Aggarwal, J. K. & Nandhakumar, N. (1988, August). On the computation of motionfrom sequences of images – a review. Proceedings of the IEEE, 76 (8), 917–935.doi: 10.1109/5.5965
Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1982). Attachment: Retrospect and prospect. In C. M. Parkes& J. Stevenson-Hinde (Hrsg.), The place of attachment in human behavior (S.3–30). New York: Basic Books.
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Bell, S. M. & Stayton, D. J. (1974). Infant-mother attachmentand social development: ‘Socialisation’ as a product of reciprocal responsivenessto signals. In M. P. M. Richards (Hrsg.), The integration of a child into a socialworld (S. 99–135). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Alisch, L.-M. (1996). Zurück zum Aristotelismus. Systemkonzeptionen und Kon-sequenzen. In L.-M. Alisch (Hrsg.), Pädagogisch-psychologische Handlungs-theorie. Metatheorie – Theorie – Rekonstruktion (S. 335–388). Braunschweig:Braunschweiger Studien zur Erziehungs- und Sozialarbeitswissenschaft.
Alisch, L.-M. (2010a). Distanz zu groß, Komplexität zu hoch: Naturalisierungvertagt. In S. Schlüter & A. Langewand (Hrsg.), Neurobiologie und Erziehungs-wissenschaft. Die neueren Konjunkturen pädagogischer Wissenschaftsforschungaus historischer und systematischer Perspektive (S. 186–208). Bad Heilbrunn:Verlag Julius Klinkhardt.
Alisch, L.-M. (2010b). Multimodale Situationsanalyse (MSA). Entwicklungsstandund Probleme [multimodal situation analysis – state of the art]. Lehrerbildungauf dem Prüfstand. Sonderheft: Lehrerprofessionalität – Was wir wissen und waswir wissen müssen, 3, 71–85.
Alisch, L.-M. (2011a). Konventionen und Signale: Messen zwischen Psychologisie-rung und Naturalisierung. In O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia (Hrsg.), Stationen Em-pirischer Bildungsforschung – Traditionslinien und Perspektiven (S. 234–245).Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978-3-531-94025-0\_17
Alisch, L.-M. (2011b). Lehrprofessionalität: Befunde, Desiderata, Methodenpro-bleme. In J. Doll & E. H. Witte (Hrsg.), Sozialpsychologie, Sozialisation undSchule. Lengerich: Pabst.
Alisch, L.-M. (2011c, Feb.). Nonverbal communication – signals, conventions andincommensurable explanations. Paper presented at the 4th COST 2102 Interna-tional Training School on Cognitive Behavioural Systems, February 21-25, 2011,Dresden, Germany, Berlin. (Paper presented at the 4th COST 2102 Internatio-nal Training School on Cognitive Behavioural Systems, February 21-25, 2011,Dresden, Germany)
Alisch, L.-M. & Gerber, U. (2001). Nichtlineare Zeitreihenanalyse in der Empiri-schen Pädagogik I: Metatheorie und Methodologie. Empirische Pädagogik, 15(1), 7–52.
Alisch, L.-M. &Wagner, J. W. L. (2006). Zur Analyse von Freundschaftsprozessen:Observationale Modellierungen. In L.-M. Alisch & J. W. L. Wagner (Hrsg.),Freundschaften unter Kindern und Jugendlichen. Interdisziplinäre Perspektivenund Befunde (S. 183–265). Weinheim: Juventa.
Altmann, U. (2010a). Beziehungsregulation in Kinderfreundschaften – Eine Pro-zessstudie zu Geschlechterunterschieden. In M. Harring, C. Rohlfs & C. Pa-lentien (Hrsg.), Freundschaften, Cliquen und Jugendkulturen. Peer Groups alsSozialisations- und Bildungsinstanzen (S. 77–95). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für So-zialwissenschaften.
Altmann, U. (2010b). Interrater-Reliabilität = 1 in Videostudien? AutomatisierteErhebung von Nonverbalität in einem Experiment zur Kooperation von Schülern.In B. Schwarz, P. Nenniger & R. S. Jäger (Hrsg.), ErziehungswissenschaftlicheForschung – nachhaltige Bildung. Beiträge zur 5. DGfE-Sektionstagung „Empiri-sche Bildungsforschung“/AEPF-KBBB im Frühjahr 2009 (S. 261–267). Landau:VEP.
Altmann, U. (2011). Investigation of movement synchrony using windowed cross-lagged regression. In A. Esposito, A. Vinciarelli, K. Vicsi, C. Pelachaud & A. Ni-jholt (Hrsg.), Analysis of verbal and nonverbal communication and enactment:The processing issue (S. 344–354). Berlin: Springer.
Altmann, U., Hermkes, R. & Alisch, L.-M. (2007). Analysis of nonverbal in-volvement in dyadic interactions. In A. Esposito, M. Faundez-Zanuy, E. Keller& M. Marinaro (Hrsg.), Verbal and nonverbal communication behaviours. costaction 2102 international workshop, Vierti sul Mare, italy, march 2007, revisedselected and invited papers (S. 37–50). Berlin: Springer.
Altmann, U., Simmich, T. & Alisch, L.-M. (2012). Prozessdynamik stationär be-handelter Patienten mit und ohne Behandlungskrise: Eine zeitreihenanalytischeStudie. Systeme, 2.
Andersen, P. A. & Andersen, J. F. (1993). The exchange of nonverbal intimacy:A critical review of dyadic models. In S. Petronio, J. K. Alberts, M. L. Hecht &J. Buley (Hrsg.), Contemporary perspectives on interpersonal communication (S.433–448). Dubuque, Iowa: Brown & Benchmark Publishers.
Anscombe, F. J. (1948). The transformation of poisson, binominal and negative-binominal data. Biometrika, 35 (3-4), 246–254.
Anscombe, F. J. (1953). Contribution to discussion on paper by H. Hotelling.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 15, 229–230.
Literatur 159
Antoniadis, A. & Oppenheim, G. (1995). Wavelets and statistics. New York, NY:Springer.
Arco, C. M. & McCluskey, K. A. (1981). “A change of pace”: An investigation ofthe salience of maternal temporal style in mother-infant play. Child Development,52, 941–949.
Argyle, M. (2005). Körpersprache und Kommunikation (9. Aufl.). Paderborn:Junfermann.
Argyle, M. & Dean, J. (1965). Eye-contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry, 28(3), 289–304.
Aschoff, J. (1969). Desynchronization and resynchronization of human circadianrhythms. Aerosp. Med., 40 (8), 844–849.
Ashby, W. R. (1961). An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.Ashenfelter, K. T., Boker, S. M., Waddell, J. R. & Vitanov, N. (2009). Spatio-
temporal symmetry and multifractal structure of head movements during dyadicconversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Perfor-mance, 35 (4), 1072–1091.
Ashley, R., Granger, C. W. J. & Schmalensee, R. (1980). Advertising and aggregateconsumption: An analysis of causality. Econometric, 48 (5), 1149–1167. Zugriffauf http://www.jstor.org/stable/1912176
Aulbach, B. (2004). Gewöhnliche Differenzialgleichungen (2. Aufl.). München:Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.
Bachman, G., Narici, L. & Beckenstein, E. (2000). Fourier and wavelet analysis.New York, NY: Springer.
Badalamenti, A. F. & Langs, R. J. (1991). An empirical investigation of humandyadic systems in the time and frequency domains. Behavioral Science, 36 (2),100–114.
Bäni, W. (2002). Wavelets: Eine Einführung für Ingenieure. München: OldenburgVerlag.
Bar-Lev, S. K. & Enis, P. (1992). Variance stabilizing and normalizing transforma-tions for the compound poisson process. Metrika, 39, 165–175.
Bartlett, M. S. (1936). The square root transformation in analysis of variance.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Supplement, 3 (1), 68–78.
Bartlett, M. S. (1947). The use of transformations. Biometrics, 13, 39–52.Bates, J. E. (1975). Effects of a child’s imitation versus nonimitation on adults’
verbal and nonverbal positivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,31 (5), 840–851. doi: 10.1037/h0076677
Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Lemery, C. R., MacInnis, S. & Mullett, J. (1986). Experi-mental methods for studying ’elementary motor mimicry’. Journal of NonverbalBehavior, 10 (2), 102–119.
Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Lemery, C. R. & Mullett, J. (1987). Motor mimicryas primitive empathy. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Hrsg.), Empathy and itsdevelopment (S. 317–338). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Bechinie, M. (1998). BHS – the “broken heart syndrome” – ethological aspects oflovesickness. Unveröffentlichte Dissertation, Universität Wien, Wien.
160 Literatur
Beebe, B., Gerstman, L., Carson, B., Dolins, M., Zigman, A., Rosensweig, H., . . .Korman, M. (1982). Rhythmic communication in the mother-infant dyad. InM. Davis (Hrsg.), Interaction rhythms: Periodicity in communication behavior(S. 13–22). New York, NY: Human Sciences Press.
Belsky, J., Rovine, M. & Taylor, D. G. (1984). The Pennsylvania Infant and FamilyDevelopment Project: III. The origins of individual differences in infant-motherattachment: Maternal and infant contributions. Child Development, 55, 718–728.
Bernieri, F. J. (1988a). Coordinated movement and rapport in teacher-student inter-actions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12 (2), 120–138.
Bernieri, F. J. (1988b). Coordinated movement in human interaction: Synchrony,posture similarity and rapport. Unpublished dissertation, Harvard University,Harvard.
Bernieri, F. J., Davis, J. M., Rosenthal, R. & Knee, C. R. (1994). Interactionalsynchrony and rapport: Measuring synchrony in displays devoid of sound andfacial affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20 (3), 303–311.
Bernieri, F. J. & Gillis, J. S. (1995). The judgment of rapport: A cross-culturalcomparison between Americans and Greeks. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 16(2), 115–130.
Bernieri, F. J., Gillis, J. S., Davis, J. M. & Grahe, J. E. (1996). Dyad rapport andthe accuracy of its judgment across situations: A lens model analysis. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 71 (1), 110–129.
Bernieri, F. J., Reznick, J. S. & Rosenthal, R. (1988). Synchrony, pseudosynchrony,and dissynchrony: Measuring the entrainment process in mother-infant dyads.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (2), 243–253.
Bernieri, F. J. & Rosenthal, R. (1991). Interpersonal coordination: Behavior mat-ching and interactional synchrony. In R. S. Feldman & B. Rimé (Hrsg.), Funda-mentals of nonverbal behavior (S. 401–432). New York, NY: Cambridge Univer-sity Press.
Biemer, S. & Müller, C. (2008). Entwicklung eines Videospiels auf Basis von Open-Source-Bibliotheken für die Anwendung im Rahmen eines Experiments zur Un-tersuchung von dyadischen Interaktionsprozessen. Unveröffentlichte Diplomar-beit, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden. Dresden: Technische UniversitätDresden.
Bobick, A. F. & Davis, J. W. (2001). The recognition of human movement usingtemporal templates. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelli-gence, 23 (3), 257–267. doi: 10.1109/34.910878
Boccaletti, S., Kurths, J., Osipov, G., Valladares, D. L. & Zhou, C. (2002). Thesynchronization of chaotic systems. Physics Reports, 366, 1–101. doi: 10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00137-0
Boker, S. M. (2002). Consequences of continuity: The hunt for intrinsic propertieswithin parameters of dynamics in psychological processes. Multivariate Behavi-oral Research, 37 (3), 405–422.
Boker, S. M. & Cohn, J. F. (2011). Real-time dissociation of facial appearan-ce and dynamics during natural conversation. In C. Curio, H. H. B. lthoff &
Literatur 161
M. A. Giese (Hrsg.), Dynamic faces: Insights from experiments and computation(S. 239–254). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Boker, S. M., Cohn, J. F., Theobald, B. J., Matthews, I., Brick, T. R. & Spies, J. R.(2009). Effects of damping head movement and facial expression in dyadic con-versation using real-time facial expression tracking and synthesized avatars. Phi-losophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 12 (1535),3485–3495.
Boker, S. M., Covey, E. S., Tiberio, S. S. & Deboeck, P. R. (2005). Synchroni-zation in dancing is not winner-takes-all: Ambiguity persists in spatiotemporalsymmetry between dancers. In Proceedings of the north american associati-on for computational, social, and organizational science. Available online atwww.casos.cs.cmu.edu/events/conferences/2005/conference_papers.php.
Boker, S. M. & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2006). Dynamical systems modeling: An appli-cation to the regularization of intimacy and disclosure in marriage. In T. A. Walls& J. L. Schafer (Hrsg.), Models for intensive longitudinal data (S. 195–218). Ox-ford, England: Oxford University Press.
Boker, S. M. & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2007). Coupled dynamics and mutually adaptivecontext. In T. D. Little, J. A. Bovaird & N. A. Card (Hrsg.), Modeling contextualeffects in longitudinal studies (S. 299–324). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates.
Boker, S. M., Leibenluft, E., Deboeck, P. R., Virk, G. & Postolache, T. T. (2008).Mood oscillations and coupling between mood and weather in patients with ra-pid cycling bipolar disorder. International Journal of Child Health and HumanDevelopment, 1 (2), 181–202.
Boker, S. M. & Nesselroade, J. R. (2002). A method for modeling the intrinsicdynamics of intraindividual variability: Recovering the parameters of simulatedoscillators in multi-wave panel data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37 (1),127-160.
Boker, S. M. & Rotondo, J. L. (2002). Symmetry building and symmetry breaking insynchronized movement. In M. I. Stamenov & V. Gallese (Hrsg.), Mirror neuronsand the evolution of brain and language (S. 163–171). Amsterdam, Netherlands:John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Boker, S. M., Xu, M., Rotondo, J. L. & King, K. (2002). Windowed cross-correlation and peak picking for the analysis of variability in the association bet-ween behavioral time series. Psychological Methods, 7 (1), 338–355.
Booth, C. L., Lyons, N. B. & Barnard, K. E. (1984). Synchrony in mother-infantinteraction: A comparison of measurement methods. Child Study Journal, 14,95–114.
Bossel, H. (2004). Systeme, Dynamik, Simulation. Modellbildung, Analyse undSimulation komplexer Systeme. Norderstedt: Books on Demand.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss, vol. 1: Attachment. New York: BasicBooks.
Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss, vol. 2: Separation. New York: BasicBooks.
Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss, vol. 3: Loss. New York: Basic Books.
162 Literatur
Box, G. E. P. & Cox, D. R. (1964). An analysis of transformations (with discussion).Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 26 (2), 211–252.
Box, G. E. P. & Cox, D. R. (1982). An analysis of transformations – revisited.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 177–182.
Brazelton, T. B., Koslowski, B. & Main, M. (1974). The origins of reciprocity: Theearly mother-infant interaction. In M. Lewis & L. A. Rosenblum (Hrsg.), Theeffect of the infant on its caregiver (S. 49–76). New York, NY: Wiley.
Buck, R. (1975). Nonverbal communication of affect in children. Journal of Perso-nality and Social Psychology, 34 (4), 644–653. doi: 10.1037/h0077071
Buder, E. H. (1991). A nonlinear dynamic model of social interaction. Communi-cation Research, 18 (2), 174–198.
Burgoon, J. K., Stern, L. A. &Dillman, L. (1995). Interpersonal adaptation: Dyadicinteraction patterns. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Cappella, J. N. (1976). Modeling interpersonal communication systems as a pairof machines coupled through feedback. In G. R. Miller (Hrsg.), Explorations ininterpersonal communication (S. 59–85). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Cappella, J. N. (1981). Mutual influence in expressive behavior: Adult-adult andinfant-adult interaction. Psychological Bulletin, 89 (1), 101–132.
Cappella, J. N. (1984). The relevance of the microstructure of interaction to rela-tionship change. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1 (2), 239–264.doi: 10.1177/0265407584012006
Cappella, J. N. (1990). On defining conversational coordination and rapport. Psy-chological Inquiry, 1 (4), 303–305.
Cappella, J. N. (1996). Dynamic coordination of vocal and kinesic behavior indyadic interaction: Methods, problems, and interpersonal outcomes. In J. Watt &C. A. van Lear (Hrsg.), Dynamic patterns in communication processes (S. 353–386). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Cappella, J. N. (1997). Behavioral and judged coordination in adult informal so-cial interactions: Vocal and kinesic indicators. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, 72 (1), 119–131.
Cappella, J. N. & Palmer, M. T. (1990). Attitude similarity, relational history, andattraction: The mediating effects of kinesic and vocal behaviors. CommunicationMonographs, 57, 161–183.
Caridakis, G., Tzouveli, P., Malatesta, L., Raouzaiou, A., Karpouzis, K. & Kollias,S. (2010). Affective e-learning system: Analysis of learners state. In A. Tz-anavari & N. Tsapatsoulis (Hrsg.), Affective, interactive and cognitive methodsfor e-learning design: Creating an optimal education experience (S. 275–294).Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Zugriff auf http://www.image.ece.ntua.gr/publications.php doi: 10.4018/978-1-60566-940-3.ch015
Censullo, M., Bowler, R., Lester, B. & Brazelton, T. B. (1987). An instrument forthe measurement of infant-mother synchrony. Nursing Research, 36, 244–248.
Charny, E. J. (1966). Psychosomatic manifestations of rapport in psychotherapy.Psychosomatic Medicine, 28 (4), 305–315.
Literatur 163
Chartrand, T. L. & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholo-gy, 76 (6), 893–910.
Chow, S.-M., Hamaker, E. L., Fujita, F. & Boker, S. M. (2009). Representingtime-varying cyclic dynamics using multiple-subject state-space models. BritishJournal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62 (3), 683–716.
Chow, S.-M., Ram, N., Boker, S. M., Fujita, F. & Clore, G. (2005). Emotion asa thermostat: Representing emotion regulation using a damped oscillator model.Emotion, 5 (2), 208–225.
Chrisholm, K. & Strayer, J. (1995). Verbal and facial measures of children’s emotionand empathy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 59 (2), 299–316. doi:10.1006/jecp.1995.1013
Clarke, T. J., Bradshaw, M. F., Field, D. T., Hampson, S. E. & Rose, D. (2005). Theperception of emotion from body movement in point-light displays of interperso-nal dialogue. Perception, 34 (10), 1171–1180.
Clarke-Stewart, K. A. (1973). Interactions between mothers and their young child-ren: Characteristics and consequences. Monographs of the Society for Researchin Child Development, 38 (6-7), 1-108.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Aufl.).Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cohn, J. F. & Tronick, E. Z. (1988). Mother-infant face-to-face interaction: Influ-ence is bidirectional and unrelated to periodic cycles in either parent’s behavior.Developmental Psychology, 24 (3), 386–392.
Condon, W. S. & Ogston, W. D. (1966). Sound film analysis of normal and pa-thological behaviour patterns. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 143 (4),338–347.
Condon, W. S. & Ogston, W. D. (1967a). A method of studying animal behavior.Journal of Auditory Research, 7, 359–365.
Condon, W. S. & Ogston, W. D. (1967b). A segmentation of behavior. Journal ofPsychiatric Research, 5 (3), 221–235.
Condon, W. S. & Sander, L. W. (1974a). Neonate movement is synchronized withadult speech: Interactional participation and language acquisition. Science, 183(4120), 99–101. doi: 10.1126/science.183.4120.99
Condon, W. S. & Sander, L. W. (1974b). Synchrony demonstrated between move-ments of the neonate and adult speech. Child Development, 45 (2), 456–462.
Cook, J., Tyson, R., White, J., Rushe, R., Gottman, J. & Murray, J. (1995). Mathe-matics of marital conflict: Qualitative dynamic mathematical modeling of maritalinteraction. Journal of Family Psychology, 9 (2), 110–130.
Cook, W. L. (2003). Quantitative methods for deductive (theory-testing) researchon partent-child dynamics. In L. Kuczynski (Hrsg.), Handbook of dynamics inparent-child relations (S. 347–372). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cook, W. L. & Kenny, D. A. (2005). The actor-partner interdependence model: Amodel of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal ofBehavioral Development, 29 (2), 101–109.
164 Literatur
Coulston, R., Oviatt, S. L. & Darves, C. (2002). Amplitude convergence inchildren’s conversational speech with animated personas. In J. Hansen & P. B.(Hrsg.), Proceedings of the international conference on spoken language proces-sing (Bd. 4, S. 2689–2692). Denver, CO: Casual Prod. Ltd.
Crown, C. L. (1991, March). Coordinated interpersonal timing of vision and voiceas a function of interpersonal attraction. Journal of Language and Social Psycho-logy, 10 (1), 29–46.
Cryer, J. D. & Chan, K.-S. (2008). Time series analysis with applications in R (2.Aufl.). New York, NY: Springer.
Dabbs, J. M. (1969). Similarity of gestures and interpersonal influence. In Pro-ceedings of the 77th annual convention of the american psychological associati-on (Bd. 4, S. 337–339). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Proceedings of the 77th Annual Convention of the American Psychological As-sociation.
Damásio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ Irrtum – Fühlen, Denken und das menschlicheGehirn. München: List.
Damásio, A. R. (2000). Ich fühle, also bin ich – Die Entschlüsselung des Bewusst-seins. München: List.
Daubenmire, M. J. & Searles, S. (1982). A dyadic model for the study of conver-gence in nurse-patient interactions. In M. Davis (Hrsg.), Interaction rhythms (S.299–318). New York, NY: Human Sciences Press.
de Boor, C. (1978). A practical guide to splines. Berlin: Springer.Delaherche, E. & Chetouani, M. (2010). Multimodal coordination: Exploring rele-
vant features and measures. In Proceedings of the second international workshopon social signal processing, October 29, 2010, Firenze, Italy (S. 47–52). NewYork, NY: ACM Multimedia.
De Renzi, E., Cavalleri, F. & Facchini, S. (1996). Imitation and utilisation behaviour.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry with Practical Neurology, 61,396–400. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.61.4.396
Dickersin, K. (1990, March). The existence of publication bias and risk factors forits occurrence. Journal of the American Medical Association, 263 (10), 1385–1359. doi: 10.1001/jama.263.10.1385
Dijksterhuis, A. (2002). Automatic social influence. The perception-behavior linkas an explanatory mechanism for behavior matching. In J. P. Forgas & K. D. Wil-liams (Hrsg.), Social influence – direct and indirect processes (S. 95–109). Phlia-delphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Dimberg, U., Thunberg, M. & Elmehed, K. (2000). Unconscious facial reactions toemotional facial expressions. Psychological Science, 11, 86–89.
Dimberg, U., Thunberg, M. & Grunedal, S. (2002). Facial reactions to emotionalstimuli: Automatically controlled emotional responses. Cognition and Emotion,16, 449–472.
Dowd, J. M. & Tronick, E. Z. (1986). Temporal coordination of arm movements inearly infancy: Do infants move in synchrony with adult speech? Child Develop-ment, 57 (3), 762–776.
Literatur 165
Dunham, P. & Dunham, F. (1995). Optimal social structures and adaptive infantdevelopment. In C. Moore & P. Dunham (Hrsg.), Joint attention: Its origins androle in development (S. 159–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Eckerman, C. O., Davis, C. C. & Didow, S. M. (1989). Toddlers’ emerging ways ofachieving social coordinations with a peer. Child Develoment, 60 (2), 440–453.
Efron, B. (1982). Transformation theory: How normal is a family of distributions?Annals of Statistics, 10, 323–339.
Eid, M., Gollwitzer, M. & Schmitt, M. (2011). Statistik und Forschungsmethoden(2nd Aufl.). Weinheim: BELTZ.
Ekman, P. (1999). Basic emotions. In T. Dalgleish & M. Power (Hrsg.), Handbookof cognition and emotion (S. 45–60). Chichester, England: John Wiley & SonsLtd.
Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. (1967). Head and body cues in the judgment of emotion:A reformulation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 24 (3), 711–724.
Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. (1968). Nonverbal behavior in psychotherapy research.In J. Shlien (Hrsg.), Research in psychotherapy (Bd. III, S. 179–216). Washing-ton, D. C.: American Psychological Association.
Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. (1969). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception.Psychiatry, 32 (1), 88–105.
Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. (1974). Detecting deception from the body or face.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29 (3), 288–298.
Elkaim, M., Goldbeter, A. & Goldbeter, E. (1987). Analysis of the dynamics of a fa-mily system in terms of bifurcations. Journal of Social and Biological Structures,10, 21–36.
Engle, R. F. & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error-correction:Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55, 251–276.
Erber, R., Wegner, D. M. & Therriault, N. (1996). On being cool and collected:Mood regulation in anticipation of social interaction. Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 70 (4), 757–766.
Erdfelder, E., Faul, F. & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power ana-lysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 28,1–11. (download: http://www.psycho.uni-duesseldorf.de/aap/projects/gpower/)
Eubank, R. L. (1988). Spline smoothing and nonparametric regression. New York,NY: Marcel Dekker.
Exline, R. V., Thibaut, J., Brannan, C. & Gumpert, P. (1970). Visual interaction inrelation to machiavellianism and an unethical act. In Studies in machiavellianism(S. 53–75). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Fahrmeir, L., Kneib, T. & Lang, S. (2007). Regression. Modelle, Methoden undAnwendungen. Berlin: Springer.
Farran, D. C. & Kasari, C. (1990). A longitudinal analysis of the development ofsynchrony in mutual gaze in mother-child dyads. Journal of Applied Develop-mental Psychology, 11, 419–430.
166 Literatur
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A. & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analy-ses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. BehaviorResearch Methods, 41, 1149–1160.
Feldman, R. (2003). Infant-mother and infant-father synchrony: The coregulationof positive arousal. Infant Mental Health Journal, 24 (1), 1–23.
Feldman, R. (2007a). Mother-infant synchrony and the development of moral orien-tation in childhood and adolescence: Direct and indirect mechanisms of develop-mental continuity. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 77 (4), 582–597. Zu-griff auf http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.77.4.582 doi:10.1037/0002-9432.77.4.582
Feldman, R. (2007b). Parent-infant synchrony and the construction of shared ti-ming; physiological precursors, developmental outcomes, and risk conditions.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48 (3/4), 329–354.
Feldman, R., Greenbaum, C. W. & Yirmiya, N. (1999). Mother-infant affect syn-chrony as an antecedent of the emergence of self-control. Developmental Psy-chology, 35 (1), 223–231.
Feldman, R., Greenbaum, C. W., Yirmiya, N. & Mayes, L. C. (1996). Relationsbetween cyclicity and regulation in mother-infant interaction at 3 and 9 monthsand cognition at 2 years. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 17 (3),347–365.
Feldstein, S. & Field, T. (2002). Vocal behavior in the dyadic interactions of prea-dolescent and early adolescent friends and acquaintances. Adolescence, 37 (147),495–515.
Felmlee, D. H. & Greenberg, D. H. (1999). A dynamic systems model of dyadicinteraction. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 23, 155–180.
Fiege, C., Reuther, F. & Nachtigall, C. (2011). Faire Vergleiche? – Berücksichtigungvon Kontextbedingungen des Lernens beim Vergleich von Testergebnissen ausdeutschen Vergleichsarbeiten. Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung, 1 (2), 133–149.doi: 10.1007/s35834-011-0009-x
Field, T. M. (1995). Psychologically depressed parents. In M. H. Bornstein (Hrsg.),Handbook of parenting, vol. 4: Applied and practical parenting (S. 85–99). Mah-wah: Erlbaum.
Field, T. M., Greenwald, P., Morrow, C., Healy, B., Foster, T., Guthertz, M. & Frost,P. (1992, Mar). Behavior state matching during interactions of preadolescentfriends versus acquaintances. Developmental Psychology, 28 (2), 242–250. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.28.2.242
Field, T. M., Healy, B. T., Goldstein, S. & Guthertz, M. (1990). Behavior-statematching and synchrony in mother-infant interactions of nondepressed versus de-pressed dyads. Developmental Psychology, 26 (1), 7–14.
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B. & Paik, M. C. (2003). Statistical methods for rates andproportions (3. Aufl.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Fogel, A. (1993). Two principles of communication: Co-regulation and framing. InJ. Nadel & L. Camaioni (Hrsg.), New perspective in early communicative deve-lopment (S. 9–22). London: Routledge.
Literatur 167
Fraenkel, D. L. (1983). The relationship of empathy in movement to synchrony,echoing, and empathy in verbal interactions. American Journal of Dance Thera-py, 6 (1), 31–48.
Freeman, M. F. & Tukey, J. W. (1950). Transformations related to the angular andthe square root. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 21 (4), 607–611.
Frey, S., Hirsbrunner, H.-P. & Jorns, U. (1982). Time-series notation: A codingprinciple for the unified assessment of speech and movement in communicationresearch. In E.W. B. Hesslüttich (Hrsg.), Multimedial communication (S. 30–58).Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
Frey, S., Hirsbrunner, H.-P., Pool, J. & Daw, W. (1981). Das Berner System zurUntersuchung nonverbaler Interaktion: I. Die Erhebung des Rohdatenprotokolls.In P. Winkler (Hrsg.), Methoden der Analyse von Face-to-Face Situationen (S.203–236). Stuttgart: Metzler.
Frey, S. & von Cranach, M. (1971). Ein Verfahren zur Messung motorischer Akti-vität. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 18, 392–410.
Frey, S. & von Cranach, M. (1973). A method for the assessment of body move-ment variability. In Social communication and movement (S. 389–418). London,England: Academic Press.
Gardinger, C. W. (1985). Handbook of stochastic methods for physics, chemistryand the natural sciences (2nd Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.
Garvey, C. & BenDebba, M. (1974). Effects of age, sex, and partner on children’sdyadic speech. Child Develoment, 45 (4), 1159–1161.
Gatewood, J. B. & Rosenwein, R. (1981). Interactional synchrony: Genuine orspurious? A critique of recent research. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 6 (1),12–29.
Gianino, A. & Tronick, E. Z. (1986). The mutual regulation model: The infant’sself and interactive regulation and coping and defensive capacities. In T. Field,P. McCabe & N. Schneiderman (Hrsg.), Stress and coping (S. 47–68). Hillsdale,NJ: Erlbaum.
Goldstein, S., Field, T. & Healy, B. (1989, July-September). Concordance of playbehavior and physiology in preschool friends. Journal of Applied DevelopmentalPsychology, 10 (3), 337–351. doi: 10.1016/0193-3973(89)90034-8
Gottman, J. M. (1979). Detecting cyclicity in social interaction. PsychologicalBulletin, 86, 338–348.
Gottman, J. M. (1981). Time-series analysis: A comprehensive introduction forsocial sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gottman, J. M., Guralnick, M. J., Wilson, B., Swanson, C. C. & Murray, J. (1997).What should be the focus of emotion regulation in children? A nonlinear dynamicmathematical model of children’s peer interaction in groups. Development andPsychopathology, 9, 421–452.
Gottman, J. M., Murray, J. D., Swanson, C. C., Tyson, R. & Swanson, K. R. (Hrsg.).(2002). The mathematics of marriage: Dynamic nonlinear models. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.
Gottman, J. M. & Ringland, J. T. (1981). The analysis of dominance and bidirec-tionality in social development. Child Development, 52 (1), 393–412.
168 Literatur
Gottman, J. M., Rose, F. T. & Mettetal, G. (1982). Time series analysis of social-interaction data. In T. Field & A. Fogel (Hrsg.), Emotion and early interaction(S. 267–290). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Grammer, K., Honda, M., Juette, A. & Schmitt, A. (1999). Fuzziness of nonver-bal courtship communication unblurred by motion energy detection. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 77 (3), 487–508.
Grammer, K., Keki, V., Striebel, B., Atzmüller, M. & Fink, B. (2003). Bodies inmotion: A window to the soul. In E. Voland & K. Grammer (Hrsg.), Evolutionaryaesthetics (S. 295–324). Heidelberg: Springer.
Grammer, K., Kruck, K. B. & Magnusson, M. S. (1998). The courtship dance:Patterns of nonverbal synchronization in opposite-sex encounters. Journal ofNonverbal Behavior, 22 (1), 3–29.
Granger, C. W. J. (1986). Developments in the study of cointegrated economicvariables. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 48 (3), 213–228. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.1986.mp48003002.x
Granger, C.W. J. (1988). Causality, cointegration, and control. Journal of EconomicDynamics and Control, 12 (2–3), 551–559. doi: 10.1016/0165-1889(88)90055-3
Granger, C. W. J. (2004). Time series analysis, cointegration, and applications.The American Economic Review, 94 (3), 421–425. Zugriff auf http://www.jstor.org/stable/3592936
Granger, C. W. J. & Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics.Journal of econometrics, 2, 111-120.
Granic, I. & Dishion, T. J. (2003). Talk in adolescent friendships: A step towardmeasuring a pathogenic attractor process. Social Development, 12 (3), 314–334.
Granic, I., O’Hara, A., Pepler, D. & Lewis, M. D. (2007). A dynamic systems ana-lysis of parent-child changes associated with successful real-world-interventionsfor aggressive children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35 (5), 845–857.
Green, N. & Green, K. (2005). Kooperatives Lernen im Klassenraum und im Kol-legium. Velber: Kallmeyer Friedrich Verlag.
Green, P. J. & Silverman, B. W. (1994). Nonparametric regression and generalizedlinear models: A roughness penalty approach. London: Chapman & Hall.
Grümer, K. (1974). Beobachtung. Stuttgart: Teubner.Guéguen, N. (2007a). 100 petites expériences de psychologie de la séduction [100
little experiments in the psychology of seduction]. Paris: Dunod.Guéguen, N. (2007b). Psihologia consumatorului [consumer psychology]. Bu-
carest: Polirom.Guéguen, N., Jacob, C. & Martin, J. (2009). Mimicry in social interaction: Its effect
an human judgment and behavior. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8 (2),253–259.
Haft, W. L. & Slade, A. (1989). Affect attunement and maternal attachment: Apilot study. Special Issue: Internal representations and parent-infant relationships.Infant Mental Health Journal, 10, 157–172.
Hall, E. T. (1963). Proxemics – The study of man’s spatial relationship. In Man’simage in medicine and anthropology (S. 22–31). New York: International Uni-versities Press.
Literatur 169
Hall, E. T. (1976). Die Sprache des Raumes. Düsseldorf: Schwann.Hamilton, M. L. (1973). Imitative behavior and expressive ability in facial expres-
sion of emotion. Development Psychology, 8 (1), 138.Hann, D. M., Osofsky, J. D., Barnard, K. E. & Leonard, G. (1994). Dyadic affect re-
gulation in three caregiving environments. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry,64, 263–269.
Härdle, W. (1990). Applied nonparametric regression. New York, NY: CambrigdeUniversity Press.
Harris, F. J. (1978). On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discretefourier transform. Proceedings of the IEEE, 66 (1), 51–84. doi: 10.1109/PROC.1978.10837
Harrist, A. W., Pettit, G.-S., Dodge, K. A. & Bates, J. E. (1994). Dyadic synchronyin mother-child interaction. Family Relations, 43 (4), 417–424.
Harrist, A. W. &Waugh, R. M. (2002). Dyadic synchrony: Its structure and functionin children’s development. Developmental Review, 22 (4), 555–592.
Hartung, J., Knapp, G. & Sinha, B. K. (2008). Statistical meta-analysis with appli-cation. New Jersey: Wiley.
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T. & Rapson, R. L. (1992). Primitive emotional conta-gion. In S. Clark (Hrsg.), Review of personality and social psychology: Vol. 14Emotions and social behavior (S. 151–177). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T. & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. NewYork, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Hayes, D. P. & Cobb, L. (1982). Cycles of spontaneous conversation under longtermisolation. In M. Davis (Hrsg.), Interaction rhythms: Periodicity in communicativebehavior (S. 319–340). New York, NY: Human Sciences Press.
Hayes, D. P., Meltzer, L. &Wolf, G. (1970). Substantive conclusions are dependentupon techniques of measurement. Behavior Science, 15 (3), 265–268.
Hermkes, R. (2006). Zur Synchronisation in Kinderfreundschaftsbeziehungen. Be-griffsbestimmung, Bedeutung und Untersuchungsperspektiven. In L.-M. Alisch& J. W. L. Wagner (Hrsg.), Freundschaften unter Kindern und Jugendlichen. In-terdisziplinäre Perspektiven und Befunde (S. 107–118). Weinheim: Juventa.
Hermkes, R. & Altmann, U. (2008). Blickverhalten in kooperativen dyadischenInteraktionen von Kindern. Zugriff auf http://141.30.37.165/docs/P72.pdf (Poster presented at 21. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft fürErziehungswissenschaft (DGfE), Dresden, 16.-19.03.2008)
Hess, U. & Blairy, S. (2001). Facial mimicry and emotional contagion to dy-namic emotional facial expressions and their influence on decoding accuracy.International Journal of Psychophysiology, 40 (2), 129–141. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00161-6
Hess, U. & Bourgeois, P. (2010, July). You smile – I smile: Emotion expressionin social interaction. Biological Psychology, 84 (3), 514–520. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.11.001
Hess, U., Philippot, P. & Blairy, S. (1999). Mimicry: Fact and fiction. In P. Philippot& R. S. Feldman (Hrsg.), The social context of nonverbal behavior (S. 213–241).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
170 Literatur
Himberg, T. & Thompson, M. (2009). Group synchronization of coordinated mo-vements in a cross-cultural choir workshop. In J. Louhivuori, T. Eerola, S. Saa-rikallio, T. Himberg & P.-S. Eerola (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 7th triennial con-ference of european society for the cognitive sciences of music (escom 2009) (S.175–180). Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä.
Hinrichsen, D. & Pritchard, A. J. (Hrsg.). (2005). Mathematical systems theory i:Modelling, state space analysis, stability and robustness. Heidelberg: Springer.
Hirsbrunner, H.-P., Frey, S. & Crawford, R. (1987). Movement in human inter-action: Description, parameter formation and analysis. In A. W. Siegman &S. Feldstein (Hrsg.), Nonverbal behavior and communication (2. Aufl., S. 99–140). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hoffmann, R., Alisch, L.-M., Altmann, U., Fehèr, T., Petrick, R., Wittenberg, S. &Hermkes, R. (2008). The acoustic front-end in scenarios of interaction research.In A. Esposito, N. Bourbakis, N. Avouris & I. Hatzilygeroudis (Hrsg.), Verbaland nonverbal features of human-human and human-machine interaction. selec-ted papers from cost action 2102 international workshop, Patras, Greece, 29-31october 2007 (S. 196–209). Berlin: Springer.
Hollenstein, T. & Lewis, M. D. (2006). A state space analysis of emotion andflexibility in parent-child interactions. Emotion, 6 (4), 656–662.
Hove, M. J. & Risen, J. L. (2009). It’s all in the timing: Interpersonal synchronyincreases affiliation. Social Cognition, 27 (6), 949–960.
Hubbard, A. S. E. (2000). Interpersonal coordination in interactions: Evaluationsand social skills. Communication Research Reports, 1746-4099, 17 (1), 95–104.
Isabella, R. A. & Belsky, J. (1991). Interactional synchrony and the origins ofinfant-mother attachment: A replication study. Child Development, 62 (2), 373–384. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01538.x
Isabella, R. A., Belsky, J. & von Eye, A. (1989). The origins of infant-motherattachment: An examination of interactional synchrony during the infant’s firstyear. Developmental Psychology, 25 (1), 12–21. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.25.1.12
Jaffe, J., Beebe, B., Feldstein, S., Crown, C. L. & Jasnow, M. D. (2001). Rhythmsof dialogue in infancy (Bd. 66) (Nr. 2). New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell. (SerialNo. 265)
Jaffe, J. & Feldstein, S. (1970). Rhythms of dialogue. New York: Academic Press.Jenkins, G. M. & Watts, D. G. (1968). Spectral analysis and its applications. SanFrancisco, SF: Holdenday.
Jähne, B. (2002). Digitale bildverarbeitung (5. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its
analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14 (2), 201–211.Johansson, G. (1976). Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual
motion perception. Psychological Research, 38 (4), 379–393.Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R. T., Nelson, D. & Skon, L. (1981). The
effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achie-vement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89 (1), 47–62.
Literatur 171
Joy-Bryant, R. (1991). The effects of stress on reciprocal matching behaviors ofpreterm infants and their caregivers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Uni-versity of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Julien, D. (2005). A procedure to measure interactional synchrony in the contextof satisfied and dissatisfied couples’ communication. In V. Manusov (Hrsg.),The sourcebook of nonverbal measures (S. 199–208). Mahwah, NJ: LawrenceErlbaum Associates Publishers.
Julien, D., Brault, M., Chartrand, E. & Bégin, J. (2000). Immediacy behaviors andsynchrony in satisfied and dissatisfied couples. Canadian Journal of BehavioralSciences, 32 (2), 84–90.
Karger, R. H. (1979). Synchrony in mother-infant interactions. Child Development,50 (3), 882–885.
Kato, T., Takahashi, E., Sawada, K., Kobayashi, N., Watanabe, T. & Ishii, T. (1983).A computer analysis of infant movements synchronized with adult speech. Pe-diatric Research, 17 (8), 625–628.
Katsumata, G., Ogawa, H. & Komori, M. (2009). Evaluation of students’ in-terests using analysis of speech-driven body movement entrainment. Techni-cal Report of The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication En-gineers, 109 (27), 107-112. Zugriff auf http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110007333873/en/
Kawaguchi, H., Murakami, B. & Kawai, M. (2010). Behavioral characteri-stics of children with high functioning pervasive developmental disorders du-ring a game. Journal of Epidemiology, 20, S490–S497. (Supplement II) doi:10.2188/jea.JE20090178
Keller, E. & Tschacher, W. (2007). Prosodic and gestural expression of interactionalagreement. In A. Esposito, M. Faundez-Zanuy, E. Keller & M. Marinaro (Hrsg.),Verbal and nonverbal communication behaviors (S. 85–98). Berlin: Springer.
Kelso, J. A. S., de Guzman, G. C., Reveley, C. & Tognoli, E. (2009, 06). Virtualpartner interaction (VPI): Exploring novel behaviors via coordination dynamics.PLoS ONE, 4 (6), e5749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005749
Kempton, W. (1980). The rythmic basis of interactional micro-synchrony. InJ. A. Fisherman & M. R. Key (Hrsg.), The relationship of verbal and nonver-bal communication (S. 67–75). The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton Publishers.
Kendon, A. (1970). Movement coordination in social interaction: Some examplesdescribed. Acta Psychologica, 32 (2), 101–125.
Kendon, A. (1972). Some relationships between body motion and speech: Ananalysis of an example. In A. W. Siegman & B. Pope (Hrsg.), Studies in dyadiccommunication (S. 177–210). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
Kenny, D. A. (1975). Cross-lagged panel correlation: A test for spuriousness. Psy-chological Bulletin, 82 (6), 887–903.
Kerepesi, A., Kubinyi, E., Jonsson, G. K., Magnusson, M. S. & Miklósi, Á. (2006).Behavioural comparison of human-animal (dog) and human-robot (AIBO) inter-actions. Behavioural Processes, 73, 92–99.
Kimura, M. &Daibo, I. (2006). Interactional synchrony in conversations about emo-tional episodes: A measurement by ‚The between participants pseudosynchrony
172 Literatur
experimental paradigm‘. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30 (3), 115–126. doi:10.1007/s10919-006-0011-5
Kimura, M., Yogo, M. & Daibo, I. (2004). Synchrony tendency in the conversationabout emotional episodes: A measurement by "the between participants pseu-dosynchrony experimental paradigm". Japanese Journal of Interpersonal andSocial Psychology, 4, 92–99.
Knyazevaa, M. G., Jalilic, M., Brioschia, A., Bourquina, I., Fornarib, E., Haslerc,M., . . . Ghika, J. (2010, July). Topography of EEG multivariate phase synchroni-zation in early Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiology of Aging, 31 (7), 1132–1144.
Kobayashi, N., Ishii, T. & Watanabe, T. (1992). Quantitative evaluation of infantbehaviour and mother-infant interaction: An overview of a japanese interdiscipli-nary programme of research. Early Development and Parenting, 1 (1), 23–31.doi: 10.1002/edp.2430010107
Kobayashi, N., Ishii, T., Watanabe, T., Takahashi, E. & Kato, T. (1984). Computeranalysis of entrainment and its clinical and scientific significance. In N. Kobaya-shi & T. B. Brazelton (Hrsg.), The growing child in family and society (S. 3–18).Tokyo, Japan: University of Tokyo Press.
Kobayashi, N., Mizukami, K. & Ishii, T. (1987). Quantitative evaluation of infantbehavior by computer image processing. In S. Okada (Hrsg.), Neonatal brain andbehavior (S. 115–130). Nagoya, Japan: University of Nagoya Press.
Kohlberg, L. (1996). Die Psychologie der Moralentwicklung. Frankfurt a. M.:Suhrkamp. (Aus dem Amerikanischen von Wolfgang Althof)
Kokkinaki, T. (2003, July). A longitudinal, naturalistic and cross-cultural study onemotions in early infant-parent imitative interactions. British Journal of Develop-mental Psychology, 21 (2), 243–258. doi: 10.1348/026151003765264066
Komori, M., Maeda, K. & Nagaoka, C. (2007). A video-based quantification me-thod of body movement synchrony: An application for dialogue in counselling.Japanese Journal of Interpersonal and Social Psychology, 7, 41–48.
Konvalinka, I., Vuust, P., Roepstorff, A. & Frith, C. D. (2009). A coupled oscil-lator model of interactive tapping. In J. Louhivouri, T. Eerola, S. Saarikallio,T. Himberg & P.-S. Eerola (Hrsg.), Proccedings of the 7th triennial conferenceof european society for the cognitive sciences of music (escom 2009), jyväskylä,finland (S. 242–245). Jyväskylä, Finland. Zugriff auf http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-2009411268
Kopp, S. (2010, June). Social resonance and embodied coordination in face-to-face conversation with artificial interlocutors. Speech Communication, 52 (6),587–597. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2010.02.007
Koss, T. & Rosenthal, R. (1997). Interactional synchrony, positivity and patient-satisfaction in the physician-patient relationship. Medical Care, 35 (11), 1158–1163.
Krasner, L. (1958). Studies of the conditioning of verbal behavior. PsychologicalBulletin, 55 (3), 148–170.
Kröhne, U. (2010). Estimation of average total effects in quasi-experimental desi-gns: Nonlinear contraints in structural equation models. Unveröffentlichte Dis-sertation, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena.
Literatur 173
Kugiumutzakis, G. (1999). Genesis and development of early infant mimesis to fa-cial and vocal models. In J. Nadel & G. Butterworth (Hrsg.), Imitation in infancy(S. 36–59). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kupferberg, A., Glasauer, S., Huber, M., Rickert, M., Knoll, A. & Brandt, T. (2011).Biological movement increases acceptance of humanoid robots as human partnersin motor interaction. AI & Society, Online First, 26 (4), 339–345. doi: 10.1007/s00146-010-0314-2
Kupper, Z., Ramseyer, F., Hoffmann, H., Kalbermatten, S. & Tschacher, W. (2010).Video-based quantification of body movement during social interaction indicatesthe severity of negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. SchizophreniaResearch, 121, 90–100.
La France, M. (1979). Nonverbal synchrony and rapport: Analysis by the cross-lagpanel technique. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42 (1), 66–70.
La France, M. (1982). Posture mirroring and rapport. In M. Davis (Hrsg.), Inter-action rhythms: Periodicity in communicative behavior (S. 279–298). New York,NY: Human Sciences Press.
La France, M. (1985). Postural mirroring and intergroup orientation. Personalityand Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 207–218.
La France, M. & Broadbent, M. (1976). Group rapport: Posture sharing as a non-verbal indicator. Group & Organization Management, 1 (3), 328–333.
La France, M. & Ickes, W. (1981). Posture mirroring and interactional involvement:Sex and sex typing effects. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 5 (3), 139–154.
Lakens, D. (2010). Movement synchrony and perceived entitativity. Journal ofExperimental Social Psychology, 46, 701–708. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.015
Lakens, D. & Stel, M. (2011). If they move in sync, they must feel in sync: Move-ment synchrony leads to attributions of rapport and entitativity. Social Cognition,29 (1), 1–14.
Lakin, J. L. (2003). Exclusion and nonconscious behavioral mimicry: Mimickingthe behaviors of others to regulate identity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Lakin, J. L. & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry tocreate affiliation and rapport. Psychological Science, 14 (4), 334–339.
Lakin, J. L., Jefferis, V. E., Cheng, C. M. & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). The chameleoneffect as social glue: Evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconsciousmimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27 (3), 145–162.
Lanzetta, J. T. & Englis, B. G. (1989). Expectations of cooperation and compe-tition and their effects on observers’ vicarious emotional responses. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 56 (4), 543–554.
Leonhart, R. (2004). Lehrbuch Statistik. Einstieg und Vertiefung. Bern: Hans Hu-ber.
Lester, B. M., Hoffman, J. & Brazelton, T. B. (1985). The rhythmic structure ofmother-infant interaction in term and preterm infants. Child Development, 56 (1),15–27.
174 Literatur
Locascio, J. L. (1982). The cross-lagged correlation technique: Reconsideration interms of exploratory utility, assumption specification and robustness. Educationaland Psychological Measurement, 42 (4), 1023–1036.
Luce, G. (1970). Biological rhythms in human and animal physiology. New York,NY: Dover.
Lundy, B., Field, T., Mcbride, C., Field, T. & Largie, S. (1998). Same-sex andopposite-sex best friend interactions among high school juniors and seniors. Ado-lescence, 33 (130), 279–89.
Maas, H.-G., Dietrich, D., Schwalbe, E., Bäßler, M. &Westfeld, P. (2006). Analysisof the motion behaviour of Jakobshavn Isbræ Glacier in Greenland by monocu-lar image sequence analysis. International Archives of Photogrammetry, RemoteSensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 36 (5), 179–183.
Maccoby, E. & Martin, J. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In P. H. Mussen (Hrsg.), Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 4.Socialization, Personality, and Social Development (S. 1–101). New York, NY:Wiley.
Maddux, W. W., Mullen, E. & Gelinsky, A. D. (2008). Chameleons bake biggerpies and take bigger pieces: Strategic behavioral mimicry facilitates negotiationoutcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 461–468.
Marchal, J. H. (1975). On the concept of a system. Philosophy of Science, 42,448–468.
Marin, L., Issartel, J. & Chaminade, T. (2009). Interpersonal motor coordination.From human-human to human-robot interactions. Interaction Studies, 10 (3),479–504. doi: 10.1075/is.10.3.09mar
Martino, G. & Marks, L. E. (2000). Cross-modal interaction between vision andtouch: the role of synesthetic correspondence. Perception, 29 (6), 745–754. doi:10.1068/p2984
Matarazzo, J. D., Saslow, G. W., Wiens, A. N., Weitman, M. & Allen, B. V. (1964).Interviewer head nodding and interviewee speech durations. Psychology: Theory,Research, and Practice, 1 (2), 54–63.
Maurer, R. E. & Tindall, J. H. (1983). Effect of postural congruence on client’sperception of counselor empathy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30 (2), 158–163.
Maxwell, G. M. & Cook, M. W. (1985). Postural congruence and judgments ofliking and perceived similarity. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 14, 20–26.
Mayer, A., Thoemmes, F., Rose, N. & West, S. G. (2012). Theory and analysis oftotal, direct and indirect causal effects.(IN PREPARATION)
McDowall, J. J. (1978a). Interactional synchrony: A reappraisal. Journal of Perso-nality and Social Psychology, 36 (9), 963–975.
McDowall, J. J. (1978b). Microanalysis of filmed movement: The reliability ofboundary detection by observers. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 3 (2), 77–88.
Mehrabian, A. (1969). Significance of posture and position in the communicationof attitude and status relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 71 (5), 359–372.
Literatur 175
Mehrabian, A. (1972). Nonverbal communication. New York, NY: Aldine Ather-ton.
Meltzoff, A. & Gopnik, A. (1993). The role of imitation in understanding per-sons and developing a theory of mind. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg &D. J. Cohen (Hrsg.), Understanding other minds (S. 335–366). Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.
Messinger, D. S., Mahoor, M. H., Chow, S.-M. & Cohn, J. F. (2009). Automa-ted measurement of facial expression in infant-mother interaction: A pilot study.Infancy, 14 (3), 285–305. doi: 10.1080/15250000902839963
Müller, H.-G. (1980). Nonparametric regression analysis of longitudinal data.Berlin: Springer.
Nachtigall, C. &Wirtz, M. (2009). Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung und Inferenzstatis-tik. Statistische Methoden für Psychologen. Teil 2 (9. Aufl.). Weinheim: Juventa.
Nadel, J., Guerini, C., Peze, A. & Rivet, C. (1999). The evolving nature of imitationas a format for communication. In J. Nadel & G. Butterworth (Hrsg.), Imitationin infancy (S. 209–234). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nagaoka, C. & Komori, M. (2007). Embodied synchrony in conversation. In T. Nis-hida (Hrsg.), Conversational informatics: An engineering approach (S. 331–351).Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.
Nagaoka, C. & Komori, M. (2008). Body movement synchrony in psychothera-peutic counseling: A study using the video-based quantification method. IEICE– TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, E91-D (6), 1634–1640. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ietisy/e91-d.6.1634
Nagaoka, C., Komori, M., Nakamura, T. & Draguna, M. R. (2005, August). Ef-fects of receptive listening on the congruence of speakers’ response latencies indialogues. Psychological Reports, 97 (1), 265–274.
Nagaoka, C., Komori, M. & Yoshikawa, S. (2005). Synchrony tendency: Interac-tional synchrony and congruence of nonverbal behavior in social interaction. InH. Tarumi, Y. Li & T. Yoshida (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 2005 international con-ference on active media technology, 19–21 may 2005, takamatsu, kagawa, japan(S. 529–534). doi: 10.1109/AMT.2005.1505415
Nagaoka, C., Yoshikawa, S. & Komori, M. (2006, July). Embodied synchrony ofnonverbal behaviour in counselling: A case study of role playing school coun-selling. In Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the cognitive sciencesociety (S. 1862–1867). Vancouver, Canada.
Nagengast, B. (2009). Causal inference in multilevel designs. UnveröffentlichteDissertation, Frierich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena.
Namy, L. L., Nygaard, L. C. & Sauerteig, D. (2002). Gender differences in vocalaccommodation: The role of perception. Journal of Language and Social Psy-chology, 21, 422–432.
Neumann, R. & Strack, F. (2000). “Mood contagion”: The automatic transfer ofmood between persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (2),211–223.
176 Literatur
Newtson, D., Hairfield, J., Bloomingdale, J. & Cutino, S. (1987). The structure ofaction and interaction. Social Cognition, 3 (3), 191–237. (Special Issue: Cogni-tion and Action) doi: 10.1521/soco.1987.5.3.191
Nichols, K., Gergely, G. & Fonagy, P. (2001). Experimental protocols for investiga-ting relationships among mother-infant interaction, affect regulation, physiologi-cal markers of stress responsiveness, and attachment. Bulletin of the MenningerClinic, 65, 371–379.
Nowak, A., Vallacher, R. R. & Zochowski, M. (2005). The emergence of perso-nality: dynamic foundations of individual variation. Developmental Review, 25,351–385. doi: doi:10.1016/j.dr.2005.10.004
Obermeier, C., Holle, H. & Gunter, T. C. (2010). What iconic gesturefragments reveal about gesture-speech integration: When synchrony is lost,memory can help. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. (Retrieved fromhttp://www.mitpressjournals.org/toc/jocn/22/10) doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21498
Ostrov, K. A. (1981). A movement approach to the study of infant/caregiver com-munication during infant psychotherapy. American Journal of Dance Therapy, 4(1), 25–41.
O’Toole, R. & Dubin, R. (1968). Baby feeding and body sway: An experiment inGeorge Herberts Mead’s “Taking the role of the other”. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology, 10 (1), 59–65. doi: 10.1037/h0026387
Oullier, O., De Guzman, G. C., Jantzen, K. J., Lagarde, J. & Kelso, J. A. S. (2008).Social coordination dynamics: Measuring human bonding. Social Neuroscience,3 (2), 178–192. doi: 10.1080/17470910701563392
Pardo, J. S. (2006). On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction.Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 119 (4), 2382–2393. doi: 10.1121/1.2178720
Pelech,W. (2002). Charting the interpersonal underworld: The application of clusteranalysis to the study of interpersonal coordination in small groups. Currents: NewScholarship in the Human Services, 1 (1), online.
Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child. New York, NY: Free Press.Pikovsky, A., Rosenblum, M. & Kurths, J. (2001). Synchronization. A universal
concept in nonlinear sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Pisarchik, A. N., Jaimes-Reátegui, R. & García-López, J. H. (2008, Feb). Syn-
chronization of coupled bistable chaotic systems: experimental study. Philoso-phical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 366 (1864), 459-473. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2007.2103
Pratt, W. K. (1991). Digital image processing. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Ramseyer, F. (2008). Synchronisation nonverbaler Interaktion in der Psychothera-
pie. Unveröffentlichte Dissertation, Universität Bern, Bern.Ramseyer, F. (2010a). Nonverbale Synchronisation in der Psychotherapie. Systeme,
24 (1), 5–30.Ramseyer, F. (2010b). Nonverbale Synchronisation in therapeutischer Interaktion.
In S. Bender (Hrsg.), Bewegungsanalyse von Interaktionen (S. 11–32). Berlin:Logos.
Literatur 177
Ramseyer, F. & Tschacher, W. (2006). Synchrony: A core concept for a constructi-vist approach to psychotherapy. Constructivism in the Human Sciences, 11 (1-2),150–171.
Ramseyer, F. & Tschacher, W. (2008). Synchrony in dyadic psychotherapy sessions.In S. Vrobel, O. E. Rössler & T. Marks-Tarlow (Hrsg.), Simultaneity: Temporalstructures and observer perspectives (S. 329–347). Singapore: World Scientific.
Ramseyer, F. & Tschacher, W. (2010). Nonverbal synchrony or random coinci-dence? How to tell the difference. In A. Esposito, N. Campbell, C. Vogel, A. Hus-sain & A. Nijholt (Hrsg.), Development of multimodal interfaces: Active listeningand synchrony (S. 182–196). Berlin: Springer.
Ramseyer, F. & Tschacher, W. (2011). Nonverbal synchrony in psychotherapy:Coordinated body-movement reflects relationship quality and outcome. Journalof Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79 (3), 284–295. doi: 10.1037/a0023419
Rasting, M. & Beutel, M. E. (2005, Jul). Dyadic affective interactive patterns inthe intake interview as a predictor of outcome. Psychotherapy Research, 15 (3),188–198. doi: 10.1080/10503300512331335039
Reidsma, D., Nijholt, A., Tschacher, W. & Ramseyer, F. (2010). Measuring multi-modal synchrony for human-computer interaction. In A. Sourin (Hrsg.), Procee-dings of CYBERWORLDS 2010 (S. 67–71). Singapore: IEEE Computer SocietyPress. doi: 10.1109/CW.2010.9
Rizzolatti, G. & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Reviewsof Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.
Rocissano, L., Slade, A. & Lynch, V. (1987). Dyadic synchrony and toddler com-pliance. Developmental Psychology, 23 (5), 698–704.
Rogers, S. J., Hepburn, S. L., Stackhouse, T. & Wehner, E. (2003). Imitationperformance in toddlers with autism and those with other developmental dis-orders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44 (5), 763–781. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00162
Rogosa, D. (1980). A critique of cross-lagged correlation. Psychological Bulletin,88 (2), 245–258.
Rosenblum, M. G., Cimponeriu, L., Bezerianos, A., Patzak, A. & Mrowka, R.(2002). Identification of coupling direction: Application to cardiorespiratory in-teraction. Physical Review E, 65 (041909), 1–11.
Rosenblum, M. G., Cimponeriu, L. & Pikovsky, A. S. (2006). Coupled oscilla-tors approach in analysis of bivariate data. In B. Schelter, M. Winterhalder &J. Timmer (Hrsg.), Handbook of time series analysis (S. 159–180). Weinheim:Wiley.
Rosenblum, M. G., Pikovsky, A. S. & Kurths, J. (1996). Phase synchronization ofchaotic oscillators. Physical Review Letter, 76 (11), 1804–1807.
Rosenblum, M. G., Pikovsky, A. S. & Kurths, J. (1997). From phase to lag syn-chronization in coupled chaotic oscillators. Physical Review Letters, 78 (22),4193–4196. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.4193
Rosenfeld, H. M. (1981). Whither interactional synchrony? In K. Bloom (Hrsg.),Prospective issues in infancy research (S. 71–97). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erl-baum Associates.
178 Literatur
Rotondo, J. L. & Boker, S. M. (2002). Behavioral synchronization in human conver-sational interaction. In M. I. Stamenov & V. Gallese (Hrsg.), Mirror neurons andthe evolution of brain and language (S. 151–162). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsPublishing Company.
Sackett, G. P. (1980). Lag sequential analysis as a data reduction technique in socialinteraction research. In D. B. Sawin, R. C. Hawkins, L. O. Walker & J. H. Pen-ticuff (Hrsg.), Exceptional infant: Psychosocial risks in infant-environment tran-sactions (Bd. 4, S. 300–340). New York, NY: Brunner Mazel.
Sadler, P., Ethier, N., Gunn, G. R., Duong, D. & Woody, E. (2009). Are we onthe same wavelength? Interpersonal complementarity as shared cyclical patternsduring interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97 (6), 1005–1020. doi: 10.1037/a0016232
Salvin, R. (1994). Using student team learning (4. Aufl.). Baltimore, MD: JohnHopkins University.
Sato, W. & Yoshikawa, S. (2007). Spontaneous facial mimicry inresponse to dynamic facial expressions. Cognition, 104 (1), 1–18.Zugriff auf http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001002770600120X doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.001
Scheflen, A. E. (1964). The significance of posture in communication systems.Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 27 (4), 316–331.
Scheflen, A. E. (1973). Communicational structure of a psychotherapy transaction.Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Scheflen, A. E. (1979). Die Bedeutung der Körperhaltung in Kommunikationssys-temen. In K. R. Scherer & H. G. Wallbott (Hrsg.), Nonverbale Kommunikation:Forschungsberichte zum Interaktionsverhalten (S. 151–185). Weinheim: BeltzVerlag.
Scherer, K. R. (1975). Ein Modell zur Erforschung von Kommunikations- undInferenzprozessen in der sozialen Interaktion. In W. H. Tack (Hrsg.), Berichtüber den 29. Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (S. 282–285).Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Schmidt, R. C. & O’Brien, B. (1997). Evaluating the dynamics of unintendedinterpersonal coordination. Ecological Psychology, 9 (3), 189–206.
Schmitz, B. (1987). Zeitreihenanalyse in der Psychologie. Weinheim: BELTZ.Schoenberg, I. J. (1993). Cardinal spline interpolation (2nd Aufl.). Montpelier,
Vermont: Capital City Press.Schölmerich, A., Fracasso, M. P., Lamb, M. E. & Broberg, A. G. (1995). Interactio-
nal harmony attachment 7 and 10 months of age predicts security of attachmentas measured by Q-sort ratings. Social Development, 4, 6274.
Shumway, R. H. & Stoffer, D. S. (2006). Time series analysis and its applications:With R examples (2nd Aufl.). New York, NY: Springer.
Siffre, M. (1964). Beyond time. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Snijders, T. & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis – an introduction to basic and
advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.Solley, R. F. (1988, November). Posture mirroring and therapeutic alliance. Disser-
tation Abstracts International, 49 (5), 1957-B.
Literatur 179
Sonka, M., Hlavac, V. & Boyle, R. (1993). Image processing, analysis, and machinevision. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall Computing.
Steenbeek, H. W. & van Geert, P. L. C. (2005). A dynamic systems model of dyadicinteraction during play of two children. European Journal of DevelopmentalPsychology, 2 (2), 105–145.
Steenbeek, H. W. & van Geert, P. L. C. (2007). A theory and dynamic model ofdyadic interaction: Concerns, appraisals, and contagiousness in a developmentalcontext. Developmental Review, 27 (1), 1–40.
Steenbeek, H.W. & van Geert, P. L. C. (2008). An empirical validation of a dynamicsystems model of interaction: Do children of different sociometric statuses differin their dyadic play? Developmental Science, 11 (2), 253–281.
Stel, M. & Vonk, R. (2010). Mimicry in social interaction: Benefits for mimickers,mimickees, and their interaction. British Journal of Psychology, 101 (2), 311–323. doi: 10.1348/000712609X465424
Stern, D. N. (1971). A mirco-analysis of mother-infant interaction. Journal of theAcademy of child Psychiatry, 10, 501–517.
Stern, D. N. (1974). Mother and infant at play. In M. Lewis & L. A. Rosenblum(Hrsg.), Origins of behavior, Vol. 1: The effect of the infant on its caregiver (S.187–213). New York, NY: Wiley.
Stern, D. N. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psycho-analysis and developmental psychology. New York: Basic Books.
Stern, D. N., Hofer, L., Haft, W. & Dore, J. (1985). Affect attunement: The sharingof feeling states between mother and infant by means of intermodal fluency. InT. M. Field & N. A. Fox (Hrsg.), Social perception in early infancy (S. 249–268).Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Steyer, R. (1992). Theorie kausaler Regressionsmodelle. Stuttgart: Gustav FischerVerlag.
Steyer, R. (2003). Wahrscheinlichkeit und Regression. Berlin: Springer.Steyer, R. (2005). Analyzing individual and average causal effects via structural
equation models. Methodology European Journal of Research Methods for theBehavioral and Social Sciences, 1, 39–54.
Steyer, R. & Eid, M. (2001). Messen und testen (2. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.Steyer, R., Fiege, C. & Rose, N. (2010). Analyzing total, direct and indirect causal
effects in intervention studies. ISSBD Bulletin, 57, 10–13.Steyer, R., Gabler, S., von Davier, A. & Nachtigall, C. (2000). Causal regression
models II: Unconfoundedness and causal unbiasedness. Methods of Psychologi-cal Research Online, 5 (3), 55–86. Zugriff auf www.mpr-online.de
Steyer, R., Gabler, S., von Davier, A., Nachtigall, C. & Buhl, T. (2000). Causalregression models I: Individual and average causal effects. Methods of Psycholo-gical Research Online, 5 (2), 39–71. Zugriff auf www.mpr-online.de
Steyer, R., Nachtigall, C., Wüthrich-Martone, O. & Kraus, K. (2002). Causal re-gression models III: Covariates, conditional, and unconditional average causaleffects. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 7 (1), 41–68. Zugriff aufwww.mpr-online.de
180 Literatur
Steyer, R. & Partchev, I. (2008, March). Effectlite: User’s manual. A program forthe uni- and multivariate analysis of unconditional, conditional and average meandifferences between groups (Version 3 for Mplus Aufl.) [Software-Handbuch].Jean, Germany.
Steyer, R., Partchev, I., Kröhne, U., Nagengast, B. & Fiege, C. (2012). Probabilityand causality I. New York: Springer. (IN PREPARATION)
Strayer, J. & Roberts, W. (1997, May). Facial and verbal measures of children’semotions and empathy. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20(4), 627–649. doi: 10.1080/016502597385090
Street, R. L. & Cappella, J. N. (1989). Social and linguistic factors influencingadaptation in children’s speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18 (5),497–519. doi: 10.1007/BF01067313
Strogatz, S. H. (1994). Nonlinear dynamics and chaos: With applications in physics,biology, chemistry, and engineering. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Suhl, U. (1999). Die Dynamik der Dyade: Eine Untersuchung zur Entstehung ko-operativen und kompetitiven Verhaltens in Konfliktsituationen. UnveröffentlichteDissertation, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena.
Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York, NY:Norton.
Thomas, E. A. C. (1979). An approach to characterizing parent-infant interactions.In A. W. Boykin, A. J. Franklin & J. F. Yates (Hrsg.), Research directions of blackpsychologists (S. 23–32). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Thomas, E. A. C. & Malone, T. W. (1979). On the dynamic of two-person interac-tions. Psychological Review, 86 (4), 331–360.
Thomas, E. A. C. & Martin, J. A. (1976). Analyses of parent-infant interaction.Psychological Review, 83 (2), 141–156.
Tickle-Degnen, L. & Rosenthal, R. (1990). The nature of rapport and its nonverbalcorrelates. Psychological Inquiry, 1 (4), 285–293.
Trevarthen, C., Kokkinaki, T. & Fiamenghi, G. O. (1999). What infants’ imita-tions communicate: With mothers, with fathers and with peers. In J. Nadel &G. Butterworth (Hrsg.), Imitation in infancy (S. 127–185). Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.
Tronick, E. D., Als, H. & Brazelton, T. B. (1977). Mutuality in mother-infantinteraction. Journal of Communication, 27 (2), 74–79.
Trout, D. L. & Rosenfeld, H. M. (1980). The effect of postual lean and bodycongruence on the judgement of psychotherapeutic rapport. Journal of NonverbalCommunication, 4 (3), 176–190.
Tschacher, W., Baur, N. & Grawe, K. (2000). Temporal interaction of processvariables in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 10 (3), 296–308.
Tschacher, W. & Scheier, C. (1995). Analyse komplexer psychologischer Systeme.II: Verlaufsmodelle und Komplexität einer Paartherapie. System Familie, 8 (3),160–171.
Uzgiris, I. C. (1981). Two functions of imitation during infancy. InternationalJournal of Behavioral Development, 4, 1–12.
Literatur 181
Uzgiris, I. C. (1999). Imitation as activity: Its developmental aspects. In J. Na-del & G. Butterworth (Hrsg.), Imitation in infancy (S. 186–206). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Vallacher, R. R. & Nowak, A. (2009). The dynamics of human experience: Fun-damentals of dynamical social psychology. In S. J. Guastello, M. Koopmans &D. Pincus (Hrsg.), Chaos and complexity in psychology: The theory of nonlineardynamical systems (S. 370–401). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
van Baaren, R. B., Holland, R. W., Kawakami, K. & van Knippenberg, A. (2004).Mimicry and prosocial behavior. Psychological Science, 15 (1), 71–74.
van Baaren, R. B., Holland, R. W., Steenaert, B. & van Knippenberg, A. (2003). Mi-micry for money: Behavioral consequences of imitation. Journal of ExperimentalSocial Psychology, 39 (4), 393–398.
van Baaren, R. B., Horgan, T. G., Chartrand, T. L. &Dijkmans, M. (2004, Mar). Theforest, the trees, and the chameleon: Context dependence and mimicry. Journalof Personality and Social Psychology, 86 (3), 453–459. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.453
van Baaren, R. B., Maddux, W. W., Chartrand, T. L., de Bouter, C. & van Knip-penberg, A. (2003). It takes two to mimic: Behavioral consequences of self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84 (5), 1093–1102.doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1093
Varni, G., Volpe, G. & Camurri, A. (2010). A system for real-time multimodal ana-lysis of nonverbal affective social interaction in user-centric media. IEEE Tran-sactions on Multimedia, 12 (6), 576–590. doi: 10.1109/TMM.2010.2052592
Vernikos-Danellis, J. & Winget, C. M. (1979). The importance of light, posturaland social cues in the regulation of plasma cortisol rhythms in man. In A. Rein-berg & F. Halbert (Hrsg.), Chronopharmacology (S. 101–106). Elmsford, NY:Pergamon.
von Salisch, M. (1991). Kinderfreundschaften. Emotionale Kommunikation im Kon-flikt. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Wagner, J. W. L. & Alisch, L.-M. (2006). Zum Stand der psychologischen und päd-agogischen Freundschaftsforschung. In L.-M. Alisch & J. W. L. Wagner (Hrsg.),Freundschaften unter Kindern und Jugendlichen. Interdisziplinäre Perspektivenund Befunde (S. 11–91). Weinheim: Juventa.
Wallbott, H. G. (1979). Körperhaltung, Körperorientierung und Körperbewegung– Einführung. In K. R. Scherer & H. G. Wallbott (Hrsg.), Nonverbale Kommuni-kation: Forschungsberichte zum Interaktionsverhalten (S. 146–151). Weinheim:BELTZ.
Warner, R. M. (1992). Cyclicity of vocal activity increases during conversation:Support for a nonlinear systems model of dyadic social interaction. BehavioralScience, 37 (2), 128–138. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830370204
Warner, R. M. (1996). Coordinated cycles in behavior and physiology during face-to-face social interactions. In J. H. Watt & C. A. VanLear (Hrsg.), Dynamicpatterns in communication processes. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
182 Literatur
Warner, R. M., Malloy, D., Schneider, K., Knoth, R. &Wilder, B. (1987). Rhythmicorganization of social interaction and observer ratings of affect and involvement.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 11, 57–74.
Warner, R. M., Waggener, T. B. & Kronauer, R. E. (1983). Synchronized cycles inventilation and vocal activity during spontaneous conversational speech. Journalof Applied Physiology: Respiration, Environmental and Exercise Physiology, 54,1324–1334.
Watanabe, T. (1982). A study on synchronization of body movement and voice inman-machine interface. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Tokyo, Tokyo.
Watanabe, T. (1983). A study of motion-voice synchronization. Bulletin of theJapanese Society of Mechanical Engineers, 26 (222), 2244–2250.
Watanabe, T. (1985). A study of rhythm-motion synchronization. Bulletin of theJapanese Society of Mechanical Engineers, 28 (242), 1789–1795.
Weaver, J. H. (1989). Theory of discrete and continuous Fourier analysis. NewYork, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Webb, E. J., Capbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D. & Sechrest, L. (1975). NichtreaktiveMeßverfahren. Weinheim: BELTZ.
Welkowitz, J., Cariffe, G. & Feldstein, S. (1976). Conversational congruence as acriterion of socialization in children. Child Development, 47 (1), 269–272.
Westfeld, P. (2012). Geometrische und stochastische Modelle zur Verarbeitung von3D-Kameradaten am Beispiel menschlicher Bewegungsanalysen. Unveröffent-lichte Dissertation, Technische Universität Dresden, Fakultät Forst-, Geo- undHydrowissenschaften, Professur für Photogrammetrie, Dresden, Germany.
Westfeld, P. & Hempel, R. (2008). Range image sequence analysis by 2.5-D leastsquares tracking with variance component estimation and robust variance cova-riance matrix estimation. In The International Archives of the Photogrammetry,Remote, Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 3. - 11. Juli 2008, Beijing,China (Bd. XXXVII Part B5, S. 933–938). Lemmer, The Netherlands: ReedBusiness - Geo.
Wever, R. A. (1979). The circadian system of man, results of experiments undertemporal isolation. New York, NY: Springer.
Willis, C. J. (1989a). The measurement of mutual nonverbal coordination in thepsychotherapeutic process: An exploratory study of the development of an in-dex for clinical use. Unveröffentlichte Dissertation, University of Massachusetts,Massachusetts.
Willis, C. J. (1989b). The measurement of mutual nonverbal coordination in thepsychotherapeutic process: An exploratory study of the development of an indexfor clinical use. Dissertation Abstracts International, 50, 144.
Woodall, W. G. & Burgoon, J. K. (1981). The effect of nonverbal synchrony onmessage comprehension and persuasiveness. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 5(4), 207–223.
Yabar, Y., Johnston, L., Miles, L. & Peace, V. (2006). Implicit behavioral mimicry:Investigating the impact of group membership. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,30 (3), 97–113.
Literatur 183
Yeo, I.-K. & Johnson, R. A. (2000). A new family of power transformations toimprove normality or symmetry. Biometrika, 87, 957–959.
Youngblade, L. M. & Belsky, J. (1992). Parent-child antecedents of 5-year-olds’close friendships: A longitudinal analysis. Developmental Psychology, 28, 700–713.
Youngblade, L. M., Park, K. A. & Belsky, J. (1993). Measurement of young child-ren’s close friendship: A comparison of two independent assessment systems andtheir associations with attachment security. International Journal of BehavioralDevelopment, 16, 563–587.
Yule, G. U. (1926). Why do we sometimes get nonsense-correlations between time-series? – A study in sampling and the nature of time-series. Journal of the RoyalStatistical Society, 89 (1), 1–63.
