+ All Categories
Home > Documents > LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF DRY FLOOR PANEL...

LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF DRY FLOOR PANEL...

Date post: 14-Mar-2019
Category:
Upload: tranthu
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
23
LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF DRY FLOOR PANEL SYSTEM TE CHEI YEAN UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
Transcript

LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF DRY FLOOR

PANEL SYSTEM

TE CHEI YEAN

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA

iii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I would like to thank all the parties who have given the co-operation to me in

writing this project report. I am sincerely greatful to my supervisor, Dr. Redzuan

Abdullah for his continuous support and guidance in this project. He has set a high

standard for the conduct of this study and his valuable suggestions and guidance have

provided me the motivation needed to complete this project report. I would like to thank

Dr Koh Heng Boon for giving me valuable advice and opinions.

Besides, I thank my family and friends for their supports and encouragement. Their

encouragement provided the often-needed motivation and inspirations for me to push

through the hard times. Last but not least, I thank to my dearest Mr EK Lim for his

continued support and concern throughout in this project report preparation. I would

also like to acknowledge the contributions of those who have helped either directly or

indirectly in the completion of this project.

iv

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the application of finite element modelling to study structural

performances of a dry floor system, consisting of plywood attached to top layer of

profiled steel sheet by self-drilling, self-tapping screws connector. Parametric study was

carried out by using various profiled steel sheet thickness, plywood thickness and

different geometry of profiled steel sheet. The preliminary FE model was validated

using experimental study. Parametric studies showed 96.72% increased in flexural

stiffness when the thickness of profiled steel sheet was changed from 0.8mm to 1.8mm.

The increment of plywood thickness from 9.5mm to 25mm has increased flexural

stiffness of the slab up to 23.00% in a quadratic form. Different geometry of profiled

steel sheet affects the load carrying capacity of the proposed dry floor panel where SDP

gives 1.42 to 1.49 higher in flexural stiffness per 1 unit area of steel compared with

PEVA. This means SDP profile will give more economical design compared with

PEVA profile. A theoretical formula was proposed to predict the flexural strength of the

slab. Moment capacity predicted from FE analysis preformed 1.06 safety factor over

theoretical formula and 1.40 over experimental results. FE analysis had indicated high

degree of accuracy and revealed that the prediction moment capacity using FE analysis

and theoretical formula are conservative and safe for design purpose.It can be concluded

that the proposed dry floor panel has a great potential to be exploited as alternative

flooring system.

Keywords: Profiled steel sheet; dry flooring system; composite panel

v

ABSTRAK

Kertas kerja ini membincangkan penggunaan kaedah permodelan unsur

terhingga untuk mengkaji kelakuan struktur sistem lantai kering. Cadangan sistem lantai

kering ini terdiri daripada papan lapis disambungkan ke atas plat keluli berprofil secara

mekanikal mudah dengan mengunakan skru. Kajian parameter melingkungi kesan

ketebalan plat keluli berprofil, kesan ketebalan papan lapis and kesan bentuk geometri

yang berbeza ke atas keupayaan galas beban sistem lantai kering. Analisis permodelan

pertama diselaraskan dengan keputusan eksperimen. Daripada kajian parameter dengan

analisis unsur terhingga, kesan ketebalan plat keluli berprofil menunjukkan pertambahan

sebanyak 96.72% dari segi kekuatan lenturan apabila tebal plat keluli berprofil bertukar

dari 0.8mm ke 1.8mm. Manakala kesan ketebalan papan lapis hanya menunjukkan

pertambahan sebanyak 23% apabila tebal papan lapis bertukar dari 9.5mm ke 25mm.

Profil SDP lebih kuat sebanyak factor 1.42 ke 1.49 berbanding profil PEVA dari segi

kekuatan lenturan per unit keluasan profil . Ini menunjukkan geometri SDP

menonjolkan rekabentuk yang lebih ekonomi. Keupayaan moment kapasiti yang

berdasarkan analisis unsur terhingga mensyorkan faktor 1.06 berbanding dengan

keupayaan moment kapasiti yang dikira melalui penggunaan formula teori bahan

elastik; dan faktor sebanyak 1.40 berbanding dengan keupayaan moment kapasiti yang

dikira berdasarkan keputusan eksperimen. Analisis penggunaan unsur terhingga

menunjukkan nilai ketetapan yang tinggi. Secara bandingan dengan keputusan

eksperimen, anggaran moment kapasiti mengunakan kaedah unsur terhingga dan

formula teori bahan adalah selamat digunakan dalam proses rekabentuk. Sebagai

kesimpulan, cadangan sistem papak kering mempunyai potensi yang tinggi

diesploitasikan sebagai alternatif sistem lantai konvensional sekarang.

vi

Kata Kekunci: Plat keluli berprofil; lantai kering; komposit

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER SUBJECT PAGE

DECLARATION ii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iii ABSTRACT iv ABSTRAK v TABLE OF CONTENTS vi LIST OF FIGURES ix LIST OF TABLES xii LIST OF SYMBOLS xiii LIST OF APPENDICES xiv CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Current Development of Construction

Technology in Malaysia 1

1.2 Problem Statement 4

1.3 Aim and Objectives 4

1.4 Scope of research 5

CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE RIVIEW

2.1 Overview of Dry Floor System 6

2.1.1 W.H. Baruzzaman et al (2003) 8

2.1.2 E.Ahmed, W.H. Baruzzaman and H.D. Wright (2002) 9

vii

2.1.3 E.Ahmed, W.H. Baruzzaman and H.D. Wright (2000) 10

2.2 The Proposed Dry Floor System –

Profile Steel Sheeting Plywood System 11

2.3 Profiled Steel Sheet 13

2.3.1 Property of Material 14

2.4 Laminated Plywood 16

2.5 Nonlinear Analysis

20

2.5.1 Geometrically Nonlinear Analysis 20

2.5.2 Nonlinear Boundary Conditions 22

2.5.3 Materially Nonlinear Analysis 23

CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY

3.1 Introduction 24

3.2 Experimental Study of the Profile Steel Sheeting Plywood

(PSSP) Dry Floor Panel 25

3.2.1 Experimental Dry Floor Panel Specimen Design 26

3.2.2 Loading and Instrumentation 27

3.2.3 Test Observation and Results 28

3.2.4 Failure Mode 29

3.3 Preliminary FE Model 30

3.3.1 Modelling of Profiled Steel Sheeting 30

3.3.2 Modelling of Plywood 34

3.3.3 Modelling of Connector 35

3.3.4 Boundary Condition 36

3.3.5 Nonlinear Analysis Control 37

viii

CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1 Introduction 40

4.2 Preliminary Model Results 40

4.2.1 Load-Deflection Behaviour 43

4.2.2 Von Misses Stress Contour 44

4.2.3 Stress – Strain Diagram 46

4.3 Discussion on Results of Preliminary Model 47

4.4 Results and Discussion on Parametric Study 50

4.4.1 Effects of Thickness of Profiled Steel Sheet 51

4.4.2 Effects of Thickness of Plywood 53

4.4.3 Effect of Different Geometric Profile of

Profiled Steel Sheet 55

4.5 Moment Capacity of Proposed Dry Floor Panel 58

CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Conclusions 60

5.2 Recommendations 62

REFERENCES 63

APPENDIX A1-A5 66

ix

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE NO. DESCRIPTIONS PAGE

2.1 Structural component of BCCFP panel system developed

by W.H.Baharuzzman(1994) 7

2.2 Modified Bondek II profiled steel sheet (W.H.Baharuzzman, 2003) 14

2.3 Steelon Deck Plate SDP-51 geometrical dimensions 15

2.4 Graph of stress-strain of plywood (Curry and Hearmon, 1974) 18

2.5 Illustration of geometrically nonlinear behaviour of two simple

structures 21

2.6 Illustration of nonlinear boundary condition of a simple structure 22

3.1 Cross section dimension of profiled steel sheet type of SDP-51 26

3.2 Cross section dimension of profiled steel sheet type of PEVA 26

3.3 Location of transducer on plan view 28

3.4 Typical load-deflection responses at the centre position of the

panel 29

x

3.5 Finite Element idealization of model SDP 08S18P 31

3.6 Comparison between actual and modelling illustration 32

3.7 Input of profiled steel sheet as thick shell element (QTS4) in

LUSAS Modeller Softwore 32

3.8 Eccentricity definitions in a thick shell element 33

3.9 Screw connectors were modelled as a joint element with no

rotational stiffness in Lusas Modeller Software 36

3.10 Support definition in the proposed FE modelling 37

3.11 Nonlinear analysis controls in the proposed FE modelling 39

4.1 Conversion of point load to uniform distributed area load 41

4.2 Deformed shape of the proposed dry floor system under load 43

4.3 Comparison between experimental and FE analysis for flexural

Load-deflection behaviour for model SDP0.8PLY18P 44

4.4 Contour diagram of the Von Misses stress during load factor 0.2.

Critical stress were prorogated from point of applied line load 45

4.5 Contour diagram of the Von Misses stress during load factor 0.9 46

4.6 Yield stress strain diagram of the proposed model of a point in the

mid span 47

4.7 Elastic behaviour of the experimental and FE model 49

4.8 Flexural load-deflection behaviour of the proposed dry floor system

with different thickness of profiled steel sheet. 52

4.9 Load increments at 18mm deflection for different profiled steel sheet

thickness. 52

4.10 Flexural load-deflection behaviour of the proposed dry floor system

xi

with different thickness of plywood 54

4.11 Comparison load carrying capacity for variable profiled steel sheet

and plywood thickness 55

4.12 Geometry dimensions for Model SDP and PEVA 56

4.13 Equivalent area loads per 1 unit effective second moment plotted

against deflection 57

xii

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE NO. DESCRIPTIONS PAGE

Table 1.1 5 major systems promoting in IBS system in Malaysia

Construction industry. (Economic Planning Unit, Prime

Minister’s Department, 2003) 2

Table 2.1 Test Speciment 8

Table 2.2 Properties of Bondek II profiled steel sheet 15

Table 2.3 Properties of SDP-51 profiled steel sheet 15

Table 3.1 The proposed test program carried out by Mohd Hanif (2006) 25

Table 3.2 Steel Properties used in FE model 33

Table 3.3 Elastic-plastic Strain for Plywood Material used in FE Model 34

Table 4.1 Flexural stiffness value for various thickness of profiled steel

sheet in elastic 53

Table 4.2 Flexural stiffness values for various thickness of plywood

in elastic region 54

Table 4.3 Section properties for different type of profiled steel sheet 56

Table 4.4 Comparison flexural stiffness (kN/m2/m4) for two different

xiii

geometry profile of profiled steel sheet type PEVA and SDP 57

Table 4.5 Moment capacity of dry floor panel for various thicknesses

of profiled steel sheet. 59

LIST OF SYMBOLS

SYMBOL DESCRIPTIONS

mm

N/mm2

kNm

kN/m2

MPa

f

z

I

E

I’

t

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Milimeter

Newton/ milimeter square

kiloNewton meter

kiloNewton/ meter square

Mega Pascal

Mode of rupture

distance from neutral axis

second moment of area of each element

modulus of elasticity of each element

second moment of area of the full cross-section

total thickness of steel sheet

xiv

LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX DESCRIPTIONS PAGE

A.1 Calculation Bending Moment Capacity based on Elastic Section Properties for Model of specimen SDP 08S18P 66

A.2 Calculation Bending Moment Capacity based

on Elastic Section Properties for Model of specimen SDP 10S18P 69

A.3 Calculation Bending Moment Capacity based on Elastic Section Properties for Model of specimen SDP 12S18P 72

A.4 Calculation Bending Moment Capacity based on Elastic Section Properties for Model of specimen SDP 15S18P 75

A.5 Calculation Bending Moment Capacity based on Elastic Section Properties for Model of specimen SDP 18S18P 78

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Current Development of Construction Technology in Malaysia

The construction industry plays a big role in Malaysia’s development and is

expected to be a major contributor towards the realisation of Vision 2020. Thus, as

envisaged in the Third Outline Perspective Plan (OPP3) 2001-2010, the industry is

expected to grow at 6.6% per annum and contribute 3.1% to the GDP in the year 2010

(Shahrul Nizar Shaari and Elias Ismail, 2003). Unfortunately, local construction industry

technology still dominated by conventional cast in-situ reinforced concrete system,

which is very labour-intensive method. The reasons why local construction player

would not opt for alternative methods are caused by the followings factors:

a) Lack of knowledge in alternative construction technique resulting in

fear and avoidance.

b) Cheap rates and abundant supply of labours sourced from

neighbouring countries.

c) Failure of local players to have proper technology transfer – resulting

in problems during production and installation.

d) High prices of systems caused by high set-up costs, low demand and

designs originally meant for in-situ construction.

2

Nevertheless, the cheap labour and huge supply of labour in the local

construction industry would not last forever and a disruption of the supply would

generate huge problems to the industry; as experience in 2002. Also, besides increasing

the outflow of Ringgit to foreign economies, dependency on foreign labours also brings

about negative impact to the nation, socially and culturally.

Because of this, it is important for local industry players to begin sourcing

alternatives to labour-intensive construction methods. Instead of “builder” the

contractors should be functioning as “assemblers” at sites. CIDB actively promoting the

usage of new technologies know as “Industrialised Building System” (IBS).

IBS can be defined as products, systems and techniques used in making

construction less labour- orientated, faster as well as quality controlled. It generally

involves prefabricated products – factory manufactured elements that are transported to

the construction sites and erected. IBS can be structurally divided into 5 major groups:

Table 1.1: 5 major systems promoting in IBS system in Malaysia construction industry

(Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister’s Department, 2003)

Group 1:

Precast Concrete Framing,

Panel and Box Systems

The most common IBS are the precast concrete

elements, precast concrete columns, beams, slabs

walls, “3-D” components ( e.g. balconies, staircases,

toilets, lift chambers, refuse chambers), lightweight

precast concrete, as well as permanent concrete

formworks.

Group 2:

Steel Formwork Systems

Considered as one of the “low-level” or the “least

prefabricated” IBS as the systems generally involve

site casting. Thus, the question of the structural

3

quality control still arises. Nevertheless, these

systems, tunnel forms, tilt-up systems, beams and

columns moulding forms, a dn permanent steel

formwork (metal decks) do offer high quality

finishes and fast construction with less site labour

and material requirement.

Group 3:

Steel Framing Systems

Commonly used with precast concrete, slabs, steels

columns and beams have always been the popular

choice and used extensively in the fast-track

construction of skyscrapers. Recent development in

these types of IBS includes the increased usage of

light steel trusses cocsisting of cost-effective

profiled cold-formed channels and steel portal frame

systems as an alternative to the heavier traditional

hot-rolled sections.

Group 4:

Timber Framing Systems

Among the products listed in this category are

timber building frames and timber roof trusses.

Group 5:

Brickwork Systems

The construction method of suing the conventional

bricks has been revolutionised by the development

and usage of interlocking concrete masonry units

(CMU) abd lighlight concrete blocks. The tedious

and time-consuming traditional brick-laying tasks

are greatly simplified by the usage of these effective

alternative solutions

The main benefits offered by the usage of these systems are:

a) High quality of finished products and minimal wastages due to factory-

controlled prefabrication environment.

b) Elimination of conventional timber formworks and great reduction of props

through the usage of prefabricated elements or system formwork for site casting.

4

c) Sturdy and safe platforms provided by the prefabricated elements.

d) Faster completion due to the introduction of components replacing in-situ

construction.

e) Neater, cleaner and safer sites due to reductions of construction debris, site

workers and materials.

f) Lower total construction cot due to all of the above.

1.2 Problem Statement

Recent development of alternative construction system has encouraged studies

on various innovative lightweight composite structural flooring panel systems. One of

the lightweight systems is dry floor panel consisting plywood attached to top layer of profiled

steel sheet by self-drilling, self-tapping screws connector. Two major structural components

of the system, profile steel sheets and plywood are both readily available material in

market and in pre-fabricated form. The new system is introduced to meet IBS concepts,

which is making construction less labour-orientated, faster and better quality control.

1.3 Aim and Objectives

The proposed dry floor system consists of plywood attached to top layer of profiled

steel sheet by self-drilling, self-tapping screws connector. The aim of the study was to

investigate the structural performance of the system using various profiled steel sheet

thickness, plywood thickness and different geometry of profiled steel sheet by using finite

element method. In order to achieve the aim of the study, 4 objectives were set as below:

a) To develop a finite element modeling for dry floor system by using Lusas

Modeller Finite Element Software.

5

b) To perform non-linear FE analysis to determine the behavior and load carrying

capacity of the proposed dry floor system.

c) Parametric study on the effect of the thickness of profiled steel sheet, thickness

of plywood and effect of different geometry of profiled steel sheet on the load carrying

capacity of the proposed system.

d) To compare bending moment capacity obtained from FE analysis and

experimental results with theoretical formula based on elastic section properties.

1.4 Scope of research

The scopes of this study are:

a) The FE model was in 3-Dimensional.

b) Only material non-linearity included in the analysis.

61

a) The load carrying capacity of the proposed dry floor panel increased with the

increment of the profiled steel sheet. The capacity increased as much as 96.72%

when the thickness increased from 0.8mm to 1.8mm.

b) The load carrying capacity of the proposed dry floor panel increased by

thickness of plywood by a value 23% when thickness increased from 9.5mm to

25mm.

c) Load carrying capacity increased linearly with the profiled steel thickness and

plywood thickness. The profiled steel thickness give higher rate of load carrying

capacity compared to the plywood thickness.

d) Different geometry of profiled steel sheet affects the load carrying capacity of

the proposed dry floor panel. SDP profile gives higher flexural stiffness per 1

unit

area of steel section compared to PEVA profile. This means SDP profile will

give more economical design compared with PEVA profiled at same load

carrying capacity.

e) Moment capacity predicted from FE analysis had performed acceptable results

compared with the proposed theoretical formula and experimental results. FE

results with 1.06 times higher than theoretical results indicated high degree of

accuracy of FE analysis. Whilst the average experimental results with 1.4 times

higher than the theoretical results. This revealed that prediction of moment

capacity using FE analysis and theoretical formula are conservative and safe for

design purpose.

62

5.2 Recommendations

Several recommendations are outlined below to improve the study of the

proposed dry floor panel in future:

a) In this study, the geometric profile of the proposed dry floor panel had been

modelled using assembly of 3-D isotropic plates. The 3-D model is much time

consuming. It is recommended that the profiled steel sheet should be modelled as

an equivalent orthotropic plate of uniform thickness in order to reduce

computation time and memory.

b) The effect of connector on the behaviour of proposed panel should be studied

in future. This includes the effect of the spacing of the connectors and the load-

slip relationship, in order to gain better understanding on the interaction between

plywood and profiled steel sheet.

c) The contact condition between profiled steel sheet and plywood should be

taken into consideration in future study. It is suggested that an appropriate

surface contact condition shall be inserted between profiled steel sheet and

plywood by assigning slideline dataset to the required lines or surfaces. It is

expected that the contact condition may contribute to the partial composite

action.

63

6.0 REFERENCES

Ahmed E. (1996). Behaviour of Profiled Steel Sheet Dry Board Panel. MSc Thesis.

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.

Ahmed E.(1999). Behaviour of Profiled Steel Sheet Dry Board Folded Plate Structures.

PhD Thesis. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan,

Malaysia.

Ahmed E, Wan Badaruzzaman WH and Khalim AR (1996). Composite Partial

Interaction of Profiled Steel Sheeting Dry Board Floor Subject to Transverse

Loading. Proceeding of the CIB International Conference on Construction

Modernisation and Education. Beijing, China. Pp. 1–6.

Ahmed E, W.H. Wan Badaruzzaman and H.D. Wright (2000). Experimental and Finite

Element Study of Profiled Steel Sheet Dry Board Folded Plate Structures. Thin-

Walled Structures. Volume (38):Pp. 125–143.

Ahmed E, W.H. Baruzzaman and H.D. Wright (2002). Two-way Bending Behaviour of

Profiled Steel Sheet Dry Board Composite Panel System. Thin Wall Structures

Volume (40):Pp. 971-990.

Basri H, Wan Badaruzzaman WH, Zain MFM and Mannan MA (1998). Reuse of Waste

Oil Palm Shell for Concrete Infill in Bondek/Cemboard Panels. Proceeding of

the 4th International Symposium on Waste Management Problems in Agro

Industries.Vol. II. Intanbul, Turkey. Pp. 173–180.

Che Husain K(2000). The Behaviour of Vibration of Profiled Steel Sheet Dry Board

Floor. BSc Thesis. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor Darul

Ehsan, Malaysia.

64

DIN 18807 Part 2 (1987). Trapezoidal Sheeting in Building: Trapezoidal Steel Sheeting:

Determination of Load Bearing Capacity by Testing. Berlin: Beuth Verlag

GmbH.

Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister’s Department (2003).The Third Outline

Perspective Plan 2001-2010. http://www.epu.jpm.my.

Ferdinand P.Beer, E.Russell Johnston, JR., John T.Dewolf (2006). Mechanics of

Materials, Fourth Edition. New York: Mc Graw Hill.

Ismail A, Wan Badaruzzaman WH, Nasir N, Osman SA, Yee LNM (2000). The Study

on Water-Resistant System for Bondek II/Cemboard System. Proceeding of the

2nd International Conference ICAST. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Pp. 1801–1808.

J.R. Barber (2001). Intermediate Mechanics of Materials. New York: Mc Graw Hill.

LUSAS Finite Element analysis User Manual

Osman SA, Wan Badaruzzaman WH, Nasir N, Ismail A, Mohd Nor MJ, Seng WY,

Yung LC (2000). Sound Insulation Properties of Bondek II/Cemboard

Composite Flooring Panel (BCCFP) System. Proceeding of the 2nd

International Conference ICAST. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Pp. 1521–1530.

Shahrul Nizar Shaari and Elias ISmail (2003). Promoting the Use of the Industrialised

Building Systems (IBS) and Modular Coordination (MC) in the Malaysia

Construction Industry. In: The Institute of Engineers, Malaysia. Buletin Bulanan

IJM Jurutera. Malayisa. Malaysia: The Institute of Engineers, Pp. 14 – 16.

Wan Badaruzzaman WH (1994). The Behaviour of Profiled Steel Sheet/Dry Board

System. PhD Thesis. University of Wales, College of Cardiff , United Kingdom.

65

Wan Badaruzzaman WH and Wright HD (1998). Lightweight Thin Walled Profiled

Steel Sheeting/Dry Board (PSSDB) Composite Flooring System. Proceeding of

the 2nd International Conference on Thin-Walled Structures. Singapore. Pp.

355–365.

Wan Badaruzzaman WH, Shodiq HM, Zain MFM, Ismail A, Sahari J (2001). Load

Bearing Fire Resistance Performance of Profiled Steel Sheet Dry Board Flooring

Panel. Proceeding of the International Conference on Construction Technology.

Sabah, Malaysia. Pp. 10–21.

Wan Badaruzzaman WH, Shodiq HM, Khalim, AR (2002). The Effect of Concrete Infill

and Topping to the Structural Behaviour of Profiled Steel Sheeting Dry Board

(PSSDB) Flooring System. Proceeding of the World Engineering Congress and

Exhibition (WEC 2002). Sarawak, Malaysia. Pp. 245-247.

W.H. Baruzzaman, M.F.M Zain, A.M. Akhand, E.Ahmed (2003). Dry Board as Load

Bearing Element in the Profiled Steel Sheet Dry Board Floor Panel System -

Structural Performance and Applications. Construction and Building Materials

Volume (17):pp. 289-297.

Wright HD and Evan HR (1986). Profiled Steel Sheeting for the Replacement of Timber

Flooring in Building Renovation. SERC Grant GR/D/76875.

W.T Curry and R.F.S. Hearmon (1974). The Strength Properties of Timber. Medical &

Technical Publishing Co. Ltd, St. Leonard’s House, Lancaster, England


Recommended