Date post: | 09-Jan-2017 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | jelena-dukic |
View: | 104 times |
Download: | 3 times |
Migration
Brain drain or brain gain?
Economic and Social Development Essay – 15th of October 2014 Jelena Dukic & Niamh Deutz Ebeling
1
Contents Contents.................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 2 Migration .............................................................................................................................. 2 Motives for migration .......................................................................................................... 2 Content essay ....................................................................................................................... 2
Brain drain ................................................................................................................................ 3 Definition.............................................................................................................................. 3 “Brain drain” effects ............................................................................................................ 3 Downsides and upsides........................................................................................................ 3 Examples .............................................................................................................................. 4 How to prevent immigration? ............................................................................................. 4
Brain gain .................................................................................................................................. 6 Definition.............................................................................................................................. 6 Increase in migration ........................................................................................................... 6 “Reverse Brain Drain” .......................................................................................................... 6 Remittances.......................................................................................................................... 7 Education and economic growth ......................................................................................... 8 Africa .................................................................................................................................... 8
Conclusion .............................................................................................................................. 10 References .............................................................................................................................. 11
2
Introduction Migration
Since the late 1990s, when the technical boom began to expand, more and more governments opened their doors to immigrants, and specifically, highly educated immigrants. This has resulted in an even bigger movement of people across the world, than the start of globalization had already caused in the 19th century with the industrial revolution. In 2008 it was estimated that the world exists of 191 million immigrants, of which 60% lives in developed countries (20% in US and 33% in Europe). To get the facts straight, it is necessary to define what migration means and which types of migration exist. According to the UN (1998) a migrant is defined as a person who moves to a country (other than his/her usual residence) for a period of at least 12 months. There are two types of migration: immigration and emigration. Immigration defines people who migrate into a country and emigration defines people who depart from a country.
Motives for migration Looking at migration from a historical point of view, the most common motive for migration was a common language or religion in a different country. More recent examples – such as slave trade or The Irish Famine – show that migrating is not per definition a choice, but that there are different reasons for migration. In this context, some circumstances can force people to move, but voluntary migration on the contrary, has become more widespread over the past decades. The current trend of voluntary migration has multiple under laying causes: the emergence of a global labour market, the development of knowledge economies, the increase in foreign investment and trade and the tech boom of the late 1990’s has made more governments open their doors and has made it easier for human movement across the globe. As mentioned above, migration has become a very important aspect of the modern day world. Some people consider migration as something negative, but others consider it to be positive. So can migration be seen as “brain drain” or “brain gain”?
Content essay In the first chapter, the term brain drain will be discussed. This especially focuses on the negative effects of migration. In the second chapter, the term brain gain will be discussed. This especially focuses on the positive effects of migration. In the fourth chapter, all the gathered information and knowledge will be formed into a conclusion.
3
Brain drain
Definition To begin with, this worldwide phenomenon, brain drain, refers to the significant emigration of knowledgeable, well-‐educated and skilled professionals from their home country to another country, resulting in the loss of the skilled people – the so-‐called “brains” in the places they come from. As a starter example to better understand brain drain is Albert Einstein who moved from Germany to the U.S. as a result of unwillingness of German government to invest into research & development. It is widely known that he ended up influencing the nuclear era and becoming very famous. From this example, and many more, it can be see that the effect of “brain drain” causes countries to lose valuable professionals. Furthermore, this term is usually used to describe the departure of doctors, scientists, engineers or any highly educated person from that specific country.
“Brain drain” effects There are two different ways a country is being harmed when people decide to leave it. First, the supply of those specific professions that people who leave the country possess declines. Second, the country's economy is harmed as each professional represents surplus spending units. It means that as professionals often earn large salaries, their departure removes significant consumer spending from the country. There are several factors that cause this effect. The most obvious ones are the availability of better job opportunities, better salaries, working conditions and standard of living. Some other factors are wars, health issues, and political instability.
Downsides and upsides There are downsides and upsides when discussing the brain drain phenomenon. The first one to be looked at is the upsides. One of the most important sides of brain drain is the money the emigrants send back to their home country. Due to this, emigrants helped in alleviating poverty in their homes, reducing both the level and severity of poverty. The money remittances send back are spent more in investments such as education, health and housing, rather than on food and other goods. This has resulted in greater child schooling, therefore higher literacy rate, less child labour, more hours worked in self-‐employment and a higher rate of people starting capital intensive enterprises. Moreover, there is one more aspect of “brain drain” gain and that is if the professionals decide to return to their home country after some time spent abroad. That’s when the country that was once losing can now start benefiting. Unfortunately, this happens rarely, for the reason that only one side truly sees the benefit from this, which is a less developed country. This is due to the clear difference in higher job opportunities between less developed countries and more developed countries. Despite this way, a country can gain in one more way, that is, if an international network is established. This involves networking between people that went
4
abroad with people that remained in the home country. For instance, swiss-‐list.com is a networking website that was created to generate a relationship between Swiss scientists abroad and those in Switzerland. On the other hand, the country that experiences brain drain suffers a loss. Due to its influence, the investment in higher education is lost as the highly educated people leave the country and become an asset to some other country. That raises the question as to whether the skills are being put to good use in the destination country, since many college graduates are leaving their homelands, which all leads to a shortage of skilled and competent people, and vast increase in wages of high-‐skilled labour. “Brain drain” loss seems to be much more common than a “brain drain” gain and loss in that manner is much more substantial. Why? To add to what was mentioned above, less developed countries do not have the ability, both monetary and intellectual to support a developing industry, therefore different types of losses arise – economic loss in the potential capital the well-‐educated people could have brought, a loss of education, since educated people leave and there is no one to teach the next generation and improve them, and lastly, loss in research and development and advancement, since the knowledge of professionals is not going into the home country, but the other country. That is the answer to why the losses are much more persistent and common.
Examples In order to better understand the whole concept of “brain drain” there are several examples to be shown. For instance, in Russia, brain drain has been an issue for quite some time now. During the Soviet Union and after its collapse, brain drain has been increasing, due to talented people movements to the West or other countries to seek better opportunities. The Russian government introduced many programs and still does in order to return the professionals that once left Russia, and to encourage future professionals to remain in Russia and contribute to the development. Another example is India, whose education system is one of the top in the world, although the problem is, when an Indian graduates, one tends to leave India and move to other, better developed countries. However, in past few years, this trend has started to reverse itself. Namely, Indians that go abroad, for example in the United States, they tend to feel that they are missing the cultural experiences of their home country and want to go back to seek better economic opportunities.
How to prevent immigration? From examples mentioned above, it can be seen that brain drain is more common in developing countries. Every developing country tends to become developed, and in order for one country to do so, one has to have talented people that will contribute to that development. A country that has many professionals is most probably more innovative and growing in comparison of those that do not. As a result of this, in different countries, different rules and policies apply when it comes to retaining skilled workers. There are many
5
examples of which African countries dominate, and in several various measures have been introduced in order to try and limit the migration of workers to richer countries. On the other hand, there is an example of Kuwait, where people have argued that the country should develop a sense of security and hope among the nation, since the reason of leaving the country is uncertainty about a country’s future. Furthermore, China does not have any mechanisms to protect this phenomenon, but rather tries to create a free atmosphere that would help talents develop and in the long run, stay in the country. Another example is India, a country that has suffered severe brain drains over years, and their government has not adopted any strict policies since they believe that the talent that goes abroad will come back and eventually contribute to the nation.
This graph shows that the programs invented to prevent the migration (both emigration and immigration) in Russia works very well.
This map shows the parts of the world that receive remittances from migrants who work outside the country and region. It is a reflection of the "brain drain" of the impoverished world, and the compensatory flow of wealth back to the home countries.
6
Brain gain
Definition In the previous chapter, the issue of “brain drain” has been defined as significant emigration of educated or talented individuals; this can result from turmoil within a nation, from there being better professional opportunities in other countries or from people seeking a better standard of living. This chapter will now focus on “brain gain”, which can be seen as the opposite of brain drain. “Brain gain” can be defined as an increase in the number of highly trained, professionals departing a country to live and work where greater opportunities are offered, with the prospect of returning to their home country. According to the Economist (The Economist, 2011) several economists reckon that the brain drain hypothesis fails to account for the beneficial effects for the home country such as remittances, return migration, the possibility that being able to migrate to greener pastures induces people to get more education. If these aspects are taken into account, some argue that these highly skilled people could turn out to be a net benefit to the countries they leave.
Increase in migration Due to the technological boom from the 1990s onwards, connections all over the world have rapidly improved and have become indispensable to us. This has created a world that is now perceived as smaller, but yet bigger at the same time. Globalization has also played a part in this, creating a more complex world, but opening many doors along side that. Due to globalization, it has increasingly become easier to enter a different labour market. This has resulted in the fact that migration has increased rapidly and is still increasing, with people seeking to work in different countries. Migrants accounted for 47% of the increase in the workforce in the United States and 70% in Europe over the past ten years. Many people argue that (highly educated) migration “drains” the native country, leaving behind the unskilled and lower educated population. But on the contrary, many studies have shown the benefits of migration.
“Reverse Brain Drain” The International Organization for Migration is trying to encourage more emigrants to come home on a permanent or temporary basis, to give back some of what they have learnt and achieved abroad. One of the programmes they support is called “Reverse Brain Drain”. Dr. Noppawan Tanpipat (Vice President of the International Relations and Organization Communications, National Science and Technology Development Agency) says: “But what we are really seeing is the exchange of ideas, of attitudes, of different ways of doing things. We have become used to the phenomena of ideas flying across borders through cyberspace but we don't recognize the human hard drives that physically bring their entrepreneurism and experience to host countries, and back home”, stressing the positive effect migration has, but the lack of recognition for this. No higher mathematics is needed to understand that highly educated migrants moving to another country with better prospects will bring back a vast amount of knowledge on their return. This knowledge can be gained from for example
7
the high quality of education abroad, working in (international) companies abroad or setting up businesses abroad. Besides that, many observers claim that the newly acquired knowledge or technology by migrants to developing countries can increase productivity and economic development.
Remittances Another argument that supports “brain gain” is that a lot of the migrants send back remittances to their relatives in their native country after having moved abroad. In its annual report, Western Union stated that almost 84% of its annual revenue was derived from consumer-‐to-‐consumer (C2C) money transfer services (Market Line Western Union Case Study, 2012). Also, an important demand driver in this market segment is an increase in global net migration (immigration minus emigration) over the period from 1990 tot 2010, see figure 5 below. It shows that migration has come from Africa, Asia-‐Pacific and the non-‐US Americas towards the US and Western Europe. The Case Study gives the increase from lower to higher income countries in search of better wage levels and living standards as an explanation for this phenomenon.
In contrast to figure 5, figure 6 shows the net flow of funds (remittances received minus remittances sent) for the major geographical regions. The graph substantiates the idea that remittances are sent out of more developed regions such as US and Western Europe and are sent to the less developed economies. In the Western Union Case Study it explains: “According to the International Monetary Fund, for poorer recipients remittances may help pay for basic needs such as food, housing, healthcare, and education; for higher income recipients, they can help support new business ventures.” (Market Line Western Union Case Study, 2012). In 2012 the value of the remittances of the migrant population had increased to around $400 billion. In Lebanon, Lesotho, Nepal, Taikistand and a few other places,
8
remittances are more that 20% of GDP (The Economist, 2011), this is due to the fact that the skilled migrants may earn several multiples of what their income would have been at home.
Education and economic growth The economic growth and average workforce skill in the native country can also be increased by another factor. The possibility of emigration for higher wages -‐ which other inhabitants have successfully achieved -‐ could stimulate individuals to pursue education, which may also cause domestic enrolments to increase. As a result, the educated population will increase and contribute to the economic growth of a country. A study on this topic looks at Cape Verdeans, showing that: “An increase of ten percentage points in young people’s perceived probability of emigrating raises the probability of their completing secondary school by around eight points.” (The Economist, 2011). Even if they don’t all end up emigrating, this will increase the rate of educated people in their home country, benefiting their national economy. The culture and knowledge an emigrant brings to a foreign country will make local people more acquainted with products from the migrants native country, which in return will increase the export of the migrants native country. So the increased export will also stimulate the overall economic growth of the country.
Africa According to a new paper from the World Bank: “Does Migration Foster Exports?”, migration does indeed foster exports in Africa. It suggests “one additional migrant creates about $2.100 a year in additional exports for his country of origin.” (World Bank, 2014). An estimation tells us that a half-‐million more African migrants moving around the world (accounting for 1/100th of the world’s population) would create more than $1 billion in additional exports for Africa, per year. “Looking at Africa’s expected population boom in the
9
next decades, the impact Africans have from a distance on their home-‐country is only set to grow.” (The Atlantic, 2014)
10
Conclusion In assessing the usefulness of brain drain, it is important to understand that for some of the world’s developing countries "the gains from migration accrue neither from migrant remittances nor do they return home with amplified skills acquired abroad”. This shows that the highly-‐educated migrants not returning home, will cause a loss of knowledge for the home country, which in turn will also have a negative effect on the economy of the home country. Looking at the phenomenon from this point of view, brain drain only seems to benefit the host-‐country. On the other hand, it can be argued that the gains for the home country come from the increase in promotion of education of highly skilled labour in developing countries, as well as investment in infrastructure. Nonetheless there does exist a vast "remittance economy worldwide worth $400 billion in 2012". This goes to show that globalization has made labour markets in different countries more accessible, increasing migration all over the world. Highly educated people are receiving more opportunities for mobility. As a result, we can conclude, that migrants have been moving to countries with better opportunities, sending remittances back, stimulating education on return and increasing export and the economic growth of the native country.
11
References Ehrhart, H. & Goff, Le M. & Rocher, E. & Singh, R.J. (2014). Does migration foster exports? Evidence from Africa. The World Bank. Lowell, B.L. & Findlay, A. (2001). International migration papers: Migration of highly skilled developing countries: impact and policy responses. International Labour Office, Geneva, Switzerland. Organisation as the author Market Line Case Study: Western Union: Globalization benefits a money transfer market leader. Market Line Advantage (2012). Organisation as the author The Economist Economic focus. (May 26, 2011) Drain or gain? Poor countries can end up benefiting when their brightest citizens emigrate. http://www.economist.com/node/18741763 Parle, De J. (August 20, 2007). Border crossings: Rising breed of migrant: skilled and welcome. The New York Times, New York, USA. Raviv, S. (February 12, 2014). Why ‘Brain Drain’ can actually benefit African countries: A new study reveals that the farther African migrants move, the more they increase exports in their home countries. The Atlantic.