+ All Categories
Home > Documents > MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman...

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman...

Date post: 11-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: eustacia-gibson
View: 212 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
38
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 1 Measurements’ analysis Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Newman Introduction Introduction Techniques, tools Techniques, tools Results (selected) Results (selected) Outlook Outlook Acknowledgements Acknowledgements : G. Arduini, H. Damerau, E. : G. Arduini, H. Damerau, E. Métral, and Métral, and OP-PS crew!!! OP-PS crew!!!
Transcript
Page 1: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 11

Measurements’ analysisMeasurements’ analysis

S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. NewmanS. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman

IntroductionIntroduction

Techniques, toolsTechniques, tools

Results (selected)Results (selected)

OutlookOutlook

AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements: G. Arduini, H. Damerau, E. Métral, and: G. Arduini, H. Damerau, E. Métral, and

OP-PS crew!!!OP-PS crew!!!

Page 2: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 22

Introduction - IIntroduction - I

Aim of these studies:Aim of these studies:Optimisation of various parameters Optimisation of various parameters Identification of sources (beam dynamics) of trapping Identification of sources (beam dynamics) of trapping fluctuationsfluctuations

Instruments used:Instruments used:Mainly transformers in TT2 to evaluate extraction and Mainly transformers in TT2 to evaluate extraction and trapping efficiency trapping efficiency

BCTFI212: spill shape and total intensityBCTFI212: spill shape and total intensityBCT372: total intensityBCT372: total intensity

Wire scanner to evaluate islands’ parameters and Wire scanner to evaluate islands’ parameters and trapping efficiencytrapping efficiencyScreens in TT2 to evaluate position fluctuations and Screens in TT2 to evaluate position fluctuations and emittance/sigma variationemittance/sigma variation

Page 3: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 33

Introduction - IIIntroduction - II

General approachGeneral approachPerform scans over selected parametersPerform scans over selected parametersEstimate trapping/extraction efficiency Estimate trapping/extraction efficiency Compute average/standard deviation of Compute average/standard deviation of trapping/extraction vs. parameter testedtrapping/extraction vs. parameter testedEvaluate correlation between trapping/extraction Evaluate correlation between trapping/extraction efficienciesefficienciesEvaluate frequencies in time-evolution of Evaluate frequencies in time-evolution of trapping/extraction efficiencytrapping/extraction efficiency

Plain FFT not always applicable (not evenly-spaced data)Plain FFT not always applicable (not evenly-spaced data)Lomb periodogramme usedLomb periodogramme used

Equivalent to fitting sine/cosine functions to measured dataEquivalent to fitting sine/cosine functions to measured dataFigure-of-merit function suitable for statistical interpretation: Figure-of-merit function suitable for statistical interpretation: significance level of fit frequencies.significance level of fit frequencies.

Page 4: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 44

Introduction - IIIIntroduction - III

Key beam/machine parametersKey beam/machine parametersTune:Tune:

Resonance crossingResonance crossingControl of adiabaticity of whole processControl of adiabaticity of whole process

Sextupoles/octupolesSextupoles/octupolesIslands’ generationIslands’ generationSeparationSeparationAdiabaticity Adiabaticity

Damper:Damper:Used to increase trapping (by increasing horizontal Used to increase trapping (by increasing horizontal particles’ amplitude)particles’ amplitude)..

Page 5: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 55

When are the fluctuations When are the fluctuations generated? – results - Igenerated? – results - I

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

-30 -20 -10 0 10 20

Am

plitu

de (

A.U

.)

Position (mm)

7/2/2010 12:12 7/2/2010 12:13 7/2/2010 12:13 7/2/2010 12:14 7/2/2010 12:15

7/2/2010 12:16 7/2/2010 12:16 7/2/2010 12:17 7/2/2010 12:18 7/2/2010 12:20

y = 0.6559x + 7.4148R² = 0.721

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

90

92

94

96

98

100

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Trap

ping

fra

ction

(%)

Extr

actio

n effi

cien

cy (%

)

Trapping fraction from wire scanner (%)

Extraction eff. Capture TRA212

C760 msC760 ms

Hard multi-Gaussian fit!Hard multi-Gaussian fit!

Page 6: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 66

When are the fluctuations When are the fluctuations generated? – results - Igenerated? – results - I

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

-30 -20 -10 0 10 20

Am

plitu

de (

A.U

.)

Position (mm)

7/2/2010 11:56 7/2/2010 11:57 7/2/2010 11:57 7/2/2010 11:58 7/2/2010 11:59 7/2/2010 12:03

7/2/2010 12:03 7/2/2010 12:04 7/2/2010 12:05 7/2/2010 12:06 7/2/2010 12:08 7/2/2010 12:10

y = 0.8809x + 2.6177R² = 0.7802

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

90

92

94

96

98

100

10 12 14 16 18 20 22

Trap

ping

fra

ction

from

(%)

Extr

actio

n effi

cien

cy (%

)

Trapping fraction from wire scanner (%)

Extraction eff.Capture TRA212

C790 msC790 ms

Easier multi-Gaussian fit!Easier multi-Gaussian fit!

Page 7: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 77

When are the fluctuations When are the fluctuations generated? - conclusionsgenerated? - conclusions

Taking into account thatTaking into account thatIt is not possible to collect too much statistics with It is not possible to collect too much statistics with wire scannerswire scannersThe five-Gaussian fit might be hard to perform when The five-Gaussian fit might be hard to perform when the islands are not well separatedthe islands are not well separated

Then, the fluctuations seem to be generated Then, the fluctuations seem to be generated right at the beginning of the splitting.right at the beginning of the splitting.

Page 8: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 88

Damper effectDamper effect

Principle:Principle:It excites the beam at an harmonic (h) of the betatron It excites the beam at an harmonic (h) of the betatron frequencyfrequencyIt excites the beam at a given tune valueIt excites the beam at a given tune valueIn summary:In summary:

ffdamperdamper=f=frevrev (h+q (h+qxx))Other parametersOther parameters

Kick amplitudeKick amplitudeStart and end times of excitationStart and end times of excitationOther excitation formsOther excitation forms

Page 9: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 99

Damper effect – results - IDamper effect – results - I

Principle:Principle:It excites the beam at an harmonic (h) of the betatron It excites the beam at an harmonic (h) of the betatron frequencyfrequencyIt excites the beam at a given tune valueIt excites the beam at a given tune valueIn summary:In summary:

ffdamperdamper=f=frevrev (h+q (h+qxx))Other parametersOther parameters

Kick amplitudeKick amplitudeStart and end times of excitationStart and end times of excitationOther excitation formsOther excitation forms

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

90

92

94

96

98

100

102

104

106

108

110

0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000

Trap

ping

(%

)

Extr

actio

n effi

cien

cy (%

)

Time difference (s)

Average Extr. Eff.

Trapping (h=25)

Trapping (h=16)

Trapping (h=15)

Trapping (h=17)

Trapping (h=7)

Trapping (h=9)

Trapping (h=8)

August 4August 410

12

14

16

18

20

22

90

92

94

96

98

100

102

104

106

108

110

0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000

Trap

ping

(%

)

Extr

actio

n effi

cien

cy (%

)

Time difference (s)

Average Extr. Eff.

Trapping (h=7)

Trapping (h=8)

Trapping (h=16)

August 8August 8

Page 10: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 1010

Damper effect – results - IIDamper effect – results - II

Principle:Principle:It excites the beam at an harmonic (h) of the betatron It excites the beam at an harmonic (h) of the betatron frequencyfrequencyIt excites the beam at a given tune valueIt excites the beam at a given tune valueIn summary:In summary:

ffdamperdamper=f=frevrev (h+q (h+qxx))Other parametersOther parameters

Kick amplitudeKick amplitudeStart and end times of excitationStart and end times of excitationOther excitation formsOther excitation forms

10

12

14

16

18

20

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

690 700 710 720 730 740 750 760

Trap

ping

(%

)

Extr

actio

n effi

cien

cy (%

)

Excitation start (ms)

Averaged Extr. Eff. Averaged trapping

Resonance is crossed around 720 msResonance is crossed around 720 ms

Page 11: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 1111

Damper effect – results - IIIDamper effect – results - III

Principle:Principle:It excites the beam at an harmonic (h) of the betatron It excites the beam at an harmonic (h) of the betatron frequencyfrequencyIt excites the beam at a given tune valueIt excites the beam at a given tune valueIn summary:In summary:

ffdamperdamper=f=frevrev (h+q (h+qxx))Other parametersOther parameters

Kick amplitudeKick amplitudeStart and end times of excitationStart and end times of excitationOther excitation formsOther excitation forms

10

12

14

16

18

20

93.0

93.5

94.0

94.5

95.0

95.5

96.0

96.5

97.0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Trap

ping

(%

)

Extr

actio

n effi

cien

cy (%

)

Excitation length (ms)

Averaged Extr. Eff. Averaged trapping

Broad maximum: length minimised to avoid Broad maximum: length minimised to avoid emittance blow-upemittance blow-up

Page 12: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 1212

Damper effect – results - IVDamper effect – results - IV

Principle:Principle:It excites the beam at an harmonic (h) of the betatron It excites the beam at an harmonic (h) of the betatron frequencyfrequencyIt excites the beam at a given tune valueIt excites the beam at a given tune valueIn summary:In summary:

ffdamperdamper=f=frevrev (h+q (h+qxx))Other parametersOther parameters

Kick amplitudeKick amplitudeStart and end times of excitationStart and end times of excitationOther excitation formsOther excitation forms

Broad maximum: length minimised to avoid Broad maximum: length minimised to avoid emittance blow-upemittance blow-up

0.245 0.246 0.247 0.248 0.249 0.25 0.251 0.252 0.253 0.254 0.25510

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

Ave

rag

e T

rapp

ing

Eff

icie

ncy

Average Extraction EfficiencyAverage Trapping Efficiency

0.245 0.246 0.247 0.248 0.249 0.25 0.251 0.252 0.253 0.254 0.25580

85

90

95

100

105

110

Tune

Ave

rag

e E

xtra

ctio

n E

ffic

ienc

y

Page 13: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 1313

Damper effect – results - VDamper effect – results - V

Principle:Principle:It excites the beam at an harmonic (h) of the betatron It excites the beam at an harmonic (h) of the betatron frequencyfrequencyIt excites the beam at a given tune valueIt excites the beam at a given tune valueIn summary:In summary:

ffdamperdamper=f=frevrev (h+q (h+qxx))Other parametersOther parameters

Kick amplitudeKick amplitudeStart and end times of excitationStart and end times of excitationOther excitation formsOther excitation forms

Broad maximum: length minimised to avoid Broad maximum: length minimised to avoid emittance blow-upemittance blow-up10

15

20

25

Ave

rag

e T

rapp

ing

Eff

icie

ncy

MD4_July_12_Damper_Study

Damper On Excite On

Damper On Excite Off

Normal MTEDamper OnExcite Off

Damper OffExcite Off

Damper OffExcite On

Various Various configurations configurations of damper of damper ON/OFF: clear ON/OFF: clear impact on impact on trapping; no trapping; no impact on impact on fluctuationsfluctuations

Page 14: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 1414

Damper effect - summaryDamper effect - summary

Mild dependence of trapping on h -> Mild dependence of trapping on h -> selected selected h=8h=8Strong dependence of trapping on qx -> Strong dependence of trapping on qx -> selected qx=0.25selected qx=0.25Threshold effects on start excitation -> Threshold effects on start excitation -> selected 700 msselected 700 msBroad optimum for excitation length -> Broad optimum for excitation length -> selected 40 msselected 40 msEssentially no impact of other options (type of Essentially no impact of other options (type of modulation, slope in qx vs. time)modulation, slope in qx vs. time)

Strong impact on trapping efficiency of damper, Strong impact on trapping efficiency of damper, but no impact on fluctuations.but no impact on fluctuations.

Page 15: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 1515

Sextupoles/octupoles effectSextupoles/octupoles effect

ODEs are used to compensate the non-linear ODEs are used to compensate the non-linear coupling between H/V plane. coupling between H/V plane. Sextupoles should not generate negative Sextupoles should not generate negative chromaticity (increasing their strengths reduces chromaticity (increasing their strengths reduces chromaticity)!chromaticity)!

-600

-400

-200

0

200

400

600

0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.0

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2

Curr

ents

(A)

B-fie

ld (T

)

Cycle time (s)

B-field Sextupole 39Sextupole 55 Octupole 39Octupole 55 Octupoles

Page 16: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 1616

Sextupoles/octupoles – results - ISextupoles/octupoles – results - I

ODEs are used to compensate the non-linear ODEs are used to compensate the non-linear coupling between H/V plane. coupling between H/V plane. Sextupoles should not generate negative Sextupoles should not generate negative chromaticity (increasing their strengths reduces chromaticity (increasing their strengths reduces chromaticity)!chromaticity)!

10

15

20

25

Ave

rag

e T

rapp

ing

Eff

icie

ncy

MD4_July6_scan_XMT39

2010

-07-

06 2

1:36

:00

2010

-07-

06 2

2:02

:31

2010

-07-

06 2

2:29

:03

2010

-07-

06 2

2:55

:34

2010

-07-

06 2

3:22

:06

2010

-07-

06 2

3:48

:37

2010

-07-

07 0

0:15

:09

2010

-07-

07 0

0:41

:41

2010

-07-

07 0

1:08

:12

2010

-07-

07 0

1:34

:44

2010

-07-

07 0

2:01

:15

2010

-07-

07 0

2:27

:47

2010

-07-

07 0

2:54

:18

2010

-07-

07 0

3:20

:50

2010

-07-

07 0

3:47

:22

2010

-07-

07 0

4:13

:53

2010

-07-

07 0

4:40

:25

2010

-07-

07 0

5:06

:56

2010

-07-

07 0

5:33

:28

2010

-07-

07 0

6:00

:00

XMT39: 10XMT39: 30XMT39: 50XMT39: 70XMT39: 90XMT39: 110XMT39: 130XMT39: 150XMT39: 160

Change of frequency of Change of frequency of fluctuations (rarely seen in the fluctuations (rarely seen in the whole measurement campaign)!whole measurement campaign)!

Limit of negative Limit of negative chromaticitychromaticity

Page 17: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 1717

Sextupoles/octupoles – results - IISextupoles/octupoles – results - II

ODEs are used to compensate the non-linear ODEs are used to compensate the non-linear coupling between H/V plane. coupling between H/V plane. Sextupoles should not generate negative Sextupoles should not generate negative chromaticity (increasing their strengths reduces chromaticity (increasing their strengths reduces chromaticity)!chromaticity)!

10

15

20

25

Ave

rag

e T

rapp

ing

Eff

icie

ncy

MD4_August_12_scan_octupoles_amplitude

2010

-08-

12 0

4:48

:00

2010

-08-

12 0

5:06

:56

2010

-08-

12 0

5:25

:53

2010

-08-

12 0

5:44

:50

2010

-08-

12 0

6:03

:47

2010

-08-

12 0

6:22

:44

2010

-08-

12 0

6:41

:41

2010

-08-

12 0

7:00

:37

2010

-08-

12 0

7:19

:34

2010

-08-

12 0

7:38

:31

2010

-08-

12 0

7:57

:28

2010

-08-

12 0

8:16

:25

2010

-08-

12 0

8:35

:22

2010

-08-

12 0

8:54

:18

2010

-08-

12 0

9:13

:15

2010

-08-

12 0

9:32

:12

2010

-08-

12 0

9:51

:09

2010

-08-

12 1

0:10

:06

2010

-08-

12 1

0:29

:03

2010

-08-

12 1

0:48

:00

Amplitude: 518Amplitude: 486Amplitude: 459Amplitude: 432Amplitude: 405Amplitude: 378Amplitude: 351Amplitude: 324Amplitude: 297

No trend in frequency of fluctuations. No trend in frequency of fluctuations.

Trapping reduced by reducing Trapping reduced by reducing strength of OMTsstrength of OMTs

250 300 350 400 450 500 55010

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

Ave

rag

e T

rapp

ing

Eff

icie

ncy

Average Extraction EfficiencyAverage Trapping Efficiency

250 300 350 400 450 500 55080

85

90

95

100

105

110

Flat Top Amplitude

Ave

rag

e E

xtra

ctio

n E

ffic

ienc

y

Page 18: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 1818

Sextupoles/octupoles – results - IIISextupoles/octupoles – results - III

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

80

85

90

95

100

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Trap

ping

(%

)

Extr

actio

n effi

cien

cy (%

)

Octupoles flat top length (ms)

Averaged Extr. Eff. Averaged trapping

Not a clear trend and not Not a clear trend and not particularly reproducible…particularly reproducible…

Page 19: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 1919

Sextupoles/octupoles – results - IVSextupoles/octupoles – results - IV

-300 -200 -100 0 100 200 30010

15

20

25

Ave

rag

e T

rapp

ing

Eff

icie

ncy

Average Extraction EfficiencyAverage Trapping Efficiency

-300 -200 -100 0 100 200 30080

85

90

95

100

105

110

h11

Ave

rag

e E

xtra

ctio

n E

ffic

ienc

y

Rather broad optimum Rather broad optimum (around h11=0).(around h11=0).

No effect on frequenciesNo effect on frequencies

yxy

yxx

JhJhQ

JhJhQ

2,01,1

1,10,2

Page 20: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 2020

Sextupoles/octupoles effect - Sextupoles/octupoles effect - summarysummary

Mild dependence of trapping on OMTs strength Mild dependence of trapping on OMTs strength at top energyat top energyMild dependence of trapping on OMTs flat top Mild dependence of trapping on OMTs flat top lengthlengthBroad optimum of h11 around 0.Broad optimum of h11 around 0.Clear impact of XMT39 strength on trapping Clear impact of XMT39 strength on trapping and frequenciesand frequencies

No strong impact of sectupoles/octupoles on No strong impact of sectupoles/octupoles on amplitude of fluctuations.amplitude of fluctuations.

Page 21: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 2121

Radial position effectRadial position effect

It changes the beam energyIt changes the beam energyVia feed-down tunes and local chromaticities Via feed-down tunes and local chromaticities are changedare changedTo fix ideas:To fix ideas:

1 mm is equivalent to about 6×101 mm is equivalent to about 6×10-4-4 p/pp/pNegative position -> Negative position -> p/pp/p

y = -8577.6x3 - 965.79x2 + 2.2095x + 0.2466R² = 0.9524

0.244

0.2445

0.245

0.2455

0.246

0.2465

0.247

0.2475

0.248

0.2485

-0.001 -0.0005 0 0.0005 0.001 0.0015 0.002 0.0025

PR.BQSBH

PR.BQSBH

Poly. ( PR.BQSBH)

Large negative second Large negative second order chromaticityorder chromaticity

y = -53729x3 - 98.819x2 + 1.9607x + 0.2997R² = 0.9454

0.296

0.297

0.298

0.299

0.3

0.301

0.302

0.303

-0.002 -0.0015 -0.001 -0.0005 0 0.0005 0.001 0.0015

PR.BQSBV

PR.BQSBV

Poly. ( PR.BQSBV)

Small negative second Small negative second order chromaticityorder chromaticity

Page 22: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 2222

Radial position effect - resultsRadial position effect - results

10

15

20

25

Ave

rag

e T

rapp

ing

Eff

icie

ncy

MD4_September_11_Vary_Radial_Position

2010

-09-

11 2

1:36

:00

2010

-09-

11 2

2:02

:31

2010

-09-

11 2

2:29

:03

2010

-09-

11 2

2:55

:34

2010

-09-

11 2

3:22

:06

2010

-09-

11 2

3:48

:37

2010

-09-

12 0

0:15

:09

2010

-09-

12 0

0:41

:41

2010

-09-

12 0

1:08

:12

2010

-09-

12 0

1:34

:44

2010

-09-

12 0

2:01

:15

2010

-09-

12 0

2:27

:47

2010

-09-

12 0

2:54

:18

2010

-09-

12 0

3:20

:50

2010

-09-

12 0

3:47

:22

2010

-09-

12 0

4:13

:53

2010

-09-

12 0

4:40

:25

2010

-09-

12 0

5:06

:56

2010

-09-

12 0

5:33

:28

2010

-09-

12 0

6:00

:00

Radial Position @ +2.0 mmRadial Position @ +1.5 mmRadial Position @ +1.0 mmRadial Position @ +0.5 mmRadial Position @ +0.0 mmRadial Position @ -0.5 mmRadial Position @ -1.0 mmRadial Position @ -1.5 mmRadial Position @ -2.0 mmRadial Position @ -2.5 mm

Horizontal chromaticity is Horizontal chromaticity is shifted towards negative valuesshifted towards negative values

Similar change of Similar change of frequency as for XMT39!frequency as for XMT39!

-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 210

15

20

25

Ave

rag

e T

rapp

ing

Eff

icie

ncy

Average Trapping EfficiencyAverage Extraction Efficiency

-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 280

85

90

95

100

105

110

Radial Position [mm]

Ave

rag

e E

xtra

ctio

n E

ffic

ienc

y

Some reduction of Some reduction of fluctuations amplitude fluctuations amplitude for radial position for radial position outside maximum of outside maximum of trappingtrapping

Page 23: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 2323

Some figuresSome figures

Amplitude of fluctuations is about 3-4%.Amplitude of fluctuations is about 3-4%.From the results of the measurements this From the results of the measurements this could be generated by: could be generated by:

Fluctuation in the start timing of the damper -> 20 msFluctuation in the start timing of the damper -> 20 msFluctuation in the quadrupoles’ settings to generate Fluctuation in the quadrupoles’ settings to generate a jitter of 20 ms in the resonance crossing timinga jitter of 20 ms in the resonance crossing timingFluctuation in the qFluctuation in the qxx value of the damper -> ~2×10 value of the damper -> ~2×10-3-3

Fluctuation in the quadrupoles’ settings to generate Fluctuation in the quadrupoles’ settings to generate a tune fluctuationa tune fluctuationFluctuation in the reference of fFluctuation in the reference of frevrev for the damper -> for the damper -> ~2×10~2×10-4-4 (assuming h=8) (assuming h=8)Fluctuation of the radial position -> ~1 mmFluctuation of the radial position -> ~1 mmFluctuation in beam energy/BFluctuation in beam energy/Bfieldfield -> 0.6×10 -> 0.6×10-3-3

These effects have not b

een found (y

et)

These effects have not b

een found (y

et)

Page 24: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 2424

Impact of tuneImpact of tune

Tune curve 1Tune curve 1

Tune curve 2Tune curve 2

Tune curve 3Tune curve 3 Tune curve 4Tune curve 4

Page 25: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 2525

Impact of tune variation – results - IImpact of tune variation – results - I

10

15

20

25

Tra

ppin

g E

ffic

ienc

yMD4_August_12_Vary_Tune_Slope

2010

-08-

12 1

0:48

:00

2010

-08-

12 1

1:25

:53

2010

-08-

12 1

2:03

:47

2010

-08-

12 1

2:41

:41

2010

-08-

12 1

3:19

:34

2010

-08-

12 1

3:57

:28

2010

-08-

12 1

4:35

:22

2010

-08-

12 1

5:13

:15

2010

-08-

12 1

5:51

:09

2010

-08-

12 1

6:29

:03

2010

-08-

12 1

7:06

:56

2010

-08-

12 1

7:44

:50

2010

-08-

12 1

8:22

:44

2010

-08-

12 1

9:00

:37

2010

-08-

12 1

9:38

:31

2010

-08-

12 2

0:16

:25

2010

-08-

12 2

0:54

:18

2010

-08-

12 2

1:32

:12

2010

-08-

12 2

2:10

:06

2010

-08-

12 2

2:48

:00

Before MeasSlope 1Slope 2Slope 3Slope 4Slope 5After Meas

Nominal tune curveNominal tune curve

Tune curve 1Tune curve 1

Tune curve 2Tune curve 2

Tune curve 3Tune curve 3

Tune curve 4Tune curve 4

Slower tune variation seems to give smaller fluctuationsSlower tune variation seems to give smaller fluctuations

PalierPalier in tune curve seems to enhance fluctuations in tune curve seems to enhance fluctuations

To be re-checked…To be re-checked…

Page 26: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 2626

Impact of intensityImpact of intensity

To assess the impact of intensity on splitting To assess the impact of intensity on splitting behaviour:behaviour:

MD1: initial beam used for SPS setting up. Total MD1: initial beam used for SPS setting up. Total intensity of about 3-4×10intensity of about 3-4×101212 ppp. ppp.MD4: intermediate intensity about 1.7-1.8×10MD4: intermediate intensity about 1.7-1.8×101313 ppp. ppp. MD4: high intensity about 2.1×10MD4: high intensity about 2.1×101313 ppp. ppp.

Page 27: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 2727

Impact of intensity - summaryImpact of intensity - summary

To assess the impact of intensity on splitting To assess the impact of intensity on splitting behaviour:behaviour:

MD1: initial beam used for SPS setting up. Total MD1: initial beam used for SPS setting up. Total intensity of about 3-4×10intensity of about 3-4×101212 ppp. ppp.MD4: intermediate intensity about 1.7-1.8×10MD4: intermediate intensity about 1.7-1.8×101313 ppp. ppp. MD4: high intensity about 2.1×10MD4: high intensity about 2.1×101313 ppp. ppp.

14

16

18

20

22

24

0 100 200 300 400 500

Trap

ping

effi

cien

cy (%

)

Number of extractions

MD1 - low intensity MD4 - intermediate intensity MD4 - high intensity

Page 28: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 2828

Impact of intensity – results - IImpact of intensity – results - I

0

5

10

15

20

2515

.015

.415

.816

.216

.617

.017

.417

.818

.218

.619

.019

.419

.820

.220

.621

.021

.421

.822

.222

.623

.023

.423

.824

.224

.625

.0

Freq

uenc

y (%

)

Trapping efficiency (%)

MD1 - low intensity

MD4- intermediate intensity

MD4 - high intensityMD1 - low MD1 - low intensityintensity

MD4 - MD4 - intermediate intermediate

intensityintensityMD4 - high MD4 - high

intensityintensityMeanMean 19.4919.49 18.6318.63 19.6519.65Standard Standard DeviationDeviation 0.960.96 0.600.60 1.221.22KurtosisKurtosis 0.730.73 -0.03-0.03 -0.35-0.35SkewnessSkewness -0.44-0.44 -0.70-0.70 -0.69-0.69RangeRange 9.299.29 2.682.68 5.145.14MinimumMinimum 13.2213.22 17.0117.01 16.2916.29MaximumMaximum 22.5122.51 19.6919.69 21.4321.43CountCount 47034703 6262 411411

Page 29: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 2929

Impact of intensity – results - IIImpact of intensity – results - II

0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07T

rapp

ing

Eff

icie

ncy

[%]F

requ

ency

[H

z]

MD1_SpillMD4_Spill_High_IntensityMD4_Spill_Intermediate

Some dependence on intensity Some dependence on intensity for the fluctuations’ frequencies for the fluctuations’ frequencies

Page 30: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 3030

Other checks: magnets pulsing on Other checks: magnets pulsing on zero cycle zero cycle

Test to assess impact of MTE elements pulsing Test to assess impact of MTE elements pulsing on other users.on other users.Selected ZERO cycle.Selected ZERO cycle.Copied:Copied:

XMTsXMTsOMTsOMTsLow energy quadrupolesLow energy quadrupoles

No impact at all on trapping and fluctuationsNo impact at all on trapping and fluctuations

Page 31: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 3131

Other checks: magnets pulsing – Other checks: magnets pulsing – resultsresults

Mild dependence of trapping on OMTs strength Mild dependence of trapping on OMTs strength at top energyat top energyMild dependence of trapping on OMTs flat top Mild dependence of trapping on OMTs flat top lengthlengthBroad optimum of h11 around 0.Broad optimum of h11 around 0.Clear impact of XMT39 strength on trapping Clear impact of XMT39 strength on trapping and frequenciesand frequencies

No strong impact of sectupoles/octupoles on No strong impact of sectupoles/octupoles on amplitude of fluctuations.amplitude of fluctuations.

10

15

20

25

Ave

rag

e T

rapp

ing

Eff

icie

ncy

Nomina

l MTE

PPM C

opy o

f OM

T, X

MT

, and

Qlow

from

MD4

to Z

ero

for t

est

Mod

ifcat

ion

Resto

red

Inte

nsity

: 1.8

e13

Nomina

l MTE

Average Trapping EfficiencyAverage Extraction Efficiency

80

85

90

95

100

105

110

Ave

rag

e E

xtra

ctio

n E

ffic

ienc

y

Page 32: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 3232

Global overview of studies - IGlobal overview of studies - I

10

15

20

25

Ave

rag

e T

rapp

ing

Eff

icie

ncy

Zone

Each colour represents a different study.Each colour represents a different study.

The sample has not exactly the same size for all studiesThe sample has not exactly the same size for all studies

Page 33: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 3333

Global overview of studies - IIGlobal overview of studies - II

0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.613

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

Trapping Efficiency

Tra

ppin

g E

ffic

ienc

y

No correlation between No correlation between average trapping and average trapping and amplitude of fluctuations!amplitude of fluctuations!

Page 34: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 3434

Global overview of studies - IIIGlobal overview of studies - IIITrapping efficiencyTrapping efficiency

0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06Compare Trapping Efficiency Significant Frequencies

Fre

que

ncy

[Hz]

Zone

50 s50 s

~1000 s~1000 s

Trapping efficiencyTrapping efficiency

Page 35: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 3535

Global overview of studies - IIIGlobal overview of studies - III

0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06Compare Extraction Efficiency Significant Frequencies

Fre

que

ncy

[Hz]

Zone

Extraction efficiencyExtraction efficiency

50 s50 s

~1000 s~1000 s

Page 36: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 3636

Global overview of studies - IVGlobal overview of studies - IV

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.20

0.00

00

0.00

25

0.00

50

0.00

75

0.01

00

0.01

25

0.01

50

0.01

75

0.02

00

0.02

25

0.02

50

0.02

75

0.03

00

0.03

25

0.03

50

0.03

75

0.04

00

0.04

25

0.04

50

0.04

75

0.05

00

0.05

25

0.05

50

0.05

75

0.06

00

Freq

uenc

y (%

)

Frequency (Hz)

Extraction efficiency Trapping efficiency

Page 37: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 3737

Comments on BCTs in TT2Comments on BCTs in TT2

Devices normally used for MTE studies:Devices normally used for MTE studies:PS ring transformer (reference)PS ring transformer (reference)FBCT in 212 (spill and total intensity)FBCT in 212 (spill and total intensity)BCT372 (total intensity)BCT372 (total intensity)

Recently additional data should be available:Recently additional data should be available:126, 203, 372 -> spill data126, 203, 372 -> spill dataAll BCTs providing total intensityAll BCTs providing total intensity

In principle everything should be logged.In principle everything should be logged.Cross-calibration still to be improvedCross-calibration still to be improvedLogging to be verifiedLogging to be verified

1.5

1.6

1.7

1.8

1.9

2

2.1

2.2

2.3x 10

13

Inte

nsity

MD4_September_16_Noise

2010

-09-

16 1

4:52

:48

2010

-09-

16 1

5:01

:53

2010

-09-

16 1

5:10

:59

2010

-09-

16 1

5:20

:05

2010

-09-

16 1

5:29

:10

2010

-09-

16 1

5:38

:16

2010

-09-

16 1

5:47

:22

2010

-09-

16 1

5:56

:27

2010

-09-

16 1

6:05

:33

2010

-09-

16 1

6:14

:39

2010

-09-

16 1

6:23

:44

2010

-09-

16 1

6:32

:50

2010

-09-

16 1

6:41

:56

2010

-09-

16 1

6:51

:01

2010

-09-

16 1

7:00

:07

2010

-09-

16 1

7:09

:13

2010

-09-

16 1

7:18

:18

2010

-09-

16 1

7:27

:24

2010

-09-

16 1

7:36

:30

2010

-09-

16 1

7:45

:36

372126 SUMBEFEJE1_INTTotal Charge: TRA212

Page 38: MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.

MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/2010 3838

OutlookOutlook

Detailed studies of the dependence of the trapping on Detailed studies of the dependence of the trapping on many parameters done.many parameters done.Optimisation done for: Optimisation done for:

damper settingsdamper settingssextupolessextupolesoctupoles octupoles radial positionradial position

Still some studies to be performed with the variation of Still some studies to be performed with the variation of the tune with time.the tune with time.Fluctuations are still there:Fluctuations are still there:

They seem intrinsic to the splitting processThey seem intrinsic to the splitting processThey are not affected by the damperThey are not affected by the damperThey are generated during the splitting properThey are generated during the splitting properFluctuations amplitude: not particularly affected by the Fluctuations amplitude: not particularly affected by the parameters analysed so farparameters analysed so farFluctuations frequency: seems to be affected by chromaticity Fluctuations frequency: seems to be affected by chromaticity and intensityand intensity


Recommended