Misled and betrayed: How US cover stories arekeeping a Cold War weapon and illegal humantesting secretBy Cheryl WelshMind Justice Home PagePublished as the cover story in Torture, Asian and Global Perspectives, Volume 2, Issue 2, June-August201!A than" you to Jo #aston $or her time and advice %ith res&ect to the $inal dra$t o$ this &a&er!Terms and deinitions: 'or this &a&er, the term electromagnetic radiation (#M)* is used interchangeably%ith $re+uencies, radio-$re+uency ()'*, radio signals, radio %aves, micro%aves, micro%ave signals, lo%-$re+uency, e,tremely lo% $re+uency (#-'*, #-' $re+uencies, #M $ields, beam %ea&ons, directed energy%ea&ons!!" #ntroduction.he /0 atomic bomb e,&loded and the %orld discovered the e,istence o$ a $ormidable secret %ea&on! 1ycontrast, this &a&er %ill illustrate that there is &roo$ that neuro%ea&ons (mind control %ea&ons develo&edduring the 2old 3ar* are another $ormidable %ea&on! Ho%ever, their &o%er lies &artly in "ee&ing themsecret so they can be used surre&titiously! In &rinci&le, the science is &ossible to target and in$luence a&erson remotely and governments have been conducting secret research to develo& neuro%ea&ons! 1asedlargely on the science o$ electromagnetic radiation (#M)*, such %ea&ons could be used to sto& a &erson ormany &eo&le by in$luencing their behaviors by mani&ulating various &hysical and &sychological &arametersrelated to brain $unctions4 this could change ho% %ars are $ought! 0hrouded in secrecy, $e% &eo&le haveeven heard o$ neuro%ea&ons! 5evertheless, their im&ortance has o$ten been com&ared to the atomicbomb1 and a brie$ summary o$ the signi$icant amount o$ obscure in$ormation is &resented belo%!.he consensus is that neuro%ea&ons are still science $iction and any allegations o$ unla%$ul human sub6ecte,&eriments involving neuro%ea&ons are 6ust elaborate cons&iracy theories! .his &a&er %ill argue that theconsensus is %rong4 sho%ing that secret 2IA mind control research began as $ar bac" as the 1780s %iththe science o$ &hysical and &sychological torture being investigated in the /0 in res&onse to $ears that)ussia and 2hina had develo&ed ne%, similar techni+ues! Pro$essor Al$red Mc2oy, an e,&ert on /0 notouch torture, described the 2IA research as 9a massive mind-control e$$ort, %ith &sychological %ar$areand secret research into human consciousness that reached a cost o$ a billion dollars annually, a veritableManhattan Pro6ect o$ the mind!:2 In the mid-17;0s, some 2IA mind control &rograms, includingnonconsensual human sub6ect e,&eriments %ith -0< and other drugs, %ere e,&osed in congressionalhearings %hile other &rograms remain classi$ied!

.his &a&er %ill &resent emerging evidence su&&orting the argument that the consensus is based onmisleading /0 government cover stories %hich have been &resented as o$$icial e,&lanations %hile actuallyconcealing secret &rograms and activities!= 0teven A$tergood, a highly regarded secrecy e,&ert describedthe /0 2old 3ar secrecy system as a 9&oisonous legacy:> the e,cessive use o$ government cover stories%as routine and secrecy manuals authori?ed active dece&tion in order to &romote believable coverstories!8 .his &a&er %ill &resent converging $acts that strongly suggest t%o ma6or cover stories concealedthe e,istence o$ neuro%ea&ons and illegal human testing, $ooling nearly everyone $or si,ty years andcounting! .hese cover stories should no% be seen as obsolete %ith the evidence beginning to reveal thatneuro%ea&ons are li"ely to have already been develo&ed! As mentioned above, the $irst cover story is thatsecret neuro%ea&ons are still science $iction! .he second cover story concerns the o$$icial /0 &olicy on#M) bioe$$ects4 it being that there are no &roven e$$ects o$ #M) other than heating!@ 'or e,am&le, most&eo&le "no% ho% a micro%ave oven %or"s4 the micro%aves &roduce a thermal e$$ect and heat or coo"Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM$ood as in a micro%ave oven!!"! $euroweapons5euro%ea&ons, no touch torture, and nonlethal %ea&ons are three ma6or /0 state tools that haveemerged $rom the 2IACs 2old 3ar &rograms4 all three are ideal $or intelligence and &sychologicalo&erations and counterinsurgency %ar$are! .hey are tools designed to neutrali?e the enemy %ithout "illinganyone but by in$luencing their behavior! All three &rograms re&resent a ne% $orm o$ %ea&onry %hich canbe used on a large scale! .he $irst o$ three /0 state tools, the 2IACs no touch torture, has been describedas a 9revolutionary &sychological a&&roach: and the $irst ne% scienti$ic innovation a$ter centuries o$D&hysicalE torture!; .he second tool is the nonlethal %ea&on, %hich is a %ea&on designed to sto& theenemy %ithout "illing! 5onlethal %ea&ons include several ty&es o$ %ea&ons but this &a&er %ill only discussnonlethal %ea&ons based on #M)! In 177=, A$tergood re&orted that 9&rograms to develo& so calledFnon-lethalC %ea&ons are slo%ly emerging $rom the /!0! governmentCs secret Fblac" budget!C! ! ! .heconce&t o$ non-lethal %ea&ons is not ne%4 the term a&&ears in heavily censored 2IA documents dating$rom the 17@0s!:B 'e% &eo&le are a%are o$ the science research sho%ing that #M) has signi$icantbioe$$ects on humans other than 6ust heating4 this %ill be sho%n belo%!'or over hal$ a century, the /0 and other governments have "e&t nonlethal %ea&ons out o$ the &ublic eye!A $e% e,am&les illustrate the &oint! A 1771 London Guardian ne%s&a&er article described #M) cro%dcontrol %ea&ons that do e,ist and %ere listed in the British Defense Equipment Catalogue until 17B %henthe Ministry o$ an ongoing secret arms race overneuro%ea&ons bet%een /0 and )ussia that began in the 1780s!.he goal o$ the /0 neuro%ea&ons &rogram is to develo& the ca&ability o$ remotely targeting,communicating %ith and in$luencing a &ersonCs brain! It is a %ea&on o$ surveillance, in$luence and control!/0 government &ublications on $uture %ea&ons indicate that some neuro%ea&ons are based on thescience o$ #M) %hich allo%s $or t%o main %ea&ons ca&abilities, $irst4 in &rinci&le, #M) can be utili?ed asthe most li"ely method $or remote human surveillance, similar to radar that utili?es #M) to trac" ob6ectssuch as air&lanes or cells &hones! As sho%n belo%, in &rinci&le, this ca&ability is &ossible2= but it is not"no%n in unclassi$ied research!0econdly, #M) bioe$$ects can cause sym&toms such as nausea, disorientation or con$usion!28 In &rinci&le,this ca&ability can also be develo&ed to include &recise mind control, including $orcing someone to carryout certain s&eci$ic tas"s, ho%ever it is unre&orted in unclassi$ied science!2@ 'or all o$ the above reasons,#M) technologies $or surveillance and #M) bioe$$ects $or in$luence and control %ould seem to be ma6orareas o$ the science re+uired $or neuro%ea&ons develo&ment! Ho%ever, the consensus has com&letelydismissed the science o$ #M) and #M) bioe$$ects $or neuro%ea&ons as rudimentary in their level o$develo&ment and thus science $iction! Ho%ever, as sho%n belo%, the consensus le$t out criticalin$ormation, and there$ore its conclusion is highly +uestionable!.he de&loyment o$ the three ma6or /0 state tools %ould not necessarily eliminate the old, &oliticallyunacce&table methods o$ brutal &hysical torture and battle$ield maiming and "illing, but alternativemethods (es&ecially i$ they remain secret and there$ore covert* could be used against enemies! 5o touchtorture has already &roven to be highly success$ul as a tool o$ domination and control> several governmentmanuals sho% that since the 17@0s, the techni+ues have been disseminated 9$rom Vietnam through Iranto 2entral America!:2; -i"e%ise, nonlethal %ea&ons continue to be secretly develo&ed in several /0&rograms!2B It %ill be sho%n belo% that the neuro%ea&ons &rogram, the least "no%n and arguably themost conse+uential o$ the three 2IA 2old 3ar &rograms has also been secretly e,&anding!!"% &lleged mind control victimsAt the same time the 2IA &rograms have been ta"ing &lace, a large and gro%ing number o$ victims $romaround the %orld have alleged they have been remotely targeted, trac"ed and su$$ered illegal humane,&erimentation! 3hether this is a coincidence or a cause and e$$ect has remained an unans%ered+uestion! .he claims o$ targeting seem to include &hysical and &sychological torture %ith some $eatures o$advanced neuro%ea&ons that the military claims have not yet been develo&ed but that are included in$uture %ea&ons &lans! .he claims include $ar$etched accounts o$ $uturistic %ea&ons that sound so bi?arre,they have been dismissed as cons&iracy theory or mental illness %ithout $urther investigation! Most humanrights grou&s and ne%s&a&ers have received innumerable letters, calls or emails $rom victims %ithdes&erate &leas $or hel& cou&led %ith rambling accounts o$ cra?y sounding mind control ?a&&ing andtorture!27 0ome &eo&le may %ell be su$$ering $rom mental illness but %ithout investigating the numerousclaims, no one can be sure!.he 200@ $ature revie%ed boo" %ind &ars, Brain research and national defense, and a 200; &ashingtonPost %aga'ine article, .hought 3ars, covered the des&erate victim accounts and raised issues o$cons&iracy theory and mental illness!0 Although the &ublications included statements by scientists andmilitary e,&erts on secret government %ea&ons &rograms, the intervie% statements su&&orted that thesym&toms and technologies described by victims %ere not scienti$ically &ossible based on unclassi$iedresearch and there$ore the victims must be cons&iracy nuts or delusional! .he statements %ere acce&tedat $ace value %ith only very general +uestioning, ho%ever as A$tergood noted above, secret military%ea&ons &rograms can be cloa"ed in deceit$ul cover stories! 5either &ublication included inde&endentinvestigation or recommended $urther evaluation!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1y contrast, this &a&er e,amines e,&erts, %ea&ons and technologies and loo"s beyond the commonlyacce&ted in$ormation to reach the o&&osite o&inion, that the victim allegations may be true! stating thatalthough such %ea&ons might be &ossible, they have not been researched or develo&ed! It is agreed thatneuro%ea&ons %ith the ca&ability o$ remotely targeting, communicating %ith and controlling the enemyCsbrain is the ultimate %ea&on that ma6or nations %ould %ant to develo&! #,&erts also agree that in&rinci&le, neuro%ea&ons and the ca&ability o$ direct access to the brain and advanced &recise mindreading and in$luencing human behaviorHeven mind control--are scienti$ically &ossible!2 Ho%ever, theconsensus is that such %ea&ons are only science $iction! A number o$ reasons are given in su&&ort o$ thisconsensus! 'irstly, it is true that there is no theory $or ho% the brain %or"s and technologies to remotelyaccess the brain remain undevelo&ed! Also, ethicists have only 6ust begun to alert the &ublic to the currente,&losion o$ neuroscience &rogress and the li"elihood o$ the develo&ment o$ controversial ne%technologies! It is argued that neuroscience is still at a rudimentary level o$ develo&ment and there$orethe develo&ment o$ advanced neuro%ea&ons is not &ossible today! 0o it is argued that although advancedneuro%ea&ons are scienti$ically $easible, their develo&ment is only &ossible in the $ar $uture! 0econdly, it isargued governments %ould not be able to "ee& such %ea&ons secret $or decades!Ho%ever, this &a&er %ill argue that the consensus is %rong $or the $ollo%ing reasons! 'or decades, the /0government &revented the science re+uired $or neuro%ea&ons $rom develo&ing in the unclassi$ied realm4thereby allo%ing the /0 government to claim neuro%ea&ons are science $iction, based on the best /0science literature available! At the same time, secret neuro%ea&ons research $lourished and the /0government em&loyed e,tensive secrecy methods to disguise the $act that neuro%ea&ons %erescienti$ically &ossible not only in &rinci&le but %ere also &roven %ith science e,&eriments! 2onse+uently,secret neuro%ea&ons that are already develo&ed are a serious threat but e,&erts are not %arning the&ublic and they should be!.he &a&er is organi?ed as $ollo%s! 0ection 2 &resents a summary o$ the neuroscience re+uired $orneuro%ea&ons! 0ection&resents the $irst o$ t%o cover stories4 that neuro%ea&ons are still science$iction! .his cover story relies on the assum&tion that secret neuro%ea&ons research %ould advance at a$aster but similar develo&ment rate as unclassi$ied neuroscience, there$ore a brie$ chronology o$ thehistory o$ classi$ied and unclassi$ied neuroscience related to advanced neuro%ea&ons is &resented! .hecover story and alternative &osition are com&ared be$ore a brie$ analysis and conclusion are &resented!0ection = considers the second o$ the t%o cover stories $or neuro%ea&ons4 that there are no &roven #M)bioe$$ects e,ce&t heating! .he evidence that this cover story is obsolete is set out by &resenting thescience o$ #M) bioe$$ects related to neuro%ea&ons and /0 military research based on #M) bioe$$ects,$ollo%ed by a summari?ed history o$ their develo&ment! .he cover story and alternative &ositions areagain com&ared %ith a brie$ analysis and conclusion to $ollo%! 0ection 8 brie$ly discusses one lesser "no%nand e,treme /0 secrecy method that %as im&lemented to maintain the secrecy o$ a 2IA domesticsurveillance &rogram uncovered %ith the 2IA mind control &rograms in the 17;0s, mentioned above!0ection @ &resents conclusions and a recommendation $or $urther investigation!%" The science o neuroweapons.he &ublic needs to "no% very basic neuroscience re+uired $or neuro%ea&ons develo&ment! .his does notre+uire roc"et science or a neuroscientist to understand it but it does re+uire in$ormation that has beenmissing in the &ublic $orum! Generally s&ea"ing, the science re+uirements necessary to develo&neuro%ea&ons are as $ollo%s! It is thought that the science o$ neuro%ea&ons %ould re+uire a generaltheory $or ho% the brain %or"s and so $ar there is no unclassi$ied theory and neuroscience is toorudimentary to $orm the basis o$ a classi$ied theory! Ho%ever, this ignores the $act that to a great e,tent,Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm= o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PMneuroscientists do not theori?e in com&arison to other $ields o$ science, $or e,am&le &hysicists buildtheories to be tested!

It is %ell "no%n that neuroscience literature includes voluminous research but $e%theories to ma"e sense o$ the data, as science %riter John Horgan e,&lained> 9/n$ortunately, no one hasany idea ho% the brain integrates the out&ut o$ all its dis&arate com&onents to create %hat %e thin" o$ asa mind, or sel$! ! ! ! 5euroscientists have done a great 6ob o$ brea"ing the brain into &ieces, but they haveno idea ho% to &ut it bac" together again!:= .here$ore, the lac" o$ a brain theory could be becauseneuroscientists donCt theori?e, not because a general theory $or ho% the brain %or"s is not &ossible!'urthermore, in his 2010 boo", Creating modern neuroscience( The revolutionar) *+,-s, Gordon0he&herd, a &rominent neuroscientist, %rote that the 1780s can be considered the greatest decade inbiology and neuroscience because there %ere so many discoveries, brea"throughs and milestones! 'ore,am&le, in biology, the structure o$ 91y ma&&ing circuit activity, Luste thin"s researchers can Idiscover &atterns that are the&hysical re&resentation and origin o$ mental states--o$ thoughts, $or e,am&le, or memories!IB= Lustee,&lained that researchers %ant to chart a $unctional model o$ the brain by ma&&ing each o$ the billions o$neurons in the human brain and observing their actions! 5euroscientists ac"no%ledge that JbamaCs brain&ro6ect %ill ta"e decades to com&lete!It is also signi$icant that JbamaCs 1rain Ma&&ing Pro6ect, %hich is no% a &art o$ the 1)AI5 InitiativeB8 has$ocused on develo&ing invasive electronic technologies such as nano&robes and %ireless microcircuits that%ill $loat $reely in the brain! .he &ro&osed technologies to access the brain involve &hysical contact,invasive &rocedures or bul"y machines and cannot be done remotely! AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm7 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PMo$ the biology revolution!B; .he biology revolution in science and the cognitive revolution in &sychologytoo" o$$ in the 17@0s and since then, molecular biology, cognitive &sychology and biochemistry haveremained the dominant areas o$ research in neuroscience!BB As e,&lained above, the great interest inbio&hysics in the 1780s did not last through the 17@0s!B7Although the study o$ bioelectricity is e+ually as im&ortant as the study o$ biochemisty o$ theelectromagnetic brain, in unclassi$ied neuroscience research, bioelectricity %as absorbed by biochemistry,and molecular biology! .oday, the ma6or areas o$ research that have dominated neuroscience are cellularand molecular biology, cognitive &sychology and systems neuroscience, %hich develo&ed into brainimaging!70 'or e,am&le, in 2012, there %ere =0,000 members o$ American 0ociety $or 5euroscience %ith9massive re&resentation o$ molecular biology, cognitive &sychology and brain imaging!:71 9DMEolecularbiology is no% e,&ected to ta"e the dominant role in the t%enty-$irst century that &hysics &layed in thet%entieth!:72Additionally, since the 1780s, the behaviorist revolution has had the signi$icant im&act o$ &reventing studyo$ the relationshi& o$ brain biology to behavior, until the last $e% decades! 'rom the early t%entiethcentury through the 17@0s, the behaviorism movement dominated &sychology! 1ehaviorism includede,&eriments utili?ing $or e,am&le, stimulus-res&onse and observable behavior studies! 0igni$icantly,behaviorism e,cluded any study o$ biological $actors and brain &rocesses! In the 1780s, &rominentscientists %ere also actively su&&orting the behaviorist a&&roach in 2IA mind control research! 'ore,am&le, Jolly 3est, a 2IA scientist and the director o$ the /niversity o$ 2ali$ornia at -os Angeles5euro&sychiatric Institute, %as instrumental in &romoting behaviorism! .here %ere several 2IA scientistsincluding Harold 3ol$$ and #%en 2ameron, and others %ho %ittingly and un%ittingly %ere receiving 2IA$unds $or the research!7 .his had the overall e$$ect o$ limiting research on the brain biology relationshi&!In the 17@0s, the inability o$ behaviorism to e,&lain cognitive $actors such as intelligence and &ersonalityled to its do%n$all! A$ter the 17@0s, its restricting e$$ect on biological causes o$ behavior remained inevidence, $or decades! Jne &sychologist e,&lained> 9Advocates o$ biological a&&roaches to &sychological&roblems $ound little $inancial su&&ort, little academic encouragement, and $e% outlets in &sychological&ublications!:7= .he cognitive revolution re&laced behaviorism4 and by 6oining the biology revolution,cognitivists began to study mental &rocesses in the brain, although &rimarily %ith indirect tools such asbrain scanning technologies! .%o ma6or areas o$ cognitive &sychology develo&ed4 molecular biology andsystems biology, %hich is the study o$ 9ma&&ing elements o$ cognitive $unction onto s&eci$ic brainareas!:78 .he brain scanning technologies such as the P#. scans and 'M)I enabled research on systemsbiology to $lourish! Although it is slo%ly starting to change, cognitive scientists have studied the mental&rocesses but have ignored brain biology, instead ta"ing a $unctionalist a&&roach based on the belie$ thatthe $unctioning o$ a &erson can be studied inde&endently o$ other $actors!7@ .he $unctionalist a&&roach inneuroscience remained a signi$icant in$luence, $or e,am&le in connectionist research47; neuroscientists%ho $ocused their research on the biology o$ the brain have not embraced the connectionist a&&roach,7B$or reasons such as the connectionist modeling did not usually match ho% the brain $unctions in reality!77.hus, both the cognitive revolution and also the connectionist a&&roach have been slo% to reduce theenormous ga& bet%een the study o$ brain biology and human behavior that began %ith behaviorism!.he study o$ consciousness, %hich is another area o$ study o$ the brain behavior relationshi&, has beensub6ect to centuries old religious and &hiloso&hical debates! .he scienti$ic a&&roach to the study o$consciousness %as considered heresy100 and the study o$ consciousness %as o$$ limits in &sychology andalso neuroscience throughout most o$ the 20th century!101 In the late 17B0s, 'rancis 2ric", a &hysicalchemist and 5obel laureate $or discovery o$ the structure o$ thee,&ectation is that classi$ied research into bioelectricity %ould be $ar more develo&ed, as $urther sho%n inthe ne,t section!(" The second o two cover stories) *M+ bioeects policy0ince the 1780s, the /0 government has endorsed an #M) bioe$$ects &olicy %hich states that there are no&roven #M) bioe$$ects, only heating e$$ects! .his section &resents the $ollo%ing! .he science o$ #M)bioe$$ects is brie$ly summari?ed, then a summary o$ the science o$ #M) bioe$$ects $or neuro%ea&ons isdescribed! 5e,t, a brie$ chronology o$ some o$ the history o$ #M) bioe$$ects &olicy, including a brie$ historyo$ bioelectromagnetics, the science o$ #M) bioe$$ects is &resented! Additionally, it %ill be sho%n that thereare strong indications that the /0 #M) bioe$$ects &olicy is conse+uential to the 2old 3ar history o$ anongoing secret arms race bet%een the /0 and )ussia over neuro%ea&ons! A short analysis andconclusions are given!("! Science o *M+ bioeectsIn the nineteenth century, James 2ler" Ma,%ell discovered that all &hysical &henomena, $rom energies tochemical and solid bodies are built on oscillations! 3ith oscillation comes #M)! Ma,%ell discovered all%aves are mathematically identical %ith relationshi&s along a continuum "no%n as the electromagnetics&ectrum, $or e,am&le micro%aves, light and also the "ilohert? oscillations by the neurons in the brain!107#M) bioe$$ects are based on the $act that electricity, magnetism and electromagnetism are interconnected&henomena, including in the human body and the brain! #M) bioe$$ects are based on the %ell-established$act that electrical currents, (including those in the brain* &roduce electromagnetic $ields! .he brain canalso be in$luenced by e,ternal electricity and electromagnetic and magnetic $ields!110 An e,am&le o$magnetic signals that can in$luence behavior is transcranial magnetic stimulation (.M0*, a medical thera&yMisled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm11 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PMthat directs tiny magnetic signals at certain areas o$ the brain to relieve de&ression!Alan 'rey, a &hysicist, neuroscientist, and one o$ the $ounders o$ the 1ioelectromagnetics 0ociety, %rotethat #M) is ubi+uitous in biology and signi$icantly, internal #M) signals are modulated %ith in$ormationli"e a radio $or brain communication> 9D-Eiving beings are electrochemical systems that use very lo%$re+uency electromagnetic $ields in everything $rom &rotein $olding through cellular communication tonervous system $unction! .o model ho% #M $ields a$$ect living beings, one might com&are them to theradio %e use to listen to music! ! ! ! .his is the model that much biological data and theory tell us touse!:111.he basic scienti$ic conce&t behind #M) bioe$$ects is as $ollo%s> 95umerous inde&endent e,&erimentsre&orted in the &eer-revie%ed 6ournal research literature conclusively establish that nonthermal bioe$$ectso$ lo%-intensity #M $ields do indeed e,ist! ! ! ! #,tremely %ea" #M $ields may, at the &ro&er $re+uency andsite o$ a&&lication, &roduce large e$$ects that are either clinically bene$icial or harm$ul! 0ome s&eci$ic$re+uencies have highly s&eci$ic e$$ects on tissues in the body, 6ust as drugs have their s&eci$ic e$$ects ontarget tissues!:112 0igni$icantly, a 1771 nternational !evie" of the !ed Cross /C!C0 re&ort on directedenergy %ea&ons described the same $inding> :)esearch %or" has also revealed that &athological e$$ectsclose to those induced by highly to,ic substances could be &roduced by electromagnetic radiation even atvery lo% &o%er, es&ecially those using a &ulse sha&e containing a large number o$ di$$erent$re+uencies!:11A 2010 revie% o$ #M) bioe$$ects literature concluded that although #M) bioe$$ects science remainsunsettled, there is no doubt that biosystems can be a$$ected by #M's at several levels> 9.here is also littledoubt that biosystems can be the source o$ #M's! .he main +uestion at hand is %hether biosystems use#M' $or a &ur&ose$ul interaction (communication* and i$ so at %hat level o$ the bio-organism %ill itha&&enK .he amount o$ data that su&&ort the latter notion is ra&idly mounting!:11= Most %ould agree thatbioelectromagnetics is $undamental to human biology and yet other &revailing scienti$ic vie%&oints about#M) su&&ort the argument this research is still rudimentary> 9#ven though the body is basically anelectrochemical system, modern science has almost e,clusively been concerned %ith the chemicalas&ect!:118("% *M+ bioeects or neuroweapons2onventional neuroscience maintains that electricity is the &rimary communication system in the brain,based on the neuron doctrine! As noted above, the current state o$ #M) bioe$$ects research is thedetermination o$ %hether the brain communicates in$ormation among the brain cells %ith electromagnetic%aves that are given o$$ and received by the brain cells! .his is unsettled science, as much remains to bediscovered and understood! .his is the area o$ science that is also &olitici?ed, controversial, and classi$ied!5evertheless, in the 17B0s, research had begun to establish both internal and also e,ternal sources o$electromagnetic radiation (#M)* can communicate %ith the brain and alter behavior!11@#M) bioe$$ects seems to be im&ortant $or both $uture neuro%ea&ons and $or solving the brainMs so-calledneural code!11; -e%is 0lesin, editor o$ the trade &ublication %icro"ave $e"s e,&lained that the science $or#M) and its e$$ect on human behavior has been established and the 2IACs mind control &rograms havee,&lored %hether #M) can target &eo&le at a distance!11B .he results o$ the 2IA research are not "no%n4the research remains classi$ied!117 As %ill be sho%n, the science o$ #M) seems to be e,tremely im&ortantto /0 national security because it &rovides the most viable method "no%n $or remote access to the brain!.here$ore, a $e% e,am&les o$ the science o$ #M) bioe$$ects research on the brain as it relates toneuro%ea&ons is &resented ne,t! .he research has held great %ea&ons &otential $or decades and %hatlittle in$ormation that is available in unclassi$ied research remains e,tremely rudimentary and s&eculative!)obert 1ec"er, one o$ the $ounders o$ the science o$ bioelectromagnetics in the 17@0s120 and t%icenominated $or a 5obel Pri?e $or his bioelectromagnetics research,121 described a ma6or scienti$ic &rinci&leo$ bioelectromagnetics>.he micro%aves alone (unmodulated* have no e$$ect! .he t%o ty&es o$ modulation that arebiologically im&ortant are &ulsed and am&litude! Modulation is the secret o$ transmittingin$ormation by means o$ electromagnetic $ields! It a&&ears that Dli"e AM radioE the body alsoMisled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm12 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PMdemodulates the signal %hen e,&osed to modulated radio-$re+uency or micro%ave $ields4the biological e$$ect is that o$ the lo%-$re+uency modulation! In this vie%, all biologicaleffects are produced b) EL# frequencies! .his ma"es sense, because the body systems that&ic" u& electromagnetic $ield are ItunedI to natural $re+uencies bet%een 0 and 0 H?!122In the 17B0s, 1ec"er described a military re&ort that stated micro%ave &ulses a&&eared to &roducestimulation in the central nervous system!12 1ec"er stated the stimulation %as com&arable to Jose IIn this investigation it %ill be sho%n that thes&o"en %ord o$ the hy&notist may also be conveyed by modulated electromagnetic energydirectly into the subconscious &arts o$ the human brain-i!e!, %ithout em&loying any technicaldevices $or receiving or transcoding the messages and %ithout the &erson e,&osed to suchin$luence having a chance to control the in$ormation in&ut consciously! As a &reliminary testo$ the general conce&t, 0cha&it? &ro&osed recording the brain %aves induced by s&eci$icdrugs, then modulating them onto a micro%ave beam and $eeding them bac" into anundrugged &ersonMs brain to see i$ the same state o$ consciousness could be &roduced bythe beam alone! ! ! !.he second e,&eriment %as to be the im&lanting o$ hy&notic suggestions $or sim&le acts,li"e leaving the lab to buy some &articular item, %hich %ere to be triggered by a suggestedtime, s&o"en %ord, or sight! 0ub6ects %ere to be intervie%ed later! IIt may be e,&ected,I0cha&it? %rote, Ithat they rationali?e their behavior and consider it to be underta"en out o$their o%n $ree %ill!I1280igni$icantly, as cited above, the I2)2 and the re&ort $or the 5IH also described #M) bioe$$ects that actli"e drugs! Additionally, in a 2002 /0 9.his investigation may s&a%n a ne% industry in %hich the human is enhanced by e,ternally a&&liedelectromagnetic &ulses so sha&ed as to enhance s&eci$ic biochemical changes %ithin the body %ithoutdrugs!: 12@Michio Oa"u, a &hysicist, e,&lained ho% #M) could be utili?ed to develo& the ca&abilities that are$undamental to neuro%ea&ons> 9In &rinci&le the brain is a transmitter over %hich our thoughts arebroadcast in the $orm o$ tiny electrical signals and electromagnetic %aves! !!! )adio %aves can be beameddirectly into the human brain to e,cite areas o$ the brain "no%n to control certain $unctions!:12; Oa"ue,&lained that in the 1780s, 3ilder Pen$ield, a neurosurgeon $ound that i$ he used electrodes to stimulatethe brain, his &atients %ould re&ort e$$ects as hearing voices or seeing things that originated in theirmind!12B .oday, Pen$ieldCs research remains rudimentary in its develo&ment, nevertheless Oa"u made the$ollo%ing conclusion> 9In the $uture it may be &ossible to beam electromagnetic signals at &recise &arts o$the brain that are "no%n to control s&eci$ic $unctions!I127In 2010, the &rominent &hysicist 'reeman 9.he essential $acts that %ill ma"e detailedobservation or control o$ a brain &ossible: are micro%ave signals and t%o tools4 $irst microsco&ic radiotransmitters and receivers4 and second, a tool to convert neural signals into radio signals and viceversa!10 5umerous $urther s&eculative e,am&les o$ the rudimentary level o$ the unclassi$ied science areavailable!("' Chronology o *M+ bioeects policyMany argue that the study o$ #M) bioe$$ects, called bioelectromagnetism, has been discredited during theMisled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM$irst hal$ o$ the t%entieth century and has no scienti$ic validity!11 Physicians discovered that ionising #M)$re+uencies such as in ,-rays could &roduce cancer and that non-ionising #M) $re+uencies belo% light didnot seem to cause cancer! .here$ore the general conclusion %as that non-ionising #M) had no biologicale$$ects> 92lassical conce&ts o$ &hysics sim&ly did not allo% $or any meaning$ul interaction bet%een any$orm o$ non-ionising electromagnetic radiation and living organisms!:12 In addition, since 3orld 3ar II,the AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm18 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM)oosevelt about the %ea&ons &otential o$ nuclear &hysics!1;1 As noted above, 1ec"er cited a militaryre&ort describing micro%ave &ulses %ith the ca&ability o$ &recise mind control %ithout the need $orim&lants1;2 and in the mid-17B0s, 1ec"er recounted several researchers surmised such a %ea&on %as a&ossibility!1; Most %ould agree that i$ develo&ed, such a %ea&on could be com&arable to an atomic bomb!1ec"er had %itnessed decades o$ bioelectromagnetics research, the gro%ing /0 and )ussian interest in#M) %ea&ons and e,cessive government secrecy including government dece&tion and disin$ormationtechni+ues! In conversation %ith another &ioneer o$ bioelectromagnetics research (Pro$essor A! )! -ibo$$*,1ec"er al%ays maintained the belie$ that both the /0 and )ussian governments %ere very much involvedin #M) mind control research!1;= 1oth 1ec"er and Adey $elt that electromagnetic mind control %asinevitable!1;8 Jn a 17B= 112 documentary on Pro6ect Pandora, 1ec"er surmised that there could be asu&er-secret Manhattan Pro6ect to develo& #M) %ea&ons and that the best cover story, the o$$iciale,&lanation $or secret government research, %ould be that #M) %ea&ons %ere not scienti$ically &ossible!1;@ It seems that 1ec"erCs s&eculation %as correct> the #M) bioe$$ects &olicy is a /0 government o$$icialscience &olicy that denies #M) bioe$$ects and as sho%n belo%, the most &rominent o$ e,&erts have citedthe #M) bioe$$ects &olicy to claim that #M) neuro%ea&ons are not &ossible!("0 !,,.s and beyond) *M+ neuroweapons and e2cessive secrecy'or decades, the military has o$$icially endorsed the #M) bioe$$ects &olicy! .he /0 seems to have gone togreat lengths to "ee& #M) bioe$$ects science and its %ea&ons &otential out o$ the &ublic eye! Ho%ever,%ith the brea"u& o$ the 0oviet /nion, some in the /0 military thre% out this $i$ty year old o$$icial &olicy! In177;, the /0 military began &roviding ne% $unding $or the develo&ment o$ nonlethal %ea&ons based onthe biological e$$ects o$ #M)!1;; 5evertheless, %ell established academic scienti$ic organi?ations ando$$icials, including the /0 Air 'orce, cited belo%, continued to endorse the #M) bioe$$ects &olicy!)ichard Gar%in is a &hysicist and one o$ the $ounders o$ the /0 5ational )econnaissance J$$ice (5)J*, theagency that conducts secret satellite surveillance $or national security &ur&oses! In his 1777 2ouncil on'oreign )elations, (2')* re&ort, $on2Lethal Technologies( Progress and Prospects, Gar%in re&orted there%ere already established ma6or classi$ied &rograms that included &sychological %ar$are, in$ormation%ar$are and nonlethal %ea&ons!1;B In a 200= 2ouncil on 'oreign )elations re&ort, Gar%in recommendedthat s"illed engineers and scientists %or" on directed energy, electromagnetic cou&ling, modeling and&hysiology! He described the ongoing inter-service con$licts, the &roblem o$ redundancy, a burdensomesecrecy system and the lac" o$ accountability $or %ea&ons!1;7In a 2008 9$or the record: email to this author, Gar%in stated that has evaluated electromagnetic %ea&ons$or the /0 AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1@ o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PMbioe$$ects research! As e,&lained above, #M) bioe$$ects seem to have a role in brain $unctions, ho%everthe unclassi$ied research remains rudimentary in its develo&ment!In 200;, the o$$icial /0A' science &olicy stated that its #M) bioe$$ects &olicy is that there are nonon-thermal e$$ects o$ micro%aves!1B= At the same time, consistent $unding, the develo&ment o$ advanced technologies and ade+uate numbers o$academic e,&erts and consistent standards $or #M) bioe$$ects academic literature! Most scientists have no%ay o$ challenging the /0 government &olicy o$ #M) bio$$ects! 5evertheless, #M) bioe$$ects research hasa $irm scienti$ic $oundation in the study o$ bioelectromagnetics! )ather than a $ringe area o$ science, #M)bioe$$ects research remains e,tremely rudimentary and has been highly classi$ied and &olitici?ed!A reasonable s&eculation is that the utilitarian 2IA mind control researchers %ould have recogni?ed the&otential o$ #M) as a li"ely method $or remote surveillance o$ the brain and also #M) bioe$$ects research$or in$luencing and controlling human behavior $or use in neuro%ea&ons develo&ment! It could be arguedthat the o$$icial #M) bioe$$ects &olicy %as utili?ed to &ublically encourage the belie$ that #M) only had athermal e$$ect! At the same time, the /0 government continued secret research loo"ing at other im&actssuch as the &ossibility o$ altering and in$luencing behaviorHeven mind control-- and also the &ossibility o$#M) $or remote surveillance and targeting o$ the brain!.he /0 governmentCs reasons $or im&lementing the #M) bioe$$ects may not be clearly established,ho%ever signi$icant evidence suggests that the #M) bioe$$ects &olicy %as instrumental in bloc"ing nearlyall #M) bioe$$ects neuroscience research $or over si,ty years! .he science o$ #M) bioe$$ects on the braincontinues to be marginali?ed, controversial, and mislabeled as $ringe, even 6un" science!-" &n e2treme US secrecy method.he consensus is that governments canCt "ee& secrets $or decades! Ho%ever, as one e,&ert, 3illiam Ar"ine,&lained, secrecy e,&erts are in agreement that in the realm o$ national security secrets, vital or genuinenational security secrets remain secret!1B; )ecently, headline ne%s re&orted the 50ACs Prism &rogram $orclandestine mass surveillance data mining that %as lea"ed by #d%ard 0no%den,1BB but $e% &eo&le haveheard o$ the more e,treme secrecy method o$ constant surveillance o$ government em&loyees in highlysensitive &ositions and also the constant surveillance o$ their $amilies! 'or e,am&le, Pro$essor HughGoodall described that his $ather %or"ed $or the 2IA conducting domestic surveillance %hich too" &lacemuch longer than the 17;0s congressional committees uncovered! GoodallCs $ather %as scheduled totesti$y be$ore the hearings but he died, his house %as bro"en into and a moving van hauled a%ayeverything including his diary!1B7 .his ha&&ened to others including 1ill Harvey %ho %or"ed $or the 2IAand %as involved in the attem&ted assassinations o$ 'idel 2astro!170Goodall described gro%ing u& in a classi$ied $amily4 his mother told him that they %ere al%ays being%atched every%here they %ent and in their home!171 .heir home %as $itted %ith listening devices andeven their se, lives %ere not secret! In the 17@0s and 17;0s, some classi$ied $amilies lived on military&osts and vehicles %ith listening devices %ould constantly record their daily conversation!172 Goodallstated>3e %ere told %e %ere being %atched $or our o%n good as %ell as $or the good o$ ourMisled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1; o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PMcountry! 3e %ere told that it %as im&ortant to be %atched because my $ather %or"ed in asensitive &osition, and &eo&le in these &ositions had to be care$ully observed, as %ell astheir $amilies and $riends and associates, because you 6ust never "ne% %ho might be s&illing%hat to %hom!17It seems unli"ely that a vital national security secret such as the e,istence o$ secretly develo&edneuro%ea&ons %ould be lea"ed given such e,treme secrecy methods! 2ontrary to the consensus, it is&lausible that neuro%ea&ons %hich began in the 1780s 2IA mind control &rograms could be "e&t secret!/" Conclusions and recommendation.he ne% evidence in this &a&er suggests that t%o 2old 3ar cover stories are no% obsolete! It can beargued that the consensus, including nearly all o$ the &rominent e,&erts, overloo"ed signi$icantin$ormation that has resulted in devastating conse+uences! 0igni$icant evidence su&&orts that theunsettled areas o$ neuroscience--bioelectricity and bioelectromagneticsHare almost surely critical areas o$science $or neuro%ea&ons develo&ment! /0 secrecy methods surrounding this research have includedactive dece&tion, s&reading disin$ormation, distorting and su&&ressing science research, covering u&&romising research and %ithholding $unding $rom scientists %ith an interest in the area o$ research! 1y"ee&ing the science $rom develo&ing in the unclassi$ied realm, the /0 government can cite mainstreamscience literature and claim neuro%ea&ons are not &ossible, thus com&letely nulli$ying any o&&osingo&inions! In this %ay, the /0 government breached its trust %ith the &ublic by classi$ying andmono&oli?ing %hole areas o$ science as %ell as neuro%ea&ons!.he t%o cover stories %ere based on the &arado, bet%een classi$ied and unclassi$ied neuroscienceresearch that began in the 1780s! 'irst, the revolutionary 1780s neuroscience research %as the basis $or atheory o$ ho% the brain %or"s! 'urthermore, the un&aralleled decade o$ the revolutionary 1780sHand itcan be argued, the 1780s 2IA mind control &rograms--determined ho% modern neuroscience develo&edinto the t%enty-$irst century, a &attern o$ develo&ment %ith no $oreseeable end in sight! 0econd, by bothchance and design, unclassi$ied neuroscience develo&ed in an e,tremely s"e%ed &attern %ith a $ocus onbiochemistry, molecular biology, cognitive neuroscience and brain imaging and a signi$icant lac" o$bioelectricity research! .hird, although the /0 government actively discouraged mainstream neuroscience$rom investigating bioelectricity, research on the electrical &ro&erties o$ the brain is not only scienti$ically&ossible in &rinci&le but also e,&erimentally &ossible, although it remains rudimentary! Additionally, the /0government im&lemented its o$$icial #M) bioe$$ects &olicy, thereby actively restricting the research!5evertheless, a hand$ul o$ researchers established the basic bioe$$ects science in &rinci&le ande,&erimentally, although it remains rudimentary! 1oth the bioelectricity and also #M) bioe$$ects researchsuggest that neuro%ea&ons develo&ment is scienti$ically &ossible!-ast, the study o$ the electrochemical brain has been divided into t%o entirely se&arate researcha&&roaches4 $irst, unclassi$ied research %ith its incom&lete biochemical brain a&&roach that can neversolve ho% the brain %or"s4 and secondly, the classi$ied research, com&lete %ith all $our o$ there+uirements $or the develo&ment o$ neuro%ea&ons! .hus, it is &ossibleHgiven the secrecy surroundingvital national security secrets--neuro%ea&ons research has $lourished in com&lete secrecy since the1780s! It sounds absolutely im&ossible! Ho% could so many have been misguided by neuroscience and thebio&hysics o$ neuro%ea&ons $or so longK As the saying goes, II$ the only tool you have is a hammer, you%ill see every &roblem as a nail!I -i"e%ise, $or decades, &rominent e,&erts have overloo"ed obscure butcritical in$ormation and thus have remained absolutely convinced that the science o$ neuro%ea&ons isscience $iction! .his un%avering consensus remains $irmly in &lace, ho%ever, today it can be sho%n thatneuro%ea&ons are not science $iction! .his is %hy $urther research and investigation is called $or4 thealleged mind control victims deserve a $air and im&artial hearing, as it is highly &ossible that secret /0neuro%ea&ons are more li"ely than not already success$ully develo&ed!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1B o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1 Hugh Gusterson, .he militari?ation o$ neuroscience, Bulletin of the Atomic .cientists /3nline0, A&ril 10,200;! Available at! htt&>AA%%%!thebulletin!orgAmilitari?ation-neuroscience!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm17 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM2 Al$red Mc2oy, 4uestion of torture, CA nterrogation, from the Cold &ar to the &ar on Terror (200@*,Introduction, Jutline, 2!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm20 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM Mar" Ma??etti and .im 3einer, 'iles on illegal s&ying sho% 2IA s"eletons $rom 2old 3ar, $e" 5or6 Times,June 2;, 200;! Available at htt&>AA%%%!nytimes!comA200;A0@A2;A%ashingtonA2;cia!htmlK&age%antedQallRSrQ0!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm21 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM= 0teven A$tergood, .he 0o$t-"ill $allacy, the idea o$ Fnon-lethal %ea&onsC is &olitically attractive and&ur&osely misleading, Bulletin of Atomic .cientist, 0e&temberAJctober 177=, =8!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm22 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM8 Ibid!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm2 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM@ 0haron 3einberger, 9.hought %ars,: &ashington Post %aga'ine, January 1=, 200;, &!322! Available athtt&>AA%%%!%ashington&ost!comA%&-dynAcontentAarticleA200;A01A10AA)200;01100177!html!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm2= o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM; Mc2oy, 1=, n! 2 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm28 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PMB A$tergood, n! = above! 0ee also AA%%%!usne%s!comAusne%sAcultureAarticlesA7;0;0;AarchiveS00;@0!htm!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm2@ o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM7 Peter Oennard, 'ield o$ nightmares, &ee6end Guardian, 'ebruary 2-, 1771!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm2; o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM10 -ouise AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm2B o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM11 Micro%ave %ea&ons study by 0oviets cited, #ederal Times, AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm27 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM12 Ibid!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm0 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1 0teven 3right, 3ea&ons o$ control, $e" .cientist, 88! 0ee also n! 11 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1= AA%%%!raven1!netAv2success2!gi$! Also available at htt&>AA%%%!raven1!netAv2success!gi$!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm2 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM18 /!0! military heat ray %ea&on unveiled, 1uffington Post Canada, March 1, 2012! Available at>htt&>AA%%%!hu$$ington&ost!caA2012A0A1Aus-military-heat-ray-%ea&onSnS1=072!html!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1@ 2hristo&her -ea"e, 3ill 0te%art, Putin targets $oes %ith ?ombie gun, %ail on .unda), A&ril 1, 2012!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm= o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1; Press con$erence on GorbachevCs nuclear arms elimination &ro&osals, BBC .ummar) of &orld Broadcasts,January 21, 17B@> .ass $or abroad> 0/AB1@2AA1A1! Available at -e,is 5e,is!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm8 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1B 5icholas 0tenec", %icro"ave debate /*+890, B=!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm@ o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM17 The 7nited $ations and Disarmament( *+9,2*+8, (17B8 *5e% Lor", /5 Publication 0ales 5o! #!B8!IT!@,11=, 118, 11@!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm; o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM20 V! -! Issraelyan, )e&resentative o$ the /00) to the 2ommittee on AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm7 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM22 3illiam 1a"er, et al!, 2ontrolled e$$ects> 0cientists e,&lore the $uture o$ controlled e$$ects, A')-Cs AA%%%!%ired!comAthreatlevelA200;A02AmindScontrolSmaA! 0ee also 3einberger, n! @ above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm=; o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM0 Moreno, n! 2 above, ne% edition o$ 200@ boo"! 0ee also 3einberger, n! @ above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm=B o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1 .he 1oard o$ 'reedom $rom 2overt Harassment and 0urveillance, .o the President o$ the /nited 0tates o$America &ashington Post E;press, July 1@, 201! Available at %%%!$reedom$chs!comA%ash&oste,&rad!&d$!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm=7 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM2 Oa"u, n! 2= above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm80 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM James -ivingston Driving force( The magic po"er of magnets (177;*, 2=7!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm81 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM= John Horgan 1rain teaser> 3e thin", there$ore %e are! 1ut %e donCt "no% ho% %e thin", &ashington Post,Jctober 1;, 1777!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm82 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM8 Gordon 0he&herd, Creating modern neuroscience( The revolutionar) *+,-s (2010*, 11, 12!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm8 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM@ #ric Oandel, -arry 0+uire, 5euroscience> 1rea"ing do%n scienti$ic barriers to the study o$ brain and mind,.cience, 5ovember 10, 2000!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm8= o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM; 0he&herd, 12, n! 8 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm88 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PMB 0he&herd, 22, n! 8 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm8@ o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM7 -arry 0+uire et al!, #undamental neuroscience, #ourth edition (201*, !Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm8; o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM=0 Ibid! at 1071!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm8B o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM=1 John Horgan, .he myth o$ mind control> 3ill anyone ever decode the human brainK Discover %aga'ine,Jctober 27, 200=! Available at htt&>AAdiscovermaga?ine!comA200=AoctAcover!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm87 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM=2 Ibid!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm@0 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM= Ibid!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm@1 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM== Ibid!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm@2 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM=8 G%en I$ill, 3ill /0 $orge &ublic-&rivate &artnershi& to dra% brain activity ma&K PB. $e"s1our, 'ebruary20, 201! Available at> htt&>AA%%%!&bs!orgAne%shourAbbAhealthA6an-6une1AmedicalS02-20!html!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm@ o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM=@ Horgan, n! =1 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm@= o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM=; Victor 2hase, .hattered nerves( 1o" science is solving modern medicine=s most perple;ing problem(200@*, 1, 2!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm@8 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM=B Ibid!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm@@ o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM=7 Jose .o%ard a &sychocivili?ed society, Volume =1, &orldPerspectives /17@7*Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm@; o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM80 2hase, 1, n! =; above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm@B o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM81 1ec"er, ;0, B2, n! 2@ above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm@7 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM82 Andre% Marino, Going some"here( Truth about a life in science, (2010*! ;! Available at htt&>AA%%%!goingsome%hereboo"!comA! 0ee also Abraham 'le,ner, .he 'le,ner )e&ort, 1ulletin 5umber 'our,2arnegie 'oundation $or the Advancement o$ .eaching, (2010*! Available athtt&>AA%%%!carnegie$oundation!orgA&ublicationsAmedical-education-united-states-and-canada-bulletin-number-$our-$le,ner-re&ort-0!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm;0 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM8 1ec"er, B2, n! 2@ above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm;1 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM8= Ibid! at 72, n! 2@ above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm;2 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM88 Albert 0?ent-Gyorgyi, 0tudy o$ energy-levels in biochemistry, $ature, ;=8>18;, August 7, 17=1! 0eealso, Albert 0?ent-Gyorgyi, ntroduction to submolecular biolog) (17@0*!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm; o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM8@ )al&h Moss, #ree radical, Albert .'ent2G)org)i and the battle over vitamin C (17BB*, 2==!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm;= o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM8; Albert 0?ent-Gyorgyi, The living state and cancer (17;B *, =!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm;8 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM8B 0he&herd, =, n! 8 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm;@ o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM87 'rancis 0chmitt, FPsycho&hysics considered at the molecular and submolecular levels,C in Michael Oasha,1ernard Pullman, eds!, 1ori'ons in biochemistr)> Albert .'ent2G)org)i dedicator) volume (17@2*, =8!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm;; o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM@0 5icholas )asmussen, .he midcentury bio&hysics bubble> Hiroshima and the biological revolution inAmerica, revisitedI, 1istor) of .cience (177;*, 8> 2=8!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm;B o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM@1 0oroya de 2hadarevian, Designs for life( %olecular biolog) after &orld &ar(2002*, 1!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm;7 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM@2 Gordon )asmussen, Picture control( The electron microscope and the transformation of biolog) inAmerica, *+9- 2*+>- (177;*, 178!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htmB0 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM@ Ibid!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htmB1 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM@= )asmussen, 178, n! @2 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htmB2 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM@8 2hadarevain, ;=, n! @1 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htmB o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM@@ Ibid! at B;, BB!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htmB= o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM@; Paul 'orman, 1ehind +uantum electronics> 5ational security as basis $or &hysical research in the /nited0tates, 17=0-17@0, 1istorical .tudies in the Ph)sical and Biological .ciences, 1B>1 (17B;*, 1;0!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htmB8 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM@B Ibid!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htmB@ o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM@7 2haderevian, BB, ;=, n! @1 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htmB; o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM;0 1arton )e&&ert, -oo"ing at the Mosco% 0ignal, the ?a&&ing o$ an #mbassy 8 years later, .he mysterylingers, &ashington Associated Press, May 22, 17BB!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htmBB o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM;1 5orman Oem&ster, Mind reading machine tells secrets o$ the brain> 0ci-'i comes true, Los Angeles Times,March 27, 17;@!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htmB7 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM;2 Ibid!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm70 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM; Oandel, n! @ above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm71 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM;= Horgan, n! =1 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm72 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM;8 0he&herd, 112, n! 8 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm7 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM;@ Horgan, n! =1 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm7= o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM;; )obert Galambos, A Glia-neural theory o$ brain $unction, Proceedings of the 7. $ational Academ) of.ciences Volume =;! 5o!1, January 18, 17@1, 1@!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm78 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM;B Ibid!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm7@ o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM;7 0he&herd, 112, 11, n! 8 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm7; o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PMB0 .heodore 1ulloc", F5eural integration at the mesosco&ic level> .he advent o$ some ideas in the last hal$century, ?ournal of the 1istor) of $euroscience, Volume = 5o!-=, 1778, 21!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm7B o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PMB1 Horgan, n! 12 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm77 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PMB2 A!A!P! -eao, 'urther observations on the s&reading de&ression o$ activity in the cerebral corte,, ?ournal of$europh)siolog), 10>=07, 5ovember 17=;! 0ee also 1! -ibet, R )!3! Gerard, 0teady &otential $ields andneurone activity, ?ournal of $europh)siolog) =>=B, 0e&tember 17=1!'or brainA#M) interactions, see )!H!3! 'un" et al!, #lectromagnetic e$$ects, $rom cell biology to medicine,Progress in 1istochemistr) and C)tochemistr) =>1B8,1B7 (2007*!'or dc brain currents, see )obert 1ec"er, #lectromagnetic $orces and li$e &rocesses, Technolog) !evie" BAAharvardmaga?ine!comA201A0;Ama&&ing-the-%ay-to-a-brain-survey! 0ee alsohtt&>AA%%%!bioethics!govAsitesAde$aultA$ilesAne%sA2hargeV20$romV20PresidentV20Jbama!&d$Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm10 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PMB@ -arry 0+uire, #ric Oandel, %emor)( #rom mind to molecules, (1777*, 8, @, ;!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm10= o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PMB; Ibid!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm108 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PMBBJean-Pierre 2hangeu,, The good, the true and the beautiful (2012*, 1;!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm10@ o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PMB7 )asmussen, 2=8, n! @0 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm10; o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM70 0+uire, &re$ace, n! 7 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm10B o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM71 2hangeu,, 1;, n! BB above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm107 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM72 2hadarevian, 1, n! @1 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm110 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM7 )ebecca -emov, &orld as laborator), E;periments "ith mice, ma'es, and men (2008*, 1B7, 170!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm111 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM7= Hans #ysenc", The future of ps)cholog), in )obert 0olso, ed!, %ind and brain sciences in the :*st Centur)(1777*, 2B!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm112 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM78 0+uire, @, ;, n! B@ above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm11 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM7@ 'rancis 2ric", &hat mad pursuit( A personal vie" of scientific discover) (17BB*, 1=7, 180!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm11= o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM7; AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm118 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM7B Ibid! at 201!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm11@ o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM77 Ibid!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm11; o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM100 88 PM101 Ibid! 0ee also 0olso, 0@, n! 7= above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm117 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM102 2hristo$ Ooch, Consciousness( confessions of a romantic reductionist (2012*, 8, @!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm120 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM10 Greg Miller, 3hat is the biological basis o$ consciousnessK .cience, @olume A-+, ?ul) *, :--,, ;7!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm121 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM10= -arry 0+uire, ed!, 1istor) of neuroscience in autobiograph), @olume * (177@*, ==@!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm122 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM108 Ibid!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm12 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM10@ AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm12= o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM10; 2ric", 180, n! 7@ above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm128 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM10B Ibid!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm12@ o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM107 George Gilder, Telecosm( 1o" infinite band"idth "ill revolutioni'e our "orld (2000*, 1@!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm12; o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM110 )obert 1ec"er, Cross currents( The perils of electropollution, the promise of electromedicine (1770*, @7!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm12B o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM111 Allan 'rey, ed!, 3n the nature of electromagnetic field interactions "ith biological s)stems (177=*, =!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm127 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM112 1everly )ubi", et! al, 1ioelectromagnetics a&&lications in medicine> )e&ort to the 5IH, (1772*!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm10 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM11 AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1= o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM11; Horgan, =2! n!1@ aboveMisled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm18 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM11B -ouis 0lesin, editorial, $ation, 1= March 17B;!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1@ o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM117 Ibid! 0ee also Ma??etti, n!above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1; o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM120 Paul )osch and Mar"o Mar"ov, ed!, Bioelectromagnetic medicine (200=*, vii!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1B o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM121 5orth, n! 118 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm17 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM122 1ec"er, Cross currents, 212, at n! 110 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1=0 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM12 Ibid! at 0=, n! 110 above! .he re&ort is> Paul .yler, -t! 2ol! AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1=7 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM12 /!0! #nvironmental Protection Agency %ebsite! 9)adiation that has enough energy to move atoms in amolecule around or cause them to vibrate, but not enough to remove electrons, is re$erred to asInon-ioni?ing radiation!I #,am&les o$ this "ind o$ radiation are sound %aves, visible light, and micro%aves!CAvailable at> htt&>AA%%%!e&a!govAradiationAunderstandAioni?eSnonioni?e!html! )obert 1ec"er,#lectromagnetism and li$e, in Andre% Marino, ed, %odern Bioelectricit) (17BB*, 1! 0ee also Andre% Marino%ebsite htt&>AAandre%amarino!comA!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm180 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1 2hristo&her Oetcham, 3arning> Lour cell &hone may be ha?ardous to your health, GentlemanBs4uarterl), 'ebruary 2010! Available at htt&>AA%%%!g+!comAcars-gearAgear-and-gadgetsA201002A%arning-cell-&hone-radiationKcurrentPageQ2!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm181 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1= Ibid!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm182 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM18 Ibid! 0ee also Marino, Going .ome"here, ;, n! 82 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm18 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1@ 1iological e$$ects o$ lo%-$re+uency electromagnetic $ields,American ?ournal of Ph)sics @=!B, 177@, 7;=! Available at> htt&>AA%or"s!be&ress!comAdha$emeiA1! 'or acriti+ue, see -e%is 0lesin, .he science and &olitics o$ the #M' &u??le> .he missing &ieces in the 'rontlinestory, %icro"ave $e"s< Available at htt&>AAmicro%avene%s!comA$ront!html!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm18= o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1; Ibid!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm188 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1B -ivingston, 2=7, n!above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm18@ o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM17 27 authors $rom ten countries, 1ioInitiative )e&ort 2012> A rationale $or biologically-based e,&osurestandards $or lo%-intensity electromagnetic radiation (#-' and )'*! Available at htt&>AA%%%!bioinitiative!orgAMisled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm18; o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1=0 Ibid!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm18B o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1=1 Oate Oelland, 5euroscience> .he ne% $ace o$ %ar$are, !euters, 'ebruary ;, 2012! Available athtt&>AA%%%!abc!net!auAscienceAarticlesA2012A02A0;A=2807!htm! 0ee also Jason Ooebler, 0cientists %arn o$ethical battle concerning military mind control, 7AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm187 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1=2 AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1@0 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1= Marino, 1, n! 12 above! 0ee also Andre% Marino %ebsite htt&>AAandre%amarino!comA!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1@1 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1== Jones, n! 1=2 above! 0ee also 0tenec", 7=, n! 1B above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1@2 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1=8 Marino, Going some"here, 1@, n! 82 above! 0ee also 0tenec", 7=, n! 1B above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1@ o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1=@ Ibid! Marino, n! 82 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1@= o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1=; Ibid! at 1@=, n! 82 above! 0ee also )e&&ert, n! ;0 above, citing an A&ril 17;7 re&ort by 0enate2ommittee on 2ommerce, 0cience and .rans&ortation critici?ing the 0tate AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1@8 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1=BIbid! Marino, n! 82 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1@@ o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1=7 Ibid, Marino, 1@=, n!82 above! 0ee also Jones, n! 1=2 above! 0ee also )e&&ert, n! ;0 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1@; o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM180 3einberger, n! @ above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1@B o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM181 Human drug testing by the 2IA, 0ubcommittee on Health and 0cienti$ic )esearch o$ the 2ommitteeon Human )esources /nited 0tates 0enate, (3ashington> /!0! GPJ, 17;;* 0e&tember 20, 21 17;;, 202! 2IAmedical doctor 0idney Gottlieb testimony!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1@7 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM182 Ibid!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1;0 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM18 0tenec", B=, 280, at n! 1B above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1;1 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM18= Ibid!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1;2 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM188 Ibid!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1; o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM18@ Ibid!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1;= o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM18; Oathleen McAuli$$e, Mind $ields, 3mni, 'ebruary 17B8!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1;8 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM18B )osch et al!, vii, n! 117 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1;@ o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM187 Vladimir 1inhi, Electromagnetic mind control( #act or fictionC A scientific vie" (2010*, 1! 0ee alsoPasterna", n! B above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1;; o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1@0 0lesin, n! 1@ above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1;B o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1@1 -ouis 0lesin, Are magnetic $ields in incubators con$ounding cell culture studiesK %icro"ave $e"s, March12, 201! Available at htt&>AAmicro%avene%s!comAne%s-centerAincubator-magnetic-$ields-con$ounding! Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1;7 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1@2 Oetcham, n! 1 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1B0 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1@ Ibid!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1B1 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1@= Ibid!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1B2 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1@8 Ibid! 0ee also Pasterna", =0, n! B above! 0ee also 1ec"er, Cross currents, ==-=;, n! 110 above! 0eealso 0tenec", 11B, n! 1B above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1B o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1@@ 0tenec", 121, n! 118 aboveMisled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1B= o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1@; Ooslov, 8B2, n! 118 above! 0ee also Ale,sander Presman, Electromagnetic fields and life, (17;0*!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1B8 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1@B Oetcham, n! 1 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1B@ o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1@7 Ooslov, 8B@, n! 118 above! 0ee also Presman, n! 1@; above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1B; o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1;0 )e&&ert, n! ;0 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1BB o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1;1 Ooslov, 8B@, n! 118 above!Misled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm1B7 o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM1;2 1ec"er, Cross currents, 0=, n! 110 above! .he re&ort is> Paul .yler, -t! 2ol! Progress and &ros&ects, Council on#oreign !elations, /C#!0, *+++< Available at htt&>AA%%%!c$r!orgAde$ense-and-securityAnonlethal-technologiesA&2@!1;7 )ichard Gar%in, Inde&endent .as" 'orce, 5onlethal %ea&ons and ca&abilities, 2'), 200=! Available athtt&>AA%%%!c$r!orgAde$ense-technologyAnonlethal-%ea&ons-ca&abilitiesA&@;7!1B0 )ichard Gar%in, email communication to 2heryl 3elsh, 2008! Jn $ile %ith author!1B1 Ibid!1B2 Oenneth 'oster, et al!, 1ioethics and the brain, EEE .pectrum, June 200, =! Available athtt&>AA%%%!eng!ucy!ac!cyAc&itrisAcoursesAece001AnotesAI###articlesA1ioethicsV20andV20theV201rainV20-V20JuneV20200!&d$!1B Ivan Jrans"y, Jbituary> 3illiam )oss Adey, Lancet, Volume @=, July 1;, 200=! Available athtt&>AA%%%!thelancet!comA6ournalsAlancetAarticleAPII001=0-@;@V2B0=V271@@77-A$ullte,t!1B= 3einberger, n! @ above!1B8 Ibid!1B@ #ditorial, 90ecret %ea&ons,: $ature, Volume =B7, 0e&tember 1, 2012, 1;;-1;B!1B; 3illiam Ar"in, Code names( Deciphering 7.< militar) plans, programs, and operations in the +D** "orld(2008*, 1!1BB Michael Oelly, Part t%o o$ 0no%denCs Guardian intervie% could re"indle the Prism Fdirect accessC debate,Business nsider, July B, 201< Available at htt&>AA%%%!businessinsider!comAsno%den-says-nsa-has-direct-access-to-tech-com&anies-201-;!1B7 Hugh Goodall, Jr!, A need to 6no"( The clandestine histor) of a CA famil) (200B*, 1, 227,20!170 Ibid!171 Ibid!172 Ibid17 Ibid!2ontents W .o&Mind Justice Home PageMisled and betrayed htt&>AAmind6ustice!orgAmisled!htm17= o$ 17= BABA2018 8>88 PM