Date post: | 29-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | kristopher-elliott |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 2 times |
Metra Board of DirectorsJune 10, 2011
Presented by Alex CliffordExecutive Director/CEO
Defeating the Deficit 2011, 2012 and Beyond
$10.0
$12.0
$14.0
$16.0
$18.0
$20.0
$22.0
$24.0
$26.0
2.90 2.95 3.00 3.05 3.10 3.15 3.20 3.25 3.30 3.35 3.40 3.45 3.50
Average Price Per Gallon J une to December
Budget
Overr
un (
Millions)
2011 Fuel Price Effect On Budget
1
Metra 2011 Forecast
Diesel Fuel Variance $ (18.5)
$ in millions
2
Metra 2011 Forecast
Diesel Fuel Variance $ (18.5)
$ in millions
Revenue Variance, Net 1.0
Balance (17.5)
3
Metra 2011 Forecast
Diesel Fuel Variance $ (18.5)
$ in millions
Revenue Variance, Net 1.0
Balance (17.5)Operating Efficiencies 6.2
Balance (11.3)
4
Metra 2011 Forecast
Diesel Fuel Variance $ (18.5)
$ in millions
Revenue Variance, Net 1.0
Balance (17.5)Operating Efficiencies 6.2
Balance (11.3)
Cash Items:
Est. 2011 Excess Sales Tax 9.0
Est. Senior Fare Proceeds 2.5
FEMA Snow Reimbursement 0.9
Total Cash 12.4
5
Metra 2011 Forecast
Diesel Fuel Variance $ (18.5)
$ in millions
Revenue Variance, Net 1.0
Balance (17.5)Operating Efficiencies 6.2
Balance (11.3)
Cash Items:
Est. 2011 Excess Sales Tax 9.0
Est. Senior Fare Proceeds 2.5
FEMA Snow Reimbursement 0.9
Total Cash 12.4
Balance $ 1.16
Financial Picture 2012 and Beyond
• Funding and fare gaps• How we have managed
through • The future as it stands
today• Next steps
7
$287
$311 $309
$369
$310
$374
$318
$384
$327
$396
$338
$408
$200
$250
$300
$350
$400
$450
2008($23.6)
2009($60.0)
2010($64.0)
2011($66.0)
2012($68.6)
2013($70.5)
Actual/Estimated RTA Projections
( In
$M
illio
ns)
Shortfall
Growing Sales Tax Shortfall
Cumulative
Shortfall
$353.6
Metra 85% Sales Tax and New Transit Funding
2008 – 2013 Actual/Estimated vs. RTA Projections Made in 2007
8
Growing Fare GapMetra vs. Peer Agency Fares
Monthly Fares, 1990 and 2011Monthly Fares in Effect in 1990 by Metra Zone, Metra
vs. Avg. of Large Agencies
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
$400
$450
A B C D E F G H I J K L M
Metra, 1990 Avg of Large Systems, 1990
Monthly Fares in Effect in 2011 by Metra Zone, Metra vs. Avg. of Large Agencies
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
$400
$450
A B C D E F G H I J K L M
Metra, 2011 Avg of Large Systems, 2011
9
Depleting Capital to Fund Operations
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
( In
$M
illi
on
s)
Actual and Planned Transfers from Capital to Operating
2008-2009 temporary relief from 2008 fare
increase & sale tax increase
10
Operating Cuts• Management Depletion
– Vacancies not filled
– Lack of training
– Lack of competitive pay
• Systems Decline– Outdated IT systems
– Outdated financial systems
– Lack of strategic technology planning
• Operating Cuts– Deferred apprentice program
– Uniforms and other customer interface
– Fewer Double-Header Locomotives11
($30.0)
($20.0)
($10.0)
$0.0
$10.0
$20.0
$30.0
$40.0
$50.0
$60.0
$70.0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
(in $
Mill
ion
s)2011 Cash Situation
2011 Cash Balance Without Transfer of Capital Funds
12
Growing Operating Deficit
9.30%
24.30%
41.00%
2006 2011
Pe
rce
nt
Gro
wth
Revenue Expense Deficit
Metra Historical Financial Results – Percent Growth from 2006
Deficit
Expense
Revenue
13
2006Deficit = $250MExpense = $525MRevenue = $275M
2010Deficit = $319MExpense = $616MRevenue = $296M
Growing Capital Deficit(
In $
Mil
lio
ns)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
4002
006
200
7
200
8
200
9
201
0
201
1
201
2
201
3
201
4
201
5
Capital Core Preventive Maintenance
Funding needed to achieve a State of Good Repair
* 2012 – 2015 amounts are projected estimates
† Not inclusive of State of Illinois Bond funding
$7.37B NeededOver 10-Years
State of Good Repair – Capital Budget*
14
Growing Funding Deficit
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$14020
09
2010
2011
2012
2013
Capital Funds Recovery Ratio Relief Sales Tax Operating Funding Gap
( In
$M
illi
on
s)
Capital Funds / Credits / Other Sources to cover Operating Expense Growth
Estimated 2011 Sales
Tax Surplus
2010 Sales Tax to cover 2009 deficit
15
Operating/Capital Downward Spiral• Reduced On-Time Reliability
– Rising Delays– Slow orders– Locomotive failures
• Inferior Customer Environment– Heating & Air Conditioning– Station environment– More over-crowding, shorter trains– Service cuts, less frequent service
• Failure to Meet Recovery Ratio
• Shrinking instead of Growing– Lost New Starts opportunities
16
Next Steps
• Request for Finance Committee Meeting– Late June
17