+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Knowledge Tree July 2012

Knowledge Tree July 2012

Date post: 04-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: praveen-kr
View: 220 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 11

Transcript
  • 8/13/2019 Knowledge Tree July 2012

    1/11

    Contents...

    Volume5Issue 7

    July 2012

    ditors Note 2P osters . 3T opic .5

    T echtoon .9P uzzle10W inners11

    International

    Friendship dayuru Purnima

    24th July

    Civil Engineering Magazine

  • 8/13/2019 Knowledge Tree July 2012

    2/11

    Dear ReadersWe are much obliged withyour responses and happy to be a part ofthis initiative.India is a land of agriculture & the workforce we use in the construction eld most-ly originates from here.

    In construction industry we have many is-sues that creates bottle necks in achieving

    required productivity & Quality.

    Some of them are

    Un educated & Un trained work force

    Non availability of same person

    throughout the duration of the project

    We in L&T have taken up major initiatives

    in training & developing the rural workers

    through Construction skill training insti-

    tutes ( CSTI ).

    Still there is a large gap in the demand Vs

    Supply of the qualied work force.

    This gap cannot be fullled easily in thenear future.

    Meanwhile our works are suering in Qual-

    ity & productivity.

    In order to tackle this issue , we have to ana-

    lyse the problem & frame a system to tacklethe issue now!

    Our problem is in front of us we can ensure

    the self regulation.

    We don't have trained skilled or experi-

    enced skilled work force.

    Many sites have taken up the issue & estab-

    lished screening , training & encouraging

    mechanisms.

    Even if the worker is trained at site in par-

    ticular activity say concreting or masonry ,

    there is no guarantee that he will continue

    for considerable amount of time.

    Hence the site engineers & supervisors jobis getting compounded day be day and he is

    spending major portion of his time in con-

    trolling the work force & rectifying the de-

    fects they generated through the work.

    It is established fact that Awareness is the

    key to Improvement .

    PT&D ICCivil Engineering departmentbelieves in this concept & had initiated rst

    of its kind step to bring in awareness in the

    workers on continuous basis.

    Series of posters on workmanship require-

    ments were prepared in English , Hindi &

    other vernacular languages. This eort is

    rst of its kind in construction industry .

    Several day to day activities are made in to

    Posters and simple language is used to ex-

    T S R B a n g a r R a j u K.Satish Varma

    d i t o r s N o t e

  • 8/13/2019 Knowledge Tree July 2012

    3/11

    plain along with appropriate pictures.

    As pictures are worth a million words .,

    this concept is the foundation for this de-velopment. These posters were deployed in

    pilot project sites of PT&D and that the

    same was well received by sta and workers.

    These posters are displayed at prominent

    places especially in the assembly area and

    work spots.

    Along with this , the eectiveness could bemultifold if PEPTALK is included on the

    work methods on daily basis.

    Few minutes with the workers in the begin-

    ning of every day can bring dramatic

    change in their ability to transform to a pro-

    ductive workforce.

    We have experienced the power of pep talk

    in many walks of our life , right from the as-

    sembly sessions in our school to safety pep

    talks at our work place.

    Hence this can bring a change in workers

    mindset & prompt them to adhere to our

    standards as time passes by.

    This brings in a silent revolution on work-

    manship improvement , workers develop-

    ment & thus Nation building.

    Let us join this movement & bring a change

    in our work place.

    We call this silent transformationbe a

    part of it.

    The posters are uploaded in the EIP -Vidya

    website. Click on the link given on page4

    for accessing.

    You can download the same & print it to A

    Zero size ex Boards and display themwhere needed & easily seen by all.

    We invite your suggestions to improve the

    content. Please write to us at

    [email protected] for improvisation.

    In this month, we have detailed on the ac-

    ceptance criteria of concrete in its real

    sense.

    We hope this topic will be of immense use

    to Quality Engineers & to all.

    We regret for the delay in publishing the

    Knowledge TreeJuly Issue.

    This month is having few important events.

    1st

    July is observed as Doctors day in India .24thJulyis observed as Guru Purnima

    30th July is observed as International

    Friendship Day.

    d i t o r s N o t e

    Pep Talks

    Awareness

    generation

  • 8/13/2019 Knowledge Tree July 2012

    4/11

    Click Here

    to Down load

    the posters

    https://km.lntecc.com/ocs/epgo/Igp/PTDS/KT/default.aspxhttps://km.lntecc.com/ocs/epgo/Igp/PTDS/KT/default.aspxhttps://km.lntecc.com/ocs/epgo/Igp/PTDS/KT/default.aspxhttps://km.lntecc.com/ocs/epgo/Igp/PTDS/KT/default.aspxhttps://km.lntecc.com/ocs/epgo/Igp/PTDS/KT/default.aspxhttps://km.lntecc.com/ocs/epgo/Igp/PTDS/KT/default.aspxhttps://km.lntecc.com/ocs/epgo/Igp/PTDS/KT/default.aspx
  • 8/13/2019 Knowledge Tree July 2012

    5/11

    Concrete is a versatile material of the 21stcentury. It can be molded in to anyshape or size and can be made to suit torequirements.With the same ingredients and varying proportionwe can obtain dierent concrete grades. The grades

    of concrete is designated as M 20 or 25 or 30 Etc.

    The

    M-stands for Mix & the remaining part

    stands for the strength of the concrete in N/mm2.

    Concrete is stronger in Compression & weaker in

    Tensionit is a known fact to all. But the strength

    is obtained in concrete with

    Careful selection of ingredients Carrying Mix design for xing the propor-

    tions to suit to the sources. Following strict Quality control measures

    during production. Ensuring proper sampling techniques

    Careful curing of the member

    Several Quality control measures have to be takenfor ensuring good Product which satises the stand-

    ards or specications of the project.

    Dierent countries have dierent criteria's for ac-

    cepting concrete.

    In India we follow

    IS 4562000 with Amendment3 for deciding

    the acceptance of concrete.

    Where specication demands we may have to

    adopt those requirements. For example , for

    railways Jobs we use RVNL(Rail Vikas Nigam

    Limited ) specication criteria.

    For National Highway / Road Jobs we use

    MORTH ( Ministry of Road Transport & High-

    ways ) specication.

    Where as internationally many standard have theirown criteria's for the concrete acceptance.

    British standard sets criteria in BS 8110 .

    Accep

    tancecrit

    eriaof

    concrete

  • 8/13/2019 Knowledge Tree July 2012

    6/11

    These criteria's are important in deciding the ac-

    ceptability of concrete grade.

    Many people believe & presume that when a cube is

    failed the concrete is failed. But it is not so.

    Many factors eects the concrete cube casting & the

    subsequent test there on.

    The following are the general issues that takes place

    in concrete cube failure.

    Inbuilt factors : ( Factors that aect concrete

    quality & strength ) Incorrect selection of material for concrete use

    Improper quality control mechanism adopted

    for material tests.

    Non adherence to Mix design requirements

    Improper Batch plant which is out of calibration

    & defective.

    Un controlled addition of water

    Factors that doesn't aect the concrete quality

    but reduces the cube strength:

    Sampling defects

    Curing inadequacy of the cubes

    Cube mould disguring / out of size & Shape

    Calibration defects of testing machine.

    Technicians skill or training inadequacy

    Incorrect placement of cubes in the machine &

    loading defects

    So Standard has set criteria for acceptance of con-

    crete taking in to the above possible errors in to

    consideration.

    The errors that are inbuilt factors produce defective

    concrete , where as for the other factors as men-

    tioned above the concrete is not defective. But the

    sampling , testing mechanism & methods are defec-

    tive.

    In order to know whether the concrete poured ispassing or failing the required grade we must not

    rely on a single cube , rather on set of cubes that

    represents the complete pour.

    If one cube from a complete set gets less strength

    than the required grade we must not label it as fail-

    ure.

    The following both criteria must be satised to ac-

    cept the concrete grade.

    Primarily the concrete can be accepted or rejected

    based on the grade of it or as per Table2 of IS 456.

    However to evaluate the concrete grade statistically

    we must satisfy the following criteria from IS 456

    2000section 16.1

    The individual cube result shall not be less than

    fck3 N/mm2.

    The average determined from any group of 4

    consecutive non overlapping test results shall

    not be less than fck+3 N/mm2

    To understand better , let us consider the cube test

    results of M25 grade concrete cast on a given day .

    250 m3 of concrete was cast at a site & 9 samples

    were taken ( 3 specimens per sample )the results are

    as given in the following table.

    First check whether all the samples are having

    strength more or equal to FckIn this case two

    specimens found to have less than Fckvalue of 25

  • 8/13/2019 Knowledge Tree July 2012

    7/11

    N/mm2.

    Though the sample strength is less than specied

    grade ( 25 N/mm2 ) we cant reject the concrete

    right away. But we need to verify the Acceptance

    criteria per Section 16.1.

    2. Second check whether the individual specimen

    diers from average of the 3 specimens in the

    sample. If there is a variation more than 15%

    then that sample shall be rejected or not to be

    taken in to consideration for acceptance criteria.

    ( it doesn't mean that the concrete representing

    the sample is rejected )

    3. Check whether any individual specimen is less

    than Fck3. In our illustration, none of them are

    less than the same.

    4. Then arrange the samples ( average of 3 speci-

    mens ) in groups of 4 ( with out using the same

    sample again ).

    5. Take the average of the 4 samples. (consecutive

    non overlapping sample results ). Out of the ver-

    ication , even if any one sample passes the Fck

    +3 requirement along with check on step4 ,

    the concrete grade is accepted.

    Final Result : As both the criteria's are met , the

    grade is accepted.

    For all the above purposes the frequency of concrete

    cube casting as mentioned in IS 456Section 15.2.2

    must be followed.

    In case the frequency of sampling is not mentioned

    in the specication or in tender , then the maxi-

    mum concrete that 4 consecutive test results repre-

    sents must be limited to 60m3.

    This means when concrete is carried in small batch-

    es , then to evaluate the grade of concrete , the total

    quantity of all such concretes must not exceed

    60m3. ( this concrete may be carried in same day or

    in 2 or 3 days ).

    In order to ensure that such low strength doesn'tarise , we need to check the sampling methods

    adopted & correct them where necessary.

    If the result doesn't satisfy the above requirements

    27 4%

    Sample -1 28 26.00 8%

    23 -12%

    29 1%

    Sample -2 27 28.67 -6%

    30 5%

    28.42

    29 -1%

    Sample -3 30 29.33 2%

    29 -1%

    28 -6%

    Sample -4 29 29.67 -2%

    32 8%

    30 7%

    Sample -5 29 28.00 4%

    25 -11%

    25 -7%

    Sample -6 29 27.00 7%

    27 0%

    28.83

    29 -1%Sample -7 29 29.33 -1%

    30 2%

    31 0%

    Sample -8 33 31.00 6%

    29 -6%

    22 -21%

    Sample -9 30 28.00 7%

    32 14%

    This result is higher

    than 15% hence

    invalid

    Criteria -1

    Mean of 4

    consecutiv

    e non

    overlappin

    g test

    results >

    25 + 3 =

    28

    No

    individual

    test

    specimen

    shall be

    less than

    25 - 3 = 22

    Deviation

    from MeanAverage

    Mean of 4

    consecutive

    samples

    Strength

    in N/mm2

    Sample results Evaluationfor Concrete

  • 8/13/2019 Knowledge Tree July 2012

    8/11

    then further investigation need to be carried using

    NDT techniques .

    For the railway projects in India the acceptance

    criteria is applied as below:For the rst 5 sets

    The average strength determined from any

    group of the three consecutive test cubes ex-

    ceeds the specied characteristic strength +o.6X

    current margin

    Only one individual test cube in any set may be

    below 0.95X specied characteristic strength

    After 5 sets

    The average strength of any 15 consecutive cubes

    exceeds the specic characteristic cube strength +0.9 X current margin

    All the subsequent results are accepted if

    The average strength of any group of three con-

    secutive test cubes exceeds the specied charac-

    teristic strength + 0.6 X current margin.

    Only one individual cube test result in any set

    may fail below the specied characteristic

    strength provided that his value is not less than

    0.9 X characteristic strength.

    Current margin for all grades is 9.

    As per MORTH specication , concrete grade is

    accepted only when both the conditions are

    met. The mean strength determined from any group

    of four consecutive samples exceed specied

    characteristic strength

    Strength of any sample is not less than the speci-

    ed characteristic compressive strength3 N/

    mm2.

  • 8/13/2019 Knowledge Tree July 2012

    9/11

  • 8/13/2019 Knowledge Tree July 2012

    10/11

    Across

    3. CARRIED TO PROMOTE HYDRATION OF

    CEMENT

    5. VERSATILE MATERIAL IN CONSTRUC-

    TION

    8. ENSURES REPRESENTETIVE IS EQUAL

    TO BULK

    9. LOSING SHAPE OR SIZE

    10. STANDS FOR M IN GRADE OF CON-CRETE

    Down

    1. INHERENT CHARECTER OF THE MATE-

    RIAL

    2. ONE OF THE INGREDIENT IN CON-

    CRETE THAT IS NON REACTIVE

    4. NEEDED TO USE A MACHINE OR CARRY

    A TEST

    5. BINDING MATERIAL IN CONCRETE

    6. NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OFINDIA

    7. CARRIED TO CHECK EQUIPMENTS AC-

    CURACY/ DEPENDENCY

    Find the

    words

    Mail to

    [email protected]

    July

    Jewel

  • 8/13/2019 Knowledge Tree July 2012

    11/11

    Disclaimer :No part of this publication shall be reproduced without the written permission from the Editors. The views

    expressed here need not be the views of the L&T Construction L&T doesn't take any responsibility of what so ever for the views expressed by the Editors / Authors This is for the

    S.Manikandan

    S Ramya Sri

    Sankaran

    Roshan

    G Anitha Nivashini

    D Pavan

    Choudary K

    Rajith Kumar

    K Praveen

    Bharat T

    Ujwal Kumar


Recommended