+ All Categories
Home > Documents > K.J. Ketteringham, A.T. Laws, J. Brown, D. Collard, N.I...

K.J. Ketteringham, A.T. Laws, J. Brown, D. Collard, N.I...

Date post: 25-Apr-2019
Category:
Upload: nguyenngoc
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
Quality of drinking water supplied to Aboriginal communities – Western Australia: causes, implications and protection measures. Some 300 communities are home to about 17 000 people. Of these: about 45 are Aboriginal town-based communities (ATBC) about 20 Remote Area Essential Services Program (RAESP) communities have a population over 200, with Bidyadanga the largest with 850 about 91 are remote communities with populations exceeding 50, and serviced through the Remote Area Essential Services Program (RAESP) the remaining discrete communities have a population less than 50, and are generally located in remote areas of the state The poster describes the current and proposed models for the provision of drinking water to this diverse range of Aboriginal communities. K.J. Ketteringham, A.T. Laws, J. Brown, D. Collard, N.I. Brooks & N.P. Mantle Looking after all our water needs Remote Area Essential Services Program (RAESP) A joint federal/state program managed by the Department of Housing and Works has delivered and maintained water, power and wastewater services since 1997 through contracted state program managers (CSPM). RAESP measures currently include: hydrogeological investigations and drilling development of water source protection and management plans (20 to date). Advisory Committee for the Purity of Water (ACPOW) measures include: review of monthly water analyses from the CSPM in line with the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines. Concerns for remote communities: the lack of water source protection for many small, and the more remote, non-RAESP communities variation between the modes of water service delivery. Variations: Communities close to a town usually receive town-supplied services to the community boundary, but the communities are responsible for infrastructure within the community. Emergency breakdowns are supported through the Town Reserves Regularisation Program managed by Department of Housing and Works. For remote communities managed under RAESP, and regional service providers, the CSPM is responsible for infrastructure, monitoring and treating water supplies, and conducting emergency repairs. The water and wastewater services for communities < 50 people used to be supported through ATSIC. While they now receive support for emergency repairs of infrastructure through RAESP, water quality is not frequently monitored. Community layout plans (CLP) and future protection measures Community drinking water source areas (CDWSA) for non town-based, remote communities are protected through various protection measures. Some already have water source protection and management plans prepared under the RAESP program, which can be incorporated into CLP developed by Department for Planning and Infrastructure (DPI). DPI is developing and reviewing CLP for remote communities not already covered by a town planning scheme. CLP development involves community and government stakeholders. A buffers policy being developed by DPI will include protection zones around drinking water sources. Protection measures will be enhanced in line with a new water services delivery model currently being considered. Some communities experience water quality problems associated with regional groundwater quality issues – nitrate, uranium, arsenic and heavy metals have been detected at levels that require treatment to meet the ADWG. In larger RAESP communities, health- related issues are being resolved by treatment, but for some smaller communities drinking water is being carted in. Contamination of water sources can be caused by community infrastructure (e.g. location of wastewater disposal and power stations adjacent to water bores). When community development occurs upstream of the water source bores contamination risk is increased. Small community supplies are not frequently tested for water quality. This issue is being considered in the new service delivery model. Cultural issues: Aboriginal heritage areas and culturally sensitive sites (e.g. birthing places, ceremonial areas, men’s and women’s areas) require protection. These sites can limit or assist the opportunity to safely locate bores. Wild camels in the Western Desert region damage water infrastructure and contaminate borefields (Source: Nadelle Brooks 10/04/05). Bores located close to a community increases the water contamination risks (Source: Nadelle Brooks 9/04/05) (Source: Tourism WA 27/11/07) (Source: Tourism WA 27/11/07) The way forward Water sources for town-based communities are protected through the existing Drinking Water Source Protection Plans (DWSPP) for each town’s Public Drinking Water Source Area (PDSWA). Proclamation of PDWSA under the Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947 enables by-laws to be applied to prevent contamination. Priority areas, protection zones and land- use planning ensure that source protection is achieved. Below is an example of a DWSPP developed by the Department of Water for a small town. This approach could be applied to Aboriginal communities. Essential services delivery model The Department of Water is working with other government agencies to improve water services to Aboriginal communities through a single service delivery model appropriate for the nature and remoteness of the various communities. This proposal will improve essential service provision to Aboriginal communities in the state, and bring them up to the same standard as for comparable ‘mainstream’ towns. Conclusion The delivery of a good quality water supply and its protection for most Aboriginal communities in Western Australia is currently under review. A new model is being developed to improve water source protection and water services for Aboriginal communities. A community layout plan for Bardi (Ardyaloon) (Source: www.wapc.wa.gov.au 29/10/07). N KULLARI Broome WUNAN Kununurra MALARABAH Derby WESTERN DESERT Warburton NGARDA NGARLI YARNDU South Hedland YAMATJI Geraldton PERTH NOONGAR Perth MULGA MALLEE Kalgoorlie NOONGAR COUNTRY Perth Albany Boddington Bridgetown Broome Busselton Carnarvon Collie Cue Dalwallinu Denham Derby Dongara Esperance Exmouth Fitzroy Crossing Fremantle Geraldton Gnowangerup Halls Creek Kalbarri Karratha Katanning Kellerberrin Kununurra Lake Grace Laverton Leinster Leonora Marble Bar Margaret River Meekatharra Merredin Moora Morawa Mount Magnet Mukinbudin Mullewa Nannup Narrogin Newman Norseman Northam Onslow Pannawonica Paraburdoo Pemberton Pinjarra Port Hedland Quairading Ravensthorpe Southern Cross Tom Price Wiluna Wyalkatchem Wyndham Yalgoo PERTH Kalgoorlie Nullagine Bunbury Mandurah Western Australia ATSIC Regions (Source: www.dia.wa.gov.au 29/10/07) A typical small remote community (Source: Department of Water 05/11/07) A typical medium sized remote community (Source: Department of Water 05/11/07) A typical large remote community (Source: Department of Water 05/11/07) Wongatha (Mulga Mallee) Region high rainfall deficit and poor recharge groundwater is limited and of poor quality in fractured rocks, except where there is local recharge, but can often be found in calcrete drainages, where it is prone to contamination community populations: <50 = 22%; 50-199 = 78%; and >200 = 0% Kununurra (Wunan) Region location of bores dependent on highly fractured zones water supplies limited and subject to dewatering when recharge fails southern communities often have brackish/saline water due to fine-grained sediments and lack of regular recharge community populations: <50 = 69%; 50-199 = 20%; and >200 = 11% Derby (Malarabah) Region water is sourced from sandstone aquifers some yield good quality water, but others are finer grained, with shale interbeds, and can have lower yields and higher salinities north of Derby older sediments and fractured granites and volcanics yield limited supplies of variable quality water restricted to fracture zones and bedding planes community populations: <50 = 59%; 50-199 = 35%; and >200 = 6% Broome (Kullari) Region Water quality from sandstone aquifers is generally potable. Coastal community supplies can be affected by saline intrusion and careful management of pumping is required. community populations: <50 = 85%; 50-199 = 10%; and >200 = 5% 4 11 10 6 0 metres N As-constructed detail supplied by Sinclair Knight Merz Base information supplied by the Western Australian Land Information Authority, GL248-2007-2 100 200 300 400 500 Z:\projects\country_planning\pacp\Bardi \CLP_Bardi_context_A3z51_10Aug07.dgn CLP derived from Bardi Draft Community Layout Plan as supplied by HGM visitors’ beach access boat ramp visitors’ lookout main visitors’ beach access visitors’ beach access water compound transformer shed rocky area disused sewage ponds 11 ONE ARM ROAD POINT ONE ARM POINT ROAD d a o R e u q e v e L e p a C e m o o r B m k 9 x o r p p a Crown Reserve 20 927 Aboriginal Lands Trust 5 152.77 ha Lot 89 Crown Reserve 20 927 Aboriginal Lands Trust 5 152.77 ha Lot 89 858.59 ha Lot 215 Indian Ocean tree No go area fence Legend industrial future residential community open space / recreation staff residential open space / bush road reserve business / commercial public utility drainage existing residential pedestrian access road gate P track boundary of land under Aboriginal community act 1979 landmark area boundary contour ridge line or levee water pipe phone box Telstra cable electrical cable power pole sewer pipe bore pump P P existing cadastre 12 future layout and Lot no. 140 NOTE : This CLP does not constitute development approval relevant to for incorporated of Materials of Water It is the responsibility of the developer to ensure that all consents, approvals, licences and clearances are in place prior commencing physical works on site. Organisations responsible such matters may include landowner, local government, community council, native title representative body, Department Environment & Conservation, Aboriginal Cultural Committee, Environmental Protection Authority, Department Consumer & Employment Protection and Department of 147 146 145 148 future expansion area airstrip 5 0 0 m s ewa ge po n d s b u f f er power station 500 m dri nk in g w ater bu ffe r 2 0 0 m pow er s ta tio n b u ff e r Ardyaloon clp 5 0 0 m d ri n k in g w ater b u ffe r Produced by Project Mapping Section, Mapping and GeoSpatial Data Branch, Department for Planning and Infrastructure, on behalf of the Western Australian Planning Commission, Perth, WA August 2007 50 0 m d r i nking w a te r b uffer Gumbarnun clp Current protection measures Aboriginal communities Water quality issues GASCOYNE JUNCTION 2-2000 1-2000 K I LLILI R D C A R N A R VO N - M U LLEW A R D GASCOYNE RIVER P1 P2 P1 Bore Bore Bore Bore drinkingwater.water.wa.gov.au Report for the Minister for Water Resources on Water Services in Discrete Indigenous Communities Bilateral Agreement on Indigenous Affairs (2006 – 2010) Report for the Minister for Water Resources on Water Services in Discrete Indigenous Communities December 2006 A detailed explanation of all elements of drinking water source protection can be obtained via our website Location Communities are located within nine main regions shown on the Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander Commission (ATSIC) map. Most indigenous people live in the mid-sized to large communities with populations greater than 50. Western Desert (Warburton) region characterised by low rainfall and high evaporation partly underlain by hard fractured rocks; groundwater is difficult to locate, and naturally-occurring nitrate can affect quality area extending into the Great Sandy Desert is underlain by sediments where water quality and quantity is variable some supplies occur in thin, calcrete drainages where shallow groundwater occurs in interconnected cavities these aquifers often contain naturally occurring nitrate, but are also prone to contamination community populations: <50 = 15%; 50-199 = 74%; and >200 = 11% South Hedland (Ngardi Ngarli Yarndu) Region and Geraldton (Yamatji) Region high rainfall deficit, and away from well- fractured recharge areas, the groundwater is generally saline community populations in South Hedland region: <50 = 69%; 50-199 = 26%; and >200 = 5% community populations in Geraldton region: <50 = 67%; 50-199 = 33%; and >200 = 0% Yiyili Bardi Bidyadanga Yulga Jinna Southwest (Country Noongar) Region and Metropolitan (Perth Noongar) highly variable rainfall and evaporation area to the west is underlain by the Perth Basin, and to the east by the Archaean Yilgarn Craton most of the communities are underlain by the latter or are on scheme water in Perth inland water supplies are obtained from deeply weathered bedrock where the water quality can be poor and often brackish to saline community populations in Southwest region: <50 = 100%; 50-199 = 0%; and >200 = 0% community populations in Metropolitan region: <50 = 67%; 50-199 = 33%; and >200 = 0%
Transcript
Page 1: K.J. Ketteringham, A.T. Laws, J. Brown, D. Collard, N.I ...water.wa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/3753/Poster-Quality-of... · • This proposal will improve essential service

Quality of drinking water supplied to Aboriginal communities – Western Australia: causes, implications and protection measures.

Some 300 communities are home to about 17 000 people. Of these:

about 45 are Aboriginal town-based communities •(ATBC)

about 20 Remote Area Essential Services Program •(RAESP) communities have a population over 200, with Bidyadanga the largest with 850

about 91 are remote communities with •populations exceeding 50, and serviced through the Remote Area Essential Services Program (RAESP)

the remaining discrete communities have a •population less than 50, and are generally located in remote areas of the state

The poster describes the current and proposed models for the provision of drinking water to this diverse range of Aboriginal communities.

K.J. Ketteringham, A.T. Laws, J. Brown, D. Collard, N.I. Brooks & N.P. Mantle

Looking after all our water needs

Remote Area Essential Services Program (RAESP)

A joint federal/state program managed by the Department of Housing and Works has delivered and maintained water, power and wastewater services since 1997 through contracted state program managers (CSPM).

RAESP measures currently include:

hydrogeological investigations and •drilling

development of water source •protection and management plans (20 to date).

Advisory Committee for the Purity of Water (ACPOW) measures include:

review of monthly water analyses •from the CSPM in line with the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines.

Concerns for remote communities:

the lack of water source protection •for many small, and the more remote, non-RAESP communities

variation between the modes of water •service delivery.

Variations:

Communities close to a town usually •receive town-supplied services to the community boundary, but the communities are responsible for infrastructure within the community. Emergency breakdowns are supported through the Town Reserves Regularisation Program managed by Department of Housing and Works.

For remote communities managed •under RAESP, and regional service providers, the CSPM is responsible for infrastructure, monitoring and treating water supplies, and conducting emergency repairs.

The water and wastewater services •for communities < 50 people used to be supported through ATSIC. While they now receive support for emergency repairs of infrastructure through RAESP, water quality is not frequently monitored.

Community layout plans (CLP) and future protection measures

Community drinking water source areas (CDWSA) for non town-based, remote communities are protected through various protection measures.

Some already have water source •protection and management plans prepared under the RAESP program, which can be incorporated into CLP developed by Department for Planning and Infrastructure (DPI).

DPI is developing and reviewing CLP •for remote communities not already covered by a town planning scheme.

CLP development involves community •and government stakeholders.

A buffers policy being developed by •DPI will include protection zones around drinking water sources.

Protection measures will be enhanced •in line with a new water services delivery model currently being considered.

Some communities experience water •quality problems associated with regional groundwater quality issues – nitrate, uranium, arsenic and heavy metals have been detected at levels that require treatment to meet the ADWG.

In larger RAESP communities, health-•related issues are being resolved by treatment, but for some smaller communities drinking water is being carted in.

Contamination of water sources can be •caused by community infrastructure (e.g. location of wastewater disposal and power stations adjacent to water bores). When community development occurs upstream of the water source bores contamination risk is increased.

Small community supplies are not •frequently tested for water quality. This issue is being considered in the new service delivery model.

Cultural issues:

Aboriginal heritage areas and culturally •sensitive sites (e.g. birthing places, ceremonial areas, men’s and women’s areas) require protection. These sites can limit or assist the opportunity to safely locate bores.

Wild camels in the Western Desert region damage water infrastructure and contaminate borefields (Source: Nadelle Brooks 10/04/05).

Bores located close to a community increases the water contamination risks (Source: Nadelle Brooks 9/04/05)

(Source: Tourism WA 27/11/07)

(Source: Tourism WA 27/11/07)

The way forwardWater sources for town-based communities •are protected through the existing Drinking Water Source Protection Plans (DWSPP) for each town’s Public Drinking Water Source Area (PDSWA).

Proclamation of PDWSA under the •Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947 enables by-laws to be applied to prevent contamination.

Priority areas, protection zones and land-•use planning ensure that source protection is achieved.

Below is an example of a DWSPP developed by the Department of Water for a small town. This approach could be applied to Aboriginal communities.

Essential services delivery model

The Department of Water is working with •other government agencies to improve water services to Aboriginal communities through a single service delivery model appropriate for the nature and remoteness of the various communities.

This proposal will improve essential service •provision to Aboriginal communities in the state, and bring them up to the same standard as for comparable ‘mainstream’ towns.

Conclusion

The delivery of a good quality water supply and its protection for most Aboriginal communities in Western Australia is currently under review. A new model is being developed to improve water source protection and water services for Aboriginal communities.

A community layout plan for Bardi (Ardyaloon) (Source: www.wapc.wa.gov.au 29/10/07).

N

Data Source - ATSIC Boundaries-AUSLIG

0 100 200

km

KULLARIBroome

WUNANKununurra

MALARABAHDerby

WESTERN DESERTWarburton

NGARDA NGARLI YARNDUSouth Hedland

YAMATJIGeraldton

PERTH NOONGAR

Perth

MULGA MALLEEKalgoorlie

NOONGAR COUNTRYPerth

Last update: June 2004

Albany

Boddington

Bridgetown

Broome

Busselton

Carnarvon

Collie

Cue

Dalwallinu

Denham

Derby

Dongara

Esperance

Exmouth

Fitzroy Crossing

Fremantle

Geraldton

Gnowangerup

Halls Creek

Kalbarri

Karratha

Katanning

Kellerberrin

Kununurra

Lake Grace

Laverton

Leinster

Leonora

Marble Bar

Margaret River

Meekatharra

Merredin

Moora

Morawa

Mount Magnet

Mukinbudin

Mullewa

Nannup

Narrogin

Newman

Norseman

Northam

Onslow Pannawonica

Paraburdoo

Pemberton

Pinjarra

Port Hedland

Quairading

Ravensthorpe

Southern Cross

Tom Price

Wiluna

Wyalkatchem

Wyndham

Yalgoo

PERTH

Kalgoorlie

Nullagine

Bunbury

Mandurah

N

Data Source - ATSIC Boundaries-AUSLIG

0 100 200

km

KULLARIBroome

WUNANKununurra

MALARABAHDerby

WESTERN DESERTWarburton

NGARDA NGARLI YARNDUSouth Hedland

YAMATJIGeraldton

PERTH NOONGAR

Perth

MULGA MALLEEKalgoorlie

NOONGAR COUNTRYPerth

Last update: June 2004

Albany

Boddington

Bridgetown

Broome

Busselton

Carnarvon

Collie

Cue

Dalwallinu

Denham

Derby

Dongara

Esperance

Exmouth

Fitzroy Crossing

Fremantle

Geraldton

Gnowangerup

Halls Creek

Kalbarri

Karratha

Katanning

Kellerberrin

Kununurra

Lake Grace

Laverton

Leinster

Leonora

Marble Bar

Margaret River

Meekatharra

Merredin

Moora

Morawa

Mount Magnet

Mukinbudin

Mullewa

Nannup

Narrogin

Newman

Norseman

Northam

Onslow Pannawonica

Paraburdoo

Pemberton

Pinjarra

Port Hedland

Quairading

Ravensthorpe

Southern Cross

Tom Price

Wiluna

Wyalkatchem

Wyndham

Yalgoo

PERTH

Kalgoorlie

Nullagine

Bunbury

Mandurah

Western Australia ATSIC Regions (Source: www.dia.wa.gov.au 29/10/07)

A typical small remote community (Source: Department of Water 05/11/07)

A typical medium sized remote community (Source: Department of Water 05/11/07)

A typical large remote community(Source: Department of Water 05/11/07)

Wongatha (Mulga Mallee) Regionhighrainfalldeficitandpoorrecharge•

groundwater is limited and of poor quality •in fractured rocks, except where there is local recharge, but can often be found in calcrete drainages, where it is prone to contaminationcommunity populations: <50 = 22%; 50-199 •= 78%; and >200 = 0%

Kununurra (Wunan) Region location of bores dependent on highly fractured •zones water supplies limited and subject to dewatering •when recharge fails southern communities often have brackish/saline •waterduetofine-grainedsedimentsandlackofregular rechargecommunity populations: <50 = 69%; 50-199 = 20%; •and >200 = 11% Derby (Malarabah) Region

water is sourced from sandstone aquifers •

someyieldgoodqualitywater,butothersarefiner•grained, with shale interbeds, and can have lower yields and higher salinities north of Derby older sediments and fractured granites •and volcanics yield limited supplies of variable quality water restricted to fracture zones and bedding planescommunity populations: <50 = 59%; 50-199 = 35%; and •>200 = 6%

Broome (Kullari) Region Water quality from sandstone aquifers is •generally potable. Coastal community supplies can be affected by •saline intrusion andcareful management of pumping is required.•

community populations: <50 = 85%; 50-199 = 10%; •and >200 = 5%

4

1110

6

0

m etres

N

A s-constructed de ta il supp lied by S inc la irK n igh t M erz

B ase in fo rm ation supp lied by the W esternA ustra lian Land In fo rm ation A uthority ,G L248-2007-2

100 200 300 400 500

Z :\p ro jects \country_p lann ing \pacp \B ard i\C LP _B ard i_context_A 3z51_10A ug07.dgnC LP derived from B ard iD ra ft C om m unity Layout P lan as supp liedby H G M

visitors ’ beachaccess boat ram p

visitors ’lookout

m ain visitors’ beachaccess

visitors’ beachaccess

w atercom pound

transform ershed

rocky area

disused

sew ageponds

11

O N E

A R M

R O AD

P O IN T

O N EA R M P O IN T R O A D

daoR euqeveL epaC emoorBmk 9 xorppa

C row n R eserve 20 927A boriginal Lands T rust

5 152.77 ha

Lot 89

C row n R eserve 20 927A boriginal Lands T rust

5 152.77 ha

Lot 89

858.59 haLot 215

Indian O cean

tree

N o go a rea

fence

L eg en d

industria l

fu tu re res iden tia l

com m unity

open space /recrea tion

sta ff res iden tia l

open space / bush

road reserve

business /com m erc ia l

pub lic u tility

d ra inage

exis ting res iden tia l

pedestrian access

road

gate

Planning for Aboriginal Communities

P

track

boundary of land under A boriginalcom m unity act 1979

landm ark a reaboundary

contour

ridge line o r levee

w ater p ipe

phone boxTe ls tra cab le

e lectrica l cab lepow er po le

sew er p ipe

bore

pum pP

P

exis ting cadastre

12 fu tu re layou t andLot no .

140

N O T E : T h is C L P d o es n o t co n stitu te d evelo p m en t ap p ro valre levant

tofo r

incorpora tedo f

M ateria lso f

W ater

It is the responsib ility o f the deve loper to ensure tha t a llconsents, approva ls , licences and c learances a re in p lace p rio rcom m encing phys ica l w orks on s ite . O rgan isa tions responsib lesuch m atte rs m ay inc lude landow ner, loca l governm ent,com m unity council, na tive title representa tive body, D epartm entE nvironm ent & C onserva tion , A borig ina l C u ltu ra lC om m ittee , E nvironm enta l P ro tection A u thority , D epartm entC onsum er & E m ploym ent P ro tection and D epartm ent o f

147

146

145

148

Ardyaloon - context and surrounds as at 10 August 2007

future expansion area

airstrip

500 m sewage ponds buffer

pow erstation

500 m drinking water buffer

200 mpower s tation buffer

Ardyaloon clp

500 m drinking water buffer

P roduced by P ro ject M app ing S ection ,M app ing and G eoS patia l D a ta B ranch ,D epartm ent fo r P lann ing and In frastructu re ,on beha lf o f the W estern A ustra lian P lann ingC om m iss ion , P erth , W A A ugust 2007

500 mdrinking wa ter buffer

Gumbarnun clp

Current protection measures

Aboriginal communities

Water quality issues

GASCOYNE JUNCTION

2-2000

1-2000

J:/Project/B_Series/B2010/0031/GascoyneJunctionFig4_A4.mxd

FIGURE 4. GASCOYNE JUNCTIONWATER RESERVE PRIORITY

CLASSIFICATIONS ANDPROTECTION ZONES

Drawn by: M.Webb Date 27/06/2007

Water Resource ManagementWater Source Protection Branch

INDEX TO ADJOINING1:100000

MAPS

LOCATION PLAN

WA

SOURCE DATADoW acknowledges the following datasets andtheir Custodians in the production of this map:Dataset Name - Custodian Acronym - Metadata datePDWSA - DOW - Feb 2006Rivers - DOW - July 2006WA Coastline - WRC - 13.10.2000Cadastre Land Tenure - DLI - Dec 2006

20481848

20471847

20461846

Gascoyne Junction

Perth

Coordinate System MGA94 Zone 50

1948

1947

1946

0 75 150 225 300

Meters

Legend

Gazetted Water Reserve

Proposed Water Reserve

Priority One Classification (P1)

Priority Two Classification (P2)

Wellhead Protection zone

Major drainage

Water Corporation Production Bores

KIL

LILI

RD

CARNARVON-MULLEWA RD

GASCOYNE RIVER

P1

P2

P1

BoreBore

BoreBore

drinkingwater.water.wa.gov.au Report for the Minister for Water Resources on

Water Services in Discrete Indigenous Communities

Bilateral Agreement on Indigenous Affairs (2006 – 2010)

Report for the Minister for Water

Resources on Water Services in

Discrete Indigenous Communities

December 2006 A detailed explanation of all elements of drinking water source protection can be obtained via our website

LocationCommunities are located within nine •main regions shown on the Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander Commission (ATSIC) map.

Most indigenous •people live in the mid-sized to large communities with populations greater than 50.

Western Desert (Warburton) region characterised by low rainfall and high •evaporation partly underlain by hard fractured rocks; •groundwaterisdifficulttolocate,andnaturally-occurring nitrate can affect quality area extending into the Great Sandy •Desert is underlain by sediments where water quality and quantity is variable some supplies occur in thin, calcrete •drainages where shallow groundwater occurs in interconnected cavities these aquifers often contain naturally •occurring nitrate, but are also prone to contaminationcommunity populations: <50 = 15%; 50-199 •= 74%; and >200 = 11%

South Hedland (Ngardi Ngarli Yarndu) Region and Geraldton (Yamatji) Region

highrainfalldeficit,andawayfromwell-•fractured recharge areas, the groundwater is generally salinecommunity populations in South Hedland •region: <50 = 69%; 50-199 = 26%; and >200 = 5% community populations in Geraldton region: •<50 = 67%; 50-199 = 33%; and >200 = 0%

Yiyili

Bardi

Bidyadanga

Yulga Jinna

Southwest (Country Noongar) Region and Metropolitan (Perth Noongar)

highly variable rainfall and evaporation•

area to the west is underlain by the Perth Basin, •and to the east by the Archaean Yilgarn Craton most of the communities are underlain by the •latter or are on scheme water in Perth inland water supplies are obtained from deeply •weathered bedrock where the water quality can be poor and often brackish to salinecommunity populations in Southwest region: •<50 = 100%; 50-199 = 0%; and >200 = 0% community populations in Metropolitan region: • <50 = 67%; 50-199 = 33%; and >200 = 0%

Recommended