Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) SERBIA · 2019. 2. 18. · LSSIP Year 2015 Serbia 2...

Year 2015 - Level 1

EUROCONTROL

Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) SERBIA

LSSIP Year 2015 Serbia Released Issue

DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SHEET

LSSIP for Serbia

Infocentre Reference: 16/01/29-86

Document Identifier Edition: Year 2015

LSSIP Year 2015 Serbia Edition Date: 18 Feb 2016

LSSIP Focal Point - Bojan Savnik E-mail: [email protected] SMATSA - ANSP

LSSIP Focal Point – Nataša Kočović E-mail: [email protected] CAD

LSSIP Contact Person - Octavian Cioara E-mail:

[email protected]

Unit DPS/PEPR

Status Intended for

Working Draft General Public

Draft Agency Stakeholders

Proposed Issue Restricted Audience

Released Issue

Accessible via: Internet (www.eurocontrol.int)

Path: Y:\03 LSSIP\1. LSSIP States\Serbia (RS) - OC\Year_2015\Released\LSSIP Year 2015_RS_Released.docx

LINKS TO REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

1 LSSIP Guidance Material http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/guidance-material

2 ESSIP Plan Edition 2015 http://www.eurocontrol.int/pepr

3 European ATM Portal Working - https://www.eatmportal.eu/working

Public - https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ 4 ESSIP Report 2014 http://www.eurocontrol.int/pepr

5 STATFOR Forecasts http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor

6 Acronyms and abbreviations

http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries

7 LSSIP Documents http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

8 AIP Serbia/Montenegro http://www.smatsa.rs/AIS/Active/eAIP/start_page.html


APPROVAL SHEET

The following authorities have approved all parts of LSSIP Year 2015 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European Single Sky ImPlementation (ESSIP) Plan – Edition 2015.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 1

Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 3

Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment ................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Geographical Scope ................................................................................................................ 4

1.1.1 International Membership ......................................................................................................... 4 1.1.2 Geographical description of the FIR(s) ..................................................................................... 4 1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation ................................................................................. 4

1.2 National Stakeholders .............................................................................................................. 5 1.2.1 Civil Regulator ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.2 SMATSA ................................................................................................................................... 8 1.2.3 Airports ...................................................................................................................................... 9 1.2.4 Military Authorities ..................................................................................................................... 9

Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity ............................................................................................................ 12 2.1 Evolution of traffic in Serbia & Montenegro ........................................................................... 12 2.2 BELGRADE ACC ................................................................................................................... 13

2.2.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2011-2020 ........................................................................ 13 2.2.2 Summer 2015 performance .................................................................................................... 13 2.2.3 Planning Period 2016-2020 – Summer ................................................................................... 13

Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations ........................................................................................ 16

Chapter 4 - National Projects ................................................................................................................. 17

Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination ....................................................................................................... 23 5.1 Regional Cooperation Initiatives ............................................................................................ 23

Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation ....................................................................................... 24 6.1 Conventions ........................................................................................................................... 24 6.2 ESSIP Objectives Implementation progress .......................................................................... 25

ANNEXES

LSSIP Year 2015 Serbia 1 Released Issue

Executive Summary

National ATM Context

Serbia is a European Common Aviation Area (ECAA) Member State.

In the context of this document, there are two main stakeholders in Serbia: Civil Aviation Directorate (CAD) on the regulator side and Serbia and Montenegro Air Traffic Services SMATSA llc (SMATSA) on the provider side.

Serbian National Supervisory Authority (NSA) is embedded in the CAD.

SMATSA is a joint air navigation service provider (ANSP) for two states, Serbia and Montenegro.

Traffic and Capacity

Traffic in Serbia & Montenegro increased by 8.1% during Summer 2015 (May to October), when compared to the same period during 2014. The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast predicts an average annual increase between 1.7% and 5.2% during the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 3.5%.

ESSIP Objective Implementation

There is a generally good level of implementation of the ESSIP Objectives. A substantial part of the technology related objectives are expected to be implemented in 2017/2018. The implementation of the objectives in the field of AIM is slightly slower than expected due to the difficulties to get the involvement of all the concerned stakeholders.

LSSIP 2015 - Serbia * FOC Date

█ Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table)

State-related ESSIP Objectives

<=

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling

*

AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management *

AOM21.1 Implementation of Direct Routing [PCP]

[E] *

AOM21.2 Implement Free Route Airspace [PCP]

[E] *

AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions *

ATC02.5 Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity Warning - level 2

*

ATC02.6 Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe Altitude Warning - level 2

*

ATC02.7 Implement ground based safety nets - Approach Path Monitor - level 2

*

ATC12.1 Implement automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring

*

ATC15 Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations

ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 *

ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer

*

COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS *

COM11 Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM

*

FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services *

FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning *


LSSIP 2015 - Serbia * FOC Date

█ Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table)

FCM04 Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures - phase 1

FCM05 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP [PCP]

[E] *

FCM06 Traffic Complexity Assessment [PCP]

[E] *

INF04 Implement integrated briefing *

INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD) *

ITY-ACID Aircraft identification

ITY-ADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information

*

ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285 *

ITY-AGVCS2 Implement air-ground voice channel spacing requirements below FL195

*

ITY-COTR Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes

*

ITY-FMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) *

ITY-SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability *

NAV03 Implementation of P-RNAV

NAV10 Implement APV procedures *

SAF10 Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements

*

SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions *

Airport-related ESSIP Objectives

<=

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

LYBE-Beograd Airport

AOP04.1 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1

AOP04.2 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2

AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM)

AOP10 Time Based Separation [PCP]

[E] AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan

[PCP] [E] *

AOP12 Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring

[PCP] [E]

ATC07.1 Implement AMAN tools and procedures

ENV01 Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements

*

ENV02 Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports

Understanding the Table

Objective Completed No Plan

Objective Partly Completed Missing Data

Objective Planned Not Applicable (Serbia/Belgrade Airport does not participate in this obj.)

Late

E= Essential – Master Plan Reference PCP = Pilot Common Project

NOTE: The year where the coloured box is placed indicates the ‘Implementation Completion Date’ as stated in the ESSIP for each objective. The colour-code indicates the Local progress with respect to this date.


Introduction

The Local Single Sky ImPlementation documents (LSSIPs), as an integral part of the ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the ESSIP and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. The LSSIP document – Year 2015 describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2015.

The LSSIP documents are structured into 6 chapters to better differentiate the Stakeholder(s) accountable for the information contained in each of them:

Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organizations, the organizational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organization and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided in this chapter.

Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level;

Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the ESSIP Report which are relevant to the state/stakeholders concerned. The state reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations;

Chapter 4 provides a set of the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the ATM MP OIs and/or Enablers and ESSIP related Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the states per each project included in this chapter;

Chapter 5 deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the states concerned;

Chapter 6 contains high-level information on progress and plans of each ESSIP Objective. The information for each ESSIP Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.

Note: Chapter 6 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of ESSIP Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the ESSIP.

Note: The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.


Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment

1.1 Geographical Scope

1.1.1 International Membership

Serbia is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:

Organisation Since

ECAC 2002

EUROCONTROL 2005

European Union

EASA

ICAO 2001

NATO

ITU 2001

1.1.2 Geographical description of the FIR(s)

The geographical scope of this document addresses Beograd FIR/UIR (airspace over Serbia, Montenegro, Montenegro territorial waters and the airspace over the portion of high seas in the Adriatic).

Beograd FIR/UIR is surrounded by FIRs of eight States, namely Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, FYROM, Hungary, Italy and Romania.

The Division Flight Level (DFL) separating upper from lower ATS airspace is FL285.

http://www.smatsa.rs/AIS/Active/eAIP/start_page.html

1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation

The Serbian airspace is generally divided into uncontrolled and controlled portions according to the Government Regulation on the use of Class C (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia” No. 115/2003) valid since Nov 21st 2003 and the Government Regulation on airspace classes in the Republic of Serbia and the conditions for their use (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia” No. 20/11) that entered into force on Dec 1st 2011.

Airspace classes are applied as follows:

- ICAO class C: between 1500 FT (450 M) AGL and FL 660, except in control zones (CTR) and aerodrome traffic zones (ATZ) when active;

- ICAO class D: in all CTRs; and - ICAO class G: from the ground up to 1500 FT (450 M) AGL and ATZ when active, except in

CTRs.

The Serbian airspace is sub-divided into:

a) en-route (FL145 – FL660) for which the responsibility rests upon Beograd ATCC,

b) seven TMAs and CTRs for which the responsibility rests upon the Approach Offices located at the respective airports. The lower limits of all TMAs are 450m (1500ft) above GND while the upper limit is FL145.


The revised version on the Regulation on airspace classes in the Republic of Serbia and the conditions for their use was published in “Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia” No 106/2013 and entered into force on March 6th 2014.

1.2 National Stakeholders

The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Serbia are the following:

- Government of the Republic of Serbia

- Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure

- CAD – Civil Aviation Directorate of the Republic of Serbia (the role of NSA)

- SMATSA – Serbia and Montenegro Air Traffic Services SMATSA llc

Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram:

GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA

GOVERNMENT OF

MONTENEGRO

CAD MANAGING BOARD CAA COUNCIL

Civil Aviation Directorate of the Republic of Serbia

Civil Aviation Agency

SMATSA


1.2.1 Civil Regulator

1.2.1.1 General information

Civil aviation in Serbia falls under the responsibility of the Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The CAD is further detailed in the following sections.

Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible

Legal Basis

Rule-making Government, Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure and CAD

Air Transport Law (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia” No 73/10, Corrigendum No 57/11, 93/12, 45/15 and 66/15), bylaws on transposed EU Regulations

Safety Oversight Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure , CAD (audit and inspection)

Air Transport Law (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia” No 73/10, Corrigendum No 57/11, 93/12, 45/15 and 66/15);

Regulation on requirements, issuing and validity period of the certificate for providing air navigation services (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, No 32/11, No 54/12 and No 24/13) and relevant European regulations transposed

Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements

Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure,

CAD


Regulation on requirements, issuing and validity period of the certificate for providing air navigation services (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, No 32/11, No 54/12 and No 24/13)

Airspace Government, Ministry of Defence, Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure, CAD


Regulation on transposition of EU regulations on airspace management and flexible use of airspace (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, No 69/11)

Economic Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure,

Ministry of Finance

CAD


Accounting Law (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia” No 62/13) which applies International Accounting Standards (IAS) as well as International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), and Auditing Law (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia” No 62/13) which applies International Standards on Auditing (ISA);

Regulation on requirements, issuing and validity period of the certificate for providing air navigation services (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, No 32/11, 54/12 and 24/13);

Law on Ratification of Multilateral Agreement Relating Route Charges (“Official Gazette of the Serbia and Montenegro”–International agreements, No. 4/05); Regulation on calculating and determining charges for air navigation services (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia” No. 98/11 and 71/13) which transposes Commission Regulation (EC) No 1794/2006 and EUROCONTROL Conditions of Application of the Route Charges System and Conditions of Payment;

Decision on air navigation services charges in area of terminal control services (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, No 91/06 and 45/07);


Environment Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning, Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure, CAD

Air Transport Law (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia” No 73/10, Corrigendum No 57/11, 93/12, 45/15 and 66/15)

Security Government, Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure, CAD


National Civil Aviation Security Program (NCASP) of the Republic of Serbia;

Regulation establishing the common rules in the field of civil aviation security (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, No 2/11);

Regulation supplementing common basic standards in civil aviation security;

Regulation on derogation from common basic standards in civil aviation security;

Regulation on Commission inspections in the field of civil aviation security (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, No 19/11);

Decision establishing the national aviation security committee (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, No 20/11);

Regulation on detailed measures for implementation of common basic standards in Aviation security (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, No 78/11);

National Quality Control Programme;

National Civil Aviation Security Training Programme (NCASTP).

Accident investigation The Republic of Serbia accidents and serious incidents investigation centre

Law on accident investigations for aviation, railways and waterborne transport („Оfficial Gazette of the Republic of Serbia“, No 66/15);

Regulation on Investigation of Aircraft Accidents and Serious Incidents (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, No.71/09, 1/10).

1.2.1.2 CAD

The Civil Aviation Directorate of Serbia (CAD) was founded by the Government as a public agency (Article 233 of Air Transport Law (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia” No 73/10, Corrigendum No 57/11, 93/12, 45/15 and 66/15) and entrusted with the tasks of regulation, oversight (audits and inspections), certification, licensing and record keeping in the civil aviation in the RS, as well as cooperating with the international aviation organizations.

The CAD is headed by the Board and Director. CAD Board was appointed in November 2015 by the Government (Article 238 of the Air Transport Law).

CAD is the NSA (National Supervisory Authority) for the area of air navigation compliant with relevant EU provisions, and as such issues certificates and performs continued oversight over ANSPs (Article 234 of the Air Transport Law).

The organisational chart of CAD is depicted in the Annex B of this document.

The CAD of Serbia can be visited at www.cad.gov.rs

Annual Report published: Y http://www.cad.gov.rs/docs/informator_dcv.pdf ANSP’s Safety Oversight Annual Report for 2015 is under preparation.


1.2.2 SMATSA

1.2.2.1 Services provided

Name of the ANSP: SMATSA – Serbia and Montenegro Air Traffic Services SMATSA llc

Governance: Two State Enterprise Ownership: Gov. of Serbia=92%; Gov. of Montenegro=8%

Services provided Y/N Comment

ATC en-route Y

ATC approach Y

ATC Airport(s) Y

AIS Y

CNS Y

MET Y

ATCO training Y

Others Y Flight Check and Calibration Service for NAVAIDs / COM / PANS-OPS

Additional information:

Provision of services in other State(s):

Y Bosnia and Herzegovina, within the eastern portion of the upper airspace (FL325 – FL660) of Sarajevo FIR Montenegro (within the entire controlled airspace)

SMATSA web address: www.smatsa.rs

Annual Report published: Y http://www.smatsa.rs/Eng/ShowContent.aspx?mi=59

The organisational chart of SMATSA is depicted in the Annex B to this document.

1.2.2.2 ATC systems in use

FDPS

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Thales

Upgrade1 of the ATC system is performed or planned? major upgrade completed in 2011

Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? 2019

ATC Unit Beograd ATCC, Beograd TWR, Podgorica APP

SDPS

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Thales

Upgrade1 of the ATC system is performed or planned? major upgrade completed in 2011

Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? 2019

ATC Unit Beograd ATCC, Beograd TWR, Podgorica APP

1 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40))


1.2.2.3 ATC units

The ATC units in the Serbian airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP, are the following:

ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks

En-route TMA

Beograd ATCC 14 - Beograd FIR/UIR; Sarajevo FIR

Eastern part of Sarajevo FIR FL325 – FL660

Beograd ATCC NA 2 Beograd TMA

Niš APP/TWR NA 1 Nis TMA

1.2.3 Airports

1.2.3.1 General information

Three international airports in Serbia, namely LYBE (BEG) Beograd “Nikola Tesla”, LYNI (INI) Niš “Konstantin Veliki” and LYPR (PRN) Priština are organised as State Enterprises, owned by the Government of Serbia. The Priština Airport is temporarily operated by UNMIK (United Nations Mission In Kosovo).

Two airports, LYBT (BJY) Batajnica and LYKV (KVO) Kraljevo are operated by the military, owned by the State and are available for the civilian air traffic.

1.2.3.2 Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP

Referring to the List of Airports in the ESSIP Plan – Part I Section 4, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives.

Therefore, Beograd “Nikola Tesla” Airport (LYBE) is the only Serbian airport covered by the LSSIP Year 2015.

1.2.4 Military Authorities

The Military Aviation Authority in Serbia is represented by Serbian Air Force and Air Defence.

The main role of the Military Aviation Authority in ANS provision is in the domain of ATM by contributing in ASM planning processes and in co-ordinating, organising and controlling special activities in TSAs.

The MAA does not have any particular role in the provision of ATS.

The Military Aviation Authority is the main source of the information and data promulgated in the Military Aeronautical Information Package, which is published by SMATSA.

The MAA is also responsible for military aircraft registry, certification of military aircraft and equipment.

Military authorities are taking part in the incident/accident investigations when military aircraft are involved.

The MAA reports to the Serbian Ministry of Defence.

1.2.4.1 Regulatory role

Regulatory framework and rule-making

OAT GAT

OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions?

Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions?

N/A

Level of such legal provision: Ministerial Decree, and Air Force Regulation.

Level of such legal provision: NA

Authority signing such legal provision: Minister of Defence, Chief of Air Force.

Authority signing such legal provision: N/A

These provisions cover: These provisions cover:

Rules of the Air for OAT Y


Oversight

1.2.4.2 Service Provision role

OAT GAT

Services Provided: Services Provided: N/A

En-Route N SMATSA is providing service En-Route

Approach/TMA N SMATSA is providing service Approach/TMA

Airfield/TWR/GND N SMATSA is providing service Airfield/TWR/GND

AIS N SMATSA is providing service AIS

MET N SMATSA is providing service MET

SAR Y SAR

TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS

Other: Other:

Additional Information: Additional Information:

Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified?

N/A If YES, since: Duration of the Certificate:

Certificate issued by: If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations?

Additional Information:

Organisation of military ATS for OAT N Organisation of military ATS for GAT N/A

OAT/GAT Coordination N OAT/GAT Coordination N/A

ATCO Training N ATCO Training N/A

ATCO Licensing N ATCO Licensing N/A

ANSP Certification N ANSP Certification N/A

ANSP Supervision N ANSP Supervision N/A

Aircrew Training Y

Aircrew Licensing Y

Additional Information: Legal provisions do not cover ATM/ANSP related matters.

Additional Information:

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

National AIP Y National AIP N/A

National Military AIP Y National Military AIP N/A

EUROCONTROL eAIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP N/A

Other: Other: -

OAT GAT

National oversight body for OAT: MoD NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: N/A

Additional information: Additional information:


1.2.4.3 User role

IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly?

OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y

If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options:

Free Routing N Within specific corridors only Y

Within the regular (GAT) national route network N Under radar control N

Within a special OAT route system Y Under radar advisory service N

If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements:

No special arrangements √ Exemption from Route Charges

Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Provision of ATC in UHF

CNS exemptions: RVSM 8.33 Mode S ACAS

Others:

1.2.4.4 Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)

Military in Serbia applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y

FUA Level 1 implemented: Y




A = ActualF = Forecast

Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity

2.1 Evolution of traffic in Serbia & Montenegro

2015

Traffic in Serbia & Montenegro increased by 8.1% during Summer 2015 (May to October), when compared to the same period during 2014.

2016-2020

The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast predicts an average annual increase between 1.7% and 5.2% during the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 3.5%.

0

100.000

200.000

300.000

400.000

500.000

600.000

700.000

800.000

900.000

2011 A 2012 A 2013 A 2014 A 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F

IFR

flig

hts

Serbia&Montenegro - Annual IFR Movements

IFR movements - Actuals

IFR movements - Baseline forecast

IFR movements - High forecast

IFR movements - Low forecast

A = ActualF = Forecast

2012 A 2013 A 2014 A 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F

H 12.8% 7.3% 4.9% 4.5% 4.2% 4.8% 4.0%

B -4.1% -3.1% 6.9% 12.4% 5.2% 2.7% 3.2% 3.0% 3.3% 2.5%

L 11.8% 2.8% 0.5% 1.7% 1.7% 1.8% 1.1%

ESRA08 B -2.4% -1.1% 1.7% 1.6% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 2.2% 2.7% 1.8%

EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2015)IFR flights yearly growth

Serbia&Montenegro


2.2 BELGRADE ACC

2.2.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2011-2020

2.2.2 Summer 2015 performance

Traffic Evolution 2015 Capacity Baseline En-route Delay (min/flight) - Summer Capacity

gap Ref value Actual

+ 7.8 % 181 (+10%) 0.15 0.04 No

En-route delay slightly increased to 0.04 minutes per flight in Summer 2015.

Capacity Plan +1% Achieved Comments

Night Free Route. Night Cross border FRA with Croatia. Yes

LARA/CIMACT No Public procurement procedure issues

Lower sector DFL change Yes

CCAMS Yes

Maximum configuration: 12 sectors Yes 9 sectors were opened and sufficient to cope with the traffic demand

Summer 2015 performance assessment

The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 181. The peak 1 hour demand was 159 and the peak 3 hour demand was 146 during the measurement period.

2.2.3 Planning Period 2016-2020 – Summer

The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Peak Day Traffic 2464 2435 2441 2610 2943

Summer Traffic 1870 1803 1792 1930 2080

Yearly Traffic 1502 1435 1393 1491 1614

Summer Traffic Forecast 2129 2193 2265 2331 2411

High Traffic Forecast - Summer 2176 2286 2389 2484 2605

Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 2078 2082 2113 2155 2190

Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.04

Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.05 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.03

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Enr

ou

te D

ela

y (m

inu

tes

per

fligh

t)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rag

e)

LYBAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

*From 01/01/2015 to 31/10/2015

2016 2017 2018 20190.10 0.10 0.10 0.100.14 0.14 0.14 0.14

LYBACTAAnnual

Summer

En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference Values


Capacity Plan

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Free Route Airspace

H24 Free Route Airspace

(AoR). H24 Cross border FRA with Croatia. Night Cross Border FRA with other adjacent states.

H24 Cross Border FRA with other adjacent states.

Airspace Management Advanced FUA

CIMACT LARA

Airport & TMA Network Integration

Cooperative Traffic Management

Airspace ATCC

sectorisation change

Procedures Staffing

Technical

DPS Software improvement

DPS Hardware upgrade

Data Link

Improved VHF/UHF.

Improved OLDI Controller

support tools. Improved

MTCD New Radar

Station

Enhanced Mode S

Improved MTCD VoIP

Capacity

Max sectors 14 14 14 14 14

Capacity increase p.a. 2% 1% 1% 1% 1%

Reference profile 0% 0% 0% 0% N/A

Profile – Current routes 1% 1% 1% 2% N/A

Additional information

H 181 0% 182 1% 182 0% 182 0%

Ref. 181 0% 181 0% 181 0% 181 0%

L 181 0% 181 0% 181 0% 181 0%

Open 181 0% 181 0% 181 0% 181 0%

C/R 182 1% 183 1% 184 1% 187 2%

2019

Capacity ProfilesProfiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year)

LYBA 181

ACC2015

baseline 2016 2017 2018


2016-2020 Planning Period Outlook

No capacity issues are expected in Belgrade ACC for the next planning period.

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

2016‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 181 181 181 181

Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 181 181 181 181

Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 182 183 184 187

Capacity Profile ‐ High 181 182 182 182

Capacity Profile ‐ Low 181 181 181 181

Capacity Baseline 165 181

2016 ‐ 2020 Plan 185 187 189 191 193

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200Cap

acity profile (movements per hour)

LYBACTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios


Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations

Recommendations issued from the ESSIP Report for 2014 applicable to Serbia for all items that require corrective actions and improvements.

Reference

number Recommendation 2014 Ownership

REC-2014-2

Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of FCM01, AOP04.1, SAF10, INF04, NAV03, AOP03, ENV01, ITY-AGDL, ITY-ADQ, COM09, COM10, ITY-FMTP and ITY-COTR, to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.

Local Stakeholders

Corrective actions taken:

Yes

Description:

SAF10 - The implementation of FIS is postponed to 2018.

INF04 - The integration of AIS briefing and FPL was implemented in April 2013 through the installation of EAD Briefing Facility.

AOP03 - ANSP has completed all SLOAs.

ENV01 - expected for implementation in 2016

COM10 - Completed all SLOAs except Extended ATSMHS functionalities which is expected in 2016.

ITY-ADQ - Expected to be implemented by 12/2017

ITY-AGDL - Expected to be implemented by 12/2018, pending the clarification of the technical solution.


Chapter 4 - National Projects

The major national ATM modernisation undertakings fall within the two categories:

a) ANS provision and

b) Legislative reforms.

a) The modernisation of ANS provision, referred to as FAMUS project, started in 2002 with the approval of the Modernization Master Plan by the Federal Government. Project included the construction of a new ACC building as well as the supply and installation of a new ATM system and other equipment. The first phase of the FAMUS project was finalized in May 2011. The second phase will have finished by July2015.

b) The legislative reform includes the enactment of the Аir Transport Law („Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia“, No 73/10, 57/11, 93/12, 45/15 and 66/15); together with passing new regulations in line with the SES requirements. CAD incorporated the following regulations into the national system during 2015:

Regulation on air traffic controller`s licences, training organisations and aero-medical centres ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia", No 83/15); Regulation on unmanned aircraft ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia", No 108/15); Regulation laying down requirements on aircraft identification for surveillance for the Single European sky ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia", No

108/15); Regulation laying down requirements for the coordinated allocation and use of Mode S interrogator codes for the Single European Sky ("Official Gazette of the

Republic of Serbia", No 96/15); In collaboration with the ISIS II programme, CAD is developing an Action Plan for the transposition of the SES II legislative package.

The main projects currently ongoing in Serbia are depicted in the table below.

Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references

Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas *

SMATSA (RS) Air-Ground radio network enhancement

Implementation of contingency sites for Rudnik and Kopaonik radio sites, including land acquisition, facilities design and building, and equipment procurement.

2016-2018 Ongoing ESSIP:COM11 OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: - Safety: Improved through better R/T coverage and higher availability Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -




AMHS Upgrade AIDA-NG system for new AMHS functionality: - AMC table import function - Export statistics in AMC format

By the end of 2016.

Ongoing ESSIP:COM10 OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: - Safety: Within the Extended ATSMHS, AMHS security services, when implemented, may help to protect against safety hazards such as accidental or deliberate message corruption and can provide protection against undetected misdeliverys. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

Beograd ATCC Air-Ground radio system upgrade

Installation and Upgrade of IP ready VHF/UHF radios at Belgrade, Kopaonik, Rudnik and Podgorica locations.

By December 2015

Completed ESSIP:COM11 OI-Steps: - Other: SESAR Enabler CTE-C5

Capacity: Improved through more frequency channels. Safety: Improved through better R/T coverage and higher availability. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

Beograd TWR New tower building, together with the Beograd ATCC building annex, is needed because of limitations of the existing building and related infrastructure, which was built more than 50 years ago.

2016 -2020 Ongoing ESSIP:- OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: - Safety: Improved situation awareness. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

CCAMS Centralised SSR Code Assignment and Management System (CCAMS).

By March 2015.

Completed ESSIP:- OI-Steps: - Other: SESAR Enabler GSURV-0101

Capacity: Efficient management of SSR codes. Safety: Reduction of SSR code conflicts and code change. Retenation of assigned SSR code within the the CCAMS area. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Flexibility to match future demands.

CIMACT Civil Military ATM co-ordination tool - integration of civil and military air information

Planned to be completed by the end of 2016.

Ongoing ESSIP:AOM19 OI-Steps: AOM-0201, AOM-0202, AOM-0205, AOM-0401, DCB-0203 Other: -

Capacity: Increased through better utilisation of airspace resources Safety: Increased through better coordination between civil and military airspace needs Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -




CPDLC Controller Pilot Data Link Communications (CPDLC)

By the end of 2018.

Ongoing ESSIP:COM09, ITY-AGDL, ITY-COTR, ITY-FMTP OI-Steps: AUO-0301, CM-0201 Other: -

Capacity: Increased capacity through reduction of the controller workload and better usage of the available resources. Safety: CPDLC offers the potential to relieve some congestion, enhancing existing communications between the air and the ground, and offering unambiguous transmission of routine messages between controllers and pilots. In addition, shortcomings such as stuck microphones, blocking of frequencies or simultaneous transmissions are avoided, contributing to the overall safety of the ATC system. CPDLC reduces the pilot's and the air traffic controller's communication workload, allows them to concentrate on other essential tasks, and reduces of code conflicts and SSR code change. Increased safety through automation. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Increased controller productivity through the use of advanced tools.

DVORs and ILS/DME NAV aids

Replacement of VORs with DVORs, ILS replacement with ILS/DMEs and new ILS/DMEs

2016- 2019 Ongoing ESSIP:- OI-Steps: - Other: SESAR Enabler CTE-N5a

Capacity: - Safety: Improved through better availability and reliability of the NAV infrastructure. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Reduced operations and maintenance costs.

DVOR and DME NAV aids

DVOR and DME for Beograd and Vršac airports.

By August 2016.

Ongoing ESSIP:- OI-Steps: - Other: SESAR Enabler CTE-N5a





Enhanced Mode-S

Upgrade TopSky-ATC system for enhanced Mode-S functionality.

By the end of 2017

Planned ESSIP:ITY-ACID, ITY-SPI OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: Increased capacity through reduction of the controller workload and better usage of the available resources. Safety: Increased safety through automation. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Increased controller productivity through the use of advanced tools.

Implementation of Voice and Data transfer over Internet Protocol (IP) in ATM

Technical personnel training in EUROCAE ED-137 & ED-138 standards. Transport network migration from TDM to IP. Belgrade ATCC VoIP Voice Communication System implementation in accordance with EUROCAE ED-137.

2015-2020 Ongoing ESSIP:COM11 OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: Allows more flexible dynamic sectorisation and allocation of resources Safety: - Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Reduced costs through the use of standard hardware and of Internet off the shelf technologies

New radar station

New radar station building, along with the procurement of a new secondary radar system to be installed at the station.

2015-2018 Ongoing ESSIP:- OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: Improved SSR coverage redundancy on lower altitudes in south-eastern parts of Serbian en-route airspace will lead to more optimal radar vectoring in those areas. Safety: Improved SSR coverage redundancy in a south-eastern parts of Serbian en-route airspace and better air traffic situation awareness for inbound flights originating from neighbouring countries’ airports (Sofia, Skopje). Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

Fall-back ATM System

Operational Backup System to the SMATSA llc for providing a reduced set of ATMS functions and will consist of: - operational (ONL) and - test (TST) configuration.

First phase by June 2016 Second Phase by Decembre 2016.

Ongoing ESSIP:- OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: - Safety: Improved through availability of providing ATS service after Main ONL System becomes failed. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -




NDB renewal Renew all NDBs 2018-2021 Planned ESSIP:- OI-Steps: - Other: -


PENS PENS (Pan-European Network Service) ANSP backbone service implementation.

By the end of 2016

Ongoing ESSIP:COM09, COM10, ITY-FMTP OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: - Safety: - Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: More cost effective than fragmented network services, meet current and future communication needs.

Secondary radar

Radar system upgrade at Srpska Gora (primary radar site) through installation of a collocated secondary radar.

By April 2015

Completed ESSIP:ITY-ACID, ITY-SPI OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: Use of radar vectoring in TMA Podgorica becomes possible. Along with reduction of the controller workload, it leads to more efficient usage of terminal airspace. Safety: Improved through availability of SSR information in TMA Podgorica and increased SSR coverage redundancy in a certain part of en-route airspace. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

Surveillance data real time analysis system

System for surveillance data continuous recording, real time analysis, data conversion, replay and display (permanent installation at Belgrade ATCC and portable on-site configuration).

By August 2015

Completed ESSIP:ITY-SPI OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: - Safety: improved through increased confidence in the quality of surveillance information Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -




SWIM Implementation of the System Wide Information Management.

2020 - Tentative plan ESSIP:COM11, INF04, INF07, ITY-ADQ OI-Steps: IS-0201, IS-0202, IS-0204, IS-0901-A Other: -

Capacity: - Safety: All stakeholders will share access to the information they need, including more reliable information about the future state of the ATM system and its environment. Greater automation of ATM will allow air traffic controllers to focus more on monitoring and contingency planning and this will also reduce data entry errors. Environment: Increased predictability of air traffic movements and infrastructure usage at the airport will lead to optimized usage of resources which will have a positive impact on the environment. Cost-Efficiency: As the SWIM concept grows in maturity, standardization and re-use of services between systems as well as the reduced duplication in managing the same information in multiple systems will bring down system operating costs for all ATM stakeholders.

Terminal/en-route radar

Implementation of terminal radar for Beograd and Batajnica terminal areas and enhancement of SSR coverage redundancy in en-route airspace.

2016-2018 Tentative plan ESSIP:- OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: Improved air traffic situation awareness in TMA airspace and more efficient usage of terminal airspace due to possible reduction of horizontal separation between aircrafts. Safety: Improved coverage redundancy in Beograd and Batajnica terminal manoeuvring areas. Significant improvement of SSR radar coverage in en-route airspace. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

VDF renewal Renew all airport VDFs. 2017 - 2019 Planned ESSIP:- OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: - Safety: Improved situation awareness. Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Reduced operations and maintenance costs.

LSSIP Year 2015 Serbia 23 Draft

Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination

5.1 Regional Cooperation Initiatives

ECAA (European Common Aviation Area) is a project initiated and managed by the European Commission, aiming at the establishment of equal conditions of competition and common rules in aviation, including ATM and environment. As for ATM, the project will seek the highest degree of cooperation with the view to extending SES among the States concerned (ECAA Agreement was signed between the European Community and its Member States, the Republic of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Republic of Croatia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, the Republic of Iceland, the Republic of Montenegro, the Kingdom of Norway, Romania, the Republic of Serbia and the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (pursuant to UN Security Council Resolution 1244 of June 10th 1999) on the Establishment of a European Common Aviation Area).

Serbia has accepted to align its national aviation legislation to the complete aviation acquis of the Community. To this end, Serbia signed the ECAA Agreement in May 2006 which was ratified in May 2009 (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia – International Treaties” No 38/09).

Serbia completed the transposition of the SES I legislative package contained in Annex IB to the ECAA Agreement.

Along the lines of SES, concrete and effective actions forward fulfilling operational requirements resulted in signing the agreements on operational-technical cooperation between SMATSA and other ANSPs in the region.

Agreements will consecutively contribute to airspace usage, increased capacity and ensure safe and efficient flow of air traffic with minimum delays.

Application of the agreements will bring many benefits and improvements in ANS provision, especially in the areas of safety, flight efficiency, predictability, environment, cost effectiveness and interoperability.

On 27 June 2013, Integra signed a three-year framework contract with the European Commission (DG MOVE) on the ISIS II Programme. The Republic of Serbia is the Beneficiary of the ISIS II Programme (Implementation of the Single European Sky in the South East Europe). Objectives of the ISIS II Programme are the continuation of the ISIS I technical assistance by upgrading the technical support beyond the ECAA Agreement and the preparation of the Beneficiaries for the challenges of implementing the SES II acquis.

The work will be conducted as a continuation and reinforcement of the efforts undertaken under ISIS Programme 2010-2012 in order to build up on the progress already made.

The technical assistance under ISIS II is based on the Performance Scheme Pillar.

CAD, Montenegrin CAA and SMATSA have jointly set up a Performance Roadmap in cooperation with ISIS II, containing plan and steps towards implementing performance regulations by the end of the Reference Period 3.


Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation

6.1 Conventions

Two colour codes are used for each ESSIP Objective ‘box’:

o a colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and

o another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder.

Obj. ID (*) Obj. Title (By mm/yyyy of overall objective, inc non-State SloAs) Obj. Progress (**)

State’s high level progress statement State Impl. Date

REG (By:mm-yyyy) REG high level progress statement

APO. Progress (**)

APO Impl. Date ASP (By:mm-yyyy) ASP high level progress statement

ASP. Progress (**)

ASP Impl. Date MIL (By:mm-yyyy) MIL high level progress statement

MIL. Progress (**)

MIL Impl. Date APO (By:mm-yyyy) APO high level progress statement

APO. Progress (**)

APO Impl. Date

(*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code:

ECAC Completed No Plan

EU+ Partly Completed Not Applicable

Multi-N Planned Missing Data

APT Late


6.2 ESSIP Objectives Implementation progress

AOM13.1

Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling

Timescales:

Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

No Plan

‐

A harmonised OAT and GAT handling is provided by the application of the national principles, rules and procedures. Regulation on transposition of EU regulations on air space management and flexible use of airspace ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia" No 69/11) transposing Regulations (EC) 551/2004 and 2150/2005 was promulgated in April 2011. Further harmonization of OAT/GAT handling is to be coordinated with the relevant military authorities. Implementation of EUROAT has not been decided yet therefore the objective is still "No Plan".

‐

REG (By:12/2018)

CAD

Regulation on transposition of EU regulations on air space management and flexible use of airspace ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia" No 69/11) transposing Regulations (EC) 551/2004 and 2150/2005 was promulgated in April 2011. Further harmonization of OAT/GAT handling is to be coordinated with the relevant military authorities.

‐

No Plan

‐

Military Authority

Regulation on transposition of EU regulations on air space management and flexible use of airspace ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia" No 69/11) transposing Regulations (EC) 551/2004 and 2150/2005 was promulgated in April 2011. Further harmonization of OAT/GAT handling is to be coordinated with the relevant military authorities.

‐

No Plan

‐

ASP (By:12/2018)

Military Authority

‐ ‐ No Plan

‐

SMATSA Under study. No SLOAs will be shown in this edition. ‐ No Plan

‐

MIL (By:12/2018)

Military Authority

Under study. No SLOAs will be shown in this edition. ‐ No Plan

‐

AOM19

Implement Advanced Airspace Management

Timescales:


Planned

‐

Implementation of the Advanced Airspace Management is planned to be finished by 2016. 31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2016)

Military Authority

For the military, under study. No SLoAs will be shown in this edition. ‐ No Plan

31/12/2016

SMATSA Implementation of the Advanced Airspace Management is planned to be finished by 2016.

CIMACT Planned

31/12/2016


AOM21.1

Implementation of Direct Routing

Timescales:

Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017

[PCP]

[Essential] Not Applicable

‐

SMATSA plan to implement FRA by the end of 2017. ‐

ASP (By:12/2017)

SMATSA ‐ ‐ Not Applicable

‐

AOM21.2

Implement Free Route Airspace

Timescales:


[PCP]

[Essential]

Partly Completed

‐

FRA night was implemented in April 2015. Expect to implement full FRA by 2017. 31/12/2017

ASP (By:12/2021)

SMATSA Implemented FRA night in April 2015. ‐

Partly Completed

31/12/2017

AOP03

Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions

Timescales:


Late

‐

Runway Safety Team established for Belgrade Airport. Active members of the team are Belgrade Airport, SMATSA and Air Serbia. CAD has a role as an observer along with conducting regular safety oversight. Framework RST Agreement signed in 2015.

31/05/2016

REG (By:12/2013)

CAD CAD has a role as an observer in the Runway Safety Team along with conducting regular safety oversight. Framework RST Agreement signed in 2015.

‐ Completed

31/05/2015

ASP (By:12/2013)

SMATSA

The implementation of all measures for the prevention of runway incursions is planned by the Airport Operators and ANS Provider. The measures implementation will be preceded by a framework Agreement to be concluded between Airport Operators and SMATSA.

‐

Late

31/05/2016

APO (By:12/2013)

Belgrade Airport

Participating in the Runway Safety Team. Framework RST Agreement signed in 2015.

‐ Late

31/05/2016


AOP04.1

Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level1

Timescales:

‐ not applicable ‐

Not Applicable

LYBE ‐ Beograd Airport

(Outside Applicability Area)

Belgrade Airport is outside the applicability area. There is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document.

‐

REG (By:12/2010)

CAD Belgrade Airport is outside the applicability area. There is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document.

‐ Not Applicable

‐

ASP (By:12/2011)

SMATSA Belgrade Airport is outside the applicability area. There is no operational justification for the implementation of this objective for the time span of this document.

‐ Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2010)

Belgrade Airport


‐ Not Applicable

‐

AOP04.2

Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level 2

Timescales:


Not Applicable




‐

ASP (By:12/2017)


‐ Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2017)

Belgrade Airport


‐ Not Applicable

‐

AOP05

Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM)

Timescales:


Not Applicable




‐

ASP (By:12/2016)


‐ Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2016)

Belgrade Airport


‐ Not Applicable

‐


AOP10

Time Based Separation

Timescales:


[PCP]




Belgrade Airport is not with the applicability area of the objective and there is no operational need for implementation.

‐

REG (By:12/2023)

ASP (By:12/2023)

AOP11

Initial Airport Operations Plan

Timescales:

Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021

[PCP]

[Essential] No Plan


Under study. No SLOAs will be shown in this edition. ‐

ASP (By:12/2021)

SMATSA ‐ ‐ No Plan

‐

APO (By:12/2021)

Belgrade Airport

‐ ‐ No Plan

‐

AOP12

Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring

Timescales:


[PCP]




‐ ‐

ASP (By:12/2020)

APO (By:12/2020)

ATC02.5

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Area Proximity Warning ‐ level 2

Timescales:


Completed

‐

The implementation of APW was done under the FAMUS Project. 31/01/2014

ASP (By:12/2016)

SMATSA The implementation of APW was done under the FAMUS Project. ‐ Completed

31/01/2014


ATC02.6

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Minimum Safe Altitude Warning ‐ level 2

Timescales:


Completed

‐

The implementation of Ground based safety nets ‐ Minimum Safe Altitude Warning ‐ level 2 was done under the FAMUS Project.

31/01/2014

ASP (By:12/2016)

SMATSA The implementation of Ground based safety nets ‐ Minimum Safe Altitude Warning ‐ level 2 was done under the FAMUS Project.

‐ Completed

31/01/2014

ATC02.7

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Approach Path Monitor ‐ level 2

Timescales:


Late

‐

Planned for implementation within a new system. 31/12/2020

ASP (By:12/2016)

SMATSA Implementation is planned for Beograd and Podgorica airports. ‐ Late

31/12/2020

ATC07.1

Implement AMAN tools and procedures

Timescales:


Not Applicable



There is no operational justification to implement the tool, at present. ‐

ASP (By:12/2015)

SMATSA There is no operational justification to implement the tool, at present. ‐ Not Applicable

‐

ATC12.1

Implement automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring

Timescales:


Completed

‐

Implemented in 2011. 16/05/2011

ASP (By:12/2021)

SMATSA ‐ ‐ Completed

16/05/2011


ATC15

Implement, in En‐Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations


Timescales:


Not Applicable

‐

There is no operational justification to implement this tool. ‐

ASP (By:12/2017)

SMATSA There is no operational justification to implement this tool. ‐ Not Applicable

‐

ATC16

Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1

Timescales:


Completed

‐

CAD supervises compliance with regulatory provisions, provides airworthiness certification and delivers operational approval for ACAS II version 7.1. equipped aircraft.

31/03/2012

REG (By:12/2015)

CAD CAD's Flight Ops and Airworthiness Departments supervise compliance with regulatory provisions, provide airworthiness certification and deliver operational approval for ACAS II version 7.1. equipped aircraft.

‐ Completed

30/04/2011

ASP (By:03/2012)

SMATSA Training completed in March 2012. ‐ Completed

31/03/2012

MIL (By:12/2015)

Military Authority

No Military State aircraft put into service ‐ Not Applicable

‐

ATC17

Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer

Timescales:


Planned

‐

Service provider is planning to implement this objective by 2018. NSA will conduct oversight of changes accordingly.

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2018)

SMATSA SMATSA is planning to implement this objective. ‐ Planned

31/12/2018


COM10

Migrate from AFTN to AMHS

Timescales:


Late

‐

Since the new AFTN/AMHS system is implemented by FAMUS project, migration from AFTN to AMHS will be done after successful tests performed with adjacent COM centres.

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2014)

SMATSA Since the new AFTN/AMHS system is implemented by FAMUS project, migration from AFTN to AMHS will be done after successful tests performed with adjacent COM centres.

AMHS / PENS Late

31/12/2016

COM11

Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM

Timescales:


Planned

‐

SMATSA is planning to implement Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM. NSA will review the proposed changes following the established process and procedures, when the changes are submitted by the ANSP.

31/12/2020

ASP (By:12/2020)

SMATSA SMATSA is planning to implement Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM.

Air‐Ground radio network enhancement / Beograd ATCC Air‐Ground radio system upgrade / Implementation of Voice and Data transfer over Internet Protocol (IP) in ATM / SWIM

Planned

31/12/2020

ENV01

Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements

Timescales:


Late


Implementation of CDA techniques is planned for the end of 2016. 31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2013)

SMATSA Implementation of CDA techniques is planned for the end of 2016. ‐ Late

31/12/2016

APO (By:12/2013)

Belgrade Airport

Planned for the middle of 2015. ‐ Late

31/12/2016


ENV02

Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports

Timescales:


Not Applicable



Serbia falls outside the applicability area, under review. ‐

ASP (By:12/2016)

SMATSA Serbia falls outside the applicability area ‐ Not Applicable

‐

APO (By:12/2016)

Belgrade Airport

Serbia falls outside the applicability area ‐ Not Applicable

‐

FCM01

Implement enhanced tactical flow management services

Timescales:


Completed

‐

No direct benefit for ANSP, but the objective has been implemented through FAMUS project. 31/03/2013

ASP (By:07/2014)

SMATSA No direct benefit for ANSP, but the objective has been implemented through FAMUS project.

‐ Completed

31/03/2013

FCM03

Implement collaborative flight planning

Timescales:


Completed

‐

The objective completed within the framework of the FAMUS project. 31/05/2011

ASP (By:12/2017)

SMATSA The objective completed within the framework of the FAMUS project. ‐ Completed

31/05/2011

FCM04

Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures ‐ phase 1


Timescales:


Not Applicable

‐

Serbia is not in the area of applicability of the objective. ‐

ASP (By:12/2015)

SMATSA Serbia is not in the area of applicability of the objective. ‐ Not Applicable

‐


FCM05

Implementation of interactive rolling NOP

Timescales:


[PCP]

[Essential] Planned

‐

Automated ASM support is planned to be integrated into the NM system by the end of 2016. 31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2017)

SMATSA ‐ ‐ Planned

31/12/2016

Military Authority

Automated ASM support is planned to be integrated into the NM system by the end of 2016.

‐ Planned

31/12/2016

APO (By:12/2021)

Belgrade Airport

Under study. No SLOAs will be shown in this edition. ‐ No Plan

‐

FCM06

Traffic Complexity Assessment

Timescales:


[PCP]

[Essential] No Plan

‐

Under study. No SLOAs will be shown in this edition. ‐

ASP (By:12/2021)

SMATSA Under study. No SLOAs will be shown in this edition. ‐ No Plan

‐

INF04

Implement integrated briefing

Timescales:


Late

‐

The integration of AIS briefing and FPL was implemented in April 2013 through the installation of EAD Briefing Facility. Integration of MET is planned to be completed by the end of 2018.

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2012)

SMATSA Integrated briefing function is expected to be implemented by the end of 2018.

SWIM Late

31/12/2018


INF07

Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD)

Timescales:


No Plan

‐

This objective is under study. SMATSA will make plans related to eTOD when the national policies are created by the state.

‐

REG (By:05/2018)

CAD Preparatory actions for establishing eTOD started in 2009. However no plan has been set up so far as it requires the involvement of several State Agencies.

‐ No Plan

‐

ASP (By:05/2018)

SMATSA No SLOAs will be shown in this edition. SMATSA will make plans related to eTOD when the national policies are created by the state.

SWIM No Plan

‐

APO (By:05/2018)

Belgrade Airport

No SLOAs will be shown in this edition. ‐ No Plan

‐

ITY‐ACID

Aircraft identification

Timescales:

Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 System capability: 02/01/2020 Possible deferred compliance, only for services provided by military units or under military supervision, subject to conditions:: 02/01/2025

Planned

‐

Full implementation of Enhanced Mode S is planned. Currently, all SMATSA secondary radars are operating as Enhanced Mode S radar stations and activities on testing Mode S operation have been conducted. Accordingly, SMATSA is planning to upgrade TopSky‐ATC system for Enhanced Mode S functionality and perform necessary testing activities so that such transition could be finalized by the end of 2017.

31/12/2017

ASP (By:01/2020)

SMATSA SMATSA has started conducting activities on radar systems testing in order to be able to implement Mode S in its whole area of responsibility. Mixed Mode operation is applied on two secondary radars.

Enhanced Mode‐S / Secondary radar

Planned

31/12/2017


ITY‐ADQ

Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information

Timescales:

Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017

Late

‐

CAD is developing a working draft of Regulation (EU) 73/2010. AIS SMATSA actively participated in the draft preparation process.

31/07/2017

REG (By:06/2017)

CAD

CAD has developed a draft act for transposition of the Regulation (EU) 73/2010. AIS SMATSA actively participated in the draft preparation process. Detailed timescale for the implementation of the requirements of this Regulation is to be established.

‐

Late

31/07/2017

ASP (By:06/2017)

SMATSA SMATSA develops detailed implementation plan to meet requirements of ADQ regulation that has been adopted in Montenegro, as national rule on aeronautical information services.

SWIM Late

31/12/2017

APO (By:06/2017)

Belgrade Airport

Belgrade Airport is waiting for the transposition of the Regulation. ‐ Late

31/07/2017

ITY‐AGDL

Initial ATC air‐ground data link services above FL‐285

Timescales:

ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020

Late

‐

Regulation (EC) 552/2004 transposed into national system. The objective will be met by 12/2018. 31/12/2018

REG (By:02/2018)

CAD The objective will be met by 12/2018. ‐ Late

31/12/2018

ASP (By:02/2018)

SMATSA The objective will be met by 12/2018. CPDLC Late

31/12/2018

MIL (By:01/2019)

Military Authority

Equipage of State aircraft will not be economically nor operationally justified.

‐ Not Applicable

‐


ITY‐AGVCS2

Implement 8,33 kHz air‐ground voice channel spacing below FL195

Timescales:

Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020

Planned

‐

Regulation (EU) No 1079/2012 will be transposed after 2014. VCS systems upgraded to support 8.33 kHz spacing.

31/12/2018

REG (By:12/2018)

CAD Regulation (EU) No 1079/2012 will be transposed after 2014. ‐ Planned

31/12/2017

ASP (By:12/2018)

SMATSA ‐ ‐ Planned

31/12/2018

Military Authority

Voice communication systems have already been upgraded to support 8.33.

‐ Planned

31/12/2018

MIL (By:12/2020)

Military Authority

There are no military ANSPs in Serbia. SMATSA is providing service for both civil and military users. Equipage of State aircraft will not be economically nor operationally justified.

‐ No Plan

‐

APO (By:12/2018)

Belgrade Airport

Pending the transposition of relevant regulation. ‐ Planned

31/12/2018

Military Authority

‐ ‐ Planned

31/12/2018


ITY‐COTR

Implementation of ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes

Timescales:

Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012 Systems serving ACCs providing services above FL285 in the airspace defined in Regulation (EU) 2015/310: 05/02/2018

Completed

‐

Regulations (EU) 1034/2011 and 552/2004 transposed into national regulation. The objective done within the framework of the FAMUS project.

31/05/2012

ASP (By:02/2018)

SMATSA The objective done within the framework of the FAMUS project. CPDLC Completed

31/05/2011

MIL (By:12/2012)

Military Authority

Military has no role in ATS provision. ‐ Not Applicable

‐

ITY‐FMTP

Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP)

Timescales:

Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014

Completed

‐

Regulations (EC) No 633/2007, (EU) 283/2011, (EU) 1034/2011 and (EC) 552/2004 transposed into national regulation. ATM‐system was enhanced to support OLDI over IP v.6 according to the FAMUS implementation schedule. Currently, there are 6 of 9 operational IPv6 connections. OLDI partners Tirana, Skopje and Brinidisi are still using X.25 connections. SMATSA is waiting those OLDI partners to become ready for IPv6 implementation.

30/06/2013

ASP (By:12/2014)

SMATSA

OLDI over IP v.6 implemented through FAMUS project. Currently, there are 6 of 9 operational IPv6 connections. OLDI partners Tirana, Skopje and Brinidisi are still using X.25 connections. SMATSA is waiting those OLDI partners to become ready for IPv6 implementation.

CPDLC / PENS

Completed

30/06/2013

MIL (By:12/2014)

Military Authority

Military has no role in ATS provision. ‐ Not Applicable

‐


ITY‐SPI

Surveillance performance and interoperability

Timescales:

Entry intro force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 New aircraft capability: 08/06/2016 ELS in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/12/2017 EHS and ADS‐B Out in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020

Late

‐

SMATSA is conducting activities to meet the interoperability requirements for surveillance data. CAD conducts safety oversight according to the established procedures and as prescribed in the amended "Regulation on requirements, issuing and validity period of the certificate for providing air navigation services" ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia", No 32/11, 54/12 and 24/13) and "Regulation on transposition of EU regulation on the interoperability of the European Air Traffic Management network" (Official Gazette RS No 69/11).

31/12/2016

REG (By:02/2015)

CAD

Regulations (EU) 1034/2011 and 1035/2011 transposed through the amended "Regulation on requirements, issuing and validity period of the certificate for providing air navigation services" ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia", No 32/11, 54/12 and 24/13). Regulation (EC) 552/2004 amended by (EC) 1070/2009 transposed through the "Regulation on transposition of EU regulation on the interoperability of the European Air Traffic Management network" (Official Gazette RS No 69/11).

‐

Late

31/12/2016

ASP (By:02/2015)

SMATSA SMATSA is conducting activities to meet the interoperability requirements for surveillance data.

Enhanced Mode‐S / Secondary radar / Surveillance data real time analysis system

Late

31/12/2016

MIL (By:06/2020)

Military Authority

Military has no role in service provision, while the equipage of State aircraft is not technically or operationally justified, taking into account the age of the fleet.

‐ Not Applicable

‐

NAV03

Implementation of P‐RNAV

Timescales:


Completed

‐

Adopted PBN Manual upon consultations with relevant stakeholders. ANSP has implemented RNAV‐1/RNP1 in accordance with PBN Manual.

31/12/2014

ASP (By:12/2023)

SMATSA SMATSA has implemented RNAV‐1/RNP1 for Belgrade airport and RNP1 for all other airports in accordance with PBN Manual.

‐ Completed

31/12/2014


NAV10

Implement APV procedures

Timescales:


No Plan

‐

While AMCs regarding airworthiness approval are directly applied and linked to relevant EASA regulations, currently only tentative plans exist regarding this objective.

31/12/2016

REG (By:04/2016)

CAD

AMCs are applied directly according to the Regulation on airworthiness and environmental certification of aircraft and related products, parts and appliances and on issue of licenses for technical operations to design and production organisations (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, No 2/11).

‐

Completed

26/01/2011

ASP (By:12/2016)

SMATSA Currently only tentative plans exist regarding this objective. ‐ No Plan

31/12/2016

SAF10

Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements

Timescales:


Late

‐

CAD is committed to applying the recommendations from the European Action Plan ‐ Airspace Infringement Risk Reduction. Service provider is planning to implement measures to reduce risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements.

31/05/2018

REG (By:12/2011)

CAD CAD is committed to applying the recommendations from the European Action Plan ‐ Airspace Infringement Risk Reduction.

‐ Late

31/05/2018

ASP (By:12/2011)

SMATSA FIS service is provided as part of ATC services and separate service implementation is planned for 2018.

‐ Late

31/05/2018

MIL (By:12/2011)

Military Authority

There are no military ANSPs in Serbia. SMATSA is providing services for both civil and military users.

‐ Not Applicable

‐


SAF11

Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions

Timescales:


Completed

‐

Runway Safety Team established for Belgrade Airport. Active members of the team are Belgrade Airport, SMATSA and Air Serbia. Appropriate parts of the EAPPRE to be implemented by relevant stakeholders.

31/12/2015

REG (By:01/2018)

CAD

Appropriate parts of the EAPPRE to be implemented through Regulation on airports, Regulation on establishing SMS and Regulation for airport maintenance. CAD has a role as an observer in the Runway Safety Team along with conducting regular safety oversight. Framework RST Agreement was signed in the first quarter of 2015.

‐

Completed

31/12/2015

ASP (By:12/2014)

SMATSA SMATSA has implemented the appropriate parts of the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions.

‐ Completed

31/12/2013

APO (By:12/2014)

Belgrade Airport

Appropriate parts of the EAPPRE to be implemented through SMS. ‐ Completed

31/12/2014


Annexes

Annex A – Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process

LSSIP Co-ordination

LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name

LSSIP Focal Point for Serbia SMATSA Bojan Savnik

LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA CAD Nataša Kočović

LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP SMATSA Bojan Savnik

EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support

Function Directorate Name

LSSIP Contact Person for Serbia DPS/PEPR Octavian Cioara

ESSIP Objective Implementation

ESSIP Objective

EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator

National Stakeholder Specialist(s)

AOM13.1 R. BUCUROIU, O. MROWICKI, C. LUCCIOLI, E. REUBER

A. DYBOWSKA Žarko Katančević(CAD)

Goran Živanović (SMATSA)

AOM19 G. ACAMPORA, O. MROWICKI A. DYBOWSKA Goran Živanović (SMATSA)

AOM21.1 R. BUCUROIU

A. DYBOWSKA Žarko Katančević (CAD)

Danijel Miler (SMATSA)

AOM21.2 R. BUCUROIU

A. DYBOWSKA Žarko Katančević (CAD)

Danijel Miler (SMATSA)

AOP03 T. LICU

P. VRANJKOVIC Vladimir Pavlović (CAD)

Dejan Jocić (SMATSA)

AOP04.1 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC Srećko Mitrić (SMATSA)

AOP04.2 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC Srećko Mitrić (SMATSA)

AOP05 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC N/A

AOP10 M. BIRENHEIDE B. HILL N/A

AOP11 M. BIRENHEIDE B. HILL N/A

AOP12 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC N/A

ATC02.5 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI

I. FEIJT Žarko Katančević(CAD)



I. FEIJT Žarko Katančević (CAD)



I. FEIJT Žarko Katančević (CAD)


ATC07.1 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI

L. DELL’ORTO Mirjana Vasiljević (SMATSA) Srećko Mitrić (SMATSA)

ATC12.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO Goran Živanović (SMATSA)

ATC15 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO Mirjana Vasiljević (SMATSA)

ATC16 S. DROZDOWSKI

L. DELL’ORTO Nemanja Jović (CAD)

Petar Sekulić (CAD)

ATC17 S. MORTON

L. DELL’ORTO Mirjana Vasiljević (SMATSA) Srećko Mitrić (SMATSA)


ESSIP Objective

EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator

National Stakeholder Specialist(s)

COM10 Y. EYUBOGLU

A. KOKONA Đorđe Metikoš (SMATSA)

Marko Trnavac (SMATSA)

COM11 L. POPESCU

A. KOKONA Irena Knežević (CAD)

Natalija Golubović (SMATSA)

ENV01 C. FABER

B. HILL Vojislav Bijelić (SMATSA)

Srećko Mitrić (SMATSA)

ENV02 S. MAHONY, A. WATT B. HILL N/A

FCM01 H. KOOLEN O. CIOARA Željko Šokćić (SMATSA)

FCM03 TBD O. CIOARA Željko Šokćić (SMATSA)

FCM04 P. HOP O. CIOARA Željko Šokćić (SMATSA)

FCM05 I. MENDES O. CIOARA Željko Šokćić (SMATSA)

FCM06 P. HOP O. ALFARO N/A

INF04 P. MATERN

A-P. FRANGOLHO Marko Ljubičić (SMATSA)

Dragan Radovanović (SMATSA)

INF07 A. PETROVSKY

A-P. FRANGOLHO Danijela Maksimović (CAD) Đorđe Samrdžija (SMATSA)

ITY-ACID A. DESMOND-KENNEDY

O. CIOARA Srećko Mitrić (SMATSA)

Đorđe Zečević (SMATSA)

ITY-ADQ M. UNTERREINER

A-P. FRANGOLHO Nina Tomić (CAD)

Đorđe Samardžija (SMATSA)

ITY-AGDL S. DISSING

A. KOKONA Nina Tomić (CAD)

Zoran Latifić (SMATSA)

ITY-AGVCS2 J POUZET O. ALFARO Radmila Papulić (SMATSA)

ITY-COTR S. MORTON

L. DELL’ORTO Nina Tomić (CAD)

Mirjana Vasiljević (SMATSA)

ITY-FMTP L. POPESCU

O. ALFARO Nina Tomić (CAD)

Miroslav Glavonjić (SMATSA)

ITY-SPI M. BORELY, R. STEWART O. CIOARA Nina Tomić (CAD)

NAV03 F. PAVLICEVIC

A. KOKONA Žarko Katančević (CAD)

Vojislav Bijelić (SMATSA)

NAV10 R. FARNWORTH

A. KOKONA Petar Sekulić (CAD)

Vojislav Bijelić (SMATSA)

SAF10 T. LICU

I. FEIJT Miroslav Belotić (CAD)

DejanJocić (SMATSA)

SAF11

S. LAWRENCE

I. FEIJT Vladimir Pavlović (CAD)

Nataša Kočović (CAD)

Dejan Jocić (SMATSA)


Annex B – National Stakeholders Organisation Charts

Organisational scheme of the Civil Aviation Directorate of the Republic of Serbia



Annex C – Glossary of Abbreviations

Specific abbreviations for Serbia:

ATCC Air Traffic Control Centre

CAD Civil Aviation Directorate of the Republic of Serbia

FAMUS Future Air Traffic Management Modernization and Upgrade System

ISIS Implementation of SES in South East Europe

SMATSA Serbia and Montenegro Air Traffic Services SMATSA llc

Date post:	24-Aug-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times