26
Materials and Methods
Experiments for the present study were carried in commercial brackish
water shrimp ponds located near Gangapatnam, Nellore district, Andhra
Pradesh, India. An estuarine canal is passing near the ponds with continuous
supply of water throughout the year. All the ponds average size goes 0.5 hac
and rectangular in shape with clay loamy soil suitable for semi intensive type
of culture. Infrastructure facilities such as electricity, road, Water supply and
skilled labor were available for the ponds. Pump house with three 3H.P motors
and Generator (15KW) were also arranged in the farm area. Ponds were
designed and constructed with strong dykes having 1.5m avg. height to retain
min 1.0m avg. Water inlet system designed with PVC pipelines. Filter bags and
mesh were tied to the inlets for preventing the entry of pest and predators. 1.0m
width of sluice supported with wooden plank shutters were also constructed to
all the ponds for daily water exchange and draining. Paddle Wheel aerators
were placed in each pond. One pond was used as reservoir/treatment pond.
Before stocking with post larvae all the experimental ponds were treated
with pre-stocking management. Initially pond bottom was ploughed and top
soil was removed upto a depth of 10 cm for eliminating any black soil
deposition. Later it was allowed for complete drying. After 1 week pH of the
soil was tested for liming. Quick lime (Cao) and Dolomite (Ca Mg (Co3)2) were
uniformly distributed at the pond bottom and dykes at the rate of 1.5ton/hac
and 1ton/hac respectively to get the soil pH around 7.5. Organic carbon and
available Phosphorus and Nitrogen in the soil were also tested for further
fertilization. 10 kg bleaching powder was applied for preventing the pest and
predators. Raw cow dung 200 kg, Urea (5 kg) and triple superphosphate (20
kg) were also applied in each pond when the level of water was around 80cm.
Then all the ponds were completely filled. Transparency was checked with
Secchidisc before stocking the post larvae. This was common to all the
experiments in the present study.
27
Hatchery produced seed (Cp aqua. Pvt., Ltd., Nellore) were used in the
present study. Post larvae with an average size of 0.67g body wt. were used for
stocking in the experimental ponds. All the post larvae were equal in size and
free from disease. Before packing the post larvae were subjected to stress test
by 50% reduction in salinity and 100ppm formalin treatment to ascertain the
seed quality. Seed were also confirmed negative for Taura syndrome and White
spot syndrome virus in two step PCR assay. Seed were brought in oxygenated
poly ethylene bags filled 1/3 with filtered sea water and stocked @500 no/lit.
Thermocole boxes were used to prevent stress during transportation. Stocking
was done at early hours to avoid temperature stress. All the post larvae were
acclimatized before stocking into the ponds. All the bags were kept in pond
water and slowly water was allowed to mix in the bags for a period of 30
minutes to adjust with the pond temperature After the completion of
acclimatization Post larvae were released. Aeration was given with paddle
wheel aerators throughout the culture in all the experimental ponds. In first and
second experiments 10% water exchange was done for every fifteen days.
Shrimp were fed with supplemented feed twice a day morning 7am and
evening 5pm for the first week and later four times a day at 6am, 10am, 3pm
and 7pm. Crumble type feed was used in the first month of culture upto a size
of 2g. avg. body weight. Pellet type feed was used for the remaining period of
culture. Feeding rate was managed at 15% of the shrimp body weight for the
first month. Later it was maintained at 8% in the second month, 4% in the third
month and fourth month. Check trays were used for observing the daily feed
consumption of shrimp. Eight check trays were used in each pond to observe
the feed wastage. Sampling was done at every fortnight by Seine net for first
fifteen days and through cast net for the remaining culture period. Total no of
individuals and the average body weights were recorded in each sampling. Five
hauls were made in each pond for studying the growth performance of
L.vannamei with each sample containing 50-70 animals.
28
Plate-3.1
Fig.1: Nauplius of L.vannamei
Fig.2: Metanauplius of L.vannamei
29
Plate-3.2
Fig.1: Zoea-1 of L.vannamei
Fig.2: Zoea-2 of L.vannamei
30
Plate-3.3
Fig.1: Mysis of L.vannamei
Fig.2: Post larvae of L.vannamei
31
In the present study three experiments were carried for knowing the
survival and growth performance of shrimp L.vannamei with different stocking
densities, different feeds and probiotics. In the first experiment post larvae
stocked at a density of 20pcs/m² in pond (P1), 30pcs /m² in pond (P2), 40pcs
/m² in pond (P3), 50pcs /m² in pond (P4) and 60pcs /m² in pond (P5). In this
experiment only one type of feed was given to all the pods (Commercial feed).
Survival and growth performance of L.vannamei at different densities were
studied in this experiment.
In the second experiment post larvae were stocked at 45pcs/m² in all
the ponds. Three different feeds were used in this experiment. One is
Commercial feed (F1) and the other two were locally formulated feeds. Feed
(F2) is formulated by the available animal ingredients and Feed (F3) is
formulated by the plant ingredients. The animal ingredients and plant
ingredients were given (Table 3.1 and 3.2). The survival, growth performance
and biochemical analysis were studied in this experiment.
In the third experiment ponds were treated soil and water probiotics
Super Ps (5lit/0.5ha.) and Super biotic (5kg/0.5ha.) (Cp aqua. Pvt.Ltd,
Chennai). Water probiotic (Super biotic) was applied 5kg after 10hr
fermentation in 200liter water and broadcasted throughout the pond. Soil
probiotic super Ps was mixed with sand and broadcasted throughout the pond.
Feed probiotic (UB probizyme, Unique biotic Ltd. Hyderabad) was supplied
along with the formulated feeds (dose at 10g/kg). The application and dosage
of probotic in treatment ponds were followed according to the manufacturer’s
instructions. In this study shrimp survival, growth performance and
immunological studies were carried under the influence of probiotic
application.
Growth performance was studied by different growth parameters.
Average daily growth (ADG), Specific growth rate (SGR) and Feed conversion
ratio (FCR) was calculated and statistically analyzed (ANOVA). Final weight
32
gain%, Survival rate (SR) %, total feed consumption and total yield (Kg) were
estimated. The following growth parameters were used for studying the growth
performance of L.vannamei.
Growth parameters: Final weight (g) a. Average daily gain (g) = ------------------------------------ Duration of culture (days) Final Weight (g) – Initial Weight (g) b. Final Weight Gain % = --------------------------------------------- × 100 Initial Weight (g) Ln (Final weight (g) ) - ln (Initial weight (g) ) c. Specific growth rate = --------------------------------------------- × 100 Duration of culture (days) No of shrimp harvested d. Survival rate % = -------------------------------------------- × 100 No of shrimp stocked Total feed fed (dry wt.) (kg) e. Feed conversion ratio = ----------------------------------------------- Total yield (kg)
At the end of the second experiment shrimp whole body composition
were estimated for biochemical analysis of shrimp digestion. After harvesting
shrimp samples were collected from all the experimental treated and control
ponds. They were properly cleaned with distilled water and dried in hot air
oven at 60˚c for 48hr’s or until dry matter with a constant weight is reached.
The dried samples were taken and analyzed for Moisture, Crude protein, Crude
fat and Ash. Moisture was determined by Oven-drying at 105oC for 24h.
Crude protein was analyzed by the Kjeldahl method after acid digestion. Crude
lipid was analyzed by the other extraction method by Soxhlet system (AOAC,
1990).
In the third experiment Immunological studies were carried with
Haemolymph to know the effect of probiotic on shrimp health. Sampling was
done at the end of the experiment to compare between the control and probiotic
33
treated shrimp of three different fed ponds. Haemolymph was extracted from
the rosrtal sinus using specially designed sterile capillary tubes with diameter
of 0.5mm, pre-rinsed with anticoagulant. Anticoagulant was prepared from
0.01M Tris HCl, 0.25 M sucrose, 0.1 M trisodium citrate, Double distilled
water. They were autoclaved and adjusted to pH 7.6 (Song and Hsieh, 1994)
and transferred to a sterile micro centrifuge tube with cooled anticoagulant.
Total haemocyte count (THC) was made using a Neubauer improved
haemocytometer and expressed as THC/ ml haemolymph. Phenoloxidase (PO)
activity was measured spectrophotometrically by using L-3, 4-
dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) as the substrate (Soderhall, 1981). The
dopachrome formed was measured at 495 nm and phenoloxidase activity was
then expressed as the increase in absorbance per min per 100µl haemolymph.
Respiratory burst activity of hemocytes was measured spectrophotometrically
(Song and Hsieh, 1994) using nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) as the substrate.
Total protein in the Hemolymph was estimated as per Lowery et al. (1951)
using bovin serum albumin as standard after precipitating the hemolymph with
80% ethanol.
Hydrological studies:
Physico-chemical parameters were studied in all the ponds of the three experiments. They were measured by the standard methods and field instruments. Water temperature was measured in the pond itself by using a standard centigrade thermometer. Field test instruments were used to analyze water pH (Digital mini – pH meter, model 55) and dissolved oxygen (YSI-58). Transparency was measured in terms of light penetration method using secchidisc (Boyd, 1990). Salinity was measured with refractometer (Japan). Water samples were taken weekly for analyzing the other physico-chemical parameters in all the ponds using standard methods (APHA, 1989). Total ammonia (APHA, 1989), Nitrate – Nitrogen (Boyd, 1984), and total alkalinity & Hardness (APHA, 1989) were analyzed by the standard protocols.
Sample collection: Water samples were taken randomly from ponds weekly and
sampler from at least five spots in each experimental pond between 9.00am to
34
4.30pm at a depth of 30cm below the water surface. The samples were mixed
together in a plastic container and analyzed for water parameters.
Analytical methods used for calculation of other parameters.
Total ammonia concentration was measured by Hach comparison
apparatus following the method reported by APHA, (1989), and the Deionized
ammonia (NH3) was calculated from total ammonia according to Boyd (1990).
Nitrate-nitrogen was measured by phenoldisulphonic acid method according to
Boyd (1984). Colour readings were measured with the spectrophotometer
(Milton roy 21D model) at 410 nm wave length. Total alkalinity and total
hardness were measured by titration according to APHA (1985).
Experimental feeds:
Feed1 (F1): The commercial feed selected for the experiments in the present
study was supplied by the company Cp Aqua. Pvt., Ltd., Chennai. The feed
was used in crumble form for the first month and pellet form in the next three
months. Ingredients of the feed was Fish meal, Shrimp head meal, Squid meal,
Soya bean, Cod liver, broken rice, wheat flour, cholesterol, phospholipids,
vitamins and minerals.
Feed (F2): It was prepared locally from the available ingredients of animal
based protein i.e Squilla meal, Shrimp meal, Chicken liver, Snail foot, Earth
worm meal, Cholesterol, Vitamins and minerals.
Feed (F3): It was also prepared locally from the available ingredients of plant
based protein i.e Groumd nut cake, Heated soya bean, Corn gluten, Pea meal,
Rice bran, Wheat flour, Corn starch, Soy oil, Cholesterol, Vitamin and
minerals.
Equipments and technical procedure used in the feed preparation:
1. Weighing scale 2. Sieve 3. Grinde 4. Mixer 5. Steamer 6. Pelletiser 7. Oven
35
All the ingredients used in the feeds were properly dried and made into
homogenized mixture by grinding into a particulate size. All the powdered
ingredients were properly weighed and mixed according to the selected feed
formulae. Then the ingredients were steamed with water in a steamer for about
fifteen minutes for improving the digestibility of the feed and also to destroy
the microorganisms.Then the cooked material was cooled and mixed with
vitamin& minerals.Finally feed was extruded through a Pelletiser and sundried.
Table: 3.1 Animal based ingredients of feed2 (F2)
Table: 3.2 Plant based ingredients of Feed3 (F3)
Ingredient Percentage
Ground nut cake 35%
Heated Soya bean 22.70%
Corn gluten 15.20%
pea meal 8.50%
Rice bran 8.20%
Wheat flour 4.50%
Corn starch 0.9%
Vitamin & mineral mix 2.80%
Soy oil 1.30%
Cholesterol 0.90%
Ingredient Percentage
Squilla meal 28.50%
Shrimp meal 27.60%
Chicken Liver 21.50%
Snail foot 13.86%
Earth warm meal 11.86%
Vitamin & mineral mix 2.40%
Cholestrol 1.20%
36
Table - 3.3: Proximate composition of experimental feeds
Nutrients Feed (F1)
(commercial)
Feed (F2)
(Animal based)
Feed (F3)
(plant based)
Crude protein 37.29% 36.39% 36.15%
Total lipid 5.23% 6.5% 7.2%
Fibre 4.57% 4.12% 4.42%
Moisture 12.25% 18.72% 19.20%
Ash 13.71% 15.95% 16.12%
Probiotics Soil probiotic:
Super Ps – For bottom soil quality management 10liltre of Supre Ps was mixed in 50kg dry sand and broadcasted throughout the pond during morning hours with an interval of 15 days.
Water probiotic:
Super biotic – For water quality management 1.5kg of super biotic mixed with 200litre water and fermented under aeration for 8hr’s. It was broadcasted throughout the pond during morning hours in an interval of 15 days.
(Soil and water probiotic were supplied by the Cp aquaculture Pvt. Ltd.)
Feed probiotic:
UB probizyme - It is an unique blended probiotic with enzymes, vitamins and mineral complex mixed and given along with the feed every day at 10g/kg feed.
37
Composition: 4.3×105million CFU/kg (Lactobacillus sporogenes, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bacillus Subtillis, Bacillus Licheniformis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae )
(Feed probiotic was supplied by UNIQUE biotec Pvt. Ltd.)
Harvesting
Shrimp were harvested after completion of 120 days of culture. One day before harvesting all feed inputs was stopped. One third of water from each pond was drained through outlet just before catching. Two third of the quantity was collected through outflow and remaining was handpicked. Shrimp were immediately transferred to the cleaning tubs provided near the pond. They were rinsed and chilled before packing. Random samples were collected during the weighing process for determining the individual weight. Mean final weight, were calculated by using the Individual weights. After quantifying the biomass mean final yield, feed conversion ratio and survival were calculated. Specific growth rate, average daily gain and Final weight gain % were determined using the standard formula.
Statistical analysis
To know the significant difference between the results Student t-test
(Fisher’s) and ANOVA were applied. Student t-test was applied for comparing
single factor and ANOVA was used for comparing multiple factors. All the
Data were expressed in the mean ± standard error. The results of Average daily
gain (ADG), Specific growth rate (SGR) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were
subjected to ANOVA analysis. Total haemocyte count (THC), Phenoloxidase
(PO) value and Nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) were also analyzed using one way
analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s multiple comparison of the
means using SPSS 10.0 for Windows. According to Steel and Torrie (1980) the
significant differences among treatments were performed using f- factor
analysis at a level of P ≤ 0.05 significance.
38
Survival and Growth performance of Pacific white Shrimp Litopenaeus
vannamei (Boone1931) Under Different Stocking Densities
Introduction
With increased population and diminished natural fishing resources
supply of aquatic products have limited for the human consumption around the
world. In many Asian countries culture of fish and shrimp got scope for aquatic
production. Due to various reasons aquaculture is growing faster and gaining
importance in our country. Feed is one of the major components of production
expenditure, representing up to 60% of variable cost (Hepher, 1988; Tacon et
al., 1998). The success of its culture is solely depends on survival rates and
average weight of shrimp that it attains at the time of harvest. In aquaculture
“stocking density” should denote the concentration of which organisms are
initially stocked into a system. However, it is generally used to refer to the
density of organisms at point of time. It is considered to be one of the important
factors that affect on organisms growth, feed utilization and grass production.
The proper utilization of the space for the maximum production through
intensive culture can improve the profitability of the shrimp intensification.
Shrimp intensification by increasing stocking density is also found suitable to
overcome the problems of land shortage. On the other hand several studies
have indicated that on inverse relationship between the stocking density and
growth of shrimp (Krishna, 2006; 2009).
Survival and growth of the organisms are known to be influenced by the
availability of right type of food in right concentrations. Proper management of
nursery and rearing ponds involves the providing of growing larvae, juveniles
and adults with right kind of natural and supplementary food for right time
(Krishna, 2006). In practice, the densities at which farmers keep their stock are
based on the experience and institution, with codes of practice and hand books
being used as guide. Information regarding effect of stocking density of the
shrimp performance during intensive culture is limited, inconsistent and some
time controversial.
39
In recent years aquaculture intensification has became a common practice throughout the world. To get the maximum profit from a unit area farmers are reporting to higher stocking densities and artificial fertilization of the ponds and supplementary feeding with good management practices they were using artificial feeds. In these culture systems with the over intensification there is a chance of stress to the growing organism. During stress pathogens present in the pond enter and cause diseases to the culture organism. The disease intensification in shrimp results in severe mortality due to stress. During the last few years’ Asian countries were severely affected with many viral diseases, particularly India faced massive economic loss in recent years due to White Spot Disease (WSD). Continuous outbreak of WSSV to tiger shrimp Peneaus monodon has spread and caused large scale mortalities and severe damage to shrimp aquaculture industry.
In a successful shrimp farming practice stocking density is one of the important and basic parameter to avoid stress. It plays a vital role in the confined environments. It addresses both the carrying capacity of the holding environment and the spatial and behavioral needs of the species. Commonly it was defined as the weight of fish/shrimp per unit volume in unit time of water flow in the holding environment (Ellis, 2001). Normally low stocking leads to economic loss and high densities affect the shrimp welfare. Sometimes higher stocking density and poor water quality management are the major reasons for many disease outbreaks.
Generally Survival, growth and production of a shrimp depends on the type of culture system (e.g. extensive, intensive and semi- intensive). Stocking rates for high-density aquaculture are typically thousand fold greater than wild environments. Understanding the relationship among density, mean size, survival and yields of semi-intensive cultured shrimp is more important to increase production efficiencies and lower the nutrient effluents. High stocking density of fish or crustaceans in ponds usually exacerbates problems with water quality and sediment deterioration. The required water quality is determined by the specific organism to be cultured and has many components that are interwoven. Growth and survival, which together determine the ultimate yield,
40
are influenced by a number of ecological parameters and management practices.
Water quality management became the limiting factor because of higher
feeding rates and greater stocking densities in the intensive farming. The
physico-chemical factors of the pond water and quality of supplementary feed
as individual or synergistically plays important role on shrimp production. The
ecosystem and biota of the culture pond may also influence the production
performance of shrimp culture. The growth and survival of shrimps are affected
by water temperature, salinity, pH and dissolved oxygen concentration
(Subrahmanyam, 1973; Verghese et al., 1975, 1982; Liao, 1977). Many studies
have aimed to increase production of shrimps through manipulating of stocking
density, fertilization, artificial feeding, opening of new lands for culture and
combination of other species into the culture system (Verghese et al., 1975;
Chakraborti et al., 1985; Krishna, 2006).
Several authors described about the growth in shrimp culture systems
based on stocking density. (Cailout et al., 1976; Sedgwick 1979; Maguire and
Leedow 1983). Some authors have reported an inverse relationship between
growth and stocking density (Lee et al., 1986; Sandifer et al., 1987; Whay-
Ming and Yew-Hu, 1992; Daniels et al., 1995). Through many researchers
stocking densities have been established for several species of penaeid shrimps
in high-salinity systems, including P.monodon (Ray and Chien 1992),
P.vannamei (Wyban et al., 1987; Sandifer et al., 1987), P.penicillatus (Liao
and Chien 1990) and P.semisulcatus (Al-ameer and Cruz 2006).
No proper research has yet been done on the effect of stocking density in
long term survival and growth performance of L.vannamei. Hence it was aimed
to evaluate the effect of different stocking density on the survival and growth
of L.vannamei for the present study.