Meg Thornton/IMPC-FWA-PWE/(907) 361-3002/[email protected] 11/04/2008 UNCLASSIFIED 1 OF 18...

Meg Thornton/IMPC-FWA-PWE/(907) 361-3002/[email protected] 11/04/2008UNCLASSIFIED1 OF 18

Army Cost Analysis forStabilization and Demolition

of Select Buildings at Site Summit

12 Nov 2008

Directorate of Public Works

11/04/2008UNCLASSIFIEDMeg Thornton/IMPC-FWA-PWE/(907) 361-3002/[email protected]

Cost Analysis

• Army cost analysis includes the following properties:– Battery building– 3 Clamshells– 3 sentry stations– Launch control building– Vehicle maintenance and

repair– Missile maintenance

facility– 2 electrical substations– Dog kennel

2 OF 18

• Properties not analyzed in Army cost analysis:– Missile launch and

storage facility 1 and 2– Road, helicopter pad and

vehicle garage foundation– HIPAR building and

foundation– Magazines (high

explosive, guided missile, missile warhead and fuse and detonator

– B and C Electrical Substations


Demolition

• For this cost analysis ‘demolition’ includes the following costs:– The safe removal of hazardous materials (such as lead

paint and asbestos containing material) that have been identified or safely assumed to exist in specific buildings

– The removal of demolished materials from the site and the deposition of materials in the required location (land fill or suitable haz mat cell as approved by the EPA)

– The expected costs, risk insurance, contractors fees, permits, dumpsters, equipment, contractors, and all necessary time required for the required removal of material and demolition of complicated buildings

3 OF 18


Stabilization

• For this cost analysis ‘stabilization’ includes the following costs:– The above costs that would be associated with the

abatement and removal and disposal of hazardous materials.

– This analysis includes the method of stabilization as recommended by the NPS in their report and when options were provided the simplest method was chosen. Simply put buildings were stabilized by being weather-proofed simple roofs were applied when necessary and windows and doors were sealed to prevent access by trespassers and weather. The most cost effective solutions were sought.

4 OF 18


Costs Included in Figures:

• General contractors fees

• Subcontractors fees

• Permit fees

• Performance bonds

• Workmans Comp insurance

• Builders risk insurance

• Overhead

• Equipment fees

• Site work fees (dumpsters and removal, haz mat equipment, sampling equipment, qualified personnel)

• Framing and scaffolding necessary to access all facilities

5 OF 18


Battery Building

Demolition*

• 3-story wood portion only– $627,223

• Entire structure including concrete portion– $765,322

Stabilization*

• 3-story wood portion only– $1,428,828

• Entire structure including concrete portion– $1,671,443

• Annual Maintenance Cost– $48,523

6 OF 18

*Includes cost of abatement


Clamshell Radar

Demolition*• $64,557 per clamshell• Removes clamshell except for foundation

Stabilization*

• $63,030 per clamshell• Retains entire structure,

removes sheathing and insulation from outside

• Annual maintenance cost– $485 per clamshell

7 OF 18



Launch Control Building

Demolition*

• $263,019• Removes entire structure,

retains foundation

Stabilization*

• $407,100• Replaces roof, interior

structural components, outer sheathing

• Annual maintenance cost– $15,700

8 OF 18



Vehicle Maintenance and Storage Facility

Demolition*

• $144,292• Removes entire structure,

retains concrete foundation

Stabilization*

• $244,723• Replaces interior framing,

roof and outer sheathing• Annual maintenance cost

– $10,010

9 OF 18



Missile Maintenance Facility

Demolition*• $68,859

• Retains concrete and metal framing, removes roof, wood framing and outer sheathing

Stabilization*

• $116,752• Replaces roof, outer

sheathing• Annual maintenance cost

– $5,360

10 OF 18



Electrical Substations

Demolition*

• D1 and D2– $102,236 each

• Removal of Sheetmetal• Metal Frame to remain• Intermittent examination of

bolts, with replacement as necessary

Stabilization*

• D1 and D2– $152,236 each

• Annual maintenance cost– $5,000

• Repair sheetmetal and roof• Seal door to prevent entry

11 OF 18



Sentry Station 1 (39219)

Demolition*• $6,183• Includes removal of

everything except foundation

Stabilization*• $8,302

• Annual maintenance cost– $502

• Replace roof

• Cover windows and door with plywood to prevent unauthorized entry

12 OF 18




Demolition*

• $12,136.68• Includes removal of


Stabilization*

• $13,759.78• Annual Maintenance Cost

– $672

• Replace roof• Cover windows and door

with plywood to prevent unauthorized entry

13 OF 18




Demolition*

• $14,385• Includes removal of


Stabilization*

• $17,431• Annual maintenance cost

– $869

• Replace roof• Cover windows and door

with plywood to prevent unauthorized entry

14 OF 18



From AAHP

• Recommend if costs of stabilization exceed cost of demo that building is left ‘as is’ until funds become available.

• Recommend minimal protection/stabilization which would include sealing the building in plywood and weatherproofing the roof until such time as private or other funds become available.

• If demo is the only option consideration should be given among future partnering opportunities and possibilities to allow for a future interpretive option which could include a concept such as outlining of the building mass in tubular weathering steel.

15 OF 18


FONSS

• Pleased and concurs with NPS EXCEPT:– They don’t feel the Launch control building could be stabilized

inexpensively and feels the cost analysis needs to address the three different components of the building.

– A full EPA and OSHA compliance analysis should be conducted and the cost analysis should be updated as necessary prior to any demolition.

– They encourage USAG AK to pursue securing the concrete wing and re-roofing as soon as possible.

– Recommend cost comparisons prior to any action being undertaken.

– These reports are all based on visual assessments a hazardous materials survey must be completed prior to demo or stabilization and update costs as necessary.

16 OF 18


SHPO and ASLA

SHPO

• Recommend partial retention of the Launch control building be considered.

• This document provides a basis for continued consultation.

ASLA

• Pursue additional funds for stabilization of Battery Building due to the visual impact demo would cause.

17 OF 18


Recommendation

Retain• All 3 Clamshells• Battery Building

– retain concrete wing and foundation

• Metal Frames of Electrical Substations

– remove sheet metal siding and roof

• Missile Maintenance Facility– retain foundation and lower

concrete walls– remove siding, upper wood

framing and roof

Document and Demolish

• Launch Control Facility– retain concrete foundation

• Vehicle Maintenance Facility– retain concrete foundation

• Dog Kennel– retain concrete foundation and

footprint

• Battery Building– retain foundation– exterior stairwells– preserve interior wall art for future

interpretation

• Sentry Stations– Retain concrete foundation

18 OF 18

Date post:	27-Dec-2015
Category:	Documents
Upload:	blaise-singleton
View:	218 times
Download:	3 times

Meg Thornton/IMPC-FWA-PWE/(907) 361-3002/[email protected] 11/04/2008 UNCLASSIFIED 1 OF 18...

Documents