+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Metallography of Native Copper Artifacts: H. Kory Cooper...

Metallography of Native Copper Artifacts: H. Kory Cooper...

Date post: 01-Apr-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 6 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
Metallography of Native Copper Artifacts: Description and Interpretation a b H. Kory Cooper and Michael L. Wayman , University of Alberta a Department of Anthropology b Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering Introduction Metallography, the study of the microscopic structure of metals and alloys, has been used for more than a century to analyze metal objects from archaeological contexts. This poster demonstrates the use of metallography in examining the processing history of native copper artifacts and in distinguishing native copper from historic period smelted copper and copper alloys. his p s er w s ma p sible su r fo the Canadi irc mpolar In itute, the D par en o A thropo o and eF u ty o Gradu S dies an Rese ch T ot a de os by ppo t r m an C u st e tm t f n l gy th ac l f ate tu d ar - i ersi y f Alberta, Wr g l -St. l as ati nal ar Pr ser e, e S ate o l a fi e o Hi ory d Archae l gy, d the Unive sit Ala ka Anch ge.. Un v t o an el Ei N o P k & e v th t f A ask Ofc f st an oo an r y of s ora Methods Samples were cut using a jeweller's saw, embedded in epoxy mounts, and prepared using 3 standard metallographic procedures . These involved grinding on 240, 320, 400 and 600 grit silicon carbide abrasive papers (water cooled and lubricated), followed by a two-stage polishing procedure: 6 μm diamond paste on nylon cloth with an oil-based coolant/lubricant, then 0.05 μm alumina suspension in water on short-napped cloth. The samples were etched with a 1:1 ammonium hydroxide/hydrogen peroxide etchant for 5 seconds and photographed using optical microscopy and digital imaging. Compositional analysis of the historic material was obtained using SEM-EDX. Experimental Copper Working A small nugget of native copper was hammered to reduce its thickness from approximately 10 to 6 mm, then cut in half using a jeweller's saw. One half was then embedded in an epoxy mount and the other piece was annealed (heated in an air furnace at 450°C for 30 minutes) prior to being mounted. Both samples were prepared as described above. References 1. Cooper, H.K. (2007) The Anthropology of Native Copper Technology and Social Complexity: An Analysis Using Archaeology, Archaeometry, and Ethnohistory. PhD Thesis, University of Alberta. 2. Wayman, M.L., R.R. Smith, C.G. Hickey, and M.J.M. Duke (1985) The Analysis of Copper Artifacts of the Copper Inuit. In Journal of Archaeological Sciences 12:367-375. 3. Scott, D.A. (1991) Metallography and Microstructure of Ancient and Historic Metals. The Getty Conservation Institute: Singapore. 4. Vernon, W.W. (1990) New Archaeometallurgical Perspectives On the Old Copper Industry of North America. In Archaeological Geology of North America, edited by N. Lasca and J. Donahue, pp. 499-512. Centennial Special Volume. vol. 4. Geological Society of America, Boulder. 5. Franklin, U.M., E. Badone, R. Gotthardt, and B. Yorga (1981) An Examination of Prehistoric Copper Technology and Copper Sources in Western Arctic and Subarctic North America. National Museum of Man Mercury Series. Archaeological Survey of Canada Paper No. 101. 6. Leader, J.M. (1988) Technological Continuities and Specialization in Prehistoric Metalwork in the Eastern United States. PhD Dissertation, University of Florida. Materials Native Copper Specimen #1: sheet fragment, Gulkana Site, Late Prehistoric Athapaskan (AD 1100-1500). Specimen #2: nugget cold-hammered in the laboratory to replicate shaping process. Specimen #3: nugget treated as Specimen #2, then annealed for 30 minutes at 450°C. Castle Hill, Sitka, Alaska - Historic Russian (1820s-1840s) Specimen #4: smelted copper droplet recovered from slag (98.5% Cu, 0.5% Zn,1% Sn) Specimen #5: copper alloy nail (88% Cu, 7% Zn, 4% Sn, 1% Pb) Native Copper The use of native copper, i.e. copper found naturally in a pure metallic form (usually 99+ % copper), represents the earliest use of metals in both the Old and New Worlds. Metallography of native copper artifacts has provided evidence that shows that everywhere native copper was used in the past it was worked into shape using a combination of cold-hammering and annealing. Due to its purity, native copper is malleable enough to be hammered into shape. However, as it is hammered it becomes harder, an effect known as work-hardening, and if hammered too much it becomes brittle and begins to crack. Work-hardening can be alleviated through the process of annealing, i.e. heating in order to cause recrystallization and hence softening. This can occur at temperatures as low as about 300°C, well below the melting point of copper (approx. 1084°C). Both work-hardening and annealing affect the microstructure and hence metallography can be used to identify working processes in artifacts. Native Copper Nuggets Description The image on the left (Sp. #2) shows a cold-hammered microstructure. The grain shapes, which were equiaxed before the hammering, have been thinned parallel to the hammering direction and elongated perpendicular to that direction so that each grain is now pancake-shaped. The image on the right (Sp. #3) shows the effect of annealing on a piece of work-hardened copper. During annealing the cold-worked flattened grains are replaced by a new set of equiaxed grains through the process of recrystallization. Note that melting is not involved; this process happens well below the melting temperature. The recrystallization of copper often results in parts of a grain having a different crystallographic orientation than the rest of the grain. The result of this can be viewed microscopically as pairs of parallel lines referred to as annealing twins. The image below (Sp. #1) is of an archaeological specimen that displays an annealed microstructure. Late Prehistoric Athapaskan native copper artifacts from the Gulkana Site These images show the difference between native copper that has been cold-hammered and that which has been annealed. This clear distinction allows researchers to make note of the use of annealing in the past and describe the condition in which native copper artifacts were left by artisans. In unworked geological specimens of native copper there is often very little to see metallographically as the grain size can be quite large (on the scale of millimeters) leaving little defined structure. Alaska & Yukon Territory Current archaeological evidence indicates that native copper was first used in Alaska and the Yukon Territory 1 beginning ca. AD 1000 and continued to be used well into the historic period. Metallography can be used to make the important distinction between the indigenous use of native copper and 2 trade metal in regions where their use overlaps during the protohistoric and historic periods. The above images of smelted copper (Sp. #4) and copper alloy (Sp. #5) show abundant non- metallic inclusions which are characteristic of historic period smelted copper available in North America during the 18th and 19th centuries. The presence of these inclusions allows these materials to be easily distinguished from native copper. The above images show the difference between smelted copper in an as-cast (Sp. #4) condition vs. a copper alloy (Sp. #5) that has been hammered. The dark shadows in #4 are an effect known as coring; it is evidence of a non-uniform composition, which is diagnostic of cast metal. The grain structure of #5 shows the distortion characteristic of worked metal. Interpretation It has been suggested that the value of a native copper artifact, i.e., whether it served a utilitarian or social/symbolic purpose, can be determined based upon whether it was left in an annealed or 4 work-hardened condition . This argument contends that native copper artifacts are more effective (harder and sharper) when cold-hammered and that artifacts left in an annealed state could have only functioned in the social realm. This requires making a number of assumptions regarding both the use and value of native copper within a particular society. A total of 24 native copper artifacts 1,5 from the Gulkana site have been examined metallographically . All of these artifacts are tools or manufacture related debris and though cold-hammering was part of the manufacturing process, 6 all were left in an annealed state. Furthermore, experimental work has demonstrated that annealed native copper tools can perform as well as work-hardened ones in some contexts. Interpreting the behavior behind a metal artifact’s microstructure is not straightforward. However, metallographic examination can identify types of metals and specific metallurgical techniques, both of which are important for understanding metal use in the past. 0 200 400 km Alaska Territory British Co umbia l Northwest e ri s T r torie Use of native copper beginning approx. AD 1000 Yukon Gulkana Castle Hill
Transcript
Page 1: Metallography of Native Copper Artifacts: H. Kory Cooper ...archaeometry.missouri.edu/downloads/Saa_07/Cooper_Wayman_2007.pdfMetallography of Native Copper Artifacts: Description and

Metallography of Native Copper Artifacts: Description and Interpretation

a bH. Kory Cooper and Michael L. Wayman , University of AlbertaaDepartment of AnthropologybDepartment of Chemical and Materials Engineering

IntroductionMetallography, the study of the microscopic structure of metals and alloys, has been used for more than a century to analyze metal objects from archaeological contexts. This poster demonstrates the use of metallography in examining the processing history of native copper artifacts and in distinguishing native copper from historic period smelted copper and copper alloys.

his p s er w s ma p sible su r f o the Canadi irc mpolar In itute, the D par en o A thropo o and e F u ty o Gradu S dies an Rese ch T o t a de os by ppo t r m an C u st e tm t f n l gy th ac l f ate tu d ar -i ersi y f Alberta, Wr g l -St. l as ati nal ar Pr ser e, e S ate o l a f i e o Hi or y d Archae l gy, d the Unive sit Ala ka Anch ge..Un v t o an e l E i N o P k & e v th t f A ask O f c f st an o o an r y of s ora

MethodsSamples were cut using a jeweller's saw, embedded in epoxy mounts, and prepared using

3standard metallographic procedures . These involved grinding on 240, 320, 400 and 600 grit silicon carbide abrasive papers (water cooled and lubricated), followed by a two-stage polishing procedure: 6 µm diamond paste on nylon cloth with an oil-based coolant/lubricant, then 0.05 µm alumina suspension in water on short-napped cloth. The samples were etched with a 1:1 ammonium hydroxide/hydrogen peroxide etchant for 5 seconds and photographed using optical microscopy and digital imaging. Compositional analysis of the historic material was obtained using SEM-EDX.

Experimental Copper WorkingA small nugget of native copper was hammered to reduce its thickness from approximately 10 to 6 mm, then cut in half using a jeweller's saw. One half was then embedded in an epoxy mount and the other piece was annealed (heated in an air furnace at 450°C for 30 minutes) prior to being mounted. Both samples were prepared as described above.

References1. Cooper, H.K. (2007) The Anthropology of Native Copper Technology and Social Complexity: An Analysis Using Archaeology, Archaeometry, and Ethnohistory. PhD Thesis, University of Alberta.2. Wayman, M.L., R.R. Smith, C.G. Hickey, and M.J.M. Duke (1985) The Analysis of Copper Artifacts of the Copper Inuit. In Journal of Archaeological Sciences 12:367-375.3. Scott, D.A. (1991) Metallography and Microstructure of Ancient and Historic Metals. The Getty Conservation Institute: Singapore.4. Vernon, W.W. (1990) New Archaeometallurgical Perspectives On the Old Copper Industry of North America. In Archaeological Geology of North America, edited by N. Lasca and J. Donahue, pp. 499-512. Centennial Special Volume. vol. 4. Geological Society of America, Boulder.5. Franklin, U.M., E. Badone, R. Gotthardt, and B. Yorga (1981) An Examination of Prehistoric Copper Technology and Copper Sources in Western Arctic and Subarctic North America. National Museum of Man Mercury Series. Archaeological Survey of Canada Paper No. 101.6. Leader, J.M. (1988) Technological Continuities and Specialization in Prehistoric Metalwork in the Eastern United States. PhD Dissertation, University of Florida.

MaterialsNative Copper Specimen #1: sheet fragment, Gulkana Site, Late Prehistoric Athapaskan (AD 1100-1500).Specimen #2: nugget cold-hammered in the laboratory to replicate shaping process.

Specimen #3: nugget treated as Specimen #2, then annealed for 30 minutes at 450°C.

Castle Hill, Sitka, Alaska - Historic Russian (1820s-1840s)Specimen #4: smelted copper droplet recovered from slag (98.5% Cu, 0.5% Zn,1% Sn)Specimen #5: copper alloy nail (88% Cu, 7% Zn, 4% Sn, 1% Pb)

Native Copper The use of native copper, i.e. copper found naturally in a pure metallic form (usually 99+ % copper), represents the earliest use of metals in both the Old and New Worlds. Metallography of native copper artifacts has provided evidence that shows that everywhere native copper was used in the past it was worked into shape using a combination of cold-hammering and annealing. Due to its purity, native copper is malleable enough to be hammered into shape. However, as it is hammered it becomes harder, an effect known as work-hardening, and if hammered too much it becomes brittle and begins to crack. Work-hardening can be alleviated through the process of annealing, i.e. heating in order to cause recrystallization and hence softening. This can occur at temperatures as low as about 300°C, well below the melting point of copper (approx. 1084°C). Both work-hardening and annealing affect the microstructure and hence metallography can be used to identify working processes in artifacts.

Native CopperNuggets

DescriptionThe image on the left (Sp. #2) shows a cold-hammered microstructure. The grain shapes, which were equiaxed before the hammering, have been thinned parallel to the hammering direction and elongated perpendicular to that direction so that each grain is now pancake-shaped. The image on the right (Sp. #3) shows the effect of annealing on a piece of work-hardened copper. During annealing the cold-worked flattened grains are replaced by a new set of equiaxed grains through the process of recrystallization. Note that melting is not involved; this process happens well below the melting temperature. The recrystallization of copper often results in parts of a grain having a different crystallographic orientation than the rest of the grain. The result of this can be viewed microscopically as pairs of parallel lines referred to as annealing twins. The image below (Sp. #1) is of an archaeological specimen that displays an annealed microstructure.

Late Prehistoric Athapaskan native copper artifacts from the Gulkana Site

These images show the difference between native copper that has been cold-hammered and that which has been annealed. This clear distinction allows researchers to make note of the use of annealing in the past and describe the condition in which native copper artifacts were left by artisans. In unworked geological specimens of native copper there is often very little to see metallographically as the grain size can be quite large (on the scale of millimeters) leaving little defined structure.

Alaska & Yukon TerritoryCurrent archaeological evidence indicates that native copper was first used in Alaska and the Yukon Territory

1 beginning ca. AD 1000 and continued to be used well into the historic period. Metallography can be used to make the important distinction between the indigenous use of native copper and

2 trade metal in regions where their use overlaps during the protohistoric and historic periods.

The above images of smelted copper (Sp. #4) and copper alloy (Sp. #5) show abundant non-metallic inclusions which are characteristic of historic period smelted copper available in North America during the 18th and 19th centuries. The presence of these inclusions allows these materials to be easily distinguished from native copper.

The above images show the difference between smelted copper in an as-cast (Sp. #4) condition vs. a copper alloy (Sp. #5) that has been hammered. The dark shadows in #4 are an effect known as coring; it is evidence of a non-uniform composition, which is diagnostic of cast metal. The grain structure of #5 shows the distortion characteristic of worked metal.

InterpretationIt has been suggested that the value of a native copper artifact, i.e., whether it served a utilitarian or social/symbolic purpose, can be determined based upon whether it was left in an annealed or

4work-hardened condition . This argument contends that native copper artifacts are more effective (harder and sharper) when cold-hammered and that artifacts left in an annealed state could have only functioned in the social realm. This requires making a number of assumptions regarding both the use and value of native copper within a particular society. A total of 24 native copper artifacts

1,5from the Gulkana site have been examined metallographically . All of these artifacts are tools or manufacture related debris and though cold-hammering was part of the manufacturing process,

6 all were left in an annealed state. Furthermore, experimental work has demonstrated that annealed native copper tools can perform as well as work-hardened ones in some contexts. Interpreting the behavior behind a metal artifact’s microstructure is not straightforward. However, metallographic examination can identify types of metals and specific metallurgical techniques, both of which are important for understanding metal use in the past.

0 200 400

km

Alaska TerritoryBritish

Co

umbia

l

Northweste ri

s

T r torie

Use of native copper beginningapprox. AD 1000

Yukon

Gulkana

CastleHill

Recommended