+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using … · 2019. 4. 10. · Mapping...

Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using … · 2019. 4. 10. · Mapping...

Date post: 15-Oct-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 12 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
17
NJK /Sept 2016 1 North Atlantic 2016 – Durham Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using Satellite Gravity Anomaly Inversion for the North Atlantic: Some Answers but Many Questions Nick Kusznir Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK Email: [email protected] Aim •To present evidence for Iceland being underlain by lithosphere with some continental component? •To make some observations of analogous phenomena using global crustal thickness mapping from satellite gravity inversion
Transcript
Page 1: Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using … · 2019. 4. 10. · Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using Satellite Gravity Anomaly Inversion

NJK /Sept 2016

1

North Atlantic 2016 – Durham

Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using

Satellite Gravity Anomaly Inversion for the North Atlantic: Some

Answers but Many Questions

Nick KusznirEarth and Ocean Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK

Email: [email protected]

Aim

•To present evidence for Iceland being

underlain by lithosphere with some

continental component?

•To make some observations of analogous

phenomena using global crustal thickness

mapping from satellite gravity inversion

Page 2: Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using … · 2019. 4. 10. · Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using Satellite Gravity Anomaly Inversion

NJK /Sept 2016

2Abstract

Gravity anomaly inversion of satellite derived free-air gravity incorporating a lithosphere thermal gravity anomaly correction data now provides a useful and reliable methodology for mapping global crustal thickness in the marine domain (Chappell & Kusznir, GJI, 2008). The resulting maps of crustal thickness and continental lithosphere thinning factor may be used to determine continent-ocean boundary location, and the distribution of oceanic lithosphere, micro-continents and oceanic plateaux (e.g. Alvey et al., EPSL 2008). Crustal cross-sections using Moho depth from gravity inversion allow continent-ocean transition structure and magmatic type (magma poor, “normal” or magma rich) to be determined. Using crustal thickness and continental lithosphere thinning factor maps with superimposed shaded-relief free-air gravity anomaly, we can improve the determination of pre-breakup rifted margin conjugacy and sea-floor spreading trajectory during ocean basin formation.

Gravity anomaly inversion of satellite derived free-air gravity incorporating a lithosphere thermal gravity anomaly correction data now provides a useful and reliable methodology for mapping global crustal thickness in the marine domain (Chappell & Kusznir, GJI, 2008). The resulting maps of crustal thickness and continental lithosphere thinning factor may be used to determine continent-ocean boundary location, and the distribution of oceanic lithosphere, micro-continents and oceanic plateaux (e.g. Alvey et al., EPSL 2008). Crustal cross-sections using Moho depth from gravity inversion allow continent-ocean transition structure and magmatic type (magma poor, “normal” or magma rich) to be determined. Using crustal thickness and continental lithosphere thinning factor maps with superimposed shaded-relief free-air gravity anomaly, we can improve the determination of pre-breakup rifted margin conjugacy and sea-floor spreading trajectory during ocean basin formation.

Crustal thickness mapping (figure 1b) shows large crustal thicknesses (> 30 km) under SE Iceland (Torsvik et al., PNAS, 2015) extending offshore to the NE and consistent with SE Iceland being underlain by continental crust associated with a southern continuation of the Jan Mayen micro-continent. This interpretation is supported by geochemical evidence.

Plate restoration to 83 Ma of crustal thickness derived from gravity inversion for the S Atlantic (figure 2) shows the Rio Grande Rise and Walvis Ridge forming a single feature which is analogous to Iceland. Some continental component has been proposed for the Rio Grande Rise. Similar features with anomalously thick crust within the ocean domain with continental affinity are also observed within the Indian Ocean (Torsvik et al., Nature Geoscience, 2014) and appear to be attractors for ocean ridge jumps. Some of many questions are whether these regions clearly within the oceanic domain are underlain by lithosphere with some continental compositional component and whether the ridge jumps are attracted by rheological weaknesses controlled by compositional or thermal anomalies.

Page 3: Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using … · 2019. 4. 10. · Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using Satellite Gravity Anomaly Inversion

NJK /Sept 2016

3

•3D spectral inversion for Moho depth - Parker (1972)- Low pass Butterworth filter ( λ = 100 km)

•Smith’s theorem – unique solution for assumptions made

•Lithosphere thermal gravity anomaly correction

- Oceanic and rifted continental margin lithosphere have elevated geothermal gradients- Large negative thermal gravity anomaly (< -350 mgal) - Correction needed to determine Moho depth from gravity inversion

•Magmatic addition prediction uses decompression melting model of White & McKenzie (1989)

•Sediment density model assumes normal

compaction

Global Oceanic Crustal Thickness Mapping using Satellite Gravity Inversion

•Greenhalgh & Kusznir, Geophys. Res. Lettr., 2007

•Chappell & Kusznir, Geophys. J. Int., 2008

•Alvey, Gaina, Kusznir & Torsvik, EPSL, 2008

•Cowie & Kusznir, J. Petrol Geol., 2012

•Torsvik et al. Nature Geoscience, 2013

•Torsvik et al., PNAS, 2015

•Cowie, Kusznir & Manatschal et al., GJI, 2015

•Cowie, Angelo, Kusznir, Manatscahl & Horn,

Petroleum Geoscience, 2016

Example validation

Page 4: Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using … · 2019. 4. 10. · Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using Satellite Gravity Anomaly Inversion

NJK /Sept 2016

4

Crustal Thickness (km)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Global Oceanic Crustal

Thickness Mapping using

Satellite Gravity Inversion

(Kusznir, Cowie & Alvey, 2014)

Page 5: Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using … · 2019. 4. 10. · Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using Satellite Gravity Anomaly Inversion

NJK /Sept 2016

5

Crustal Basement Thickness from Gravity Inversion

North Atlantic & Iceland

(Kusznir, 2015; in Torsvik et al.,

PNAS, 2015)http://www.pnas.org/content/112/15/E1818.abstract

Page 6: Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using … · 2019. 4. 10. · Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using Satellite Gravity Anomaly Inversion

NJK /Sept 2016

6

Crustal Basement Thickness from Gravity Inversion

North Atlantic & Iceland Comparison of Gravity and Seismic Moho Depths

(Kusznir, 2015; in Torsvik et al.,

PNAS, 2015)

Page 7: Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using … · 2019. 4. 10. · Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using Satellite Gravity Anomaly Inversion

NJK /Sept 2016

7

(Torsvik et al., PNAS, 2015)

North Atlantic & Iceland

(Kusznir, 2015; in Torsvik et al.,

PNAS, 2015)

Page 8: Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using … · 2019. 4. 10. · Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using Satellite Gravity Anomaly Inversion

NJK /Sept 2016

8

(Torsvik et al., PNAS, 2015)

North Atlantic & Iceland

Crustal Basement Thickness from Gravity Inversion (m)

•Thick crust under SE Iceland extending to NE

•Skjaldarsgrunn

•Distinct from FIR

•Continental component from geochemical

•Fragment of Jan Mayen

Page 9: Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using … · 2019. 4. 10. · Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using Satellite Gravity Anomaly Inversion

NJK /Sept 2016

9

Rifted Continental Margins

• Magma Poor

• “Normal”

• Magma Rich

(courtesy Manatschal)

Page 10: Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using … · 2019. 4. 10. · Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using Satellite Gravity Anomaly Inversion

NJK /Sept 2016

10

•Reference crustal thickness = 35 km•Volcanic margin (ocean crust thickness = 10 km, γcrit = 0.5)•Breakup age = 54 Ma•Oldest isochron used = 54 Ma, defines cooling age only•Lithosphere thermal correction on•With sediments: Density compaction controlled•Sediments: merged NOAA-NGDC & Laske et al.

Norwegian Margin Crustal Thickness from Gravity InversionMagma Rich Palaeocene Breakup - Moere, Voering & Jan Mayen Margins

Crustal Basement Thickness (m)

& Superimposed Shaded Relief Free Air Gravity

(Watson & Kusznir, 2010)

Page 11: Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using … · 2019. 4. 10. · Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using Satellite Gravity Anomaly Inversion

NJK /Sept 2016

11

•Reference crustal thickness = 35 km•Volcanic margin (ocean crust thickness = 10 km, γcrit = 0.5)•Breakup age = 54 Ma•Oldest isochron used = 54 Ma, defines cooling age only•Lithosphere thermal correction on•With sediments: Density compaction controlled•Sediments: merged NOAA-NGDC & Laske et al.

Norwegian Margin Crustal Thickness from Gravity InversionMagma Rich Palaeocene Breakup - Moere, Voering & Jan Mayen Margins

Crustal Basement Thickness (m)

& Superimposed Shaded Relief Free Air Gravity

•Reference crustal thickness = 35 km•Volcanic margin (ocean crust thickness = 10 km, γcrit = 0.5)•Breakup age = 54 Ma•Oldest isochron used = 54 Ma, defines cooling age only•Lithosphere thermal correction on•With sediments: Density compaction controlled•Map sediments – merged NOAA-NGDC & Laske et al.•Xsection sediments – NPD Bulletin 8 (Blystad et al.), iSIMM

(Watson & Kusznir, 2010)

Page 12: Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using … · 2019. 4. 10. · Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using Satellite Gravity Anomaly Inversion

NJK /Sept 2016

12

•Reference crustal thickness = 35 km•Volcanic margin (ocean crust thickness = 10 km, γcrit = 0.5)•Breakup age = 54 Ma•Oldest isochron used = 54 Ma, defines cooling age only•Lithosphere thermal correction on•With sediments: Density compaction controlled•Sediments: merged NOAA-NGDC & Laske et al.

Norwegian Margin Crustal Thickness from Gravity InversionMagma Rich Palaeocene Breakup - Moere, Voering & Jan Mayen Margins

Crustal Basement Thickness (m)

& Superimposed Shaded Relief Free Air Gravity

•Reference crustal thickness = 35 km•Volcanic margin (ocean crust thickness = 10 km, γcrit = 0.5)•Breakup age = 54 Ma•Oldest isochron used = 54 Ma, defines cooling age only•Lithosphere thermal correction on•With sediments: Density compaction controlled•Map sediments – merged NOAA-NGDC & Laske et al.•Xsection sediments – NPD Bulletin 8 (Blystad et al.), iSIMM

(White et al., Nature, 2008)

Faeroes-Shetland, Moere &

Voering Basins separated from

Norwegian Sea Oceanic Crust

by Thicker Crust with

Continental Component

Page 13: Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using … · 2019. 4. 10. · Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using Satellite Gravity Anomaly Inversion

NJK /Sept 2016

13

Norwegian Margin Crustal Thickness from Gravity InversionMagma Poor Oligocene Sea-floor Spreading on the Aegir Ridge

& Breakup West of Jan Mayen

(Breivik et al. JGR, 2006)(Kodaira et al. JGR, 1998)

Page 14: Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using … · 2019. 4. 10. · Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using Satellite Gravity Anomaly Inversion

NJK /Sept 2016

14

(a)

(b)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Cru

stal

thic

knes

s (k

m)

0 Ma

83 Ma

South Atlantic: Rio Grande Rise & Walvis Ridge

Plate

Reconstructions

Restoration of

Crustal Thickness

using GPlates v1.5

(Kusznir, Cowie & Alvey, 2014)

Page 15: Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using … · 2019. 4. 10. · Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using Satellite Gravity Anomaly Inversion

NJK /Sept 2016

15

(a)

(b)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Cru

stal

thic

knes

s (k

m)

0 Ma

83 Ma

South Atlantic: Rio Grande Rise & Walvis Ridge

Plate

Reconstructions

Restoration of

Crustal Thickness

using GPlates v1.5

Recovered Granite Recovered Granite on RGRon RGR

(Kusznir, Cowie & Alvey, 2014)

Page 16: Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using … · 2019. 4. 10. · Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using Satellite Gravity Anomaly Inversion

NJK /Sept 2016

16Indian Ocean: Seychelles, Mascarene & Nazareth Banks & Mauritius

Repeated Ocean

Ridge Jumps

Creating Thicker

Oceanic Crust

Mauritius Pre-Cambrian Zircons

(Continental Lithosphere?)

(Torsvik et al. Nature, 2013)

(Alvey & Kusznir, 2011)

(Alvey & Kusznir, 2011)

Page 17: Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using … · 2019. 4. 10. · Mapping Crustal Thickness, OCT Structure and Crustal Type Using Satellite Gravity Anomaly Inversion

NJK /Sept 2016

17

Questions

Iceland, Rio Grande Rise, Mauritius, Conrad Rise, Crozet Plateau etc

• Are these regions underlain by lithosphere (or deeper tectosphere)

with some continental compositional component?

• They are associated with rift/ridge jumps

• Are these intra-ocean ridge jumps attracted by rheological

weaknesses controlled by compositional or thermal anomalies (or

both)?

• Can these ocean ridge jumps (and hot spots) be explained by upper

mantle chemical heterogenity and thermal “weather” (+/- a few

tens of oC)?


Recommended