+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

Date post: 31-Mar-2015
Category:
Upload: kenna-beaman
View: 216 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
31
Transcript
Page 1: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.
Page 2: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

Loss Aversion and IncentivesOmission Bias

Evaluating TalentMomentum vs. Luck

Page 3: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

Loss Aversion and Incentives

• In 4th down situations where (statistically) it’s better to go for it, NFL coaches punt/kick 96% of the time

• There are some exceptions . . .

• But didn’t used to be this way

Page 4: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

2009 Patriots vs. Colts

• 4th and 2 on own 28 yard line, up 34-28

*embed movie of play here*

Page 5: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

Deviating from convention can be risky

• “My vocabulary is not big enough to describe the insanity of this decision”—Trent Dilfer, former NFL QB and ESPN analyst

• “Ghastly . . . Too smart for his own good this time. The sin of hubris”—Dan Shaughnessy, Boston Globe

• “Fourth-and-jack-ass. That’s our name for a now-infamous play in New England Patriot’s history”—Pete Prisco, CBS

Page 6: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

Omission Bias(3 ball vs. 2 strike counts)

Page 7: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

Omission Bias(3-0 vs. 0-2 counts)

Page 8: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

Omission Bias

• Super Bowl XLII: Giants vs. Patriots

Page 9: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

Omission Bias

• 2009 U.S. Open Tennis Championship

Page 10: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

Omission Bias

• 1993 NCAA Basketball ChampionshipMichigan vs. NC

*embed movie here*

Page 11: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

Evaluating Talent

1998 NFL Draft: Two “franchise” QBs

Page 12: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

Evaluating Talent

Less than 10 years later . . .

Page 13: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

Estimated Trade Value of Draft Picks0

.2.4

.6.8

1V

alu

e R

ela

tive

to

#1

Pic

k

1 33 65 97 129 161Overall Draft Pick

Top pick acquired (all possible)Picks exchanged for top pick (observed)

Page 14: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

14

Evaluating Talent

Early picks are very highly valued:#1 = #10+#11 = #29+#30+#31+#32

You have to pay about the same

Does this match future performance?

Page 15: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

15

Probability “Better Than The Next Guy”0

.1.2

.3.4

.5.6

.7P

roba

bilit

y

1 2 3 4 5 6 7By draft round

Average=.52

Page 16: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

Evaluating Talent is Risky• 9 of last 12 #1 picks have been QB’s

Page 17: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

Who Else Could You Have Had?

= + a 3rd round pick

= +

Page 18: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

Evaluating Talent in the NFL

• What were the #1’s worth?

1x 6,000x 2x 1.5x 3x

Page 19: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

Evaluating Talent

How do you hire and fire people?

How confident are you in your ability to judge performance?

Page 20: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

The Myth of Momentum

• Quiz #1: Which of the following is the best predictor?

a) Performance over last 5 attemptsb) Performance over last 5 gamesc) Performance over last monthd) Performance over seasone) Performance over multiple seasons

Page 21: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

The Myth of Momentum

• Quiz #2: Heading into playoffs, which of the following is the best predictor of success?

a) Performance in most recent gameb) Performance in last weekc) Performance in last monthd) Performance over entire regular season

Page 22: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

Fooled by Randomness

• Flip a coin 10 times . . . Which sequence is more likely to be random?1. HTHTHTHTHT2. HHHHHHHHHH3. HHHTHHTTHT

• Which Lotto number is more likely to win?1. 999992. 13679

Page 23: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

Damned Statistics

• What does “4 out of his last 5” really mean?

• Is a player 0 for 12 “due” to hit his 13th or doomed to miss it?

• Situational or conditional statistics

Page 24: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

24

Momentum in Financial Markets

Momentum is the phenomenon that stocks

which have performed well in the past

relative to other stocks (winners) continue

to perform well in the future, and stocks

that have performed relatively poorly

(losers) continue to perform poorly.

24

Page 25: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

25

Academic Discovery

Jegadeeshand

Titman

1993

Asness

1994 1996

Chan, Jegadeesh, and Lakonishok

Fama and French: “…[T]he main embarrassment of the three-factor model, [is] its failure to capture the

continuation of short-term returns documented by Jegadeesh and Titman and Asness…[T]he continuation

anomaly exposes one of its shortcomings.”

1999

Moskowitz and Grinblatt

2004

Grinblatt and Moskowitz

2008

Asness, Moskowitz

and Pedersen

6 new working

papers from AQR

2011

Page 26: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

26

Historical Evidence from AcademiaAverage Returns for Portfolios Grouped by Momentum

1927 – 2009

* Source: CRSP Database. Data is based on monthly returns from overlapping portfolios. Momentum is calculated by ranking stocks based on their past 12-month return excluding the most recent month. Returns are in excess of the beta-adjusted CRSP Value Weighted Index. Past performance is not an indication of future performance.

6.0%

9.7%11.0%

13.6%

18.0%

-4.5%

1.1%

3.2%

5.8%

9.1%

-0.1

-0.05

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

P120% of stocks withWorst Momentum

P2 P3 P4 P520% of stocks withBest Momentum

An

nu

al R

etu

rn in

Su

bse

qu

ent

12 M

on

ths

(%)

Average Return of Each Quintile Excess Return of Each Quintile*

Page 27: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

27

Momentum is the Fourth Factor

SmB Factor is a long-short portfolio composed of small stocks minus big stocks by market capitalization. HmL Factor is a long-short portfolio composed of stocks with high book to price valuations minus stocks with low book to price valuations. UmD is a long-short portfolio composed of stocks with positive momentum minus stocks with negative momentum by looking at the last twelve months price return excluding the last month. Past performance is not an indication of future performance.

Since the mid-1990s, the standard for any asset pricing study is to adjust for 4 factors (betas):

Size Value Momentum

Annu

aliz

ed R

etur

n (%

)

27

Page 28: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

Out of Sample Evidence

• Small and large cap stocks• Industries• Bonds• Currencies• Index futures• Commodities• Corporate bonds• Emerging markets (all asset classes)• REITS

Page 29: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

Momentum in 58 Different Contracts

Page 30: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

Why?

1. Why does momentum exist in financial market prices, of all assets?

2. Why doesn’t momentum seem to exist in sports, all sports?

Page 31: Loss Aversion and Incentives Omission Bias Evaluating Talent Momentum vs. Luck.

Recommended