+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Michel Foucault

Michel Foucault

Date post: 30-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: elmo-osborne
View: 73 times
Download: 4 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Michel Foucault. Madness and Civilisation. Periodisation of Madness. 1. Stultifera Navis or Ship of Fools (15-16 th Centuries) 2. The Great Confinement (17-18 th centuries) 3. The Birth of the Asylum (late 18 th -21 st centuries). Ship of Fools - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
21
Michel Foucault Madness and Civilisation
Transcript
Page 1: Michel Foucault

Michel Foucault

Madness and Civilisation

Page 2: Michel Foucault

Periodisation of Madness

• 1. Stultifera Navis or Ship of Fools (15-16th Centuries)

• 2. The Great Confinement (17-18th centuries)

• 3. The Birth of the Asylum (late 18th-21st centuries)

Page 3: Michel Foucault

• Ship of Fools

• The Ship of Fools is not about other people, it is about us.

Page 4: Michel Foucault
Page 5: Michel Foucault

Ship of Fools

• `Madness circulates, was part of common decor and language, a daily experience that one seeks to exalt rather than master'.

Page 6: Michel Foucault

Erasmus In Praise of Folly

• the mind of man is so framed that it is rather taken with the false colours than truth; of which if anyone has a mind to make the experiment, let him go to church and hear sermons, in which if there be anything serious delivered, the audience is either asleep, yawning, or weary of it; but if the preacher--pardon my mistake, I would have said declaimer--as too often it happens, falls into an old wives' story, they're presently awake, prick up their ears and gape after it.

Page 7: Michel Foucault

Age of Confinement / Age of Reason

• In France Hôpitale Générale

• in Germany Zuchthausen

• in Holland Rasphuis

• In England Houses of Correction

Page 8: Michel Foucault

Age of Confinement or Age of Reason

• Exclusion

• Animality

• Heterogeneity

• Labour

• Spectacle

Page 9: Michel Foucault

Age of Confinement

“The animal in man no longer has any value as the sign of a beyond; it has become madness without relation to anything but itself.”

Page 10: Michel Foucault

Age of Reason

• Bourgeois normative order

– Labour and Idleness– Human and the inhuman – Reason and unreason – Man and animal

Page 11: Michel Foucault

Bethlem or Bedlam

Page 12: Michel Foucault

Age of Confinement

• “no longer men whose minds had wandered, but beasts preyed upon by a natural frenzy”

• “In the reduction to animality, madness finds both its truth and its cure

Page 13: Michel Foucault

Age of Confinement

• “Madness was no longer talkative and manifest. It enters a silence from which it will not emerge. It is stripped of its language and if one could continue to speak of it, it would be impossible for it to speak of itself.”

Page 14: Michel Foucault

Birth of the Asylum

• Legend of Pinel and Tuke

• Liberation and Liberty

Page 15: Michel Foucault

Pinel – Releasing Lunatics

Page 16: Michel Foucault

Pinel – Releasing Lunatics

Page 17: Michel Foucault
Page 18: Michel Foucault

Pinel’s moral treatment

Page 19: Michel Foucault

Pinel’s moral treatment

• “The problem is to impose a morality that will prevail from within upon those who are strangers to it… Silence (the guilt is shifted inside)... Recognition (self-imprisonment), Perpetual Judgment (recognition of guilt)”

Page 20: Michel Foucault

The meaning of reform

• “We must re-evaluate the meanings assigned to the liberation of the insane, abolition of constraint, constitution of a human milieu – these are only justifications. In fact Tuke created an asylum where he substituted for the free terror of madness the stifling anguish of responsibility…” (Foucault)

Page 21: Michel Foucault

Age of Positivism

• The mad were turned into objects of the keeper's gaze, subjected to a system of rewards and punishments for the detail of their behaviour. The keeper was to be no longer a flogger of animals, but a moral authority and judge. The inmate was like a child handed over to the steady gaze of the man of reason. This ‘moral’ system of power, based on an objectifying observation, denied validity to the voice of the mad.


Recommended