zannos (EPA) at which time information relative to drilling status was presented John presented concerns over drilling efforts at the WE87-1 location based on CDMs comments Although the specifics were not known it was discussed that GZA may not have been proceeding with agreed upon approach GZA noted that they felt they had and sought to resolve any outstanding issues It was agreed to talk about perceived problems at the upcoming October 23 1987 meeting EPA also noted concern over size of borehole (multi-level wells) which may make them incompatible with Waterloo systems EPA suggested that EPA contact Weston Geophysical to perform caliper logging measurements prior to ordering Waterloo system GZA agreed
10) Air monitoring was initiated at the site also during this period The air sampling was conductance in accordance with GZA revised air monitoring plan and based on verbal comments presented to GZA from CDM The air monitoring effort involved the collection of air samples upwind and downwind of the WE87-1 drilling location during and subsequent to drilling In addition to the preliminary air monitoring effort which was designed to address logistical and analytical considerations four additional rounds have or will be completed at the site
GZX
PROBLEMS RESOLVED
1) GZA receives RIDOH residential well sampling data
GZX
V
DATE INSTALLED ^ ^ ^ f ^ ^ ^ T J ^ J PRmFCT z^^^ t^^ ^^ c y y y^7=s LOCATION
GZAENGIMFFR ^ f ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ gt ^ X ^ ^ mMTRATTnP
BORING Wo U7pound f t - tG FILE No C^QOHt- lR
y i ^ r c ^ y i
(S^ ZA 7 gt - y SZT^i^
WEATHER mKiniTinM ^ - y ^ cy ^ npii ^ FR y i ^ h u i y j ^ ^ ^ v T c K
REMARKS A U y 7 E l Q U R M pound y V 7 ^ A R ^ 7=-y0Z
A D e p ^ h -fc o p a - f
tn
o H 3 J 3 EvroAOT^
(SPOUT o UJ
oc
CO 03
CO
u o 211 gtshycc lt QepToATre
PPLLET 5 pound A L
CO
7 8 ^
Asyli
- T P P O r 6 U A f lt D P X P ^
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
bullPROTECTIVE CASING ^ - i
bull1-12 SCHO 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE SAND BflCKOLL
BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (QOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO S C M X
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ss DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT r 9 i H y
cOLOBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
cc
BORING Mn 7Z7poundf^7-77i FILE No r-laquo^gr^ DATE INSTALLED f ^ f - ^ ^ -30 - ^7
PROJECT Sf in ^^^^oA PXPS LOCATION L^^ J ylty ^ zeuro^
GZA EhiGlNFFR P^^y S i ^ ^ - ^ Z Y y CONTRACTOR G Z A lt^^^^-^^ 3^^ C
WEATHER rrgtMrgtiTinMlt C7ea r ^70 6 DRILLER A r 7 ^ c z r - ^ ^ ^ s lt7 ^
REMARKS yU7ZlBji^TpoundZyAdpoundAZP^ A Y j P =^^crAA P i c^Z^ S6ZZIZ^P Z^-PPz^
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
I bullPROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE
CO bullz o Q
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ AP j ^ y - ^ ^ ^ o PAlt5P J Plt07
D ^ P A t L S CO bull r iNC to COAnOC G A N D BACKnLL CO My CO
u o gtshyQ BP^PaTTPPP BOREHOLE lt PP L(PP
ID CO HHlt
i2^ bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
1-12 SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
686 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
696^m bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING Aij 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 67 Z z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
WELL N a r y i f ^ - ^ 4 BORING Wo 7J7E2 FILE No C - 3 0 0 Z t t ^ DATE raquoMlaquoTAiiFn ^ - r - ^ - f 6 - P 7
PROJECT C g n f r d I k lt ^ r d - f t l f ^ p S LOCATION
GZA ENGINEER ^ ^ y G u m z n e l y y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A O ^ i i i i n Q XL DS^ WEATHER CONDITIONS C g ^ ^ ^ 8 o S HRII FR X gt ^ tn J ^ P e i r r y REMARKS ALL AAf^ASURrvXeAZPS Ay(P POM P O P O P ( P U A P O y^J7PB
bullGROUND SURFACE
Dejcih -i-o op o f CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL
P V C - O J e A - y i o s h (TYPICALLY 05 THICK)
U^ell Q^posh PROTECrriVE CASING ^ TVPP ^ I T E E L S X H S 6 g ^ f o y i ^ 4rr ^ y ^ r e
p y CO
S e a cuf y4gt 7ltir t7
E 1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
6 y t f ^ ^ a ^00 ^ o UJ y^O 3 47^i7S a bull if 7^ ir o lt SSA7ro 7srz^
CO CpoundMe^ZT bull glMS tQ COARSE SAND BACKF1UU CQ
GlRouT
Q a p p iTo)( traquo^4 y r 7 y
bullBOREHOLE P 6 7
QpoundArrozrr^ Z3 7gt^LL e r CO II
67 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I-12SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (001 SLDTS)
77 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCMX
jpMym
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING J ^ A P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT _ ^ i Z l
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
i^Z^ WELL N a ^ ^ ^ r V ^ BORING Ho AlpoundAl lA-FILE No C-^ltgt(^7-7^ DATE INSTALLED 8 S 8 7 - ^ lt S - 8 7
PROJECT Cezii^c^ l L ^ ^ o 7 A 7 P P ^ S LOCATION John^-f^on 1 PXshyGZA FNfiiMFFR Po S o t raquo ^ e r y C0NTR5CT0R GZA 0^77^^ nc WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl^lt^Y^ S ^ DRILLER - Pe i - f ^y shyZ^yai^CREMARKS bull
QO DEPTH C GROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
-PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE j
CO
o Q
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE oo LJ I a- 7 t 5 e e P a ^ e I cr CO P o r bull FINE lto COARSE SAND aOiCKFILL CQ O e a i l s ID CO 7 u P J i - r e f i o gtshy
-BOREHOLE cc lt Pop OP ROCK 7^2 s
6 PAL CO 76 Z
782 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 9 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
33J BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN S i l jReyroAjrpound pet-ter- SpoundAL ^ 2ycr2e^c^__yoz_7i
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING T P A P L
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 8 2 y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
Thgr ltp7 ^
bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3
FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7
PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP
GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^
WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P
GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs
UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H
2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y
r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7
Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ
t tr ^ A bull T X V pound
yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO
980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE
lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L
CO 3
m^ j m j
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B
BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7
PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT
K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc
WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE
CO
O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I
L3
LU f o r O e - h a i l s O
if CC
YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt
dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer
CO SfAplusmn37o
J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN
3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z
S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7
PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X
GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co
WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY
o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06
PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P
CO z o p yio
H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3
111
t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt
S ^ A L 3 CO yo
230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)
OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0
GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7
PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R
GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)
l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo
TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s
Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO
O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito
H Q
rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ ^^7ropxpP
p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt
s CO 67
M TOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
lt
CO z o p 3
i j j
a r) CO CQ Z) CO
gtbull a lt 2
CO
DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V
PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp
WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^
REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA
lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^
p p e - 72^
SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L
786
206
BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^
TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn
Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri
T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^
CGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL
-BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC
7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2
DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX
GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7
p d P OP Floe^
CO
O Ishy5 2 0 shy
bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
CJ
UJ
t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T
5poundAt^ 29 q
3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC
WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ
DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c
60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^
REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound
g o DEPTH
ELEVATION
_ pound GROUND SURFICE
I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC
CONCRETE(TYPICALLY
SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)
73PPFOAXrp SEAL
SloL 70
bull bull bull
I bullPROTE
TYPE
ECTIVE CASING bdquo
CO
o
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
C_)
LJ
t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
t l 2S2 O
gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302
322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2
P-^^ nP I ^
WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^
DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72
PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J
GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o
WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
o - t P V C i r o m
f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE Sree^L y x
V
CO
o 70
1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL
bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO
u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO
100
Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
NOTE NOT TO SCALt
vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC
y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19
Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i
ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^
Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O
SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L
CO
o
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
u UJ
t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r
S P A L
CO 3
3 ^
361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)
s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P
S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Jvj-iw-fili
IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A
EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N
^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull
^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^
CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA
Prepared for the
RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
OCTOBER 1981
CE MAGUIRE INC
PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND
Architects bull Engineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI
October 5 1981 CEM 3869
Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903
Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill
Dear Mr Delfino
In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area
The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects
Very truly yours
CE MAGUIRE INC
Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager
Enclosure
CMPdw
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK
3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX
TABLE NO TITLE
HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
FIGURE NO TITLE
1 LOCATION MAP
2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
FINAL GRADING PLAN
PAGE
1
5
9
PAGE
6
8
PAGE
2
11
DRAWING NO
1
2
3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
returned phone call at which time it was noted that the sampling plan had not been review GZA presented their concerns over well shifting and potential problems CDM agreed and committed to present comments by the following week
The second drilling issue that emerged during this period involved drilling on the former hazardous waste disposal area (WE87-1) The location of this boring was selected based on recommendations made Jim Doorley (RISWMC) based his best recollection of the locations of the hazardous waste trenches relative to the capped area Observations made while drilling at the location resulted in the determination that the boring was most likely not within the capped portion of the waste cell At the same time RISWMC provided GZA with a copy of a closure plan prepared for the RISWMC by C E Maguire (copy enclosed)
Based on a map showing the location of the waste cell in that closure plan GZA relocated the WE87-1 boring to the approximate center of the apparent capped area This information was presented to EPA during our September 23 1987 phone conversation
6) On September 25 1987 GZA spoke with John Zannos (EPA) regarding EPAs position concerning the use of drilling foam during the advancement of the multi-level wells The use of foam had been suggested by Guild Drilling Co to help remove rock fragments in the wells which result in lower drilling rates EPAs position with regard to the use of foam were (1) it could not be used (2) foaming agents often contain organic constituents and (3) can only be used if we risk loosing the hole and only after EPA approval GZA acknowledged position and transferred information to Guild Drilling
7) On September 30 1987 another drilling issue emerged with regard to drilling at the WE87-1 location Following the completion of drilling and installation of sampling wells at this location GZA moved the drill rig approximately 20 feet to the south of the WE87-1 boring in order to more accurately assess surface conditions within the capped area ie the presence of fly ash (Note this intensive sampling effort was beyond the agreed upon approach which involved sampling at 5-foot intervals until fly ash material was encountered for 10 feet) At a depth of approximately 77 feet the liner material was encountered This observation supports observed condition in WE87-1 suggesting that we have successfully installed a well within the capped region of site GZA does not suggest that it was determined that the well is placed within a former disposal trench since this was not the primary objective of this effort and not part of GZAs Scope of Work or Work Plan Recommendations were made to GZA by CDM to continue drilling at this location to bedrock The objective of this recommendation was not presented GZA did not agree with this approach since it essentially commits us to an additional week of drilling without a clear objective Accordingly the hole was terminated at approximately 77 feet
and grout filled This information and GZAs approach was presented to RISWMC and EPA Both parties agreed with our approach EPA committed that if warranted they may require GZA to return to this area to perform additional testing GZA acknowledged with the understanding that additional drilling activities are outside the present Scope of Work and therefore must result in contractual consent agreemervE) and schedule modifications TTT bullmdash
8) GZA reviewed RIDOH residential well sampling data this reporting period and began incorporation of this data along with the EPACDM residential well results onto a survey map which indicates location of sampling points well status (activeinactive) and the current or planned status of the Johnston water supply lines Of cruciai significance in this effort is the fact that the RIDOH sampling location are relative only ie street name without address number This hampers GZAs efforts in accurately assessing potential seeks off-site impacts and therefore we seek EPAs assistance in obtaining more detailed information
9) On October 14 1987 GZA returned a call to John Zannos (EPA) at which time information relative to drilling status was presented John presented concerns over drilling efforts at the WE87-1 location based on CDMs comments Although the specifics were not known it was discussed that GZA may not have been proceeding with agreed upon approach GZA noted that they felt they had and sought to resolve any outstanding issues It was agreed to talk about perceived problems at the upcoming October 23 1987 meeting EPA also noted concern over size of borehole (multi-level wells) which may make them incompatible with Waterloo systems EPA suggested that EPA contact Weston Geophysical to perform caliper logging measurements prior to ordering Waterloo system GZA agreed
10) Air monitoring was initiated at the site also during this period The air sampling was conductance in accordance with GZA revised air monitoring plan and based on verbal comments presented to GZA from CDM The air monitoring effort involved the collection of air samples upwind and downwind of the WE87-1 drilling location during and subsequent to drilling In addition to the preliminary air monitoring effort which was designed to address logistical and analytical considerations four additional rounds have or will be completed at the site
GZX
PROBLEMS RESOLVED
1) GZA receives RIDOH residential well sampling data
GZX
V
DATE INSTALLED ^ ^ ^ f ^ ^ ^ T J ^ J PRmFCT z^^^ t^^ ^^ c y y y^7=s LOCATION
GZAENGIMFFR ^ f ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ gt ^ X ^ ^ mMTRATTnP
BORING Wo U7pound f t - tG FILE No C^QOHt- lR
y i ^ r c ^ y i
(S^ ZA 7 gt - y SZT^i^
WEATHER mKiniTinM ^ - y ^ cy ^ npii ^ FR y i ^ h u i y j ^ ^ ^ v T c K
REMARKS A U y 7 E l Q U R M pound y V 7 ^ A R ^ 7=-y0Z
A D e p ^ h -fc o p a - f
tn
o H 3 J 3 EvroAOT^
(SPOUT o UJ
oc
CO 03
CO
u o 211 gtshycc lt QepToATre
PPLLET 5 pound A L
CO
7 8 ^
Asyli
- T P P O r 6 U A f lt D P X P ^
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
bullPROTECTIVE CASING ^ - i
bull1-12 SCHO 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE SAND BflCKOLL
BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (QOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO S C M X
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ss DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT r 9 i H y
cOLOBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
cc
BORING Mn 7Z7poundf^7-77i FILE No r-laquo^gr^ DATE INSTALLED f ^ f - ^ ^ -30 - ^7
PROJECT Sf in ^^^^oA PXPS LOCATION L^^ J ylty ^ zeuro^
GZA EhiGlNFFR P^^y S i ^ ^ - ^ Z Y y CONTRACTOR G Z A lt^^^^-^^ 3^^ C
WEATHER rrgtMrgtiTinMlt C7ea r ^70 6 DRILLER A r 7 ^ c z r - ^ ^ ^ s lt7 ^
REMARKS yU7ZlBji^TpoundZyAdpoundAZP^ A Y j P =^^crAA P i c^Z^ S6ZZIZ^P Z^-PPz^
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
I bullPROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE
CO bullz o Q
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ AP j ^ y - ^ ^ ^ o PAlt5P J Plt07
D ^ P A t L S CO bull r iNC to COAnOC G A N D BACKnLL CO My CO
u o gtshyQ BP^PaTTPPP BOREHOLE lt PP L(PP
ID CO HHlt
i2^ bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
1-12 SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
686 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
696^m bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING Aij 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 67 Z z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
WELL N a r y i f ^ - ^ 4 BORING Wo 7J7E2 FILE No C - 3 0 0 Z t t ^ DATE raquoMlaquoTAiiFn ^ - r - ^ - f 6 - P 7
PROJECT C g n f r d I k lt ^ r d - f t l f ^ p S LOCATION
GZA ENGINEER ^ ^ y G u m z n e l y y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A O ^ i i i i n Q XL DS^ WEATHER CONDITIONS C g ^ ^ ^ 8 o S HRII FR X gt ^ tn J ^ P e i r r y REMARKS ALL AAf^ASURrvXeAZPS Ay(P POM P O P O P ( P U A P O y^J7PB
bullGROUND SURFACE
Dejcih -i-o op o f CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL
P V C - O J e A - y i o s h (TYPICALLY 05 THICK)
U^ell Q^posh PROTECrriVE CASING ^ TVPP ^ I T E E L S X H S 6 g ^ f o y i ^ 4rr ^ y ^ r e
p y CO
S e a cuf y4gt 7ltir t7
E 1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
6 y t f ^ ^ a ^00 ^ o UJ y^O 3 47^i7S a bull if 7^ ir o lt SSA7ro 7srz^
CO CpoundMe^ZT bull glMS tQ COARSE SAND BACKF1UU CQ
GlRouT
Q a p p iTo)( traquo^4 y r 7 y
bullBOREHOLE P 6 7
QpoundArrozrr^ Z3 7gt^LL e r CO II
67 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I-12SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (001 SLDTS)
77 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCMX
jpMym
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING J ^ A P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT _ ^ i Z l
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
i^Z^ WELL N a ^ ^ ^ r V ^ BORING Ho AlpoundAl lA-FILE No C-^ltgt(^7-7^ DATE INSTALLED 8 S 8 7 - ^ lt S - 8 7
PROJECT Cezii^c^ l L ^ ^ o 7 A 7 P P ^ S LOCATION John^-f^on 1 PXshyGZA FNfiiMFFR Po S o t raquo ^ e r y C0NTR5CT0R GZA 0^77^^ nc WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl^lt^Y^ S ^ DRILLER - Pe i - f ^y shyZ^yai^CREMARKS bull
QO DEPTH C GROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
-PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE j
CO
o Q
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE oo LJ I a- 7 t 5 e e P a ^ e I cr CO P o r bull FINE lto COARSE SAND aOiCKFILL CQ O e a i l s ID CO 7 u P J i - r e f i o gtshy
-BOREHOLE cc lt Pop OP ROCK 7^2 s
6 PAL CO 76 Z
782 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 9 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
33J BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN S i l jReyroAjrpound pet-ter- SpoundAL ^ 2ycr2e^c^__yoz_7i
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING T P A P L
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 8 2 y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
Thgr ltp7 ^
bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3
FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7
PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP
GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^
WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P
GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs
UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H
2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y
r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7
Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ
t tr ^ A bull T X V pound
yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO
980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE
lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L
CO 3
m^ j m j
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B
BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7
PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT
K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc
WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE
CO
O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I
L3
LU f o r O e - h a i l s O
if CC
YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt
dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer
CO SfAplusmn37o
J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN
3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z
S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7
PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X
GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co
WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY
o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06
PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P
CO z o p yio
H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3
111
t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt
S ^ A L 3 CO yo
230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)
OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0
GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7
PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R
GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)
l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo
TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s
Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO
O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito
H Q
rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ ^^7ropxpP
p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt
s CO 67
M TOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
lt
CO z o p 3
i j j
a r) CO CQ Z) CO
gtbull a lt 2
CO
DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V
PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp
WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^
REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA
lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^
p p e - 72^
SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L
786
206
BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^
TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn
Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri
T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^
CGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL
-BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC
7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2
DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX
GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7
p d P OP Floe^
CO
O Ishy5 2 0 shy
bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
CJ
UJ
t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T
5poundAt^ 29 q
3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC
WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ
DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c
60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^
REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound
g o DEPTH
ELEVATION
_ pound GROUND SURFICE
I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC
CONCRETE(TYPICALLY
SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)
73PPFOAXrp SEAL
SloL 70
bull bull bull
I bullPROTE
TYPE
ECTIVE CASING bdquo
CO
o
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
C_)
LJ
t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
t l 2S2 O
gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302
322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2
P-^^ nP I ^
WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^
DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72
PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J
GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o
WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
o - t P V C i r o m
f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE Sree^L y x
V
CO
o 70
1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL
bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO
u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO
100
Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
NOTE NOT TO SCALt
vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC
y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19
Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i
ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^
Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O
SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L
CO
o
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
u UJ
t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r
S P A L
CO 3
3 ^
361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)
s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P
S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Jvj-iw-fili
IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A
EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N
^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull
^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^
CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA
Prepared for the
RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
OCTOBER 1981
CE MAGUIRE INC
PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND
Architects bull Engineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI
October 5 1981 CEM 3869
Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903
Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill
Dear Mr Delfino
In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area
The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects
Very truly yours
CE MAGUIRE INC
Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager
Enclosure
CMPdw
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK
3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX
TABLE NO TITLE
HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
FIGURE NO TITLE
1 LOCATION MAP
2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
FINAL GRADING PLAN
PAGE
1
5
9
PAGE
6
8
PAGE
2
11
DRAWING NO
1
2
3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
and grout filled This information and GZAs approach was presented to RISWMC and EPA Both parties agreed with our approach EPA committed that if warranted they may require GZA to return to this area to perform additional testing GZA acknowledged with the understanding that additional drilling activities are outside the present Scope of Work and therefore must result in contractual consent agreemervE) and schedule modifications TTT bullmdash
8) GZA reviewed RIDOH residential well sampling data this reporting period and began incorporation of this data along with the EPACDM residential well results onto a survey map which indicates location of sampling points well status (activeinactive) and the current or planned status of the Johnston water supply lines Of cruciai significance in this effort is the fact that the RIDOH sampling location are relative only ie street name without address number This hampers GZAs efforts in accurately assessing potential seeks off-site impacts and therefore we seek EPAs assistance in obtaining more detailed information
9) On October 14 1987 GZA returned a call to John Zannos (EPA) at which time information relative to drilling status was presented John presented concerns over drilling efforts at the WE87-1 location based on CDMs comments Although the specifics were not known it was discussed that GZA may not have been proceeding with agreed upon approach GZA noted that they felt they had and sought to resolve any outstanding issues It was agreed to talk about perceived problems at the upcoming October 23 1987 meeting EPA also noted concern over size of borehole (multi-level wells) which may make them incompatible with Waterloo systems EPA suggested that EPA contact Weston Geophysical to perform caliper logging measurements prior to ordering Waterloo system GZA agreed
10) Air monitoring was initiated at the site also during this period The air sampling was conductance in accordance with GZA revised air monitoring plan and based on verbal comments presented to GZA from CDM The air monitoring effort involved the collection of air samples upwind and downwind of the WE87-1 drilling location during and subsequent to drilling In addition to the preliminary air monitoring effort which was designed to address logistical and analytical considerations four additional rounds have or will be completed at the site
GZX
PROBLEMS RESOLVED
1) GZA receives RIDOH residential well sampling data
GZX
V
DATE INSTALLED ^ ^ ^ f ^ ^ ^ T J ^ J PRmFCT z^^^ t^^ ^^ c y y y^7=s LOCATION
GZAENGIMFFR ^ f ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ gt ^ X ^ ^ mMTRATTnP
BORING Wo U7pound f t - tG FILE No C^QOHt- lR
y i ^ r c ^ y i
(S^ ZA 7 gt - y SZT^i^
WEATHER mKiniTinM ^ - y ^ cy ^ npii ^ FR y i ^ h u i y j ^ ^ ^ v T c K
REMARKS A U y 7 E l Q U R M pound y V 7 ^ A R ^ 7=-y0Z
A D e p ^ h -fc o p a - f
tn
o H 3 J 3 EvroAOT^
(SPOUT o UJ
oc
CO 03
CO
u o 211 gtshycc lt QepToATre
PPLLET 5 pound A L
CO
7 8 ^
Asyli
- T P P O r 6 U A f lt D P X P ^
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
bullPROTECTIVE CASING ^ - i
bull1-12 SCHO 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE SAND BflCKOLL
BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (QOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO S C M X
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ss DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT r 9 i H y
cOLOBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
cc
BORING Mn 7Z7poundf^7-77i FILE No r-laquo^gr^ DATE INSTALLED f ^ f - ^ ^ -30 - ^7
PROJECT Sf in ^^^^oA PXPS LOCATION L^^ J ylty ^ zeuro^
GZA EhiGlNFFR P^^y S i ^ ^ - ^ Z Y y CONTRACTOR G Z A lt^^^^-^^ 3^^ C
WEATHER rrgtMrgtiTinMlt C7ea r ^70 6 DRILLER A r 7 ^ c z r - ^ ^ ^ s lt7 ^
REMARKS yU7ZlBji^TpoundZyAdpoundAZP^ A Y j P =^^crAA P i c^Z^ S6ZZIZ^P Z^-PPz^
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
I bullPROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE
CO bullz o Q
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ AP j ^ y - ^ ^ ^ o PAlt5P J Plt07
D ^ P A t L S CO bull r iNC to COAnOC G A N D BACKnLL CO My CO
u o gtshyQ BP^PaTTPPP BOREHOLE lt PP L(PP
ID CO HHlt
i2^ bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
1-12 SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
686 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
696^m bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING Aij 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 67 Z z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
WELL N a r y i f ^ - ^ 4 BORING Wo 7J7E2 FILE No C - 3 0 0 Z t t ^ DATE raquoMlaquoTAiiFn ^ - r - ^ - f 6 - P 7
PROJECT C g n f r d I k lt ^ r d - f t l f ^ p S LOCATION
GZA ENGINEER ^ ^ y G u m z n e l y y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A O ^ i i i i n Q XL DS^ WEATHER CONDITIONS C g ^ ^ ^ 8 o S HRII FR X gt ^ tn J ^ P e i r r y REMARKS ALL AAf^ASURrvXeAZPS Ay(P POM P O P O P ( P U A P O y^J7PB
bullGROUND SURFACE
Dejcih -i-o op o f CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL
P V C - O J e A - y i o s h (TYPICALLY 05 THICK)
U^ell Q^posh PROTECrriVE CASING ^ TVPP ^ I T E E L S X H S 6 g ^ f o y i ^ 4rr ^ y ^ r e
p y CO
S e a cuf y4gt 7ltir t7
E 1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
6 y t f ^ ^ a ^00 ^ o UJ y^O 3 47^i7S a bull if 7^ ir o lt SSA7ro 7srz^
CO CpoundMe^ZT bull glMS tQ COARSE SAND BACKF1UU CQ
GlRouT
Q a p p iTo)( traquo^4 y r 7 y
bullBOREHOLE P 6 7
QpoundArrozrr^ Z3 7gt^LL e r CO II
67 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I-12SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (001 SLDTS)
77 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCMX
jpMym
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING J ^ A P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT _ ^ i Z l
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
i^Z^ WELL N a ^ ^ ^ r V ^ BORING Ho AlpoundAl lA-FILE No C-^ltgt(^7-7^ DATE INSTALLED 8 S 8 7 - ^ lt S - 8 7
PROJECT Cezii^c^ l L ^ ^ o 7 A 7 P P ^ S LOCATION John^-f^on 1 PXshyGZA FNfiiMFFR Po S o t raquo ^ e r y C0NTR5CT0R GZA 0^77^^ nc WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl^lt^Y^ S ^ DRILLER - Pe i - f ^y shyZ^yai^CREMARKS bull
QO DEPTH C GROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
-PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE j
CO
o Q
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE oo LJ I a- 7 t 5 e e P a ^ e I cr CO P o r bull FINE lto COARSE SAND aOiCKFILL CQ O e a i l s ID CO 7 u P J i - r e f i o gtshy
-BOREHOLE cc lt Pop OP ROCK 7^2 s
6 PAL CO 76 Z
782 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 9 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
33J BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN S i l jReyroAjrpound pet-ter- SpoundAL ^ 2ycr2e^c^__yoz_7i
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING T P A P L
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 8 2 y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
Thgr ltp7 ^
bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3
FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7
PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP
GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^
WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P
GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs
UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H
2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y
r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7
Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ
t tr ^ A bull T X V pound
yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO
980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE
lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L
CO 3
m^ j m j
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B
BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7
PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT
K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc
WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE
CO
O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I
L3
LU f o r O e - h a i l s O
if CC
YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt
dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer
CO SfAplusmn37o
J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN
3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z
S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7
PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X
GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co
WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY
o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06
PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P
CO z o p yio
H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3
111
t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt
S ^ A L 3 CO yo
230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)
OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0
GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7
PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R
GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)
l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo
TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s
Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO
O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito
H Q
rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ ^^7ropxpP
p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt
s CO 67
M TOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
lt
CO z o p 3
i j j
a r) CO CQ Z) CO
gtbull a lt 2
CO
DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V
PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp
WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^
REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA
lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^
p p e - 72^
SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L
786
206
BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^
TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn
Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri
T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^
CGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL
-BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC
7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2
DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX
GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7
p d P OP Floe^
CO
O Ishy5 2 0 shy
bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
CJ
UJ
t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T
5poundAt^ 29 q
3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC
WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ
DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c
60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^
REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound
g o DEPTH
ELEVATION
_ pound GROUND SURFICE
I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC
CONCRETE(TYPICALLY
SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)
73PPFOAXrp SEAL
SloL 70
bull bull bull
I bullPROTE
TYPE
ECTIVE CASING bdquo
CO
o
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
C_)
LJ
t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
t l 2S2 O
gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302
322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2
P-^^ nP I ^
WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^
DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72
PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J
GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o
WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
o - t P V C i r o m
f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE Sree^L y x
V
CO
o 70
1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL
bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO
u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO
100
Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
NOTE NOT TO SCALt
vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC
y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19
Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i
ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^
Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O
SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L
CO
o
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
u UJ
t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r
S P A L
CO 3
3 ^
361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)
s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P
S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Jvj-iw-fili
IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A
EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N
^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull
^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^
CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA
Prepared for the
RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
OCTOBER 1981
CE MAGUIRE INC
PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND
Architects bull Engineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI
October 5 1981 CEM 3869
Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903
Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill
Dear Mr Delfino
In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area
The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects
Very truly yours
CE MAGUIRE INC
Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager
Enclosure
CMPdw
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK
3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX
TABLE NO TITLE
HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
FIGURE NO TITLE
1 LOCATION MAP
2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
FINAL GRADING PLAN
PAGE
1
5
9
PAGE
6
8
PAGE
2
11
DRAWING NO
1
2
3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
PROBLEMS RESOLVED
1) GZA receives RIDOH residential well sampling data
GZX
V
DATE INSTALLED ^ ^ ^ f ^ ^ ^ T J ^ J PRmFCT z^^^ t^^ ^^ c y y y^7=s LOCATION
GZAENGIMFFR ^ f ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ gt ^ X ^ ^ mMTRATTnP
BORING Wo U7pound f t - tG FILE No C^QOHt- lR
y i ^ r c ^ y i
(S^ ZA 7 gt - y SZT^i^
WEATHER mKiniTinM ^ - y ^ cy ^ npii ^ FR y i ^ h u i y j ^ ^ ^ v T c K
REMARKS A U y 7 E l Q U R M pound y V 7 ^ A R ^ 7=-y0Z
A D e p ^ h -fc o p a - f
tn
o H 3 J 3 EvroAOT^
(SPOUT o UJ
oc
CO 03
CO
u o 211 gtshycc lt QepToATre
PPLLET 5 pound A L
CO
7 8 ^
Asyli
- T P P O r 6 U A f lt D P X P ^
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
bullPROTECTIVE CASING ^ - i
bull1-12 SCHO 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE SAND BflCKOLL
BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (QOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO S C M X
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ss DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT r 9 i H y
cOLOBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
cc
BORING Mn 7Z7poundf^7-77i FILE No r-laquo^gr^ DATE INSTALLED f ^ f - ^ ^ -30 - ^7
PROJECT Sf in ^^^^oA PXPS LOCATION L^^ J ylty ^ zeuro^
GZA EhiGlNFFR P^^y S i ^ ^ - ^ Z Y y CONTRACTOR G Z A lt^^^^-^^ 3^^ C
WEATHER rrgtMrgtiTinMlt C7ea r ^70 6 DRILLER A r 7 ^ c z r - ^ ^ ^ s lt7 ^
REMARKS yU7ZlBji^TpoundZyAdpoundAZP^ A Y j P =^^crAA P i c^Z^ S6ZZIZ^P Z^-PPz^
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
I bullPROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE
CO bullz o Q
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ AP j ^ y - ^ ^ ^ o PAlt5P J Plt07
D ^ P A t L S CO bull r iNC to COAnOC G A N D BACKnLL CO My CO
u o gtshyQ BP^PaTTPPP BOREHOLE lt PP L(PP
ID CO HHlt
i2^ bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
1-12 SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
686 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
696^m bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING Aij 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 67 Z z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
WELL N a r y i f ^ - ^ 4 BORING Wo 7J7E2 FILE No C - 3 0 0 Z t t ^ DATE raquoMlaquoTAiiFn ^ - r - ^ - f 6 - P 7
PROJECT C g n f r d I k lt ^ r d - f t l f ^ p S LOCATION
GZA ENGINEER ^ ^ y G u m z n e l y y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A O ^ i i i i n Q XL DS^ WEATHER CONDITIONS C g ^ ^ ^ 8 o S HRII FR X gt ^ tn J ^ P e i r r y REMARKS ALL AAf^ASURrvXeAZPS Ay(P POM P O P O P ( P U A P O y^J7PB
bullGROUND SURFACE
Dejcih -i-o op o f CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL
P V C - O J e A - y i o s h (TYPICALLY 05 THICK)
U^ell Q^posh PROTECrriVE CASING ^ TVPP ^ I T E E L S X H S 6 g ^ f o y i ^ 4rr ^ y ^ r e
p y CO
S e a cuf y4gt 7ltir t7
E 1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
6 y t f ^ ^ a ^00 ^ o UJ y^O 3 47^i7S a bull if 7^ ir o lt SSA7ro 7srz^
CO CpoundMe^ZT bull glMS tQ COARSE SAND BACKF1UU CQ
GlRouT
Q a p p iTo)( traquo^4 y r 7 y
bullBOREHOLE P 6 7
QpoundArrozrr^ Z3 7gt^LL e r CO II
67 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I-12SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (001 SLDTS)
77 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCMX
jpMym
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING J ^ A P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT _ ^ i Z l
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
i^Z^ WELL N a ^ ^ ^ r V ^ BORING Ho AlpoundAl lA-FILE No C-^ltgt(^7-7^ DATE INSTALLED 8 S 8 7 - ^ lt S - 8 7
PROJECT Cezii^c^ l L ^ ^ o 7 A 7 P P ^ S LOCATION John^-f^on 1 PXshyGZA FNfiiMFFR Po S o t raquo ^ e r y C0NTR5CT0R GZA 0^77^^ nc WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl^lt^Y^ S ^ DRILLER - Pe i - f ^y shyZ^yai^CREMARKS bull
QO DEPTH C GROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
-PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE j
CO
o Q
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE oo LJ I a- 7 t 5 e e P a ^ e I cr CO P o r bull FINE lto COARSE SAND aOiCKFILL CQ O e a i l s ID CO 7 u P J i - r e f i o gtshy
-BOREHOLE cc lt Pop OP ROCK 7^2 s
6 PAL CO 76 Z
782 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 9 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
33J BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN S i l jReyroAjrpound pet-ter- SpoundAL ^ 2ycr2e^c^__yoz_7i
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING T P A P L
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 8 2 y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
Thgr ltp7 ^
bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3
FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7
PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP
GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^
WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P
GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs
UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H
2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y
r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7
Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ
t tr ^ A bull T X V pound
yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO
980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE
lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L
CO 3
m^ j m j
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B
BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7
PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT
K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc
WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE
CO
O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I
L3
LU f o r O e - h a i l s O
if CC
YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt
dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer
CO SfAplusmn37o
J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN
3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z
S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7
PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X
GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co
WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY
o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06
PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P
CO z o p yio
H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3
111
t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt
S ^ A L 3 CO yo
230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)
OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0
GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7
PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R
GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)
l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo
TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s
Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO
O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito
H Q
rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ ^^7ropxpP
p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt
s CO 67
M TOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
lt
CO z o p 3
i j j
a r) CO CQ Z) CO
gtbull a lt 2
CO
DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V
PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp
WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^
REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA
lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^
p p e - 72^
SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L
786
206
BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^
TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn
Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri
T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^
CGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL
-BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC
7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2
DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX
GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7
p d P OP Floe^
CO
O Ishy5 2 0 shy
bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
CJ
UJ
t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T
5poundAt^ 29 q
3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC
WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ
DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c
60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^
REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound
g o DEPTH
ELEVATION
_ pound GROUND SURFICE
I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC
CONCRETE(TYPICALLY
SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)
73PPFOAXrp SEAL
SloL 70
bull bull bull
I bullPROTE
TYPE
ECTIVE CASING bdquo
CO
o
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
C_)
LJ
t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
t l 2S2 O
gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302
322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2
P-^^ nP I ^
WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^
DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72
PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J
GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o
WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
o - t P V C i r o m
f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE Sree^L y x
V
CO
o 70
1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL
bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO
u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO
100
Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
NOTE NOT TO SCALt
vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC
y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19
Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i
ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^
Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O
SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L
CO
o
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
u UJ
t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r
S P A L
CO 3
3 ^
361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)
s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P
S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Jvj-iw-fili
IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A
EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N
^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull
^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^
CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA
Prepared for the
RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
OCTOBER 1981
CE MAGUIRE INC
PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND
Architects bull Engineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI
October 5 1981 CEM 3869
Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903
Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill
Dear Mr Delfino
In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area
The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects
Very truly yours
CE MAGUIRE INC
Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager
Enclosure
CMPdw
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK
3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX
TABLE NO TITLE
HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
FIGURE NO TITLE
1 LOCATION MAP
2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
FINAL GRADING PLAN
PAGE
1
5
9
PAGE
6
8
PAGE
2
11
DRAWING NO
1
2
3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
V
DATE INSTALLED ^ ^ ^ f ^ ^ ^ T J ^ J PRmFCT z^^^ t^^ ^^ c y y y^7=s LOCATION
GZAENGIMFFR ^ f ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ gt ^ X ^ ^ mMTRATTnP
BORING Wo U7pound f t - tG FILE No C^QOHt- lR
y i ^ r c ^ y i
(S^ ZA 7 gt - y SZT^i^
WEATHER mKiniTinM ^ - y ^ cy ^ npii ^ FR y i ^ h u i y j ^ ^ ^ v T c K
REMARKS A U y 7 E l Q U R M pound y V 7 ^ A R ^ 7=-y0Z
A D e p ^ h -fc o p a - f
tn
o H 3 J 3 EvroAOT^
(SPOUT o UJ
oc
CO 03
CO
u o 211 gtshycc lt QepToATre
PPLLET 5 pound A L
CO
7 8 ^
Asyli
- T P P O r 6 U A f lt D P X P ^
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
bullPROTECTIVE CASING ^ - i
bull1-12 SCHO 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE SAND BflCKOLL
BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (QOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO S C M X
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ss DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT r 9 i H y
cOLOBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
cc
BORING Mn 7Z7poundf^7-77i FILE No r-laquo^gr^ DATE INSTALLED f ^ f - ^ ^ -30 - ^7
PROJECT Sf in ^^^^oA PXPS LOCATION L^^ J ylty ^ zeuro^
GZA EhiGlNFFR P^^y S i ^ ^ - ^ Z Y y CONTRACTOR G Z A lt^^^^-^^ 3^^ C
WEATHER rrgtMrgtiTinMlt C7ea r ^70 6 DRILLER A r 7 ^ c z r - ^ ^ ^ s lt7 ^
REMARKS yU7ZlBji^TpoundZyAdpoundAZP^ A Y j P =^^crAA P i c^Z^ S6ZZIZ^P Z^-PPz^
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
I bullPROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE
CO bullz o Q
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ AP j ^ y - ^ ^ ^ o PAlt5P J Plt07
D ^ P A t L S CO bull r iNC to COAnOC G A N D BACKnLL CO My CO
u o gtshyQ BP^PaTTPPP BOREHOLE lt PP L(PP
ID CO HHlt
i2^ bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
1-12 SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
686 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
696^m bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING Aij 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 67 Z z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
WELL N a r y i f ^ - ^ 4 BORING Wo 7J7E2 FILE No C - 3 0 0 Z t t ^ DATE raquoMlaquoTAiiFn ^ - r - ^ - f 6 - P 7
PROJECT C g n f r d I k lt ^ r d - f t l f ^ p S LOCATION
GZA ENGINEER ^ ^ y G u m z n e l y y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A O ^ i i i i n Q XL DS^ WEATHER CONDITIONS C g ^ ^ ^ 8 o S HRII FR X gt ^ tn J ^ P e i r r y REMARKS ALL AAf^ASURrvXeAZPS Ay(P POM P O P O P ( P U A P O y^J7PB
bullGROUND SURFACE
Dejcih -i-o op o f CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL
P V C - O J e A - y i o s h (TYPICALLY 05 THICK)
U^ell Q^posh PROTECrriVE CASING ^ TVPP ^ I T E E L S X H S 6 g ^ f o y i ^ 4rr ^ y ^ r e
p y CO
S e a cuf y4gt 7ltir t7
E 1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
6 y t f ^ ^ a ^00 ^ o UJ y^O 3 47^i7S a bull if 7^ ir o lt SSA7ro 7srz^
CO CpoundMe^ZT bull glMS tQ COARSE SAND BACKF1UU CQ
GlRouT
Q a p p iTo)( traquo^4 y r 7 y
bullBOREHOLE P 6 7
QpoundArrozrr^ Z3 7gt^LL e r CO II
67 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I-12SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (001 SLDTS)
77 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCMX
jpMym
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING J ^ A P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT _ ^ i Z l
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
i^Z^ WELL N a ^ ^ ^ r V ^ BORING Ho AlpoundAl lA-FILE No C-^ltgt(^7-7^ DATE INSTALLED 8 S 8 7 - ^ lt S - 8 7
PROJECT Cezii^c^ l L ^ ^ o 7 A 7 P P ^ S LOCATION John^-f^on 1 PXshyGZA FNfiiMFFR Po S o t raquo ^ e r y C0NTR5CT0R GZA 0^77^^ nc WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl^lt^Y^ S ^ DRILLER - Pe i - f ^y shyZ^yai^CREMARKS bull
QO DEPTH C GROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
-PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE j
CO
o Q
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE oo LJ I a- 7 t 5 e e P a ^ e I cr CO P o r bull FINE lto COARSE SAND aOiCKFILL CQ O e a i l s ID CO 7 u P J i - r e f i o gtshy
-BOREHOLE cc lt Pop OP ROCK 7^2 s
6 PAL CO 76 Z
782 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 9 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
33J BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN S i l jReyroAjrpound pet-ter- SpoundAL ^ 2ycr2e^c^__yoz_7i
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING T P A P L
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 8 2 y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
Thgr ltp7 ^
bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3
FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7
PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP
GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^
WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P
GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs
UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H
2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y
r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7
Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ
t tr ^ A bull T X V pound
yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO
980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE
lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L
CO 3
m^ j m j
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B
BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7
PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT
K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc
WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE
CO
O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I
L3
LU f o r O e - h a i l s O
if CC
YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt
dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer
CO SfAplusmn37o
J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN
3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z
S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7
PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X
GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co
WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY
o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06
PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P
CO z o p yio
H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3
111
t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt
S ^ A L 3 CO yo
230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)
OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0
GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7
PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R
GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)
l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo
TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s
Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO
O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito
H Q
rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ ^^7ropxpP
p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt
s CO 67
M TOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
lt
CO z o p 3
i j j
a r) CO CQ Z) CO
gtbull a lt 2
CO
DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V
PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp
WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^
REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA
lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^
p p e - 72^
SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L
786
206
BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^
TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn
Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri
T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^
CGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL
-BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC
7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2
DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX
GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7
p d P OP Floe^
CO
O Ishy5 2 0 shy
bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
CJ
UJ
t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T
5poundAt^ 29 q
3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC
WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ
DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c
60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^
REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound
g o DEPTH
ELEVATION
_ pound GROUND SURFICE
I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC
CONCRETE(TYPICALLY
SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)
73PPFOAXrp SEAL
SloL 70
bull bull bull
I bullPROTE
TYPE
ECTIVE CASING bdquo
CO
o
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
C_)
LJ
t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
t l 2S2 O
gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302
322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2
P-^^ nP I ^
WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^
DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72
PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J
GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o
WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
o - t P V C i r o m
f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE Sree^L y x
V
CO
o 70
1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL
bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO
u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO
100
Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
NOTE NOT TO SCALt
vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC
y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19
Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i
ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^
Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O
SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L
CO
o
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
u UJ
t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r
S P A L
CO 3
3 ^
361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)
s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P
S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Jvj-iw-fili
IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A
EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N
^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull
^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^
CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA
Prepared for the
RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
OCTOBER 1981
CE MAGUIRE INC
PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND
Architects bull Engineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI
October 5 1981 CEM 3869
Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903
Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill
Dear Mr Delfino
In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area
The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects
Very truly yours
CE MAGUIRE INC
Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager
Enclosure
CMPdw
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK
3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX
TABLE NO TITLE
HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
FIGURE NO TITLE
1 LOCATION MAP
2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
FINAL GRADING PLAN
PAGE
1
5
9
PAGE
6
8
PAGE
2
11
DRAWING NO
1
2
3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
cc
BORING Mn 7Z7poundf^7-77i FILE No r-laquo^gr^ DATE INSTALLED f ^ f - ^ ^ -30 - ^7
PROJECT Sf in ^^^^oA PXPS LOCATION L^^ J ylty ^ zeuro^
GZA EhiGlNFFR P^^y S i ^ ^ - ^ Z Y y CONTRACTOR G Z A lt^^^^-^^ 3^^ C
WEATHER rrgtMrgtiTinMlt C7ea r ^70 6 DRILLER A r 7 ^ c z r - ^ ^ ^ s lt7 ^
REMARKS yU7ZlBji^TpoundZyAdpoundAZP^ A Y j P =^^crAA P i c^Z^ S6ZZIZ^P Z^-PPz^
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
I bullPROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE
CO bullz o Q
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ AP j ^ y - ^ ^ ^ o PAlt5P J Plt07
D ^ P A t L S CO bull r iNC to COAnOC G A N D BACKnLL CO My CO
u o gtshyQ BP^PaTTPPP BOREHOLE lt PP L(PP
ID CO HHlt
i2^ bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
1-12 SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
686 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
696^m bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING Aij 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 67 Z z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
WELL N a r y i f ^ - ^ 4 BORING Wo 7J7E2 FILE No C - 3 0 0 Z t t ^ DATE raquoMlaquoTAiiFn ^ - r - ^ - f 6 - P 7
PROJECT C g n f r d I k lt ^ r d - f t l f ^ p S LOCATION
GZA ENGINEER ^ ^ y G u m z n e l y y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A O ^ i i i i n Q XL DS^ WEATHER CONDITIONS C g ^ ^ ^ 8 o S HRII FR X gt ^ tn J ^ P e i r r y REMARKS ALL AAf^ASURrvXeAZPS Ay(P POM P O P O P ( P U A P O y^J7PB
bullGROUND SURFACE
Dejcih -i-o op o f CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL
P V C - O J e A - y i o s h (TYPICALLY 05 THICK)
U^ell Q^posh PROTECrriVE CASING ^ TVPP ^ I T E E L S X H S 6 g ^ f o y i ^ 4rr ^ y ^ r e
p y CO
S e a cuf y4gt 7ltir t7
E 1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
6 y t f ^ ^ a ^00 ^ o UJ y^O 3 47^i7S a bull if 7^ ir o lt SSA7ro 7srz^
CO CpoundMe^ZT bull glMS tQ COARSE SAND BACKF1UU CQ
GlRouT
Q a p p iTo)( traquo^4 y r 7 y
bullBOREHOLE P 6 7
QpoundArrozrr^ Z3 7gt^LL e r CO II
67 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I-12SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (001 SLDTS)
77 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCMX
jpMym
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING J ^ A P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT _ ^ i Z l
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
i^Z^ WELL N a ^ ^ ^ r V ^ BORING Ho AlpoundAl lA-FILE No C-^ltgt(^7-7^ DATE INSTALLED 8 S 8 7 - ^ lt S - 8 7
PROJECT Cezii^c^ l L ^ ^ o 7 A 7 P P ^ S LOCATION John^-f^on 1 PXshyGZA FNfiiMFFR Po S o t raquo ^ e r y C0NTR5CT0R GZA 0^77^^ nc WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl^lt^Y^ S ^ DRILLER - Pe i - f ^y shyZ^yai^CREMARKS bull
QO DEPTH C GROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
-PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE j
CO
o Q
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE oo LJ I a- 7 t 5 e e P a ^ e I cr CO P o r bull FINE lto COARSE SAND aOiCKFILL CQ O e a i l s ID CO 7 u P J i - r e f i o gtshy
-BOREHOLE cc lt Pop OP ROCK 7^2 s
6 PAL CO 76 Z
782 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 9 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
33J BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN S i l jReyroAjrpound pet-ter- SpoundAL ^ 2ycr2e^c^__yoz_7i
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING T P A P L
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 8 2 y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
Thgr ltp7 ^
bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3
FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7
PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP
GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^
WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P
GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs
UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H
2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y
r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7
Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ
t tr ^ A bull T X V pound
yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO
980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE
lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L
CO 3
m^ j m j
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B
BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7
PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT
K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc
WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE
CO
O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I
L3
LU f o r O e - h a i l s O
if CC
YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt
dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer
CO SfAplusmn37o
J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN
3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z
S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7
PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X
GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co
WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY
o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06
PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P
CO z o p yio
H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3
111
t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt
S ^ A L 3 CO yo
230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)
OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0
GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7
PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R
GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)
l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo
TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s
Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO
O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito
H Q
rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ ^^7ropxpP
p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt
s CO 67
M TOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
lt
CO z o p 3
i j j
a r) CO CQ Z) CO
gtbull a lt 2
CO
DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V
PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp
WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^
REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA
lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^
p p e - 72^
SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L
786
206
BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^
TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn
Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri
T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^
CGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL
-BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC
7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2
DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX
GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7
p d P OP Floe^
CO
O Ishy5 2 0 shy
bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
CJ
UJ
t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T
5poundAt^ 29 q
3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC
WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ
DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c
60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^
REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound
g o DEPTH
ELEVATION
_ pound GROUND SURFICE
I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC
CONCRETE(TYPICALLY
SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)
73PPFOAXrp SEAL
SloL 70
bull bull bull
I bullPROTE
TYPE
ECTIVE CASING bdquo
CO
o
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
C_)
LJ
t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
t l 2S2 O
gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302
322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2
P-^^ nP I ^
WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^
DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72
PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J
GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o
WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
o - t P V C i r o m
f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE Sree^L y x
V
CO
o 70
1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL
bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO
u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO
100
Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
NOTE NOT TO SCALt
vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC
y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19
Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i
ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^
Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O
SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L
CO
o
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
u UJ
t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r
S P A L
CO 3
3 ^
361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)
s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P
S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Jvj-iw-fili
IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A
EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N
^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull
^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^
CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA
Prepared for the
RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
OCTOBER 1981
CE MAGUIRE INC
PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND
Architects bull Engineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI
October 5 1981 CEM 3869
Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903
Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill
Dear Mr Delfino
In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area
The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects
Very truly yours
CE MAGUIRE INC
Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager
Enclosure
CMPdw
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK
3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX
TABLE NO TITLE
HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
FIGURE NO TITLE
1 LOCATION MAP
2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
FINAL GRADING PLAN
PAGE
1
5
9
PAGE
6
8
PAGE
2
11
DRAWING NO
1
2
3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
WELL N a r y i f ^ - ^ 4 BORING Wo 7J7E2 FILE No C - 3 0 0 Z t t ^ DATE raquoMlaquoTAiiFn ^ - r - ^ - f 6 - P 7
PROJECT C g n f r d I k lt ^ r d - f t l f ^ p S LOCATION
GZA ENGINEER ^ ^ y G u m z n e l y y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A O ^ i i i i n Q XL DS^ WEATHER CONDITIONS C g ^ ^ ^ 8 o S HRII FR X gt ^ tn J ^ P e i r r y REMARKS ALL AAf^ASURrvXeAZPS Ay(P POM P O P O P ( P U A P O y^J7PB
bullGROUND SURFACE
Dejcih -i-o op o f CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL
P V C - O J e A - y i o s h (TYPICALLY 05 THICK)
U^ell Q^posh PROTECrriVE CASING ^ TVPP ^ I T E E L S X H S 6 g ^ f o y i ^ 4rr ^ y ^ r e
p y CO
S e a cuf y4gt 7ltir t7
E 1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
6 y t f ^ ^ a ^00 ^ o UJ y^O 3 47^i7S a bull if 7^ ir o lt SSA7ro 7srz^
CO CpoundMe^ZT bull glMS tQ COARSE SAND BACKF1UU CQ
GlRouT
Q a p p iTo)( traquo^4 y r 7 y
bullBOREHOLE P 6 7
QpoundArrozrr^ Z3 7gt^LL e r CO II
67 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I-12SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (001 SLDTS)
77 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCMX
jpMym
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING J ^ A P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT _ ^ i Z l
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
i^Z^ WELL N a ^ ^ ^ r V ^ BORING Ho AlpoundAl lA-FILE No C-^ltgt(^7-7^ DATE INSTALLED 8 S 8 7 - ^ lt S - 8 7
PROJECT Cezii^c^ l L ^ ^ o 7 A 7 P P ^ S LOCATION John^-f^on 1 PXshyGZA FNfiiMFFR Po S o t raquo ^ e r y C0NTR5CT0R GZA 0^77^^ nc WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl^lt^Y^ S ^ DRILLER - Pe i - f ^y shyZ^yai^CREMARKS bull
QO DEPTH C GROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
-PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE j
CO
o Q
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE oo LJ I a- 7 t 5 e e P a ^ e I cr CO P o r bull FINE lto COARSE SAND aOiCKFILL CQ O e a i l s ID CO 7 u P J i - r e f i o gtshy
-BOREHOLE cc lt Pop OP ROCK 7^2 s
6 PAL CO 76 Z
782 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 9 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
33J BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN S i l jReyroAjrpound pet-ter- SpoundAL ^ 2ycr2e^c^__yoz_7i
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING T P A P L
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 8 2 y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
Thgr ltp7 ^
bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3
FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7
PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP
GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^
WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P
GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs
UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H
2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y
r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7
Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ
t tr ^ A bull T X V pound
yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO
980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE
lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L
CO 3
m^ j m j
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B
BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7
PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT
K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc
WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE
CO
O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I
L3
LU f o r O e - h a i l s O
if CC
YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt
dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer
CO SfAplusmn37o
J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN
3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z
S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7
PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X
GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co
WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY
o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06
PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P
CO z o p yio
H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3
111
t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt
S ^ A L 3 CO yo
230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)
OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0
GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7
PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R
GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)
l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo
TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s
Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO
O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito
H Q
rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ ^^7ropxpP
p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt
s CO 67
M TOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
lt
CO z o p 3
i j j
a r) CO CQ Z) CO
gtbull a lt 2
CO
DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V
PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp
WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^
REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA
lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^
p p e - 72^
SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L
786
206
BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^
TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn
Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri
T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^
CGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL
-BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC
7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2
DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX
GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7
p d P OP Floe^
CO
O Ishy5 2 0 shy
bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
CJ
UJ
t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T
5poundAt^ 29 q
3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC
WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ
DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c
60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^
REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound
g o DEPTH
ELEVATION
_ pound GROUND SURFICE
I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC
CONCRETE(TYPICALLY
SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)
73PPFOAXrp SEAL
SloL 70
bull bull bull
I bullPROTE
TYPE
ECTIVE CASING bdquo
CO
o
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
C_)
LJ
t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
t l 2S2 O
gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302
322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2
P-^^ nP I ^
WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^
DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72
PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J
GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o
WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
o - t P V C i r o m
f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE Sree^L y x
V
CO
o 70
1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL
bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO
u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO
100
Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
NOTE NOT TO SCALt
vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC
y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19
Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i
ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^
Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O
SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L
CO
o
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
u UJ
t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r
S P A L
CO 3
3 ^
361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)
s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P
S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Jvj-iw-fili
IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A
EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N
^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull
^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^
CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA
Prepared for the
RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
OCTOBER 1981
CE MAGUIRE INC
PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND
Architects bull Engineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI
October 5 1981 CEM 3869
Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903
Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill
Dear Mr Delfino
In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area
The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects
Very truly yours
CE MAGUIRE INC
Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager
Enclosure
CMPdw
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK
3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX
TABLE NO TITLE
HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
FIGURE NO TITLE
1 LOCATION MAP
2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
FINAL GRADING PLAN
PAGE
1
5
9
PAGE
6
8
PAGE
2
11
DRAWING NO
1
2
3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
i^Z^ WELL N a ^ ^ ^ r V ^ BORING Ho AlpoundAl lA-FILE No C-^ltgt(^7-7^ DATE INSTALLED 8 S 8 7 - ^ lt S - 8 7
PROJECT Cezii^c^ l L ^ ^ o 7 A 7 P P ^ S LOCATION John^-f^on 1 PXshyGZA FNfiiMFFR Po S o t raquo ^ e r y C0NTR5CT0R GZA 0^77^^ nc WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl^lt^Y^ S ^ DRILLER - Pe i - f ^y shyZ^yai^CREMARKS bull
QO DEPTH C GROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
-PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE j
CO
o Q
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE oo LJ I a- 7 t 5 e e P a ^ e I cr CO P o r bull FINE lto COARSE SAND aOiCKFILL CQ O e a i l s ID CO 7 u P J i - r e f i o gtshy
-BOREHOLE cc lt Pop OP ROCK 7^2 s
6 PAL CO 76 Z
782 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 9 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
33J BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN S i l jReyroAjrpound pet-ter- SpoundAL ^ 2ycr2e^c^__yoz_7i
bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING T P A P L
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 8 2 y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
Thgr ltp7 ^
bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3
FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7
PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP
GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^
WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P
GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs
UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H
2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y
r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7
Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ
t tr ^ A bull T X V pound
yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO
980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE
lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L
CO 3
m^ j m j
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B
BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7
PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT
K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc
WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE
CO
O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I
L3
LU f o r O e - h a i l s O
if CC
YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt
dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer
CO SfAplusmn37o
J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN
3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z
S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7
PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X
GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co
WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY
o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06
PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P
CO z o p yio
H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3
111
t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt
S ^ A L 3 CO yo
230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)
OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0
GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7
PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R
GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)
l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo
TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s
Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO
O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito
H Q
rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ ^^7ropxpP
p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt
s CO 67
M TOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
lt
CO z o p 3
i j j
a r) CO CQ Z) CO
gtbull a lt 2
CO
DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V
PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp
WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^
REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA
lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^
p p e - 72^
SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L
786
206
BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^
TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn
Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri
T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^
CGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL
-BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC
7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2
DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX
GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7
p d P OP Floe^
CO
O Ishy5 2 0 shy
bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
CJ
UJ
t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T
5poundAt^ 29 q
3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC
WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ
DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c
60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^
REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound
g o DEPTH
ELEVATION
_ pound GROUND SURFICE
I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC
CONCRETE(TYPICALLY
SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)
73PPFOAXrp SEAL
SloL 70
bull bull bull
I bullPROTE
TYPE
ECTIVE CASING bdquo
CO
o
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
C_)
LJ
t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
t l 2S2 O
gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302
322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2
P-^^ nP I ^
WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^
DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72
PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J
GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o
WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
o - t P V C i r o m
f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE Sree^L y x
V
CO
o 70
1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL
bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO
u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO
100
Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
NOTE NOT TO SCALt
vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC
y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19
Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i
ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^
Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O
SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L
CO
o
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
u UJ
t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r
S P A L
CO 3
3 ^
361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)
s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P
S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Jvj-iw-fili
IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A
EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N
^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull
^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^
CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA
Prepared for the
RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
OCTOBER 1981
CE MAGUIRE INC
PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND
Architects bull Engineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI
October 5 1981 CEM 3869
Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903
Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill
Dear Mr Delfino
In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area
The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects
Very truly yours
CE MAGUIRE INC
Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager
Enclosure
CMPdw
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK
3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX
TABLE NO TITLE
HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
FIGURE NO TITLE
1 LOCATION MAP
2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
FINAL GRADING PLAN
PAGE
1
5
9
PAGE
6
8
PAGE
2
11
DRAWING NO
1
2
3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
Thgr ltp7 ^
bulla WELL Na U ) B 8 7 3 A BORING No W P R 7 3
FILE No CrltiQlty72 DATE INSTALLED 8 ~ 7 8 7
PROJECT Cdr^ i ^ n l U r t d l t ( l S ^ ^ ^ LOCATION J o h n f i - f o n P TP
GZA ENGtNFFR P ^ S^i)rr^ ryi p r l y CONTRACTOR ( ^ ^ A D r i l l t p Q TZTinc ^
WEATHER mKinmnM^ C l i f a r ^ 9 0 s DRILLER v - ^ 7 f P r y y REMARKS A L L sAEASUPSAPAZTS A P e n ^ O M T c P O P G O A R D P X P j P
GO DEPTH ^ J-GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
O e p H t 7o ^CjO ofi CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PVC - UJell A - P l u s h BEiyrvAOTTs
UJell iS -Posh pel L er- PROTECTIVE CASING SGAL TYPE S T E t L P ^ H
2 UJel l B uJltiS d l e f g l a p e c b y
r e r y i o z a l o 7 P o a Yo 7 P O M CO o o f i ^ o 7 u J n ^ e r 6e f - t ^^ n z ^ o - 8 7 cnof - sect 7
Q S IX)ell 6 y fltr lt7e o l a p p r o ^ a r y bull1-12 SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
9^riZ)_ tyur iY i jy y f ^ f o p r y i f m UJ
t tr ^ A bull T X V pound
yi CO bullFINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ ID CO
980 a J3eA^TOZITE BOREHOLE
lt P i E L L e - r S ^ A L
CO 3
m^ j m j
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
yj2^i_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
76^ 9 bullBCTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - L pound A d
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 2 J z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B
BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7
PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT
K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc
WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE
CO
O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I
L3
LU f o r O e - h a i l s O
if CC
YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt
dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer
CO SfAplusmn37o
J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN
3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z
S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7
PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X
GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co
WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY
o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06
PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P
CO z o p yio
H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3
111
t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt
S ^ A L 3 CO yo
230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)
OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0
GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7
PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R
GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)
l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo
TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s
Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO
O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito
H Q
rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ ^^7ropxpP
p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt
s CO 67
M TOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
lt
CO z o p 3
i j j
a r) CO CQ Z) CO
gtbull a lt 2
CO
DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V
PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp
WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^
REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA
lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^
p p e - 72^
SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L
786
206
BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^
TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn
Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri
T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^
CGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL
-BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC
7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2
DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX
GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7
p d P OP Floe^
CO
O Ishy5 2 0 shy
bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
CJ
UJ
t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T
5poundAt^ 29 q
3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC
WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ
DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c
60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^
REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound
g o DEPTH
ELEVATION
_ pound GROUND SURFICE
I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC
CONCRETE(TYPICALLY
SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)
73PPFOAXrp SEAL
SloL 70
bull bull bull
I bullPROTE
TYPE
ECTIVE CASING bdquo
CO
o
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
C_)
LJ
t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
t l 2S2 O
gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302
322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2
P-^^ nP I ^
WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^
DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72
PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J
GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o
WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
o - t P V C i r o m
f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE Sree^L y x
V
CO
o 70
1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL
bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO
u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO
100
Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
NOTE NOT TO SCALt
vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC
y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19
Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i
ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^
Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O
SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L
CO
o
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
u UJ
t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r
S P A L
CO 3
3 ^
361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)
s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P
S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Jvj-iw-fili
IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A
EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N
^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull
^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^
CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA
Prepared for the
RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
OCTOBER 1981
CE MAGUIRE INC
PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND
Architects bull Engineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI
October 5 1981 CEM 3869
Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903
Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill
Dear Mr Delfino
In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area
The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects
Very truly yours
CE MAGUIRE INC
Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager
Enclosure
CMPdw
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK
3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX
TABLE NO TITLE
HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
FIGURE NO TITLE
1 LOCATION MAP
2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
FINAL GRADING PLAN
PAGE
1
5
9
PAGE
6
8
PAGE
2
11
DRAWING NO
1
2
3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
lta^^^ 2 O-P2 rT3 WELL Na (Pf73B
BORING No lJ[7poundR7d FILE Na lt - 3 lt ( ^ 7 Y 2 DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 y 8 7
PROiFPT Cen- f t ra l L a n d f i I I l ^ P 5 i nrATinrj ifoh mso n PTT
K7AFNR1NFFR P o l S O nn y^ e l r l y CONTRACTOR ft A QrH^^ Xmc
WEATHER CONDITIONS C llt2^ r i 9 Q S DRILLER P r ^ ^ 7 P ^ S r ^ y REMARKS A L L AZlEASUZ^MeAZTS A Zi iB ^ ^ O A A T a P a - (SUA P O P J r ^ ^ shy
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE
CO
O Ujell POI ^-i-E A o i i i z l
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE Q See P a o c I
L3
LU f o r O e - h a i l s O
if CC
YATTVP CO FINE 10 COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
u o gt tr BOREHOLE lt
dBPToyrre T o p O p ROCK 3 P 9 PeLuer
CO SfAplusmn37o
J316 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull ) - V 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
ISO lylTlO WELLBOTTOM OF SCREEN
3poundzrozjrTS Ppound i- L g r 3poundA Z
S2 F2iUrs_c^ns(_ y6gp__ ^ BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ ^ 9
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J S L l A y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7
PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X
GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co
WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY
o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06
PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P
CO z o p yio
H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3
111
t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt
S ^ A L 3 CO yo
230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)
OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0
GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7
PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R
GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)
l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo
TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s
Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO
O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito
H Q
rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ ^^7ropxpP
p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt
s CO 67
M TOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
lt
CO z o p 3
i j j
a r) CO CQ Z) CO
gtbull a lt 2
CO
DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V
PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp
WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^
REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA
lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^
p p e - 72^
SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L
786
206
BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^
TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn
Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri
T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^
CGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL
-BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC
7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2
DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX
GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7
p d P OP Floe^
CO
O Ishy5 2 0 shy
bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
CJ
UJ
t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T
5poundAt^ 29 q
3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC
WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ
DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c
60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^
REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound
g o DEPTH
ELEVATION
_ pound GROUND SURFICE
I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC
CONCRETE(TYPICALLY
SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)
73PPFOAXrp SEAL
SloL 70
bull bull bull
I bullPROTE
TYPE
ECTIVE CASING bdquo
CO
o
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
C_)
LJ
t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
t l 2S2 O
gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302
322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2
P-^^ nP I ^
WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^
DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72
PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J
GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o
WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
o - t P V C i r o m
f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE Sree^L y x
V
CO
o 70
1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL
bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO
u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO
100
Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
NOTE NOT TO SCALt
vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC
y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19
Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i
ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^
Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O
SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L
CO
o
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
u UJ
t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r
S P A L
CO 3
3 ^
361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)
s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P
S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Jvj-iw-fili
IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A
EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N
^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull
^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^
CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA
Prepared for the
RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
OCTOBER 1981
CE MAGUIRE INC
PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND
Architects bull Engineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI
October 5 1981 CEM 3869
Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903
Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill
Dear Mr Delfino
In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area
The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects
Very truly yours
CE MAGUIRE INC
Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager
Enclosure
CMPdw
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK
3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX
TABLE NO TITLE
HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
FIGURE NO TITLE
1 LOCATION MAP
2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
FINAL GRADING PLAN
PAGE
1
5
9
PAGE
6
8
PAGE
2
11
DRAWING NO
1
2
3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
r ^ WELLNa ( J ^ ^ V p P I BORING No L7pound87 Y (il I i FILE Na Q-3QC77- 7 DATE INSTALLED 8 7 8 7
PRniFnT C e n i r - a f L a n c A I P^ i ^S i nrATifgti TnhnS f o n P X
GZA ENGINEER A A i h G S i h e r r l 1 mMTRATrnR G u r o f O n l y i Q Co
WEATHER CONDITIONS (Tgtf Ty 8 C ^ npii i FR P a u l PgtreuroSCia REMARKS ALL A1PA6UPAAPAYr6 A P P z^PoAA PoP 0=^ GUAf^D P j r P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL i Dep l -h I-o o p 05 THCK) (TYPICALLY
o f P V C rozr cjUdv-d p i p e = 06
PROTECTIVE CASING TYPE S T pound pound L ^ X P
CO z o p yio
H ^ SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE 3
111
t cr p A r i y p Z) FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
o gt- rvPoi-PocK n o 3 ^ 7 r o A p r P Q BOREHOLE P P l - L ^ P lt
S ^ A L 3 CO yo
230 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 I V a S C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLDTS)
OO d9yi BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
^ ^ mizm bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALX
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING y9o DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 9 - 0
GOLDBERQ-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7
PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R
GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)
l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo
TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s
Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO
O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito
H Q
rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ ^^7ropxpP
p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt
s CO 67
M TOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
lt
CO z o p 3
i j j
a r) CO CQ Z) CO
gtbull a lt 2
CO
DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V
PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp
WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^
REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA
lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^
p p e - 72^
SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L
786
206
BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^
TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn
Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri
T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^
CGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL
-BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC
7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2
DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX
GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7
p d P OP Floe^
CO
O Ishy5 2 0 shy
bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
CJ
UJ
t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T
5poundAt^ 29 q
3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC
WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ
DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c
60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^
REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound
g o DEPTH
ELEVATION
_ pound GROUND SURFICE
I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC
CONCRETE(TYPICALLY
SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)
73PPFOAXrp SEAL
SloL 70
bull bull bull
I bullPROTE
TYPE
ECTIVE CASING bdquo
CO
o
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
C_)
LJ
t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
t l 2S2 O
gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302
322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2
P-^^ nP I ^
WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^
DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72
PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J
GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o
WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
o - t P V C i r o m
f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE Sree^L y x
V
CO
o 70
1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL
bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO
u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO
100
Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
NOTE NOT TO SCALt
vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC
y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19
Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i
ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^
Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O
SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L
CO
o
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
u UJ
t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r
S P A L
CO 3
3 ^
361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)
s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P
S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Jvj-iw-fili
IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A
EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N
^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull
^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^
CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA
Prepared for the
RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
OCTOBER 1981
CE MAGUIRE INC
PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND
Architects bull Engineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI
October 5 1981 CEM 3869
Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903
Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill
Dear Mr Delfino
In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area
The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects
Very truly yours
CE MAGUIRE INC
Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager
Enclosure
CMPdw
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK
3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX
TABLE NO TITLE
HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
FIGURE NO TITLE
1 LOCATION MAP
2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
FINAL GRADING PLAN
PAGE
1
5
9
PAGE
6
8
PAGE
2
11
DRAWING NO
1
2
3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
I of I WELL Na ( U P 8 7 8 BORING Na UJFS7-8 FILE No C-30lt27shyDATE INSTALLED - H - 8 7
PRO JFCT C e t l f y g I L a n c f i R X F Q nrATinM Join tnz^l-a n R
GZA ENGINEER 77ltrhc r t B c h u x mMTRArrnp G m c P ) r 7 7 n o Ca WEATHER rfiMniTinMg C e a r - Ro s npii i FR P a o Bt-c^c7a REMARKS ALL ZyiPASCAASZTS A R P ^Pz)AA -J^ao n - Z pound Z A R D P X P P
bullGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 0 5 THCK)
l C f r o y y t a u a r ^ y p i p e =bull Oi PROTECrriVE CASING bdquo
TYPE ^ pound t ^ L ltPP X yen 7 G o a r c 7 p I p e uJ a s
Shor-hez i ec a iy ]y CO
O Ceyyy e h - f ea Tito
H Q
rocK S J^ f i ^ c ^ yo bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
O
UJ ^^7ropxpP
p^LLpr t a 6^Al Zi bullFIME to (X)AR8E SAND- BACKRLL CO CQ Z3 CO u o gtshyor bullBOREHOLE lt
s CO 67
M TOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull M a X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING N O T E NOT TO SCALS
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING - I L P l
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT 8 7 z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO A ASSOCIATES INC
lt
CO z o p 3
i j j
a r) CO CQ Z) CO
gtbull a lt 2
CO
DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V
PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp
WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^
REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA
lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^
p p e - 72^
SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L
786
206
BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^
TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn
Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri
T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^
CGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL
-BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC
7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2
DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX
GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7
p d P OP Floe^
CO
O Ishy5 2 0 shy
bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
CJ
UJ
t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T
5poundAt^ 29 q
3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC
WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ
DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c
60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^
REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound
g o DEPTH
ELEVATION
_ pound GROUND SURFICE
I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC
CONCRETE(TYPICALLY
SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)
73PPFOAXrp SEAL
SloL 70
bull bull bull
I bullPROTE
TYPE
ECTIVE CASING bdquo
CO
o
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
C_)
LJ
t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
t l 2S2 O
gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302
322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2
P-^^ nP I ^
WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^
DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72
PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J
GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o
WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
o - t P V C i r o m
f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE Sree^L y x
V
CO
o 70
1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL
bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO
u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO
100
Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
NOTE NOT TO SCALt
vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC
y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19
Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i
ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^
Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O
SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L
CO
o
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
u UJ
t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r
S P A L
CO 3
3 ^
361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)
s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P
S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Jvj-iw-fili
IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A
EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N
^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull
^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^
CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA
Prepared for the
RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
OCTOBER 1981
CE MAGUIRE INC
PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND
Architects bull Engineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI
October 5 1981 CEM 3869
Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903
Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill
Dear Mr Delfino
In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area
The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects
Very truly yours
CE MAGUIRE INC
Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager
Enclosure
CMPdw
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK
3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX
TABLE NO TITLE
HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
FIGURE NO TITLE
1 LOCATION MAP
2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
FINAL GRADING PLAN
PAGE
1
5
9
PAGE
6
8
PAGE
2
11
DRAWING NO
1
2
3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
lt
CO z o p 3
i j j
a r) CO CQ Z) CO
gtbull a lt 2
CO
DATE iMlaquo^TAiiFn Q O - R V
PROJECT C s n i r a Llt^n ( pi 11 I ^ F S nrAT^G7AFWRINFER 7 V o r h e r S c i u z mMTRArrnp
WEATHER CONDITIONS Oyeirca^t^ ^os nR|M raquo^
REMARKS 71U AAPASIJPM^ZYT-S zJ^ zrpoAA
lOeph p v c Proyr^ ^
p p e - 72^
SPVPoMyp P P L L P P 6 P A L
786
206
BORING Na (UFg7lt^ FILE WoC-ltiOC^7^
TTahnRl-nn X 7^tj J P ^ 7yi^ Pn
Z=^aijBrelt^r7ri
T-no o (^CZzj n PsTP^
CGROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE S U R F laquo E SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING
20 +-4a SCHD 80 PVC RISER PIPE
bull PINE to COARSE- SAND BACKRLL
-BOREHOLE
bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bullI l g SCHD 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING i DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL PDINT 3 P 6 Z
GOLDBERG-ZOINO ft ASSOCIATES INC
7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2
DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX
GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7
p d P OP Floe^
CO
O Ishy5 2 0 shy
bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
CJ
UJ
t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T
5poundAt^ 29 q
3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC
WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ
DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c
60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^
REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound
g o DEPTH
ELEVATION
_ pound GROUND SURFICE
I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC
CONCRETE(TYPICALLY
SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)
73PPFOAXrp SEAL
SloL 70
bull bull bull
I bullPROTE
TYPE
ECTIVE CASING bdquo
CO
o
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
C_)
LJ
t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
t l 2S2 O
gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302
322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2
P-^^ nP I ^
WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^
DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72
PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J
GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o
WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
o - t P V C i r o m
f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE Sree^L y x
V
CO
o 70
1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL
bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO
u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO
100
Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
NOTE NOT TO SCALt
vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC
y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19
Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i
ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^
Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O
SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L
CO
o
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
u UJ
t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r
S P A L
CO 3
3 ^
361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)
s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P
S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Jvj-iw-fili
IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A
EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N
^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull
^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^
CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA
Prepared for the
RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
OCTOBER 1981
CE MAGUIRE INC
PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND
Architects bull Engineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI
October 5 1981 CEM 3869
Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903
Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill
Dear Mr Delfino
In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area
The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects
Very truly yours
CE MAGUIRE INC
Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager
Enclosure
CMPdw
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK
3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX
TABLE NO TITLE
HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
FIGURE NO TITLE
1 LOCATION MAP
2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
FINAL GRADING PLAN
PAGE
1
5
9
PAGE
6
8
PAGE
2
11
DRAWING NO
1
2
3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
7ltsP WELL w g y p 8 7 - BORING Na ( k P 8 7 FILE Na C - 3 0 0 2 7 2
DATE INSTALLED 8 - 2 7 - 8 7 PRniFrT C a n t r a L o n ^ P P 7 ^ y S i nrATinM J o h n e^Jo n P iX
GZA ENGINEER P y o r ^ P c r P Slt^h u l^ mrrrRArrnR C o 7 n 7 n r 7 7 y 7 n Q C o WEATHER nnNDiTinMR C l e a r ^ Va s npii i FR P a a 3 r e ^ c 7 a REMARKS A L L 7yieASUPMpound-77-Q A R P yeoAA ~ r o P OP (^UARn PJTPfF
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
PROTECTIVE CASING ^ TYPP S T i z P L 7 gt^7
p d P OP Floe^
CO
O Ishy5 2 0 shy
bull M a SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
CJ
UJ
t cc p A - r x y y p Z) v bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CO CO
u o gtshyQ bullBOREHOLE lt 2 7 9 s 2 Se^Mrovxre Z) CO P S I L B T
5poundAt^ 29 q
3o=i -TOP OF WELL SCREEN
20 - t - raquo 9 C H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC
WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
Vd9 BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
BOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING ^ 8 - 9
DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^73shy 9
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ
DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c
60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^
REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound
g o DEPTH
ELEVATION
_ pound GROUND SURFICE
I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC
CONCRETE(TYPICALLY
SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)
73PPFOAXrp SEAL
SloL 70
bull bull bull
I bullPROTE
TYPE
ECTIVE CASING bdquo
CO
o
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
C_)
LJ
t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
t l 2S2 O
gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302
322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2
P-^^ nP I ^
WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^
DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72
PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J
GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o
WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
o - t P V C i r o m
f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE Sree^L y x
V
CO
o 70
1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL
bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO
u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO
100
Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
NOTE NOT TO SCALt
vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC
y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19
Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i
ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^
Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O
SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L
CO
o
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
u UJ
t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r
S P A L
CO 3
3 ^
361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)
s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P
S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Jvj-iw-fili
IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A
EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N
^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull
^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^
CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA
Prepared for the
RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
OCTOBER 1981
CE MAGUIRE INC
PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND
Architects bull Engineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI
October 5 1981 CEM 3869
Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903
Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill
Dear Mr Delfino
In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area
The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects
Very truly yours
CE MAGUIRE INC
Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager
Enclosure
CMPdw
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK
3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX
TABLE NO TITLE
HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
FIGURE NO TITLE
1 LOCATION MAP
2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
FINAL GRADING PLAN
PAGE
1
5
9
PAGE
6
8
PAGE
2
11
DRAWING NO
1
2
3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
Pc t - I ltr I WELL Na (PPH^^S^ BORING Nn (IJPR 7-76 FILE Na C-30OZ7 IZ
DATE INSTALLED- ^-1-87 PROJECT C p m - f r a L a n d P i I I LOCATION [ f i i h n ^ f c n f IRS^shyGZA ENGINEER Pol S u y y i t y i p r y CONTRACTOR GT^A D r i l l imp ~Pgt c
60[ i -^ Z f ^ y y ^ y WEATHER mMniTinNS O ^ f r r i x f i DRILLER P ^ f f i f P ^ ^ ^
REMARKS ALL PlPASURMPAZ-rS Agtlt PPozvi -TTDP O ( U A R D P X P pound
g o DEPTH
ELEVATION
_ pound GROUND SURFICE
I Dep-th -fc -fcp o f PVC
CONCRETE(TYPICALLY
SURFACE SEAL 0 5 THCK)
73PPFOAXrp SEAL
SloL 70
bull bull bull
I bullPROTE
TYPE
ECTIVE CASING bdquo
CO
o
1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
C_)
LJ
t Ed VATTVP CO bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CQ
CO
t l 2S2 O
gt shyor SPPToAjre bullBOREHOLE lt ppi^ppp 2 2 S P A L 3 CO 302
322 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
bull I - 1 2 SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
_y4A_ BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
SePrcTr^_P_PLLPT___^^^^^ SE bullBOTTOM OF BORING NOTE NOT TO SOMJC
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING 7^87^ DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT ^ 7 3 2
P-^^ nP I ^
WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^
DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72
PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J
GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o
WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
o - t P V C i r o m
f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE Sree^L y x
V
CO
o 70
1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL
bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO
u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO
100
Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
NOTE NOT TO SCALt
vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC
y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19
Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i
ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^
Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O
SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L
CO
o
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
u UJ
t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r
S P A L
CO 3
3 ^
361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)
s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P
S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Jvj-iw-fili
IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A
EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N
^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull
^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^
CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA
Prepared for the
RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
OCTOBER 1981
CE MAGUIRE INC
PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND
Architects bull Engineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI
October 5 1981 CEM 3869
Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903
Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill
Dear Mr Delfino
In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area
The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects
Very truly yours
CE MAGUIRE INC
Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager
Enclosure
CMPdw
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK
3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX
TABLE NO TITLE
HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
FIGURE NO TITLE
1 LOCATION MAP
2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
FINAL GRADING PLAN
PAGE
1
5
9
PAGE
6
8
PAGE
2
11
DRAWING NO
1
2
3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
P-^^ nP I ^
WELL W Q a P 8 7 - 7 BORING W Q L U E B U T ^
DATE INSTALLED 8U-87 FILE Na r ^ao27 72
PROJECT C e n r a l L a m ^ i l ^ 7 ^ 6 LOCATION d o h y ^ ^ i o n J R J
GZA FNRiNFFR A o r h ^ r S c h ux CONTRACTOR C n t cJ O r 7 1 l i n o C o
WEATHER m M n m n u R C l e a ^ 7 o f i n p i i i FR P a i I R i r ^ a ZX T REMARKS A L l A A t A S U P M F A Z - r s A(e z=^PoM -ToZ^ O P (^UAZin Z gt r p
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL TDep-f-h bullbullltgt -fop (TYPICALLY 05 THCK)
o - t P V C i r o m
f u a r c PP PROTECTIVE CASING
TYPE Sree^L y x
V
CO
o 70
1-1a-SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
o LU QPAProurrp O p p i L p r cr SEAL
bullFINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO 3 CO
u o gt oc -BOREHOLE lt 2 2 3 CO
100
Il-l bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
2-o l - l a SCHQ 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (OOl SLOTS)
BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
NOTE NOT TO SCALt
vy8 -BC3TT0M OF BORING
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING STM 7 DEPTH ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT J j U d mdash Y
GOLDBERG-ZOINO laquo ASSOCIATES INC
y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19
Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i
ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^
Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O
SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L
CO
o
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
u UJ
t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r
S P A L
CO 3
3 ^
361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)
s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P
S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Jvj-iw-fili
IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A
EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N
^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull
^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^
CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA
Prepared for the
RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
OCTOBER 1981
CE MAGUIRE INC
PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND
Architects bull Engineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI
October 5 1981 CEM 3869
Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903
Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill
Dear Mr Delfino
In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area
The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects
Very truly yours
CE MAGUIRE INC
Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager
Enclosure
CMPdw
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK
3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX
TABLE NO TITLE
HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
FIGURE NO TITLE
1 LOCATION MAP
2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
FINAL GRADING PLAN
PAGE
1
5
9
PAGE
6
8
PAGE
2
11
DRAWING NO
1
2
3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
y-^^f 7 -P7 psa E^ ^^wlt^lPPltS7- 19
Pa BORING Wo(PP^7 7 m li U FILE Na ^ r 7 - ^ ^ ^ ^ - ^ DATE INSTALLED ^ i ^ - ^ f I i
ppn iF r T y ^ ^ y y ^ 7 l o ^ o y P 7 y Y t p y P S m r A T i n M P o h i ^ ^ ^ gt ^ P^ z r GZA ENGINEER ^ c P ^ c^ygtf ^ Y 7 ^ ^ y ) C CONTRACTOR ^T^ f 7 2 r 7 l - ^ J WEATHER mMniT iOMft ^ ^ y ^lt^ iJ DRILLER P z ^ - i 77 P r r r y REMARKS 21 L L ZlZIF-AiSO Y^M j tTZYPC i Z 4 i lt e Z^Z^aAZl T ^ P ^ P (Pc^A t^ jy) P ^ Y ^ z P
g o DEPTH bullGROUND SURFACE
ELEVATION
CONCRETE SURFACE SEAL (TYPICALLY 05 THCK) O^ph A Yp y p C ^
Yyo^ ^oc -e yy e = 70 PROTECTIVE CASING - bdquo TYPF S P F P U S ^ O
SPTYTaAjrrp 6 B A L
CO
o
bull1-12 SCHD 8 0 PVC RISER PIPE
u UJ
t cc NATZVe 3 FINE to COARSE SAND BACKRLL CO CQ 3 CO 281 O gt- B P ^ P T o P j r p BOREHOLE lt p p L L ^ r
S P A L
CO 3
3 ^
361 bullTOP OF WELL SCREEN
l - l 2 X H Q 8 0 SLOTTED PVC WELL SCREEN (COl SLOTS)
s BOTTOM OF WELL SCREEN
poundP77poAp r rp P P L L ^ P
S B A l SI8 bullBOTTOM OF BORING
NOTE NOT TO SCALE
DEPTHELEVATION BOTTOM OF BORING SL3 7 D E P T H ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WELL POINT j 7 S _ y _
GOLDBERG-ZOINO amp ASSOCIATES INC
Jvj-iw-fili
IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A
EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N
^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull
^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^
CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA
Prepared for the
RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
OCTOBER 1981
CE MAGUIRE INC
PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND
Architects bull Engineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI
October 5 1981 CEM 3869
Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903
Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill
Dear Mr Delfino
In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area
The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects
Very truly yours
CE MAGUIRE INC
Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager
Enclosure
CMPdw
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK
3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX
TABLE NO TITLE
HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
FIGURE NO TITLE
1 LOCATION MAP
2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
FINAL GRADING PLAN
PAGE
1
5
9
PAGE
6
8
PAGE
2
11
DRAWING NO
1
2
3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
Jvj-iw-fili
IffiSamiMSOT f A RE A
EiEiiiiEii^i^AMDiso LI D-fW A s T E bullW B S reg ^ ( I E ME MEiCO R PO R A TIO N
^ ^ i ^ i ^ t i f bull^-i^^r-i--^-i bull bull bullbullVrtivr f-- ^gt - bull
^^P^rc|^itefits||E ngi ne e rsV^ Planner s yyy^^yy 1^ v praquoBi^iQMi^ence^SRho^
CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA
Prepared for the
RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
OCTOBER 1981
CE MAGUIRE INC
PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND
Architects bull Engineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI
October 5 1981 CEM 3869
Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903
Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill
Dear Mr Delfino
In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area
The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects
Very truly yours
CE MAGUIRE INC
Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager
Enclosure
CMPdw
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK
3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX
TABLE NO TITLE
HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
FIGURE NO TITLE
1 LOCATION MAP
2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
FINAL GRADING PLAN
PAGE
1
5
9
PAGE
6
8
PAGE
2
11
DRAWING NO
1
2
3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
CLOSING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
RHODE ISLAND CENTRAL LANDFILL
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA
Prepared for the
RHODE ISLAND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
OCTOBER 1981
CE MAGUIRE INC
PROVIDENCE RHODE ISLAND
Architects bull Engineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI
October 5 1981 CEM 3869
Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903
Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill
Dear Mr Delfino
In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area
The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects
Very truly yours
CE MAGUIRE INC
Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager
Enclosure
CMPdw
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK
3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX
TABLE NO TITLE
HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
FIGURE NO TITLE
1 LOCATION MAP
2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
FINAL GRADING PLAN
PAGE
1
5
9
PAGE
6
8
PAGE
2
11
DRAWING NO
1
2
3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
Architects bull Engineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC 31 Canal Street Providence Rhode Island 02903 Tel 401 272-6000 Telex 92-7533 Cable CEMI
October 5 1981 CEM 3869
Mr Ronald Delfino Director of Operations and Planning RI Solid Waste Management Corporation 39 Pike Street Providence RI 02903
Re Closing of Hazardous Waste Disposal Area at Central Landfill
Dear Mr Delfino
In accordance with Mr Louis Davids letters of authorization dated April 16 1981 and August 27 1981 we are pleased to submit our report and plans enshytitled Closing Plans and Specifications for Rhode Island Central Landfill Hazardous Waste Area
The report presents the monitoring well network the procedures for closing the facility and the estimated costs for closing and monitoring the disposal area The accompanying plans present the hydrogeological information final grading and details required for the closing
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation and hope to work closely with you again on future projects
Very truly yours
CE MAGUIRE INC
Cheryl M Palesh PE Project Manager
Enclosure
CMPdw
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK
3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX
TABLE NO TITLE
HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
FIGURE NO TITLE
1 LOCATION MAP
2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
FINAL GRADING PLAN
PAGE
1
5
9
PAGE
6
8
PAGE
2
11
DRAWING NO
1
2
3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 MONITORING WELL NETWORK
3 CLOSING PROGRAM amp COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX
TABLE NO TITLE
HAZAROUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELLS DETAILS
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
FIGURE NO TITLE
1 LOCATION MAP
2 DRAINAGE AND LINER PLACEMENT DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
BEDROCK AND GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
FINAL GRADING PLAN
PAGE
1
5
9
PAGE
6
8
PAGE
2
11
DRAWING NO
1
2
3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
On April 16 1981 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation (RISWMC) to prepare closing plans and specifications for the inactive hazardous waste disposal area at the RISWMC Central Landfill The location of this area relative to the landfill areas and water sheds is shown in Figure 1 also shown is the approximate property line boundary for Corporation owned land The plans and specifications prepared are in accordance with the State Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Hazardous Waste Manageshyment Facility Operating Permit Rules and Regulations - Landfills Rule 24 Closure Additionally some of the items presented are in accordance with discussions held at an on-site meeting with DEM RISWMC and CE Maguire staff on 16 March 1981
The topographic map presented was compiled from maps completed in May 1979 and a survey completed by Weiler Mapping Inc 31 July 1981 The 1979 mapping was done by photogrammetric methods using stereo aerial photography performed 2 February 1979 Spot elevations were taken around the hazardous waste area and the existing contours were drawn in accordingly This map is presented as Drawing No 1 in the set of drawings which accompanies this report
Bedrock and ground water contours were developed from data compiled for the landfill expansion study conducted between February and May 1979 and three additional borings J K L installed in August 1981 These data were augmented with water level readings from monishytoring wells installed in 1976 as part of the original landfill design and development study Drawing No 2 shows the revised bedrock and ground waters contours for the hazardous waste area
The following section contains a summary of the available information regarding the operation of the hazardous waste disposal area The purpose of this summary is to present the history of the area from its installation in October 1976 to the time it was given an inactive status in September 1979
Summary of Facility Operation
In May 1976 CE Maguire Inc was retained by the previous landfill owner to prepare a report on design and development of the sanitary landfill operation The Operation Manual section of this report preshysented the description of working procedures for the special waste area as follows
Special wastes include septic waste liquids from household septic tanks sewage sludge cheraical waste and hazardous waste The area is composed of a series of shallow trenches where all waste will be deposited The liquid fraction of the waste shall be allowed to percolate into the underlying soil
-1shy
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
bull ^bull bullbullrihTyya--y^-^ ^^ bull-y ^ bull c ^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ y y ^
j ^z - bullyyy^c^y -^y^P- A ^^ bullbull^bullbullhyy~-lt7^7fr--^fpyjy^ - P
yy7M^-r0l^ ^ )rVr^^M^ V- Jipound ^ I f f i j ^ ^ ^ yy ] f^^ypound^
py ymyzY bull bull ^ ^ p Z- ltzr bull -^bullbullbullbull(y^y
FIGURE NOJ_^
-bull^^o
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
strata The remaining solids shall be stockpiled within the area and covered daily with daily cover material When voids in the soil within the trenches become filled with solids so that the [liquid waste] percolation rate is negligible then those trenches whall be no longer used and covered with final cover raaterial
Design drawings accompanying the report showed the special waste area to consist of nine trenches having a depth of 6 to 7 feet During the March 16 1981 on-site meeting it was agreed that only three of these trenches were used for hazardous waste disposal The total area encompassed by these three trenches is approximately 15500 sq ft or 0356 acres
Manifest records of the materials placed in the hazardous waste disshyposal area were not maintained by the DEM prior to June 1978 As such there are no records of the type or quantity of materials acshycepted for disposal between May 1976 and then The available records indicate that approximately 200000 gal per month were received in the winter spring and early summer months and 100000 gal per month the remainder of the year Based on these approximate quantities and the above described operation procedure it is assumed that the trenches were emptied every 4 to 6 months
The records also indicated that starting in 1979 only liraited volumes of liquid wastes were accepted The nature of the waste material accepted was 75 to 95 percent solids in this final year versus 75 to 95 liquid in the previous year This being the case the material currently in the trenches are assumed to be the liquid wastes disposed of between May and September 1979 along with rainfall and snow melt
The facility was given an inactive status in September 1979 as per the September 13 1979 letter from the DEM Director to agents of Mr Silvestri As such no hazardous wastes have been accepted at the facility since that time
Additional data retained on the manifest records include waste desshycription number and type of containers amount form pH composition (percent by volume or weight) waste hauler and waste generator For the most part the waste description was of a general nature for example wire drawing solution vinyl plastics rinse waste paint etc In some cases a laboratory analysis was attached to manifest indicating the various components and percentages of each present in the material
Also included on the record was the waste category based on the DEM classification systera In accordance with this system the waste was classified as toxic (ability to cause genetic harra) reactive flamshymable corrosive (low or high pH) or infectious Based on the manishyfest records all categories of waste materials were accepted for disposal at the facility between June 1978 and September 1979
In conclusion the review of available reports and records gives a very limited idea of the quantities and types of wastes remaining in
-3shy
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
the hazardous waste disposal area Based on a 7 foot dpeth the approximate waste volume is 4000 cu yd or 800000 gal The comshyposition or hazardousness of the wastes is indeterminable without further study and laboratory analyses
-4shy
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
SECTION 2
MONITORING WELL NETWORK
A ground water monitoring program is currently in effect for the sanitary landfill operation which was prepared in May 1980 Eight monitoring wells are included in this program one up-gradient of the general ground water direction the others down-gradient The program currently prescribes sampling during the months of October February and June This schedule is to be amended such that samples are colshylected four times a year
Collected samples are analyzed for specific conductance pH chloride (Cl) iron (Fe) total organic carbon (TOC) and the heavy metals listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Iterium Primary Drinking Water Standards The initial sampling was conducted in October 1980 the results of which are on file at the RISWMC and DEM
In developing the bedrock and ground water contour map for the area it was determined that ground water in the general area of the hazardous waste site flows through cracks and fissures within the bedrock As such the additional sampling program to be conducted for monitoring of the hazardous waste area consists of seven wells Three of these are monitoring wells which were installed for ground water quality monitoring in the sludge disposal area these wells are Nos E F and G (formerly refered to as BH-28 29 and 30 respectively) These wells are east of the hazardous waste disposal area Three new wells have been installed southsouthwest of the area and a fourth new well has been installed up-gradient of the hazardous waste disposal area along Central Pike The location of all wells is shown in the attached drawings boring logs are presented in Appendix A Details on these wells are presented in Table 1
The description of well construction and sample withdrawal procedures for all wells are presented in the existing ground water monitoring program
It is proposed that samples collected from the hazardous waste area monitoring wells be analysed for the same parameters specified in the existing program The total organic carbon analysis will be used to assess organic chemical pollution Should a high value result from the analyses additional parameters will be defined for laboratory testing In order to differentiate between leachate contamination and metal concentrations present naturally in the soil analyses will be conducted on both filtered and unfiltered samples
s Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Selenium (Se) Barium (Ba) Chromiura (Cr) Mercury (Hg) Silver (Ag)
Analytical water quality results will be compiled and analyzed by inspection Should a noticeable difference be observed in ground water quality data from the wells an expanded testing program will be
-5shy
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
TABLE 1
HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA MONITORING WELL DETAILS
Well Number
E
F
I G
J
K
L
M
Surface Elevation
38965
38208
39767
36245
38205
38008
3913
Top Pipe Elevation
39263
38458
39997
36516
38471
38203
39205
Bedrock Elevation
3866
3740
3797
3464
3528
3526
3745
Well Depth (Feet)
250
250
275
225
345
349
235
Water Elevation Taken 9981
37805
36987
37147
35015
NA
35376
37955
Remarks
sealed 358-2 installed 82580
sealed 3729 installed 82280
sealed 3698 installed 82880
sealed Q 34845 installed 82681
sealed 35755 installed 82081
sealed 35458 installed 81881
sealed (sect 378-3 installed 83180
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
undertaken Four replicate samples would be collected from each of the wells The analytical parameters will be those subject to question from the initial analyses The analytical results from the replicate samples will be statistically analyzed using the mean values from a set of samples testing for a significant difference between water quality results Significant differences will be assessed using a single-tailed Students t-test at the 001 level of confidence
The proposed sample collection schedule for the five hazardous waste disposal area wells is presented in Table 2 It is recommended that the parameters analyzed for in years 2 3 and 4 be redefined on the basis of the initial year data This recommendation is raade on the basis of cost considerations for the requisite laboratory work and the limited usefulness of values that are reported in less than conshycentrations
Based on the anticipated area closing schedule the first set of samples would be collected in September 1981 Year 1 would thus be from this time to June 1982 with the sampling continued on this basis until the end of the 30 year post-closure period Use of the 30 year period is based on EPA requirements issued under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
-7shy
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SCHEDULE
TIME PERIOD FREQUENCY ANALYSES
Year 1 Sept Dec Mar June pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag and Volatile Organics
Year 2 to 3 Oct Feb June Dec pH Cl Fe TOC specific conductance As Ba Cd Cr Pb Hg Se Ag
-8shy
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
SECTION 3
CLOSING PROGRAM AND COST ESTIMATES
Closure Program
The general closure concept for the hazardous waste site will be to properly fill compact and grade the site area followed by placement of cover material which will minimize rainfall and snow melt pershycolation into the underlying wastes Detailed descriptions of the steps to be undertaken in closure of the site are as follows
1 Area FillThe hazardous waste trench is to be filled with a course sand and gravel mixture until it can support a compaction vehicle
2 Compaction Upon filling of the area as prescribed above the in-place material is to be compacted by no less than two (2) passes of a sheeps-foot compactor or equivalent equipment
3 Grading After compaction of the in-place fill a homoshygenous soil mixture eg sandy-silt is to be placed over the entire site area and compacted This soil is to be mounded graded and compacted such that a 5 slope is achieved The depth of soil over the in-place fill will approximate 2-12 to 3 feet
4 Drainage A drainage channel is to be constructed around the perimeter of the mounded areas The channel is to be constructed such that a minimum of a 2 bottom slope is maintained to assure continuous flow of collected runoff within the channels along each side of the mounded area Collected runoff will be chanshyneled for discharge to the undisturbed area away from the landshyfill and sludge disposal area
5 Liner A 15 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane liner will be placed over the mounded area The PVC sheeting will be fabricated into the minimum number of large panels required to fit the job site The ends of liner sheets will be anchored in the soil approxiraately one foot from the outside wall of the drainage channel The PVC sheet will then be layed along the sides and bottom of the drainage channel and pulled up over the mounded area The liner will be further anchored by careful placement of bank run gravel in the drainage channel such that puncturing or tearing of the liner sheet does not occur The liner is scheduled to be installed the week of Noveraber 9 1981
6 Final Cover An 18 inch soil cover shall be placed over the PVC liner The soil should be gravelly or sandy silt and silty sandy free of boulders brush stumps refuse debris and similar materials This cover is to be compacted by one pass with a tracked vehicle weighing no less than 20000 pounds and graded to maintain a 2 to 5 slope over the mounded area
-9shy
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
Re-vegetation Following the placement and grading of the final cover material the site shall be seeded and planted to promote permanent vegetation The various types of grasses legumes and shrubs suitable for use on-site are presented in Appendix B
Access controlUpon closure of the area as detailed above large boulders are to be placed around the entire area approxishymately 5 feet from the drainage channel
Figure 2 shows details of the final cover concept
- T C L ^
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
FIGURE NO 2
MOUNDED COVER MATERIAL
VEGETATION
2 - 0 bullbullvbullvbull^bullcbull-bullbull^^bullbull^bullbullbullbull^-Vbull bullbull-bull- bull bullbull bull bull 1 8 bullr^^^i]-^ltZi^^fr-i^vi- BANK-RUN GRAVEL bull T ^ V V r II mdash - - i ^ bullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 f ^bull S y r i y i ^Pgt^y^^Yi
w^f7m)yypPxpm 30 ANCHOR ^bulli^^--i--^^iy^rZii^^^x L
DRAINAGE CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
DRAINAGE AND ANCHORING DETAILS ( NOT TO SCALE)
Architects bull Enyineers bull Planners
CE MAGUIRE INC Providence Rhode Island - 1 1 shy
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
COST ESTIMATES
Capital Costs
Item
Area Fill Compacted Sand amp Gravel
Cover Material Compacted Soil Mix
Final Cover Material Compacted Loam or Equal
Drainage Channel Construction Bank Run Gravel
Final Seeding with Crown Vetch Fertilizer etc
Water Sampling Bailers
Membrane Liner MaterialShipmentLaborSupervision
Installation of Access Control Boulders LaborEquipraent
Quantity
7400 cy
2900 cy
1400 cy
90 cy 90 cy
170 sq yd
4
37455 sq ft LS 20 hrs 4 hrs
24 hrs 24 hrs
Unit Cost Installed
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 125cy
$ 050cy $ 100cy
$ 045sq yd
$4500each
$ 0l6sq ft 30000
750hr 1000hr
$ 750hr $6000hr
Subtotal
Engineering Well Installation Water Analysis
TOTAL
Based on use of on-site materials
Total Cost
$ 9250
3625
1750
45 90
80
180
6000 300 150 40
180 1440
$23130
18025
$41155
Average cost for low medium and high usage over 3 day period
-12shy
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
Operation Costs
Monitoring Program
Year 1 5 water quality samples 3 times during Year 1 at $375 per sample $ 5625
Year 2 to 30 5 water quality samples 4 times each year at $250 per sample 145000
Total Monitoring Costs
to Year 30
$150625
General Maintenance
Year 1 to 30 15 hrs of equipment time per year at
$65 per hrTotal Operation Costs to Year 30
$ 29250
$179875
Assuming no increase in laboratory fees
-13-
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
APPENDIX A
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
GUILD DP100 WATER STREET
TO ^ ^ J ^ g u i r e ^ Inc^^
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s
REPORT SENT TO i ^ o y e
SAMPLES SENT TO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
A I after Hours
1 1 9 At after_ Hours 8 2 8 8 0
LOCATION OF BORING
LLING CO IMC j EAST PROVIDENCE R I
lAnntJccc P r o v i d e n c e R I (ADDRESS L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I
PROJ NO
OUR JOB NO
CASING SAMPLER Rods bullNW Type NW SS
Size ID 3 1 3 8 Hccnmer Wt 300 140y^ Hammer Fall 24 30
a Ul o
Casing Blows
per (oot
Sample Depttis
F rom- To
0-l6
3-8
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sompler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
22 30 53
Moisture
Density or
Consist Mois t ve ry dense
Strata
Ctionge
Elev bull
3
8-13
13-18
18-23
23-25 25
81-65
CORE BAR
NXST
BIT D i a
SHEET 1 0 F _ DATE
HOLE NO BH-28
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dare TifTit
START 8 2 2 8 0
COMPLETE 8 2 5 8 0
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN P B r e s c i a INSPECTOR shySOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodation Type of SAMPLE soil etc Rock-color type Condi t ion hardshyness Drilling time seams and etc No
Brown medium to fine SAND amp F-C Gravel little silt b coarse sand boulders Gray GRANITE fractured Cl 6c seamy
Quartz Seams 02
C3
very hard
04
C5
Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 Slotted 226 Solid
One Riser Pipe amp Lock Bottom of Well 25 26 stick up
GROUND SURFACE TO i USED Jfli CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used l 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 t o l l o n 2 O D Sampler SUMMARY
iroce Olo 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Earth Boring 3DDry C Cored W=vosl-ed O-iO Loose 0 - 4 Soft 30 + Hord Rock Coring 22J UP Undisluroed Piston little l O t o 2 0
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSl i f f Somples 1TPiTest Pll AAjgef V-VaneTest some 2 0 t o 3 5
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
SHEET i _GUILD Dr LLIIMG CD INC )
DATE 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-2HOLE NO
C E MaRuire I n c x n u lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I bullj-Q j c iicigtiujicLINE a STA
PROJECT NAME S y l v e s t r i B r o s L a n d f i l l |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I OFFSETREPORT SENT TO above PROJ NO 3650
SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO mdash 8 1 - 6 5 SURF ELEV
Dofe Timi GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
At ofler Hours Rods-NW Type
CASING
NW
SAMPLER
SS
CORE BAR
N X S T START COMPLETE
8 2 1 8 0 8 2 2 8 0
A l 1 2 f ter 82880
-Hours
Size ID
Hammer Wf
Hammer Foil
3 300
24
1 3 8 140
30 BIT
D i a
TOTAL HRS BORING FORE INSPECTOR _ SOILS ENGR
[MAN P Br e s c i i
LOCATION OF BORING
XK UJ
o
Casing Blows
per foot
Somple Depths
From- To
Type of
Somple
Blows per 6 on Sampler
From To
0-6 I 6-12 12-18
Moisture
Density or
Consist
Strolo
Change
Elev
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remorks include colorgrodot ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortypecondition hardshyness Drilling t ime seams and etc
0-l6 D 12 22 30 Dry Brown fine to medium Sand very little fine to coarse dense gravel trace of silt
Wood - FILL 5
5-66 D 30 42 52 Brown F-M Sand amp F-C 3()0 We ight Gravel little silt tr
8 wood boulders - FILL 8-13 Gray GRANITE
very hard
13-18
18-21
(Quartz Seams)21-25
25 Bottom of Boring 25
Installed Observation Well 1 PVC Pipe 5 of Slotted PVC 226 ofSolid PVC One Riser Pipe 26 stick up Bottom of Well 25
GROUND SURFACE TO 8 USED NW CASING THEN Cored Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARgt
troce Oto 1 0 Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring _DDry CCored W=Aoshed UP Undisturbed Piston little 101020 O-lO Loose 0 - 4 Sott 30 + Hord Rock Coring
10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f fTPrTei t Pit A^Ajger V^Vone Test some 20 iD3 i
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
J
RHFFT 1 Of GUILD DF LLINt3 CO IMC Q nATF
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 BH -3 HOLE NO TO C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I LINE a STA _ PROJECT NA i^P ^ y ^ i ^ ^ ^ x ^ ^ w o ^ ^ ^ ^ u ^ JLO-ATION - ^ - - - j ^ - bull ^
OFFSFT REPORT SEN T T O a b o v e ]oc n 1 Mn
MTTr 81-65 bullyjRF Fl FV SAMPLES SE OUR JOB NO rraquo yenraquo T -
1 i m laquo GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS j ^ ^ ^ g _ ^ bdquo CASING SmPLER (X)RE BAR
5TART 8 2 7 8 0 At 2 1 6 1 after J 7 4 _ Hours ^ y p e ^ NW S S
m NXST COMPIETE 8 2 8 8 0
I n s i d e W e l l on bull o on TOTAL HRS
s7ltin 3 1 i b BORING FOREMAN ^ ^J r e s c i At a f t e r _ Hours Hommer Wt 300^^ 140^^ iNltiPFrTrlaquo
Hnmmpr Fnll 2 4 3 0 D i a SOUS FNfiR
1 nrATinro nFRnPiMr
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMF Blows Depths of on Sompler Remarks include color grodat ion Type of
Q Density UJ per From To Chonge soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple or O ness Drilling time seoms and etc foot 0 - 6 l_ 6-12 12-18 Elev No Per Consist
bull 0 - l 6 D 10 21 38 D r y Orange Brown f i n e t o medium 1 18
v e r y SAND amp f i n e G r a v e l cobb les dense
I 5 R o l l e r B i t t h r o u g h 6 B o u l d e r
bull l O - l l D 3 i 70 Wet Brown s i l t y medium t o f i n e T T I
I 300 ^ W t v e r y SAND amp f i n e t o medium G r a v e l t r a c e o f coa rse dense s a n d cobb les amp b o u l d e r s ( T i l l )
I 1 5 - 1 6 D 41 80 ri 3 12 300 ^ W t
1 7 6
I 1 7 6 - 2 0 6 C Gray GRANITE amp Q u a r t z C l 36 v e r y h a r d
I 2 0 6 - 2 5 6 C C2 60
I 2 5 6 - 2 7 6 C C3 24
I 2 7 6
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 7 6
I I n s t a l l e d O b s e r v a t i o n W e l l
1 PVC P ipe 5 S l o t t e d 2 4 6 S o l i d One R i s e r P ipe amp Lock
I Bot tom o f W e l l 2 7 6 2 6 s t i c k up
I Gf^OUND SURFACE TO _ 17 6- USED w CASING THEf J Cored t o 2 7 6
sample Ty( Proporti Dns Us( Jd 140 lbWt x3 0 fa l Ion 20D Sompler SUMN ARv Dr Ory CC ored W^Acshed trace O to lO Vo Cohes ionless Der isity Cohesive Consistency Earth Bonn g i U ^- Undistur bed Piston little g _ I0 lo20 0 10 Loo se 0 - 4 Soft 30-1-Hord Rock Corin
10- 30 Med D ense 4 - e MSl i f f Som ies _T P-Tesl Pit A-Ajger V-Vo ne Test some 20to35 I
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
i
SHEET 1 0 F _ J m GUILD DRILLING CD INC rgtATF
U 100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R 1 HOI F NO bull B H - J
TO - - ^ amp ^ ^ - ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ADDRESS shyn f a - n - i - r - i - A n i r - T T - i lt - laquo - ^ r lt ^ r i r - A r r r UNE a STA J o h n s t o n R I H O J b L l NA
O F F laquo ^ T TTO a b o v e R I SWMC 1 oor gtMn 3869 V P O R T SEN laquoaiRF Fl F V SAMPLES SE N T T n OUR JOB NO 8 2 - 5 4
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS 11 7 bull-bullbull bull^ nf tPT H n i r raquo -r
1 Type
_ of tpr - Hoi i r^ )jT a inHnmmPr Foil
j|OCATIOfJ OF BORING ^ 1
Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Blows D e p t h s of on Sampler
per From To F r o m - To Somple foot 0-6 L 6-121 12-18
0 - l 6 D 9 9 12
1 5 - 6 6 D 22 37 I J IB r mH 1 10-U6 D 2c 25 n1 Ml IB 1 1 3 6 - 1 8 6 Q
K
1 8 6 - 2 2 6 1 C
bull
n
_
1
CASING
W I
^ Stgtun
Mois tu re
Dens i ty or
Cons is t
D r y m e d i u m d e n s e
W e t v e r y d e n s e
W e t d e n s e
SAMPLER
C C j i ^
1 3 8 300^^
2 4
Strata Change
Elev
1 3 6
2 2 6
Dote TImi CORE BAR laquoTAPT 8 2 5 8 1 0
bullMVP O i ^ A j j J COMPlFTE a 2 b 0 1 ^ J
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F y ^ i c c i iwltiPFrrnR K Z
D i a SOtlSFNTR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION SAMPLE R e m a r k s inc lude c o l o r g r a d a t i o n T y p e o f soi l etc R o c k - c o l o r t y p e c o n d i t i o n ha rd r n e s s Drilling t i m e seoms and e tc No Pen Rec
Loam - B r o w n f i n e Sand 1 1 8 1 2 amp G r a v e l (Road F i l l )
B r o w n f i n e t o c o a r s e SAND 2 18 T amp f i n e t o m e d i u m G r a v e l some s i l t
c o l o r c h a n g e t o G r a y 3 18^ 7B r o w n
T o p o f R o c k
G r a y GRANITE v e r y h a r d C l 6 0 6 0
C2 4 8 45
B o t t o m o f B o r i n g 2 2 6
bull bull - mdash 1
GROUND SURFACE TO _ 1 3 6 1 U S E D _ Hw bullbull CASING T H E N C o r e d
ample Ty pe Propor t i ons U S I id fgt 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f a l l o n 2 O D Sompler SUMh ARgt L Cohes ionless Det is i ty 1 Cohesive Consistency Eorth Bonn o i -5 6 Dry C^C ored- W = Aashed troce O lo lO Vo
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
SHEET i O f GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I BH-L HOLE NO _JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c lADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e -RI
UKE a STA J o h n s t o n R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION 3869 OFFSET
REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC PROJ NOmdash SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO 82-54 SURF ELEV
Dote T i m t GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR 81881 START
A) after Hours HW-NW NXST Type COMPLETE Size ID 4 3 TOTAL HRS
At offer- Hours Hommer Wf Spun BIT BORING FOREMAN F R i c c i INSPECTOR KZ D i a Hammer Fall SCMLS ENGR
LOCATION OF BORING
Casing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture SOIL IDENTIFICATION Strata SAMPL Blows Depths of on Sampler Remorks include color grodol ion Type of a Density
UJ per From To or Change soil etc Rock-color type condition hord-F rom- To Somple ness Drilling t ime seams and etc No Pen o (oot 0-611 6-12 12-18 Consist Elev
20 Approx bottom of Refuse
2411 2911
2411 Top of Possible Rock
Gray GRANITE amp Quartz Seamy amp Fractured
cT UP
2911 shybull^An
C2 60
GROUt^D SURFACE TO
Somple Type
DDry C^ Cored W = Aoshed U P Undisturbed Piston T P T e s t P i l A A jger V^VoneTest
USED
Proportions Used troce 0 1 0 1 0 little l O t o 2 0 some 2 0 t o 3 5
3411 Bottom of Boring 3411
Installed Observation Well 10 of Slotted PVC Pipe 2611 of Solid PVC Pipe
2 ^ ^ U ^ VP CASING THEN
1 4 0 l b W t x 3 0 f o l l o n 2 O D Sompler Cohesionless Density
0-10 Loose 10-30 Med Dense I - c -
Cohesive Consistency 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + Hord 4 - 8 MSt i f f
SUMMA ^Eorth Boring
Rock Coring IJ Somples
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
SHEET i O F GUILD DRILLING CD INC DATE
100 WATER STREET EAST PROVIDENCE R I
JQ C E M a g u i r e I n c ADDRESS P r o v i d e n c e R I PROJECT NAME Hazardous Waste C l o s i n g |LOCATION J o h n s t o n R I REPORT SENT TO above R I SWMC y PROJ NO _ SAMPLES SENT TO OUR JOB NO
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS CASING
At 1 1 8 after Hours HWType 4 Size ID
At after- Hours Hommer Wt Spun Hommer Fall
LOCATION OF BORING Cosing Sample Type Blows per 6 Moisture Blows Depths of on Sompler
Q Density LJ per From To or F rom- To
foot 0-6 I 6-12 12-18 Consist
0 - l 6 D Drym d e n s e
O Somple
2 - 4 6 0
5 - 6 6 14 15 M o i s t medium d e n s e
1 0 - 1 1 6 J ^ J2A 2S_ M o i s t ve ry d e n s e
(a 15 lOC0 15-176 Roller Bit
176-236 C
SAMPLER
SS 1 3 8
300 30
Strata
Chonge
Elev
2
46
176
236
3869 82-54
CORE BAR NXST STARTNXD3 COMPLETE
BH-M HOLE NO _ 1
LINE a STA
OFFSET
SURF ELEV
Dote Time
8 2 7 8 1 8 3 1 8 1
TOTAL HRS BORING FOREMAN F R l c c T
BIT INSPECTOR K Z D i a SOILS ENGR
SOIL IDENTIFICATION Remarks include colorgradat ion Type of soil etc Rock-colortype condition hordshyness Drilling time seoms and etc
Erown Loam amp f i n e Sand-F IL l
Boulder
Irown fine to coarse SAND ]ittle silt amp fine to coarse gravel cobbles
(8 to 9 - Roller Bit shytrace boulder
Erown fine to coarse SAND amp fine Gravel some silt
Gray Brown GRANITE
(poss boulders)
(Sand amp Silt return in
drill water)
Bottom of Boring 236
Observation Well 235
10 Slotted
14 Solid
SAMPLE
No Pen
18
30^
18T
18
Cl 72
GROUND SURFACE TO USED CASING THEN
Somple Type Proportions Used 1401b Wtx 30 fa l l on 2 0 D Sampler SUMMARY Cohesionless Density Cohesive Consistency Eorth Boring 1 DDry C^Cored W^Aoshed Iroce Oto 1 0
0-10 Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 0 + H o r d Rock Coring 8 tUP Undisturbed Piston little l O t o 2 0 10-30 Med Dense 4 - 8 MSti f f Samples - T D - T o e D I l l - l i i n o r - W n n p T A laquo f
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
APPENDIX B
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
Grass and Legumes
Mix A (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Crownvetch Coronilla varia L Penngift Chemung or Emerald (30-35 hard seed 65-70 scarified seed) 50 98 60-F
Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea 25 98 85
Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne Manhattan or Balboa 25 95 90
Crownvetch seed should be inoculate within 24 hours before planting with the specific inoculum The inoculimi should be fresh and be used within the date limit prescribed by the manufacturer When hydroseeding 3 to 4 times the regular amount of inoculant is required
Rate of Application 40 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 4-20-20 rate to be determined by soil test pH Adjustment Add Limestone if soil test indicates acidic
condition Seeding Date April 1 to 30th Mulch Cellulose fiber at 2500 lbsacre on slopes
and 1500 lbsacre on nearly level areas applied hydraulically
Mix B (No loam required)
NAME by Weight Purity Germination
Rubens Canada Bluegrass 50 85 75 K-31 Tall Fescue 25 85 75 Creeping Red Fescue 25 98 85
Rate of Application 50 lbsacre Method of Application Hydroseeding preferred Fertilizer 10-10-10 at 300 lbsacre pH Adjustment Add limestone if soil tests indicate
acidic condition Seeding Dates March 15-June 15 August 15-October 15
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
Shrubs
For increased slope stability and aesthetic appeal it is recommended that seedlings of Fragrant Sumac (Zhus aromatica) Autumn Olive and Bristly Locust (arnot) be planted on the completed slopes of the landshyfill with the recommend grass mixture Seedlings should be 12 to 24 in height and be planted at a staggered spacing of 10 feet center to center at selected zones
Characteristics of the recommended shrubs are as follows
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
White or Fragrant Sumac Brilliant red Fall color hieght 9-15 feet excellent for colorful mass-planting very hardy tolerates wind and poor soils
Autumn Olive Attractive narrow silvery green leaves small fragrant yellowish white flowers grow to 12 feet red berries handy berries are favorite of birds dense growth provides shelter for wildlife tolerates ordinary soil
Bristly Locust Excellent for erosion control and quick cover on poor sterile soil developed by USDA for this purpose very hardy fast growing grows 3 to 8 feet in four (4) years bright green leaves rose colored flowers high tolerance for landfill conditions
Planting of trees within the landfill limits is not recormnended due to the high potential for overturn of mature trees in high wind conshyditions Shrub roots will spread out and anchor into the final cover material and their relatively low profile reduces the possibility of wind damage
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
bullbull - bull bull i - - - ^ ym - bull bull bull -bullbull bull P - f bull ^ bull^bullbullbull bull t-i - -- -- 7Myppy ylt
bullbull - r 7pPy^gt bull bull shyr bullbull ^ vbull - - ^ V K ^ - j - V ^ shy
bdquo ^ bull bull bull bull ^ bull ^ - i i raquo - bull
bull - bull bull bull - i v gt i ^ - r - bullbullbullbullbullbull gtgt-bull A -
iC- - ^ bull bullgt- v-Vj- J r- V bull mdash ^ - bull i r bull ^ V ^ r bull bull bull bull bull Lv^--i -^fii r- bullshy -^ bull - -r-v^r-^
i ^ - i U N D I S T U R B E D AREA Z - ]^Z - bull bull bullbullbull ^ ~ ^ ^ _ - bull shy P TO BE MAPPED ) bull ^ lt i ^ bullbull bull r
8i bullbull bull bull - r bull bull bull Z bull bull y 36A6 bullbull-yy- i yp iy i bull Alt
LEGEND Z-Z^Z PY gt p^yy- p y
bull bull - bull bull bull bull bull bull y bullbull bull ^ bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbull K - y ^
3CA9 bull EXISTING OBSERVATION WELL OW )bull bull ^ P -- P7 bull-ZZ 3atgtZ bull bull bull bull - bullbull - V reg bull tt- bull -V ^ - PROPOSED OBSERVATION WELL (OW) y-zr
- - V 3 ( ^ y Z p - bullbull Z bull ZYZZyZ - bull bull bull T - bull bull INSTALLED AUQ 1981 )
-pp w
lt - v j y - P t bullbullbull bullbull bull f
y^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull r l bull bull4lt^
N 1 2 0 0 0 y EL362gt5i^ bull bull bullbull
Top of pipe = 3 6 5 i e f i SP 8 S E bull bull bull bull bull - y bull bull - - bull bull bull bull bull ^ bull I Hazardous Waste Area contours and limits of f i l l areos based
bull C bull bull bull ^ bull i s bull bull ^ bull bull i^^pyrpyyyy^y f p y on field survey data compiled April 2 3 1981
bull bull bull bull W V^^^ i y 7 y y y p z y y 0 bull 2General Site Topography based on May 1979 mapping cornpiled - l - bull bull bull bull 7 y y i ^ y lt ~ ^ ^ i
bullbullbullbullbull I bull - bull bull - bull - - bull bull v - - - ^ gt yen bull bull bull gt v - - ^ T - ^ v ^ bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull V i t i ^ bull bull ^ bull bull - gtx by photogrammetric methods using stereo derlaj photogrophjr -- bullgt bullbull- i- bullbull bullbullbull v- i_v- y - bull ^^bullA^^irbull-^^bullbull^^^bullvV^bullrVjibullbullbull^bullbullJ^bull
ampifperformed Feb Z S 7 3 y -ZpY-yZ yy- bull 7 ^bullPjyy-Zppy ^
bullbullbullbullbull bullbull- vbull-bull-^v^vbull^^ bullbullrgt gtv gt - - ^ i- bull bull v bull bull ^r^J^ v-^^^t-v bull ^ ^ - f e ^ i V v f bull bull bull gt bull = - gt j i j V bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull - bull bull - bull j ^ - - - bull bull - 1 - bull ^ - gt - bull lt ( - v S bull-bull P ^ z 7y7y-yypy zyy7yypfzpp ^ ^ bullbullr---r~ bullbullbull^bullbullbullbull-i- -i-T-- raquobullbull-bullgtvsgt-~i--ra-- bull j r ^ZiS^ZiZZZ^^-i^--
bull bull - ^ ^ bull bull bull bull h gt y ^ h gt gt ^ p Z i ^ ^ lt ^ - i--^U bullbullZ^^^v- bull-
I P ^ bull^bulli-^i- raquo-iV-
n P A W K f raquo g - P gt L O R E S ^ ^ - DESIGNEDi^ GPP^i CMFy i l bull bull - w - raquo - - f gt S v ^ - i - bull bull bull - bull ^ bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull l ^ bullH
-V iViT- i gtfr bull
r^V-Ti^ i~ ByfSwMC CENTRAi LANDFILiS P2 bullbullbullbull- --raquobullsi^gt^JltyVi^bullbulllti^^vt^VvA^^bullbull^ --^v--^ ^^bullbull^v^Sbull^bull^^raquo^lt^bull^^v^gt^Ilabullbull
bull bull bull p -pZ- SHUNr PltE tJOHNSTOrsh R i t i ^bullY^J7rm^ppyp^ euroEM_N0i^v3869^
^gt ltP -r7 ^ A J3-^ HAZARDOUS WASTE AREA CLOSING DRAWING NOi^ ^^^ - - ]^yBPM0^mmmp
| l | l | | t S I TE bull TOPOGR A^^ ti^^j^ ^ii^-Zf 7y7ZPi Architectsrgt gngjneersgt PJannerj^Sfe
J yym^m CEMAGUiREfiNG Providence Rfede Island
p^y^yy^^^^yy y y^i^^-^-f^-itfi^
pypypi^P^iyzizy Z p--i7i-p7 PPiSPPshybull _ - - bull v ^ ^ bull ^ bull bull bull J ^ ^ J - r i - bullbullbullbull
7y^PMiM MPz- bull- f i - r j - j t bull^ |-i bull J ^ bull L r bull ^ bull ^ - ^^V
Jgt bull - ~^j ^i^ySKyiXA^^Sii^r^^
tr^gt^^j^w5tlt^gtU ^(Si I i i
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7
O k BL 3820 ) - bdquo
c ^p 9f pipe- miukgt TP yZ
EL 36245 Top of plpe= 36515
Tgt( of ^ e = 3 ^ j 3 3
WP
z ^7 IP7