Date post: | 16-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | charles-houston |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 0 times |
June 22, 2011
Ellen M. Wells, Matt Berges, Stephen Vesper, Iwona Yike, H. Lester Kirchner, Stuart Greenberg, Dorr G. Dearborn
Long term follow-up of home environmental remediation for mold & moisture
Long term follow-up of home environmental remediation for mold & moisture
PRESENTATION OUTLINEBackgroundUMMPUMMP IIConclusions
Ellen M. Wells1, Matt Berges2, Stephen Vesper3, Iwona Yike1, H. Lester Kirchner4, Stuart Greenberg2, Dorr G. Dearborn1
1: Swetland Center for Environmental Health, CWRU School of Medicine; Cleveland, OH 2: Environmental Health Watch; Cleveland, OH 3: US Environmental Protection Agency; Cincinnati, OH 4: Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA
Urban Mold and Moisture Project II
PARTNERSSwetland Center for Environmental Health, CWRU School of Medicine, granteeEnvironmental Health WatchUniversity HospitalsCuyahoga County Board of HealthUS Environmental Protection AgencyCuyahoga County Department of Development
FUNDERSHUD Office of Healthy Homes and Lead ControlUS Environmental Protection Agency
BACKGROUND
Moisture in the home
At least 20% of U.S. buildings have signs of dampness
Moisture is more likely with• Overcrowding• Insufficient heating, ventilation, and insulation
A Cleveland Perspective• Older housing stock• High poverty levels For more information, see: Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality:
Dampness and Mould, World Health Organization, 2009; Damp Indoor Spaces and Health, Institute of Medicine, 2004
www.ehw.org
Extent of the issue
Moisture in the home
Consequences of excess moisture • Leads to microbial growth (mold)• Initiates chemical or biological degradation of materials• Encourages presence of pests
Presence of dampness is considered to be a risk factor for asthma and respiratory disease
For more information, see: Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality: Dampness and Mould, World Health Organization, 2009; Damp Indoor Spaces and Health, Institute of Medicine, 2004
Connection with health
Fungi (i.e., mold)
Ubiquitous eukaryotic organismsHundreds of different speciesGrowth limited by temperature, nutrients,
moistureHealth effects include• Infections, allergies, toxicities
Health effects may arise from• Viable (live), or nonviable (dead) or fragments of organismsFor more information, see: Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality:
Dampness and Mould, World Health Organization, 2009; Damp Indoor Spaces and Health, Institute of Medicine, 2004
URBAN MOLD & MOISTURE PROGRAM
Urban Mold & Moisture Program
Components of the program• Visual inspections of homes• Homes sampled for mold• Moisture reduction interventions• Monitoring respiratory health
Will reduction of moisture in homes improve homes and health?
Leaks Cooking, Bathing,Watering Plants,Breathing,Washing
Surface water
Groundwater
Air From Soil
Urban Mold & Moisture Program
Repair the “Cleveland drop”Flash the soil to the houseTreat the porch like a roofEliminate sub-slab duct and heating systemsDisconnect and redirect downspoutsReduce moisture in crawlspacesCorrect negative grade at foundationRemove debris in basementsVent clothes dryer to exteriorOccupant education
Moisture intervention goals
Urban Mold & Moisture Program
Randomized controlled trialEligibility criteria
• Children hospitalized for asthma within the past year• Mold visible in the home
All children (n=62) had medical care optimizedRoughly half (n=29) of the homes were remediated
• Children assessed at 6 and12 months• Homes reassessed at 12 months
For more information, see: Kercsmar et al. 2006. Environmental Health Perspectives 114(8):1574-1580.
A subset of the program where families had asthmatic children
Urban Mold & Moisture Program
Significant decrease in symptom days (p = 0.004) after repairs
Lower rate of ER visits and hospitalizations • Remediation group: 1 of 29 • Control group: 11 of 33, p = 0. 003).
Outcomes from asthma study
For more information, see: Kercsmar et al. 2006. Environmental Health Perspectives 114(8):1574-1580.
URBAN MOLD & MOISTURE PROGRAM II
Urban Mold and Moisture Project II
Sustainability/maintenance of housing improvements
Do these interventions need to be modified?
Home visual inspections to identify moldSampling for mold and moistureMaintenance of respiratory symptom
improvements
Are home moisture interventions effective 5 to 8 years later?
UMMP II
104 homes renovated in 2000-5
44 (42%) visited in 2008-9• 28 (63.6%) with original
families • 16 (36.4%) with new families
Data collected at the visits• Visual inspection for mold• Dust sampling for mold• Occupant questionnaire• Visual assessment of
interventions
Housing interventions
Repair of the “Cleveland drop”• Did not require maintenance
• All were still in place and functional
Eliminate sub-slab duct work• Concrete in holes in duct work, new
furnace
• All were still in place and functional
Interventions still in working order
For more information, see: “Moisture Control in Older Housing: Observations of a Five Year Follow Up”, Environmental Health Watch, www.ehw.org
Housing interventions
Flash the soil to the house• Poor implementation can exacerbate problem• Flat trenches, rubber ending near foundation
Treat the porch like a roof• Temperature gradients may still cause moisture
Reduce moisture in crawl spaces• Use of plastic may trap water from other sources• Including ‘rat slabs’ could help prevent pests
Correct negative grade at foundation• Not every grade was completely corrected• Maintenance also needed to maintain these
Functional, but some improvements needed
For more information, see: “Moisture Control in Older Housing: Observations of a Five Year Follow Up”, Environmental Health Watch, www.ehw.org
Housing interventions
Disconnection, redirection of downspouts• Most common problem • Not maintained, occasionally missing• Some implementations exacerbate problem• Location can be a problem for other activities
Remove debris from basement• Staff occasionally not allowed into basement• Several basements still had debris
Vent clothing dryer to outside• Common for the vent to become disconnected• In some cases this was intentional
Post-intervention events contributed to failure
For more information, see: “Moisture Control in Older Housing: Observations of a Five Year Follow Up”, Environmental Health Watch, www.ehw.org
Visual inspections for mold
Room 5-8 years vs. baseline 5-8 years vs. clearance
Basement, any surface Significant decrease Significant decrease
Basement, cellulose Significant decrease Significant decrease
Kitchen Significant decrease Decrease
Bathroom Significant decrease Decrease
Symptom questionnaires
Given to families with a new infant, mold in the homeBaseline, 1 year and 5-8 years following remediationLimited to those who had not moved 5-8 years later
(n=56)General symptoms
• Several symptoms decreased at 1 year, but not 5-8 years later
Respiratory symptoms• Most significantly improved at 1 year, but no significant
improvement from baseline at 5-8 years• ‘A lot of mucus of phlegm’, ‘shortness of breath or rapid
breathing’ showed significant improvement at 5-8 years (v. baseline)
Asthma exacerbations
Repeated interviews among 26 families with interventions• 16 had moved, 10 had not moved• Exacerbation = ER visit or hospitalization
Among those who had moved• 6 out of 16 children (37.5%) had a total of 10
exacerbations
Among those who had not moved• 2 out of 10 children (20.5%) had a total of 3
exacerbations
Analysis of mold in dust
QPCR analysis of 33 mold species in homes of asthmatic children
Bedroom TV/Living room
Clearance vs. baseline Significant decrease (5 spp)
5-8 years vs. clearance Significant decrease (3 spp)Significant increase (20 spp)
5-8 years vs. baseline Significant decrease (1 spp)Significant increase (20 spp)
CONCLUSIONS
Conclusions, part 1
Sustainability of housing interventions• Overall these houses remain in better condition• Consider interventions not requiring maintenance even if
more cost• Education regarding the purpose, maintenance of
interventions
Occurrence of self-reported respiratory symptoms• In most cases, a decline at 1 year was not maintained
There are long term benefits to moisture interventions; however, maintenance continues to be an issue
Conclusions, part 2
Asthma exacerbations among those in renovated homes• Fewer exacerbations among those still in renovated homes
compared to those who moved
Presence of mold in homes of asthmatics• A few species had lower concentrations • Many species increased in concentrations compared to
baseline or just post clearance
Acknowledgements
Jodi Lavrich Mia GellesDebrah MuhammadMargaret PizziAkbar Tyler