KTC

KTCKTCKTCKTC

Sung Il JeanSung Il Jean

20011201442001120144

Sung Il JeanSung Il Jean

20011201442001120144

Korea Tripartite CommissionKorea Tripartite Commission

OverviewOverviewOverviewOverview

IntroductionIntroduction

Evaluation of KTCEvaluation of KTC

European ModelEuropean Model

RecommendationsRecommendations





OverviewOverviewOverviewOverview









1. What is KTC?

2. IMF’s Conditionality?

3. The Goal of KTC

4. Structure of KTC

5. KTC Description (how?)

6. KTC Description (what?)

7. Chronicles of KTC

8. 1998-2000

1. What is KTC?

2. IMF’s Conditionality?

3. The Goal of KTC

4. Structure of KTC

5. KTC Description (how?)

6. KTC Description (what?)

7. Chronicles of KTC

8. 1998-2000

What is KTC?What is KTC?What is KTC?What is KTC?KTC:KTC:


Labor, Management, and GovernmentLabor, Management, and Government

a result of IMFa result of IMF

KTC:KTC:


Labor, Management, and GovernmentLabor, Management, and Government

a result of IMFa result of IMF

IMF’s Conditionality ?IMF’s Conditionality ?IMF’s Conditionality ?IMF’s Conditionality ?Flexible labor market:Flexible labor market:

Allowance of layoffAllowance of layoff

Dispatch labor systemDispatch labor system

President Kim Dae Jung:President Kim Dae Jung:

Overcoming of the Economic CrisisOvercoming of the Economic Crisis

Flexible labor market:Flexible labor market:

Allowance of layoffAllowance of layoff

Dispatch labor systemDispatch labor system

President Kim Dae Jung:President Kim Dae Jung:

Overcoming of the Economic CrisisOvercoming of the Economic Crisis

The Goal of KTCThe Goal of KTCThe Goal of KTCThe Goal of KTC

Realizing socialintegration

Realizing socialintegration

Balanced Development of the National EconomyBalanced Development of the National Economy

Reinforcing nationalcompetitiveness

Reinforcing nationalcompetitiveness

Realizing harmonious labor-management relationshipbased on participation and cooperation

Structure of KTCStructure of KTCStructure of KTCStructure of KTC

KTC Description (how?)KTC Description (how?)KTC Description (how?)KTC Description (how?)

Proposal and SubmittalProposal and Submittal

DeliberationDeliberation

DecisionDecision Committee meetingCommittee meeting

Sub/Special CommitteeSub/Special Committee

Standing CommitteeStanding Committee

Plenary CommitteePlenary Committee

KTC Description (what?)KTC Description (what?)KTC Description (what?)KTC Description (what?)

PeriodPeriod AgendasAgendas

11stst 1/15/1998 1/15/1998

~ 2/9/1998~ 2/9/1998

Labor Market FlexibilityLabor Market Flexibility,,Labor Rights, Welfare, Labor Rights, Welfare, Chaebol ReformChaebol Reform

22ndnd 6/3/1998 6/3/1998

~ 8/31/1999~ 8/31/1999

RestructuringRestructuring, Welfare,, Welfare,Labor RightsLabor Rights

33rdrd 9/1/19999/1/1999

~ present~ present

Restructuring, Welfare,Restructuring, Welfare,Workweek, Workweek, Labor RelationsLabor Relations


Establishment of KTCEstablishment of KTC

The Second-Phase of KTCThe Second-Phase of KTC

Reduction of Working HoursReduction of Working Hours

The Third-Phase KTCThe Third-Phase KTC

Five-year postponement of multiple trade unions


Protection of Non-standard Workers


Member of IAESCSIMember of IAESCSI

Social Pact for Job CreationSocial Pact for Job Creation

12/26/9712/26/97

06/03/9806/03/98

09/01/9909/01/99

10/23/0010/23/00

02/09/0102/09/01

07/22/0207/22/02

06/25/0306/25/03

02/10/0402/10/04

Chronicles of KTCChronicles of KTCChronicles of KTCChronicles of KTC


Establishment of KTCEstablishment of KTC

The Second-Phase of KTCThe Second-Phase of KTC

Reduction of Working HoursReduction of Working Hours

The Third-Phase KTCThe Third-Phase KTC





Member of IAESCSIMember of IAESCSI

Social Pact for Job CreationSocial Pact for Job Creation

12/26/9712/26/97

06/03/9806/03/98

09/01/9909/01/99

10/23/0010/23/00

02/09/0102/09/01

07/22/0207/22/02

06/25/0306/25/03

02/10/0402/10/04

KTC Description (what?) – 98~00KTC Description (what?) – 98~00KTC Description (what?) – 98~00KTC Description (what?) – 98~00

09/16/98 – 2.3% of FKTU satisfied with KTC 09/16/98 – 2.3% of FKTU satisfied with KTC

09/22/98 – Layoff in the banking sector?09/22/98 – Layoff in the banking sector? Resistance and Withdrawal Resistance and Withdrawal

02/24/99 – KCTU leaves KTC02/24/99 – KCTU leaves KTC

03/17/99 – Directly with the government03/17/99 – Directly with the government

03/29/99 – Restructuring? No03/29/99 – Restructuring? No Reduce working hours? Yes Reduce working hours? Yes

09/16/98 – 2.3% of FKTU satisfied with KTC 09/16/98 – 2.3% of FKTU satisfied with KTC

09/22/98 – Layoff in the banking sector?09/22/98 – Layoff in the banking sector? Resistance and Withdrawal Resistance and Withdrawal

02/24/99 – KCTU leaves KTC02/24/99 – KCTU leaves KTC

03/17/99 – Directly with the government03/17/99 – Directly with the government

03/29/99 – Restructuring? No03/29/99 – Restructuring? No Reduce working hours? Yes Reduce working hours? Yes


04/16/99 – Only Government? Tripartite?04/16/99 – Only Government? Tripartite?

06/25/99 – Kim Dae Jung meets two leaders06/25/99 – Kim Dae Jung meets two leaders

05/26/00 – Revised Labor Standard Act05/26/00 – Revised Labor Standard Act

07/07/00 – Labor & Government at Banker’s07/07/00 – Labor & Government at Banker’s

10/24/00 – Work hours to 40 10/24/00 – Work hours to 40 → → OKOK

04/16/99 – Only Government? Tripartite?04/16/99 – Only Government? Tripartite?

06/25/99 – Kim Dae Jung meets two leaders06/25/99 – Kim Dae Jung meets two leaders

05/26/00 – Revised Labor Standard Act05/26/00 – Revised Labor Standard Act

07/07/00 – Labor & Government at Banker’s07/07/00 – Labor & Government at Banker’s

10/24/00 – Work hours to 40 10/24/00 – Work hours to 40 → → OKOK


11/10/00 – Functioning well? No discussions11/10/00 – Functioning well? No discussions

11/11/00 – FKTU withdrew from KTC11/11/00 – FKTU withdrew from KTC

11/14/00 – No reduction in salary11/14/00 – No reduction in salary

12/12/00 – FKTU returns12/12/00 – FKTU returns

12/23/00 – Any will to reform?12/23/00 – Any will to reform?

11/10/00 – Functioning well? No discussions11/10/00 – Functioning well? No discussions

11/11/00 – FKTU withdrew from KTC11/11/00 – FKTU withdrew from KTC

11/14/00 – No reduction in salary11/14/00 – No reduction in salary

12/12/00 – FKTU returns12/12/00 – FKTU returns

12/23/00 – Any will to reform?12/23/00 – Any will to reform?

OverviewOverview



European CaseEuropean Case


Evaluation of KTC -1Evaluation of KTC -1Evaluation of KTC -1Evaluation of KTC -1

Social Agreement Social Agreement

– Needs of Macro-level agreementNeeds of Macro-level agreement

– guaranteeing the implementation of agreementguaranteeing the implementation of agreement

– Too many agendasToo many agendas

– Lack of trustLack of trust

Social Agreement Social Agreement

– Needs of Macro-level agreementNeeds of Macro-level agreement

– guaranteeing the implementation of agreementguaranteeing the implementation of agreement

– Too many agendasToo many agendas

– Lack of trustLack of trust


Reforms of Economy and PoliticsReforms of Economy and Politics

– Chaebol Reform Chaebol Reform

– Flexible Labor MarketFlexible Labor Market

– RestructuringRestructuring

– Improvement of Labor RightsImprovement of Labor Rights

Reforms of Economy and PoliticsReforms of Economy and Politics

– Chaebol Reform Chaebol Reform

– Flexible Labor MarketFlexible Labor Market

– RestructuringRestructuring

– Improvement of Labor RightsImprovement of Labor Rights


Structure and ProcedureStructure and Procedure

– KCTU’s withdrawal KCTU’s withdrawal

– Introducing of sub/special committees Introducing of sub/special committees

– Same Decision Making Process - unanimouslySame Decision Making Process - unanimously

– 95 out of 119, but not on important issues95 out of 119, but not on important issues

Structure and ProcedureStructure and Procedure

– KCTU’s withdrawal KCTU’s withdrawal

– Introducing of sub/special committees Introducing of sub/special committees

– Same Decision Making Process - unanimouslySame Decision Making Process - unanimously

– 95 out of 119, but not on important issues95 out of 119, but not on important issues

OverviewOverview





European CaseEuropean CaseEuropean CaseEuropean Case

Dutch Model:Dutch Model: SER – Problems on Politics / Labor SER – Problems on Politics / Labor

Increasing competitivenessIncreasing competitiveness– Restraint of Wage IncreaseRestraint of Wage Increase– Reduction of Unemployment Rate by Reduction of Unemployment Rate by

irregular workersirregular workers

Will it Work in Korea?Will it Work in Korea?– Hire More Irregular Workers?Hire More Irregular Workers?

Dutch Model:Dutch Model: SER – Problems on Politics / Labor SER – Problems on Politics / Labor

Increasing competitivenessIncreasing competitiveness– Restraint of Wage IncreaseRestraint of Wage Increase– Reduction of Unemployment Rate by Reduction of Unemployment Rate by

irregular workersirregular workers

Will it Work in Korea?Will it Work in Korea?– Hire More Irregular Workers?Hire More Irregular Workers?

LowValue-added

LowValue-added

LowWages

LowWages

Low Technology

Low Technology

European CaseEuropean CaseEuropean CaseEuropean Case

Dutch Model:Dutch Model: Why does it Work in Netherlands?Why does it Work in Netherlands?

– Equal Treatment of Regular and Irregular WorkersEqual Treatment of Regular and Irregular Workers– High percentage of Women High percentage of Women

If Dutch Model is implemented?If Dutch Model is implemented?– Unemployment Rate Unemployment Rate ↓↓, Irregular Workers , Irregular Workers ↑↑

What do Koreans want?What do Koreans want?– High Unemployment Rate of Youth High Unemployment Rate of Youth – Needs of the Unemployed Middle-agedNeeds of the Unemployed Middle-aged

Dutch Model:Dutch Model: Why does it Work in Netherlands?Why does it Work in Netherlands?

– Equal Treatment of Regular and Irregular WorkersEqual Treatment of Regular and Irregular Workers– High percentage of Women High percentage of Women

If Dutch Model is implemented?If Dutch Model is implemented?– Unemployment Rate Unemployment Rate ↓↓, Irregular Workers , Irregular Workers ↑↑

What do Koreans want?What do Koreans want?– High Unemployment Rate of Youth High Unemployment Rate of Youth – Needs of the Unemployed Middle-agedNeeds of the Unemployed Middle-aged

OverviewOverview





RecommendationsRecommendationsRecommendationsRecommendations

FunctionsFunctionsFunctionsFunctions

AgendasAgendas&&

Efficient OperationEfficient Operation

AgendasAgendas&&

Efficient OperationEfficient Operation

ReconstructionReconstruction&&

RolesRoles

ReconstructionReconstruction&&

RolesRoles

Recommendations -1Recommendations -1Recommendations -1Recommendations -1

Functions:Functions: Independence should be guaranteedIndependence should be guaranteed

– ExpertiseExpertise– Participation of Labor and Management Participation of Labor and Management

Carrying out agreementsCarrying out agreements– Government’s respect Government’s respect – TransparencyTransparency– Report to the presidentReport to the president

Functions:Functions: Independence should be guaranteedIndependence should be guaranteed

– ExpertiseExpertise– Participation of Labor and Management Participation of Labor and Management

Carrying out agreementsCarrying out agreements– Government’s respect Government’s respect – TransparencyTransparency– Report to the presidentReport to the president


Developing Agendas and Efficient Operation:Developing Agendas and Efficient Operation: Developing AgendasDeveloping Agendas

– Long-term & Macro AgendasLong-term & Macro Agendas

Efficient OperationEfficient Operation– Diversification of Decision MakingDiversification of Decision Making

Special Committee & MembersSpecial Committee & Members– Temporary use of Special Committee Temporary use of Special Committee – More specialistsMore specialists

Developing Agendas and Efficient Operation:Developing Agendas and Efficient Operation: Developing AgendasDeveloping Agendas

– Long-term & Macro AgendasLong-term & Macro Agendas

Efficient OperationEfficient Operation– Diversification of Decision MakingDiversification of Decision Making

Special Committee & MembersSpecial Committee & Members– Temporary use of Special Committee Temporary use of Special Committee – More specialistsMore specialists


Reconstruction and Roles to mediate and lead:Reconstruction and Roles to mediate and lead: Reconstruction through different RolesReconstruction through different Roles

– Sub Committee – specialistsSub Committee – specialists– Standing Committee – public interests Standing Committee – public interests – Plenary Committee – justice Plenary Committee – justice

Role Role – Members of Public Interests - mediationMembers of Public Interests - mediation– Specialists – leading roleSpecialists – leading role

Reconstruction and Roles to mediate and lead:Reconstruction and Roles to mediate and lead: Reconstruction through different RolesReconstruction through different Roles

– Sub Committee – specialistsSub Committee – specialists– Standing Committee – public interests Standing Committee – public interests – Plenary Committee – justice Plenary Committee – justice

Role Role – Members of Public Interests - mediationMembers of Public Interests - mediation– Specialists – leading roleSpecialists – leading role

ReferencesReferencesReferencesReferences

이동룡이동룡 (2002), (2002), 한국 노사관계의 현주소와 미래한국 노사관계의 현주소와 미래 , , 베스트셀러 베스트셀러 노사정위원회노사정위원회 (1998), (1998), 노사정위원회 활동현황노사정위원회 활동현황 , , 노사정위원회 노사정위원회 한국노동조합총연맹한국노동조합총연맹 (2003), ((2003), ( 언론보도로 본언론보도로 본 )) 노사정위원회 노사정위원회 66

년년 : 1998.1~2003.12, : 1998.1~2003.12, 노사정위원회 노사정위원회 노사정위원회노사정위원회 (2003), (2003), 노동쟁의 조정제도 및 쟁의문화 개선을 노동쟁의 조정제도 및 쟁의문화 개선을

위한 논의자료위한 논의자료 , , 노사정위원회 노사정위원회 노사정위원회노사정위원회 (2003), (2003), 노사협의회 활성화 관련 논의자료노사협의회 활성화 관련 논의자료 , ,

노사정위원회 노사정위원회 Korea Tripartite Commission(2003), Strategies to Develop the Korea Tripartite Commission(2003), Strategies to Develop the

Industrial Relations system in Korea, Korea Tripartite Industrial Relations system in Korea, Korea Tripartite CommissionCommission

이동룡이동룡 (2002), (2002), 한국 노사관계의 현주소와 미래한국 노사관계의 현주소와 미래 , , 베스트셀러 베스트셀러 노사정위원회노사정위원회 (1998), (1998), 노사정위원회 활동현황노사정위원회 활동현황 , , 노사정위원회 노사정위원회 한국노동조합총연맹한국노동조합총연맹 (2003), ((2003), ( 언론보도로 본언론보도로 본 )) 노사정위원회 노사정위원회 66

년년 : 1998.1~2003.12, : 1998.1~2003.12, 노사정위원회 노사정위원회 노사정위원회노사정위원회 (2003), (2003), 노동쟁의 조정제도 및 쟁의문화 개선을 노동쟁의 조정제도 및 쟁의문화 개선을

위한 논의자료위한 논의자료 , , 노사정위원회 노사정위원회 노사정위원회노사정위원회 (2003), (2003), 노사협의회 활성화 관련 논의자료노사협의회 활성화 관련 논의자료 , ,

노사정위원회 노사정위원회 Korea Tripartite Commission(2003), Strategies to Develop the Korea Tripartite Commission(2003), Strategies to Develop the

Industrial Relations system in Korea, Korea Tripartite Industrial Relations system in Korea, Korea Tripartite CommissionCommission


김훈김훈 (2002), (2002), 노사정위원회 활동평가 및 발전방안노사정위원회 활동평가 및 발전방안 , , 한국노동연구원 한국노동연구원 최성수최성수 (2000), (2000), 선진국 사회적 합의주의의 특성과 시사점선진국 사회적 합의주의의 특성과 시사점 , , 한국경제연구원 한국경제연구원 박성준박성준 (2004), 2004(2004), 2004 년 임년 임 ,, 단협의 현안과 쟁점단협의 현안과 쟁점 , , 한국경제연구 한국경제연구 권영순권영순 (2004), (2004), 노사정노사정 , ', ' 일자리 만들기 사회협약일자리 만들기 사회협약 ' ' 체결체결 , , 나라경제 나라경제 33 월호 월호 김영배김영배 (2004), (2004), 노사정간 역지사지 정신이 필요노사정간 역지사지 정신이 필요 , , 나라경제 나라경제 66 월 월 이철수이철수 (2004), (2004), 노사정안 기능노사정안 기능 , , 위상 제고해야위상 제고해야 , , 나라경제 나라경제 66 월호 월호 박성준박성준 , , 이승길이승길 (2004), (2004), 참여정부 노사관계법참여정부 노사관계법 , , 제도의 선진화 방안에 대한 제도의 선진화 방안에 대한

모색모색 , , 한국경제연구원 한국경제연구원 대한상공회의소대한상공회의소 (2004), (2004), 노사정위원회 제도의 문제점과 개선과제노사정위원회 제도의 문제점과 개선과제 , ,

대한상공회의소 대한상공회의소 Lim Hyun-Chin, Hwang Suk-Man, Chung Il-Joon(2000), IMF's Restructuring, Lim Hyun-Chin, Hwang Suk-Man, Chung Il-Joon(2000), IMF's Restructuring,

Development Strategy, and Labor Realignment in South Korea, Development Strategy, and Labor Realignment in South Korea, Development and SocietyDevelopment and Society

김훈김훈 (2002), (2002), 노사정위원회 활동평가 및 발전방안노사정위원회 활동평가 및 발전방안 , , 한국노동연구원 한국노동연구원 최성수최성수 (2000), (2000), 선진국 사회적 합의주의의 특성과 시사점선진국 사회적 합의주의의 특성과 시사점 , , 한국경제연구원 한국경제연구원 박성준박성준 (2004), 2004(2004), 2004 년 임년 임 ,, 단협의 현안과 쟁점단협의 현안과 쟁점 , , 한국경제연구 한국경제연구 권영순권영순 (2004), (2004), 노사정노사정 , ', ' 일자리 만들기 사회협약일자리 만들기 사회협약 ' ' 체결체결 , , 나라경제 나라경제 33 월호 월호 김영배김영배 (2004), (2004), 노사정간 역지사지 정신이 필요노사정간 역지사지 정신이 필요 , , 나라경제 나라경제 66 월 월 이철수이철수 (2004), (2004), 노사정안 기능노사정안 기능 , , 위상 제고해야위상 제고해야 , , 나라경제 나라경제 66 월호 월호 박성준박성준 , , 이승길이승길 (2004), (2004), 참여정부 노사관계법참여정부 노사관계법 , , 제도의 선진화 방안에 대한 제도의 선진화 방안에 대한

모색모색 , , 한국경제연구원 한국경제연구원 대한상공회의소대한상공회의소 (2004), (2004), 노사정위원회 제도의 문제점과 개선과제노사정위원회 제도의 문제점과 개선과제 , ,

대한상공회의소 대한상공회의소 Lim Hyun-Chin, Hwang Suk-Man, Chung Il-Joon(2000), IMF's Restructuring, Lim Hyun-Chin, Hwang Suk-Man, Chung Il-Joon(2000), IMF's Restructuring,

Development Strategy, and Labor Realignment in South Korea, Development Strategy, and Labor Realignment in South Korea, Development and SocietyDevelopment and Society


Internet SitesInternet Sites http://www.lmg.go.krhttp://www.lmg.go.kr http://nodong.orghttp://nodong.org http://www.fktu.or.krhttp://www.fktu.or.kr http://www.kli.re.krhttp://www.kli.re.kr http://www.keri.orghttp://www.keri.org http://www.korcham.nethttp://www.korcham.net http://www.molab.go.krhttp://www.molab.go.kr

Internet SitesInternet Sites http://www.lmg.go.krhttp://www.lmg.go.kr http://nodong.orghttp://nodong.org http://www.fktu.or.krhttp://www.fktu.or.kr http://www.kli.re.krhttp://www.kli.re.kr http://www.keri.orghttp://www.keri.org http://www.korcham.nethttp://www.korcham.net http://www.molab.go.krhttp://www.molab.go.kr

Q&AQ&A

Date post:	31-Dec-2015
Category:	Documents
Upload:	troy-david
View:	36 times
Download:	4 times

KTC

Documents