+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Michael Stadermann Harry Radousky Juan Santiago GergelyZimanyi

Michael Stadermann Harry Radousky Juan Santiago GergelyZimanyi

Date post: 18-Dec-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
33
1 § Michael Stadermann § Harry Radousky § Juan Santiago § Gergely Zimanyi
Transcript

1

§ Michael Stadermann

§ Harry Radousky

§ Juan Santiago

§ Gergely Zimanyi

2

§ 1/6th of the world’s population

does not have daily access to

fresh water

§ 30+% of the U.S experienced

severe drought in 2015

§ Water will be major driver of

conflicts worldwide

§ Global market for desalination is

only $12-14 billion/year, because

specialized on sea water for

Western infrastructure

$20bn for Valentine’s day in US

$20bn quarterly shipment on iphones

3

§ technology has focused on

sea water

§ inland brackish water desalination would be

better suited for California

National Drought Mitigation Center

September 1, 2015

4

Reverse Osmosis:

§ uses non-renewable fossil energy source:

• amplifies the cause of drought

• increases dependency on increasingly scarce

fossil fuels

§ operates at high pressures, increasing costs

§ lot of mechanical moving parts

SONADES:

§ energized by renewable photovoltaic energy:

• does not amplify drought

• photovoltaics developed into a mature,

affordable technology

§ operates at low pressures, reducing costs

§ electronic technology, essentially no moving

parts

CA can become a desalination technology leader, generating manufacturing jobs and revenue

LLNL-PRES-649605

This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract DE-AC52-07NA27344.Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC

Michael Stadermann, Juan Santiago

IMAGE

Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryLLNL-PRES-649605

6

•high energy efficiency (2.5 kWh/m3

for seawater, 1.0 kWh/m3 for brackish water)

E ~ (posmotic + pmembrane)·V

•requires 40-80 bar of pressure for sea water

•requires extensive water pre- and post-treatment

•cost increases at small scale

pump

(75 atm)

high pressure

brine

Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryLLNL-PRES-649605

• removes salt from water

E ~ I2·R

• energy efficiencies of <0.5 kWh/m3 are possible

Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryLLNL-PRES-649605

• RO lower limit is given by membrane resistance

• CD energy cost scales with concentration throughout

• energy cost for CD is much lower for low salt concentrations

Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryLLNL-PRES-649605

9

Desalted

water

Porous

electrode

Salt water

Uncharged CD cellCharged CD cell

V ~

1 V

Electric double

layer (EDL)Na+

Cl-

+

-

Brine

Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryLLNL-PRES-649605

10

• hierarchical carbon aerogel (HCAM)

• 1-5 μm macropores

• 1-2 nm nanopores

• robust carbon material

• proof of principal performed with a

0.4 ml test cell

2 μm

• Modified Donnan model

• Charge balance

• Mass transport in macropores

• Micropore potential drop

• Voltage equations

• Conservation of current

Variables:

volumetric electrode charge : macropore concentration

: Donnan potential

Fitting parameters:

micropore capacitance

native charge density

c

Conclusions:• Time scales:CC, min(tconv, tdiff); CV: min(tRC,tconv)

• CV demonstrate constantandcontrollableeffluentconcentration; Fasterdesalinationratewithshorttimeofcharging

• Constant current (CC)

• Constant voltage (CV)

tdiff =le2

Defft

RC= RC t

conv=le

υRC Convection DiffusionTime scales:

0 0.5 1 1.5 265

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

Position (mm)

Con

cent

ratio

n (m

M)

1s

200s

400s

600s

800s

1000sC

once

ntra

tion

(mM

)

0 1000 2000 3000 40000

20

40

60

80

100

Time (s)

Con

cent

ratio

n (m

M)

2×10−7

m/s

5×10−7

m/s

4.2×10−6

m/s

8.4×10−6

m/s

2×10−5

m/s

Con

cent

ratio

n (m

M)

0 0.5 1 1.5 2

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1s

10s

20s

50s

100s

500s

1000s

Con

cent

ratio

n (m

M)

Position (mm)0 100 200 300 400 500

0

20

40

60

80

100

Con

cent

ratio

n (m

M)

2.1×10−6

m/s

4.2×10−6

m/s

1×10−5

m/s

5×10−5

m/s

Time (s)

mM

mM

EIS Cyclic voltammetry Leakage current

• 300 µm thick HCAM electrodes

• Flow rate: 0.24 mL/min

• Iext = 7.7 mA to 48 mA

• Vext = 1V

• Inlet concentration: 100 mM

• Under the conditions of the same amounts of charge transfer and identical

timespans, CC achieves similar salt removals but consumes much less energy

than CV.

+elec - elec

[Ca

2+]

[Na

+]

• Flow-through cell, constant current at 500 A/m2

• Strong selectivity for di-valent and tri-valent ions

• Early simulations show near-complete removal of

Ca2+ and reduced removal of Na+

• Estimate of selectivity

• Experiments under way in nitrate and lead removal

Initial Final

100mM 88mM

Initial Final

20mM 0.004mM

ratio of adsorbed ion

D[Ca2+]/[Ca2+]0/D[Na+]/[Na+]0=8.3

Selective toxin removal

Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryLLNL-PRES-649605

16

• water in electrode does not contribute

to desalination

• slow (60 mins/ cycle)

• high energy cost

• low capacity (removes ~1.5 g/L/charge)

• entire electrode volume

contributes to desalination

• faster (10-20x)

• lower energy cost (up to 3x)

• higher capacity (~4.5 g/L/charge)

Flow-between architecture

LLNL/Stanford flow-through

electrode architecture (ftCDI)

Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryLLNL-PRES-649605 17

FTE-CDIadvantages

Fullyelectric androbusttovariablepower

supply

Size-independent costandefficiency

Demonstratedionselectivity(heavymetals,

nitrate)

projectedenergyuseforbrackishwater:

0.1-0.2kWh/m3

(5-10xlessthanRO)

Reverse osmosis

Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryLLNL-PRES-649605

cell

module

system

feed water

brin

e

treated water

Stanford Undergraduate Robotics team and Aquas Technology

charging controllers

fluidic controllers

power fluctuations

2. Integrated Solar Charging:Flow-through photovoltaic cell Harry Radousky, Gergely Zimanyi

Rela%ve'output'ion'concentra%on'(%)'''''''''

40'''''''50''''''''''60'''''''''70''''''''''80'''''''''90''''''''100'

'0'''''''''''''5'''''''''''''10'''''''''''15'''''''''''20'''''''''''25''''''''''30'

Time'(min)'

ionconcentra%on(%)

%me(min)Fig. 5a-c ISC SONADES: Nano-structured PV electrode.

Idea: To fully integrate the photovoltaic energy harvesting and the desalination unit

Equivalent to the founding

concept of JCAP, the Joint

Center for Artificial Photo-

synthesis:

• Fully integrate energy

source and water splitting

unit

• The integrated system

eliminate energy

conversion losses

p-semiconductor

layer 120

n-semiconductor

layer 130

solar

cell 110

channel

array 140salty fluid

output fluid management system 160

photovoltaic desalination

system 100

output fluid

Structure, operation

input

reservoir

150

pump 152

Operation

FIG. 2C

electric double

layer EDLchannel 140i

---------

---------

---------

---++++++

++++++

++++++

+

+

+

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

+

+

+

+

n-layer 130

p-layer 120

- space charge

region in p-layer

+ space charge

region in n-layer

solar cell 110

-

+

+

-

+

-

+

-

+

-

-

+

+

-

+

-

+

-

salty fluid

reduced salinity

output fluid

---------

---------

---------

---++++++

++++++

++++++

+

+

+

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

+

+

+

+

• Incident sunlight

photogenerates +/– charges

in the p and n layers of the

PV cell

• +/- ions of saltwater, flowing

in channel through the p

and n layers get adsorbed to

the walls, salinity of output

water is reduced

• adsorbed ions are cyclically

flushed by blocking sunlight

Proof of concept: 1. Single type of charging: Nanochannel array in AAO

• drilled millions of 50-100 nm diameter channels into anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) layer

with metal assisted chemical etching, coated channel surfaces with insulating HfO2

• substantial reduction of salinity achieved

Proof of concept: 2. Nanochannel array in PV cells

• 50% reduction of salinity achieved

in few minutes under illumination

• channels need to be flushed

Rela%ve'output'ion'concentra%on'(%)'''''''''

40'''''''50''''''''''60'''''''''70''''''''''80'''''''''90''''''''100'

'0'''''''''''''5'''''''''''''10'''''''''''15'''''''''''20'''''''''''25''''''''''30'

Time'(min)'

ionconcentra%on(%)

%me(min)ISC SONADES: Nano-structured PV electrode.

• Drilled millions of 50-100 nm diameter channels

into Si PV cell with silver particle assisted

chemical etching

• Coated channel surfaces with insulating HfO2

Simulations

. Poisson’s and continuity

Hierarchical simulation infrastructure:

• Espresso platform for physics and

chemistry of adsorption at walls ~1nm

• Nernst-Planck inspire microfluidics, finite

element simulation with Openfoam

platform 50-500nm

• Effective medium theory for Stanford

simulations for meso- and macroscopic

device simulation

• Flushing cycle is lost time for operation

• High priority R&D goal: minimize duration of flushing cycle relative to charging/adsorption cycle

Discrete Solar Charging project is predictable to deliver high flow-rate

prototypes ready for scale-up in about 2 years

Integrated Solar Charging project is high risk-high reward,

eliminates energy conversion losses, promises to deliver efficient

prototypes in about 2 years

electrode

structure,

nano-channel

optimization

simulation,

effective

models

material

optimization

operations

modeling:

flushing

optimization

optimization

of photo-

voltaic energy

conversion


Recommended