+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Managing a Complex Energy System –...

Managing a Complex Energy System –...

Date post: 20-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
4
www.eco.on.ca Managing a Complex Energy System – Results Annual Energy Conservation Progress Report – 2010 (Volume Two) Backgrounder Under the Environmental Bill of Rights, 1993, the Environmental Commissioner of Ontario (ECO) reports annually to the Legislative Assembly of Ontario on the province’s progress in energy conservation. Managing a Complex Energy System – Results is the second volume of the Annual Energy Conservation Progress Report – 2010. Volume One, released in June 2011, focused on the policy framework for energy conservation, providing an extensive review of electricity developments as well as a concise analysis of a regulatory decision affecting funding of natural gas conservation. This second volume measures progress against established energy targets, and reviews natural gas industrial conservation programs, the Ontario Power Authority’s Conservation Fund, and electricity retrofit programs for commercial and institutional buildings. In the public debate over energy, conservation is often ignored. Over the past year, there has been a great deal of attention focused on prices, renewable energy, and natural gas power plants. Concerns about the aesthetic and health impacts of renewable and gas-fired generation dominated the energy debate. The ECO cautions that the real value of conservation has been lost in this discussion. Ontarians were left with a lopsided discussion of public policy that neglected the economic and environmental impact of growth in energy demand that is not moderated by conservation. Seldom mentioned was the fact that conservation efforts are expected to offset much of the projected growth in consumption between now and 2016. The Commissioner believes the government should make conservation a top priority because of its proven ability to save customers money and avoid new and often unpopular energy supply projects. As the past two years have shown, willing host communities of any type of power plant are few and far between. The Value of Conservation
Transcript
Page 1: Managing a Complex Energy System – Resultsdocs.assets.eco.on.ca/reports/energy/2010/2010-Energy.2... · 2016. 4. 20. · This second volume measures progress against established

www.eco.on.ca

Managing a Complex Energy System – ResultsAnnual Energy Conservation Progress Report – 2010 (Volume Two)

BackgrounderUndertheEnvironmentalBillofRights,1993,theEnvironmentalCommissionerofOntario(ECO)reportsannuallytotheLegislativeAssemblyofOntarioontheprovince’sprogressinenergyconservation.ManagingaComplexEnergySystem–ResultsisthesecondvolumeoftheAnnualEnergyConservationProgressReport–2010.VolumeOne,releasedinJune2011,focusedonthepolicyframeworkforenergyconservation,providinganextensivereviewofelectricitydevelopmentsaswellasaconciseanalysisofaregulatorydecisionaffectingfundingofnaturalgasconservation.Thissecondvolumemeasuresprogressagainstestablishedenergytargets,andreviewsnaturalgasindustrialconservationprograms,theOntarioPowerAuthority’sConservationFund,andelectricityretrofitprogramsforcommercialandinstitutionalbuildings.

Inthepublicdebateoverenergy,conservationisoftenignored.Overthepastyear,therehasbeenagreatdealofattentionfocusedonprices,renewableenergy,andnaturalgaspowerplants.Concernsabouttheaestheticandhealthimpactsofrenewableandgas-firedgenerationdominatedtheenergydebate.

TheECOcautionsthattherealvalueofconservationhasbeenlostinthisdiscussion.Ontarianswereleftwithalopsideddiscussionofpublicpolicythatneglectedtheeconomicandenvironmentalimpactofgrowthinenergydemandthatisnotmoderatedbyconservation.Seldommentionedwasthefactthatconservationeffortsareexpectedtooffsetmuchoftheprojectedgrowthinconsumptionbetweennowand2016.TheCommissionerbelievesthegovernmentshouldmakeconservationatopprioritybecauseofitsprovenabilitytosavecustomersmoneyandavoidnewandoftenunpopularenergysupplyprojects.Asthepasttwoyearshaveshown,willinghostcommunitiesofanytypeofpowerplantarefewandfarbetween.

The Value of Conservation

Page 2: Managing a Complex Energy System – Resultsdocs.assets.eco.on.ca/reports/energy/2010/2010-Energy.2... · 2016. 4. 20. · This second volume measures progress against established

www.eco.on.ca

-2-

governmentelectricityconsumptionbysome15percentcomparedtotheconsumptioninfiscalyear2002/03.(Page21)

TheECOrecommendsthattheMinisterofInfrastructureusetheGreenEnergyAct,2009directivepowertoremovebarriersfacedbycustodialministriestoachievethegovernment’selectricityconservationtarget.Forallintentsandpurposes,thegovernmenthasnowmetitsgoaltoinstallsmartmetersforalleligibleelectricitycustomers,althoughitachievedthegoalslightlylaterthananticipated,with99%ofeligiblecustomershavingmetersinstalledbyJuly2011(thetargetwastheendof2010).

ByJune30,2011,3.6millionofthesecustomerswerealsosupposedtobeshiftedovertotime-of-use(TOU)pricestotakeadvantageofthesmartmeters.Heretheprogresshasbeenslower:about2.8millioncustomershadmovedtoTOUpricingbytheJune30thtargetdate,aboutthree-quartersofthetargetamount.MostofthedelaysinTOUimplementationhavebeencausedbyunforeseentechnicalissuesthatlocaldistributioncompanies(LDCs)haveworkedtoovercome.

Whilepleasedabouttheprogressmade,theECOisdisappointedwiththedelayinTOUdatacollectionandanalysiswhichisneededtocomparepatternsofelectricityconsumptionbeforeandafterTOUbilling.ThegovernmenthasnomechanisminplacetomeasurehowpeoplehavechangedtheirconsumptionwiththeintroductionofTOUpricing.Theprices,setsemi-annuallybytheOntarioEnergyBoard(OEB),arenotbasedonactualdataofhowpricelevelsaffectcustomers’consumption.TheCommissionerbelievesthatthisdataisessentialiftheOEBistosetTOUpricesatlevelsthatmaximizetheamountofconservationfromelectricityconsumers.(Page24)

Targets and Progress

Reduce 2,700 MW of Peak Electricity Demand by 2010

Conserve Electricity inGovernment Operations

Implement Smart Meters and Time‐of‐Use Pricing

TheAnnualEnergyConservationProgressReport–2010(VolumeTwo)reviewedthreeofthegovernment’skeyconservationtargetsaswellasnewtargetssetbythegovernmentin2010toseehowmuchprogresswasbeingmade.Thegovernmentmadesubstantialprogress,butnotenoughtomeetthetargetofa2,700megawatt(MW)reductionofpeakelectricitydemandby2010thatwassetbytheMinisterofEnergy.AccordingtotheOntarioPowerAuthority(OPA),peakdemandwasreducedby1,751.9MW,duetoconservationinitiativesthatbeganin2005.

Despitenotreachingthe2010target,Ontario’sconservationeffortsdeliveredsignificantbenefitsbyreducingtheneedfornewgenerationandsavingelectricityratepayersmoney.Thereductioninpeakdemandbysome1,750MWisapproximatelyequivalenttohavingtoinstallthegeneratingcapacityofthreenaturalgaspeakingpowerplants.Byinvestingabout$1.7billioninconservationprogramsfrom2006to2010,Ontariosavedelectricityratepayers$3.8billioninavoidedelectricitysupplycosts.(Page17)Tosupportitscommitmenttoacultureofconservation,theOntariogovernmentpledgedtoreduceelectricityuseinitsownfacilitiesby10percentby2007,andanother10percentby2012.Thegovernmentaimedtoachievethesesavingsprimarilythroughupgradestoitsbuildings,employeeeducationandotheractions.Thegovernmentagency,InfrastructureOntario,metthisgoalinfacilitiesthatitmanaged,whiletheministriesthatmanagetheirownfacilities,suchastheMinistryofCommunityServicesandCorrectionalServicesortheMinistryofNaturalResources,laggedbehindbecauseinsufficientresourceswerededicatedtoimprovingefficiency.Thismeantthegovernmentwasabletoreduceitselectricityconsumptionbyonly8percentby2007,andexpectstoreachonly75percentofits2012target.Whileshortofitsgoal,thiswillstillreduce

Page 3: Managing a Complex Energy System – Resultsdocs.assets.eco.on.ca/reports/energy/2010/2010-Energy.2... · 2016. 4. 20. · This second volume measures progress against established

EnergyefficiencyisoftengivenalowprioritybyOntario’sindustrialfirms.Therearesomeverycost-effectiveopportunitiestosaveenergy,buttheyareseldomacteduponwithouttheassistanceofutilities.Toovercomethesebarriers,Ontario’snaturalgasutilities(EnbridgeandUnionGas)haveofferedindustrialconservationprogramsthatprovidetechnicalassistanceandfinancialincentives.Theseprogramshaveconsistentlydeliveredlargesavingsandhavebeenmorecost-effectivethangasconservationprogramsinanyothersector.

However,theOEBrecentlytoldthegasutilitiesthatitisnolongermandatoryforthemtooffertheseprogramstolargeindustrialcustomers.BothofOntario’sgasdistributorshavereducedtheirproposedspendingfortheselargecustomersasaresult.TheOEBactionraisestheconcernthatdistributorswillcontinuetolimitspendingoutoffearthatrequeststofinancemoreextensiveprogramswillberejectedbytheBoard.Thelikelyresultwillbeadecreaseinthefundsdirectedatindustrialgasconservation.

TheEnvironmentalCommissionerbelievesthatiftheOEBhadexplicitlyconsideredsocietalcostsofenergyconsumption,suchasgreenhousegasemissions,itwouldhavemaintainedmandatoryconservationprogramsforlargeindustrialcustomers.ThispatternofnotconsideringtheenvironmentalconsequencesofenergyconsumptionisalsoreflectedinotherrecentOEBdecisionsforelectricityconservation.TheECOsuggestsachangeinlegislationtomaketheOEBmoreeffectiveinpromotingenergyconservation,ashadbeenintendedbytheGreenEnergyandGreenEconomyAct,2009.(Page38)

TheECOrecommendsthattheMinistryofEnergyamendtheOntarioEnergyBoardAct,1998sothattheOntarioEnergyBoard’sobjectivesincludehavingregardtotheenvironmentalcostsassociatedwithenergyconsumption.

In2010,thegovernmentintroducedtwomajornewelectricitytargets:

LDCConservationandDemandManagementTargets–2014

Forthefirsttime,LDCshavebeenassignedmandatoryconservationtargets.Theyarecollectivelyrequiredtoachieve1,330MWofpeakdemandsavingsin2014and6,000gigawatt-hours(GWh)ofconsumptionsavingsfrom2011to2014.Eachutilitywasgivenashareofthistargetanditwasmadeaconditionoftheirlicence.TheECOisconcernedthatLDCswillnotmeettheirtargetsduetoalatestartinlaunchingtheprograms,anddifficultiesingettingprogramapprovalsfromtheOEB.Todate,onlytwoLDCshaveappliedfortheBoard-Approvedprograms,whichwillbeneededifLDCsaretomeettheirtargets,andeachapplicationwaswithdrawnfollowinganunfavourabledecisionororderbytheOEB.TheEnvironmentalCommissionerurgesthegovernmentandtheOEBtopromptlyimplementchangestoensurethatthetargetismet.Failingthat,thegovernmentshouldreconsiderthetargettimelineof2014.TheECOalsorequeststhegovernment,theOPA,andtheOEBclarifywhetherandhowLDCscancredittheconservationsavingsthatwilloccurwithTOUpricingtowardstheirindividualLDCconservationtargets.(Page27)

Province-WideElectricityConservationTargets–2015andBeyond

Province-wideelectricityconsumptionanddemandreductiontargetswerealsoestablishedfortheperiodafter2014.TheOPAwilldiscloseitsstrategyformeetingthesetargetswhenitreleasesanupdatedIntegratedPowerSystemPlan.TheCommissionerisconcernedwiththelackoftransparencyinsettingthesenewprovince-widetargets.ThisissimilartowhatoccurredwhenthetargetsthatLDCsmustmeetby2014wereset.TheECObelievesthatthegovernmentdidnotmakeenoughinformationavailableaboutthemethodandassumptionsthatunderliethesetargets,sothepubliccouldnotjudgewhetherthesetargetsweresufficienttodeliveranoptimalamountofconservation.(Page34)

www.eco.on.ca

-3-

Reviews of Conservation Programs

Natural Gas Industrial Conservation Programs

New Targets

Page 4: Managing a Complex Energy System – Resultsdocs.assets.eco.on.ca/reports/energy/2010/2010-Energy.2... · 2016. 4. 20. · This second volume measures progress against established

-4-

TheEnvironmentalCommissioneralsoreviewedfourconservationprogramsthatoperatedbetween2007and2010toimproveenergyefficiencyinexistingcommercialandinstitutionalbuildings.Theseprogramswerecost-effectiveindeliveringelectricitysavings,butgenerallydidnotachievetheirtargets.

In2011,theOPAreplacedtheseprogramswithanewprovince-wideprogramprovidingfinancialincentivesforbuildingretrofits,aswellasfundingforaudits,buildingcommissioningandbuildingoperatortraining.TheECOsupportstheseprogramenhancementsbutbelievesincreasedincentivesandmoreeducationandoutreacheffortsmaybeneededtomeetsavingstargets.

TheECOnotesabarriertoprogramparticipationthatprogrammanagersflaggedaboutthecommercialretrofitprogramsthatranfrom2007to2010.SomepotentialprogramparticipantsdeclinedtoparticipatebecausetheywerelegallyrequiredtogivetheOPAownershipofallenvironmentalattributes,suchascarboncreditsresultingfromreducedgreenhousegasemissions.(Page44)

TheECOrecommendsthattheOntarioPowerAuthorityreleaseclaimstoownershipofenvironmentalattributesarisingfromconservationprojectsfundedwiththeaidofOntarioPowerAuthorityincentives.

Electricity Retrofit Programs for Commercial and Institutional Buildings

The Conservation Fund

TheECOexaminedgrantsfromtheOPA’sConservationFundthatareawardedtostimulateinnovationinconservation,testuniqueelementsofconservationinitiatives,buildcapacity,andsupportpilotprojects.From2005to2010,theFundprovidedalmost$15millionto97projectsacrossallsectors,andtestedanumberofinitiativesthatarenowincorporatedintoOPA’sregularconservationprogramportfolio.TheOPAplanstomakemoreuseoftargetedRequestsforProposalsonspecificpriorityareasforelectricityconservationinvestments.TheECObelievesthatthereisacontinuingneedforaprogramliketheConservationFundtodriveimprovementsinconservationprogramdesignandencourageinnovation.(Page48)

Aussidisponibleenfrançais

Formoreinformation,contact:MariaLeungCommunicationsandOutreachCoordinatorEnvironmentalCommissionerofOntario416-325-3371/[email protected]

1075 Bay Street, Suite 605

Toronto, ON

M5S 2B1, Canada

T: 416.325.3377 F:416.325.3370

Toll free: 1.800.701.6454

[email protected]

The Environmental Commissioner of Ontario is the provinceʹs independent environmental watchdog, appointed by the Legislative Assembly. The ECO monitors and reports on compliance with the

Environmental Bill of Rights, the governmentʹs progress in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and its actions towards achieving greater energy conservation in Ontario.

The Conservation Fund

DownloadtheEnvironmentalCommissioner’s2010EnergyConservationProgressReportManagingaComplexEnergySystem–Resultsat

wwwecoonca. . .


Recommended