Mau
ri O
ra: T
e Ao
Māo
ri
Mauri Ora :Te Ao Māori
Mauri O
ra: Te Ao Māori
Mauri Ora : Te Ao Māori Puritia ki ngä taonga tuku iho a ö tätou tupuna
Cultural identity may be a critical prerequisite for good health, and as Professor Mason Durie states (Durie, 2004), security of identity, a health promotion goal. One of the tasks of health promotion is to facilitate access by Mäori to te ao Mäori, the Mäori world. This includes access to Te Reo, the language and dialects; tikanga, the processes and practices; marae, the community focal point; waahi tapu, sites of importance; and access to whänau, Hapü and iwi.
As we have seen in the previous chapter, the Auckland region is home to a diverse community of Māori who identify with the many iwi of Aotearoa. There are, however, still a signifi cant number of Māori in the Auckland region who are unsure of their Māori identity. This has implications for health providers in relation to how best to deliver health services and health messages.
Many Māori in the region live away from their haukäinga or the marae and area to which they are affi liated. For some of these people the pan tribal marae provides an extension of whānau support and access to te ao Māori. Māori cultural identity is seen by many as a prerequisite for good health, and access to the Māori world inclusive of Te Reo and tikanga as critical.
Māori providers, such as Te Hotu Manawa Māori, Hapai Te Hauora Tapui Ltd, Te Hä o Te Oranga, Wai Health, Raukura Hauora o Tainui, Te Puna Hauora o te Rakipaewhenua, Turuki Health care and Papakura Marae, have developed specifi c health services for Māori within the Auckland region.
Te Reo Mäori
The 2001 New Zealand Census provides this report with the most up to date data concerning the state of the Māori language. In it the question was asked “In which language(s) could you have a conversation about a lot of everyday things? The proportion of Māori ethnic group who included Te Reo Māori, varies by age and district (Figure 39). The percentage of Māori speakers in the under fi ve age group excludes those too young to speak.
25
Mau
ri O
ra: T
e Ao
Māo
ri
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
0 to 4 5 to 9 10 to 19 20 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 59 60 to 69 70 to 79 80 and
over
Waitemata Auckland Counties Manukau
Figure 12: Percentage Māori reporting speak Te Reo by age group and DHB, Auckland 2001.
Source: Statistics New Zealand, Census 2001
A more localised view of spoken Te Reo trends can be obtained by mapping the same data at census area level. Figure 39 shows the proportion of Māori within each area that reported speaking Te Reo in the census. The areas in blue represent areas with above the regional average proportion speaking te Reo.
This map also shows areas where the Māori population of Auckland are concentrated by representing the number of people per square kilometre as the height of the areas. Thus it is possible to identify areas with both a high population density and relatively high rate of Te Reo use, such as Burbank and Papakura East. Other areas, such as Orakei North, have a relatively high proportion of speakers but fewer people per square kilometre.
26
Mauri O
ra: Te Ao Māori
Matipo
Beachaven North
Burbank
Rowandale
Hyperion
PapakuraEast
Pukekohe North
Mangere South
OrakeiNorth
Weymouth
TamakiHelensville
Waiuku
Mt EdenNorth
Regional Proportion SpeakingTe Reo Maori 25%
Proportion Speaking Te Reo Māori
Insufficient Data
1 - 8%
9 - 16%
17 - 25%
26 - 30%
31 - 35%
DHB Boundaries
CAU height represents Maori populationdensity
Figure 13: Competence in Te Reo Māori and population density by CAU 2001
Source: Statistics New Zealand, Census 2001
A special survey of Māori was undertaken after the census to obtain more information about the use of Te Reo. Because the study used a sample the results are only available for the whole region.
The study examined all aspects of Te Reo use including speaking, listening, and reading profi ciency, and an overall profi ciency score was generated.
A comparison between Auckland Māori and all Māori, for those over 15 years, in each of the three profi ciency areas is shown in Table 5 below. The way fi ndings are reported in the survey makes it diffi cult to determine whether apparent differences between groups were statistically signifi cant. Nevertheless, the table suggests a trend towards a lower level of profi ciency in Auckland than for the Māori population of the country overall. This difference appears to be consistent across different types of Te Reo use.
27
Mau
ri O
ra: T
e Ao
Māo
ri Table 5: A. listening, B. reading and C. writing. Te reo profi ciency for Auckland Māori over 15 years compared to New Zealand, 2001
Profi ciency level
Very well Well Fairly well Not very well Few words or phrases
Auck NZ Auck NZ Auck NZ Auck NZ Auck NZA 4.6% 5.7% *1.4% 3.5% 8.9% 10.7% 16.9% 22.3% 68.2% 57.8%B 7.2% 8.9% 3.9% 6.4% 16.1% 18.4% 21.1% 25.4% 51.6% 40.9%C 5.7% 6.8% 3.7% 5.8% 12.7% 15.9% 20.1% 24.5% 57.7% 47.0%
Source: Data from 2002 Health of the Māori Language Survey conducted by Statistics NZ on behalf of Te Puni Kokiri.
When these data are combined into an overall profi ciency score the differences between Auckland Māori and all Māori can be examined by age (Table 6). While differences to the whole country are evident in all age groups, the table suggests that differences are greater for the 15 to 34 and 35 to 54 age groups with approximately 14% more Auckland Māori aged 15 to 34 reporting no profi ciency in the survey.
Table 6: Overall profi ciency by age group. Auckland compared to all New Zealand, 2001
Very High High Medium Low None
AgeGroup Auck NZ Auck NZ Auck NZ Auck NZ Auck NZ
15-34 2% 3% 5% 7% 17% 20% 27% 35% 48% 34%35-54 5% 6% 4% 7% 14% 17% 33% 36% 45% 33%
Over 55 21% 26% 13% 13% 14% 14% 22% 23% 31% 24%Total 5% 7% 6% 8% 16% 18% 28% 34% 45% 33%
Source: Data from 2002 Health of the Māori Language Survey conducted by Statistics NZ on behalf of Te Puni Kokiri (modifi ed).
Access to marae
The project team identifi ed 55 marae in the region. Measuring accessibility of marae is not simply a geographic question. Nevertheless, a map is used to show the locations of marae within the region. Marae have been classifi ed into whānau or iwi, education, church, or naval (one marae). Three maps are presented here, one for each of the three DHBs in the region (Figure 14 to Figure 16).
28
Mauri O
ra: Te Ao Māori
Panuku Marae
Te Kiri Marae
Puatahi Marae
Kakanui Marae
Haranui Marae
Awataha MaraeTe Kamaka Marae
Te Kotuku MaraeMahanahana Marae
Te Roopu Kakariki
Te Araparera Marae
Te Taua Moana Marae
Whiti Te Ra o Reweti
Te Marae o Hoani Waititi
Nga Pipi o Te Purapura Pai
Te Piringatahi o te Maungarongo Marae
Panuku Marae
Te Kotuku Marae
Mahanahana Marae
Te Roopu Kakariki
Te Marae o Hoani Waititi
Auhia Kia Mohio Kia Rangatira Marae
0 1 2 3 40.5Km
0 4 8 12 162KilometresMarae Organisations
Religious
Education
General
Navy
General Features
DHB Boundaries
Arterial Roads
Highways and Motorways
Built Up Areas
Figure 14: Marae of Waitemata District Health Board
Source: Takoa 2003, Auckland Territorial Authorities, and various personal communications
29
Mau
ri O
ra: T
e Ao
Māo
ri
Ruapotaka
Orakei Marae
Te Mahurehure
Waipapa Marae
Tatai Hono Marae
Tutahi Tonu Marae
Te Tira Hou Marae
Te Unga Waka MaraeTe Poho o Tamaki Marae
Nga Wai o Horotiu Marae
Kokiri Ki Maungarei Marae
Piritahi
Kawa - Aotea MaraeMotairehe - Aotea Marae
0 6 12 18 243Km
0 1 2 3 40.5Kilometres
Counties M
anukau DH
B
Wai
tem
ata
DH
B
Waitemata DHB
Marae Organisations
Religious
Education
General
Navy
General Features
DHB Boundaries
Arterial Roads
Highways and Motorways
Built Up Areas
Figure 15: Marae of Auckland District Health Board
Source: Takoa 2003, Auckland Territorial Authorities, and various personal communications
30
Mauri O
ra: Te Ao Māori
Pukaki Kia Aroha
Whaiora Marae
Papakura Marae
Manurewa Marae
Makaurau Marae
Whatapaka Marae
Te Tahawai Marae
Tauranganui Marae
Ngati Otara Marae
Nga Hau e Wha Marae
Nga Tau e Rua Marae
Nga Whare Waatea Marae
Kaiaua -Wharekawa Marae
Ngai Tai Iwi Umupuia Marae
Pukaki
Mataatua Marae
Mataatua Marae
Makaurau Marae
Anglican Marae Church
Nga Whare Waatea Marae
Te Puea Memorial Marae
Papatuanuku Kokiri Marae
Te Karaiti te Pou Herenga Waka
Nga Tapuwae College Marae
Te Wananga Pupuri Kori
0 1 2 3 40.5Km
0 4 8 12 162KilometresMarae Organisations
Religious
Education
General
Navy
General Features
DHB Boundaries
Arterial Roads
Highways and Motorways
Built Up Areas
Waitemata DHBA
uckl
and
DH
B
Figure 16: Marae of Counties Manukau District Health Board
Source: Takoa 2003, Auckland Territorial Authorities, and various personal communications
31
Mau
ri O
ra: T
e Ao
Māo
ri
Orewa
Pukekohe
WaiukuTuakau
Maraetai
Wellsford
Warkworth
Riverhead
Helensville
Snells Beach
Muriwai Beach
Piha
Huia
Puhoi
Hunua
Naike
Omaha
Leigh
Pakiri
Wainui
Glorit
Awhitu
Mercer
Pokeno
Kaiaua
Claris
Aka Aka
Taupaki
Whatipu
Paerata
Te Hana
Waiwera
Tryphena
Matakana
Waimauku
Whitford
Clevedon
Ramarama
Kingseat
Waiatarua
Flat Bush
Alfriston
Glenbrook
Paremoremo
Komokoriki
South Head
Dairy Flat
Kaukapakapa
Coatesville
Glen Murray
Orere Point
Port Fitzroy
Happy Valley
Kawakawa Bay
Port Waikato
Mangatawhiri
Te Arai Point
Whangaparapara
Albany Village
Glenbrook Beach
Otara
Massey
Oneroa
Otahuhu
Remuera
Onetangi
Red Hill
Takanini
Takapuna
Avondale
New Lynn
Birkdale
Henderson
Pakuranga
Devonport
Glenfield
Glen Innes
Papatoetoe
Mount Roskill
0 7 14 21 283.5Kilometres
Claris
Tryphena
Port Fitzroy
Whangaparapara
0 3 6 9 121.5
Km
Māori TV Coverage
Little/No Signal
Strong Signal
Lesser Signal
Marae Organisations
Church
Education
General
Navy
DHB Boundaries
Highways and Motorways
Coverage and signal strength is predicted only. Poor receptionmay occur in some pockets of the strong signal areas and
conversely adequate reception may be achieved outside ofthe displayed coverage area.
Access to Mäori television
The advent of the Māori television service has created new opportunities for Māori to access te ao Māori. The free-to-air coverage is shown to represent the accessibility of this resource. Figure 17 shows the areas in which it is likely that viewers can receive Māori television without paying for a satellite connection.
Figure 17: Predicted reception coverage of Māori Television
Adapted with permission from Johnston, Dick and Associates Ltd. 2004 Auckland
32
Mauri O
ra: Te Ao Māori
Access to Mäori education
Access to Māori specifi c education such as Köhanga Reo and Wänanga can be considered to be part of both Mauriora and Whaiora. Participation in Köhanga Reo is discussed in relation to trends in early childhood education generally, and trends in tertiary education are discussed in the Whaiora section. (page 61)
Data are available for Māori participation at the Manukau campus of Te Wänanga o Aotearoa. In 2004 there were 727 Māori men and 1,613 Māori women enrolled at this campus.
Kapa Haka
Participation in cultural activities is a measure of health and wellbeing for Māori. Within the Auckland region there are a number of festivals each year for both school aged children and for school leavers. This indicates a larger number of people who support each participant being involved in maintaining their culture (parents, whānau).
Table 7 below shows estimates of the number of Auckland children that participated in festivals in 2004. The numbers of groups participating is an underestimate of the numbers participating at local level, as not every group can participate in every festival.
There are competitions for school leavers and adults, in which regional winners compete at the national level in the National Māori Festival of the Arts and the Super12 Kapa Haka.
Table 7: Participation in Kapa Haka competition
Age Group Counts of participating groups and individuals Festival or Event
5-10 years 110 groups – 3,600 children Regional Primary Kapa Haka Festival
11-13 years 25 groups – 1,000 children Regional Primary Kapa Haka Festival
13-18 years 38 groups – 1,500 young people in secondary schools
ASB Bank Auckland Secondary Schools’ Māori and Pacifi c Island Cultural festivalAHUREA Tinorangatiratanga
Post School Groups 16 groups - 650 young people Regional Seniors’ Competition, progressing to Nationals
33