Date post: | 07-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | kris-kirsten |
View: | 221 times |
Download: | 0 times |
8/6/2019 Local Buckling of Pultruded Beam(Bank LC)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/local-buckling-of-pultruded-beambank-lc 1/7
Construction and Budding Materials, Vol. 9, NO. 6, pp. 325-331, 1995
Copyright 0 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd
Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved
095&0618/95/$10.00+0.00
0 9 5 0 - 0 6 1 8 ( 9 5 ) 0 0 0 5 1 - 8
Local buckling of pultruded beams -
nonlinearity, anisotropy and inhomogeneity
Lawrence C. Bank, Jiansheng Yin and Murali Nadipelli
Department of Civil Engineering, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC
20064, USA
Received 21 October 1994; accepted 13 February 1995
Local buckling of pultruded fibre-reinforced plastic beams is discussed. The paper focuses on three
issues related to the prediction of buckling loads both from experimental data and from analytical
and numerical approaches, viz. nonlinearity, anisotropy and inhomogeneity. Experimental data
obtained from full-scale buckling tests are reviewed and a method proposed for estimating the
buckling stress in pultruded beams. Analytical studies based on classical orthotropic plate bucklingtheory are used to determine the edge restraint coefficient for pultruded beams and also to show
the influence of the in-plane material properties on the buckling loads. Numerical studies using the
finite element method in which inhomogeneous material properties in the beam cross-section are
considered are used to give predictions of buckling loads of the beams. Although the paper focuses
on local buckling of pultruded beams, it raises issues which are relevant to the analysis of pultruded
material structures of all types.
Keywords: pultruded beams; fibre-reinforced plastics; finite element analysis
Pultruded fibre-reinforced plastic (FRP) profile sections
have been produced for over 20 years in the United
States and in Europe. In recent years there has been
increased interest in the use of pultruded profiles in theconstruction industry for load-bearing structural appli-
cations in both building systems and bridges’. Primarily
motivated by their resistance to corrosion, engineers are
now discovering additional benefits of pultruded com-
posites which may include light weight, electromagnetic
transparency, damage tolerance, formability and
installed cost. Recent improvements in manufacturing
technology, particularly in the pultrusion method
(although also in the various resin transfer moulding
methods), have enabled the production of large cross-
sections (in the range of 1 m by 1 m) with relatively thick
walls (in the range of 25 mm) at relatively low cost ($4
to $6 per kg). Such large sized members are needed for
full-scale load-bearing civil engineering applications. The
low cost coupled with potentially low installation costs
due to light weight and customized profile shapes can
make pultruded composites viable structural materials.
Regardless of the form of the eventual profile, prior
to use as a structural component, a pultruded profile
currently needs to be tested at full-scale to validate its
structural performance. This is because at the present
time ‘reasonable doubt’ exists as to whether or not
structural behaviour can be predicted from knowledge
of the profile geometry and coupon test data. The pur-
pose of the current paper is to attempt to shed somelight on why such ‘doubts’ exist. Recently, a series of
controlled and extensively instrumented full-scale flex-
ural tests on a variety of pultruded beams was con-
ducted at the Catholic University of AmericazA. The
tests were conducted to investigate local buckling andultimate failure of the compression flange of commer-
cially produced wide flange I-shaped beam sections
when loaded in flexure. The purpose of the testing was
to develop a robust test methodology, to obtain test
data on local buckling and failure behaviour, and to
determine whether analytical and numerical methods
could be used to predict buckling loads based on
‘knowledge of the profile geometry and coupon test
data’. Although prior flexural testing of pultruded
beams has been conducted’ this work does not contain
the experimental detail needed in order to gain an in-
depth understanding of the phenomena discussed in this
paper. Since local buckling is one of the governing
design criteria for pultruded beams it was chosen for
this in-depth study. Other design criteria of importance
are lateral-torsional buckling6, ultimate failure, deflec-
tion, vibration, connection capacity and local bearing
capacity.
To meet these objectives a set of studies was con-
ducted to assess the significance of a number of factors
related to the local buckling characteristics of the pul-
truded beams tested. These were (i) the determination of
buckling load and buckling stress from experimental
nonlinear flange strain data, (ii) the effect of anisotropy
of the pultruded material and the edge restraint pro-vided by the web/flange junction, and (iii) the effect of
Construction and Building Materials 1995 Volume 9 Number 6 325
8/6/2019 Local Buckling of Pultruded Beam(Bank LC)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/local-buckling-of-pultruded-beambank-lc 2/7
Local buckling of pultruded beams: L.C. Bank et al.
in-plane material inhomogeneity in the flanges and the
webs of the pultruded profile.
Nonlinearity
Tests were conducted on three types of standard pul-
truded FRP wide flange I-beams: (i) vinylester beams of
the 203 mm (8”) high and wide by 9.5 mm (3/8”) thick
series, (ii) polyester beams of the 203 mm (8”) high and
wide by 9.5 mm (3/8”) thick series, and (iii) vinylester
beams of the 203 mm (8”) high and wide by 12.7 mm
(112”) thick series. For identification purposes these will
be referred to as V 318, P 3/8, and V l/2, respectively.
Tests were conducted in a fixture especially designed to
produce local buckling in the beams in a controlled
fashion and to prevent ‘undesirable’ local instability
and failure modes from occurring. The beams were
simply supported and tested in four-point bending at a
span of 2743 mm (9 ft) with an interior constantmoment span of 1219 mm (4 ft). The beams were
monitored with strain and displacement indicators.
Full details of the testing methodology and descriptions
of the buckling and failure behaviour of the beams are
described in References 2-4. The load at which local
buckling occurred in the experiments was determined
from strain data obtained from back-to-back strain
gauges bonded on the top and bottom surfaces of the
compression flanges. The difference between the top
and bottom surface strain gauge data provides a conve-
nient way of detecting the instability in the compression
flange. A typical plot of the difference in strain data (S-
2-S-3) from ‘back-to-back’ strain gauges, one upper-
side (S-2) and one on the under-side (S-3) of the
compression flange, is shown in Figure 1 for one of the
P 318 beams (identified as P8-1 in Figure I). As can be
seen from Figure 1 the bifurcation in the strain data
occurs gradually over a range of load values and a
method is needed to precisely determine the buckling
load from plots of this type. Two methods were con-
sidered: an ‘estimation’ method and an ‘analytical’
method.
portion of the load-strain curve until it intersects the
straight line extending from the final post-buckled
(large deformation) linear portion of the curve. The
load thus obtained is referred to as the ‘estimated’ buck-
ling load. It is this load that has been previously
reported as the buckling load’s3 for the beams tested.
Buckling data for pultruded column tests have also
been obtained using this method7. Previously reported
local buckling data for beams’ was obtained by visual
observation of large post-buckled deformation and
therefore also represents this ‘estimated’ value.
Following careful examination of photographic data
of the buckled beams, such as that shown in Figure 2,
and considering the fact that the load versus strain
difference has a gradual slope change as the buckling
phenomenon initiates and then progresses into the post-
bucked regime, it was felt that a procedure was needed
to determine the ‘initial’ buckling load. This initial
buckling load was, therefore, determined analyticallyfrom the point at which the change in the initial linear
slope of the load versus strain difference plot exceeded a
predetermined value. A value of 10% slope change was
used in this study. This value was the ‘lowest’ value that
could confidently be used to identify buckling that was
not adversely influenced by the ‘noise’ of the strain data
obtained from the experiments. A typical plot of the
change of slope versus load is shown in Figure 3.
Average values of the estimated and the initial buck-
ling loads for the three types of beams tested are given
in Tuble 1. From the data in Tuble 1 it can be seen that
the percentage difference between the initial buckling
loads and the estimated buckling loads is 22%, 33% and
27% for beams V 3/X, P 318 and V l/2, respectively.
Photographs (taken during the testing) of the post-
buckled deformation (for example Figure 2) show
between three and four buckle half-wavelengths in the
In the estimation method the buckling load is deter-
mined graphically (or numerically) from the ‘knee’ in
the difference strain versus the load plot. The locationof the knee is determined by extending the initial linear Figure 2 Post-buckled deformation of a pultruded beam
120 I I I I 1 I I I r110 -
100 -
90 - estimated buckling______________--___~_-----~__‘--_________---------~
5
60 -
70
_.m- ’initial buckling
60-0d 50
- -f--------------------------------------------------------:
s 40 Pa- 1
30 . s-s3
20
f10
0’ ’ 1 I I I 1 1 I I
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 60 0 900 1000
Microstrain
201
-20 ’ / / 1 I I ! I I
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 60 90
Load (kN)
Figure 1 Load YL’~SUStrain difference plot Figure 3 Change of slope VP~SU.Soad plot
7 1
/10 0
326 Construction and Building Materials 1995 Volume 9 Number 6
8/6/2019 Local Buckling of Pultruded Beam(Bank LC)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/local-buckling-of-pultruded-beambank-lc 3/7
Local buckling of pultruded beams: L.C. Bank et al.
Table 1 Experimental loads and stresses
Beam Initial buckling Estimated buckling Ultimate failure Initial buckling Estimated buckling
load, P,, load, P,,, load, P,,, stress, 4, stress, cr,,,
CkN) (W (kN WPa) WPa)
v 3/8 71.1 87.3 98.3 66.6 121.0P 318 66.9 89.0 96.1 62.6 123.1v II2 140.1 177.9 189.4 102.7 192.5
constant moment region of the beams. It is felt that the
lower ‘initial’ buckling load realistically represents the
onset of ‘elastic’ buckling, while the ‘estimated’ buck-
ling load is that which exists when the section has been
loaded into the irreversible post-buckled regime (see the
large post-buckled flange deformation shown in Figure
2). Loading, unloading and reloading tests show that
the buckling load is significantly reduced when the
beam is reloaded after having been loaded into the post-
buckled regime2. It can therefore be concluded that the
nonlinearity seen in the expermental data is caused byboth material nonlinearity due to accumulating mater-
ial damage and geometric nonlinearity. Although the
pultruded beams may appear to be undamaged follow-
ing unloading after an excursion into the post-buckled
regime, this is not the case, and designers are cautioned
against utilizing the post-buckling capacity. Although
deflection limits will usually govern beam design in
typical applications it is nevertheless vital to understand
the phenomenon of local buckling in pultruded beams
so that design codes can be developed for pultruded
structures. Based on the above, it is recommended that
the appropriate method for determining buckling loadsfrom strain data of this type be the ‘analytical’ method
and not the ‘estimation’ method. A simplified graphical
version of this method can also be used whereby the
buckling load is determined approximately by observing
where the onset of nonlinearity in the initial linear por-
tion of the load-strain difference plot occurs. For com-
parison purposes the average ultimate failure loads of
the beams are also shown in Tuble 1. Since the beams
fail in a number of different modes2s3 it is not possible
to directly compare the buckling loads to ultimate loads
for the purposes of safety factor estimation; however, it
is important to note that the ‘estimated’ buckling loads
are very close to the ultimate loads in all cases. Con-sequently, design approaches based on the ‘estimated’
buckling loads will have lower margins of safety and
should be avoided.
Following determination of the buckling loads a pro-
cedure is required to obtain the buckling stresses. Based
on experimental data in which it has been observed that
the distribution of axial strain across the compression
flange is nearly uniform’, the classical beam flexure for-
mula is used, vi z. CJ = o,,, = MC/Z , where cr,,,, is the
maximum flange compressive stress (shown throughout
this paper with a positive value for ease of presenta-
tion), M is the bending moment at the section, c is thedistance from the neutral axis to the compression face
in the elastic section, and Z is the second moment of
area of the elastic section. However, since a post-
buckled configuration exists at the ‘estimated’ buckling
load, a post-buckled version of the classical formula is
used in this case, viz. cr = My’lZ*, where y’ is the distance
to the face of the compression flange from the neutral
axis in the post-buckled section, and I* is the second
moment of area of the post-buckled section. The geom-
etry of the post-buckled section is obtained using an
‘effective width concept’ and experimental data for the
location of the post-buckled neutral axis’. For the four-
point-bend test geometry used M = Vu, where V = PI2
and c1 is the moment arm equal to 762 mm. The geo-
metric properties of beams V 318 and P 318 are I = 4.13
x 10’ mm4, I* = 3.24x 10’ mm4, c = 101.6 mm, y’ =
117.9 mm and for beams V l/2 are, I= 5.28 x 10’ mm’,
I* = 4.15 x 10’ mm4, c = 101.6 mm, y’ = 117.9 mm.
The calculated ‘initial’ and ‘estimated’ buckling
stresses are shown in Table 1. As can be seen from
Tuble I the ‘estimated’ stresses are significantly higher
than the ‘initial’ stresses. As mentioned previously the
‘initial’ stresses should be considered to be the ‘actual’
buckling stresses for the pultruded beams, while the
‘estimated’ buckling stresses give a measure of the
flange stress in the post-buckled configuration close to
failure of the beam. Therefore, while the initial bucklingstresses may be predicted using linear elastic analysis,
prediction of the ‘estimated’ buckling stresses will
require geometrically and materially nonlinear analysis.
Anistropy
In order to determine whether or not the experimental
‘initial’ buckling loads could be predicted from knowl-
edge of the section geometry and material properties an
analytical study was first conducted. Classical linear
elastic orthotropic plate buckling analysis” was per-
formed in which the compression flange was modelledas an orthotropic plate free on its longitudinal outer
edge and elastically restrained at its longitudinal inner
edge. This approach was chosen, as opposed to the
approach in which the buckling of the full-section is
modelled”, since it enables one to obtain a numerical
estimate of the extent of the web/flange interaction
through the edge restraint coefficient”.
The classical solution for an orthotropic plate which
is simply supported on its loaded edges is well docu-
mented’3a’4 and will not be repeated in detail. The solu-
tion is given in terms of the four in-plane independent
elastic constants of the orthotropic plate, E,,, E12, G,,,
v,~, the nondimensional buckling coefficient, K, =
N,b2/tiD,, the nondimensional edge restraint coefficient,
R = SblD,, the mode number, m, and the plate aspect
ratio, $ = u/b. N, is the in-plane load per unit width, b
Construction and Building Materials 1995 Volume 9 Number 6 327
8/6/2019 Local Buckling of Pultruded Beam(Bank LC)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/local-buckling-of-pultruded-beambank-lc 4/7
Local buckling of pultruded beams: L.C. Bank et al.
is the plate width, D2 = &t3/{ 12(1 - vlzv,,)} is the plate
transverse rigidity, S is the restraining moment along
the rotationally restrained edge per unit length per unit
rotation” and a is the plate length. The buckling stress
is obtained as, CT=NJt, where t is the plate thickness.
The classical solution is obtained via the Levy solution
technique and results in a nonlinear transcendental
equation which is solved numerically. Typical results
are shown in Figure 4, which shows the dependence of
the buckling coefficient on the aspect ratio and the edge
restraint coefficient. For the beams tested in the experi-
mental study2-4 4 = 12.
In order to perform the above calculations the in-
plane material properties of the pultruded plate mater-
ial are needed. Results presented in this paper are given
for two different sets of material properties: those based
on properties provided by the manufacturer” of the
pultruded sections and identified as ‘design data’ and
those based on properties obtained from coupon testsconducted at the Georgia Institute of Technology16 and
called ‘Georgia data’. The two sets of data are given in
Table 2. As can be seen from Table 2, these two sets of
data are different. This is not uncommon and stems
E =24.6GPa E =10.27GPaG:;=3.66GPa v:~=O.333
0.0 1 I I I I I 1
0 2 4 6 a 10 12 1 4
Length-width Ratio # (a/b)
Figure 4 Buckling curve for elastically restrained orthotropic plate
Table 2 Material property data
PropertyVinylester (V 318, V 112) Polyester (P 318)
Design data Georgia data Design data Georgia data
-%, (GPa) 17.0 24.6 17.0 24.0
J% (GPa) 8.0 10.3 7.0 1.5Gr2 (GPa) 2.5” 3.7 2.0 2.6
“12 0.3” 0.33 0.34 0.31
“Data not provided by manufacturer and obtained from other sources3
from the fact that manufacturer data is given for design
purposes and is generally conservative. Recent results”
have indicated that the inhomogeneity of pultruded
materials, which is due to the manufacturing process,
can lead to significant differences in property data
depending on coupon size and location within the
section.
As can be seen from the buckling curve shown in
Figure 4, prediction of the buckling stress depends onthe value of R, the edge restraint coefficient. The buck-
ling stress for the two limiting cases of a simply-sup-
ported edge (R = 0) and a clamped edge (R = -) can,
however, be obtained. Comparison between the experi-
mental buckling stresses and the limiting cases is shown
in Table 3 for the different beams and material property
data. From Table 3 it can be seen that the expermental
buckling stress falls between the two limiting cases. For
design purposes the assumption of a simply-supported
edge is a conservative assumption. Since stability will
often dictate the design of pultruded structures it may
be desired to take account of the edge restraint provided
by the web/flange intersection to increase the design
load on the beam. In order to obtain the value of the
edge restraint coefficient from the experimental data the
buckling curves can be plotted in an alternative form as
shown in Figure 5. From plots such as these the value
of the edge restraint coefficient and the number of
buckle half-wavelengths (mode number) can be
obtained from the experimentally determined buckling
stress. In Figure 5 the specific case of a V l/2 beam is
shown. From the experimentally determined buckling
stress of 102.7 MPa (see Table I) an edge restraint coef-
ficient of 1.06 is obtained. In addition, it can be seen
that the analytical solution predicts four buckle half-wavelengths (m = 4) which agrees with the expermental
Table 3 Comparison between theoretical and experimental buckling stresses
$=12,t=9.5mm @= 12, I = 12.7 mm
%Wrlmrnl %WUnrnl
(MPa) (MPa)
R=O R=m R=O R=cm
Georgia data Vinylester 36.8 146.4 260.3
Polyester 26.8 114.2 62.2 47.6 203.0 NA
Design data Vinylester 102.7
Polyester 20.7 93.4 62.2 38.0 171.7 NA
328 Construction and Building Materials 1995 Volume 9 Number 6
8/6/2019 Local Buckling of Pultruded Beam(Bank LC)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/local-buckling-of-pultruded-beambank-lc 5/7
2 5 0
2 2 5
2 0 0
3
$ ? 1 7 5
b-
In=8
wn=5 Vi n y l e s t e r
2 1 0 2 . 6
2 1 0 0
Lz
7 5
2 5
Design dataE,,=17.00GPa
E,,=8.00GPa
G,z=2.48GPa
” =0.3
a b=12b=95.25mmt=12.7mm
I-1
1
1 0 - l l o o 1 0 ' l o 2 l OA
Coefficient of Restraint R
Figure 5 Buckling curve used for determination of the edge restraintcoefficient
observations. Predictions of the edge restraint co-
efficient, R, and the mode number, m, for the beams
tested are given in Tuble 4. Experimental mode numbers
between 3 and 4 were obtained for all beams tested2s3.
The fact that the predictions with the design data show
mode numbers of 5 for the V 3/8 and P 3/8 beams sug-
gests that the design data are in fact lower than the true
material data. However, since the photographs of the
buckled deformation were taken in the post-buckled
range it is possible that the wavelengths may haveincreased (hence the decrease in mode number) from
those at the initiation of buckling due to damage of the
web/flange junction.
A parametric study was conducted to study the influ-
ence of the orthotropic material properties and the edge
restraint coefficient on the buckling behaviour. Figure 6
shows the value of the buckling stress as a function of
the variation in individual properties. The effect of rela-
tive changes in properties from the baseline properties
defined by the Georgia data (identified with superscript
‘0’) are shown. As can be seen from the figure the in-
plane shear modulus has the greatest effect on the buck-
ling stress. The effect of the edge restraint coefficientcan also be seen. The edge restraint coefficient can be
increased by increasing the size of the fillet region
between the web and the flange. It has been shown
Table 4 Analytical predictions of edge restraint coefficient and mode
number
t Gpcrrment m R
(mm) W’a)
9.5 66.6 3 0.75
Georgia Vinylester 12.7 102.7 3 0.19data
Polyester 9.5 62.6 4 I 06
Design Vinylester
data -~
Polyester
9.5 66.6 5 2.18
12.7 102.7 4 I .06
9.5 62.6 5 2.81
Local buckling of pultruded beams: L.C. Bank et al.
experimentally3 that such ‘customizing’ of the fillet
region significantly increases the buckling stress in pul-
truded beams.
Inhomogeneity
Composite materials are by definition inhomogeneous,
consisting of fibres in a surrounding matrix. Theoretical
analysis of composite materials on the macroscale is
based on the assumption of ‘statistical homogeneity’ in
a ‘representative volume element’ and the theory of
laminated plates. For composite materials made by pre-
cise lay up of prepregs these two assumptions appear to
be valid. However, for pultruded composite materials,
these assumptions cannot be made. Inspection of a
through-the-thickness section of a pultruded material
shows inhomogeneity on the scale of the part itself, con-
sisting of clusters of roving reinforcements in ‘arbitrary’
locations both in and out of the plane of the material”.Although some layering due to the presence of continu-
ous stand mats does exist it is not precise as in the case
of a laid-up composite plate. This is due to the nature
of the pultrusion process which has only approximate
control over the placement of reinforcements (fibres,
mats and fabrics) entering the die and no control during
the curing processes within the die. In particular,
inspection of a profile section shows that the reinforce-
ments tend to be most ‘arbitrary’ at the free edges and
at the junctions between plates. Often the region near a
free edge (up to 10 mm) may have fewer roving bundles
than the rest of the plate, while the reinforcement matsin the region of the junctions may be folded over in a
bunched fashion. Therefore test coupons are not taken
from these regions and their properties are ‘unknown’.
However, it can be assumed that the properties of these
sections are lower than the average properties of the
pultruded material in the flat parts of the profile. It has
1 . 2 0
1 . 2 5
1 . 2 0
1 . 1 5
Ob X
A, 1 1 0
b
0 1 . 0 5
3
l + z 1 . 0 0
iil 0.95
v) 0.90
2_9
0.85
S 0 8 0
a l
0 . 7 5
0 7 0 -J
0 . 5 0 6 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 9 1 . 0 1 . 1 1 . 2 1 . 3 1 . 4 1 . 5
Va n a b l e Ratio (EI1/EP,, E,,/Eiz, GI , / G , l , s / s ' )
Figure 6 Parametric representation of buckling stress
Construction and Building Materials 1995 Volume 9 Number 6 329
8/6/2019 Local Buckling of Pultruded Beam(Bank LC)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/local-buckling-of-pultruded-beambank-lc 6/7
Local buckling of pultruded beams: L.C. Bank et al.
additionally been shown I7 that even in the flat parts of
the section variations in stiffness properties may be as
much as 65% depending on location in the cross-section.
In order to account for the influence of the inhomo-
geneity on the local buckling behaviour of the pultruded
beam an elastic buckling analysis using the COSMOS
finite element code was performed. The finite element
method was chosen since it permits the user to vary the
material properties throughout the cross-section in an
arbitrary manner and also allows for precise modelling
of the beam support and loading conditions. Analytical
studies of in-plane inhomogeneous composite plates
are few and have considered only simplified distribu-
tions of the in-plane properties, primarily for theoretical
purposes’8*‘9.
The beams were modelled using anisotropic plate ele-
ments measuring 25.4 mm by 25.4 mm. Each cross-sec-
tion was divided into 24 elements. Lengthwise the 3048
mm long beam was divided into 120 elements giving atotal of 2880 elements in the beam model. To investi-
gate the effect of plate inhomogeneity different distribu-
tions of in-plane properties were chosen. The property
distributions chosen for the inhomogeneous cases are
shown in Figure 7. The distributions were chosen in an
attempt to account for lower properties at the edges and
the intersections and to investigate the influence of the
longitudinal properties versus the transverse properties.
They were refined by a trial-and-error method for pur-
poses of demonstrating the dependence of the buckling
load on material inhomogeneity. In all the distributions
shown in Figure 7 a constraint condition was chosen
such that the average property over the plate was equal
in value to the Georgia data. A baseline case in which
the average property was used throughout the cross-sec-
tion (uniform case) was used for comparison purposes.
Models were run in which either all or selected material
properties were varied while the remaining properties
were held uniform. In one model only the longitudinal
modulus, E,,, was varied according to the distributions
shown in Figure 7, while in the other case the transverse
and Poisson properties were varied while the longitudi-
nal modulus was held uniform. Such ‘arbitrary’ choices
of property variations are theoretically possible since allfour constants are independent; however, in reality it is
likely that there would be a relationship between these
properties due to the microstructure of the material.
Results of the finite element analyses are given in
Table 5. A number of interesting features can be seen in
I8
I I
Figure 7 Distribution of properties in the beam cross-sections
Gz#e2 Case 3
Table 5 Buckling loads (kN) of beams with variable material properties
V 318 P 3/8 v 112
Experimental buckling load71.1 69.9
FEM analysis buckling load (uniform properties)
88 70 I
FEM analysis buckling load (variable properties)
Case 1 70.0 80.0 67.7 47.7 156.6Case 2 62.0 89.0 70.0 56.2 141.5Case 3 69.0 84.6 16.2 59.5 160.0
330 Construction and Building Materials 1995 Volume 9 Number 6
8/6/2019 Local Buckling of Pultruded Beam(Bank LC)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/local-buckling-of-pultruded-beambank-lc 7/7
these results. The assumption of uniform properties
throughout the cross-section leads to FEM predictions
which are greater than the experimental loads. The FEMpredictions in which variable properties are used can be
very close to the experimental values (this, of course,
depends on the distributions chosen in Figure 7). The
influence of the transverse property variations is much
more significant than of the longitudinal property vari-
ation. In fact, the low predicted values of the P 318
beam in contrast to the V 3/8 beams (all properties
varied) is almost entirely a function of the transverse
property variation since the longitudinal modulus of
these beams is very similar (see Table 2). The results
suggest that material inhomogeneity should be included
in finite element analyses of pultruded beams, and that
variation of the properties in the edges and junctions of
the beams can have a significant effect on the overall
performance of pultruded beams. It remains to be deter-
mined if the property variations chosen in this study are
indeed a true representation of the actual material
property variations
Conclusion
Prediction of the local buckling loads in pultruded fibre
reinforced plastic beams subjected to flexural loading is
influenced by a number of factors arising from the non-
linearity in expermental data and from the anisotropic
and inhomogeneous material properties of the beams.
It has been shown that nonlinear experimental data
obtained from full-scale tests on pultruded beams mustbe correctly interpreted so as not to overestimate the
buckling capacity of these beams. An argument has
been made for estimating buckling loads at the very
onset of nonlinearity in the test data, and not at the
point at which large and visible post-buckling deforma-
tion occurs. It has also been shown that the value of the
edge restraint coefficient for a pultruded beam can be
obtained from a combination of test data and classical
orthotropic plate theory. Parametric studies have been
presented which show that the in-plane shear modulus
has the largest influence on the buckling load. The
importance of utilizing the ‘actual’ material properties
in analytical or numerical studies has also been empha-
sized. It has been demonstrated that material inho-
mogeneity in pultruded beams can be a cause of
discrepancies between experimentally determined buck-
ling loads and those predicted by finite element meth-
ods. The assumption of uniform material properties
throughout the beam may not be appropriate for the
analysis of pultruded beams.
Local buckling of pultruded beams: L.C. Bank et al.
Acknowledgement
Support for this study was provided by the National
Science Foundation under grant number MSM-9015502
(Dr K. Chong, Program Director). The pultruded
beams used in the experimental study were provided by
Creative Pultrusions, Inc.
References
1
2
3
4
5
6
I
8
9
IO
I5
1617
I8
I9
Head, P.R. Design methods and bridge forms for the cost-effective use of advanced composites in bridges. In Advanced
Composi tes in Bridges and Structures, eds. K.W. Neale andP. Labossiere, The Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, 1992,
pp. 15-30
Bank, L.C., Nadipelli, M. and Gentry, T.R. Local buckling andfailure of pultruded fiber-reinforced plastic beams. ASME J. Eng.
Mat er. Techn ol. 1994, 116, 233-231
Bank, L.C., Gentry, T.R. and Nadipelli, M. Local buckling ofpultruded FRP beams - analysis and design. In Proc. 49th
Annu al SPI Conference, Composi tes Instit ute, Society for the
Plast ics Industry , Cincinnat i, OH, February 7-10. 1994,Session8-D, pp. 1-6
Nadipelli, M. Expermental investigation of local buckling andfailure of pultruded fiber reinforced plastic beams. Master ofCivil Engineering Thesis, The Catholic University of America,Washington, DC, 1994Barbero, E.J. and Raftoyiannis, I.G. Local buckling of FRPbeams and columns. AS CE J. Mat er. Civ il Eng. 1993, 5 (3),
339-355
Mottram, J.T. Lateral-torsional buckling of a pultruded I-beam.Com posi tes, 1992, 23 (2) 81-92
Yoon, S.J., Scott, W. and Zureick, A. An experimental investi-gation of the behavior of concentrically loaded pultrudedcolumns. In Adv anced Com posit es in Bridges and Structures, eds.K.W. Neale and P. Labossiere, The Canadian Society for CivilEngineering, 1992, pp. 309-317Mosallam, A.S. Short and long-term behavior of a pultruded
fiber reinforced plastic frame. PhD Thesis, The CatholicUniversity of America, Washington, DC, 1990Mosallam, AS. and Bank, L.C. Short-term behavior of pul-truded fiber-reinforced plastic frame. A SCE J. Struct . Eng. 1992,
118 (7), 1937-1954Lekhnitskii, SC. Anisotropic Plates. Translated from the 2ndRussian Edition (1956) by SW. Tsai and T. Cheron, Gordon andBreach, NY, I968Lee, D.J. The local buckling coefficient for orthotropic structuralsections. Aero J., 1978, 82 (81 l), 313-320Bulson, P.S. The Stability of Flat Plates. Chatto and Windus,London, 1970Shuleshko, P. A reduction method for buckling problems oforthotropic plates. Aero. Q., 1957, 8, 145-156
Brunelle, E.J. and Ayibo, G.A. Generic buckling curves for spe-cially orthotropic rectangular plates. AI AA J., 1983, 21 (8)
1150-1156
Creative Pultrusions Design Guide, Creative Pultrusions, AlumBank, PA, 1988Zureick, A. Personal communication,
Wang, Y. and Zureick, A. Characterization of the longitudinaltensile behavior of pultruded I-shape structural members usingcoupon specimens. Com p. Struct . 1994, 29 (4) 463472
Leissa, A.W. and Martin, A.F. Vibration and buckling of rec-tangular composite plates with variable fiber spacing. Comp.
St ruct. 1990, 14 (4), 339-357
Pandey, M.D. and Sherbourne, A.N. Stability of inhomogeneousfibrous composite plates. Int . .I Sol . Struct., 1993, 30 (I), 37-60
Construction and Building Materials 1995 Volume 9 Number 6 331