Date post: | 31-Mar-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | barry-noble |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Measuring Liquid Viscosity Using Acoustic Absorption.
Presentation to NRL
by ASEE Summer Faculty Fellow candidate
Hartono Sumali
Purdue UniversityMarch 26, 2001
http://pasture.ecn.purdue.edu/~sumali/research/tube1.pdf
Motivation
Food industry rheometers rely on boundary layers. Fail to work with solid-liquid slip (mayonnaise
etc). Fail to obtain zero-shear viscosity. Cannot be used on-line.
Acoustic waves attenuate with liquid absorption.
Possible Approaches
Attenuation over distance Simple fundamental phenomenon
Requires long aparatus.
Reflection coefficient Ultrasonics have shown success. Empirical/
calibration. Three-dimensional nature complicates
fundamental analysis
)(12
12)()( xxexPxP
Approaches pursued so far
Longitudinal waves in tubes Low-frequency in narrow tube allows simple 1-D
analysis.
Fluid loading of plate vibration. Simple device.
Measuring complex acoustic speed with a tube.
Measure impedances of driving piston (Zm0) and end piston (ZmL).
Measure “total tube impedance”
F() uL()Exciting force Piston speed
Piston impedanceZm0
Piston impedanceZmL
Slender tube
Longitudinal waves
)(
)()(
Lu
FH
Total tube impedance F/uL
Pressure amplitude at position x and wavenumber k is
F() uL()Exciting force Piston speed
Zm0 ZmL
))(exp())(exp()( xLjkxLjkxp BA L = tube length, mA and B are constants from boundary conditions Boundary conditions:
1) F = pressure at (x=0) times piston area + speed at (x=0) times Zm0
2) Pressure at (x=L) times piston area = speed at (x=L) times ZmL.
Obtaining complex acoustic speed
Total tube impedance
F
u L
Z m0 Z mL cosc
L
1iZ mL
S cZ m0 S c
sinc
L
F/uL = total tube impedance, N/(m/s2)Zm0, ZmL = piston impedance in-vacuo, N/(m/s2)S = piston area, m2
= liquid density, kg/m3
L = tube length, m = frequency, rad/s
Measured
Known
Solve for complex acoustic speed c.
Obtaining viscosity from complex c
From relaxation time , obtain absorption coefficient using
jc 1c
2/1
2
2
1
11
2
1
c
= density, kg/m3
a = tube radius, m
2
1
ac
Viscosity can be related to absorption coefficient .
(Exact relationship to be determined)
From complex acoustic speed c, obtain relaxation time using
c = real speed, m/s
Experimental Aparatus
F/uL is obtained using FFT analyzer.
Accelerometer
Force from shaker or hammer.Mesured with force transducer
Piston with spring beam
Results so far: Accelerances0 dB = 1 m/s2/N Piston in-vacuo
-20
60
0 Hz 500
-5
25
Hz0 100
Tube with water, theoretical. Tube with water, experimental.
Measuring viscosity using plates Box is filled with liquid. Accelerance obtained with force transducer and
accelerometer.
Analytical model of plate
Plate deflection w at point (x,y) is summation of modal responses
M
mmm yxpyxw
1
),()(),,(
p is modal coordinate from
)(),()(
)(
)(
)(tf
yxt
t
t
t
φp
p
p
p 0
Z
I02
n
is mode shape, is natural frequency. is damping.
n2
12
2
0
0
M
Z
0
0
2
2
1 1
M M
From modal analysis
0 10 20 30 40 50 60-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
Frequency, Hz
dB
, 0
dB
=1
m/s
2/N
Z 1.5*Z2*Z
Results with plate: Accelerance with difference liquid viscosities
Theoretical Experimental
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
0 20 40 60
Frequency (Hz)
Ma
gn
itu
de
(d
B)
Water
0.5% CMC
1% CMC
Liquid viscosity or concentration of Carboxy-Methyl Cellulose (CMC) :High, medium, low
-10
20
Hz
60-30
20
Hz 60
Relationship between damping and viscosity
From first mode data
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
5 7 9
Frequency (Hz)
Mag
nit
ud
e (d
B)
Water
0.5% CMC
1% CMC
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Fluid
Vis
cosi
ty (
mP
a*s)
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
Acc
eler
ance
(m
/s^
2/N
)
Water 0.5% CMC 1% CMC
0 10 20 30 40 50 60-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
Frequency, Hz
dB
, 0
dB
=1
m/s
2/N
Z 1.5*Z2*Z
Conclusions so far
Higher viscosity results in higher damping. Absorption coefficient appears to have an
important role in relating viscosity to vibration responses of liquid-filled structures.
Much work is yet to be done to develop a method to masure viscosity using acoustic waves.