http://marine.rutgers.edu/~wilkin [email protected]
Experimental System for Predicting Shelf and
Slope Optics
Research developing bio-optics, CODAR and
coastal altimetry assimilation
methodologies
Ocean Modeling GroupInstitute of Marine and Coastal Sciences
http://myroms.org/applications/espresso
ES
Pre
SS
O
Ocean Modeling Group: Coastal ocean physics and ecosystem prediction
Data assimilative modeling for analysis and forecasting of coastal ocean dynamics for: - maritime and ecosystem forecasting - observing system design and operation - wave-current-sediment & air-sea interaction - ecosystem-physics feedbacks
John L. WilkinHernan Arango, Bronwyn Cahill, Naomi Fleming,
Julia Levin, Javier Zavala-Garay
4DVAR* Assimilation in ROMS for ESPreSSO/MARCOOS domain: Cape Hatteras to Cape Cod
MARCOOS operational analysis and prediction system72-hour forecast with forcing:
• NCEP NAM-WRF meteorology• tides (TPXO)• daily river transport (USGS)• open boundary conditions HyCOM+NCODA
Assimilates:• altimeter along-track SLA• satellite IR SST• CODAR surface currents• climatology• glider T,S• GTS: XBT/CTD, Argo, NDBC buoys
Experimental System for Predicting Shelf
and Slope Optics (research)
and
MARCOOS (operational)
ES
Pre
SS
O
*4-Dimensional Variational data assimilation
MARCOOS operational system
Work flow for operational MARCOOS 4DVAR Analysis interval is 00:00 – 24:00 UTC
Input data preparation commences 01:00 EST (06:00 UT)
• 72-hour forecast (NAM-WRF meteorology 0Z cycle at 10 pm EST)
• RU CODAR is hourly - but with 4-hour delay
• RU glider T,S where available (approx 1 hour delay)
• USGS daily average flow available 11:00 EST
– persist in forecast
• AVHRR IR passes 6-8 per day (approx 2 hour delay)
• HyCOM NCODA 7-day forecast updated daily
• Jason-2 along-track SLA via RADS (4 to 16 hour delay for OGDR)
– Also ENVISAT and Jason-1 NRT data (OGDR and IGDR)
• SOOP XBT/CTD, Argo floats, NDBC buoys via GTS from AOML
• T,S climatology (MOCHA*)
*Mid-Atlantic Ocean Climatology Hydrographic Analysis
Work flow for operational MARCOOS 4DVAR
• Input preprocessing completes approximately 05:00 EST
• 4DVAR analysis completes approx 08:00 EST
• analysis is followed by 72-hour forecast using NCEP NAM 0Z cycle available from NOMADS OPeNDAP at 02:30 UT (10:30 pm EST)
• Forecast complete and transferred to OPeNDAP by 09:00 EST
OPeNDAP http://tashtego.marine.rutgers.edu:8080/thredds/catalog.htmlncWMS http://tashtego.marine.rutgers.edu:8081/ncWMS/godiva2.html
• Effective forecast is ~ 60 hours
SSH and velocity forecast during Nov 2009 glider OSSE
Temp (5m depth) and velocity during Nov 2009 glider OSSE
Temperature on cross-section 4 during Nov 2009 glider OSSE
Work flow for operational MARCOOS 4DVAR Analysis interval is 00:00 – 24:00 UTC
Input data preparation commences 01:00 EST (06:00 UT)
• 72-hour forecast (NAM-WRF meteorology 0Z cycle at 10 pm EST)
• RU CODAR is hourly - but with 4-hour delay
• RU glider T,S where available (approx 1 hour delay)
• USGS daily average flow available 11:00 EST
– persist in forecast
• AVHRR IR passes 6-8 per day (approx 2 hour delay)
• HyCOM NCODA 7-day forecast updated daily
• Jason-2 along-track SLA via RADS (4 to 16 hour delay for OGDR)
– Also ENVISAT and Jason-1 NRT data (OGDR and IGDR)
• SOOP XBT/CTD, Argo floats, NDBC buoys via GTS from AOML
• T,S climatology (MOCHA*)
*Mid-Atlantic Ocean Climatology Hydrographic Analysis
Phytoplankton 4 Groups
NO3 SiO PO4 FeO
1 2 3 4
Fecal Detritus
DIC
CDM
DOC, DON & DOP
Bacteria
NH4
Grazing
Uptake / Autotrophs
LossesUptake / Heterotrophs
RemineralizationCarbon Fixation
Chlorophyll Pigments
IOPs
Aphy(λ,z)
aCDM(λ,z)
Ed(0,λ)
1% Ed(0, λ)
Ecosystem models (7 ecosystem models in ROMS) (1)EcoSim – plankton, nutrients, pigments, light
State variables (about 60):NO3, NH4, P, C, Fe, Si, Bac(4), DOM(4), CDM(4), Det(2x5), Phyt(4x4), Pigments(~15)
Rapid primary production within the re-circulating freshwater bulge
EcoSim – phytoplankton mortality, POC export and oxygen depletion are affected by river plume dynamics and optics
Phytoplankton mortality generates particulate organic carbon (POC) that is exported to bottom waters. Site of this benthic oxygen demand depends no circulation
Freshwater anomaly Phytoplankton C1 (mmol C m -3) POC (mmol C m-3) POC (mmol C m-3)
Freshwater anomaly Phytoplankton C1 (mmol C m-3) POC (mmol C m-3) POC (mmol C m-3)
NO3
Chlorophyll
Largedetritus
Organic matter
N2 NH4 NO3
Water column
Sediment
Phytoplankton
NH4
Mineralization
Uptake
Nitrification
Nitrification
Grazing
Mortality
Zooplankton
Susp.particles
Aerobic mineralizationDenitrification
Ecosystem models: (2) BioFennel – plankton, nitrogen, oxygen, carbon, ΔpCO2
Assimilation experiments with sequential update of chlorophyll
(1) datacycle, ΔpCO2
ModelForcing +
BoundariesInitial
ConditionsValidation
SkillAssessment
Run Period
January to July 2006
forward
ROMS Forward+ Biomass-Based
(Fennel) Model+ Continuous
Update
Model BiasRMSE
Model SkillTaylor diagrams
T/SMLDChlPP
ROMS Forward+ Biomass-Based
(Fennel) Model
EspressoReanalysis
NCEP-NARRTIDES
MABGOM
3 day update
10 day update
Physics
Chl
ESPreSSO Re-analysisBias corrected ocean estimate by sequential assimilation of climatology, SST and SSH. Dynamically balanced T / S fields.
Forward model no assimilation
Assimilation physics only
Assimilation physics and chlorophyll
Taylor Diagram for Chlorophyll: July 2006 test
Centered pattern RMS error, E’
Correlation coefficient, R
Taylor, K. E. (2001), Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram, JGR, 106, 7183-7192
Forward model no assimilation
Assimilation physics and chlorophyll
Assimilation physics only
Data
Assimilation improves chlorophyll solution