Date post: | 11-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | eustacia-gibson |
View: | 212 times |
Download: | 0 times |
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 11
Measurements’ analysisMeasurements’ analysis
S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. NewmanS. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman
IntroductionIntroduction
Techniques, toolsTechniques, tools
Results (selected)Results (selected)
OutlookOutlook
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements: G. Arduini, H. Damerau, E. Métral, and: G. Arduini, H. Damerau, E. Métral, and
OP-PS crew!!!OP-PS crew!!!
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 22
Introduction - IIntroduction - I
Aim of these studies:Aim of these studies:Optimisation of various parameters Optimisation of various parameters Identification of sources (beam dynamics) of trapping Identification of sources (beam dynamics) of trapping fluctuationsfluctuations
Instruments used:Instruments used:Mainly transformers in TT2 to evaluate extraction and Mainly transformers in TT2 to evaluate extraction and trapping efficiency trapping efficiency
BCTFI212: spill shape and total intensityBCTFI212: spill shape and total intensityBCT372: total intensityBCT372: total intensity
Wire scanner to evaluate islands’ parameters and Wire scanner to evaluate islands’ parameters and trapping efficiencytrapping efficiencyScreens in TT2 to evaluate position fluctuations and Screens in TT2 to evaluate position fluctuations and emittance/sigma variationemittance/sigma variation
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 33
Introduction - IIIntroduction - II
General approachGeneral approachPerform scans over selected parametersPerform scans over selected parametersEstimate trapping/extraction efficiency Estimate trapping/extraction efficiency Compute average/standard deviation of Compute average/standard deviation of trapping/extraction vs. parameter testedtrapping/extraction vs. parameter testedEvaluate correlation between trapping/extraction Evaluate correlation between trapping/extraction efficienciesefficienciesEvaluate frequencies in time-evolution of Evaluate frequencies in time-evolution of trapping/extraction efficiencytrapping/extraction efficiency
Plain FFT not always applicable (not evenly-spaced data)Plain FFT not always applicable (not evenly-spaced data)Lomb periodogramme usedLomb periodogramme used
Equivalent to fitting sine/cosine functions to measured dataEquivalent to fitting sine/cosine functions to measured dataFigure-of-merit function suitable for statistical interpretation: Figure-of-merit function suitable for statistical interpretation: significance level of fit frequencies.significance level of fit frequencies.
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 44
Introduction - IIIIntroduction - III
Key beam/machine parametersKey beam/machine parametersTune:Tune:
Resonance crossingResonance crossingControl of adiabaticity of whole processControl of adiabaticity of whole process
Sextupoles/octupolesSextupoles/octupolesIslands’ generationIslands’ generationSeparationSeparationAdiabaticity Adiabaticity
Damper:Damper:Used to increase trapping (by increasing horizontal Used to increase trapping (by increasing horizontal particles’ amplitude)particles’ amplitude)..
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 55
When are the fluctuations When are the fluctuations generated? – results - Igenerated? – results - I
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20
Am
plitu
de (
A.U
.)
Position (mm)
7/2/2010 12:12 7/2/2010 12:13 7/2/2010 12:13 7/2/2010 12:14 7/2/2010 12:15
7/2/2010 12:16 7/2/2010 12:16 7/2/2010 12:17 7/2/2010 12:18 7/2/2010 12:20
y = 0.6559x + 7.4148R² = 0.721
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
90
92
94
96
98
100
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Trap
ping
fra
ction
(%)
Extr
actio
n effi
cien
cy (%
)
Trapping fraction from wire scanner (%)
Extraction eff. Capture TRA212
C760 msC760 ms
Hard multi-Gaussian fit!Hard multi-Gaussian fit!
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 66
When are the fluctuations When are the fluctuations generated? – results - Igenerated? – results - I
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20
Am
plitu
de (
A.U
.)
Position (mm)
7/2/2010 11:56 7/2/2010 11:57 7/2/2010 11:57 7/2/2010 11:58 7/2/2010 11:59 7/2/2010 12:03
7/2/2010 12:03 7/2/2010 12:04 7/2/2010 12:05 7/2/2010 12:06 7/2/2010 12:08 7/2/2010 12:10
y = 0.8809x + 2.6177R² = 0.7802
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
90
92
94
96
98
100
10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Trap
ping
fra
ction
from
(%)
Extr
actio
n effi
cien
cy (%
)
Trapping fraction from wire scanner (%)
Extraction eff.Capture TRA212
C790 msC790 ms
Easier multi-Gaussian fit!Easier multi-Gaussian fit!
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 77
When are the fluctuations When are the fluctuations generated? - conclusionsgenerated? - conclusions
Taking into account thatTaking into account thatIt is not possible to collect too much statistics with It is not possible to collect too much statistics with wire scannerswire scannersThe five-Gaussian fit might be hard to perform when The five-Gaussian fit might be hard to perform when the islands are not well separatedthe islands are not well separated
Then, the fluctuations seem to be generated Then, the fluctuations seem to be generated right at the beginning of the splitting.right at the beginning of the splitting.
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 88
Damper effectDamper effect
Principle:Principle:It excites the beam at an harmonic (h) of the betatron It excites the beam at an harmonic (h) of the betatron frequencyfrequencyIt excites the beam at a given tune valueIt excites the beam at a given tune valueIn summary:In summary:
ffdamperdamper=f=frevrev (h+q (h+qxx))Other parametersOther parameters
Kick amplitudeKick amplitudeStart and end times of excitationStart and end times of excitationOther excitation formsOther excitation forms
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 99
Damper effect – results - IDamper effect – results - I
Principle:Principle:It excites the beam at an harmonic (h) of the betatron It excites the beam at an harmonic (h) of the betatron frequencyfrequencyIt excites the beam at a given tune valueIt excites the beam at a given tune valueIn summary:In summary:
ffdamperdamper=f=frevrev (h+q (h+qxx))Other parametersOther parameters
Kick amplitudeKick amplitudeStart and end times of excitationStart and end times of excitationOther excitation formsOther excitation forms
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
90
92
94
96
98
100
102
104
106
108
110
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000
Trap
ping
(%
)
Extr
actio
n effi
cien
cy (%
)
Time difference (s)
Average Extr. Eff.
Trapping (h=25)
Trapping (h=16)
Trapping (h=15)
Trapping (h=17)
Trapping (h=7)
Trapping (h=9)
Trapping (h=8)
August 4August 410
12
14
16
18
20
22
90
92
94
96
98
100
102
104
106
108
110
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000
Trap
ping
(%
)
Extr
actio
n effi
cien
cy (%
)
Time difference (s)
Average Extr. Eff.
Trapping (h=7)
Trapping (h=8)
Trapping (h=16)
August 8August 8
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 1010
Damper effect – results - IIDamper effect – results - II
Principle:Principle:It excites the beam at an harmonic (h) of the betatron It excites the beam at an harmonic (h) of the betatron frequencyfrequencyIt excites the beam at a given tune valueIt excites the beam at a given tune valueIn summary:In summary:
ffdamperdamper=f=frevrev (h+q (h+qxx))Other parametersOther parameters
Kick amplitudeKick amplitudeStart and end times of excitationStart and end times of excitationOther excitation formsOther excitation forms
10
12
14
16
18
20
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
690 700 710 720 730 740 750 760
Trap
ping
(%
)
Extr
actio
n effi
cien
cy (%
)
Excitation start (ms)
Averaged Extr. Eff. Averaged trapping
Resonance is crossed around 720 msResonance is crossed around 720 ms
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 1111
Damper effect – results - IIIDamper effect – results - III
Principle:Principle:It excites the beam at an harmonic (h) of the betatron It excites the beam at an harmonic (h) of the betatron frequencyfrequencyIt excites the beam at a given tune valueIt excites the beam at a given tune valueIn summary:In summary:
ffdamperdamper=f=frevrev (h+q (h+qxx))Other parametersOther parameters
Kick amplitudeKick amplitudeStart and end times of excitationStart and end times of excitationOther excitation formsOther excitation forms
10
12
14
16
18
20
93.0
93.5
94.0
94.5
95.0
95.5
96.0
96.5
97.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Trap
ping
(%
)
Extr
actio
n effi
cien
cy (%
)
Excitation length (ms)
Averaged Extr. Eff. Averaged trapping
Broad maximum: length minimised to avoid Broad maximum: length minimised to avoid emittance blow-upemittance blow-up
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 1212
Damper effect – results - IVDamper effect – results - IV
Principle:Principle:It excites the beam at an harmonic (h) of the betatron It excites the beam at an harmonic (h) of the betatron frequencyfrequencyIt excites the beam at a given tune valueIt excites the beam at a given tune valueIn summary:In summary:
ffdamperdamper=f=frevrev (h+q (h+qxx))Other parametersOther parameters
Kick amplitudeKick amplitudeStart and end times of excitationStart and end times of excitationOther excitation formsOther excitation forms
Broad maximum: length minimised to avoid Broad maximum: length minimised to avoid emittance blow-upemittance blow-up
0.245 0.246 0.247 0.248 0.249 0.25 0.251 0.252 0.253 0.254 0.25510
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Ave
rag
e T
rapp
ing
Eff
icie
ncy
Average Extraction EfficiencyAverage Trapping Efficiency
0.245 0.246 0.247 0.248 0.249 0.25 0.251 0.252 0.253 0.254 0.25580
85
90
95
100
105
110
Tune
Ave
rag
e E
xtra
ctio
n E
ffic
ienc
y
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 1313
Damper effect – results - VDamper effect – results - V
Principle:Principle:It excites the beam at an harmonic (h) of the betatron It excites the beam at an harmonic (h) of the betatron frequencyfrequencyIt excites the beam at a given tune valueIt excites the beam at a given tune valueIn summary:In summary:
ffdamperdamper=f=frevrev (h+q (h+qxx))Other parametersOther parameters
Kick amplitudeKick amplitudeStart and end times of excitationStart and end times of excitationOther excitation formsOther excitation forms
Broad maximum: length minimised to avoid Broad maximum: length minimised to avoid emittance blow-upemittance blow-up10
15
20
25
Ave
rag
e T
rapp
ing
Eff
icie
ncy
MD4_July_12_Damper_Study
Damper On Excite On
Damper On Excite Off
Normal MTEDamper OnExcite Off
Damper OffExcite Off
Damper OffExcite On
Various Various configurations configurations of damper of damper ON/OFF: clear ON/OFF: clear impact on impact on trapping; no trapping; no impact on impact on fluctuationsfluctuations
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 1414
Damper effect - summaryDamper effect - summary
Mild dependence of trapping on h -> Mild dependence of trapping on h -> selected selected h=8h=8Strong dependence of trapping on qx -> Strong dependence of trapping on qx -> selected qx=0.25selected qx=0.25Threshold effects on start excitation -> Threshold effects on start excitation -> selected 700 msselected 700 msBroad optimum for excitation length -> Broad optimum for excitation length -> selected 40 msselected 40 msEssentially no impact of other options (type of Essentially no impact of other options (type of modulation, slope in qx vs. time)modulation, slope in qx vs. time)
Strong impact on trapping efficiency of damper, Strong impact on trapping efficiency of damper, but no impact on fluctuations.but no impact on fluctuations.
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 1515
Sextupoles/octupoles effectSextupoles/octupoles effect
ODEs are used to compensate the non-linear ODEs are used to compensate the non-linear coupling between H/V plane. coupling between H/V plane. Sextupoles should not generate negative Sextupoles should not generate negative chromaticity (increasing their strengths reduces chromaticity (increasing their strengths reduces chromaticity)!chromaticity)!
-600
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Curr
ents
(A)
B-fie
ld (T
)
Cycle time (s)
B-field Sextupole 39Sextupole 55 Octupole 39Octupole 55 Octupoles
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 1616
Sextupoles/octupoles – results - ISextupoles/octupoles – results - I
ODEs are used to compensate the non-linear ODEs are used to compensate the non-linear coupling between H/V plane. coupling between H/V plane. Sextupoles should not generate negative Sextupoles should not generate negative chromaticity (increasing their strengths reduces chromaticity (increasing their strengths reduces chromaticity)!chromaticity)!
10
15
20
25
Ave
rag
e T
rapp
ing
Eff
icie
ncy
MD4_July6_scan_XMT39
2010
-07-
06 2
1:36
:00
2010
-07-
06 2
2:02
:31
2010
-07-
06 2
2:29
:03
2010
-07-
06 2
2:55
:34
2010
-07-
06 2
3:22
:06
2010
-07-
06 2
3:48
:37
2010
-07-
07 0
0:15
:09
2010
-07-
07 0
0:41
:41
2010
-07-
07 0
1:08
:12
2010
-07-
07 0
1:34
:44
2010
-07-
07 0
2:01
:15
2010
-07-
07 0
2:27
:47
2010
-07-
07 0
2:54
:18
2010
-07-
07 0
3:20
:50
2010
-07-
07 0
3:47
:22
2010
-07-
07 0
4:13
:53
2010
-07-
07 0
4:40
:25
2010
-07-
07 0
5:06
:56
2010
-07-
07 0
5:33
:28
2010
-07-
07 0
6:00
:00
XMT39: 10XMT39: 30XMT39: 50XMT39: 70XMT39: 90XMT39: 110XMT39: 130XMT39: 150XMT39: 160
Change of frequency of Change of frequency of fluctuations (rarely seen in the fluctuations (rarely seen in the whole measurement campaign)!whole measurement campaign)!
Limit of negative Limit of negative chromaticitychromaticity
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 1717
Sextupoles/octupoles – results - IISextupoles/octupoles – results - II
ODEs are used to compensate the non-linear ODEs are used to compensate the non-linear coupling between H/V plane. coupling between H/V plane. Sextupoles should not generate negative Sextupoles should not generate negative chromaticity (increasing their strengths reduces chromaticity (increasing their strengths reduces chromaticity)!chromaticity)!
10
15
20
25
Ave
rag
e T
rapp
ing
Eff
icie
ncy
MD4_August_12_scan_octupoles_amplitude
2010
-08-
12 0
4:48
:00
2010
-08-
12 0
5:06
:56
2010
-08-
12 0
5:25
:53
2010
-08-
12 0
5:44
:50
2010
-08-
12 0
6:03
:47
2010
-08-
12 0
6:22
:44
2010
-08-
12 0
6:41
:41
2010
-08-
12 0
7:00
:37
2010
-08-
12 0
7:19
:34
2010
-08-
12 0
7:38
:31
2010
-08-
12 0
7:57
:28
2010
-08-
12 0
8:16
:25
2010
-08-
12 0
8:35
:22
2010
-08-
12 0
8:54
:18
2010
-08-
12 0
9:13
:15
2010
-08-
12 0
9:32
:12
2010
-08-
12 0
9:51
:09
2010
-08-
12 1
0:10
:06
2010
-08-
12 1
0:29
:03
2010
-08-
12 1
0:48
:00
Amplitude: 518Amplitude: 486Amplitude: 459Amplitude: 432Amplitude: 405Amplitude: 378Amplitude: 351Amplitude: 324Amplitude: 297
No trend in frequency of fluctuations. No trend in frequency of fluctuations.
Trapping reduced by reducing Trapping reduced by reducing strength of OMTsstrength of OMTs
250 300 350 400 450 500 55010
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Ave
rag
e T
rapp
ing
Eff
icie
ncy
Average Extraction EfficiencyAverage Trapping Efficiency
250 300 350 400 450 500 55080
85
90
95
100
105
110
Flat Top Amplitude
Ave
rag
e E
xtra
ctio
n E
ffic
ienc
y
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 1818
Sextupoles/octupoles – results - IIISextupoles/octupoles – results - III
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
80
85
90
95
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Trap
ping
(%
)
Extr
actio
n effi
cien
cy (%
)
Octupoles flat top length (ms)
Averaged Extr. Eff. Averaged trapping
Not a clear trend and not Not a clear trend and not particularly reproducible…particularly reproducible…
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 1919
Sextupoles/octupoles – results - IVSextupoles/octupoles – results - IV
-300 -200 -100 0 100 200 30010
15
20
25
Ave
rag
e T
rapp
ing
Eff
icie
ncy
Average Extraction EfficiencyAverage Trapping Efficiency
-300 -200 -100 0 100 200 30080
85
90
95
100
105
110
h11
Ave
rag
e E
xtra
ctio
n E
ffic
ienc
y
Rather broad optimum Rather broad optimum (around h11=0).(around h11=0).
No effect on frequenciesNo effect on frequencies
yxy
yxx
JhJhQ
JhJhQ
2,01,1
1,10,2
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 2020
Sextupoles/octupoles effect - Sextupoles/octupoles effect - summarysummary
Mild dependence of trapping on OMTs strength Mild dependence of trapping on OMTs strength at top energyat top energyMild dependence of trapping on OMTs flat top Mild dependence of trapping on OMTs flat top lengthlengthBroad optimum of h11 around 0.Broad optimum of h11 around 0.Clear impact of XMT39 strength on trapping Clear impact of XMT39 strength on trapping and frequenciesand frequencies
No strong impact of sectupoles/octupoles on No strong impact of sectupoles/octupoles on amplitude of fluctuations.amplitude of fluctuations.
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 2121
Radial position effectRadial position effect
It changes the beam energyIt changes the beam energyVia feed-down tunes and local chromaticities Via feed-down tunes and local chromaticities are changedare changedTo fix ideas:To fix ideas:
1 mm is equivalent to about 6×101 mm is equivalent to about 6×10-4-4 p/pp/pNegative position -> Negative position -> p/pp/p
y = -8577.6x3 - 965.79x2 + 2.2095x + 0.2466R² = 0.9524
0.244
0.2445
0.245
0.2455
0.246
0.2465
0.247
0.2475
0.248
0.2485
-0.001 -0.0005 0 0.0005 0.001 0.0015 0.002 0.0025
PR.BQSBH
PR.BQSBH
Poly. ( PR.BQSBH)
Large negative second Large negative second order chromaticityorder chromaticity
y = -53729x3 - 98.819x2 + 1.9607x + 0.2997R² = 0.9454
0.296
0.297
0.298
0.299
0.3
0.301
0.302
0.303
-0.002 -0.0015 -0.001 -0.0005 0 0.0005 0.001 0.0015
PR.BQSBV
PR.BQSBV
Poly. ( PR.BQSBV)
Small negative second Small negative second order chromaticityorder chromaticity
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 2222
Radial position effect - resultsRadial position effect - results
10
15
20
25
Ave
rag
e T
rapp
ing
Eff
icie
ncy
MD4_September_11_Vary_Radial_Position
2010
-09-
11 2
1:36
:00
2010
-09-
11 2
2:02
:31
2010
-09-
11 2
2:29
:03
2010
-09-
11 2
2:55
:34
2010
-09-
11 2
3:22
:06
2010
-09-
11 2
3:48
:37
2010
-09-
12 0
0:15
:09
2010
-09-
12 0
0:41
:41
2010
-09-
12 0
1:08
:12
2010
-09-
12 0
1:34
:44
2010
-09-
12 0
2:01
:15
2010
-09-
12 0
2:27
:47
2010
-09-
12 0
2:54
:18
2010
-09-
12 0
3:20
:50
2010
-09-
12 0
3:47
:22
2010
-09-
12 0
4:13
:53
2010
-09-
12 0
4:40
:25
2010
-09-
12 0
5:06
:56
2010
-09-
12 0
5:33
:28
2010
-09-
12 0
6:00
:00
Radial Position @ +2.0 mmRadial Position @ +1.5 mmRadial Position @ +1.0 mmRadial Position @ +0.5 mmRadial Position @ +0.0 mmRadial Position @ -0.5 mmRadial Position @ -1.0 mmRadial Position @ -1.5 mmRadial Position @ -2.0 mmRadial Position @ -2.5 mm
Horizontal chromaticity is Horizontal chromaticity is shifted towards negative valuesshifted towards negative values
Similar change of Similar change of frequency as for XMT39!frequency as for XMT39!
-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 210
15
20
25
Ave
rag
e T
rapp
ing
Eff
icie
ncy
Average Trapping EfficiencyAverage Extraction Efficiency
-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 280
85
90
95
100
105
110
Radial Position [mm]
Ave
rag
e E
xtra
ctio
n E
ffic
ienc
y
Some reduction of Some reduction of fluctuations amplitude fluctuations amplitude for radial position for radial position outside maximum of outside maximum of trappingtrapping
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 2323
Some figuresSome figures
Amplitude of fluctuations is about 3-4%.Amplitude of fluctuations is about 3-4%.From the results of the measurements this From the results of the measurements this could be generated by: could be generated by:
Fluctuation in the start timing of the damper -> 20 msFluctuation in the start timing of the damper -> 20 msFluctuation in the quadrupoles’ settings to generate Fluctuation in the quadrupoles’ settings to generate a jitter of 20 ms in the resonance crossing timinga jitter of 20 ms in the resonance crossing timingFluctuation in the qFluctuation in the qxx value of the damper -> ~2×10 value of the damper -> ~2×10-3-3
Fluctuation in the quadrupoles’ settings to generate Fluctuation in the quadrupoles’ settings to generate a tune fluctuationa tune fluctuationFluctuation in the reference of fFluctuation in the reference of frevrev for the damper -> for the damper -> ~2×10~2×10-4-4 (assuming h=8) (assuming h=8)Fluctuation of the radial position -> ~1 mmFluctuation of the radial position -> ~1 mmFluctuation in beam energy/BFluctuation in beam energy/Bfieldfield -> 0.6×10 -> 0.6×10-3-3
These effects have not b
een found (y
et)
These effects have not b
een found (y
et)
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 2424
Impact of tuneImpact of tune
Tune curve 1Tune curve 1
Tune curve 2Tune curve 2
Tune curve 3Tune curve 3 Tune curve 4Tune curve 4
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 2525
Impact of tune variation – results - IImpact of tune variation – results - I
10
15
20
25
Tra
ppin
g E
ffic
ienc
yMD4_August_12_Vary_Tune_Slope
2010
-08-
12 1
0:48
:00
2010
-08-
12 1
1:25
:53
2010
-08-
12 1
2:03
:47
2010
-08-
12 1
2:41
:41
2010
-08-
12 1
3:19
:34
2010
-08-
12 1
3:57
:28
2010
-08-
12 1
4:35
:22
2010
-08-
12 1
5:13
:15
2010
-08-
12 1
5:51
:09
2010
-08-
12 1
6:29
:03
2010
-08-
12 1
7:06
:56
2010
-08-
12 1
7:44
:50
2010
-08-
12 1
8:22
:44
2010
-08-
12 1
9:00
:37
2010
-08-
12 1
9:38
:31
2010
-08-
12 2
0:16
:25
2010
-08-
12 2
0:54
:18
2010
-08-
12 2
1:32
:12
2010
-08-
12 2
2:10
:06
2010
-08-
12 2
2:48
:00
Before MeasSlope 1Slope 2Slope 3Slope 4Slope 5After Meas
Nominal tune curveNominal tune curve
Tune curve 1Tune curve 1
Tune curve 2Tune curve 2
Tune curve 3Tune curve 3
Tune curve 4Tune curve 4
Slower tune variation seems to give smaller fluctuationsSlower tune variation seems to give smaller fluctuations
PalierPalier in tune curve seems to enhance fluctuations in tune curve seems to enhance fluctuations
To be re-checked…To be re-checked…
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 2626
Impact of intensityImpact of intensity
To assess the impact of intensity on splitting To assess the impact of intensity on splitting behaviour:behaviour:
MD1: initial beam used for SPS setting up. Total MD1: initial beam used for SPS setting up. Total intensity of about 3-4×10intensity of about 3-4×101212 ppp. ppp.MD4: intermediate intensity about 1.7-1.8×10MD4: intermediate intensity about 1.7-1.8×101313 ppp. ppp. MD4: high intensity about 2.1×10MD4: high intensity about 2.1×101313 ppp. ppp.
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 2727
Impact of intensity - summaryImpact of intensity - summary
To assess the impact of intensity on splitting To assess the impact of intensity on splitting behaviour:behaviour:
MD1: initial beam used for SPS setting up. Total MD1: initial beam used for SPS setting up. Total intensity of about 3-4×10intensity of about 3-4×101212 ppp. ppp.MD4: intermediate intensity about 1.7-1.8×10MD4: intermediate intensity about 1.7-1.8×101313 ppp. ppp. MD4: high intensity about 2.1×10MD4: high intensity about 2.1×101313 ppp. ppp.
14
16
18
20
22
24
0 100 200 300 400 500
Trap
ping
effi
cien
cy (%
)
Number of extractions
MD1 - low intensity MD4 - intermediate intensity MD4 - high intensity
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 2828
Impact of intensity – results - IImpact of intensity – results - I
0
5
10
15
20
2515
.015
.415
.816
.216
.617
.017
.417
.818
.218
.619
.019
.419
.820
.220
.621
.021
.421
.822
.222
.623
.023
.423
.824
.224
.625
.0
Freq
uenc
y (%
)
Trapping efficiency (%)
MD1 - low intensity
MD4- intermediate intensity
MD4 - high intensityMD1 - low MD1 - low intensityintensity
MD4 - MD4 - intermediate intermediate
intensityintensityMD4 - high MD4 - high
intensityintensityMeanMean 19.4919.49 18.6318.63 19.6519.65Standard Standard DeviationDeviation 0.960.96 0.600.60 1.221.22KurtosisKurtosis 0.730.73 -0.03-0.03 -0.35-0.35SkewnessSkewness -0.44-0.44 -0.70-0.70 -0.69-0.69RangeRange 9.299.29 2.682.68 5.145.14MinimumMinimum 13.2213.22 17.0117.01 16.2916.29MaximumMaximum 22.5122.51 19.6919.69 21.4321.43CountCount 47034703 6262 411411
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 2929
Impact of intensity – results - IIImpact of intensity – results - II
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07T
rapp
ing
Eff
icie
ncy
[%]F
requ
ency
[H
z]
MD1_SpillMD4_Spill_High_IntensityMD4_Spill_Intermediate
Some dependence on intensity Some dependence on intensity for the fluctuations’ frequencies for the fluctuations’ frequencies
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 3030
Other checks: magnets pulsing on Other checks: magnets pulsing on zero cycle zero cycle
Test to assess impact of MTE elements pulsing Test to assess impact of MTE elements pulsing on other users.on other users.Selected ZERO cycle.Selected ZERO cycle.Copied:Copied:
XMTsXMTsOMTsOMTsLow energy quadrupolesLow energy quadrupoles
No impact at all on trapping and fluctuationsNo impact at all on trapping and fluctuations
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 3131
Other checks: magnets pulsing – Other checks: magnets pulsing – resultsresults
Mild dependence of trapping on OMTs strength Mild dependence of trapping on OMTs strength at top energyat top energyMild dependence of trapping on OMTs flat top Mild dependence of trapping on OMTs flat top lengthlengthBroad optimum of h11 around 0.Broad optimum of h11 around 0.Clear impact of XMT39 strength on trapping Clear impact of XMT39 strength on trapping and frequenciesand frequencies
No strong impact of sectupoles/octupoles on No strong impact of sectupoles/octupoles on amplitude of fluctuations.amplitude of fluctuations.
10
15
20
25
Ave
rag
e T
rapp
ing
Eff
icie
ncy
Nomina
l MTE
PPM C
opy o
f OM
T, X
MT
, and
Qlow
from
MD4
to Z
ero
for t
est
Mod
ifcat
ion
Resto
red
Inte
nsity
: 1.8
e13
Nomina
l MTE
Average Trapping EfficiencyAverage Extraction Efficiency
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
Ave
rag
e E
xtra
ctio
n E
ffic
ienc
y
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 3232
Global overview of studies - IGlobal overview of studies - I
10
15
20
25
Ave
rag
e T
rapp
ing
Eff
icie
ncy
Zone
Each colour represents a different study.Each colour represents a different study.
The sample has not exactly the same size for all studiesThe sample has not exactly the same size for all studies
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 3333
Global overview of studies - IIGlobal overview of studies - II
0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.613
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Trapping Efficiency
Tra
ppin
g E
ffic
ienc
y
No correlation between No correlation between average trapping and average trapping and amplitude of fluctuations!amplitude of fluctuations!
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 3434
Global overview of studies - IIIGlobal overview of studies - IIITrapping efficiencyTrapping efficiency
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06Compare Trapping Efficiency Significant Frequencies
Fre
que
ncy
[Hz]
Zone
50 s50 s
~1000 s~1000 s
Trapping efficiencyTrapping efficiency
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 3535
Global overview of studies - IIIGlobal overview of studies - III
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06Compare Extraction Efficiency Significant Frequencies
Fre
que
ncy
[Hz]
Zone
Extraction efficiencyExtraction efficiency
50 s50 s
~1000 s~1000 s
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 3636
Global overview of studies - IVGlobal overview of studies - IV
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.20
0.00
00
0.00
25
0.00
50
0.00
75
0.01
00
0.01
25
0.01
50
0.01
75
0.02
00
0.02
25
0.02
50
0.02
75
0.03
00
0.03
25
0.03
50
0.03
75
0.04
00
0.04
25
0.04
50
0.04
75
0.05
00
0.05
25
0.05
50
0.05
75
0.06
00
Freq
uenc
y (%
)
Frequency (Hz)
Extraction efficiency Trapping efficiency
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 3737
Comments on BCTs in TT2Comments on BCTs in TT2
Devices normally used for MTE studies:Devices normally used for MTE studies:PS ring transformer (reference)PS ring transformer (reference)FBCT in 212 (spill and total intensity)FBCT in 212 (spill and total intensity)BCT372 (total intensity)BCT372 (total intensity)
Recently additional data should be available:Recently additional data should be available:126, 203, 372 -> spill data126, 203, 372 -> spill dataAll BCTs providing total intensityAll BCTs providing total intensity
In principle everything should be logged.In principle everything should be logged.Cross-calibration still to be improvedCross-calibration still to be improvedLogging to be verifiedLogging to be verified
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2
2.1
2.2
2.3x 10
13
Inte
nsity
MD4_September_16_Noise
2010
-09-
16 1
4:52
:48
2010
-09-
16 1
5:01
:53
2010
-09-
16 1
5:10
:59
2010
-09-
16 1
5:20
:05
2010
-09-
16 1
5:29
:10
2010
-09-
16 1
5:38
:16
2010
-09-
16 1
5:47
:22
2010
-09-
16 1
5:56
:27
2010
-09-
16 1
6:05
:33
2010
-09-
16 1
6:14
:39
2010
-09-
16 1
6:23
:44
2010
-09-
16 1
6:32
:50
2010
-09-
16 1
6:41
:56
2010
-09-
16 1
6:51
:01
2010
-09-
16 1
7:00
:07
2010
-09-
16 1
7:09
:13
2010
-09-
16 1
7:18
:18
2010
-09-
16 1
7:27
:24
2010
-09-
16 1
7:36
:30
2010
-09-
16 1
7:45
:36
372126 SUMBEFEJE1_INTTotal Charge: TRA212
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 3838
OutlookOutlook
Detailed studies of the dependence of the trapping on Detailed studies of the dependence of the trapping on many parameters done.many parameters done.Optimisation done for: Optimisation done for:
damper settingsdamper settingssextupolessextupolesoctupoles octupoles radial positionradial position
Still some studies to be performed with the variation of Still some studies to be performed with the variation of the tune with time.the tune with time.Fluctuations are still there:Fluctuations are still there:
They seem intrinsic to the splitting processThey seem intrinsic to the splitting processThey are not affected by the damperThey are not affected by the damperThey are generated during the splitting properThey are generated during the splitting properFluctuations amplitude: not particularly affected by the Fluctuations amplitude: not particularly affected by the parameters analysed so farparameters analysed so farFluctuations frequency: seems to be affected by chromaticity Fluctuations frequency: seems to be affected by chromaticity and intensityand intensity