27
July 24, 2001 Sustainable Sustainable Rangelands Rangelands Roundtable Roundtable Process and Process and Procedures Procedures Tom Bartlett Tom Bartlett
| Date post: | 27-Mar-2015 |
| Category: |
Documents |
| Upload: | benjamin-dunlap |
| View: | 213 times |
| Download: | 0 times |
July 24, 2001
Sustainable Sustainable Rangelands Rangelands RoundtableRoundtable
Process and ProceduresProcess and Procedures
Tom BartlettTom Bartlett
July 24, 2001
Roundtable MeetingsRoundtable Meetings
Facilitated and InteractiveFacilitated and Interactive Agenda: Will be sent before each Agenda: Will be sent before each
meeting of the Roundtablemeeting of the Roundtable Meetings will be two daysMeetings will be two days Morning of the first dayMorning of the first day
Update new membersUpdate new members IntroductionIntroduction
July 24, 2001
Afternoon of the first day.Afternoon of the first day. Agenda will have the starting point.Agenda will have the starting point. One or more presentations related to One or more presentations related to
the topic for the meeting.the topic for the meeting. Agenda is flexible to fit needs, Agenda is flexible to fit needs,
progress and dynamics of the progress and dynamics of the group.group. Lou Romero will adjust agenda.Lou Romero will adjust agenda.
Roundtable MeetingsRoundtable Meetings
July 24, 2001
Roundtable MeetingsRoundtable Meetings
At the end of day two:At the end of day two: We will decide what we have We will decide what we have
attained.attained. We will determine the topics for the We will determine the topics for the
Delphi process between the meetings.Delphi process between the meetings. We will agree on a rough agenda for We will agree on a rough agenda for
the next meeting.the next meeting.
July 24, 2001
Delphi ProcessDelphi Process
Building between meetings.Building between meetings. Continue to develop ideas.Continue to develop ideas. Obtain discussion and agreement on Obtain discussion and agreement on
products of the previous meeting.products of the previous meeting. Discuss needs for the next meeting.Discuss needs for the next meeting. To be successful, SRR members To be successful, SRR members
must participate and exchange must participate and exchange ideas.ideas.
July 24, 2001
Delphi ProcessDelphi Process
Open-ended or opinion questions.Open-ended or opinion questions. Helen Rowe will send out questions.Helen Rowe will send out questions. Members will respond.Members will respond. Helen will analyze and summarize Helen will analyze and summarize
responses.responses. Individual responses will be Individual responses will be
anonymous.anonymous. Process will be iterative. Process will be iterative.
July 24, 2001
SRR TeamSRR Team Hosts: Hosts:
Tom Bartlett, Colorado State University Tom Bartlett, Colorado State University John Mitchell, Rocky Mountain Research Station, John Mitchell, Rocky Mountain Research Station,
FSFS Facilitator: Lou Romero, de LaPorte & Facilitator: Lou Romero, de LaPorte &
AssocAssoc Kristie Maczko, Rocky Mountain StationKristie Maczko, Rocky Mountain Station
Hotel arrangementsHotel arrangements NotesNotes CommunicationsCommunications
July 24, 2001
SRR TeamSRR Team
Helen Rowe, Colorado State UniversityHelen Rowe, Colorado State University Delphi ProcessDelphi Process Web page Web page CommunicationsCommunications
Noelle Grether, Colorado State UniversityNoelle Grether, Colorado State University Travel reimbursementTravel reimbursement
Idea Staff and CoordinationIdea Staff and Coordination Alison Hill, WO, FSAlison Hill, WO, FS Larry Bryant, WO, FSLarry Bryant, WO, FS Mike Manfredo, CSUMike Manfredo, CSU
July 24, 2001
SRR TeamSRR Team
Steering Committee Steering Committee Tom Bartlett, Colorado State University Tom Bartlett, Colorado State University John Mitchell, Rocky Mountain Research John Mitchell, Rocky Mountain Research
Station, FSStation, FS Tom Reuwsaat, WO, BLMTom Reuwsaat, WO, BLM Evert Byington, WO, ARSEvert Byington, WO, ARS Alison Hill, WO, FSAlison Hill, WO, FS Larry Bryant, WO, FSLarry Bryant, WO, FS Ex-officio – Kristie Maczko, Helen RoweEx-officio – Kristie Maczko, Helen Rowe
July 24, 2001
Sustainable Rangelands Sustainable Rangelands RoundtableRoundtable
OpenOpen PositivePositive Future focusedFuture focused DynamicDynamic
AgendaAgenda MembersMembers
Values and respects all opinions Values and respects all opinions and contributions of membersand contributions of members
July 24, 2001
Sustainable Rangelands Sustainable Rangelands RoundtableRoundtable
The group determines the The group determines the outcomes.outcomes.
Identify indicators for Sustainable Identify indicators for Sustainable RangelandsRangelands
Indicators are suitable nationwide.Indicators are suitable nationwide. Gain from other efforts:Gain from other efforts:
Sustainable Forest RoundtableSustainable Forest Roundtable Sustainable Minerals RoundtableSustainable Minerals Roundtable
July 24, 2001
SRR Working GroupsSRR Working Groups
Outreach Working GroupOutreach Working Group Lori Hidinger, ESALori Hidinger, ESA
Coordination Working GroupCoordination Working Group Tom Roberts, BLMTom Roberts, BLM
Scale Working GroupScale Working Group Paul Geissler, USGSPaul Geissler, USGS
July 24, 2001
SRR Time LineSRR Time Line
Would like to be done by 2003.Would like to be done by 2003. Nine Meetings:Nine Meetings:
Four meetings in 2001; five in 2002.Four meetings in 2001; five in 2002. 20012001
April – DenverApril – Denver June – Salt Lake CityJune – Salt Lake City July – RenoJuly – Reno Nov. – San AntonioNov. – San Antonio
DynamicDynamic
July 24, 2001
Schedule of Meetings Schedule of Meetings
Reno, NVReno, NV July 24-25, 2001July 24-25, 2001 San Antonio, TXSan Antonio, TX Nov. 7-8, 2001Nov. 7-8, 2001 Tucson, AZTucson, AZ Jan. 9-10, 2002Jan. 9-10, 2002 Denver,CODenver,CO March 26-27, 2002March 26-27, 2002 Washington, DCWashington, DC May 29-30, 2002May 29-30, 2002 Billings, MTBillings, MT July 29-30, 2002July 29-30, 2002 Las Vegas, NVLas Vegas, NV Nov. 6-7, 2002Nov. 6-7, 2002
July 24, 2001
SRR SupportSRR Support
Time and effort of all individuals Time and effort of all individuals and organizations participating.and organizations participating.
USDA Forest ServiceUSDA Forest Service Colorado State UniversityColorado State University Bureau of Land ManagementBureau of Land Management Agricultural Research ServiceAgricultural Research Service Additional partnersAdditional partners
July 24, 2001
Benefits of the Work of Benefits of the Work of SRRSRR
Criteria and indicators can provide Criteria and indicators can provide a comprehensive, holistic view of a comprehensive, holistic view of rangeland conditions, rangeland conditions, incorporating ecological, economic, incorporating ecological, economic, social and institutional measures.social and institutional measures.
Criteria and indicators show a Criteria and indicators show a linkage between sustaining society linkage between sustaining society and sustaining the environment.and sustaining the environment.
July 24, 2001
Benefits of the Work of Benefits of the Work of SRRSRR
Use of criteria and indicators provides a Use of criteria and indicators provides a common language and framework to common language and framework to evaluate status of U.S. rangelands.evaluate status of U.S. rangelands.
Criteria and indicators can enhance Criteria and indicators can enhance informed dialogue, policy-making, and informed dialogue, policy-making, and rangeland management.rangeland management.
Roundtable protocol is interactive process Roundtable protocol is interactive process involving multiple stakeholders, enabling involving multiple stakeholders, enabling values of all groups to contribute.values of all groups to contribute.
July 24, 2001
Benefits of the Work of Benefits of the Work of SRRSRR
The work of SRR will help define and The work of SRR will help define and direct research on the measurement direct research on the measurement and monitoring of sustainability and monitoring of sustainability indicators.indicators.
The work of the SRR will be The work of the SRR will be coordinated with other efforts on coordinated with other efforts on implementing a comprehensive implementing a comprehensive approach to monitoring U.S. approach to monitoring U.S. rangelands. rangelands.
July 24, 2001
Products of SRRProducts of SRR
Symposium and Proceedings at the Symposium and Proceedings at the 2002 SRM Annual Meeting in 2002 SRM Annual Meeting in Kansas City, MOKansas City, MO
Report on Sustainable Rangelands Report on Sustainable Rangelands in Spring, 2003. in Spring, 2003. Will be used as input into First Will be used as input into First
Approximation Report – June 2003.Approximation Report – June 2003.
July 24, 2001
SRR MissionSRR Mission
The Roundtable will identify The Roundtable will identify indicators of sustainability based indicators of sustainability based on social, economic, and ecological on social, economic, and ecological factors, to provide a framework for factors, to provide a framework for national assessments of national assessments of rangelands and rangeland use.rangelands and rangeland use.
July 24, 2001
SRR Vision for RangelandsSRR Vision for Rangelands
We envision a future in which We envision a future in which rangelands in the U.S. rangelands in the U.S. provide a desired mix of provide a desired mix of economic, ecological and economic, ecological and social benefits to current social benefits to current and future generations.and future generations.
July 24, 2001
Vision for the SRR ProcessVision for the SRR Process
We envision a future where We envision a future where we have widely accepted we have widely accepted criteria and indicators for criteria and indicators for monitoring and assessing monitoring and assessing the economic, social and the economic, social and ecological sustainability of ecological sustainability of rangelands.rangelands.
July 24, 2001
SRR Guiding PrinciplesSRR Guiding Principles
1.1. Collectively, indicators Collectively, indicators should guide monitoring should guide monitoring efforts to measure efforts to measure rangeland sustainability in rangeland sustainability in the U.S. at the national the U.S. at the national scale. Indicators should scale. Indicators should guide monitoring efforts at guide monitoring efforts at multiple scales.multiple scales.
July 24, 2001
SRR Guiding PrinciplesSRR Guiding Principles
2.2. Ensure that the indicators Ensure that the indicators employ the appropriate employ the appropriate temporal and spatial scales for temporal and spatial scales for assessing the criteria.assessing the criteria.
3.3. Collectively, C&I will address Collectively, C&I will address social, ecological, and economic social, ecological, and economic aspects of sustainability.aspects of sustainability.
July 24, 2001
SRR Guiding PrinciplesSRR Guiding Principles
4.4. Use a C&I framework as a Use a C&I framework as a common language and common language and operational framework for operational framework for defining and assessing defining and assessing sustainability. Begin by sustainability. Begin by considering C&I of SFR.considering C&I of SFR.
July 24, 2001
SRR Guiding PrinciplesSRR Guiding Principles
5.5. Review and consider other Review and consider other indicator initiatives.indicator initiatives.
6.6. Numerous political questions Numerous political questions related to rangelands. We related to rangelands. We will focus on vision-mission will focus on vision-mission agreed to by SRR.agreed to by SRR.
July 24, 2001
SRR Guiding PrinciplesSRR Guiding Principles
7.7. Process will feature outreach to Process will feature outreach to stakeholders, open dialogue, stakeholders, open dialogue, and respect for differing and respect for differing opinions.opinions.
8.8. The SRR will be supportive of The SRR will be supportive of and compatible with improved and compatible with improved on-the-ground management of on-the-ground management of rangelands. rangelands.
