+ All Categories
Home > Documents > MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

Date post: 30-Dec-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 4 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
88
Turbine Inlet Non-Uniformities and Unsteady Mechanisms CHIVES MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY JUN 23 2015 LIBRARIES by Devon Jedamski Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2015 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2015. All rights reserved. Signature redacted Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Certified by. Certified by. Signature redacted May 26, 2015 Edward M. Greitzer H.N. Slater Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Signature redacted Thesis Supervisor .. .............. . Choon S. Tan Accepted by .... Senior Signature redacted Research Engineer Thesis Supervisor Paulo C. Lozano Associate Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair, Graduate Program Committee Author ..
Transcript
Page 1: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

Turbine Inlet Non-Uniformities

and Unsteady Mechanisms

CHIVESMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE

OF TECHNOLOLGY

JUN 23 2015

LIBRARIESby

Devon Jedamski

Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronauticsin partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of

Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics

at the

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

June 2015

Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2015. All rights reserved.

Signature redactedDepartment of Aeronautics and Astronautics

Certified by.

Certified by.

Signature redacted May 26, 2015

Edward M. GreitzerH.N. Slater Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics

Signature redacted Thesis Supervisor.. ...............

Choon S. Tan

Accepted by ....

Senior

Signature redacted

Research EngineerThesis Supervisor

Paulo C. LozanoAssociate Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics

Chair, Graduate Program Committee

Author

..

Page 2: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

2

Page 3: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

Turbine Inlet Non-Uniformities

and Unsteady Mechanisms

by

Devon Jedamski

Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronauticson May 26, 2015, in partial fulfillment of the

requirements for the degree ofMaster of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics

Abstract

The effect of axial turbine stage inlet non-uniformities are examined through twomodel problems: wake attenuation and hot streak processing. In the first, two-dimensional calculations (RANS and URANS) are used to identify the mechanismscontributing to upstream stator wake attenuation through a turbine blade row. Fora representative turbine rotor, pitch and time-averaged wake attenuation by 74%percent is demonstrated at one quarter chord downstream of the trailing edge. Nearthe pressure surface, the wake stagnation pressure increases by up to 42% above thefreestream stagnation pressure. The mechanisms identified are a localized reduction inflow-through time for wake fluid near the pressure surface, compared to the freestream,and an unsteady pressure field (Op/&t) in the rotor reference frame that increases workextraction in the freestream relative to wake fluid. For the second model problem,three-dimensional calculations (RANS and URANS) identify a difference in turbineefficiency sensitivity to thermal distortion between a geometry with no tip gap anda geometry with a finite tip gap. The turbine with a tip clearance is 2.5 times lesssensitive, in terms of efficiency decrease, to an inlet hot streak. For the tip gap andno tip gap geometries, the efficiency drops by 0.75% and 1.86% respectively for apeak temperature non-uniformity equal to 0.6 times the combustor temperature rise.The difference in efficiency decrease, due to hot streak, between the two geometries islinked to a reduction in tip leakage mixing losses caused by changes in relative rotorinlet flow angle with and without hot streak.

Thesis Supervisor: Edward M. GreitzerTitle: H.N. Slater Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics

Thesis Supervisor: Choon S. TanTitle: Senior Research Engineer

3

Page 4: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

4

Page 5: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

Acknowledgments

"Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and lean not on your own understanding. In

all your ways acknowledge Him, and He shall direct your paths."

- Proverbs 3:5-6

The following research was conducted with the generous support of the Rolls-

Royce Whittle Fellowship. The work represents a close collaboration between the

MIT Gas Turbine Laboratory and the Turbine Aerodynamics group at Rolls-Royce

Corporation in Indianapolis.

This work could not have been possible without the support and guidance of

my advisors, Professor Greitzer and Dr. Choon Tan. I would also like to thank

Arthur Huang, a previous Rolls-Royce Whittle Fellow, for his direction and insightful

feedback throughout my first year at MIT.

The engineers of the Rolls-Royce Turbine Aerodynamics group have been an im-

mense help. In particular, Jon Ebacher, Eugene Clemens, Ed Turner, Chong Cha,

and Steve Mazur provided assistance throughout the entirety of this thesis that was

invaluable to its completion. Steve Mazur laid the framework for the beginning of

my research and was always willing to assist with valuable discussions and direction.

In addition, Tyler Gillen and the members of the Rolls-Royce Methods group, Todd

Simons, Kurt Weber, and Moujin Zhang were always willing to help in implementing

HYDRA for my research.

To Mom and Dad, I would not be here today without your love, support, and sac-

rifice. I would also like to thank Derek and Katie. You are the best siblings I could

have asked for; never let me forget to stay humble. Finally, and most importantly, I

would like to thank my wife, Christiana, who has been my biggest supporter through-

out graduate school. You are kind, loving, and most importantly, you've taught me

to find joy in all seasons.

5

Page 6: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

6

Page 7: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

Contents

1 Introduction

1.1 Background . . . . . . . . . .

1.1.1 Wake Attenuation . . .

1.1.2 Hot Streak Processing

1.2 Research Questions . . . . . .

1.3 Methodology . . . . . . . . .

1.3.1 Wake Attenuation. . .

1.3.2 Hot Streak Processing

1.4 Contributions . . . . . . . . .

1.5 Organization of Thesis . . .

2 Wake Kinematics: Kelvin's Theorem and

2.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.2 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.3 Kelvin's Theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.4 Computational Methodology . . . . . . .

2.4.1 Blade Design Specification . . . .

2.4.2 Boundary Conditions and Mesh .

2.5 R esults. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.5.1 Wake Attenuation Metric . . . .

2.5.2 Attenuation Quantification

7

Wake

19

20

20

22

23

23

23

24

24

25

27

27

28

28

30

31

31

31

32

Convection

32

Page 8: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

3 Assessing Wake Attenuation in a Turbine Blade Row 37

3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

3.2 B ackground . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

3.3 Computational Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38

3.3.1 Boundary Conditions and Mesh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38

3.3.2 Blade Parameters and Mesh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40

3.4 Averaging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40

3.5 R esults . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42

3.5.1 Reversible Wake Attenuation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42

4 Separation of the Wake Attenuation Mechanisms 47

4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47

4.2 Governing Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48

4.3 Linearization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

4.4 R esults . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50

4.4.1 Attenuation Mechanism Interpretation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53

5 Effects of Hot Streaks on High Pressure Turbine Efficiency 55

5.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55

5.2 Computational Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55

5.2.1 Turbine Geometry and Mesh Specification . . . . . . . . . . . 57

5.2.2 Boundary Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58

5.2.3 Unsteady Phase Averaging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61

5.3 Generalized Efficiency Definition for Unsteady Non-Uniform Flows . . 63

5.4 Effect of Tip Gap and Hot Streak on Efficiency . . . . . . . . . . . . 65

6 Hot Streak Loss Mechanisms and Utility of Entropy as a Turbine

Loss Metric 67

6.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67

6.2 Spatial Averaging and Efficiency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68

6.2.1 Averaging Non-Uniform Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69

8

Page 9: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

6.2.2 Effect of Efficiency Definition on Computed Turbine Stage Sen-

sitiv ity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1

6.3 R esults . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73

6.3.1 Entropy Generation Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73

6.3.2 Blade Incidence Angle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76

6.3.3 Tip Leakage Massflow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76

6.3.4 Tip Gap Loss Scaling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77

6.3.5 Efficiency Sensitivity to Inlet Hot Streak . . . . . . . . . . . . 79

7 Summary, Conclusions, and Recommendations for Future Work 83

7.1 Summary and Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83

7.1.1 Reversible Wake Attenuation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83

7.1.2 Effects of Hot Streaks on Turbine Stage Efficiency . . . . . . . 84

7.2 Recommendations for Future Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85

9

Page 10: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

10

Page 11: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

List of Figures

1-1 Compressor rotor wake evolution through a stator passage at peak

pressure rise condition; lines present analysis, symbols present data 1201.

1-2 Chopping and stretching of an incoming wake [181 . . . . . . . . . . .

2-1 Computed compressor wake transport, =- 0.85 [8]. . . . . . . . . . .

2-2 Computed turbine wake transport, q = 0.34 [8]. . . . . . . . . . . . .

2-3 Convected wake geometry evolution through passage, 2 (p - po) /p .2

2-4 Upstream and downstream wake velocity triangles . . . . . . . . . . .

2-5 Stagnation pressure defect far downstream for a convected wake segment

3-1 Inlet boundary condition, c = 0.25 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3-2 Stagnation pressure defect ratio contour, E = 0.1 . . . . . . . . . . . .

3-3 Stagnation pressure defect ratio at axial locations, c = 0.1 . . . . . .

3-4 Axial velocity defect in wake, e = 0.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3-5

3-6

4-1

4-2

4-3

4-4

4-5

4-6

Difference between convected and finite wake analyses . .

Difference in Op/Dt between wake and freestream fluid at

6 = 0.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Stagnation pressure defect, e = 0.025 . . . . . . . . . . .

Wake attenuation for four wake depths, x/cx = 1.25 . . .

Time averaged velocity, ftx/ux,o . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Velocity perturbation, '/(EU) . . . . . .. . . . . . . .

Non-dimensionalized unsteady pressure perturbation . .

Non-dimensionalized axial velocity perturbation . . . . .

21

22

29

29

33

33

34

40

42

43

44

45

axial slices,

. . . . . . 46

. . . . . . 48

. . . . . . 49

. . . . . . 50

. . . . . . 50

. . . . . . 52

. . . . . . 52

11

Page 12: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

4-7 Computed D(Apt)/Dx from unsteady CFD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53

4-8 Computed D(Apt)/Dx from linearized analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53

4-9 Description of unsteady pressure mechanism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54

4-10 Description of flow-through time mechanism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54

5-1 Vane and rotor surface mesh, TG-2% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56

5-2 First stage meridional view comparison for TG-0% and TG-2% . . . . 57

5-3 Circumferentially averaged inlet temperature distribution, OTDF = 0.6 60

5-4 Inlet temperature profile, OTDF = 0.6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60

5-5 OTDF contour, circumferential clocking of the hot streak . . . . . . 61

5-6 Instantaneous efficiency over two cycles, OTDF = 0.4 . . . . . . . . 62

5-7 Power spectrum of instantaneous efficiency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63

5-8 Hot streak sensitivity for TG-0% and TG-2% . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65

6-1 Hot streak sensitivity as a function of efficiency definition . . . . . . 72

6-2 Viscous entropy generation rate within control volume . . . . . . . . 74

6-3 Thermal entropy generation rate within control volume . . . . . . . . 75

6-4 Interstage rotor relative incidence angle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77

6-5 Pressure contour at 95% span, TG-2% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78

6-6 Tip leakage mass flow rate reduction with OTDF . . . . . . . . . . . 79

6-7 Turbine stage loss components . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80

6-8 Entropy generation in the tip gap, TG-2% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81

6-9 Efficiency with control volume model correction . . . . . . . . . . . . 82

6-10 Efficiency sensitivity to entropy production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82

12

Page 13: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

List of Tables

2.1 Turbine stage parameters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

5.1 Turbine stage parameters, OTDF 0 .0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58

5.2 CFD inlet boundary conditions and solver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59

6.1 Isentropic expansion temperature definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72

13

Page 14: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

14

Page 15: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

Nomenclature

Letters

cP Specific heat at constant pressure

cX Axial chord

d( ) Differential quantity

D/Dt Convective derivative

ht Stagnation enthalpy

HPT High pressure turbine

k Thermal conductivity

Line element vector

Af Differential wake length

L Wake segment

r4 Mass flow rate

M Mach number

N Feature count (vane, rotor, hot streak, etc.)

OTDF Overall temperature distribution function

p Static pressure

Pt Stagnation (or "total") pressure

R Gas constant

RTDF Radial temperature distribution function

s Entropy per unit mass

Entropy production per unit volume

S Entropy production within a control volume (= f a dV)

15

Page 16: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

t

T

T

TG

U

U

V

AV

W

(x, r, 0)

(x, y, z)

y +

Ratio of specific heats

Circulation (f w dA)

Wake thickness

Difference or change

Wake strength (1 - umax/Umin)

Isentropic efficiency

Dynamic viscosity

Loss coefficient

Density

Work coefficient (Aht/U 2 )

Flow coefficient (UX/U)

Radian frequency (27f)

16

Time

(1) Blade passing time

(2) Static temperature

(3) Time of periodicity

Stagnation (or "total") temperature (T + U 2/2 c,)

Tip gap

Velocity magnitude

Velocity components in cartesian coordinates

Blade translational speed

Volume

Wake velocity defect

Pitch

Polar coordinates

Cartesian coordinates

Non-dimensional wall cell distance

Symbols

17

/1

p

pI

Page 17: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

Vorticity

Blade rotational speed

Subscripts

fs

main

max

min

irr

1

S

t

th

tip

V

w

(x, y, z)

0

0, 1, 2, etc.

Free stream average

Quantity representative of mainstream

Maximum value

Minimum value

Denotes an irreversible process

Denotes quantity due to laminar process

Denotes process at constant entropy

(1) Stagnation quantities

(2) Denotes quantity due to turbulent process

Thermal component

Quantity representative of tip-gap

Viscous component

Wake average

Components in x, y, z directions

Reference station

Station numbers

Superscripts

( )'- (e.g. ft)

aa

A

M

wa

Perturbation quantity

Mean or background flow variable

Availability average

Area average

Mass average

Work average

17

w

Q

Page 18: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

Mixed out averageX

18

Page 19: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

Chapter 1

Introduction

Inlet non-uniformities to a turbine stage have the potential to either increase or

decrease stage performance. This thesis examines two model problems in the context

of inlet non-uniformity processing. The first is wake attenuation in a turbine blade

row. The second is the effect of a hot streak on turbine stage performance and the

aerodynamic mechanisms that influence stage efficiency sensitivity to hot streak.

In an axial compressor, there is consensus that wake fluid receives more work

than freestream fluid due to a longer flow-through time for wake particles. The

unsteady, reversible work transfer to the wake decreases wake mixing losses and thus

increases component efficiency. Various descriptions of the phenomenon and of the

mechanism have appeared in the literature 18, 17, 18]. In contrast, there is not

consensus concerning the different amounts of work extracted from the freestream

and wake fluid that pass through a turbine blade row. This thesis addresses that

issue.

There has been exploration of hot streak migration in the context of blade cooling

and thermal loads [16, 11]. Flow structures such as the "positive jet" induce circum-

ferential migration of the hot streak and increase the heat load on the pressure surface

of the first stage rotor 110]. The swirling flow in the rotor can create a radial pres-

sure gradient leading to radial migration of the hot streak toward the rotor tip [11].

Questions still remain however, regarding the effect of hot streak on stage efficiency.

Addressing this issue is the objective of this thesis.

19

Page 20: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

The thesis does the following:

" Identifies two mechanisms for wake attenuation: a pitchwise variation in flow-

through time of the wake particles compared to the freestream and an unsteady

pressure in the relative coordinate system that increases local freestream work

extraction.

" Relates wake deformation to downstream wake stagnation pressure 18] to quan-

tify the effect of the first mechanism.

" Identifies and explains the relationship between turbine efficiency sensitivity to

inlet hot streak magnitude and turbine tip leakage flow.

" Examines and compares existing efficiency definitions and presents a suggested

efficiency metric for flows with hot streaks and large thermal dissipation.

1.1 Background

1.1.1 Wake Attenuation

Viscous mixing of upstream wakes represents a substantial portion of losses in tur-

bomachinery. Hall et al. report wake mixing losses representing 20% and 13% of the

profile loss for a baseline compressor and uncooled turbine stage respectively, at peak

efficiency conditions [5]. For a steady flow at uniform pressure, wake attenuation is

achieved by an irreversible mixing process. When the decrease in wake depth occurs

reversibly, without mixing, it is referred to as reversible attenuation or wake recovery.

Irreversible wake mixing losses may be reduced by reversible attenuation of the wake

downstream of the blade row before full mixing of the wake occurs, as shown in [17].

For steady flow, attenuation of the velocity defect has been shown by Denton 13] to

be produced by favorable pressure gradients in a contraction. Attenuation of a stag-

nation pressure defect by unsteady mechanisms is described by Greitzer et al. 141 and

Smith [17]. The focus of the this thesis is reversible wake attenuation by unsteady

mechanisms and differential work transfer.

20

Page 21: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

Reversible attenuation results in reduced mixing losses and improved component

performance. Figure 1-1 shows rotor wake depth plotted versus distance through

the compressor stator at a peak pressure rise condition [201. The "viscous" only

curve indicates viscous mixing (irreversible attenuation) at uniform pressure. The

two lines labeled "stretching only" and "viscous + stretching" represent reversible

wake attenuation alone and reversible and irreversible wake attenuation combined.

Laser anemometer measurements are shown by the crosses. The curve including

both viscous and reversible attenuation has a smaller viscous component than the

"viscous only" line, because the smaller viscous mixing is reduced by the reversible

wake attenuation.

Figure 1-1 illustrates the means by which a compressor wake may be attenuated.

Initially the wake fluid has a lower stagnation pressure than the freestream. If the

wake fluid receives more work than the freestream as it travels through the passage,

the stagnation pressure defect decreases. Similarly, for a turbine, if less work were

extracted from the wake fluid than the freestream fluid, the wake defect would be

decreased.

vlscous only NS

Si hs n -stretching only

0.2 -viscous+stretchingW

0 20 40 so so 100 2io

% Stator Axial Chard

Figure 1-1: Compressor rotor wake evolution through a stator passage at peak pres-sure rise condition; lines present analysis, symbols present data [201.

Smith has explained this effect using Kelvin's theorem' [17] for an inviscid wake.

'Kelvin's theorem states that for an inviscid and barotropic flow with conservative body forces,the circulation around a fluid contour is constant in time.

21

Page 22: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

This analysis captures the effect well for a compressor, and Van Zante et al. iden-

tify it as the dominant mechanism in reversible wake attenuation [20]. As a wake

segment passes through a blade row, the wake segment changes through end-to-end

stretching of the wake segments. If we assume the wake segments remains linear and

are uniformly stretched, Kelvin's theorem implies that stretching of the wake along

the centerline direction means a consequent decrease in the wake velocity defect and

thus the mixing losses. This is seen in Figure 1-2 where segment AB is stretched so

that CD > AB as it passes through the compressor rotor.

Fixed Incoming Wake

B

\U

\ C

D 'Moving Rotor Fixed "Avenue"Streamlines\ Along Which

Wakes Proceed

Figure 1-2: Chopping and stretching of an incoming wake [181

1.1.2 Hot Streak Processing

Hot streak processing in high pressure turbines is an active research area and a sum-

mary of the findings and related fluid mechanics are presented below.

A hot streak is defined, for purposes of this thesis, as a temperature non-uniformity

at the combustor-turbine interface caused by discrete fuel injectors in the combustor.

It has been observed that there is a decrease in stage efficiency in high pressure

turbines when subjected to a hot streak, but at the present the cause is still not clear.

Several mechanisms for migration of turbine hot streaks have been presented.

These include radial migration of the hot streak, baroclinic torque, inlet swirl, and tip

flow ingestion [16, 111. Circumferential migration mechanisms include what is known

22

Page 23: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

as the segregation effect or the Kerrebrock-Mikolajczak effect [101, which has been

used to explain the increased heat load seen on the pressure surface. The increased

heat load at the tip has been ascribed to radial migration, however, the link with

aerodynamic performance is not yet clear. The dominant effect isolated in this thesis

is the relative flow angle variation and subsequent blade loading imposed by the hot

streak at the rotor.

1.2 Research Questions

The aim of this work is to quantify the impact of turbine inlet non-uniformities

on stage performance. The specific topics are stagnation pressure defects from up-

stream stator wakes and stagnation temperature non-uniformities from combustor

hot streaks. The research questions are:

e Are stator wakes attenuated through a turbine rotor row?

e How does wake evolution differ between turbine and compressor blade rows?

e How does a hot streak at the combustor-turbine interface change the high pres-

sure turbine stage efficiency with and without the presence of a tip gap?

9 Are mixing plane calculations sufficient to predict the variation in stage effi-

ciency with inlet hot streak strength?

1.3 Methodology

1.3.1 Wake Attenuation

To answer the first two research questions, two types of two-dimensional calculations

have been used. The first utilizes RANS CFD for an isolated rotor to illustrate

the convection of tracer particles, a surrogate for the vorticity in the wake which is

convected by a background steady flow. The second is an unsteady simulation of a

moving blade row with a stagnation pressure non-uniformity at the inlet. This set of

23

Page 24: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

calculations captures the same effect, but at a higher fidelity, to give insight into the

mechanisms of reversible wake attenuation.

Results from the steady calculations show reversible attenuation is possible, de-

spite compression of the wake segment, and quantify the magnitude for a represen-

tative turbine geometry. A reversible attenuation of 46% is found from the steady

background flow calculations. The unsteady calculations show reversible wake at-

tenuation of 74% one quarter chord downstream of the trailing edge for the same

geometry.

1.3.2 Hot Streak Processing

To answer the third and fourth research questions, we have analyzed two geometries

to determine the dependence of turbine efficiency sensitivity to hot streaks for a

stage with a tip clearance and a stage without tip gap. Both RANS and URANS

calculations for a vane-rotor first stage high pressure turbine geometry were used to

characterize the sensitivity of the stage efficiency to hot streaks for the two geometries.

A comparison of efficiency definitions is also presented to show the importance

of selecting a proper efficiency metric. Viscous dissipation in the rotor is used to

quantify loss sources and highlight tip leakage flow mixing as a dominant effect in

setting stage efficiency sensitivity to inlet hot streak.

1.4 Contributions

The contributions of this thesis are:

9 It is shown that there can be reversible wake attenuation in a turbine. The

process is different than for a compressor because, velocity gradients normal

to the wake orientation deform the wake. An inviscid attenuation of 74% has

been demonstrated for a representative geometry. It is also shown that the

wake can increase in stagnation pressure relative to the freestream near the

pressure surface if the wake is turned such that the velocity defect vector points

24

Page 25: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

downstream.

" Wake segments in a turbine are not purely stretched or compressed as can

be approximated for a compressor. Bowing and turning of the segments can

reorient the velocity defect from pointing upstream to downstream, decreasing

or increasing the wake flow-through time compared to the freestream. The

unsteady pressure field in the relative coordinate system can also provide work

extraction from the wake relative to the freestream in the passage.

" The calculated efficiency sensitivity to inlet hot streak for a rotor with a tip

clearance is similar for steady CFD with a mixing plane and unsteady CFD

with phase-lag boundary conditions.

" For the turbine geometry examined, a turbine rotor with a 2% clearance is

roughly twice as sensitive to hot streaks than the same rotor with no tip gap.

The difference in hot streak sensitivity is attributed to a reduction in tip leakage

mass flow and thus tip leakage mixing losses, compared to the rotor operating

without a hot streak.

" A turbine performance efficiency definition is proposed for evaluating turbine

efficiency sensitivity to hot streaks. The efficiency definition utilizes a work-

averaged inlet condition and mixed-out exit condition to conserve enthalpy flux

and work output between the original three-dimensional unsteady flow field and

the averages.

1.5 Organization of Thesis

The remainder of this thesis is separated into two primary sections to address the

preceding research questions; Chapters 2 through 4 address wake attenuation and

Chapters 5 and 6 address hot streak processing. Chapter 2 describes a model used

to highlight the change in wake flow-through time relative to freestream. Chapter

3 shows, with unsteady CFD, that reversible attenuation is possible by two inviscid

25

Page 26: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

mechanisms. Chapter 4 shows where each mechanism contributes to wake attenua-

tion. Chapter 5 describes the approach and design of computations for the hot streak

research questions. Chapter 6 evaluates the effect of inlet hot streak on the turbine

stage and highlights tip leakage flow as the cause of the difference in stage perfor-

mance sensitivity to inlet hot streak for the two geometries. Finally, Chapter 7 gives

a summary, conclusions, and recommendations for future work.

26

Page 27: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

Chapter 2

Wake Kinematics: Kelvin's Theorem

and Wake Convection

2.1 Introduction

In this chapter, wake convection by a steady background flow is used as a qualitative

tool to interpret wake attenuation and the differences between turbine and compressor

wake evolution. We extend work by Joslyn, Caspar, and Dring f8J to determination of

the downstream stagnation pressure distribution in the wake, using Kelvin's theorem

and the wake geometry. The results show a reversible attenuation of the wake by 46%

which is associated with the first of two mechanisms to be described.

The analysis in this chapter is based on thin wakes with small velocity defect which

are convected by a steady background flow. In contrast to previous approximations

of the wake as a single linear segment, we use a distribution of infinitesimal control

volumes along the wake to calculate the distribution of wake quantities downstream

of the turbine. The analysis is useful to explain results in subsequent chapters and

to identify the importance of wake segment turning in the wake attenuation process.

27

Page 28: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

2.2 Background

For a compressor blade row, a streamtube expands as it passes through the row. If

we approximate the wake as a linear segment with uniform velocity defect, Kelvin's

theorem can be stated as in Equation 2.1 where L denotes the segment length and AV

denotes the wake velocity defect. In a compressor, wake stretching typically occurs

because of both streamtube expansion and blade circulation, leading to end-to-end

stretching of the wake, described as

=o A <1 (2.1)LcO A V

where 0 denotes a station far upstream, and oc denotes far downstream, of the rotor.

Figure 2-1 presents tracer particles convected by an inviscid, steady background

flow in a compressor. Upstream wake segments are absolute streamlines and each

line segment represents a snapshot of the wake as it convects through the blade

passages. Figure 2-1 illustrates wake segment stretching through the turbine blade

row as described in Equation 2.1.

Suppose now that we apply these arguments to a turbine blade row. Assuming

the wake remains straight with uniform stretching as before, we would conclude that

the wake segment is compressed, the wake defect is amplified, and that wake mixing

losses are increased. Figure 2-2 however shows that this viewpoint is too naive; the

wake segment end-to-end length decreases through the turbine blade row, but the

arc length of the wake segment increases. The explanation for wake attenuation in

a compressor thus cannot be directly extended to turbine blade rows because the

assumptions are not valid.

2.3 Kelvin's Theorem

Kelvin's theorem states that the circulation, F, of a material contour remains constant

in time for an inviscid, barotropic flow with conservative body forces. The circulation

around a closed material contour, N, is defined as

28

Page 29: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

Um

8 Ci

5 V

WAKE 1 -0

Figure 2-1: Computed compressor wake

transport, 0 = 0.85 [81.

V1

UM C1

6

60

V22

Figure 2-2: Computed turbinetransport, 0 = 0.34 [8].

vake

(2.2)F = Ju -d,N

where u is velocity and df is an element of fluid contour N. The theorem is expressed

as

DF 0Dt

(2.3)

If it is assumed a material contour enclosing a segment of the wake and the

neighboring freestream fluid is convected by the freestream, and the wake velocity

defect does not deform the material contour, the circulation is defined as AV df

where AV is the upstream defect velocity and df is the length of the differential

wake segment. Kelvin's theorem states that the circulation of this material contour

is constant. At two time instants, 1 and 2, the differential wake segment length and

velocity defect are related by

dfA V2 = A V, d .(2.4)

Equation 2.4 implies that if a differential wake segment is stretched (d1/df2 < 1)

29

Page 30: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

as it passes through a geometry, the local wake defect decreases (AV/A V2 > 1). If the

wake defect is decreased, wake mixing losses are also decreased because mixing losses

scale with (AV) 2 for incompressible flow. Wake stretching is thus analogous to wake

attenuation and reduced mixing losses. The wake mixing entropy production scales

with (AV) 2 but is also a function of the defect vector orientation. The stagnation

pressure defect is used here as a metric for potential loss generation as it incorporates

both velocity defect and orientation.

The velocity defect used in Equation 2.4 is a scalar and represents the wake velocity

defect (the freestream velocity minus the wake centerline velocity). The velocity

component in the wake normal to the wake centerline, must be equal to the freestream

normal component because the normal velocity flux to the material contour must be

equal to zero. The velocity defect vector thus must have a magnitude equal to AV

and direction parallel to the local orientation of the wake segment, de.

For a wake with small thickness and wake defect, the wake may be viewed as

an unsteady perturbation on a steady background flow. Using Kelvin's theorem,

the wake defect evolution can be analyzed by tracking the geometry of the wake as

it deforms in the passage. This is the methodology used in the remainder of this

chapter.

2.4 Computational Methodology

The calculations described in this chapter use an inlet velocity boundary condition

that models the stagnation pressure defect from an upstream stator. There is no

stator-rotor interaction and the background flow field is steady in the rotor frame.

ANSYS@ Fluent v14.5 was used as the flow solver for this work. The inviscid

solver was employed to separate inviscid reversible wake attenuation from viscous

attenuation. The flow is incompressible.

30

Page 31: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

2.4.1 Blade Design Specification

The turbine airfoil is designed using the 11 parameter model developed by Pritchard

115] and selected by Mazur [12] for his work. The relative and absolute flow angles

are set by the definition of the work coefficient (0), the flow coefficient (0), and the

stage reaction (R). Table 2.1 shows the turbine stage parameters.

Table 2.1: Turbine stage parameters

Parameter

Work Coefficient (/)Flow Coefficient (#)Stage Reaction (R)Axial ChordTangential ChordUnguided TurningInlet Half Wedge AngleNumber of BladesNumber of Stators

Assigned Value

1.600.750.50Specified so that Z, = 0.8Specified by Kacker and Okapuu Correlation 1911501405858

2.4.2 Boundary Conditions and Mesh

Two-dimensional linear cascade meshes of approximately forty thousand cells were

created using the Rolls-Royce code PADRAM. The computational domain extends

one chord upstream to provide space to seed the wake particles, and two chords

downstream to let the wake develop after exiting the blade row. At the inlet, the

velocity and flow-angle are specified. At the outlet, o( )/&x is set to zero. Finally,

the flow is circumferentially periodic.

2.5 Results

The geometry in Table 2.1 which is representative of turbine stage parameters, ex-

hibits a reduction of the end-to-end length of the wake segments. However, wake

attenuation occurs, in conflict with the analysis described in Equation 2.1.

31

Page 32: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

2.5.1 Wake Attenuation Metric

A metric for wake attenuation is defined in Equation 2.5, referred to as the stagnation

pressure defect ratio. Subscripts fs and w denote freestream and wake respectively.

All values of stagnation pressure are defined in the absolute reference frame. Spatial

coordinates are defined in the relative coordinate system. In Equation 2.5, fs is

defined as the steady background flow and w is defined as the conditions in the

convected infinitesimal wake. Equation 2.5 represents the stagnation pressure defect

at station x, non-dimensionalized by the stagnation pressure defect upstream of the

blade row. A value less than one indicates reversible wake attenuation (and less

potential for wake mixing losses). Similarly, values greater than one represent wake

growth and increased potential for mixing losses.

(Pt,!s - PtW)X (2.5)(Pt,fs - Pt'W)O

In later sections, the stagnation pressure defect ratio is evaluated with time aver-

aging to construct representative quantities for fs and w. Details on the averaging

technique will be given in Section 3.4.

2.5.2 Attenuation Quantification

The turbine geometry is shown in Figure 2-3 with the centerlines of the convected wake

segments marked at uniformly distributed time steps. Upstream of the blade row,

the wake centerlines are straight and represent absolute streamlines. The contours

identify pressure coefficient using the upstream static pressure and relative dynamic

pressure as reference. The contour intervals are 0.25.

As discussed in Section 2.2, the wake velocity defect and orientation may be

inferred from the wake centerline geometry, with magnitude defined by the localized

stretching of the wake and orientation determined by the orientation of the local wake

segment. Figure 2-4 shows velocity vectors, in the absolute reference frame, at the

inlet station and at a downstream station.

The wake geometries in Figure 2-4 were extracted (far upstream and far down-

32

Page 33: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

[- 1.0

0.0

-1.0

-2.0

-3.00.0 0.5 1.0

x/cx

Figure 2-3: Convected wake geometry evolution through passage, 2 (p - po)/p u4

Upstream Downstream1.0 1.0

- free-streaim

-- defect

-- wake

0.5 0.5

0.0 0.00.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0

x/cx x/cx

Figure 2-4: Upstream and downstream wake velocity triangles

stream) from the solution shown in Figure 2-3. The velocity triangles are not indi-

cated on the upstream wake segment because in the absolute reference frame they are

collinear with the wake segment (the upstream wake segment is an absolute stream-

line). The downstream segment is taken far enough downstream to be outside the

pressure field of the rotor in Figure 2-3. The wake segment is (i) compressed, (ii)

bowed, and (iii) turned with respect to the segment end points. In the figure, the

freestream vector denotes the velocity of the background flow in the absolute reference

frame. The defect is a vector of magnitude inversely proportional to the local wake

stretching and with direction of the local wake angle. The wake velocity is then the

33

Page 34: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

vector summation of the freestream velocity and the wake defect velocity. Although

the initial velocity defect is equal to 0+ for this analysis, the velocity triangle is scaled

up for visualization.

For an infinitesimal initial wake velocity defect, we can calculate the stagnation

pressure defect ratio explicitly from the wake geometry evolution. Figure 2-5 displays

the downstream stagnation pressure defect ratio for this limiting case (i.e. Figure 2-5

is the stagnation pressure derived from the velocity triangles in Figure 2-4 taken at

the limit as the wake thickness and upstream defect vector goes to zero). In Figure

2-4, y/W = 0.00 denotes the suction surface stagnation streamline and y/W 1.00

denotes the pressure surface stagnation streamline.

1.5

1.0 -

0.5 -

0.0 -

-0.5 -

3 -1.0

-1.50.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00

y/W

Figure 2-5: Stagnation pressure defect far downstream for a convected wake segment

Figure 2-5 shows that the wake is attenuated for all pitch-wise locations, except

for y/W from 0.24 to 0.43. An average stagnation pressure defect (average wake

attenuation) can be calculated by using the stretching to determine local wake width.

For a differential wake segment, the area of the material contour (product of w and

df) is constant in an incompressible flow, as in Equation 2.6,

dA = w df = constant. (2.6)

An area average (denoted by superscript A) of some quantity F is calculated

34

Page 35: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

using Equation 2.7. The variable is weighted by the local differential area, dA. In

the integral bounds, 0 and L represent the endpoints of the wake.

L

F =_ Fwdd (2.7)f dA A 0

Regions where the wake is compressed are weighted larger in an area averaged

stagnation pressure defect due to increased wake area per differential length. The

calculated average stagnation pressure defect is equal to 0.54 for Figure 2-5, or 46%

reversible attenuation of the wake.

This wake kinematics are one of two mechanisms identified as cause for reversible

wake attenuation. As to be shown in Equation 3.3 in Chapter 3, the work extraction

is a function of axial velocity and the unsteady pressure. If the wake fluid has a higher

axial velocity, it can pass through the blade row with less work extracted, as on the

pressure surface of the turbine in Figure 2-4 and Figure 2-5. The increase in axial

velocity is related not only to stretching of the wake segment, but also its turning.

The combination of stretching and turning results in attenuation and can cause an

increase in wake stagnation pressure above freestream (pt, > pt,fs) near the pressure

surface.

The stagnation pressure defect distribution can be used to further interpret Figures

2-1 and 2-2. For a compressor, the wake segment is stretched such that its velocity

defect decreases. In the turbine however, the velocity defect vector is turned in the

wake near the pressure surface so the velocity defect is directed downstream (i.e. wake

fluid has higher axial velocity than freestream fluid), and local stagnation pressure

in the wake is increased relative to the freestream. The increase in wake stagnation

pressure above the freestream stagnation pressure is consistent with the geometric

results in Figure 2-4 and the quantitative results shown in Figure 2-5.

35

Page 36: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

36

Page 37: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

Chapter 3

Assessing Wake Attenuation in a

Turbine Blade Row

3.1 Introduction

In this chapter we identify a second mechanism of inviscid wake attenuation using

unsteady computations of an isolated rotor and a wake with non-zero thickness and

velocity defect. We show that the unsteady pressure field (in the relative reference

frame) increases work extraction in the freestream relative to the wake fluid. While

the analysis in Chapter 2 yielded a wake attenuation of 46%, the results in Chapter 3

predict wake attenuation of 74% when both mechanisms are included. This chapter

establishes an upper bound for wake attenuation for the given geometry in the absence

of viscous attenuation.

3.2 Background

For inviscid incompressible flow, the relation between the temporal variation in static

pressure and the change in stagnation pressure for a fluid particle is given in Equation

3.1.

Dpt O_ ~(3.1)Dt Ot

37

Page 38: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

Far upstream or downstream of the blade row, &p/&t ~ 0, and the stagnation pressure

is then a convected quantity of a given particle, Dpt/Dt = 0. For the turbine blade

row, each particle must travel the same axial distance from inlet to exit. It is therefore

useful to examine the rate of change of a particle's stagnation pressure with respect

to axial position, x, rather than time. In Equation 3.2, the left hand side, Dpt/Dx,

is the rate of change of a particle's stagnation pressure defined with respect to axial

distance traveled over time increment Dt; Dx = u Dt

Dpt -1 Dpt (3.2)Dx ux Dt

Substitution of Equation 3.2 into Equation 3.1 yields Equation 3.3 which shows

the two effects that contribute to stagnation pressure changes in the passage. The

first is the axial velocity, ux. If the value for Op/lt is negative (work extraction) as

it is in a turbine, a wake particle that spends less time in the passage will have less

work extraction. This is referred to as flow-through time, as described by Smith for a

compressor [17]. If &p/&t varies such that the unsteady pressure magnitude is smaller

for a wake particle, then reversible wake attenuation may also be achieved even if the

flow-through time is the same for wake and freestream.

Dp- = lp (3.3)Dx ux Ot

3.3 Computational Methodology

As mentioned in Chapter 2, ANSYS® Fluent v14.5 was used as the flow solver. The

calculations described in Chapter 3 and 4 are time-accurate with the flow modeled

as inviscid and incompressible.

3.3.1 Boundary Conditions and Mesh

It is assumed that the flow far upstream is steady in the stationary reference frame

and there is no upstream influence at the wake injection point. The wake profile is

38

Page 39: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

parameterized by depth (e), profile geometry, and wake thickness (8). The parameter,

e is a measure of wake strength, as in Equation 3.4, based on the upstream freestream

velocity, uma, and the velocity at the wake centerline, Umin.

Umax - Umin (3.4)Umax

To mitigate artificial dissipation, a wake profile was selected to minimize the spa-

tial second derivative. This results in a piecewise quadratic profile with a continuous

first derivative and discontinuous second derivative as in Equation 3.6.

Uxmax 1 - (e /2W) (3.5)

0 if y ;> 6/2Ux~~m{x 1(Y if (2 8/46

UI 62 if 6/4 < jyj <6 /2 (3.6)

+1 62y<;/

All cases presented in this document utilize 8 = 0.3W where W is the pitch. This

value is a compromise between reducing velocity gradients and simulating vane wake

profiles in detail, it is representative for the effects of interest here. A time trace of

the upstream wake in the relative frame is shown over one stator passing in Figure

3-1 for e = 0.25 and 6 = 0.3 W.

The isolated rotor is circumferentially periodic. The outlet pressure is specified

as a gauge pressure (absolute pressure is not relevant in incompressible flow), and

the outlet boundary condition is applied two chords downstream, out of the region

where upstream influence is important. The mesh interface between stationary and

translating zones is one-quarter chord upstream of the leading edge. The stationary

stator zone extends one and one-half chord further upstream. The pitch to axial chord

ratio is approximately 3 : 4. The blade geometry utilizes a slip wall condition.

39

Page 40: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

1.2

1.0

0.8 -

0.6free-stream wake free-stream

0.4

0.2

0.00.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00

t/T

Figure 3-1: Inlet boundary condition, c 0.25

3.3.2 Blade Parameters and Mesh

The rotor geometry described in 2.1 is used in the unsteady finite wake propagation

calculations. The unsteady wake processing requires a higher fidelity mesh to accom-

modate the larger spatial gradients in the wake regions. The baseline two-dimensional

mesh contains approximately sixty-five thousand cells (compared to forty thousand

in Chapter 2). A sliding mesh interface is used between stationary and translating

zones of the computational domain.

The temporal solver uses a second order implicit scheme. The spatial solver is

a third-order MUSCL momentum scheme and a second order pressure solver. The

temporal resolution has 720 time steps per blade passing.

3.4 Averaging

The stagnation pressure defect in Equation 2.5 was utilized as the metric for reversible

wake attenuation. The subscripts fs and w are more complex than the definition

presented in Chapter 2 because pt,f,(X, y) - pt,w(x, y) is defined at a given coordinate

and thus requires a time averaged definition, i.e. the presence of a freestream and

wake particle at a specific spatial coordinate is mutually exclusive. The freestream

40

Page 41: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

and wake stagnation pressure values are thus defined at each point as weighted time-

average values of the fluid stagnation pressure passing over a location during one blade

passing. These values are substituted into the stagnation pressure defect in Equation

2.5 to evaluate wake attenuation in the passage. Upstream of the blade row, any

fluid within 6/2 of the wake centerline is specified as wake fluid ,with everything else

defined as freestream fluid. In the computations, the upstream fluid has a numerical

marker, P, (1 for freestream fluid and 0 for wake fluid) that convects with the fluid

particles to segregate wake from freestream fluid.

The averaging scheme used to define fs and w is presented in Equation 3.7 for

an intrinsic property of the fluid, F. Subscript fs denotes the average value of F for

fluid marked as freestream that has traveled through coordinate (x, y) over one blade

passing. The example shown in Equation 3.7 is for averaging over the freestream

fluid, and thus uses the subscript fs, but the definition is applicable to both wake

and freestream fluid.

Ff s (x, y) =F(x, y, t) dt (3.7)K(x, y)

The two unknowns in Equation 3.7 are K and C. C is defined in Equation 3.8 as

the set of times during one blade passing when freestream fluid is located at coordinate

(x, y). The flow is periodic in time T, so F(x, y, t) = F(x, y, t + a T) where a is any

integer.

C(x, y) = {t I (a E IR, t c [a, a + T]) n (P(x, y, t) = 1)} (3.8)

The variable K, defined in Equation 3.9, is the cumulative residency time of

freestream particles, i.e. the total time that freestream (or wake as appropriate)

particles are present at coordinate (x, y) over one blade passing, T,

K J dt. (3.9)

C

The averaging in Equation 3.7, which is implied for any variable with subscripts,

41

Page 42: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

fs or w, converts unsteady quantities, f(x, y, t), into steady quantities, f(x, y), to

permit evaluation of the differences in freestream and wake quantities at a specified

x, y location.

3.5 Results

The results below are for the geometry of Table 2.1 with c = 0.1. The stagnation

pressure defect defined in Equation 2.5 is used to quantify attenuation. If this ratio

is greater than one, the local stagnation pressure defect is greater than the initial

upstream condition.

3.5.1 Reversible Wake Attenuation

Figure 3-2 shows contours of the time-averaged absolute stagnation pressure ratio

(Equation 2.5) in the blade passage. Values greater than one represent wake amplifi-

cation and values less than one represent attenuation.

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

-0.5

-1.00.0 0.5 1.0

x/cx

Figure 3-2: Stagnation pressure defect ratio contour, c = 0.1

Downstream of the trailing edge, the stagnation pressure ratio, defined locally

using the scheme established in Section 3.4, is less than one for all pitchwise coordi-

nates. Although attenuation is achieved, localized amplification can be seen within

42

Page 43: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

the passage. The wake amplification achieves a maximum of 1.36 at an axial location

of x/cx = 0.23 and a pitch of y/W = 0.44. The region of amplification is small,

however, and occurs in the center of the passage where freestream shear stresses, in

a physical turbine stage with viscous stresses, are small. Therefore, the localized

wake amplification expected to be of less importance than the attenuation occurring

elsewhere in the passage. This is observed downstream where the attenuation has a

larger magnitude than the amplification in the passage.

1.5

1.0

0.5 --

0.0

-0.5 - -- C -.0

-- - /C = 1.001. .o - - x/c = 1.00

x/c = 1.25

1.5 '0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00

y/W

Figure 3-3: Stagnation pressure defect ratio at axial locations, 6 = 0.1

The stagnation pressure defect ratio at three different x/cx values is shown in

Figure 3-3 as a function of y/W. At the leading edge, there is localized amplification

but by the trailing edge of the rotor, the wake is attenuated at all circumferential lo-

cations. The location, x/cx = 1.25 represents an axial station approximately halfway

between the rotor and downstream stator. At this location, the wake is attenuated

by 74%.

Attenuation is most prominent on the pressure surface, consistent with the esti-

mates in Chapter 2, suggesting wake attenuation is a result of reduced flow-through

time for wake particles near the pressure surface.

Figure 3-4 displays the difference in axial velocity between the freestream and

wake normalized by the value at the inlet. The axial velocity of the wake is larger

than the freestream fluid on the pressure surface, resulting in a lower flow-through

43

Page 44: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

time and reduction in the work extraction from the wake fluid. This may be seen

in Equation 3.3 where the change in stagnation pressure is a function of both axial

velocity and the unsteady pressure.

3

2 -

0 \f

\ 1

--- /cX = 0.00

- - x/c = 1.00

-x/c = 1.25

-30.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00

y/W

Figure 3-4: Axial velocity defect in wake, c 0.1

The difference between Figure 3-2 and Figure 2-5 suggests there is a mechanism

captured by the unsteady calculations that is not included in the wake tracing analysis

of Chapter 2. To show this, the stagnation pressure ratio for the convected wake

(Chapter 2) and the unsteady finite wake (Chapter 3) is presented in Figure 3-5.

The solutions agree well on the pressure surface but on the suction surface there is a

significant discrepancy.

In Chapter 2, we addressed the mechanism of wake stretching and retention time

only. This is equivalent to saying that p/Ot does not depend on the presence of

the wake and the primary mechanism is changes in the axial velocity, ux. Figure 3-6

displays the unsteady pressure for several axial locations in the passage and indicates

Op/&t does vary between freestream and wake fluid. More work is extracted from

the freestream than wake fluid (wake attenuation) for y-axis values less than zero in

Figure 3-6. Near the suction surface, Op/&t decreases in magnitude when wake fluid

is present compared to freestream fluid, which reduces the difference between wake

and freestream stagnation pressure. A description of this effect is given in Chapter 4.

44

Page 45: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

1.5

1.0-

0.5 -

<0.0 -

-0.5

1.0 . -- /Cx = 00, E= 0.0x/cx = 1.25, e = 0.1

-1.5 ' ' - '0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00

y/W

Figure 3-5: Difference between convected and finite wake analyses

In summary, pressure changes due to the presence of the wake have an influence

comparable to that of flow-through time in reversible wake attenuation in a turbine.

For the geometry investigated, the computed value for wake attenuation increases

from 46% to 74% when the effect of unsteady pressure is included.

45

Page 46: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

x/cx 0.25- - x/c= 0.50---- x =0.75

;31

0.25 0.50y/W

0.75

Figure 3-6:C = 0.1

Difference in Op/&t between wake and freestream fluid at axial slices,

46

5.0

2.5

0.0

-2.5

CZ)

I-

-5.0 -0.00 1.00

Page 47: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

Chapter 4

Separation of the Wake Attenuation

Mechanisms

In this chapter, we present an analysis to illustrate the unsteady pressure (Op/&t)

and axial velocity (uX) mechanisms described in Chapter 3. We develop a linearized

form of the convective derivative, Dpt/Dx, to obtain an expression for D(Apt)/Dx,

separate the two mechanisms, and quantify the rate of change of stagnation pressure

defect through the blade row.

4.1 Introduction

We use the stagnation pressure defect ratio of Equation 2.5 and analyze the same

isolated rotor. The computations are carried out with, c = 0.025, to approximate a

linearized expression. Figure 4-1 is a visualization of the stagnation pressure defect

for c = 0.025. The similarity with Figure 3-2 indicates that non-linear terms are

small in both E = 0.025 and E = 0.1 because of the similar appearance (Figure 3-2

and Figure 4-1).

The contours in Figures 3-2 and 4-1 agree more near the inlet than at the trailing

edge because of the increased amount of fluid traveling along the wake at larger c

(i.e. the so-called negative jet [6]). However, at one quarter chord downstream of the

trailing edge, cases with c = {0.025, 0.050, 0.100, 0.200} all show the wake attenuation

47

Page 48: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

-0.5

-1.00.0 0.5 1.0

X/cX

Figure 4-1: Stagnation pressure defect, c = 0.025

to be between 74% and 81%. Figure 4-2 shows the stagnation pressure defect for

the four e values at one quarter chord downstream. All four values of wake depth

show nearly the same attenuation and show the good agreement also indicates the

linearization is appropriate for the chosen values of c.

4.2 Governing Equation

The equation for changes in stagnation pressure was presented as Equation 3.1, but

it is given again in Equation 4.1 for reference. The mechanisms that drive the evo-

lution of stagnation pressure are nonlinear for large amplitude perturbations, but for

small perturbations, Section 4.1 shows a linearized form of Equation 4.1 can be used.

The left hand side of Equation 4.1 describes the rate of change of a particle's stag-

nation pressure with respect to axial position, which is a useful metric for evaluating

stagnation pressure changes across a blade row and can be computed directly.

Dpt 1 lOp (4.1)Dx Ut at

48

Page 49: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

1.5

1.0

0.5

- 0.0

-0.5 - = 0.025e=0.050

-1.0 .=0.100c=0.200

-1.50.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00

y/w

Figure 4-2: Wake attenuation for four wake depths, x/cx = 1.25

4.3 Linearization

The variables on the right hand side of Equation 4.1, au and Dp/&t, are defined as the

the summation of a time-averaged flow field and an unsteady perturbation. The flow

is periodic and ix is the time average of ux over one blade passing. Primes denote

the perturbations.

ux(x, y, t) =x(x, y) + , (x, y, t) (4.2)

(X, y, t) =9 (X, y) + (x, y, t) (4.3)at at at

Figures 4-3 and 4-4 present the two components of Equation 4.2. Figure 4-3 is

the time-averaged background flow and Figure 4-4 is a snapshot in time showing the

axial velocity perturbations from the background time-averaged flow field. The same

process is used for p/&t but is not shown.

If the definitions in Equations 4.2 and 4.3 are substituted into Equation 3.3 we

obtain Equation 4.4 which describes the stagnation pressure evolution of a material

49

Page 50: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

2.5 3.0

2.0 2.0

1.01.5

0.01.0

-1.0

0.5 -2.0

0.0 -3.00.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0

x/c, /Cx

Figure 4-3: Time averaged velocity, Figure 4-4: Velocity perturbation,X/UX'O U' /(C e)

element,

Dpt I FOp 9P'-- + 1 (4.4)Dx x + '4 Lat ot

We now linearize Equation 4.4 to obtain Equation 4.5.

Dpt 1 Op 1 0p' _p U'- _ -- -(-5

Dx - ait ix at at (

Equation 4.5 also implies a summation of a time-averaged component and a pertur-

bation component for Dp/Dt and Dp'/Dt respectively.

4.4 Results

Equation 4.5 is the linearized form of the governing equation for changes in stagnation

pressure. The stagnation pressure defect of interest is a time-averaged quantity, there-

fore Equation 4.5 must be time averaged. The quantities (Dpt/Dx)f, and (Dpt/Dx).,

are the time-averaged rate of change for all freestream and wake particles respectively

passing through an area element centered on a point x, y with respect to their ax-

ial position. The difference in the freestream and wake derivatives then yield an

expression for the derivative of the stagnation pressure defect, Apt,

50

Page 51: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

D(Apt) DpK Dpt(Dx Dx k, Dx (46

Equation 4.6 combined with Equation 4.5, yields an expression for the rate of

change of the stagnation pressure defect, given in Equation 4.7. The time averaged

term, (Dp/&t)/i, which appears in both the freestream and wake components cancels

out leaving only the perturbed quantities.

Equation 4.7 gives the difference in the time average rate of change of the stagna-

tion pressure defect with respect to axial position,

D(Apt) _ 1 Dp>' (4U-,7) 1&p ' p lDx Kk at a ft 2 iix at at (47(")fs a;p UJI

We non-dimensionalize this expression to yield Equation 4.8. In Equation 4.8,

there are four distinct terms which affect the attenuation of the stagnation pressure

defect in the rotor passage.

2c D(Apt) 2 c[ 1 Op' 1 p ' p' OPXf (4.8)2_ _ _2 +___ " _- (4j

EpU2 Dx EpU2 &X at f iiX at at ii2 at ii2

The terms in Equation 4.8 may be grouped into the two mechanisms described

previously. The first two terms on the right hand side have a time-averaged axial

velocity field and unsteady perturbations in the static pressure. This represents the

differential work extraction through the unsteady pressure variations. The last two

terms have a time-averaged background pressure derivative and perturbations in the

axial velocity and represent the flow-through time effect.

The values for both of the terms previously described are shown in Figures 4-5

and 4-6. Interpretation of these two figures will be expanded on in Section 4.4.1.

The summation of the two mechanisms in Figures 4-5 and 4-6 is equivalent to a

linearized approximation for (2 c;)/(EpU2) (D(Apt)/Dx) and can be compared to the

computed value from the (nonlinear) CFD. The derivative, Dpt/Dx, is a modification

of the material derivative definition, as in Equation 4.9, and is evaluated for all spatial

51

Page 52: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

5.0 5.0

2.5 2.5

0.0 0.0

-2.5 -2.5

-5.0 -5.00.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0

x/cx /c,

Figure 4-5: Non-dimensionalized un- Figure 4-6: Non-dimensionalized axialsteady pressure perturbation velocity perturbation

coordinates and time in the computations. Equation 4.9 represents the material

derivative definition, Dpt/Dt, divided by ux.

Dpt _ 1 apt Opt +Upt (4.9)- - -+ + 49Dx - Ot &x Ux OY

The material derivative is averaged using the technique to determine fs and w, and

is combined with Equation 4.6 to calculate the CFD based stagnation pressure defect

derivative, D(Apt)/Dx. A comparison between the CFD results and the linearized

results is shown in Figures 4-7 and 4-8. The similarity between Figures 4-7 and 4-8

supports the linear assumption for small c.

Figures 4-5 and 4-6 demonstrate the two mechanisms that cause reversible wake

attenuation in a turbine. The flow-through time mechanism (Figure 4-6) gives a region

of attenuation near the pressure surface and amplification near the suction surface.

The unsteady mechanism in Figure 4-5 is more difficult to characterize. The primary

effect is that there exists a region in the passage where the unsteady pressure (as seen

in the relative coordinate system) removes energy from the freestream, counteracting

the amplification due to the first mechanism. A more detailed discussion is given in

Section 4.4.1.

52

5.0

Page 53: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

7]. 5.0

2.5 2.5

0.0 0.0

-2.5 -2.5

-5.0 -5.00.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0

xIC.x /c,

Figure 4-7: Computed D(Apt)/Dx from Figure 4-8: Computed D(Apt)/Dx fromunsteady CFD linearized analysis

4.4.1 Attenuation Mechanism Interpretation

Figures 4-5 and 4-6 display the spatial dependence of the two mechanisms responsible

for reversible wake attenuation. The mechanism in Figure 4-5 (pressure fluctuations)

is primarily caused by blade loading changes from impingement of the wake on the

rotor. This is most apparent in the upstream section of the passage where wake

impingement on the suction surface occurs. A cartoon is shown in Figure 4-9 where

the wake impingement near the leading edge imposes a localized high pressure region.

The high pressure region convects downstream along the suction surface such that

fluid directly downstream of the impingement point experiences a ap/&t larger than

when the wake is not present. The wake is in front of the impingement point so less

work is extracted from the wake than the surrounding freestream fluid. Although

first identified by Meyer [131, this effect is described in-depth by Hodson and Dawes

16] for a wake in a turbine passage.

The second mechanism is variation in the axial velocity and hence in particle flow-

through time between the wake and freestream. This mechanism includes a weighting

factor of &p/&t which determines whether work extraction or addition occurs locally in

the passage. Figure 4-6 shows that this mechanism imposes attenuation upstream of

the pressure surface stagnation point and downstream of the trailing edge stagnation

point. Wake attenuation occurs in these regions due to the work addition occurring

53

- 5.0

Page 54: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

0.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0x/cX x/cX,

Figure 4-9: Description of unsteady Figure 4-10: Description of flow-throughpressure mechanism time mechanism

by p/&t and the longer residency time of wake particles in this region. Conversely,

work extraction occurs in the remainder of the passage. The weighting term, Op/Dt

causes work extraction in the main passage but, the shorter flow-through time of wake

fluid leads to a reduction in work extraction in the wake. This is shown in Figure

4-10 where the positive and negative regions denote work addition and extraction

respectively. The positive region of the wake segment, u ,g [+], denotes wake fluid

traveling faster than freestream fluid and the contrary for u', 8 [-]. These two regions

describe wake attenuation and amplification respectively in agreement with the result

shown in Figure 4-6.

54

Phigh

act~

U X +1

X " H +

Page 55: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

Chapter 5

Effects of Hot Streaks on High

Pressure Turbine Efficiency

5.1 Introduction

In Chapters 5 and 6, we address a second subject: the effect of hot streaks on high

pressure turbine efficiency. Three topics are addressed. First, a method of time-

averaging is outlined that reduces flow time requirements by use of a finite impulse

response filter. Second, a generalized efficiency definition for unsteady non-uniform

flow is introduced. Third, the results are interrogated and show the efficiency of a

turbine with a tip clearance is 2.5 times less sensitive to inlet hot streak than the

same turbine with no tip gap.

5.2 Computational Methodology

The sensitivity of turbine efficiency to inlet hot streak magnitude is shortened herein

to hot streak sensitivity. Hot streak sensitivity is defined as 07r/(OTDF)'. It is

reported here for a given geometry with varying inlet hot streak magnitude.

To quantify hot streak sensitivity, two separate turbine configurations are ana-

'OTDF = max(T, 4 (r, 0) - Tk1)/(T/ - Ttj') where Al denotes mass average, station 3 is thecompressor-combustor interface, and station 4 is the combustor-turbine interface.

55

Page 56: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

(a) Meridional view of vane and rotor mesh (b) Rotor tip mesh

Figure 5-1: Vane and rotor surface mesh, TG-2%

lyzed: one with a finite tip gap and another without a tip gap. The first, with no tip

gap, is referred to as the 0% (TG-0%) clearance case. The second geometry has a tip

clearance of 2% of the rotor span (TG-2%). Both turbine geometries share a common

vane geometry and a common rotor geometry with a different casing endwall. Steady

calculations include vane and rotor and utilize a mixing plane at an interstage station

between them. The mixing plane circumferentially mixes the flow exiting the vane

and permits coupled steady CFD calculations of the two computational domains. The

unsteady calculations utilize a phase-lag boundary condition and are initialized from

the converged mixing-plane calculations.

All results related to hot streak processing utilize the Rolls-Royce proprietary CFD

code HYDRA, which solves the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equations (RANS)

and unsteady RANS (URANS) equations. All geometries use a structured mesh and

the HYDRA solver utilizes an unstructured node based solver. An example of the

mesh used for the TG-2% case is shown in Figure 5-1. Both meshes used in this study

have an average y+ of 1 to resolve the boundary layers.

The Spalart-Allmaras (SA) one equation turbulence model is used and initialized

with a turbulent to laminar viscosity ratio of 100 at the inlet to account for high

levels of turbulence of the fluid exiting the combustor [1]. The hot streak sensitivity

is found to be weakly dependent on the turbulent viscosity ratio; the sensitivity

56

Page 57: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

reduced by 11% when the viscosity ratio was lowered from 100 to 10, much smaller

than the variations caused by geometry alterations (250%). It is shown that the

change in tip leakage flow mixing with the main flow is the dominant mechanism

for turbine sensitivity reduction with hot streak strength. Huang also found that tip

leakage losses are insensitive to the inlet turbulent viscosity ratio [71, supporting the

preceding comments about turbulent viscosity ratio.

5.2.1 Turbine Geometry and Mesh Specification

The turbine simulations in this thesis utilized a mixing plane for the RANS solver and

a phase-lag boundary condition for the URANS solver to preserve full annulus blade

counts. All calculations described utilize thirty-six vanes and fifty-eight blades per

revolution. The combustor contains eighteen burners and the computational domain

includes two vanes to match the burner count, yielding a flow periodicity of one-

half revolution. A method is presented in Section 5.2.3 to reduce the computational

complexity of time-averaging efficiency and eliminate the need for the full period.

A meridional view of the turbine with the mixing plane included is shown in Figure

5-2. The black line denotes the TG-0% and red denotes TG-2%. The black vertical

line is the mixing plane and the gray lines are the vane and rotor. The rotor and vane

geometry was held constant between tip gap configurations and the casing endwall is

shifted as in Figure 5-2. No cooling flow is included and all surfaces are modeled as

adiabatic. The fluid is an ideal gas with constant specific heats, and -y = 1.3.

x

Figure 5-2: First stage meridional view comparison for TG-0% and TG-2%

57

Page 58: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

The stage parameters associated with the turbine rotor and two cases used are

shown in Table 5.1.

Tip Clearance 0.00% 2.00%Work Coefficient 2.03 1.97Flow Coefficient 0.44 0.46Stagnation-to-Static Pressure Ratio 1.94 1.96Solidity 0.97Aspect Ratio 1.25

Table 5.1: Turbine stage parameters, OTDF = 0.0

5.2.2 Boundary Conditions

The inlet boundary condition is held constant for the simulations with the TG-0% and

TG-2% configurations for a given hot streak strength. A two-dimensional distribution

of stagnation pressure, stagnation temperature, turbulent to laminar viscosity ratio,

and flow angle is specified at the turbine inlet in the r, 0 plane. At the outlet, the

static pressure at the hub is specified and the radial distribution of static pressure

that satisfies radial equilibrium is established by the solver. All walls have no slip

boundary conditions.

The measure used for hot streak strength in this thesis is the overall tempera-

ture distribution function (OTDF). The OTDF represents the difference between the

maximum temperature and the mass average temperature, non-dimensionalized by

the temperature rise across the combustor. The radial temperature distribution func-

tion (RTDF) is a non-dimensional circumferentially averaged temperature. OTDF

and RTDF are defined in Equations 5.1 and 5.2 respectively. The superscript M

denotes a mass average quantity, station 4 is the combustor-turbine interface and

station 3 is the compressor-combustor interface.

Tt,4 (r, 0) - TA'OTDF = max ' - (5.1)

r,o 0 Lt,4 -L t,3

58

Page 59: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

27r1 f Tt,4 (r, 0)- T^'d(RTDF - d (5.2)

270 T4 -T,3

The cases analyzed with CFD are shown in Table 5.2 denoted by x's. The

OTDF denotes the inlet boundary condition as defined in Equation 5.1. The case of

OTDF = 0.0 can be regarded as a baseline case with uniform inlet stagnation tem-

perature and is sometimes referred to as the reference state denoted by the subscript

0.

OTDFRANSURANS

Table 5.2: CFD inlet

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6x X x xx X X

boundary conditions and solver

For this study, a single temperature profile was used, scaled about T by varying

OTDF. For all cases it was assumed that the OTDF is twice the maximum RTDF

value, a representative approximation at the combustor-turbine interface. Figure 5-3

shows the radial temperature profile with RTDF and min/max temperature distri-

butions overlaid for the OTDF = 0.6 case. The peak value of temperature occurs

at approximately mid-span and corresponds to OTDF = 0.6. The peak RTDF also

occurs at mid-span and corresponds to RTDF - 0.3.

Figure 5-4 shows the non-dimensional stagnation temperature profile at the combustor-

turbine interface over the domain of two vanes (10 degrees). This temperature profile,

scaled about Td by OTDF, is utilized for all cases in the following study.

Figure 5-5 displays the circumferential clocking2 of the hot streak at mid-span.

The hot streak impinges the leading edge and the majority of the hot streak travels

on the pressure surface to permit effective cooling. The figure also identifies the vane

to hot streak ratio as 2:1. The clocking configuration shown is used for all the cases

explored here.

The inlet stagnation pressure is taken as uniform. Heat addition may be approx-

imated as a steady frictionless flow with the changes in stagnation pressure given

2Circumferential position of hot streak relative to vane leading edge

59

Page 60: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

I

0.8

-eQN

0z

0.6 -

0.4 -

0.21-

-0.9 -0.6 -0.3 0 0.3(T - T, 3)/(T,4 - T,3 )

0.61

-1.2 0.9

Figure 5-3: Circumferentially averaged inlet temperature distribution, OTDF = 0.6

-2.5 0 2.5Circumferential Position [deg]

Figure 5-4: Inlet temperature profile, OTDF = 0.6

by

dpt _y M2 dT

Pt 2 T)

If M 2 < 1, the stagnation pressure changes are small and pt can be approximated

as uniform. Steady CFD calculations were conducted where the hub and casing

boundary layers each extended into 40% of the flow and it was found that the hot

streak sensitivity only increased by 7%. The weak dependence combined with the

low Mach numbers in the combustor support the use of a uniform inlet stagnation

60

-/ /

RTDF-- Min and Max /

110

1

0.75

0.5

0.25

01

-eQt

P4

0

0-0.50-0.25

0.000.50

- 0 .0 00 .2 5- 0 .2 5

5

(5.3)

'

5

Page 61: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

-0.3

Figure 5-5: OTDF contour, circumferential clocking of the hot streak

pressure.

5.2.3 Unsteady Phase Averaging

The unsteady calculations utilize phase-lag boundary conditions at the circumferential

bounds of the computational domain and retain the first seven temporal harmonics of

the solution. The flow is periodic over one-half a revolution and, due to computational

restrictions, a method to reduce the time period used in the time-averaging process

is necessary.

The isentropic efficiency for a turbine is defined as

ht, 1 - ht,2(54r/ = ,(5.4)

ht, 1 - ht,2sl

where ht,2, is the ideal exit enthalpy for an isentropic process occurring between the

inlet stagnation pressure and temperature and exit stagnation pressure of the turbine.

Station 1 is the inlet and station 2 is the exit. Figure 5-6 shows an evaluation of

Equation 5.4 in the time domain for a turbine where OTDF = 0.4. Figure 5-6 shows

61

Page 62: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

a full revolution of the turbine with red and blue lines representing separate half

revolutions to convey the temporal convergence. The unsteady efficiency is compared

to the mixing plane efficiency (77steady) for the same turbine.

3-

2-

0-

-2-

-30 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

Revolutions

Figure 5-6: Instantaneous efficiency over two cycles, OTDF = 0.4

The unsteady efficiency in Figure 5-6 has a dominant mode with frequency, 18/rev,

that scales with OTDF. This oscillation is caused by unsteady chopping of the hot

streak by the blade and a subsequent oscillation in T, 2 as the hot streak exits the

computational domain. The black line in Figure 5-6 is a moving average with an

averaging period of 27r/18Q where 27r/Q is the period of revolution and Q is the

rotational frequency. The moving average removes the hot streak induced amplitude

but retains the time averaged mean. The moving average (black line in Figure 5-6)

has a low frequency oscillation (27r/4 Q) and an amplitude of 0.15%.

A power spectrum of an instantaneous evaluation of Equation 5.4 is given in Figure

5-7. The peaks describe the amplitude of the unsteady modes in Figure 5-6. Figure

5-7 shows that the dominant frequencies in the efficiency are multiples of the vane

count, the hot streak count, and at a lower magnitude, a low frequency harmonic

with four cycles per revolution.

The time averaging methodology is now described. Time averaging of quantity

62

Page 63: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

1.5RTDF = 0.2

_RTDF = 0.1RTDF = 0.0

0.5

00 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Vane Frequency 2irf /Q N,

Figure 5-7: Power spectrum of instantaneous efficiency

A (t) where A(t) is periodic over time interval T is defined as

A= lin A' (t ) dt' = A (t ) dt. (5.5 )0 0

The proposed averaging method reduces T from one half of a revolution to one sixth

of a revolution. As shown in Figure 5-6 the quantity is filtered with a moving average

over period 27r/18 Q , the hot streak period. The resulting moving averaged efficiency

has an amplitude of 0.15% over a periodicity of 2 7r/4 Q. Finally, a sinusoidal regres-

sion of the moving averaged efficiency yields the time-averaged value of the original

quantity.

5.3 Generalized Efficiency Definition for Unsteady

Non-Uniform Flows

At a snapshot in an unsteady flow, enthalpy is not conserved between the inlet and

exit; there are changes in energy (unsteady energy equation has dE/dt) within the

control volume. Over time period, T, the unsteady term time averages to zero and

63

Page 64: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

the power and ideal power can be expressed as a function of the inlet and exit fluxes.

The time averaged power extracted by the turbine over the period is defined by

Equation 5.6.

Power = (Th T M - T2 rM) dt (5.6)

If the exit pressure is approximately constant, the ideal power can be defined by

an isentropic expansion from the inlet stagnation temperature and pressure to the exit

stagnation pressure. This is shown in Equation 5.7 where wa denotes work averaging

and X denotes mixed out averaging.

Cp T M T ( X

Ideal Power T T, 1 t,2 dt (5.7)

Work average stagnation pressure, pfa, has been presented by Cumptsy and Hor-

lock [2] who defined it as

p a [ f A (T _ d. (5.8)

The work averaged stagnation pressure conserves work output across the stage

between the non-uniform flow and the average. The mixed out average represents

the state of the flow after fully mixing out to a uniform state in a constant area,

adiabatic, and frictionless duct.

The time averaged efficiency definition based on Equations 5.6 and 5.7 is then the

power divided by the ideal power.

f T rh TAI TMr,) dt(59

-1 2 T dt1h T wa dt

The two conclusions from Equation 5.9 are the use of the work average and the

mixed out average in the stagnation pressure ratio. The definition in this equation is

64

Page 65: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

referred to as the mixed-work efficiency. The definition is essentially a work-averaged

efficiency with the exit state defined as a mixed out condition so that exit length of the

domain is removed from the sensitivity, i.e. the turbine is penalized for downstream

mixing.

5.4 Effect of Tip Gap and Hot Streak on Efficiency

The drop in efficiency of a turbine when subjected to a hot streak is quantified by

rq(OTDF) - 7, where q, is the efficiency with uniform inlet stagnation temperature

(OTDF = 0.0). Figure 5-8, which utilizes the efficiency definition in Equation 5.9,

shows a comparison of the efficiency for all the cases listed in Table 5.2. The y-axis

represents the change in efficiency from the value at OTDF = 0.0. In the range of

OTDF = 0.2 to OTDF = 0.6, the turbine with no tip gap is 2.5 times more sensitive

to inlet hot streak strength and decreases by approximately 3% per OTDF.

0.5

0

-0.5

IN

1.5 -- TG-O% Steady- TG-2% Steady- - - TG-2% Unsteady

-20 0.2 0.4 0.6

OTDF

Figure 5-8: Hot streak sensitivity for TG-0% and TG-2%

Figure 5-8 indicates that there is only a small difference in the hot streak sensitivity

between unsteady CFD and steady CFD with a mixing plane. Additionally, the stage

efficiency increases by approximately 0.3 points.

65

Page 66: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

Figure 5-8 confirms that stage efficiency decreases with increasing hot streak

strength and it also presents a new finding; the turbine with no tip clearance has

a higher hot streak sensitivity than the turbine with a 2% tip clearance. Chapter

6 examines this result and highlights tip leakage mixing losses as the cause for the

difference in hot streak sensitivity.

66

Page 67: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

Chapter 6

Hot Streak Loss Mechanisms and

Utility of Entropy as a Turbine Loss

Metric

6.1 Introduction

This chapter discusses two mechanisms that create the different hot streak sensitivities

for the turbines with and without tip clearance. The topic of entropy generation as

a metric for lost work and the choice of an appropriate efficiency is also addressed.

" The choice of a mixed-work efficiency is compared to various other definitions.

* The difference in hot streak sensitivity is linked to a decrease in tip leakage

mass flow and associated tip leakage mixing losses. This is due to reduced

blade loading near the tip.

" An efficient turbine will decrease in efficiency from an entropy generation source

more than an inefficient turbine because of the nonlinear relationship between

efficiency and loss generation. This effect accounts for 15% of the hot streak

sensitivity difference between geometries.

67

Page 68: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

6.2 Spatial Averaging and Efficiency

In this section we describe the effect of efficiency definition on computed efficiency

and the use of viscous mixing losses as a measure for lost work.

For a one-dimensional, adiabatic, steady control volume, the second law of ther-

modynamics takes the form

r si - m s 2 + irr = 0. (6.1)

The term, Sirr, is the control volume integral of local volumetric entropy generation

and represents the overall entropy generation within control volume V.

Sirr = J dV (6.2)

V

In Equation 6.1 stations 1 and 2 here denote the inlet and exit of the turbine

respectively. For an ideal gas, the entropy at the exit may be related to the stagnation

temperature and stagnation pressure at the outlet and a reference state by

2 = cln - R In ( 2 . (6.3)\ t,ef / \ Pt,ref /

When Sirr = 0, s1 = S2. For a given exit and reference stagnation pressure, the

inlet entropy may be expressed as a function of the exit pressure and an isentropic

exit temperature, T, 2,.

Si = cP ln ( Tt,2) R In (Pt'2 (6.4)

Combining Equations 6.1, 6.3, and 6.4 the reference state cancels out as shown in

Equation 6.5 which is an expression for the isentropic exit temperature of the control

volume. Equation 6.5 expresses the minimum stagnation temperature at the outlet

of the control volume for an isentropic process given the calculated exit temperature

from CFD and the total entropy generation in the control volume. The expression

relates the non-isentropic process with nonzero Sirr and exit temperature, T, 2, to a

68

Page 69: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

representative isentropic process with zero Sirr and exit temperature, Tt,2,-

Tt,2= T, 2 exp - . - (6.5)m cp

Equations 6.4 and 6.3 may also be equated (Si = S2) to express the isentropic exit

total temperature as an ideal expansion from the inlet stagnation temperature and

pressure to the outlet stagnation pressure.

T -,2, = T,1 (6.6)\Pt'iJ

In conclusion, the isentropic exit temperature may be represented as a function

of either entropy generation in the domain or the expansion ratio and inlet tem-

perature. These two definitions are equivalent for the one-dimensional case. For

multi-dimensional flow, proper averaging of the inlet and outlet must be employed.

The following section addresses averaging methods, conserved quantities, and the

effect of efficiency definition on the calculated hot streak sensitivity.

6.2.1 Averaging Non-Uniform Flow

We now address different averaging methods for use in Equation 6.6 and quantify the

effect of averaging definition on calculated hot streak sensitivity.

Mass Averaging

Although often used in averaging stagnation pressure, this use has no physical basis

for flows where stagnation temperature is not uniform. Mass averaging stagnation

temperature flux conserves stagnation enthalpy and is defined as

Tm =-J T di (6.7)

A

denoted by a M superscript.

69

Page 70: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

Mixed Out Averaging

Mixed out averaging describes a process where the flow is regarded as undergoing a

mixing process to a uniform state. In this thesis, the term mixed out denotes the

process of mixing out in a constant area duct with no wall shear stress and no heat

addition. Conservation of mass, momentum, and energy on a control volume basis

uniquely define the exit mixed out conditions. This averaging process penalizes the

turbine for all downstream entropy generation despite the potential for attenuation

by downstream components. Although mixed-out averaging at the exit provides a

lower bound on efficiency magnitude, hot streak sensitivity is a measure of changes

in a efficiency and not efficiency magnitude.

It is sometimes the practice to use a mixed out average for both inlet and outlet

in the efficiency definition in Equation 6.6. If the inlet has uniform stagnation pres-

sure and non-uniform stagnation temperature, the mixed out inlet will have a lower

stagnation pressure than the actual uniform value. Using a mixed out average at the

inlet implies the turbine cannot take advantage of work lost through the inlet mixing

process. This lost work, scales with inlet OTDF and reduces the calculated hot streak

sensitivity.

Work Averaging

Work averaging defines an average stagnation pressure and stagnation temperature

that provide the same work output as a non-uniform flow exiting at a specified uni-

form exit stagnation pressure. The appropriate average stagnation temperature is

the mass-average temperature to conserve enthalpy. The work averaged stagnation

pressure is specified in Equation 6.8 [2].

L fATtdm (6.8)Pt -- 1

fATtIpC dm _

Conceptually, work-averaging denotes a process where the flow is separated into

differential streams that are isentropically expanded to a pressure, pa, such that

70

Page 71: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

the mass average total temperature of the two states are equal. In other words the

work output from isentropic expansion of the high pressure differential streams is

equal in magnitude to the work input from isentropic compression of the low pressure

differential streams.

Availability Averaging

Availability averaging (denoted by aa) conserves both availability and enthalpy flux

of the non-uniform flow, and hence conserves entropy flux. The definition is given in

Equation 6.9, in which T" is the mass average total temperature.

11 7y Tp" = exp -- In pt dm-- In (h) dh (6.9)Pt ln Pt- drIii_ A .

For a uniform stagnation pressure, the availability averaged stagnation pressure

may be larger than the uniform value if the stagnation temperature is non-uniform.

The additional stagnation pressure represents the work potential for a reversible

Carnot cycle that operates between the temperature difference at the inlet.

6.2.2 Effect of Efficiency Definition on Computed Turbine Stage

Sensitivity

The following addresses the choice of definition for T2,,, the enthalpy associated with

an isentropic process occurring through the turbine. Several definitions of Tt,2, are

used to evaluate the variation of efficiency with respect to the ideal exit temperature

definition. The importance of conserved quantities and appropriate efficiency defini-

tion is highlighted and the work average efficiency definition leads to examination of

viscous dissipation in the turbine blade row.

Table 6.1 presents four definitions using the preceding averages. The inlet stagna-

tion pressure is uniform for the problem addressed and thus ptj= p'. The entropy

efficiency is defined in Equation 6.5. The mixed-work as defined in Equation 5.9 is

the recommended metric.

71

Page 72: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

IT,2s

Mass T, 1 (P" /Pt,1)Availability T, I(pt"/Pa)

Entropy T,2 exp[-S/Th cp]Mixed-Work T,1 (p/p )- 1/-

Table 6.1: Isentropic expansion temperature definitions

Evaluation of the efficiency for the two geometries is shown in Figure 6-1. The

figure shows the effect of T,2, definition as given in Table 6.1 on the computed hot

streak sensitivity for both turbine configurations.

0

-2 -

-2

-3 - Mass

_ 4 .EntropyAvailability

-5 - Mixed-Work

-6 TGO%-- - TG2%

0 0.2 0.4 0.6OTDF

Figure 6-1: Hot streak sensitivity as a function of efficiency definition

In Figure 6-1, the x-axis represents hot streak strength and the y-axis represents

changes in efficiency with respect to the baseline case with uniform inlet stagnation

conditions. Solid lines are for TG-0% and dashed lines are for TG-2% with color

denoting the averaging used. Figure 6-1 shows that the availability and entropy

definitions are approximately equivalent and yield the highest hot streak sensitivities.

The availability definition preserves entropy flux and for the case of adiabatic walls,

is equal to the entropy definition. The entropy definition includes both the viscous

entropy generation and thermal entropy generation components.

72

Page 73: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

It will be seen that only viscous mixing losses should be analyzed in turbine

component design. The entropy and availability definitions thus have a disconnect

with effects a designer has control over. The mass average efficiency under predicts

the sensitivity by approximately 32%.

The mixed-work efficiency is advantageous as it utilizes both a work averaged inlet

and a mixed out average at the exit and thus conserves work extraction across the

stage. This definition follows on from the definition developed by Miller [14] but is

altered where the exit plane is defined as fully mixed out.

6.3 Results

6.3.1 Entropy Generation Rate

The entropy production rate can be decomposed into two separate parts, thermal

dissipation (i.e. heat transfer across a finite temperature difference) and viscous

dissipation. Both represent lost work, with the thermal mixing representing work that

could be achieved by Carnot cycles operating between a finite temperature difference.

The two parts are given in Equations 6.10 and 6.11 expressed as entropy generation

rates per unit volume. In Equation 6.10, v denotes a process related to viscosity and

pteff is the effective viscosity from the SA turbulence model. In Equation 6.11, th

denotes thermal, k is the thermal conductivity, and pt is the turbulent viscosity from

the SA turbulence model.

F 2 / \2 2 / \2

Ou 8W 82 + W 2 2 Ou Ov Ow 2

+ + + + + (6.10)OZ OX 09z Oy 3 Ox Oy Oz)

th k+cp40.9 OT T2 + OT T2 T 2T2 Ox Oy OZ

73

Page 74: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

The entropy production rates are locally defined but Equation 6.2 is used to relate

the rate of local entropy generation within the control volume to the total rate of

entropy generation.

The total entropy production can be further separated into control volumes for

vane and rotor domains. The dividing line is defined as the inter-stage plane halfway

between the vane trailing edge and the rotor leading edge. The total entropy pro-

duction in each control volume is shown as a function of OTDF in Figure 6-2 and

6-3. The y-axis represents changes in the entropy generation rate with respect to the

baseline OTDF = 0.0 case.

0.06 -TG-0% Vane

0.05 - - - TG-2% VaneTG-0% Rotor,1 0.04-TG-2% Rotor

0.03 -

U 0.02-

0.01 -

0

-0.010 0.2 0.4 0.6

OTDF

Figure 6-2: Viscous entropy generation rate within control volume

The work averaged efficiency definition may be written as a function of the viscous

dissipation in the control volume as shown in Equation 6.12 [14]. There exists a

thermal creation term in the denominator of Equation 6.12 that has been identified

by Miller [141 but it is shown that this term is of negligible importance for the problem

of interest here.

Power (6.12)Power + fff vdV (6.12

74

Page 75: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

0.06-

0.05 TG-0% Vane- - TG-2% Vane

0.04 . TG-0% Rotor- - TG-2% Rotor

0.03 /

0.02 -

0.01 -

E4 0

-0.010 0.2 0.4 0.6

OTDF

Figure 6-3: Thermal entropy generation rate within control volume

The thermal mixing term, whose magnitude is given by Figure 6-3, does not appear in

the denominator of Equation 6.12. When performing component design, the viscous

mixing losses can be altered by changes in the design whereas the thermal mixing of

the inlet temperature gradients is seen as an inevitable loss. This topic is still being

debated in the literature 119] and requires further inquiring, but that is beyond the

scope of this thesis. When examining turbine efficiency in this thesis we thus use the

definition of Equation 6.12 and only viscous mixing losses are included.

The y-axis in Figure 6-2 thus shows the changes in the denominator of Equation

6.12, representing either increases or decreases in lost work. The increase seen in the

viscous terms as a function of OTDF is directly linked to the hot streak sensitivity.

Using Equation 6.12, the hot streak sensitivity can be evaluated by examining

changes in S,. Figure 6-2 shows that generation of viscous losses in the turbine rotor

decrease in magnitude for TG-2% relative to TG-0%. As the hot streak strength

increases, associated viscous mixing losses increase in the passage but there is re-

duced viscous mixing losses for the case with a finite tip gap. This reduction in

viscous mixing losses describes the difference in hot streak sensitivity between the

two geometries.

75

Page 76: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

6.3.2 Blade Incidence Angle

At the inlet to the computational domain, the endwalls are parallel (see Figure 5-2)

and the inlet boundary condition specifies parallel flow. For a constant stagnation

pressure inlet with parallel streamlines, the Mach number will also be uniform. The

axial velocity is thus

Ux = M V R T = .1 V/' R T f (- , M/). (6.13)

Ux c X/ (6.14)

At the inlet, the hot streak has a higher axial velocity than the surrounding cold

fluid. At the vane exit, the Mach number is approximately the same for the hot and

cold streams so the velocity difference will increase. At the interstage plane there

is thus a velocity non-uniformity with approximately aligned flow in the stationary

reference frame. However, in the relative reference frame, the hot streak has increased

incidence seen by the rotor. The loading will be reduced for regions where the fluid

is colder than the mass averaged value. Figure 6-4 shows the rotor incidence angle

for OTDF cases of 0.0 and 0.6 for the 2% configuration.

At 95% span, where the fluid is colder than the mass average, the incidence angle

is reduced by 140 for OTDF = 0.6. This reduces loading of the rotor at the hub and

tip. The static pressure distribution for TG-2% at 95% span is shown in Figure 6-5

for the same two OTDF values as in Figure 6-4. A reduction in the loading of the

blade tip region can be seen which is due to the hot streak.

6.3.3 Tip Leakage Massflow

We now examine the tip leakage flow in the TG-2% geometry. A reduction in tip

loading (pressure difference) implies a reduction in tip leakage mass flow rate and tip

leakage losses. Figure 6-6 shows the tip leakage flow as a fraction of the main stream

flow rate versus OTDF. There is a reduction in physical tip leakage mass flow by

76

Page 77: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

0.8 -

0.6 -

0.4 -

0.2 OTDF = 0.0, TG-2%- - OTDF = 0.6, TG-2%

20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55Relative Flow Angle [deg]

Figure 6-4: Interstage rotor relative incidence angle

10.5% as OTDF goes from 0.0 to 0.6.

6.3.4 Tip Gap Loss Scaling

We now examine the different loss generation terms and their scaling with OTDF

and tip gap. Tip gap loss (also referred to as Gap in Figure 6-7) in this context is

defined as the entropy generation that occurs within the tip gap. The tip leakage flow

mixing loss is defined as the loss incurred by mixing of the tip leakage flow with the

mainstream flow.

Figure 6-7 from Huang I7] presents a decomposition of the entropy generation

terms for a similar turbine design with tip gaps of 0% and 2%. In Figure 6-7 the

y-axis, , is defined as

Tt,2 As( = ' ,(6.15)Aht

a non-dimensional loss metric. The rotor geometry in this thesis and Huang's is the

same from 0% to 50%. Figure 6-7 indicates the order of magnitude of the different

loss components for a similar turbine. The primary differences between the two

77

I

Page 78: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

0.7

0.75

0.5

OTDF =0.0- - OTDF= 0.6

0.250 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

X/cX

Figure 6-5: Pressure contour at 95% span, TG-2%

geometries in Figure 6-7 is the existence of a tip gap loss and a more importantly,

a loss associated with the tip leakage flow mixing with the mainstream in the upper

half of the span. The latter effect accounts for the majority of the difference seen in

the total viscous loss.

Figure 6-8 shows the scaling of losses within the tip gap with respect to OTDF

for the TG-2% geometry defined in this thesis. Figure 6-8 shows that losses in the

tip gap reduce by 11.5% at an OTDF of 0.6, a result of the 10.5% reduction in tip

mass flow in Figure 6-6. More importantly, Figure 6-7, shows that the contribution

of tip gap losses is small compared to mixing losses in the upper half span. In the

TG-2% configuration, tip gap losses contribute just 12% of the overall loss. Our focus

is thus on the tip flow leakage mixing loss which represents a larger influence on stage

efficiency and hot streak sensitivity.

Denton describes a control volume model for mixing out of tip leakage flow in a

mainstream flow [3] which is applicable when pressure gradients in the mainstream are

small. A scaling conclusion from the control volume analysis is that the mixing losses

scale with the non-dimensionalized mass flow rate of the tip leakage flow, ritip/rmain.

As shown in Figure 6-7, the difference in entropy generation between TG-0% and

78

Page 79: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

5.4

5.2-

5 --

4.8

4.60 0.2 0.4 0.6

OTDF

Figure 6-6: Tip leakage mass flow rate reduction with OTDF

TG-2% is attributed to losses imposed by the finite tip gap. We can scale the tip

leakage flow mixing losses by mhtip/mmrnain as an estimate of change in tip leakage

mixing losses. Figure 6-9 shows the variation in efficiency with OTDF using the

scaling for tip leakage flow mixing losses and the calculated tip gap losses. Figure 6-9

shows modifications to the TG-2% efficiency curve to approximate the TG-0% curve.

Correction 1 denotes the removal of the tip leakage mixing loss calculated using the

Denton scaling argument. Correction 2 denotes the removal of both the tip leakage

mixing loss and the calculated tip gap losses. Figure 6-9 confirms the hypothesis that

losses in the tip gap have a small contribution. The tip gap losses and tip leakage

mixing losses captures 82% of the hot streak sensitivity difference seen between the

two geometries, a 205% increase in hot streak sensitivity from TG-2% to TG-0%.

6.3.5 Efficiency Sensitivity to Inlet Hot Streak

The hot streak sensitivity is different for the two turbine geometries due to different

amounts of viscous entropy production in the two geometries, but the efficiency is

also non-linearly related to entropy generation and thus the hot streak sensitivity

79

Page 80: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

0.12

0.1

0.08

4 0.06 00% clearance

M2% clearance0.04 --

0.02

0Total Viscous Gap Blade + Hub Lower Half Upper Half

Loss Freestream Freestream

Figure 6-7: Turbine stage loss components

varies with the reference efficiency, r, of the turbine. The efficiency is defined as a

function of non-dimensional entropy generation, T, 2 S/rhAht, in Equation 6.16. We

wish to quantify the sensitivity of rT to entropy production at different values of S

and describe how the efficiency will change with an additional loss source, A5..

1r7' 1 (6.16)

1+ Tt,2 svh Aht

If we assume that the viscous loss scaling is independent of tip clearance, we

can determine a relationship between the efficiency and the entropy generation when

OTDF = 0.0. In other words, we can view the inlet hot streak as a perturbation

from the baseline flow field and quantify the stage sensitivity for perturbations with

both TG-0% and TG-2%. Equation 6.17 decomposes the entropy generation into an

So term that represents the entropy generation for a given geometry at OTDF = 0.0

and a perturbation in viscous mixing losses due to by the inlet hot streak, Alc.

= (6.17)1 + S0 +ASv

Tv Aht

Taking the first derivative with respect to Al5, evaluated at OTDF = 0.0, we find

80

Page 81: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

U

-5

-10

-150 0.2 0.4 0.6

OTDF

Figure 6-8: Entropy generation in the tip gap, TG-2%

1c- 2.(6.18)

d (A,) OTDF=O ( O 1)m

T4Aht

Equation 6.18 states that the sensitivity of turbine efficiency to a loss perturbation

scales with 1/502, so a turbine stage with a higher efficiency is more sensitive to

increases in viscous dissipation than a stage with a lower efficiency.

Figure 6-10 shows a curve of efficiency, ij, versus non-dimensional entropy gen-

eration, T, 2 S/rhAht, based on Equation 6.16. The two curves include the linear

assumption for high efficiency turbines and the efficiency definition in Equation 6.16.

The slope of the curve in Figure 6-10 shows the change in efficiency for a given change

in entropy generation. Figure 6-10 shows that a more efficient stage will change effi-

ciency more than an inefficient stage.

For the two turbines in this study, the difference in ro and thus efficiency sensitivity

to perturbations in viscous dissipation accounts for 15% of the difference in hot streak

sensitivity between TG-0% and TG-2%. This effect is relatively small and thus the

reduction in tip leakage mixing losses associated with blade loading is identified as

the dominant mechanism.

81

Page 82: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

N ~.

-- TG-O%TG-2%

- - - TG-2% Correction 1- - - TG-2% Correction 2

0.2

N'NN N''NNN.N

N NNN N

NN

0.4 0.6OTDF

Figure 6-9: Efficiency with control volume model correction

100

90

80

70

60

500 0.25 0.5

-T, 2 S/IT Ah0.75 1

Figure 6-10: Efficiency sensitivity to entropy production

82

0

-0.5

-1

1.5

-20

1/(1 + T, 2 $/Aht)- - 1-T, 2 S/Ah .

-4

Page 83: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

Chapter 7

Summary, Conclusions, and

Recommendations for Future Work

7.1 Summary and Conclusions

Turbine stage performance dependence on inlet non-uniformities has been assessed

through two model problems, upstream wake attenuation and hot streak effects on

turbine efficiency. A combination of two-dimensional and three-dimensional, RANS

and URANS, calculations have been used.

7.1.1 Reversible Wake Attenuation

" An upstream wake was represented as vorticity convected by a steady back-

ground flow. The geometric distortion of the wake, Kelvin's theorem, and a ID

distribution of infinitesimal control volumes along the wake was used to esti-

mate the evolution of wake velocity defect in the turbine passage. Reversible

wake attenuation of the 46% was seen.

" The process of wake attenuation in a turbine is different than for a compressor

because, velocity gradients normal to the wake orientation deform the wake,

i.e. wake segments do not remain straight. An inviscid attenuation of 74% was

demonstrated for a representative geometry with unsteady CFD. It was also

83

Page 84: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

shown that the wake can increase in stagnation pressure above the freestream

near the pressure surface if the wake is turned such that the velocity defect

vector points downstream.

e Two-dimensional unsteady calculations identify two wake attenuation mecha-

nisms. Bowing and turning of the segments can reorient the velocity defect

from pointing upstream to downstream, decreasing or increasing the wake flow-

through time compared to freestream. Wake segments in a turbine are not

purely stretched or compressed as can be approximated for a compressor. The

unsteady pressure field in the relative coordinate system can also provide work

extraction from the wake relative to the freestream in the passage.

7.1.2 Effects of Hot Streaks on Turbine Stage Efficiency

* Steady three-dimensional RANS calculations have shown that blade loading

near the tip and thus tip leakage flow rate, are the primary cause for different

hot streak sensitivity between a turbine geometry with a finite tip gap and one

with no tip gap.

" A numerical example is used to convey the importance of efficiency definition

for both steady and unsteady CFD with non-uniform inlets.

" The calculated efficiency sensitivity to inlet hot streak for a rotor with a tip

clearance is similar for steady CFD with a mixing plane and unsteady CFD

case with phase-lag boundary conditions.

* For the turbine geometry examined, a turbine rotor with a 2% clearance is

roughly twice as sensitive to hot streaks than the same rotor with no tip gap.

The difference in hot streak sensitivity is attributed to a reduction in tip leakage

mass flow and thus tip leakage mixing losses, compared to the rotor operating

without a hot streak.

" A turbine performance efficiency definition has been proposed for evaluating

turbine sensitivity to hot streaks. The efficiency definition utilizes a work-

84

Page 85: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

averaged inlet conditions and mixed out exit conditions to conserve enthalpy

flux and work output between the original three-dimensional unsteady flow field

and the averages.

7.2 Recommendations for Future Work

(i) A next step in the second research problem could be to augment the blade

count to permit sliding plane unsteady calculations of a similar geometry, i.e.

to change the rotor and vane count from 58 and 36 respectively to 54 and 36.

The geometry change reduces flow periodicity from one-half a revolution to one-

eighteenth. The reduced solution time permits time averaging of flow parameters

(e.g entropy generation and inlet flow angles) and further investigation of how

well mixing-plane calculations capture the unsteady three dimensional flow field.

(ii) The effect of an asymmetric vane row may also be evaluated. A proposed

design could include two vanes, one designed for hot streak impingement and

one designed for the neighbor vane without a hot streak. The spanwise turning

angle distribution could be designed such that the turning of the hot streak

aligns the relative flow angles exiting the vane row for vane with hot streak and

its neighboring vane without a hot streak. This reduces the unsteadiness of

the flow entering the rotor and permits a single point optimization of the rotor

rather than a robust design for the periodic alternating flow angle currently seen

at the rotor inlet.

(iii) The effect of swirl and corresponding radial migration should be analyzed.

Swirling flow at the inlet may be used to cause radial migrations towards the

hub in the vain and a reduction in hot streak ingestion at the rotor tip.

(iv) Finally, the convected wake analysis in a steady flow can be augmented with

a one-dimensional momentum equation to predict unsteady pressure variations

within the wake. Currently the model assumes that the pressure in the wake

is the same as the pressure in the freestream. A one-dimensional momentum

85

Page 86: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

equation may be included in the model which uses the velocity defect vector

variation and the freestream pressure to determine &p/&t in the wake. If the

model agrees with the unsteady calculations, the parameterization of reversible

wake attenuation can be used for design.

86

Page 87: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

Bibliography

[1] C. M. Cha, P. T. Ireland, P. A. Denman, and V. Savarianandam. Turbulencelevels are high at the combustor-turbine interface. Proceedings of ASME TurboExpo 2012, pages 1-20, 2012.

[2] N. A. Cumptsy and J. H. Horlock. Averaging nonuniform flow for a purpose.Journal of Turbomachinery, 128:120-129, 2005.

[3] J. D. Denton. Loss mechanisms in turbomachines. Journal of Turbomachinery,115:621-656, 1993.

[4] E. M. Greitzer, C. S. Tan, and M. B. Graf. Internal Flow: Concepts and Appli-cations. Cambridge University Press, 2004.

15] D. K. Hall. Performance limits of axial turbomachine stages. Master's thesis,Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astro-nautics, February 2011.

[6] H. P. Hodson and W. N. Dawes. On the interpretation of measured profile lossesin unsteady wake turbine blade interaction studies. Journal of Turbomachinery,120:276-284, 1998.

[7] A. Huang. Loss mechanisms in turbine tip clearance flows. Master's thesis, Mas-sachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics,May 2011.

[8] H. D. Joslyn, J. R. Caspar, and R. P. Dring. Inviscid modeling of turbomachinerywake transport. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2(2):175-180, 1986.

[9] S. C. Kacker and U. U. Okapuu. A mean line prediction method for axial flowturbine efficiency. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 104:111-119, 1982.

[10] J. L. Kerrebrock and A. A. Mikolajczak. Intra-stator transport of rotor wakesand its effect on compressor performance. Journal of Engineering for Power,92:359-368, 1970.

[11] B. Khanal, L. He, J. Northall, and P. Adami. Analysis of radial migrationof hot-streak in swirling flow through high-pressure turbine stage. Journal ofTurbomachinery, 135:1-11, 2013.

87

Page 88: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOLGY Turbine Inlet …

112] S. Mazur. Personal communication, 2014.

[13] R. X. Meyer. The effect of wakes on the transient pressure and velocity distri-butions in turbomachines. Journal of Basic Engineering, 80:1544-1552, 1958.

[141 R. J. Miller. Mechanical work potential. In Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo2013: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, pages 1-13, 2013.

[15] L. J. Pritchard. An eleven parameter axial turbine airfoil geometry model. InGas Turbine Conference and Exhibit, Houston, Texas, March 1985. AmericanSociety for Mechanical Engineers.

[16] T. Shang and A. H. Epstein. Analysis of hot streak effects on turbine rotor heatload. Journal of Turbomachinery, 119:544-553, 1997.

[17] L. H. Smith. Wake dispersion in turbomachines. Journal of Basic Engineering,88(3):688-690, 1966.

[181 L. H. Smith. Wake ingestion propulsion benefit. Journal of Propulsion andPower, 9(1):74-82, 1993.

[19] J. B. Young and J. H. Horlock. Defining the efficiency of a cooled turbine. Journalof Turbomachinery, 128:658-667, 2006.

[201 D. E. Van Zante, J. J. Adamczyk, A. J. Strazisar, and T. H. Okiishi. Wakerecovery performance benefit in a high-speed axial compressor. Journal of Tur-bomachinery, 124(2):275-284, 2002.

88


Recommended