+ All Categories
Home > Documents > mmelnady2

mmelnady2

Date post: 04-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: ahmed1581973
View: 217 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 12

Transcript
  • 8/13/2019 mmelnady2

    1/12

    PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

    This article was downloaded by: [University of Technology, Sydney]

    On: 19 December 2010

    Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 907690007]

    Publisher Taylor & Francis

    Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-

    41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK

    Petroleum Science and TechnologyPublication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713597288

    Source Rocks Evaluation of Sidi Salem-1 Well in the Onshore Nile DeltaEgyptM. M. El Nadya; F. M. HarbaaEgyptian Petroleum Research Institute, Nasr City, Hei Al-Zehour, Cairo, Egypt

    Online publication date: 03 August 2010

    To cite this ArticleNady, M. M. El and Harb, F. M.(2010) 'Source Rocks Evaluation of Sidi Salem-1 Well in the OnshoreNile Delta, Egypt', Petroleum Science and Technology, 28: 14, 1492 1502

    To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/10916460903096848URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10916460903096848

    Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf

    This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial orsystematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply ordistribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.

    The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contentswill be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug dosesshould be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss,actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly

    or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.

    http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713597288http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10916460903096848http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdfhttp://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10916460903096848http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713597288
  • 8/13/2019 mmelnady2

    2/12

    Petroleum Science and Technology, 28:14921502, 2010

    Copyright Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute

    ISSN: 1091-6466 print/1532-2459 online

    DOI: 10.1080/10916460903096848

    Source Rocks Evaluation of Sidi Salem-1 Wellin the Onshore Nile Delta, Egypt

    M. M. EL NADY1

    AND F. M. HARB1

    1Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute, Nasr City, Hei Al-Zehour,

    Cairo, Egypt

    Abstract Ten core samples representing the subsurface formation of Sidi Salem well

    No. 1, in the onshore Nile Delta, Egypt. The samples were subjected to comprehensive

    organic geochemical studies (such as rock-eval pyrolysis, gas chromatograph [GC]and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry [GC-MS]) aiming to evaluate potentialsource rocks, organic matters types, depositional environments, and maturation. The

    results revealed that the source rocks in the drilled sections are marginally mature tomature zone and have fair to good potential for generating oil and gas. These rocks

    are dominated by organic matter derived mainly from mixed organic matters (marineand terrestrial) with contributions from algae and bacteria deposited under anoxic to

    suboxic saline environments.

    Keywords Egypt, GC, GC-MS, onshore Nile Delta, pryolysis, Sidi Salem-1 well

    Introduction

    The Nile Delta basin contains potential hydrocarbon source rocks that are generated

    essentially from gas and condensates. Although the Nile Delta has been predominantly

    considered as an important gas province, the analyses of potential source rocks in the

    Miocene sequences have indicated the presence of oil in a number of wells, which may

    indicate the possible presence of commercial oil occurrence (Abdel Halim, 2001). The

    Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation (EGPC, 1994) suggested that the Oligocene

    Miocene sediments include the best source rocks in the northern Delta as indicated from

    total organic carbon (TOC) and Rock-Eval pyrolysis data. This region is divided into

    two subprovinces: the South Nile Delta block and the North Nile Delta basin separated

    by flexure zone (Zaghloul, 1976). The South Delta block is characterized by a gradualnorthward dip of top Middle Eocene carbonates. The North Delta basin is characterized

    by two main structure patterns, deep pre-Tortonian and shallow post-Meissinian fault

    patterns. The Nile Delta basin has been initiated by structures occurring in the Mesozoic

    and Cenozoic times in successive tectonic events that took place since the Paleozoic and

    mainly include (1) E-shears in the Mesozoic times and rejuvenated during the Tertiary;

    (2) NE-SW Palusium shear during the TriassicJurassic time onward associated with

    opening of the Tethys; (3) ENE Syrian Arc movements in the Late CretaceousEarly

    Tertiary associated with closure of the Tethys; (4) Tertiary transform faults including

    Address correspondence to Mohamed M. El Nady, Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute,Exploration Department, Ahmed El Zumer Street, Nasr City, Hei Al-Zehour, Cairo, 11727 Egypt.E-mail: [email protected]

    1492

  • 8/13/2019 mmelnady2

    3/12

  • 8/13/2019 mmelnady2

    4/12

    1494 M. M. El Nady and F. M. Harb

    Figure 2. The compiled lithology and stratigraphic subdivision of Sidi Salem-1 well subsurface

    section, onshore Nile Delta, Egypt.

    Techniques

    1. Rock-Eval pyrolysis was performed using a LECO CR 12 organic analyzer. Samples

    were Soxhlet extracted using chloroform. The extraction was fractionated using open-

    column liquid chromatography to saturates, aromatics, and asphaltenes.

    2. Gas chromatographic analysis of the saturated hydrocarbon fractions of some core

    samples was achieved using a Perkin Elmer Instrument Model 8700 (Waltham, MA)

    provided with a flame ionization detector (FID). Oven temperature was programmed

    for 100

    C to 320

    C at 3

    C/min and final time 20 min. The SPB-1 capillary columnwas 60 m in length. Nitrogen was used as carrier gas; the optimum flow rate was

    6 mL/min.

  • 8/13/2019 mmelnady2

    5/12

    Source Rocks Evaluation 1495

    3. Gas chromatographymass spectrometry (GC-MS) used a 50 m 0.25 mm fused

    silica capillary column of bonded SE 54 installed with a Finnigan MAT TSQ-70

    combined gas chromatography/quadrupole mass spectrometer (Waltham, MA). The

    column oven was programmed from 100C to 310C at 4C/min.

    Pyrolysis and gas chromatographic analyses of the source rocks were done in thelaboratories of the Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute (EPRI). Gas chromatography

    mass spectrometric analyses were done in the laboratories of the StratoChem (Cairo).

    Results and Discussion

    Rock-Eval Pyrolysis

    In Sidi Salem-1 well, the El Wastani Formation possesses fair organic richness with TOC

    value of 0.56 wt% and poor generative potential with S2 value of 0.41 (mg HC/g rock;

    Table 1, Figure 3a). The organic matter of this formation included gas-prone kerogen

    (Figure 4) with hydrogen index value (HI) of 73 mg HC/g TOC and quality index

    (S2/S3) of 0.46 (Table 1).

    Total organic carbon content of Kafer El Sheikh Formation varies from 0.52 to 0.76

    wt% (Table 1), indicating fair organic richness (Figure 3a). The pyrolysis-derived S2

    values are 0.38 to 0.40 (mg HC/g rock; Table 2), indicating poor generating potential

    (Figure 3b). The hydrogen index values (HI) of 53 to 77 mg HC/g TOC and quality index

    (S2/S3) ranging from 0.45 to 0.60 (Table 1) indicate that the shales of Kafer El Sheikh

    Formation contain mainly type III kerogen (mainly gas-prone organic matter; Figure 4).

    Abu Madi Formation has a TOC content of 0.54 wt%, S2 value of 0.54 (mg HC/g

    rock), HI value of 100 mg HC/g TOC, and S2/S3 ratio of 0.60 (Table 1), indicating fair

    organic richness and poor generating potential to generate gas and minor oil, respectively(Figures 3a, 3b, 4).

    Table 1

    Pyrolysis analyses of the Sidi Salem-1 well, onshore Nile Delta, Egypt a

    Core

    no.

    Depth,

    m Formations TOC S1 S2 S3 S2/S3 HI OI Tmax PI

    1

    2

    34

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    1004

    1288

    16982120

    2440

    2725

    2990

    3324

    3466

    3660

    El Wastani

    Kafer El Sheikh

    Kafer El SheikhKafer El Sheikh

    Kafer El Sheikh

    Abu Madi

    Sidi Salem

    Sidi Salem

    Sidi Salem

    Sidi Salem

    0.56

    0.52

    0.620.76

    0.73

    0.54

    0.91

    1.34

    1.60

    1.88

    0.16

    0.13

    0.650.57

    0.66

    0.45

    3.28

    3.73

    4.21

    3.83

    0.41

    0.38

    0.390.40

    0.56

    0.54

    2.10

    2.50

    2.61

    2.11

    0.89

    0.68

    0.820.88

    0.94

    0.90

    1.14

    1.44

    1.73

    1.28

    0.46

    0.56

    0.480.45

    0.60

    0.60

    1.84

    1.74

    1.51

    1.65

    73

    73

    6353

    77

    100

    231

    187

    168

    112

    159

    131

    132116

    129

    167

    125

    107

    108

    145

    434

    435

    434435

    434

    435

    435

    435

    436

    438

    0.48

    0.45

    0.500.59

    0.54

    0.45

    0.61

    0.52

    0.62

    0.64

    aTOC: total organic carbon (weight percentage of the whole rock); S1: low hydrocarbon yieldand values are mg hydrocarbon/g rock; S2: residual petroleum potential (mg HC/g rock); S3:organic CO2-kerogen derived (mg CO2/g rock); S2/S3: hydrogen/oxygen ratio (quality index); HI:

    hydrogen index (mg HC/g TOC); OI: oxygen index (mg CO2/g TOC); Tmax: temperature at whichmaximum emission of high temperature (S2) hydrocarbons occurs (C); PI: production index DS1/S1 C S2.

  • 8/13/2019 mmelnady2

    6/12

    1496 M. M. El Nady and F. M. Harb

    Figure 3. Geochemical evaluation (Peters, 1986) of studied formations in the Sidi Salem-1 well,

    Nile Delta, Egypt.

    Sidi Salem Formation possesses fair to good organic richness with TOC values

    ranging from 0.91 to 1.88 wt% and fair generative potential with S2 values from 2.10 to

    2.61 mg HC/g rock (Table 1, Figure 3). The organic matter of this formation comprised

    both gas- and oil-prone kerogen (Figure 4) with hydrogen index values (HI) of 112

    to 231 mg HC/g TOC (Table 1) and quality index (S2/S3) ranging from 1.51 to 1.84(Table 1).

    Figure 4. HI versus OI of organic matters types (Espitalie et al., 1977) of the studied formations

    in the Sidi Salem-1 well, Nile Delta, Egypt.

  • 8/13/2019 mmelnady2

    7/12

    Source Rocks Evaluation 1497

    Table 2

    GC and GC-MS analyses of the Sidi Salem-1 well, onshore Nile Delta, Egypt a

    Core

    no.

    Depth,

    m Formations

    Pr/

    Ph

    Pr/

    n-C17

    Ph/

    n-C18 CPI

    Ts/

    Tm Indexa

    Indexb

    Indexc

    C29(20S)/20

    (S CR)

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    1004

    1288

    1698

    2120

    2440

    2725

    2990

    3324

    3466

    3660

    El Wastani

    Kafer El Sheikh

    Kafer El Sheikh

    Kafer El Sheikh

    Kafer El Sheikh

    Abu Madi

    Sidi Salem

    Sidi Salem

    Sidi Salem

    Sidi Salem

    1.61

    2.25

    1.11

    2.35

    1.44

    1.38

    2.20

    1.30

    0.74

    0.66

    0.32

    0.46

    0.25

    0.56

    0.37

    0.37

    0.15

    0.16

    0.10

    0.13

    0.28

    0.51

    0.29

    0.63

    0.48

    0.39

    0.34

    0.49

    0.45

    0.33

    1.01

    1.03

    0.90

    0.99

    0.89

    1.02

    1.07

    1.04

    1.01

    0.95

    0.73

    0.59

    0.61

    0.52

    0.71

    0.54

    0.80

    0.53

    0.68

    0.63

    0.17

    0.12

    0.19

    0.34

    0.45

    0.57

    0.39

    0.06

    0.03

    0.01

    0.56

    0.64

    0.5

    0.49

    0.57

    0.65

    0.58

    0.38

    0.18

    0.35

    0.05

    0.04

    0.06

    0.04

    0.08

    0.04

    0.71

    0.08

    0.04

    0.06

    0.51

    0.63

    0.57

    0.49

    0.75

    0.63

    0.58

    0.53

    0.59

    0.64

    a

    Pr/Ph: pristane/phytane ratio; Pr/n-C17: pristane/n-alkane ratio; Ph/n-C18 : phytane/n-alkane ratio; CPI:carbon preference index D odd/even carbon atoms; Ts/Tm: trisnorhopanes/trisnorneohopanes ratios; Indexa

    homohopane index D (C35 homohopane S C R)/(C31 C C32 C C33 C C34 C C35 homohopanes S C R);

    Indexb: gammacerane index D gammacerane/(gammaceraneCC30 hopane); Indexc: diasteranes indexD (C27

    diasteranes S C R)/[(C27 diasteranes CR) C C29 steranes S C R)]

    Biological Markers Characteristics

    Normal Alkanes. The distribution of normal alkanes and isoprenoids in the source rocks is

    helpful in identifying the genetic origin and source environments (Peters and Moldowan,

    1993). Fingerprints of gas chromatography for the saturated hydrocarbons of the studied

    formations are shown in Figure 5. It is obvious that n-alkanes in the range ofn-C15 to n-

    C25 are more abundant (Figure 5a), suggesting marine organic matters with contribution

    from algae and planktons (Peters and Moldowan, 1993). The pristane/phytane (pr/ph)

    ratios are 0.66 and 2.35 (Table 2), reflecting source rock deposited under anoxic to

    suboxic conditions. The isoprenoids/n-alkanes ratios (pr/n-C17 and ph/n-C18) are 0.10

    0.46 and 0.280.63, respectively (Table 2), suggesting contribution from mixed or-

    ganic sources mainly from Type II algal marine deposited under reducing conditions

    (Figure 6).

    Tricyclic Terpanes. The concentration of tricyclic terpanes in crude oils is more sensitiveto the specific paleoenvironments (Waples and Machihara, 1992; Andrew et al., 2001).

    Also, it has been used as a qualitative indicator of maturity (Van Grass, 1990). In our

    study the concentration of tricyclic terpanes (22R and 22S, peaks A and B; see peak

    identifications in Table 3) is slight higher in the source rocks of the Sidi Salem formations

    (Figure 7). This indicates mature source rocks that are mainly of marine origin. This

    result is supported by other parameters such as the ratio of Ts (trisnorneohopane) to

    Tm (trisnorhopane), which is more than 0.5 (Table 2) that increases as the portion of

    shale in calcareous facies decreases (Riva et al., 1989; Hunt, 1996). The concentration of

    C29 norneohopane (peak G) is lower than C30 hopane (peak I); a low abundance of C30

    moretane, gammacerance, and slightly highly concentration of bisnorhopanes (Figure 7,peaks E, J, and K, respectively) also indicate thermal maturity according to Philip (1985),

    Mann et al. (1987), Riediger et al. (1990), and Waples and Machihara, (1992).

  • 8/13/2019 mmelnady2

    8/12

    1498 M. M. El Nady and F. M. Harb

    Figure 5. Representative gas chromatograms of studied formations in the Sidi Salem-1 well,

    onshore Nile Delta, Egypt.

    Steranes. The source rocks of Sidi Salem well have a relatively high percentage of C28steranes (20S and 20R; peaks F to I) and C29 steranes (peak J) compared to C27 steranes

    (20S and 20R; peaks C and D), and a low concentration of C 27diasteranes peaks A and B

    (Figure 8a; see peak identifications in Table 3) indicates terrestrial organic origin. On the

    other hand, the diasterane index of these formations ranging from 0.03 to 0.08 (Table 2)

    confirms this conclusion. The Abu Madi Formation C27 and C29 diasteranes (20S and

    Figure 6. Plot of pristane/n-C17 versus phytane/n-C18 (Shanmugam, 1985) showing the organic

    sources and maturation of studied formations in the Sidi Salem-1 well, onshore Nile Delta, Egypt.

  • 8/13/2019 mmelnady2

    9/12

    Source Rocks Evaluation 1499

    Table 3

    Identification of peaks in triterpanes (m/z 191) and steranes (m/z 217)

    mass fragmentograms

    Triterpanes (m/z 191) Steranes (m/z 217)

    Peaks Compound name Peaks Compound name

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    G

    H

    IJ

    K

    L

    M

    Tricyclic terpane (22R)

    Tricyclic terpane (22S)

    Trisnorhopane (Ts)

    Trisnorhopane (Tm)

    Bisonorhopans

    C29 Norhopanes

    C29 Norneohopane

    C29 Normoretane

    C30 HopaneC30 Moretane

    C30 Gammacerance

    C31 Homohopane (22S)

    C31 Homohopane (22R)

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    G

    H

    IJ

    C27 diasterane (20S)

    C27 diasterane (20R)

    C27 sterane (20S)

    C27 sterane (20S)

    C29 diasterane (20R)

    C28 sterane (20S)

    C28 sterane (20R)

    C28 sterane (20S)

    C28 sterane (20R)C29 sterane (20S)

    20R) are high (peaks A, B, and E, Table 3 and Figure 8c) with relatively high diasteranes

    index value (0.71, Table 2). This reflects source rock rich in terrestrial organic matters

    (Waples and Machihara, 1992; Hunt, 1996).

    This conclusion agrees very well the environment assigned independently by theInternational Egyptian oil based on a biostratigraphic basis. El Wastani Formation of

    fluvial-marine environments, Kafer El Skeikh of marine environment at top and volatile

    Figure 7. Ion fragmentograms of triterpanes (m/z 191) of studied formations in the Sidi Salem-1

    well, onshore Nile Delta, Egypt.

  • 8/13/2019 mmelnady2

    10/12

    1500 M. M. El Nady and F. M. Harb

    Figure 8. Ion fragmentograms of steranes (m/z 217) of studied formations in the Sidi Salem-1

    well, onshore Nile Delta, Egypt.

    at bottom. Abu Madi is possibly fluvial-marine. Sidi Salem is very possibly a marine

    environment. Actually, the environment of deposition in general seem to be oscillating

    between fluvial and marine.

    Maturation

    Tmax values of the Sidi Salem formations ranged from 434C to 438C (Table 1),

    indicating marginally mature source rocks. The Tmax values indicate marginally mature

    source rocks for El Wastani, Kafer El Sheikh, and Abu Madi formations and the Tmax

    for Sidi Salem Formation (Figure 3c) indicates mature source rocks. This agrees with

    the production index (PI), where it ranges from 0.45 to 0.64 (Table 1, Figure 3d). The

    C29 steranes 20S/20S C 20R ranged from 0.51 to 0.75. Ts/Tm ratios ranged from 0.33

    to 0.80 (Table 2), indicating mature source rocks (Petersen et al., 2000; Andrew et al.,

    2001).

    Conclusions

    Rock-Eval pyrolysis and biomarker analyses of the subsurface rocks (El Wastani, Kafer

    El Sheikh, Abu Madi, Sidi Salem) in drilled sections of Sidi Salem-1 well in the onshore

    Nile Delta revealed that the source rocks are marginally mature to mature and have fair

    to good potential for generating oil and gas. These rocks are dominated by organic matter

    derived mainly from mixed marine and terrestrial sources with contributions from algae

    and bacteria deposited under anoxic to suboxic saline environments.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors are grateful to the authorities of the Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation

    for permitting the publication of this work. Thanks are due to the StratoChem and

  • 8/13/2019 mmelnady2

    11/12

    Source Rocks Evaluation 1501

    Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute (EPRI), Cairo, Egypt, for the different organo-

    geochemical analyses.

    References

    Abel Halim, A. (2001). Future hydrocarbon potential in the Nile Delta offshore and onshore. 1st

    International Symposium on the Deltas, Modern and Ancient, Cairo, Egypt, pp. 159174.

    Abu El-Ella, R. (1990). Maturation history of Neogen-Quaternary sediment, Nile Delta Basin,

    Egypt. AAPG Bull. 74:7784.

    Andrew, D. R., David, Z. J., Moldowan, M., and Ulderico, B. (2001). Upper Oligocene lacustrine

    source rocks and petroleum systems of the northern Qaidan Basin, northwest China. AAPG

    Bull. 85:601619.

    Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation. (1994). Nile Delta and North Sinai. Fields Discoveries

    and Hydrocarbon Potentials (A Comprehensive Overview). Internal report 387p, Cairo, Egypt.

    El Nady, M. M. (2006). Origin and composition of liquid hydrocarbons and natural gases of some

    wells in the offshore Nile Delta, Egypt. J. Egypt. Petrol. 15:6175.

    El Nady, M. M. (2007). Organic geochemistry of source rocks, condensates and thermal geochem-

    ical modeling of the Miocene sequence of some wells, onshore Nile Delta, Egypt. J. Petrol.

    Sci. Tech. 25:791817.

    Espitalie, J., Laporte, L., Madec, M., Marquis, F., Leplate, P., Pault, J., and Boutefeu, A. (1977).

    Methode rapid de caracterisation des rocks meres, deleur potential petrolier et leurdegre

    devolution. Rev. Inst. Fr. Petrol. 32:2342.

    Halim, A. A., Fouda, O., Worku, T., Khaled, A. A., and Fawzi, H. E. (1996). Aspect of reservoir

    potential of the Miocene-Pliocene sequences in the North Alexandria and surrounding areas,

    offshore Nile Delta, Egypt. EGPC, 13th Petroleum Exploration and Production Conference,

    Cairo, Egypt, Vol. 1, pp. 277292.

    Hammad, M. M. (2000). New approach of geochemical sequence stratigraphy of Late-Middle

    Miocene source rock (Sidi Salem Formation) and evaluation of its hydrocarbons potentialityin the northern Nile Delta, Egypt. 15th International Conference on Petroleum and the

    Environment, pp. 271284.

    Helmy, M., and Fouad, O. (1994). Prospectively and play assessment of Abu Qir area, Nile Delta,

    Egypt. EGPC, 13th Petroleum Exploration and Production Conference , Cairo, Egypt, Vol. 1,

    pp. 277292.

    Hunt, J. M. (1996). Petroleum Geochemistry and Geology. New York: Freeman and Company.

    Kamel, H., Eita, M. T., and Sarhan, M. (1998). Nile Delta hydrocarbon potentiality. EGPC, 14th

    Petroleum Exploration and Production Conference, Cairo, Egypt, Vol. 2, pp. 785503.

    Mann, A. L., Goodwin, N. S., and Lowe, S. (1987). Geochemical characteristics of lacustrine

    source rocks: A combined palynological/molecular study of a tertiary sequences from off

    shore, China. Proceedings of the Petroleum Association, 60th Annual Convention, Jakarta,

    Indonesia, pp. 241258.

    Metwalli, M. H. (2000). A new concept for the petroleum geology of the Nile Delta, A. R. First

    International Conference on Geology of Arab World (GAW), Cairo, Egypt, Vol. 2, pp. 713734.

    Peters, K. E. (1986). Guidelines for evaluating petroleum source rock using programmed pyrolysis.

    AAPG Bull. 70:318329.

    Peters, K. E., and Moldowan, J. M. (1993). The Biomarkers Guide. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice

    Hall.

    Petersen, H. I., Andsbjerg, J., Bojesen-Koefoed, J. A., and Nytoft, H. P. (2000). Coal-generated

    oil: Source rock evaluation and petroleum geochemistry of the Lulita Oilfield, Danish North

    Sea. J. Petrol. Geol. 23:5599.

    Philp, R. P. (1985). Fossil Fuel Biomarkers. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Riediger, C. L., Foweler, M. G., Brooks, P. W., and Snowdon, L. R. (1990). Triassic oils andpotential Mesozoic source rocks, Peace River Arch area, Western Canada Basin. J. Org.

    Geochem. 16:295305.

  • 8/13/2019 mmelnady2

    12/12

    1502 M. M. El Nady and F. M. Harb

    Riva, A., Riolo, J., Mycke, B., Ocampo, R., Callot, H. J., Albrecht, P., and Nali, M. (1989). Molec-

    ular parameters in Italian carbonate oils: Reconstruction of past depositional environments.

    Abstract No. 335, 14th International Meeting Organic Geochemistry, Paris.

    Shanmugam, G. (1985). Significance of coniferous rain frost and related organic matter in gener-

    ating commercial quantities of oil, Gippsland Basin, Australia. AAPG Bull. 69:12411254.

    Van Grass, G. W. (1990). Biomarker maturity parameters for high maturates: Calibration of theworking range up to the oil/condensates threshold. J. Org. Geochem. 16:10251032.

    Waples, D. W., and Machihara, T. (1992). Biomarkers for Geologists. A Practical Guide to the

    Application of Steranes and Triterpanes in Petroleum Geology. AAPG Methods in Exploration

    Series.

    Zaghloul, Z. M. (1976). Stratigraphy of Nile Delta. Alexandria, Egypt: UNSCO.

    Zaghloul, Z. M., Shaaban, F. F., and Youssef, F. A. (2001). Mesozoic and Cenozoic sedimentary

    basins, Nile Delta, Egypt. 1st International Symposium on the Deltas, Modern and Ancient,

    Cairo, Egypt, pp. 2133.

    Zein El Din, M. Y., Hegazi, A., and Nashaat, M. (1988). The use of geopressure data as a new

    tool for exploration in the Nile delta Egypt. EGPC 9th Petroleum Exploration and Production

    Conference, Cairo, Egypt.