Malawi Government
MALAWI AID ATLAS 2010/11FY
Ministry of Finance P.O Box 30049 Lilongwe 3, Malawi Tel. (265) 01-789-355
Page | 2
FOREWORD
I am pleased to present the fourth edition of the Malawi Annual Aid Atlas, which details the
activities of each of Malawi’s Development Partners (DPs) during 2010/2011 Fiscal Year. In the
spirit of the Malawi Growth and Development Strategy (MGDS) and the Development Assistance
Strategy, the Aid Atlas presents the Government of Malawi’s ongoing commitment to improving
aid effectiveness and development effectiveness in Malawi.
The fourth edition mostly draws its inspiration from the 4th High Level Forum (HLF) on Aid
Effectiveness that was held in Busan, South Korea towards the end of 2011, which re-affirmed the
commitments made by the parties to the Paris Declaration and Accra Agenda for Action to
promote country ownership of development. The 4th HLF also placed strengthening of country
systems at the heart of the development efforts in line with the Paris Declaration and the Accra
Agenda for Action. Donors and partner countries committed to make better use of country-led
coordination mechanisms, including division of labour, as well as programme-based approaches,
joint programming and delegated cooperation. They confirmed that transparency about aid flows
is a shared principle and a foundation for effective development cooperation. This is also in line
with the objectives of the International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI) which many DPs today
are signing to.
Let me take this opportunity to confirm, once again, the Government’s commitment to improve
the quality of aid information in Malawi with the realization that high quality and reliable aid
information is an important tool for effective decision making, transparency and accountability for
results. For this to be possible, however, I would like to urge all our cooperating partners to
continue to provide us with timely aid information, including aid flows outside Government
structures. As most of our cooperating partners are now using the IATI format, I am confident that
the quality and transparency of aid data will continue to improve. On its part, the Malawi
Government has agreed to be one of the five countries that the IATI secretariat will work with to
see how aid data can easily be integrated into the budget.
I, therefore, wish to express my most profound gratitude to all our cooperating partners for their
continued support to our aid management efforts through the timely provision of aid data. I wish
you a happy reading of this fourth edition of our Annual Aid Atlas.
Randson Mwadiwa Secretary to the Treasury
Page | 3
CONTENTS
FOREWORD ....................................................................................................................................... 2
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 7
LIST OF ACRONYMS ......................................................................................................................... 14
KEY FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................. 16
OVERVIEW OF AID DISBURSEMENTS (2010/11FY) .......................................................................... 24
Reporting Behaviour of Development Partners (2011)* ................................................................ 25
Malawi Aid Map (2010/11FY).......................................................................................................... 26
Aid Disbursement by Donor (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY) .................................................................. 27
Aid Disbursement by Development Partner (2008/09FY -2010/11FY) ........................................... 28
Aid Disbursement by Sector by Modality (2008/09FY -2010/11FY) ............................................... 29
Aid Disbursement by Modality by Development Partner (2008/09FY -2010/11FY) ....................... 31
Aid Disbursement by Sector (2008/09FY -2010/11FY).................................................................... 33
AID EFFECTIVENESS ISSUES -2008/09FY – 2010/11FY .................................................................... 34
Flow Chart of Donor Use of Country Systems (2010/11 FY) ........................................................... 35
Proportion of Aid Delivered As Sector and General Budget Support ............................................. 36
Overview of Results of the 2011 Paris Declaration Monitoring Survey* ........................................ 37
Aid Disbursement by GoM, NGOs, and Other Implementing Partners* ........................................ 38
Project Implementing Units by Donor (2010/11FY) ........................................................................ 42
Aid Disbursement by Type (2010/11FY) .......................................................................................... 42
Aid Predictability by Modality by Donor (2010/11FY)* .................................................................. 43
General Budget Support Predictability by Development Partner (2010/11FY) .............................. 45
Farm Input Subsidy Program Pool Support Predictability by Development Partner
(2010/11FY) ..................................................................................................................................... 45
Health SSWAp Pool Predictability by Development Partner (2010/11FY) ...................................... 46
Page | 4
Aid Predictability for Education SWAp Pool by Development Partner (2010/11FY) ...................... 46
Aid Fragmentation by Development Partner (2010/11FY) ............................................................. 47
Aid Fragmentation by Sector (2010/11FY) ...................................................................................... 48
Illustrative Maps of location of aid projects from the pilot Geocoding Initiative ........................... 49
SECTOR ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................ 53
MGDS THEME 1: SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH ................................................................... 54
Agriculture (2010/11FY) .................................................................................................................. 55
Integrated Rural Development (2010/11FY) ................................................................................... 56
Environment, Lands and Natural Resources (2010/11FY) .............................................................. 57
Tourism, Wildlife and Culture (2010/11FY)..................................................................................... 58
Water, Sanitation and Irrigation (2010/11FY) ................................................................................. 59
Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development (2010/11FY) ...................................................... 60
MGDS THEME 2 – SOCIAL PROTECTION AND DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT ............................... 61
Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management (2010/11FY) ........................................................... 62
MGDS THEME 3 –SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT ....................................................................................... 63
Health (2010/11FY) ......................................................................................................................... 64
Education (2010/11FY) .................................................................................................................... 66
MGDS THEME 4 – INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT .................................................................... 68
Roads, Public Works and Transport (2010/11FY) ........................................................................... 69
Energy and Mining (2010/11FY) ...................................................................................................... 70
Information Technology (2010/11FY) ............................................................................................. 71
MGDS THEME 5 – IMPROVED GOVERNANCE ................................................................................. 72
Democratic Governance (2010/11FY) ............................................................................................. 73
Economic Governance (2010/11FY) ................................................................................................ 74
Public Administration 2010/11FY .................................................................................................... 75
DONOR ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................ 76
Page | 5
DONOR ANALYSIS –CABS DONORS ................................................................................................. 77
African Development Bank (2010/11FY) ......................................................................................... 78
European Union (2010/11FY) .......................................................................................................... 79
Norway (2010/11FY) ....................................................................................................................... 80
Department for International Development (2010/11FY) .............................................................. 81
World Bank (2010/11FY) ................................................................................................................. 82
German Development Cooperation (2010/11FY) ........................................................................... 83
DONOR ANALYSIS – DISCRETE DONORS ......................................................................................... 84
Australian Agency for International Development (2010/11FY) .................................................... 85
Canada (2010/11FY) ........................................................................................................................ 86
Centre for Disease Control (2010/11FY) ......................................................................................... 87
Flemish International Cooperation Agency (2010/11FY) ................................................................ 88
The Global Fund (2010/11FY) .......................................................................................................... 89
Iceland International Development Agency (2010/11FY) ............................................................... 90
International Fund for Agricultural Development (2010/11FY) ...................................................... 91
Ireland (2010/11FY) ......................................................................................................................... 92
Japan (2010/11FY ............................................................................................................................ 93
United States Agency for International Development (2010/11FY) ............................................... 94
DONOR ANALYSIS – UNITED NATIONS AGENCIES ........................................................................... 95
Food and Agriculture Organization (2010/11FY) ............................................................................ 96
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (2010/11FY) ...................................................... 97
United Nations Educational, Science and Cultural Organization (2010/11FY) ............................... 98
United Nations Industrial Development Organization (2010/11FY) ............................................... 99
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (2010/11FY) ........................................................ 100
United Nations Development Programme (2010/11FY) ............................................................... 101
United Nations Children’s Fund (2010/11FY) ............................................................................... 102
Page | 6
United Nations Population Fund (2010/11FY) .............................................................................. 103
World Food Programme (2010/11FY) ........................................................................................... 104
World Health Organization (2010/11FY) ....................................................................................... 105
DEVELOPMENT PARTNER ANALYSIS – EMERGING DONORS ........................................................ 106
People’s Republic of China (2010/11FY) ....................................................................................... 107
Republic of India (2010/11FY) ....................................................................................................... 108
Arab Bank for Economic Development (2010/11FY) .................................................................... 109
OPEC Fund (2010/11FY) ................................................................................................................ 110
Kuwait Fund................................................................................................................................... 111
ANNEX I: Definition and List of Project Implementing Units ............................................ 112
List of Project Implementing Units ................................................................................................ 113
Page | 7
INTRODUCTION
Aid Effectiveness Principles
The commitments made by both aid donors and aid recipients in the Paris Declaration (PD
2005) and Accra Agenda for Action (AAA 2008), highlight the importance of establishing
stronger links between donor activities and the planning and budgeting cycles of recipient
governments. For Malawi the localization of these principles is articulated within the
Government of Malawi (GoM) Development Assistance Strategy (DAS 2008). These
commitments have been recently reconfirmed at the 4th High Level Forum on Aid
Effectiveness in Busan, South Korea, which established a new Partnership for Effective
Development Cooperation.
Aid Transparency in the Busan Outcome Document
The Busan outcome document, agreed on 1st December 2011, has resulted in three
important developments for aid transparency within the aid effectiveness process:
- Donors, partner countries and civil society have agreed that transparency is a shared
principle and foundation for effective development cooperation; (§ 11d)
- Donors have made time-bound commitments to fully publish their aid information to the
common standard (IATI – International Aid Transparency Initiative); (§ 23c)
- Donors have strengthened their commitment to improving medium-term predictability by
2013. (§ 24)
At the country level the focus is on establishing transparent public financial management
and aid information management systems, and strengthen the capacities of all relevant
stakeholders to make better use of this information in decision-making and to promote
accountability.
Malawi’s Aid Management Platform
Page | 8
In an effort to enhance transparency and accountability on the use of foreign aid in 2008 the GoM
established an aid information management system known as Malawi’s Aid Management
Platform (AMP). AMP is a customized web-based tool allowing Government and donors to track
and share information related to aid-funded activities, create customized reports, and coordinate
activities.
AMP is now fully integrated in Government’s decision-making system and is the primary
tool for managing aid information in Malawi. It currently holds over 900 aid related
activities and plays a significant role in compiling aid reports and assisting with the aid
coordination process.
Most development partners still use the excel-based template developed by the Ministry
of Finance and Development Planning (MoFDP) to report their aid data. The Government
then validates and enters this data on AMP. Since 2009, the MoFDP has been working
toward establishing a fully online AMP which allows donors to log-in remotely and enter
the data directly into the system themselves. Following substantial IT upgrades and donor
training and connectivity testing, this online system is now available. Several donors are
already uploading their disbursement data directly on AMP. The Government is working on
improving internet connectivity which will increase the number of donors using the online
AMP. A recent onsite connectivity test indicated that some development partners cannot
access the online AMP due to internet connectivity problems at their offices. The
Government has invited such partners to resolve these issues to enable full access to AMP.
Box 1: Advantages of the online AMP
- The online AMP allows ministry’s staff to focus more on the analysis of donor
behavior and on verifying and supporting the quality of inputs being made by the
donors. It reduces the potential for errors in the database with the development
partners being responsible for managing their aid profiles on AMP.
- The online system will allow donors to have real-time access to data on all donor
activities across Malawi. This will help to improve sector planning and will allow
donors to generate a better understanding of each other’s activities, promoting a
Page | 9
greater level of harmonization and collaboration.
Purpose of the Aid Atlas
The primary purpose of the Annual Aid Atlas is to provide a snapshot of donor involvement
in development activities across all sectors of the Malawi economy. In support of IATI and
other aid transparency initiatives, information contained in this Aid Atlas should be used to
enhance better planning for development and support the implementation of aid
effectiveness principles such as harmonization and alignment of donor activities with
national development agenda and systems. For the public, information contained in here
provides a basis for holding the Government and development partners accountable for
development results in different sectors. The analysis that follows focuses on Official
Development Assistance (ODA) in its entirety – inclusive of both loans and grants to the
GoM. For each of the CABS donors, budget support is included under the economic
governance sector.
Data Source
The source of aid information is the development partners who provide development
assistance to Malawi. On a monthly basis the MoFDP collaborates with donors to provide
aid information which includes detailed project information such as planned and actual
disbursement figures for projects they support for the current financial year and projected
disbursements for coming fiscal years. This information is subsequently fed into the AMP.
The accuracy of the data is determined by the MoFDP’s ability to effectively manage the
AMP, and the donors’ ability to provide timely and reliable figures. The use of such figures
is based on trust since there is no real mechanism to confirm whether the disbursement
figures provided by development partners are true, unless the funds pass through the
Reserve Bank of Malawi or the receipts are confirmed by the recipients (project
implementing partners).
To facilitate the provision of aid data to MoFDP, the Government collaborated with the
development partners to establish donor focal agents (DFAs) for each donor partner active
Page | 10
in Malawi. The DFAs play a key role in submitting timely aid flow data to the MoFDP. While
there are still lags in the monthly reporting schedule, efforts made by the Government and
its development partners in capturing aid information have resulted in a marked
improvement in the quality of existing data, and the inclusion of partners previously
unaccounted for in the GoM’s official statistics.
There may be some differences in figures presented in this edition of the Aid Atlas
compared to the 2009/10FY Aid Atlas. This is due to some correction and reclassification of
entries made in AMP.
Definitions of Modalities of Aid Delivery
The GoM classifies donor activities under a number of category definitions. These
classifications are critical for tracking where and how aid funds are spent and their
inclusion into the budget process. The aid modality classifications are as follows:
1) General Budget Support: This is budgetary support that is provided to the
Government of Malawi for use without any restrictions or conditions regarding
which sector or project the money is spent on. It is deposited into the
Consolidated Account No.1 at the Reserve Bank of Malawi.
2) Farm Input Subsidy Program Support - Pooled: This is support that is
provided to the Government of Malawi to use for its agricultural inputs subsidy
program. It is deposited into the pooled Food Security Account at the Reserve
Bank of Malawi.
3) Farm Input Subsidy Program Support - Discrete: This is budgetary support
that is provided to the Government’s agricultural inputs subsidy program but
which does not use the RBM account. It typically involves donors purchasing
seeds and fertilizers as well as meeting transportation costs on behalf of GoM.
4) Health SWAP – Pooled: This includes funds which are deposited to the Pooled
Health SWAp account at the Reserve Bank of Malawi under the stipulations of
the Health Joint Financing Agreement.
Page | 11
5) Health SWAP – Discrete: This includes all funds which are disbursed in
support of the Health SWAp but which are not deposited into the Pooled Health
SWAp account at the Reserve Bank of Malawi. This may include direct project
support activities carried out on behalf of the Health SWAp Secretariat or
technical assistance provided to the Secretariat. This also includes all foreign
currency transactions taken on behalf of the Health SWAp Secretariat to procure
goods and services internationally.
6) National Aids Commission (NAC) Support: This includes all funds given in
support of the National Aids Commission and deposited into the NAC Account at
the Reserve Bank of Malawi.
7) Agriculture SWAp – Pooled*: This includes funds which are deposited to the
Pooled Agriculture SWAp account at the Reserve Bank of Malawi under the
stipulations of the Agriculture Joint Financing Agreement.
8) Agriculture SWAp –Discrete*: This includes all funds which are disbursed in
support of the Agriculture SWAp but which are not deposited into the Pooled
Agriculture SWAp account at the Reserve Bank of Malawi. This may include
direct project support activities carried out on behalf of the Agriculture SWAp
Secretariat or technical assistance provided to the Secretariat. This also includes
all foreign currency transactions taken on behalf of the Agriculture SWAp
Secretariat to procure goods and services internationally.
9) Road Sector –Pool: This includes all funds given in support of the Road Sector
and deposited into the Consolidated Account No.1 at the Reserve Bank of
Malawi. Currently, European Union is the only development partner committing
funds through this modality.
10) Direct Project Support: This is funding that has been allocated to specific
projects, such as the building of a school, or provision of technical assistance to a
Ministry. This funding can be channelled to a Government ministry, department
or agency, to Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) or managed by the donor
themselves through Project Implementation Units (PIUs).
Page | 12
* These modalities are not included in this document since they have just been
formalized recently but will be included in subsequent Aid Atlases.
Emerging Issues in this year’s Aid Atlas
This year’s Atlas builds on last year’s (2009/10FY Aid Atlas) which made a number of
improvements to previous editions including introduction of Aid Effectiveness Section,
inclusion of a full list of Project Implementing Units operating in Malawi, provision of more
detailed information on aid fragmentation, harmonization and aid modalities, as well as
data on Malawi’s emerging development partners. In addition, in this year’s Atlas we
present an overview of the results of the 2011 PD Monitoring Survey for Malawi. For the
first time the Aid Atlas includes information from the pilot geocoding initiative, which
tracks the location of all aid activities in the Malawi AMP. Government cooperated with
nearly all of its resident donor partners, gathering necessary information to geocode the
aid projects on AMP using an IATI-compliant methodology. Approximately 600 projects
have been mapped sub-nationally, which makes approximately 75% of total commitments
(US$5.6/$7.6 billion) and 71% of disbursements ($3.73/$5.25 billion) mapped. This
includes projects from 31 donors working in all 28 districts of Malawi. The mapping uses
socioeconomic indicators from the National Statistics Office to compare project locations
to local needs.
Another area that emerges as a high priority in this year’s Atlas is the Use of Country
Systems. To increase focus on development results, the Busan outcome document seeks
strong support for developing countries’ efforts to strengthen their policies and core
institutions, including through the creation of transparent and country-led results
frameworks and platforms. The document reaffirms the commitment made by parties to
the PD and Accra Agenda for Action to promote country ownership of development: using
country systems as the default approach for development cooperation and placing
strengthening of country systems at the heart of the development efforts. The GoM
recently put in place an overarching Public Finance and Economic Management Reform
Programme and several donors agreed on a joint donor Trust Fund to be managed by the
Page | 13
World Bank. These developments will continue to be monitored in the next editions of the
Aid Atlas.
It should also be pointed out that the Malawi’s AMP and the Aid Atlas which is being
produced on yearly basis have been referred to as a successful example of the benefits of
the collaboration between Government and the development partners and a good practice
from which other countries can learn. To maintain the vigilance of donor aid data
reporting, the MoFDP will continue to compile and publish information on ‘Reporting
Behaviour of Donors’ in the Aid Atlas.
Going forward, the Government would like to work more on the data entered into the
AMP to improve its quality and reliability. For instance, the Government has noted that
they is need to reclassify some sector definitions to ensure that projects are tagged to
sectors they really cover and the definitions should be well known by all DFAs. For
instance, most aid which is cross-cutting is currently classified under Economic Governance
Sector (for instance Budget Support), thereby indicating that the sector receives a lot of
support when this is not really the case. There is need to discuss on how best to capture
such information in terms of sector classifications. The same applies to Aid Modalities, not
all DFAs are well conversant with the different Modalities as such there are instances
whereby a project is tagged to a wrong modality. There is therefore need to work on this
with the DFAs.
The MoFDP welcomes feedback on this year’s edition of the Aid Atlas and wishes to
sincerely thank all the DFAs who have contributed to the production of this report. It is
hoped that the report and the data in it will serve as a catalyst for new discussions
between the Government and its donor partners on improving aid effectiveness in Malawi
and moving further towards fulfilling the country’s development goals.
Page | 14
LIST OF ACRONYMS
AAA Accra Agenda for Action
AfDB African Development Bank
AMP Aid Management Platform
CABS Common Approach to Budget Support
CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
CIDA Canadian International Development Assistance
DAS Development Assistance Strategy
DFA Donor Focal Agent for AMP
DfID Department for International Development
DoL Division of Labor
DFAs Donor Focal Agents for Aid Data
DNR Data Not Reported
DP Development Partner
EU European Union
FAO Food and Agriculture Organization
FICA Flemish International Cooperation Agency
FY Fiscal/ Financial Year
GDC German Development Cooperation
GoM Government of Malawi
HLF High Level Forum
ICEIDA Iceland International Development Assistance
IFAD International Fund Agriculture Development
JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency
MGDS Malawi Growth and Development Strategy
MoFDP Ministry of Finance and Development Planning
MoU Memorandum of Understanding
NAC National AIDS Commission
NGO Non-Governmental Organization
ODA Official Development Assistance
Page | 15
PD Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness
PIU Project Implementation Unit
PSIP Public Sector Investment Programme
SWAp Sector Wide Approach
SWG Sector Working Group
UN United Nations
UNAIDS The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS
UNCT United Nations Country Team
UNDP United National Development Program
UNESCO United Nations Economic and Social Commission
UNFPA United Nations Population Fund
UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund
UNIDO United Nations Industrial Development Organization
USAID United States Agency for International Development
WFP World Food Program
WHO World Health Organization
Page | 16
KEY FINDINGS
Overall aid disbursements remained stable in 2010/11FY. The GoM recorded
$1,022 million in donor disbursements during 2010/11FY. This constituted a 7%
increase from 2009/10FY, which recorded $955 million in donor disbursements.
Traditional donors continued to provide the majority of support. Amongst
traditional donors, USAID made the largest contribution to overall disbursements in
2010/11FY with $125 million in support. World Bank was the second largest donor
with $124 million in disbursements whilst DfID disbursed $110 million. Other major
donors included Global Fund ($109 million), EU ($97 million) and Norway ($41
million). EU and DfID have been Malawi’s largest donor partners for the past three
fiscal years, respectively contributing 11% and 14% of total ODA to Malawi in the
last three financial years (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY).
New donors continued to play an increasingly important role. The Peoples
Republic of China committed approximately $96 million of funds in 2010/11FY,
although at least half of this amount was disbursed as loans. The Republic of India
disbursed another $73 million and the Arab donors contributed $19 million. The
outcome document agreed at the 4th High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness in
Busan, South Korea embraces the presence of development actors other than
traditional donors and endorses them as integral parts of a new and more inclusive
development agenda.
ODA commitments have primarily been in the form of grants. In 2010/11FY,
grants contributed 76.3 percent of total receipts while 22.9 percent were disbursed
as loans. Loans are contracted to multilaterals like the AfDB, WB, 0PEC Fund, Kuwait
Page | 17
Fund, BADEA, and IFAD. A large proportion of funding from new donors like
People’s Republic of China and Republic of India is in the form of loans. Technical
assistance accounted for 0.8% of total aid. However, the actual proportion of
technical assistance is unclear, as donors do not generally report on it separately
from grants. This raises a concern about de facto tying of some aid, with source
country consultants and companies brought into the country to do work that could
potentially be done domestically. Un-reporting also makes it difficult to establish
the extent to which technical assistance has contributed to developing local
capacities.
Aid continues to be concentrated in a small number of sectors. Health was the
largest recipient sector of overall donor support in 2010/11FY, receiving 29% of
total aid flows. Education was the second biggest recipient with 16% of total
disbursements. The 6 largest recipient sectors (Health; Education; Economic
Governance; Road, Public Works and Transport; Water and Sanitation; and
Agriculture) received 84.2% of total annual disbursements. In contrast, the 6
smallest recipient sectors (Information Technology, Public Administration; Energy
and Mining; Gender, Youth Development and Sports; Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk
Management and Integrated Rural Development) received 5.4% of total annual
disbursements.
Fragmentation within priority sectors continues to remain high and in some
cases is increasing. The Health sector received assistance from 21 donor partners
across 115 activities in 2010/11FY. Likewise Agriculture received support from 12
donors across 82 projects, Economic Governance from 11 donors across 34 projects
(including budget support), Education 12 donors across 41 projects; Water,
Sanitation and Irrigation 10 donors across 17 projects and Roads, Public Works and
Transport had 8 donors across 17 projects. These figures show that even in sectors
Page | 18
in which functioning SWAp arrangements exist, the share of discrete projects is
high. These sectors include Health which received 56% of total sector funding for
discrete projects in 2010/11FY, meaning that the share of programme support was
only 44%. Education received 72% of sector funding for discrete projects, and out of
the total funding to Agriculture 62% was for discrete projects while the share of
programme support was only 38%.
The pilot geocoding initiative improved the ability to visualize data on local aid flows. Maps
included in the current Aid Atlas are illustrative to the results. More detailed interactive maps
with exact locations are available at: http://www.strausscenter.org/ccaps/mappingtool. The
information can be filtered to individual donors, sectors, funding levels, and years (using the
"advanced filter section"). It is also possible to view basic information for a project by clicking
on one of the individual locations (once zoomed in), or by clicking on the project name in the
popup that occurs once a location is selected. The MoFDP is working to import and display
these locations in the AMP, as a next stage of AMP’s development.
Box 2: Pilot geocoding initiative - Preliminary findings
Most of the active projects appear in the Central and Southern regions of Malawi, where
population is most dense. In these regions, there appears to be broad focus of the
donors throughout all of the districts. However, several of the poorest regions in the
country are in the Northern region, where donors are funding fewer activities.
Many donors are working in the same locations throughout the country. It needs to be
analyzed whether some projects represent a duplication of efforts, or if they are
complementary in nature.
Agriculture and fishery projects are funded throughout the country. However, there
does not appear to be a particular focus on the least food secure districts, where food
represents a higher proportion of overall household spending.
Page | 19
ODA commitments reported as untied have shown a general upward trend, but
some bilateral aid is still tied. Major donor countries like US made commitments at
the High Level Forum in Busan on untying their aid. The next editions of the Aid
Atlas will continue to monitor the situation at country level.
Some progress has been made in Use of Country Systems but aid disbursements
outside GoM structures remain large. This is largely attributed to the extensive use
of the traditional project approach, which remains the prevailing aid modality in
the country. Evidence shows that there is lack of use of country’s public financial
management and procurement systems for aid delivered as direct project support.
This is supported by analysis in the country report for Malawi under the 2011 PD
Monitoring Survey.
Limited progress has been made in increasing the proportion of aid delivered
as part of programme-based approaches. Budget support and sector support
reduced from 37% of total aid disbursements in 2009/10 FY to 34 % in 2010/11 FY.
General budget support decreased significantly from 24% in 2009/10FY and
accounted for only 10% of total aid disbursed in 2010/11FY while the proportion of
aid delivered as sector budget support increased from 13% to 24%. Direct project
support increased from 63% in 2009/10FY to 66% of total aid disbursements in
2010/11FY. 1 This negative trend is a concern, as experience in the past shows that
the use of programme based approaches (including SWAp) contributes to
improvements in alignment of aid to country’s development agenda.
1 The 2009/10 FY Aid Atlas reported that 45 % of total aid was delivered as budget support and sector support, which was an increase of 12
% compared to the previous financial year (2008/09FY). After some verification of data on AMP, the final figure for 2009/10 FY was set at 37 %. Direct project support for 2009/10 FY was initially reported as 55 %, but then adjusted to 63 %.
Page | 20
Key aid effectiveness targets have been missed. The 2011 Paris Declaration Monitoring
Survey reported that out of 12 indicators with targets that should have been reached by
2010, Malawi met 5 (operational development strategies, alignment of aid flows to
national priorities, strengthened capacity building through co-ordinated support,
predictability of aid, and mutual accountability). Since 2005, of the remaining indicators,
four have made progress, three have been set back and three remained static.
Performance on alignment has generally been good, while progress on harmonization has
been limited, with no targets met.
Box 3: Learning from Success and Challenges
Achievement or challenge Lesson or priority action
Ownership Achievement: The link
between the Malawi Growth
and Development Strategy and
sectoral planning and
budgeting has been enhanced,
although room for
improvement remains.
Lessons: The linkage of the MDGs
to sector planning and budgeting
have been further enhanced
through the establishment of 16
sector working groups headed by
principal secretaries with donors
acting as co-chairs, although there
is a need to increase their
operationality.
Alignment Achievement: Regular forums
are held between government
and donors to ensure the
budget is implemented in a
controlled and predictable
manner.
Lessons: Development and
implementation of capacity
building strategies across sectors
at every level of government.
Harmonisation Challenge: Limited Priority action: Full operationality
Page | 21
participation of major donors
in programme-based
approaches.
of sector working groups will help
to increase donor participation in
programme-based approaches
(PBAs) and reduce aid
fragmentation. Building trust
among donors can enhance
harmonisation.
Managing for results Challenge: Data does not have
the quality and reliability to
meet M&E requirements, and
routine data collection and
analysis are not yet
institutionalised at sector
levels. As a result there are
data gaps due to lack of skills,
and funding for M&E.
Priority action: Fill capacity gaps
in sector ministries and increase
monitoring system connectivity to
improve co-ordination and
responsiveness.
Mutual accountability Achievement: Presence of
several formalised institutional
arrangements between
government, donors, private
sector and civil society for
fostering mutual
accountability.
Lessons: Development co-
operation between government,
donors and civil society leads to
the adaptation of collaborative
approaches to address
development issues.
Source: OECD/DAC 2011 Paris Declaration Monitoring Survey, Country report on Malawi
Overall predictability was high but undermined by several factors.
Performance on donors delivering on promised aid was mixed. Some donors
suspended disbursements under general budget support due to concerns relating to
Page | 22
slow progress in meeting conditions under the CABS mechanism. The World Bank
did not make any disbursements against their committed amount for general
budget support for the fiscal year mainly because the government was not on the
IMF programme. GDC and Norway disbursed respectively only 25% and 50% of their
projected disbursements. On the other hand, AfDB and DfID disbursed as promised
while EU disbursement had only 14% shortfall from the committed amount.
Farm Input Subsidy Programme Pool support performed well in terms of
predictability with an overall disbursement of 94% of what was committed. DfID
over performed by 28% and Ireland disbursed as promised. The shortfall was due to
underfunding of respectively 12% and 13% by the EU and Norway. However,
Norway revised their initial commitment of NOK 20m to NOK 23m within the fiscal
year. Disregarding the revision of the commitment, we would say that Norway
disbursed 100% of what was committed.
Education SWAp Pool received 126% of its expected funding with the extra 26%
resulting from over performance of 259% by UNICEF even though the funding was
small in absolute figures. DfID had a shortfall of 17%. Health SWAp Pool and NAC
Support received far less than what was expected. Health SWAp received 55% of
the expected disbursements. UNFPA and UNICEF did not disburse their committed
amounts while GDC and Norway disbursed only 4% and 36% of their projected
funding respectively. This underperformance is mainly attributed to audit issues
which were identified by the forensic audit for the SWAp. For NAC, lack of
disbursement by the World Bank largely contributed to the underperformance of
NAC grants, which were only 44% of projected receipts. Provision of multi-year
funding projections is still a challenge. Currently, only few DPs are able to provide
reliable data for the next three to five years.
Donor partners continued to improve their reporting behaviour in 2010/11FY.
Most resident partners provide aid data to MoFDP on monthly basis, even though
Page | 23
there are some delays. Donors that are lagging behind include USAID, World Bank,
UNESCO, UNICEF and WHO. However, the World Bank provides information through
on-line client connection and WHO and UNICEF have been working on their
database and resume reporting soon. Non-resident partners usually provide aid
data very late within the fiscal year. Several development partners have started to
upload their aid data directly on AMP. The MoFDP wishes to acknowledge the
dedication of those development partners that have honored their aid reporting
commitment throughout the 2010/11FY, and especially AfDB, FICA, EU, Japan,
Germany (KfW), Norway, CDC, WFP, UNFPA and UNDP.
Page | 24
OVERVIEW OF AID DISBURSEMENTS (2010/11FY)
Page | 25
Reporting Behaviour of Development Partners (2011)* May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11
AfDB on-time on-time on-time late on-time On-time
CDC on-time on-time on-time late On-time
CIDA late late on-time late late late On-time
DfID on-time on-time DNR DNR DNR On-time
EU on-time on-time on-time on-time on time on time On-time On-time
FICA on-time on-time late on time on time on time
German GIZ** late late late late on time late On-time
German KFW on-time on-time on-time on time on time on time
Global Fund late late on-time late late late On-time On-time
ICEIDA late late DNR late late late On-time
IFAD late late DNR late late
Irish Aid on-time on-time DNR DNR on time
Japan on-time on-time on-time late on time on time
Norway on-time on-time late late on-time on time On-time On-time
USAID DNR DNR on time
World Bank*** DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR
ONE UN
FAO late late late late on time
UNAIDS late late on-time late DNR
UNDP on-time on-time Late late late on time on time
UNESCO DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR
UNFPA on-time on-time on-time late late
UNHCR late late on time DNR DNR
UNICEF on-time on-time DNR DNR DNR
UNIDO late late on time DNR DNR
WFP on-time on-time on time late on time on time
WHO**** DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR – data not reported * Due to lack of data for the other months, only data from May to December 2011 is presented in the table. Aid data for November and December 2011 continued to be received in January 2012 when this Atlas was finalized, hence changes are expected. **Disbursement reporting was disrupted by the introduction of on-line AMP absences due to leave by country GIZ officers. ***World Bank has not reported through excel templates but MoFDP is able to get aid data through the World Bank Client Connection automatic exchange. ****WHO has not been able to provide aid data since January 2011 to December 2011 because their aid data management system changed. Aid information for 2011 was provided in February 2012.
Page | 26
Malawi Aid Map (2010/11FY)
Note: Numbers represent number of active projects in each sector. Projects are deemed to be active if they made an actual disbursement during the fiscal year. For donor agencies, only those agencies and projects that are responsible for fund disbursement are listed as being active in the sector. For sectors, the Government has noted that there is need to do more work in redefining sector support when entering aid data in Aid Management Platform because some donor funds do not really fall under the sectors to which they are allocated in the System.
Page | 27
Aid Disbursement by Donor (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
USAID $74,198,462 $99,758,097 $124,503,992
World Bank $66,879,435 $139,070,065 $123,904,806
DfID $110,372,455 $96,551,021 $110,079,528
Global Fund $111,770,649 $29,428,797 $109,650,178
EU $138,817,040 $154,205,498 $96,806,731
Norway $58,574,174 $57,822,913 $40,565,123
Japan $22,514,693 $29,878,468 $30,973,912
AfDB $72,405,737 $62,484,831 $29,197,764
CDC $4,172,202 $11,365,622 $24,668,969
GDC $21,554,161 $27,260,340 $22,556,557
Of which Germany (KFW) $8,938,305 $17,008,174 $11,801,173
Germany (GIZ) $12,615,856 $10,252,166 $10,755,384
Arab Donors $1,278,340 $8,736,096 $18,769,722
Ireland $9,488,284 $15,289,905 $15,316,506
FICA $3,063,731 $6,212,154 $5,773,121
IFAD $4,557,746 $8,241,959 $4,432,371
Canada $10,859,976 $7,604,906 $3,803,546
ICEIDA $5,503,954 $2,254,485 $1,815,113
AusAID $0 $0 $1,500,000
ONE UN $91,354,088 $60,337,062 $88,572,013
UNFPA $34,568 $278,578 $3,254,130
UNICEF $0 $13,138,581 $34,613,753
WFP $45,282,166 $14,262,245 $22,168,270
UNDP $36,907,414 $21,825,982 $20,083,379
FAO $4,189,730 $3,938,388 $3,518,605
WHO $2,270,658 $4,945,726 $2,749,299
UNHCR $854,244 $945,606 $819,072
UNAIDS $333,689 $488,773 $599,231
UNIDO $1,481,619 $463,310 $511,732
UNESCO $0 $49,873 $254,542
People's Republic of China* $0 $133,300,000 $96,151,399
Republic of India* $65,028 $5,591,312 $73,357,388
TOTAL $807,430,156 $955,393,530 $1,022,398,739
*Approximate disbursement figures for the Republic of China and the Republic of India are included in this Atlas for 2008/09FY and 2009/10FY as a point of comparison with the other donors. This is due to insufficient detail of the data from these development partners.
Page | 28
Aid Disbursement by Development Partner (2008/09FY -2010/11FY)
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160
$180
Million USD
2008/09FY
2009/10FY
2010/11FY
Page | 29
Aid Disbursement by Sector by Modality (2008/09FY -2010/11FY)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
Agriculture $67,446,443 $115,853,927 $79, 729,345
Budget Support (EU Food Facility) $0 $21,590,186 $0
Direct Project Support $45,532,081 $64,000,322 $43,795,511
Farm Input Subsidy Program - Discrete $10,625,473 $7,055,228 $4,654,841
Farm Input Subsidy Program - Pooled $11,288,889 $23,208,191 $30,171,475
Democratic Governance $64,497,758 $74,168,590 $18,103,206
Direct Project Support $64,497,758 $74,168,590 $18,103,206
Economic Governance $181,823,712 $224,472,799 $126,611,618
Budget Support $164,483,596 $206,979,860 $100,408,850
Direct Project Support $17,340,116 $17,492,939 $25,935,618
Education $73,383,459 $101,905,529 $167,676,973
Direct Project Support $71,676,003 $90,899,215 $113,078,082
Education SWAp - Discrete $1,707,457 $10,976,983 $8,373,650
Education SWAp - Pooled $0 $29,330 $46,225,241
Energy and Mining $1,744,255 $3,624,115 $4,819,394
Direct Project Support $1,744,255 $3,624,115 $4,819,394
Environment, Lands and Natural Resources $17,841,528 $19,577,513 $26,121,112
Direct Project Support $17,841,528 $19,577,513 $26,121,112
Gender, Youth Development and Sports $10,887,100 $5,345,455 $8,954,127
Direct Project Support $10,887,100 $5,345,455 $8,526,053
HEALTH $254,019,865 $191,780,695 $298,199,442
Direct Project Support $80,235,597 $104,838,695 $144,272,944
Health SWAp - Discrete $6,774,527 $3,957,356 $21,395,398
Health SWAp - Pooled $78,388,242 $48,063,421 $79,728,702
Sector Support - NAC $88,621,500 $34,921,222 $52,802,295
Information Technology $888,386 $9,633,484 $823,593
Page | 30
Direct Project Support $888,386 $9,633,484 $823,593
Integrated Rural Development $21,131,276 $16,914,477 $11,785,985
Direct Project Support $21,131,276 $16,914,477 $11,785,985
Public Administration $2,064,679 $5,512,247 $9,242,094
Direct Project Support $2,064,679 $5,512,247 $9,242,094
Roads, Public Works and Transport $44,381,338 $61,242,346 $99,245,198
Direct Project Support $44,381,338 $61,242,346 $99,245,198
Road Sector-Pooled $0 $0 $0
Tourism, Wildlife and Culture $705,789 $30,699,016 $33,549,073
Direct Project Support $705,789 $30,699,016 $33,549,073
Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development $7,635,528 $5,872,146 $28,111,982
Direct Project Support $7,635,528 $5,872,146 $28,111,982
Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management $31,484,842 $18,128,441 $19,984,024
Direct Project Support $31,484,842 $18,128,441 $19,984,024
Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $27,364,286 $70,429,975 $89,304,971
Direct Project Support $27,364,286 $70,429,975 $89,304,971
TOTAL $807,430,156 $955,393,530 $1,022,398,739
Page | 31
Aid Disbursement by Modality by Development Partner (2008/09FY -
2010/11FY)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
Budget Support $164,483,596 $228,570,046 $100,408,850
AfDB $37,817,562 $12,012,879 $5,160,183
DfID $40,468,766 $29,835,885 $29,644,156
EU $45,317,659 $110,052,752 $56,372,458
GDC (Germany -KFW) $0 $13,081,661 $3,303,306
Norway $10,879,608 $11,059,439 $5,779,344
World Bank $30,000,000 $52,527,429 $149,403
Direct Project Support $444,778,807 $598,496,007 $678,309,376
USAID $74,198,462 $99,758,097 $124,503,992
World Bank $33,190,233 $86,542,636 $103,574,803
ONE UN $91,058,522 $60,277,062 $87,585,231
Japan $22,514,693 $29,878,468 $30,973,912
CDC $4,024,497 $11,365,622 $24,668,969
EU $86,272,798 $32,127,206 $23,317,811
Norway $29,137,983 $25,342,640 $24,842,750
DfID $33,844,733 $33,129,605 $20,576,510
Arab Donors $1,278,340 $8,736,096 $18,769,722
GDC $14,247,383 $10,541,311 $11,581,002
Germany (GIZ) $12,615,865 $10,252,166 $10,755,384
Germany (KFW) $1,631,518 $289,145 $825,618
AfDB $26,582,600 $36,303,908 $11,707,208
Ireland $4,427,538 $4,037,435 $10,775,514
AusAID $0 $0 $1,500,000
Canada $10,810,565 $7,604,906 $3,803,546
FICA $3,063,731 $3,463,261 $4,372,134
ICEIDA $5,503,954 $2,254,485 $1,815,113
IFAD $4,557,746 $8,241,959 $4,432,371
People's Republic of China* $0 $133,300,000 $96,151,399
Republic of India* $65,028 $5,591,312 $73,357,388
Education SWAp - Discrete $1,707,457 $10,976,983 $8,373,650
AfDB $1,707,457 $10,745,544 $7,511,129
DfID $0 $231,439 $862,522
Education SWAp - Pooled $0 $29,330 $46,225,241
DfID $0 $29,330 $18,052,963
GDC (Germany -KFW) $0 $0 $7,343,337
Page | 32
UNICEF $0 $0 $648,341
World Bank $0 $0 $20,180,600
Farm Input Subsidy Program - Discrete $10,625,473 $7,055,228 $4,654,841
DfID $298,928 $429,943 $616,478
EU $7,226,583 $144,148 $1,579,297
Ireland $3,099,962 $6,481,137 $2,459,066
Farm Input Subsidy Program - Pooled $11,288,889 $23,208,191 $30,171,475
DfID $7,217,777 $6,555,466 $9,214,319
EU $0 $11,881,391 $15,537,165
Ireland $1,960,784 $4,771,334 $2,081,926
Norway $2,110,328 $0 $3,338,066
Health SWAp - Discrete $6,774,527 $3,957,356 $21,395,398
AfDB $6,298,118 $3,422,500 $4,819,244
DfID $476,409 $534,857 $492,404
Global Fund $0 $0 $16,083,750
Health SWAp - Pooled $78,388,242 $48,063,421 $79,728,701
DfID $20,706,091 $19,007,280 $24,083,548
FICA $0 $2,748,893 $1,400,987
GDC (Germany -KFW) $6,692,816 $3,521,623 $0
Global Fund $33,869,706 $3,721,540 $47,339,202
Norway $14,119,628 $19,064,085 $6,604,964
UNFPA $0 $0 $0
UNICEF $0 $0 $300,000
World Bank $3,000,000 $0 $0
Road Sector-Pooled $0 $0 $0
EU $0 $0 $0
Sector Support - NAC $88,621,500 $34,921,222 $52,802,295
Canada $49,411 $0 $0
DfID $7,359,750 $6,797,216 $6,536,628
Global Fund $77,900,943 $25,707,257 $46,227,226
Norway $2,326,627 $2,356,749 $0
UNAIDS $295,566 $60,000 $38,441
World Bank $689,202 $0 $0
TOTAL $807,430,156 $955,393,530 $1,022,398,739
Page | 33
Aid Disbursement by Sector (2008/09FY -2010/11FY)
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
Million USD
2008/09FY
2009/10FY
2010/11FY
Aid Disbursement by Modality (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY)
Page | 34
AID EFFECTIVENESS ISSUES -2008/09FY – 2010/11FY
Page | 35
Flow Chart of Donor Use of Country Systems (2010/11 FY)
Donor Funded
Projects
Implemented via
NGOs
Extra Budgetary
Support (Off-
PSIP, Off Budget,
Off Treasury)
Funds Use
Commercial Bank
Accounts
No Use of Country Systems
Funds Use RBM Bank
Account
Funds use part 1
Development
Accounts
Funds Use
Consolidated
Accounts Funds allocated
to specific
Vote/Sector
Funds
unallocated
Sector Support
(On PSIP, On
Budget, On
Treasury)
General Budget
Support (On PSIP,
On Budget, On
Treasury)
Project Support
(On PSIP, On
Budget, On
Treasury)
Project Support
(On PSIP, On
Budget, On
Treasury)
Project Support
(On PSIP, On
Budget, On
Treasury)
Full Use of Country Systems
Partial Use of Country Systems
Implemented via
GoM Ministry
GoM
Authorizes
and processes
payments
Donor
Authorizes
and processes
payments
35% Total ODA
20% Total ODA
10% Total ODA
7% Total ODA
28% Total ODA
*Percentages indicate proportion of total aid flows ($1,021m) allocated to each aid modality during the 2010/11 FY. On-Budget indicates that Government procurement and audit systems are also being used. Further work on decomposing the ODA that uses Government Implementing Agencies but with Commercial Bank accounts between Donor and GoM disbursement authorization is currently underway.
Page | 36
Aid Disbursement Using Country Systems Aid Disbursement Using Country
Systems
Proportion of Aid Delivered As Sector and General Budget Support
Page | 37
Overview of Results of the 2011 Paris Declaration Monitoring Survey*
*Source: OECD Secretariat, final draft Malawi 2011 PD Survey Chapter
Page | 38
Aid Disbursement by GoM, NGOs, and Other Implementing Partners*
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
GoM Implementing Partners (% of total disbursements) 80% 76% 72%
Anti-Corruption Bureau $1,649,337 $1,834,831 $1,798,927
Central Contraceptives Procurement $2,785,000 $2,310,000 $4,250,003
Electoral Commission $29,670,282 $4,423,911 $478,829
Electricity Supply Corporation of Malawi $0 $0 $0
Lilongwe City Assembly $0 $18,779 $150,337
Malawi Defense Force $0 $14,628 $0
Malawi Investment Promotion Agency $403,602 $9,061 $0
Malawi Revenue Authority $0 $0 $0
Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security $39,279,457 $64,027,586 $36,488,858
Ministry of Economic Planning and Development $7,742,228 $14,822,930 $11,352,201
Ministry of Education, Science and Technology $66,836,954 $87,793,761 $125,688,967
Ministry of Energy and Mines $2,713,371 $3,950,281 $3,631,356
Ministry of Finance $192,481,593 $228,486,079 $124,385,512
Ministry of Health $131,468,709 $88,223,426 $135,781,462
Ministry of Home Affairs and Internal Security $285,509 $569,080 $502,035
Ministry of Industry and Trade $4,155,357 $10,652,402 $80,807,180
Ministry of Information and Civic Education $0 $1,514,014 $4,701,436
Ministry of Irrigation and Water Development $26,531,006 $48,011,063 $67,758,909
Ministry of Justice $2,761,727 $2,126,883 $4,273,109
Ministry of Labour $0 $0 $0
Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources $5,668,643 $3,443,753 $6,997,750
Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development
$22,351,878 $17,451,191 $11,572,488
Ministry of Tourism, Wildlife and Culture $168,826 $433,651 $407,069
Ministry of Woman and Child Development $10,241,151 $4,069,035 $5,321,760
Ministry of Youth Development and Sports $125,213 $0 $73,493
Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Infrastructure
$6,463,255 $34,209,304 $86,680,492
NATIONAL ASSEMBLY $2,856,062 $1,991,097 $12,829
National Audit Office $81,459 $2,586,620 $1,116,926
National Statistics Office $1,116,247 $2,948,503 $2,269,956
Nutrition, HIV and AIDS and National AIDS Commission
$89,515,382 $36,882,222 $54,333,732
Office of the Ombudsman $86,880 $157 $0
Office of the President and Cabinet $9,404,761 $56,867,052 $6,526,181
Police $21,054 $0 $0
Poverty and Disaster Management Affairs $465,885 $379,995 $739,849
Prisons Service $21,054 $0 $0
Page | 39
Privatization Commission $0 $0 $0
Roads Authority $16,061,247 $34,164,958 $30,850,750
NGOs and other Implementing Partners (% of total disbursements) 20% 24% 28%
Academy for Education Development $210,585 $1,690,046 $4,140,730
Banja La Mtsogolo $498,205 $169,056 $1,249,713
Baobab Health Trust $0 $800,000 $2,325,000
Bunda College of Agriculture $843,916 $3,281,228 $762,168
CARE $0 $0 $0
CONGOMA $239,187 $33,317 $0
CUMO MICRO FINANCE LTD $0 $0 $66,541
Canada $1,143,785 $1,064,077 $440,204
Catholic Relief Services - USCC $7,730,049 $17,681,508 $14,890,590
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention $0 $771,089 $843,169
Centre for Legal Assistance $0 $265,384 $93,453
Centre for Multiparty Democracy $0 $15,503 $152,618
Centre for Human Rights and Rehabilitation $0 $0 $428,941
Chemonics International $2,144,436 $711,329 $13,606
Christian Health Association of Malawi (CHAM) $0 $720,000 $2,216,386
College of Medicine $0 $4,303,665 $9,312,197
Concern Ireland $0 $0 $0
Concern Universal $1,147,188 $2,465,342 $1,773,267
Concern-UK $347,932 $302,814 $401,925
Creative Associates International Inc. $0 $1,106,312 $4,386,200
Danish Church Aid $0 $0 $348,750
Department for International Development $414,048 $2,534,947 $7,033,714
Development Alternatives Incorporated $1,399,103 $599,181 $0
Directorate of Public Procurement $500,043 $824,555 $2,849,093
EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC $2,161,535 $1,746,721 $3,400,914
ELIZABETH GLASER PEDEATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION
$656,353 $721,490 $0
European Commission $63,460 $0 $0
FINANCIAL SERVICES VOLUNTEER CORPS (FSVC)
$189,999 $35,000 $100,000
Family Planning Association of Malawi (FPAM) $0 $0 $146,803
Flemish International Cooperation Agency $330,120 $0 $0
Food and Agriculture Organisation $1,181,085 $3,630,775 $2,167,759
Friends of Aids Support Trust (FAST) $0 $13,586 $106,881
German GIZ (Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit)
$0 $0 $0
Health Policy Initiative $0 $124,689 $0
Heifer Project International $0 $91,948 $313,866
Page | 40
Howard University $0 $1,100,000 $3,037,583
Human Rights Commission $498,875 $452,611 $163,924
ICRAF $1,307,203 $1,928,033 $2,597,071
INTRAHEALTH INTERNATIONAL $101,238 $3,073,217 $705,654
International Training and Education Center for Health (I-TECH)
$0 $1,750,000 $2,750,000
Ireland $975,291 $904,582 $171,772
JHPIEGO CORPORATION $0 $1,279,770 $3,264,351
JOHN SNOW, INC. $8,361,910 $16,538,281 $14,101,397
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY $15,512 $3,739,733 $5,950,259
Japan International Cooperation Agency $11,182,207 $9,379,601 $11,675,017
LAND O'LAKES, INC. $1,327,861 $1,039,158 $1,288,046
Law Commission $0 $34,780 $17,640
Leadership for Environment and Development (LEAD)
$0 $1,040,763 $123,766
Lighthouse Trust $0 $97,000 $900,000
MANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH $3,500,632 $7,348,530 $6,068,154
Malawi AIDS Counseling & Resource Organisation(MACRO)
$0 $1,750,000 $730,000
Malawi Blood Transfusion Service $0 $100,000 $1,140,000
MHRRC $1,053,241 $308,949 $614,565
Malawi Girl Guides Association (MAGGA) $0 $0 $130,941
Mulanje Mountain Conservation Trust $422,066 $946,201 $1,031,771
NGO Gender Coordination Network $1,334,563 $693,842 $499,089
NASFAM $315,516 $107,110 $0
Norwegian Church Aid $0 $0 $1,675,539
Nutrition, HIV and AIDS and National AIDS Commission
$89,515,382 $36,882,222 $54,333,732
Opportunity Bank of Malawi $51,842 $48,927 $27,158
OXFAM $0 $113,910 $109,333
PEACE COPRS $0 $135,884 $85,000
PMI COMMODITIES $0 $200,000 $0
POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL (PSI)
$1,008,175 $7,607,739 $10,260,331
PRIVATE AGENCIES COLLABORATING TOGETHER (PACT)
$4,609,858 $6,618,029 $5,540,775
PROJECT HOPE $630,825 $58,880 $0
Partners In Hope $0 $320,879 $1,645,667
RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE $3,079,880 $1,001,236 $2,469,723
Red Cross $188,532 $190,344 $146,395
Save the Children $384,259 $198,953 $806,313
Society of Accountants in Malawi $0 $0 $0
Swedish Cooperative Centre $1,039,224 $1,307,685 $1,485,246
Total Land Care $0 $436,699 $2,641,947
Page | 41
UNFPA $0 $0 $0
United Nations Children's Fund $6,103,718 $2,575,300 $1,529,758
United Nations Development Programme $6,216,224 $1,029,953 $700,969
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation
$0 $0 $0
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees $943,687 $20,996 $1,230,152
United Nations Programme on HIV and AIDS $330,120 $75,864 $38,304
United States Agency for International Development
$6,483,863 $7,221,584 $6,500,625
WORLD LEARNING INC $295,718 $651,527 $438,566
WORLD RELIEF GRANT $24,248 $1,364,443 $2,970,000
Water Aid $105,843 $426,429 $481,259
World Bank $510,132 $526,048 $2,250,000
World Food Programme $0 $21,590,186 $0
World Health Organization $2,230,599 $4,650,919 $2,119,148
Implementing Partner Unallocated $66,886,784 $34,888,698 $119,568,865
*Note that data on aid channeled through NGOs and CSOs is not complete since a good proportion of such aid is
not reported to MoFDP as such it is not captured in AMP and aid reports, especially, aid from NGO to NGO. Going forward, the Government will intensify efforts of capturing aid information for NGO support to enhance aid transparency and accountability for results.
Page | 42
Project Implementing Units by Donor (2010/11FY)
Aid Disbursement by Type (2010/11FY)
Page | 43
Aid Predictability by Modality by Donor (2010/11FY)*
Aid Modality Donor
Currency Proj.
2010/11FY Actual
2010/11FY %
Disbursed
GENERAL BUDGET SUPPORT
AfDB UA/SDR 3,464,000 3,361,293 97%
DfID Sterling 19,000,000 19,000,000 100%
EU Euros 49,500,000 42,625,000 86%
PRBS III + V-Flex Euros 49,500,000 42,625,000 86%
Food Facility Euros 0 0
GDC Euros 10,000,000 2,500,000 25%
Norway Kroner 70,000,000 35,000,000 50%
World Bank USD 40,000,000 149,403 0%
444%
FOOD INPUT SUBSIDY PROGRAM (FISP) GRANTS - Discrete
Ireland Euro 0 1,850,000
EU Euro 0 1,109,680
DfID Pound 180,000 386,381 215%
FARM INPUT SUBSIDY PROGRAM (FISP) GRANTS - Pooled
DfID Sterling 4,600,000 5,892,582 128%
Ireland Euro 1,500,000 1,500,000 100%
EU 12,750,000 11,280,261 88% Of which Foreign Exchange
Facility Euro 8,750,000 8,750,000
100%
Of which Seed Subsidy Grants Euro 4,000,000 2,530,261 63%
Norway Kroner 23,000,000 20,000,000 87%
567%
Health SWAp GRANTS - Discrete
AfDB SDR 1,898,266 3,098,567 163%
DfID Sterling 2,900,226 307,898 11%
UNICEF USD 300,000 0 0%
Global Fund USD 0 16,083,750
HEALTH SWAp GRANTS - Pooled
DfID Sterling 15,591,000 15,080,153 97%
Global Fund USD 49,682,708 47,339,202 95%
GDC Euros 5,000,000 0 0%
Norway Kroner 110,000,000 40,000,000 36%
UNICEF USD 0 300,000
GAVI USD 0 0
FICA Euro 2,000,000 965,000 48%
Page | 44
UNFPA USD 300,000 0 0%
277%
EDUCATION SWAp GRANTS - Discrete
DfID Sterling 3,400,000 537,180 16%
GDC Euro 1,980,000 0 0%
AfDB
2,500,000 4,836,807 193%
EDUCATION SWAp GRANTS - Pooled
DfID Sterling 14,000,000 11,666,667 83%
GDC Euro 5,500,000 5,500,000 100%
UNICEF USD 250,000 648,341 259%
World Bank - NESP USD 6,000,000 5,090,600 85%
World Bank - Fast Track Initiative USD 15,000,000 15,090,000 101%
628%
NAC GRANTS
DfID Sterling 4,200,000 4,200,000 100%
Global Fund USD 61,612,610 46,227,226 75%
World Bank USD 8,225,318 0 0%
Norway Kroner 0 0
UNAIDS USD 0 38,441 175%
Project Support* USD 630,278,759 678,309,376 107%
of which Project Grants USD 384,340,312 458,381,759 119%
of which Project Loans USD 245,938,447 219,927,617 89%
*These figures comprise both on and off-budget figures. Budget support and pool funds are all on-
budget support while the discrete and project funds are mixed.
Page | 45
General Budget Support Predictability by Development Partner (2010/11FY)
Farm Input Subsidy Program Pool Support Predictability by Development Partner (2010/11FY)
Page | 46
Health SSWAp Pool Predictability by Development Partner (2010/11FY)
Aid Predictability for Education SWAp Pool by Development Partner (2010/11FY)
Page | 47
Aid Fragmentation by Development Partner (2010/11FY)
DONOR AGENCY
Total Disbursement 2010/11FY
Number of Projects
Number of Sectors
Average Project Size
Average Disbursement by Sector
USAID $124,503,992 53 9 $2,349,132 $13,833,777
World Bank $123,904,806 19 11 $6,521,306 $11,264,073
DfID $110,079,528 39 10 $2,822,552 $11,007,953
Global Fund $109,650,178 5 1 $21,930,036 $109,650,178
EU $96,806,731 32 9 $3,025,210 $10,756,303
Norway $40,565,123 34 8 $1,193,092 $5,070,640
Japan $30,973,912 16 8 $1,935,869 $3,871,739
AfDB $29,197,764 11 7 $2,654,342 $4,171,109
CDC $24,668,969 11 1 $2,242,634 $24,668,969
GDC $22,556,557 17 5 $1,326,856 $4,511,311
Arab Donors $18,769,722 5 2 $3,753,944 $9,384,861
Ireland $15,316,506 35 8 $437,614 $1,914,563
FICA $5,773,121 16 2 $360,820 $2,886,561
IFAD $4,432,371 3 2 $1,477,457 $2,216,186
Canada $3,803,546 5 4 $760,709 $950,886
ICEIDA $1,815,113 4 3 $453,778 $605,038
AusAID $1,500,000 1 1 $1,500,000 $1,500,000
ONE UN $88,572,013 135 16 $656,089 $5,535,751
UNFPA $3,254,130 23 3 $141,484 $1,084,710
UNICEF $34,613,753 12 6 $2,884,479 $5,768,959
WFP $22,168,270 3 2 $7,389,423 $11,084,135
UNDP $20,083,379 35 11 $573,811 $1,825,762
FAO $3,518,605 25 3 $140,744 $1,172,868
WHO $2,749,299 9 1 $305,478 $2,749,299
UNHCR $819,072 5 2 $163,814 $409,536
UNAIDS $599,231 13 2 $46,095 $299,616
UNIDO $511,732 3 2 $170,577 $255,866
UNESCO $254,542 7 2 $36,363 $127,271
People's Republic of China*
$96,151,399 3 3 $32,050,466 $32,050,466
Republic of India* $73,357,388 3 3 $24,452,463 $24,452,463
TOTAL $1,022,398,739 442 16 $2,313,119 $63,899,921
Page | 48
Aid Fragmentation by Sector (2010/11FY)
Total Disbursement 2010/11FY
Number of Projects
Number of Donors
Average Disbursement per Project
Average Disbursement per Donor
Agriculture $79,729,345 82 12 $972,309 $6,644,112
Democratic Governance $18,103,206 41 10 $441,542 $1,810,321
Economic Governance $126,611,618 34 11 $3,723,871 $11,510,147
Education $167,676,973 41 12 $4,089,682 $13,973,081
Energy and Mining $4,819,394 6 4 $803,232 $1,204,849
Environment, Lands and Natural Resources $26,121,112 13 6 $2,009,316 $4,353,519
Gender, Youth Development and Sports $8,954,127 24 8 $373,089 $1,119,266
Health $298,199,442 115 21 $2,593,039 $14,199,973
Information Technology $823,593 1 1 $823,593 $823,593
Integrated Rural Development $11,785,985 13 9 $906,614 $1,309,554
Public Administration $9,242,094 2 2 $4,621,047 $4,621,047
Roads, Public Works and Transport $99,245,198 17 8 $5,837,953 $12,405,650
Tourism, Wildlife and Culture $33,549,073 8 3 $4,193,634 $11,183,024
Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development $28,111,982 11 7 $2,555,635 $4,015,997
Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management $19,984,024 22 7 $908,365 $2,854,861
Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $89,304,971 17 10 $5,253,234 $8,930,497
TOTAL $1,022,398,739 446 29 $2,292,374 $35,255,129
Page | 49
Illustrative Maps of location of aid projects from the pilot Geocoding
Initiative
Page | 50
Page | 51
Page | 52
Note: More detailed maps with exact locations of aid projects are available at:
http://www.strausscenter.org/ccaps/mappingtool
Page | 53
SECTOR ANALYSIS
Page | 54
MGDS THEME 1: SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH
Agriculture
Integrated Rural Development
Environment, Lands and Natural Resources
Tourism, Wildlife and Culture
Water, Sanitation and Irrigation
Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development
Page | 55
Agriculture (2010/11FY)
Agriculture Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
Agriculture $67,446,443 $115,853,927 $79,729,345
AfDB $9,249,347 $28,063,311 $2,918,909
DfID $7,516,705 $6,985,409 $9,830,797
Of which Farm Input Subsidy Program - Discrete $298,928 $429,943 $616,478
Of which Farm Input Subsidy Program - Pooled $7,217,777 $6,555,466 $9,214,319
EU $13,962,277 $37,077,045 $18,557,585
Of which Budget Support (food facility) $0 $21,590,186 $0
Farm Input Subsidy Program - Discrete $7,226,583 $144,148 $1,579,297
Farm Input Subsidy Program - Pooled $0 $11,881,391 $15,537,165
FICA $2,733,611 $2,748,535 $4,372,134
FAO $4,146,157 $3,743,823 $3,177,835
ICEIDA $464,961 $132,251 $0
IFAD $1,677,798 $3,642,675 $3,043,572
Ireland $5,060,746 $11,252,471 $5,157,012
Of which Farm Input Subsidy Program - Discrete $3,099,962 $6,481,137 $2,459,066
Of which Farm Input Subsidy Program - Pooled $1,960,784 $4,771,334 $2,081,926
Japan $534,299 $941,475 $0
Norway $9,625,886 $7,519,419 $11, 341,557
Of which Farm Input Subsidy Program - Pooled $2,110,328 $0 $3,338,066
UNDP $954,363 $460,350 $686,379
UNIDO $936,289 $238,069 $487,532
USAID $10,584,004 $4,540,772 $10,605,565
World Bank $0 $8,508,322 $9,550,468
Page | 56
Integrated Rural Development (2010/11FY)
Integrated Rural Development Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
Integrated Rural Development
$21,131,276 $16,914,477 $11,785,985
AfDB $0 $437,353 $609,030
EU $12,189,846 $5,869,073 $1,300,860
FAO $0 $46,390 $287,071
GDC $3,777,341 $2,048,930 $3,376,843
IFAD $2,879,949 $4,599,284 $1,388,799
Ireland $0 $0 $1,727,364
Japan $537,815 $1,438,649 $802,914
UNDP $1,746,326 $2,375,376 $1,732,899
USAID $0 $99,422 $560,204
Page | 57
Environment, Lands and Natural Resources (2010/11FY)
Environment, Lands and Natual Resources Summary Table (2008/09-2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
Environment, Lands and Natural Resources $17,841,528 $19,577,513 $26,121,112
EU $1,803,264 $254,959 $1,756,098
Ireland $0 $0 $19,989
Japan $8,736,673 $13,130,698 $13,478,380
Norway $2,077,681 $3,574,695 $5,466,035
UNDP $128,810 $339,486 $611,131
UNESCO $0 $1,100 $0
USAID $1,399,103 $599,181 $0
World Bank $3,695,997 $1,677,394 $4,789,479
Page | 58
Tourism, Wildlife and Culture (2010/11FY)
Tourism, Wildlife and Culture Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
Tourism, Wildlife and Culture $705,789 $30,699,016 $33,549,073
Norway $535,449 $699,016 $634,233
People's Republic of China $0 $30,000,000 $32,891,650
UNESCO $0 $0 $23,191
USAID $170,340 $0 $0
Norway 2 %
People's Republic of
China 98 %
UNESCO < 1 %
Page | 59
Water, Sanitation and Irrigation (2010/11FY)
Water, Sanitation and Irrigation Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $27,364,286 $70,429,975 $89,304,971
AfDB $12,187,524 $7,561,932 $8,053,364
BADEA $0 $3,125,898 $6,113,005
AusAID $0 $0 $1,500,000
Canada $204,127 $0 $0
DfID $453,775 $729,243 $1,223,601
EU $0 $2,850,885 $0
FICA $0 $714,726 $0
GDC $64,062 $0 $0
ICEIDA $929,099 $899,328 $539,073
Japan $3,247,310 $2,685,034 $798,136
OPEC Fund $0 $1,362,896 $1,690,461
Republic of India $0 $0 $30,000,000
UNICEF $0 $1,989,927 $6,806,495
USAID $393,824 $22,352,975 $18,632,000
World Bank $9,884,564 $26,157,133 $13,948,836
Page | 60
Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development (2010/11FY)
DfID<1%
EU<1%
Republic of India 77%
UNDP1%
UNIDO<1%
USAID2%
World Bank20%
Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development $7,635,528 $5,872,146 $28,111,982
DfID $675,787 $252,827 $10,501
EU $209,178 $0 $1,571
Republic of India $0 $0 $21,678,694
UNDP $855,972 $543,959 $455,066
UNIDO $498,960 $190,241 $24,200
USAID $2,226,623 $846,887 $545,110
World Bank $3,169,008 $4,038,232 $5,396,840
Page | 61
MGDS THEME 2 – SOCIAL PROTECTION AND DISASTER RISK
MANAGEMENT
Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management
Page | 62
Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management (2010/11FY)
Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management $31,484,842 $18,128,441 $19,984,024
DfID $439,031 $1,421,752 $2,843,905
FAO $29,841 $0 $0
Ireland $1,200,935 $1,772,325 $3,357,365
Japan $0 $43,401 $0
Norway $0 $0 $1,675,539
UNICEF $0 $20,031 $6,815
UNDP $1,474,747 $1,494,144 $1,476,229
USAID $319,440 $246,678 $13,606
World Bank $0 $4,073,267 $0
WFP $28,020,849 $9,056,843 $10,610,565
Page | 63
MGDS THEME 3 –SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
Health
Education
Gender, Youth Development and Sports
Page | 64
Health (2010/11FY)
Page | 65
Health Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
HEALTH $254,019,865 $191,780,695 $298,199,442
AfDB $6,298,118 $3,422,500 $4,819,244
Of which Health SWAp - Discrete $6,298,118 $3,422,500 $4,819,244
Canada $49,411 $2,929,399 $1,314,302
Of which Sector Support - NAC $49,411 $0 $0
CDC $4,172,202 $11,365,622 $24,668,969
DfID $29,691,477 $28,919,354 $36,443,467
Of which Health SWAp - Discrete $476,409 $534,857 $492,404
Of which Health SWAp - Pooled $20,706,091 $19,007,280 $24,083,548
Of which Sector Support - NAC $7,359,750 $6,797,216 $6,536,628
EU $6,441,060 $771,168 $638,703
FICA $330,120 $2,748,893 $1,400,987
Of which Health SWAp - Pooled $0 $2,748,893 $1,400,987
FAO $13,732 $148,175 $53,699
GDC $8,869,073 $6,091,163 $2,578,222
Of which Health SWAp - Pooled $6,692,816 $3,521,623 $0
Global Fund $111,770,649 $29,428,797 $109,650,178
Of which Health SWAp - Discrete $0 $0 $16,083,750
Of which Health SWAp - Pooled $33,869,706 $3,721,540 $47,339,202
Of which Sector Support - NAC $77,900,943 $25,707,257 $46,227,226
ICEIDA $2,011,624 $861,896 $816,801
Ireland $29,985 $0 $2,890,442
Japan $1,534,314 $1,424,425 $497,880
Norway $23,135,630 $27,239,646 $8,869,352
Of which Health SWAp - Pooled $14,119,628 $19,064,085 $6,604,964
Of which Sector Support - NAC $2,326,627 $2,356,749 $0
UNFPA $34,568 $278,578 $1,464,370
UNICEF $0 $3,481,715 $10,480,461
Health SWAp - Pooled $0 $0 $300,000
UNDP $2,276,453 $2,516,743 $2,059,349
UNHCR $166,814 $186,182 $170,642
UNAIDS $333,689 $302,247 $483,825
Of which Sector Support - NAC $295,566 $60,000 $38,441
USAID $50,901,086 $64,718,467 $74,563,610
World Bank $3,689,202 $0 $11,585,639
Of which Health SWAp - Pooled $3,000,000 $0 $0
Of which Sector Support - NAC $689,202 $0 $0
WHO $2,270,658 $4,945,726 $2,749,299
Page | 66
Education (2010/11FY)
Education Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
Education $73,383,459 $101,905,529 $167,676,973
AfDB $1,707,457 $10,745,544 $7,511,129
Of which Education SWAp - Discrete $1,707,457 $10,745,544 $7,511,129
Canada $7,752,387 $3,730,901 $2,181,898
DfID $20,254,365 $20,800,887 $20,659,846
Of which Education SWAp - Discrete $0 $231,439 $862,522
Of which Education SWAp - Pooled $0 $29,330 $18,052,963
EU $124,230 $0 $0
GDC $5,706,763 $3,447,245 $11,927,240
Of which Education SWAp - Pooled $0 $0 $7,343,337
ICEIDA $2,098,270 $361,010 $459,239
Ireland $431,607 $372,760 $0
Japan $2,307,681 $3,931,821 $4,905,980
People's Republic of China $0 $30,000,000 $39,959,749
UNICEF $0 $4,218,321 $7,614,965
Education SWAp - Pooled $0 $0 $648,341
UNESCO $0 $48,773 $231,351
USAID $5,778,640 $6,015,634 $19,327,512
World Bank $10,090,656 $13,149,594 $41,473,218
Of which Education SWAp - Pooled $0 $0 $20,180,600
WFP $17,261,317 $5,205,402 $11,557,705
Page | 67
Gender, Youth Development and Sports (2010/11FY)
Gender, Youth Development and Sports Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
Gender, Youth Development and Sports $10,887,100 $5,345,455 $8,954,127
AfDB $5,145,730 $241,313 $0
Canada $187,317 $2,892 $0
Ireland $0 $0 $27,992
Norway $3,282,414 $1,382,085 $2,023,117
UNFPA $0 $0 $534,085
UNICEF $0 $1,769,905 $4,475,094
UNDP $2,271,639 $1,749,148 $1,089,986
UNAIDS $0 $186,526 $115,406
USAID $0 $13,586 $173,422
World Bank $0 $0 $515,025
Page | 68
MGDS THEME 4 – INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
Roads, Public Works and Transport Administration
Information Technology
Energy and Mining
Page | 69
Roads, Public Works and Transport (2010/11FY)
Roads, Public Works and Transport Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
Roads, Public Works and Transport $44,381338 $61,242,346 $99,245,198
AfDB $0 $0 $125,906
BADEA $656,434 $2,924,035 $8,470,385
DfID $204,744 $151,774 $456,418
EU $35,732,177 $11,627,472 $9,817,137
Japan $3,731,963 $636,264 $4,906,578
Kuwait Fund $478,906 $0 $0
OPEC Fund $143,000 $1,323,267 $2,495,871
People's Republic of China $0 $23,300,000 $23,300,000
Republic of India $65,028 $5,591,312 $21,678,694
World Bank $3,369,087 $15,688,222 $27,994,209
Page | 70
Energy and Mining (2010/11FY)
DfID2%
EU9%
Japan 70%
UNDP19%
Energy and Mining Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
Energy and Mining $1,744,255 $3,624,115 $4,819,394
DfID $0 $0 $83,513
EU $0 $0 $422,300
Japan $1,210,478 $3,184,129 $3,377,383
UNDP $487,407 $404,986 $936,198
UNIDO $46,370 $35,000 $0
Page | 71
Information Technology (2010/11FY)
World Bank100%
Information Technology Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
Information Technology $888,386 $9,633,484 $823,593
UNDP $888,386 $279,789 $0
World Bank $0 $9,353,695 $823,593
Page | 72
MGDS THEME 5 – IMPROVED GOVERNANCE
Democratic Governance
Economic Governance
Public Administration
Page | 73
Democratic Governance (2010/11FY)
Democratic Governance Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
Democratic Governance $64,497,758 $74,168,590 $18,103,206
Canada $1,283,722 $892,328 $307,346
DfID $9,853,144 $5,692,951 $6,168,631
EU $19,066,465 $4,668,558 $3,219,927
GDC $1,554,315 $1,153,143 $139,655
Ireland $2,600,094 $1,603,446 $1,978,820
Norway $5,123,649 $1,924,433 $2,074,861
People's Republic of China $0 $50,000,000 $0
UNDP $21,903,536 $7,149,812 $3,482,572
UNHCR $687,430 $759,424 $648,430
USAID $2,425,402 $324,495 $82,963
Page | 74
Economic Governance (2010/11FY)
Economic Governance Summary Table (20108/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
Economic Governance $181,823,712 $224,472,799 $126,611,619
AfDB $37,817,562 $12,012,879 $5,160,183
Of which Budget Support $37,817,562 $12,012,879 $5,160,183
Canada $628,666 $49,386 $0
DfID $41,283,429 $31,596,824 $32,358,849
Of which Budget Support $40,468,766 $29,835,885 $29,644,156
EU $49,288,542 $90,975,927 $61,092,550
Of which Budget Support $45,317,659 $88,462,567 $56,372,458
GDC $1,582,608 $14,519,859 $4,534,596
Of which Budget Support $0 $13,081,661 $3,303,306
Ireland $164,918 $288,903 $66,066
Japan $674,160 $2,462,573 $2,206,660
Norway $14,793,466 $15,483,618 $8,476,687
Of which Budget Support $10,879,608 $11,059,439 $5,779,344
UNFPA $0 $0 $1,255,675
UNICEF $0 $1,658,682 $5,229,923
UNDP $2,609,441 $2,896,719 $6,081,026
World Bank $32,980,921 $52,527,429 $149,403
Of which Budget Support $30,000,000 $52,527,429 $149,403
Page | 75
Public Administration 2010/11FY
Ireland1%
UNDP16%
World Bank83%
Public Administration Summary Table (2008/09FY - 2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
Public Administration $2,064,679 $5,512,247 $9,242,094
Canada $754,345 $0 $0
Ireland $0 $0 $91,455
UNDP $1,310,334 $1,615,470 $1,472,544
World Bank $0 $3,896,777 $7,678,095
Page | 76
DONOR ANALYSIS
Page | 77
DONOR ANALYSIS –CABS DONORS
African Development Bank
European Union
Norway
Department for International Development, UK (DfID)
World Bank
German Development Cooperation (GDC)
Page | 78
African Development Bank (2010/11FY)
AfDB – Summary Table (2008/09Fy -2010/11FY, USD) 2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
AfDB $72,405,737 $62,484,831 $29,197,764
Agriculture $9,249,347 $28,063,311 $2,918,909
Economic Governance $37,817,562 $12,012,879 $5,160,183
Of which Budget Support $37,817,562 $12,012,879 $5,160,183
Education $1,707,457 $10,745,544 $7,511,129
Of which Education SWAp - Discrete $1,707,457 $10,745,544 $7,511,129
Gender, Youth Development and Sports $5,145,730 $241,313 $0
HEALTH $6,298,118 $3,422,500 $4,819,244
Of which Health SWAp - Discrete $6,298,118 $3,422,500 $4,819,244
Integrated Rural Development $0 $437,353 $609,030
Roads, Public Works and Transport $0 $0 $125,906
Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $12,187,524 $7,561,932 $8,053,364
Page | 79
European Union (2010/11FY)
EU – Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
EU $138,817,040 $154,205,498 $96,806,731
Agriculture $13,962,277 $37,077,045 $18,557,585
Of which Budget Support $0 $21,590,186 $0
Farm Input Subsidy Program - Discrete $7,226,583 $144,148 $1,579,297
Farm Input Subsidy Program - Pooled $0 $11,881,391 $15,537,165
Democratic Governance $19,066,465 $4,668,558 $3,219,927
Economic Governance $49,288,542 $91,086,338 $61,092,550
Budget Support $45,317,659 $88,462,567 $56,372,458
Education $124,230 $0 $0
Energy and Mining $0 $0 $422,300
Environment, Lands and Natural Resources $1,803,264 $254,959 $1,756,098
HEALTH $6,441,060 $771,168 $638,703
Integrated Rural Development $12,189,846 $5,869,073 $1,300,860
Roads, Public Works and Transport $35,732,177 $11,627,472 $9,817,137
Road Sector-Pooled $0 $0 $0
Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development $209,178 $0 $1,571
Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $0 $2,850,885 $0
Page | 80
Norway (2010/11FY)
Norway – Summary Table (2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
Norway $58,574,174 $57,822,913 $40,565,123
Agriculture $9,625,886 $7,519,419 $11,342,557
Of which Farm Input Subsidy Program - Pooled $2,110,328 $0 $3,338,066
Democratic Governance $5,123,649 $1,924,433 $2,074,861
Economic Governance $14,793,466 $15,483,618 $8,476,687
Of which Budget Support $10,879,608 $11,059,439 $5,779,344
Education $0 $0 $0
Environment, Lands and Natural Resources $2,077,681 $3,574,695 $5,466,035
Gender, Youth Development and Sports $3,282,414 $1,382,085 $2,023,117
HEALTH $23,135,630 $27,239,646 $8,869,352
Of which Health SWAp - Pooled $14,119,628 $19,064,085 $6,604,964
Of which Sector Support - NAC $2,326,627 $2,356,749 $0
Tourism, Wildlife and Culture $535,449 $699,016 $634,233
Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management $0 $0 $1,675,539
Page | 81
Department for International Development (2010/11FY)
Agriculture 9%
Democratic Governance
6%
Economic Governance
29%
Education 19%
Energy and Mining <1%
HEALTH 33%
Roads, Public Works and Transport
<1%
Trade, Industry and
Private Sector Development
<1%
Vulnerability, Disaster and
Risk Management
3%
Water,Sanitation and
Irrigation 1%
DfID – Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)
2008/90FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
DfID $110,372,455 $96,551,021 $110,079,528
Agriculture $7,516,705 $6,985,409 $9,830,797
Of which Farm Input Subsidy Program - Discrete $298,928 $429,943 $616,478
Of which Farm Input Subsidy Program - Pooled $7,217,777 $6,555,466 $9,214,319
Democratic Governance $9,853,144 $5,692,951 $6,168,631
Economic Governance $41,283,429 $31,596,824 $32,358,849
Of which Budget Support $40,468,766 $29,835,885 $29,644,156
Education $20,254,365 $20,800,887 $20,659,846
Of which Education SWAp - Discrete $0 $231,439 $862,522
Of which Education SWAp - Pooled $0 $29,330 $18,052,963
Energy and Mining $0 $0 $83,513
HEALTH $29,691,477 $28,919,354 $36,443,467
Of which Health SWAp - Discrete $476,409 $534,857 $492,404
Of which Health SWAp - Pooled $20,706,091 $19,007,280 $24,083,548
Of which Sector Support - NAC $7,359,750 $6,797,216 $6,536,628
Roads, Public Works and Transport $204,744 $151,774 $456,418
Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development $675,787 $252,827 $10,501
Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management $439,031 $1,421,752 $2,843,905
Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $453,775 $729,243 $1,223,601
Page | 82
World Bank (2010/11FY)
World Bank – Summary Table (2008/09FY - 2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
World Bank $66,879,435 $139,070,065 $123,904,806
Agriculture $0 $8,508,322 $9,550,468
Economic Governance $32,980,921 $52,527,429 $149,403
Of which Budget Support $30,000,000 $52,527,429 $149,403
Education $10,090,656 $13,149,594 $41,473,218
Of which Education SWAp - Pooled $0 $0 $20,180,600
Energy and Mining $0 $0 $0
Environment, Lands and Natural Resources $3,695,997 $1,677,394 $4,789,479
Gender, Youth Development and Sports $0 $0 $515,025
Health $3,689,202 $0 $11,585,639
Of which Health SWAp - Pooled $3,000,000 $0 $0
Of which Sector Support - NAC $689,202 $0 $0
Information Technology $0 $9,353,695 $823,593
Public Administration $0 $3,896,777 $7,488,201
Roads, Public Works and Transport $3,369,087 $15,688,222 $27,994,209
Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development
$3,169,008 $4,038,232 $5,396,840
Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management $0 $4,073,267 $0
Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $9,884,564 $26,157,133 $13,948,836
Page | 83
German Development Cooperation (2010/11FY)
Democratic Governance
1%
Economic Governance
20%
Education 53%
HEALTH 11%
Integrated Rural
Development
15%
GDC – Summary Table (2008/09FY– 2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
GDC $21,554,162 $27,260,340 $22,556,557
Democratic Governance $1,554,315 $1,153,143 $139,655
Economic Governance $1,582,608 $14,519,859 $4,534,596
Of which Budget Support $0 $13,081,661 $3,303,306
Education $5,706,763 $3,447,245 $11,927,240
Of which Education SWAp - Pooled $0 $0 $7,343,337
HEALTH $8,869,073 $6,091,163 $2,578,222
Of which Health SWAp - Pooled $6,692,816 $3,521,623 $0
Integrated Rural Development $3,777,341 $2,048,930 $3,376,843
Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $64,062 $0 $0
Page | 84
DONOR ANALYSIS – DISCRETE DONORS
Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID)
Canada
Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Flemish International Cooperation Agency (FICA)
The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria
(Global Fund)
Iceland International Development Agency (ICEIDA)
International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)
Ireland
Japan
US Agency for International Development (USAID)
Page | 85
Australian Agency for International Development (2010/11FY)
Water, Sanitation
and Irrigation
100%
AusAID – Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
AusAID $0 $0 $1,500,000
Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $0 $0 $1,500,000
Page | 86
Canada (2010/11FY)
Democratic Governance
8%
Education 57%
HEALTH 35%
Canada – Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
Canada $10,859,976 $7,604,906 $3,803,546
Democratic Governance $1,283,722 $892,328 $307,346
Economic Governance $628,666 $49,386 $0
Education $7,752,387 $3,730,901 $2,181,898
Gender, Youth Development and Sports $187,317 $2,892 $0
HEALTH $49,411 $2,929,399 $1,314,302
Of which Sector Support - NAC $49,411 $0 $0
Public Administration $754,345 $0 $0
Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $204,127 $0 $0
Page | 87
Centre for Disease Control (2010/11FY)
Health 100%
CDC –Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
CDC $4,024,497 $11,365,622 $24,668,969
Health $4,024,497 $11,365,622 $24,668,969
Page | 88
Flemish International Cooperation Agency (2010/11FY)
Agriculture 61%
HEALTH 39%
FICA- Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
FICA $3,063,731 $6,212,154 $5,773,121
Agriculture $2,733,611 $2,748,535 $4,372,134
HEALTH $330,120 $2,748,893 $1,400,987
Of which Health SWAp - Pooled $0 $2,748,893 $1,400,987
Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $0 $714,726 $0
Page | 89
The Global Fund (2010/11FY)
Health 100%
Global Fund – Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
Global Fund (HIV/AIDS & Malaria) $111,770,649 $29,428,797 $109,650,178
HEALTH $111,770,649 $29,428,797 $109,650,178
Of which Health SWAp - Discrete $0 $0 $16,083,750
Of which Health SWAp - Pooled $33,869,706 $3,721,540 $47,339,202
Of which Sector Support - NAC $77,900,943 $25,707,257 $46,227,226
Page | 90
Iceland International Development Agency (2010/11FY)
Education 25%
HEALTH 45%
Water, Sanitation
and Irrigation 30%
ICEIDA – Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
ICEIDA $5,503,954 $2,254,485 $1,815,113
Agriculture $464,961 $132,251 $0
Education $2,098,270 $361,010 $459,239
Gender, Youth Development and Sports $0 $0 $0
HEALTH $2,011,624 $861,896 $816,801
Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $929,099 $899,328 $539,073
Page | 91
International Fund for Agricultural Development (2010/11FY)
Agriculture 69%
Integrated Rural
Development
31%
IFAD - Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
IFAD $4,557,746 $8,241,959 $4,432,371
Agriculture $1,677,798 $3,642,675 $3,043,572
Integrated Rural Development $2,879,949 $4,599,284 $1,388,799
Page | 92
Ireland (2010/11FY)
Agriculture 34%
Democratic Governance
13%
Economic Governance
<1%
Environment, Lands and
Natural Resources
<1%
Gender, Youth Development
and Sports <1%
HEALTH 19%
Integrated Rural
Development 11%
Public Administration
1%
Vulnerability, Disaster and
Risk Management
22%
Ireland - Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
Ireland $9,488,284 $15,289,905 $15,316,506
Agriculture $5,060,746 $11,252,471 $5,157,012
Of which Farm Input Subsidy Program - Discrete $3,099,962 $6,481,137 $2,459,066
Of which Farm Input Subsidy Program - Pooled $1,960,784 $4,771,334 $2,081,926
Democratic Governance $2,600,094 $1,603,446 $1,978,820
Economic Governance $164,918 $288,903 $66,066
Education $431,607 $372,760 $0
Environment, Lands and Natural Resources $0 $0 $19,989
Gender, Youth Development and Sports $0 $0 $27,992
HEALTH $29,985 $0 $2,890,442
Integrated Rural Development $0 $0 $1,727,364
Public Administration $0 $0 $91,455
Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management $1,200,935 $1,772,325 $3,357,365
Page | 93
Japan (2010/11FY
Economic Governance
7%
Education 16%
Energy and Mining 11%
Environment, Lands and
Natural Resources
43%
HEALTH 2%
Integrated Rural
Development
3%
Roads, Public Works and
Transport 16%
Water, Sanitation and
Irrigation 2%
Japan – Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
Japan $22,514,693 $29,878,468 $30,973,911
Agriculture $534,299 $941,475 $0
Economic Governance $674,160 $2,462,573 $2,206,660
Education $2,307,681 $3,931,821 $4,905,980
Energy and Mining $1,210,478 $3,184,129 $3,377,383
Environment, Lands and Natural Resources $8,736,673 $13,130,698 $13,478,380
HEALTH $1,534,314 $1,424,425 $497,880
Integrated Rural Development $537,815 $1,438,649 $802,914
Roads, Public Works and Transport $3,731,963 $636,264 $4,906,578
Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development $0 $0 $0
Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management $0 $43,401 $0
Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $3,247,310 $2,685,034 $798,136
Page | 94
United States Agency for International Development
(2010/11FY)
Agriculture 9%
Democratic Governance
<1%
Education 16%
Gender, Youth Development
and Sports <1%
HEALTH 60%
Integrated Rural
Development <1%
Trade, Industry and
Private Sector Development
<1%
Vulnerability, Disaster and
Risk Management
<1%
Water, Sanitation and
Irrigation 15%
USAID – Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
USAID $74,198,462 $99,758,097 $124,503,992
Agriculture $10,584,004 $4,540,772 $10,605,565
Democratic Governance $2,425,402 $324,495 $82,963
Education $5,778,640 $6,015,634 $19,327,512
Environment, Lands and Natural Resources $1,399,103 $599,181 $0
Gender, Youth Development and Sports $0 $13,586 $173,422
HEALTH $50,901,086 $64,718,467 $74,563,610
Integrated Rural Development $0 $99,422 $560,204
Tourism, Wildlife and Culture $170,340 $0 $0
Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development $2,226,623 $846,887 $545,110
Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management $319,440 $246,678 $13,606
Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $393,824 $22,352,975 $18,632,000
Page | 95
DONOR ANALYSIS – UNITED NATIONS AGENCIES
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)
United Nations Educational, Science and Cultural Organization
(UNESCO)
United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO)
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS)
United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)
United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA)
World Food Organization (WFP)
World Health Organization (WHO)
Page | 96
Food and Agriculture Organization (2010/11FY)
Agriculture 90%
HEALTH 2%
Integrated Rural
Development 8%
FAO – Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
FAO $4,189,730 $3,938,388 $3,518,605
Agriculture $4,146,157 $3,743,823 $3,177,835
HEALTH $13,732 $148,175 $53,699
Integrated Rural Development $0 $46,390 $287,071
Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management $29,841 $0 $0
Page | 97
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (2010/11FY)
Democratic Governance
79%
HEALTH 21%
UNHCR – Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
UNHCR $854,244 $945,606 $819,072
Democratic Governance $687,430 $759,424 $648,430
HEALTH $166,814 $186,182 $170,642
Page | 98
United Nations Educational, Science and Cultural Organization
(2010/11FY)
Education 91%
Tourism, Wildlife and
Culture 9%
UNESCO – Summary Table (2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
UNESCO $0 $49,873 $254,542
Education $0 $48,773 $231,351
Environment, Lands and Natural Resources $0 $1,100 $0
Information Technology $0 $0 $0
Tourism, Wildlife and Culture $0 $0 $23,191
Page | 99
United Nations Industrial Development Organization
(2010/11FY)
Agriculture 95%
Trade, Industry and Private
Sector Development
5%
UNIDO – Summary Table (2008/09FY -20101/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
UNIDO $1,481,619 $463,310 $511,732
Agriculture $936,289 $238,069 $487,532
Economic Governance $0 $0 $0
Energy and Mining $46,370 $35,000 $0
Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development $498,960 $190,241 $24,200
Page | 100
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (2010/11FY)
Gender, Youth Development
and Sports19%
HEALTH 81%
UNAIDS – Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
UNAIDS $333,689 $488,773 $599,231
Agriculture $0 $0 $0
Gender, Youth Development and Sports $0 $186,526 $115,406
HEALTH $333,689 $302,247 $483,825
Of which Sector Support - NAC $295,566 $60,000 $38,441
Page | 101
United Nations Development Programme (2010/11FY)
Agriculture 4%
Democratic Governance
17%
Economic Governance
30%Energy and Mining
5%Environment, Lands and
Natural Resources
3%
Gender, Youth Development
and Sports 6%
HEALTH 10%
Integrated Rural
Development
9%
Public Administration
7%
Trade, Industry and Private
Sector Development
2%
Vulnerability, Disaster and
Risk Management
7%
UNDP - Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
UNDP $36,907,414 $21,825,982 $20,083,379
Agriculture $954,363 $460,350 $686,379
Democratic Governance $21,903,536 $7,149,812 $3,482,572
Economic Governance $2,609,441 $2,896,719 $6,081,026
Energy and Mining $487,407 $404,986 $936,198
Environment, Lands and Natural Resources $128,810 $339,486 $611,131
Gender, Youth Development and Sports $2,271,639 $1,749,148 $1,089,986
HEALTH $2,276,453 $2,516,743 $2,059,349
Information Technology $888,386 $279,789 $0
Integrated Rural Development $1,746,326 $2,375,376 $1,732,899
Public Administration $1,310,334 $1,615,470 $1,472,544
Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development $855,972 $543,959 $455,066
Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management $1,474,747 $1,494,144 $1,476,229
Page | 102
United Nations Children’s Fund (2010/11FY)
Economic Governance
15%
Education 22%
Gender, Youth Development
and Sports 13%
HEALTH 30%
Vulnerability, Disaster and
Risk Management
<1%
Water, Sanitation and
Irrigation 20%
UNICEF – Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
UNICEF $0 $13,138,581 $34,613,753
Economic Governance $0 $1,658,682 $5,229,923
Education $0 $4,218,321 $7,614,965
Education SWAp - Pooled $0 $0 $648,341
Gender, Youth Development and Sports $0 $1,769,905 $4,475,094
HEALTH $0 $3,481,715 $10,480,461
Health SWAp - Pooled $0 $0 $300,000
Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management $0 $20,031 $6,815
Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $0 $1,989,927 $6,806,495
Page | 103
United Nations Population Fund (2010/11FY)
Economic Governance
39%
Gender, Youth Development and Sports
16%
Health45%
UNFPA – Summary Table (2008/09FY - 2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 209/10FY 2010/11FY
UNFPA $34,568 $278,578 $3,254,130
Economic Governance $0 $0 $1,255,675
Education $0 $0 $0
Gender, Youth Development and Sports $0 $0 $534,085
Health $34,568 $278,578 $1,464,370
Integrated Rural Development $0 $0 $0
Tourism, Wildlife and Culture $0 $0 $0
Page | 104
World Food Programme (2010/11FY)
Education 52%
Vulnerability,Disaster
and Risk Management
48%
WFP - Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
World Food Programme $45,282,166 $14,262,245 $22,168,270
Education $17,261,317 $5,205,402 $11,557,705
Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management $28,020,849 $9,056,843 $10,610,565
Page | 105
World Health Organization (2010/11FY)
Health100%
WHO – Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
World Health Organization $2,270,658 $4,945,726 $2,749,299
Health $2,270,658 $4,945,726 $2,749,299
Page | 106
DEVELOPMENT PARTNER ANALYSIS – EMERGING DONORS
People’s Republic of China
Republic of India
Arab Donors:
Arab Bank for Economic Development
OPEC Fund
Kuwait Fund
Page | 107
People’s Republic of China (2010/11FY)
Education 42%
Roads, Public Works and
Transport 24%
Tourism, Wildlife and
Culture 34%
`
P. R. China – Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
People's Republic of China $0 $133,300,000 $96,151,399
Democratic Governance $0 $50,000,000 $0
Education $0 $30,000,000 $39,959,749
Roads, Public Works and Transport $0 $23,300,000 $23,300,000
Tourism, Wildlife and Culture $0 $30,000,000 $32,891,650
Page | 108
Republic of India (2010/11FY)
Education 42%
Roads, Public Works
and Transport
24%
Tourism, Wildlife and
Culture 34%
Republic of India – Summary Table (2008/08FY- 2010/11FY)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
Republic of India $65,028 $5,591,312 $73,357,388
Roads, Public Works and Transport $65,028 $5,591,312 $21,678,694
Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development $0 $0 $21,678,694
Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $0 $0 $30,000,000
Page | 109
Arab Bank for Economic Development (2010/11FY)
Roads, Public Works and
Transport 58%
Water, Sanitation and
Irrigation 42%
BADEA - Summary Table (2008/09 FY - 2010/11FY)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
BADEA $656,434 $6,049,933 $14,583,390
Roads, Public Works and Transport $656,434 $2,924,035 $8,470,385
Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $0 $3,125,898 $6,113,005
Page | 110
OPEC Fund (2010/11FY)
Roads, Public Works and Transport
60%
Water, Sanitation and
Irrigation 40%
OPEC Fund - Summary Table (2008/08FY - 2010/11FY)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
OPEC Fund $143,000 $2,686,163 $4,186,332
Education $0 $0 $0
HEALTH $0 $0 $0
Roads, Public Works and Transport $143,000 $1,323,267 $2,495,871
Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $0 $1,362,896 $1,690,461
Page | 111
Kuwait Fund
Kuwait Fund- Summary Table (2008/08FY - 2010/11FY)
2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY
Kuwait Fund $478,906 $0 $0
Roads, Public Works and Transport $478,906 $0 $0
Page | 112
ANNEX I: Definition and List of Project Implementing Units Project Implementation Unit -
Embedded When providing development assistance in a country some donors establish
Project Implementation Units (They are also commonly referred to as project
management units, project management consultants, project management
offices, project coordination offices etc.). These are dedicated management units
designed to support the implementation and administration of projects or
programmes. PIUs typically share the following key features:
PIUs are TYPICALLY required to perform subsidiary (rather than principal) tasks with regard to the implementation of a project or programme: monitoring and reporting on technical and/or financial progress, accounting, procurement of works, goods and services, drawing-up of terms of reference, contract supervision, detailed design or equipment specification.
PIUs are often established at the request of a donor following the inception of a project or programme.
The staff of PIUs vary considerably in size and composition. Staff size can vary from 1 to as many as 200 but most count less than 10 professional staff. Although a significant number of PIUs make use of government staff, most PIUs are externally recruited (e.g. long-term local consultants).
A distinction is made here between a PIU and technical advice provided directly to national administrations.
Parallel PIU
A PIU is parallel when it is created and operates outside existing country
institutional and administrative structures at the behest of a donor. In practice,
there is a continuum between parallel and integrated PIUs. The criteria below
have been designed to help donors and partner authorities draw a line within this
continuum and identify with greater certainty parallel PIUs.
For the purpose of this Survey, PIUs are said to be parallel when they meet the
above criteria as well as three out of the four criteria set out below (anything less
counts as integrated):
Criterion 1: Are the PIUs accountable to the external funding agencies/donors
rather than to the country implementing agencies (ministries, departments,
agencies etc)? (Y/N)
Criterion 2: Are the terms of reference for externally appointed staff determined
by the donor (rather than by the country implementing agencies)? (Y/N)
Criterion 3: Is most of the professional staff appointed by the donor (rather than
the country implementing agencies)? (Y/N)
Criterion 4: Is the salary structure of national staff (including benefits) higher
than those of civil service personnel? (Y/N)
Technical Assistance Technical co-operation is the provision of know-how in the form of personnel,
training, research and associated costs. More broadly, technical co-operation
refers to contributions to Malawi’s development agenda primarily through the
medium of education and training.
Source: OECD DAC 2011 Survey for Monitoring the Paris Declaration for the Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness.
Page | 113
List of Project Implementing Units
Donor Project Title Type of
PIU
Project Status as of June
2011 Type Of
Assistance Primary Sector
Implementing Partner
AfDB
Lake Malawi Artisanal Fisheries Development Project
Embedded
Active - Grant and - Concessional Loan
Agriculture Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security
AfDB
Smallholder crop production and marketing project
Parallel Active Grant Water, Sanitation and Irrigation
Ministry of Irrigation and Water Development
AfDB
Support to Local Economic Development
Parallel Active Concessional Loan
Integrated Rural Development
Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development
AfDB
EDUCATION V Parallel Active Grant Education Ministry of Education, Science and Technology
AfDB
National Water Development Program
Embedded
Active Concessional Loan and grant
Water, Sanitation and Irrigation
Ministry of Irrigation and Water Development
CDC
Supporting the Scale-up of High Quality HIV Care and Treatment Programs in Malawi through a Strengthened Laboratory Infrastructure
Parallel Active Grant Health College of Medicine
CDC
Supporting the Scale-up of High Quality HIV Care and Treatment Programs in Malawi through a Strengthened Laboratory Infrastructure.(ahaoward University)
Parallel Active Grant Health Howard University
CDC
Leadership Development and Management Capacity Building for National and District Level Public Health Managers
Parallel Active Grant Health College of Medicine
Page | 114
CDC
Building human and institutional capacity in training and strategic information
Parallel Active Grant Health International Training and Education Center for Health (I-TECH)
DFID
Inputs and Maize Market (FA) - previous name was Agriculture Inputs Subsidy (FA)
Embedded
Active Grant Agriculture Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security
DFID
Inputs and Maize Market (TC)
Embedded
Active Technical Assistance
Agriculture Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security
DFID
EIMU Support FA Embedded
Active Grant Education Ministry of Education, Science and Technology
DFID
EIMU Support TC Embedded
Active Technical Assistance
Education Ministry of Education, Science and Technology
DFID
Support to national AIDS Response (FA)
Embedded
Active Grant Health Nutrition, HIV and AIDS and National AIDS Commission
EU
Emergency Food Aid
Embedded
Active Grant Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management
World Food Programme
EU
Rule of Law Institutional Support
Embedded
Active Grant Democratic Governance
Ministry of Justice
EU
Mangochi-Monkey Bay Road
Embedded
Active Grant Roads, Public Works and Transport
Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Infrastructure
EU
Farm Income Diversification Programme
Embedded
Active Grant Agriculture Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security
EU
Good Governance Programme (GGP)
Embedded
Active Grant Democratic Governance
Ministry of Finance
EU
NAO Capacity Building Programme
Embedded
Active Technical Assistance
Economic Governance
Ministry of Finance
EU
Rural Feeder Roads
Embedded
Active Grant Roads, Public Works and Transport
Roads Authority
EU
Institutional Support to Transport Public Sector - old name Institutional Support to Transport Public
Embedded
Active Grant Roads, Public Works and Transport
Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Infrastructure
Page | 115
Bodies
EU
Capacity Building for Non State Actors - Old name Non State Actors (NSA)
Embedded
Active Grant Democratic Governance
EU
Forestry Management for Sustainable Livelihoods
Embedded
Active Grant Environment, Lands and Natural Resources
Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources
EU
Income Generating Public Works
Embedded
Active Grant Roads, Public Works and Transport
-
EU
Improved Forest Management for Sustainable Livelihoods II
Embedded
Active Grant Environment, Lands and Natural Resources
-
EU
FOOD SECURITY PROGRAMME MAFSP 2005
Embedded
Active Grant Agriculture -
ICEIDA
Support to the National Adult Literacy Programme in TA Nankumba
Parallel Active Grant Gender, Youth Development and Sports
Ministry of Woman and Child Development
ICEIDA
Monkey Bay Community Hospital Project *
Parallel Active Grant Health Ministry of Health
JICA
Technical Cooperation / the Community Vitalization and Afforestration in the Middle Shire
Embedded
Active Grant Energy and Mining
Ministry of Energy and Mines
UNDP
Development Assistance Coordination Unit (DACU)
Embedded
Active Grant Economic Governance
Ministry of Finance
UNDP
Malawi Democracy Consolidated Programme (MDCP) III
Parallel Active Grant Democratic Governance
Office of the President and Cabinet
UNDP
Poverty and Environment Initiative
Parallel Active Grant Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management
Office of the President and Cabinet
UNDP
Millennium Villages - Mwandama
Parallel Active Grant Integrated Rural Development
Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security
UNDP
Millennium Villages - Lilongwe Village (Gumulira)
Parallel Active Grant Integrated Rural Development
Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security
Page | 116
UNESCO
Capacity Building for EFA: Strengthening the TVET System in Malawi: Policy, pedagogical and institutional capacity development
Embedded
Active Grant Education Ministry of Education, Science and Technology
UNHCR
Ministry of Home Affairs
Embedded
Active Grant Democratic Governance
Ministry of Home Affairs and Internal Security
UNHCR
Ministry of Health Embedded
Active Grant Health Ministry of Health
UNAIDS
HIV/AIDS activities with NAC
Embedded
Active Grant Health Nutrition, HIV and AIDS and National AIDS Commission
UNAIDS
HIV/AIDS activities with MoWCD, MDF and Police
Embedded
Active Grant Gender, Youth Development and Sports
Ministry of Woman and Child Development
USAID
TBCAP SUPPORT TO THE MALAWI NATIONAL TB PROGRAM
Parallel Active Grant Health MANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH
USAID
USAID INITIATIVE FOR LONG TERM TRAINING CAPACITY BUILDING IN MALAWI (UILTCB)
Parallel Active Grant Agriculture World Bank
USAID
Millennium Challenge Account Compact - Power Generation
Parallel Active Grant Energy and Mining
Ministry of Energy and Mines
WB
Second National Water Project (World Bank)
Parallel Active Concessional Loan
Water, Sanitation and Irrigation
Ministry of Irrigation and Water Development
WB
Community Based Rural Land Development
Parallel Active Grant Environment, Lands and Natural Resources
Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources
WB
Education Sector Support Project
Parallel Active Grant Education Ministry of Education, Science and Technology
WB
Irrigation, Rural Livelihoods and Agriculture Development (IRLAD)
Parallel Active Grant Water, Sanitation and Irrigation
Ministry of Irrigation and Water Development
Page | 117
WB
Infrastructure Services Project
Parallel Active Grant Roads, Public Works and Transport
Ministry of Economic Planning and Development
WB
Business Environment Strengthening (BESTAP)
Parallel Active Grant Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development
Ministry of Industry and Trade
WB
Third Social Action Fund APL 2
Parallel Active Concessional Loan
Integrated Rural Development
Ministry of Finance
WB
Community Based Rural Land 2 (Pipeline Project)
Parallel Active Grant Agriculture -
WB
Regional Communications Infrastructure Program - Phase 3
Parallel Active Grant Information Technology
-
WB
Malawi Third Social Action Fund (MASAF 3) (LDF Mechanism)
Embedded
Active - Agriculture - Education - Public Administration - Roads, Public Works and Transport
-
BADEA
Small Farms Irrigation Project
Parallel Active Concessional Loan
Water, Sanitation and Irrigation
Ministry of Irrigation and
Water Development
BADEA
Construction of Three Teachers Training Colleges in Rumphi, Mchinji and Chikwawa
Parallel Active Concessional Loan
Education Ministry of Education,
Science and Technology