Date post: | 17-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | dortha-barber |
View: | 218 times |
Download: | 0 times |
MEPA Preparation:The Completed Staff Work
REGION XII - SOCCSKSARGEN
PRIMING ACTIVITY
REFLECT!
1. What can you say about the illustrations?
2.How does it connect to the preparation of MEPA or the Completed Staff Work (CSW)?
At the end of the session, the participants are expected to:
• Explain basic concepts of scoping, dashboard of key performance indicators and segmentation as quantitative data;
• Discuss pointers in discussing outcome progress implementation makers vis-à-vis key performance indicators; and
• Prepare completed staff work (CSW) for MEPA presentation.
Session Objectives:
Division Know (What I KNOW)
Want (What I want to Know)
Learn (What I Learned)
Cotabato Province
Completed Staff Work
Process of Preparing the CSW, importance, benefits and who shall prepare the CSW
Cotabato City
Importance of CSW, Target time to complete the CSW, duties and functionsComposition of the Group, Essence and importance
Sarangani Organic, structure and mechanisms
Roles, Functions and Responsibilities
KWL CHART
Gather Data &
Information
Process & Analyzed to
gain INSIGHTS
Facilitate Managerial
Actions/ Adjustments
Achieve and Accomplish Objectives
Storing of Data &
Information
Monitoring and Evaluation
MEPA Technology Track Efficiency (Implementation)
• Plan versus Actual (Physical)
Track Efficiency (Implementation)
• Plan versus Actual (Financial)
Track Effectiveness (Key Performance Indicators)
• Access and Efficiency
Track Effectiveness (Key Performance Indicators)
• Quality
Gather Data &
Information
Process & Analyzed to
gain INSIGHTS
Facilitate Managerial
Actions/ Adjustments
Achieve and Accomplish Objectives
Storing of Data &
Information
Monitoring and Evaluation
Looking at the Bigger Picture of DepED Planning and M&E Decentralized Setting
COMPLETED STAFF WORK
Quantitative Data for Decision Making Key Concepts : Scope •Plan versus Actual (Physical) • Plan versus Actual (Financial) Dashboard – is a visual display of a small number of critical metrics or KPIs so that stakeholders can see the necessary information at a glance in order to make informed decision (Accomplishments) • Key Performance Indicators (Access, Efficiency and Quality) Segmentation – part/section/segregateType / Classification of schoolsLocationTarget groups or learnersSize or populationProgram recipientAchievement (Quartile ratio)
What is the pie/table telling us?
6%7%
18%
5%18%12%
14%
12%6%
Programs and MOOE Status of Allocation and Uti-lization
SBM
ECARP
Muslim Education
IP Education
SPED
TechVoc
STE
ALS
MOOE
Programs Allocation Utilization %Utilization to Date
SBM 1,000,000 850,000 85.00%
ECARP 1,200,000 500,000 41.67%
Muslim Education 3,000,000 300,000 10.00%
IP Education 790,800 520,000 65.76%
SPED 3,000,000 2,500,000 83.33%
TechVoc 2,000,000 1,221,600 61.08%
STE 2,300,000 890,000 38.70%
ALS 2,000,000 400,000 20.00%
MOOE 1,000,000 400,000 40.00%
OVERALL BUDGET 16,290,800 7,581,600 46.54%
Elementary Schools Secondary Schools1Banisil CES (rural) J. Ang NHS (rural) 1
12New Society CES (urban) GSCNSSAT (urban)3Jose R. Lansang ES (urban) GSC SPED IS (urban) 24New Mabuhay ES (rural) Bawing NHS (rural) 35Bawing ES (rural) Buayan NHS (rural) 46Upper Tambler I CES (urban) Valdomar NHS (rural) 57GSC ES for the Arts (urban) Busano, Sr. HS (rural) 68H.N. Cahilsot CES I (urban) Bula NSF (urban) 79Habitat Community ES (rural) Upper Labay HS (rural) 8
10Dadiangas West CES (urban) E. Buscano Sr. HS (rural) 9Sambo-Ngilay HS (rural) 10
INCREASING ENROLLMENT (SY 2013-14)
4
5
1
2
3
6
7
8
9
10
1
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2 ACCESS
Data Map
1
2
34
5
6 7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Elementary Schools Secondary Schools1R. Acharon CES (urban) Irineo NHS MD (urban)2Fatima CES (urban) Labangal NHS (urban)3P. Acharon Sr. CES (urban) Lagao NHS (urban)4GSC SPED IS (urban) Banisil NHS (rural)5H.N. Cahilsot CES II (urban) GSC NHS (urban)6Dad. South CES (urban) Baluan NHS (rural)7Lagao CES (urban) Lanton HS (urban)8San Jose ES (rural) Dad. North HS (urban)9Bula CES (urban) Datu B. Balunto NHS (rural)
10Batomelong ES (rural) Tinagacan NHS (rural)
DECREASING ENROLLMENT (SY 2013-14)
ACCESS
Data Map
Other Schools
IP Ed Recipient Schools
Muslim Ed Recipient Schools
SPED Recipient Schools
SBM Recipient Schools
Division of General Santos City
387
780
509
623
658
2957
408
700
469
689
908
3174
350
694
479
639
1309
3471
Division of General Santos City
2014-2015 2013-2014 2012-2013
Comparative Performance on Enrolment, by Type of Schools and School Year to School Year (SYs 2012-2015)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
20
10
20
12 10
72
39
12
26
7 6
90
2016
32
4 3
75
2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015
Division of General Santos City Comparative Performance on Drop-out, by Type of Schools and School Year
to School Year (SYs 2012-2015)
FILIPINO MATHEMATICS ENGLISH SCIENCE AP OVERALL 66
68
70
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
83.81
78.03
79.59
78.57
74.89
78.98
81.65
77.45
80.4
74.68
73.08
75.03
81.9
75
74
79
75
76
General Santos City Cahilsot ES East ES
Division of General Santos City Comparative Performance on NAT Grade 6 MPS, by Subject
What is the graph telling us?
Suggested Flow of MEPA Presentation Present the following: • District/School Profile (1 slide) • Program Implementation Progress - Plan versus Actual (Physical) Plan versus Actual (Financial)
• Highlight strengths and bottlenecks of the program design and implementation • Proposed plan adjustments ( Operationalization of program design, system and policy)
• Dashboard (Access, Efficiency and Quality) dependent on quarter theme and focus • Dashboard must be supported by maps, charts and tables • Provide support explanation relative to KPIs increase/decrease whether barriers or bottlenecks through stories, issues and risks. • Proposed/suggested action
School Major Accomplishments
(Performance Indicators, Outputs Achieved, Improved
Fund Utilization, Progress Markers)
Major Difficulties(Access/Quality,
Project Management, Fund
Utilization,Relations with stakeholders)
Lessons learned(IP/Muslim
Education, Project Management)
Major Issues(Policy Needs, Funds
and Financial Management,
Project Implementation,
Capacity Building)
Highlights for 36 IP teachers LET passers – Ang kwento ng kwenta Division initiated Division Review for IP teachers to take the LET examination
Lack of capacity of SH to motivate IP/Muslim parents to send their children to school
Distance and difficult terrain
Mobilization of teachers to reach out concerned community and parents
RO to develop Internal and external factors to assess the increase and decrease of KPIs
Measuring the awareness of all stakeholders teachers
TA for the cooperative marketing strategies
TA how to credit the records of the students/pupils or accelerate pupils under catch-up program
TA on tools to assess the capacity of SHS and teachers
School Synthesis Template of SMEPA
School Major Accomplishments
(Performance Indicators, Outputs Achieved, Improved
Fund Utilization, Progress Markers)
Major Difficulties(Access/Quality,
Project Management, Fund
Utilization,Relations with stakeholders)
Lessons learned(IP/Muslim
Education, Project Management)
Major Issues(Policy Needs, Funds
and Financial Management,
Project Implementation,
Capacity Building)
Highlights for 36 IP teachers LET passers – Ang kwento ng kwenta Division initiated Division Review for IP teachers to take the LET examination
Lack of capacity of SH to motivate IP/Muslim parents to send their children to school
Distance and difficult terrain
Mobilization of teachers to reach out concerned community and parents
RO to develop Internal and external factors to assess the increase and decrease of KPIs
Measuring the awareness of all stakeholders teachers
TA for the cooperative marketing strategies
TA how to credit the records of the students/pupils or accelerate pupils under catch-up program
TA on tools to assess the capacity of SHS and teachers
District Synthesis Template of SMEPAs
Prepare a 20-minute District MEPA presentation for the 1st Quarterly DMEPA.
Let’s do
“Accountability breeds response-ability." Stephen R. Covey.