+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Laborel Group 6

Laborel Group 6

Date post: 06-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: cal-ngo
View: 220 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 25

Transcript
  • 8/3/2019 Laborel Group 6

    1/25

    Consequences of Termination

    Group 6:Camacho, Ferrer, Go, Garcia, Limpo, Ngo, Roque

  • 8/3/2019 Laborel Group 6

    2/25

    Indemnity

    the obligation [or duty] resting on one

    person to make good any loss or damageanother has incurred or may incur byacting at his request for his benefit

    BARRONS LAW DICTIONARY, 264 (6th ed. 2010)

    When applicable:

    When there is valid cause of termination, butinvalid procedure

    When beyond the 30-day preventivesuspension CES AZUCENA, EVERYONE'S LABOR CODE 335 (2010).

  • 8/3/2019 Laborel Group 6

    3/25

    Requisite for Valid Termination

    Just cause

    Due process

    CES AZUCENA, EVERYONE'S LABOR CODE 332 (2010).

  • 8/3/2019 Laborel Group 6

    4/25

    Wenphil Doctrine:

    When the employee is dismissed for avalid reason yet the employer fails tocomply with the proper dismissal

    procedure, the dismissal may still bedeemed valid but the employer stands topay indemnity

    Extent of indemnity: facts of the case andthe gravity of the omission

    CES AZUCENA, EVERYONE'S LABOR CODE 333 (2010).

  • 8/3/2019 Laborel Group 6

    5/25

    Serrano vs. NLRC

    If proper procedure is not observed, theemployee is still dismissed but theemployer shall pay his full backwages

    (from the time of his dismissal to thefinality of the courts decision).

    CES AZUCENA, EVERYONE'S LABOR CODE 334 (2010).

  • 8/3/2019 Laborel Group 6

    6/25

    Agabon vs. NLRC

    Not observing the proper procedure, theemployer shall pay higher indemnity inform of nominal damages (middle ground)

    rather than full backwages.

    The amount is not fixed but depends onthe gravity of the employers disregard for

    the procedural due process

    Includes separation pay if under Articles283 and 284.

    CES AZUCENA, EVERYONE'S LABOR CODE 334 (2010).

  • 8/3/2019 Laborel Group 6

    7/25

    JAKA Food Processing Corp. vs. Pacot, et al.

    If the dismissal is based on just cause, theliability of the employer is more lenientthan in the case where the dismissal is

    based on the authorized causes underArticle 283.

    CES AZUCENA, EVERYONE'S LABOR CODE 335 (2010).

  • 8/3/2019 Laborel Group 6

    8/25

    Valid Cause, Invalid Procedure

    There is still an on going debate on theliability of the employer in failure toobserve procedural due process.

    CES AZUCENA, EVERYONE'S LABOR CODE 335 (2010).

  • 8/3/2019 Laborel Group 6

    9/25

    Preventive Suspension

    Imposed where the employees continued

    employment poses a serious andimminent threat to the life or property of

    the employer or of the co-workers

    If it exceed the maximum period of 30days, the employer will be required to pay

    the employees pay and benefits, and maybe required to pay indemnity

    CES AZUCENA, EVERYONE'S LABOR CODE 335 (2010).

  • 8/3/2019 Laborel Group 6

    10/25

    Reinstatement

    restore to a former state, authority, station from

    which one has been removedBARRONS LAW DICTIONARY, 453 (6th ed. 2010)

    There is no break in the length of service of theemployee

    There is no loss of seniority rights and other

    privileges

    One of the usual consequences in cases ofillegal dismissal

    Reinstatement immediately executoryCES AZUCENA, EVERYONE'S LABOR CODE 344-45 (2010).

  • 8/3/2019 Laborel Group 6

    11/25

    Reinstatement

    Payroll reinstatement

    Instead of actual reinstatement, employermay opt to only include the employee in the

    payment of wages and benefit without havingto actually report for work

    Ted Ferrolino, Payroll Reinstatment, available at http://www.laborlaw.usc-

    law.org/2009/08/03/payroll-reinstatement/ (last accessed December 6, 2011)

  • 8/3/2019 Laborel Group 6

    12/25

    Reinstatement

    Payroll reinstatement

    Allowed in cases of

    preventive suspension and,

    under Article 223 of the Labor Code (LC), wherethe Labor Artbiter ordered reinstatement with theoption of payroll reinstatement

    Not allowed in cases of Labor Dispute (Article263 par. g) --- return to work order

    Ted Ferrolino, Payroll Reinstatment, available at http://www.laborlaw.usc-

    law.org/2009/08/03/payroll-reinstatement/ (last accessed December 6, 2011)

  • 8/3/2019 Laborel Group 6

    13/25

    Reinstatement

    When applicable:

    In cases of dismissal as punishment deemedto be too harsh

    Illegal retrenchment

    Requisites for Valid Retrenchment:

    substantial losses, imminent loss, reasonably necessary,sufficient and convincing evidence

    Instead of reinstatement, separation pay may bepaid (employees decision)

    a months pay for every year of service

    CES AZUCENA, EVERYONE'S LABOR CODE 336, 340 (2010).

  • 8/3/2019 Laborel Group 6

    14/25

    Reinstatement

    When not applicable:

    Strained Relations Principle

    Instead of reinstatement, separation pay, along

    with backwages, would be ordered by the court Applicable in cases where

    the employee holds a position imbued with trust and

    confidence of the employee, and

    the creation of an atmosphere of antipathy andantagonism may be generated that would negatively

    affect the employee (as a result of reinstatement)

    CES AZUCENA, EVERYONE'S LABOR CODE 345 (2010).

  • 8/3/2019 Laborel Group 6

    15/25

    Damages

    monetary compensation which the law

    awards to one who has been injured bythe action of the other; to recompense for

    a legal wrongBARRONS LAW DICTIONARY, 135 (6th ed. 2010)

    When applicable:

    Absence of due process / defective procedure

    CES AZUCENA, EVERYONE'S LABOR CODE 326-50 (2010).

  • 8/3/2019 Laborel Group 6

    16/25

    Damages

    Labor Arbiter and the NLRC can imposedamages as sanction:

    Section 9. Article 217 of the same code, as amended, is hereby further amendedto read as follows:

    "Article 217. Jurisdiction of Labor Arbiters and the Commission. - (a) Except asotherwise provided under this Code, the Labor Arbiters shall have the originaland exclusive jurisdiction to hear and decide... the following cases involving allworkers, whether agricultural or non-agricultural:

    ... (4) Claims for actual, moral, exemplary and other forms ofdamages arising from the employer-employee relations...

    AN ACT TO EXTEND PROTECTION TO LABOR, STRENGTHEN THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF WORKERS TO SELF-ORGANIZATION, COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AND PEACEFUL CONCERTED ACTIVITIES, FOSTER INDUSTRIAL PEACE AND

    HARMONY, PROMOTE THE PREFERENTIAL USE OF VOLUNTARY MODES OF SETTLING LABOR DISPUTES, ANDREORGANIZE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, AMENDING FOR THESE PURPOSES CERTAIN

    PROVISIONS OF PRESIDENTIAL DECREE NO. 442, AS AMENDED, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE LABOR CODE OF THE

    PHILIPPINES, APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFORE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES, art.2 17(1989).

  • 8/3/2019 Laborel Group 6

    17/25

    Damages

    Types of Damages in Dismissal Cases

    Moral damages include physical suffering, mental anguish, fright, serious

    anxiety, besmirched reputation, wounded feelings, moralshock, social humiliation, and similar injury...proximate resultof the defendant's wrongful act for omission. (Article 2217 ofthe Civil Code)

    Recoverable in cases of:

    Bad faith Oppressive acts against labor

    Acts against labor contrary to morals, good customs orpublic policy

    CES AZUCENA, EVERYONE'S LABOR CODE 348 (2010).

    (Reaffirmed in the Eastern

    Shipping Lines, Inc. Vs. FerrerD. Antonio, G.R. No. 171587)

  • 8/3/2019 Laborel Group 6

    18/25

    Damages

    Types of Damages in Dismissal Cases

    Exemplary damages

    imposed, by way of example or correction for the

    public good, in addition to the moral, temperate,liquidated or compensatory damages. (Art. 2229of the Civil Code)

    cannot be recovered as a matter of right; the court

    will decide whether or not they should beadjudicated. (Art.2233 of the Civil Code)

    Recoverable when the dismissal was effected in a

    wanton, oppressive or malevolent mannerCES AZUCENA, EVERYONE'S LABOR CODE 348 (2010).

  • 8/3/2019 Laborel Group 6

    19/25

    Attorneys Fees

    Recoverable in cases of dismissal involving bad

    faith, whimsicality and oppression

    Award of attorney's fees when employee is forced tosue. - It is settled that in actions for recovery of wages orwhere an employee was forced to litigate and has

    incurred expenses to protect his rights and interests,even if not so claimed, an award of attorney's feesequivalent to ten percent (10%) of the total award islegally and morally justifiable.

    Joselito Guianan Chan, Labor Laws of the Philippines, available athttp://www.chanrobles.com/PART3.pdf (last accessed December 6, 2011)

  • 8/3/2019 Laborel Group 6

    20/25

    Financial Assistance

    Sometimes referred to as separation pay

    Different from the separation pay requiredunder Articles 283 and 284 (authorized

    causes).

    Based on compassion and social justice

    CES AZUCENA, EVERYONE'S LABOR CODE 348 (2010).

  • 8/3/2019 Laborel Group 6

    21/25

    Financial Assistance

    May be required in the ff. cases:

    Valid dismissal with causes not relating to theemployees moral character or serious

    misconduct In consideration of the long years of service,

    age, and economic status of the employee

    CES AZUCENA, EVERYONE'S LABOR CODE 348 (2010).

  • 8/3/2019 Laborel Group 6

    22/25

    Financial Assistance

    Not applicable in the cases of termination due tojust causes, involving moral turpitude or aquestion on the moral character of the

    employee, without prejudice to his other rightsand privileges in the CBA

    See Omnibus Rules Implementing the Labor Code,Book VI, Rule I, Section 7

    Reaffirmed in Juliet Apacible vs. Multimed Industries,et al., G.R. No. 178903, May 30, 2011

    CES AZUCENA, EVERYONE'S LABOR CODE 348 (2010).

  • 8/3/2019 Laborel Group 6

    23/25

    Financial Assistance

    Computation:

    Include basic pay, transportation andemergency living allowances (must be

    regular)

    CES AZUCENA, EVERYONE'S LABOR CODE 348 (2010).

  • 8/3/2019 Laborel Group 6

    24/25

    Financial Assistance

    Recent cases that where Financial Assistance wasgranted:

    Eastern Shipping Lines, Inc. vs. Ferrer D. Antonio, G.R. No.171587, Oct. 13, 2009

    Financial Assistance in lieu of retirement benefits (since thepetitioner did not qualify for the retirement benefits)

    Romeo Villaruel vs. Yeo Han Guan, June 1, 2011

    Financial assistance in lieu of separation pay (since the petitionerdid not qualify for separation pay)

    Juliet Apacible vs. Multimed Industries, et al., G.R. No. 178903,May 30, 2011

    Financial assistance not given due to termination with just causes

    ***cases accessed vis www.lawphil.net

  • 8/3/2019 Laborel Group 6

    25/25

    Sources

    PRIMARY AUTHORITIES Codes and Statutes

    An Act To Extend Protection To Labor, Strengthen The Constitutional Rights Of Workers To Self-organization, CollectiveBargaining And Peaceful Concerted Activities, Foster Industrial Peace And Harmony, Promote The Preferential Use Of VoluntaryModes Of Settling Labor Disputes, And Reorganize The National Labor Relations Commission, Amending For These PurposesCertain Provisions Of Presidential Decree No. 442, As Amended, Otherwise Known As The Labor Code Of The Philippines,Appropriating Funds Therefore And For Other Purposes, art.2 17(1989).

    A Decree Instituting A Labor Code Thereby Revising And Consolidating Labor And Social Laws To Afford Protection To Labor,Promote Employment And Human Resources Development And Insure Industrial Peace Based On Social Justice (1974)[hereinafter Labor Code].

    An Act to Ordain And Institute The Civil Code Of The Philippines (1949) [hereinafter Civil Code]. Omnibus Rules Implementing the Labor Code, Book VI, Rule I, Section 7.

    Cases Eastern Shipping Lines, Inc. vs. Ferrer D. Antonio, G.R. No. 171587, in Oct. 13, 2009, available at

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/oct2009/gr_171587_2009.html. Juliet Apacible vs. Multimed Industries, et al., G.R. No. 178903, May 30, 2011, available at

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2011/may2011/gr_178903_2011.html. Romeo Villaruel vs. Yeo Han Guan, June 1, 2011, available at

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2011/jun2011/gr_169191_2011.html.

    SECONDARY AUTHORITIES BOOKS

    BARRONS LAW DICTIONARY, 135 (6th ed. 2010) CES AZUCENA, EVERYONE'S LABOR CODE (2010).

    Internet Sources Joselito Guianan Chan, Labor Laws of the Philippines, available athttp://www.chanrobles.com/PART3.pdf (last

    accessed December 6, 2011) Ted Ferrolino, Payroll Reinstatment, available athttp://www.laborlaw.usc-law.org/2009/08/03/payroll-reinstatement/

    (last accessed December 6, 2011)


Recommended