Date post: | 22-May-2015 |
Category: |
Technology |
Upload: | pier-paolo-ficarelli |
View: | 570 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Content Management Process in Selected m-Agriculture Initiatives in India
Pier Paolo Ficarelli
What some say about m-Agriculture
2
• What is the use of delivering market information to a farmer with a phone, if there is no road to market the produce (IFAD, report 2003)
• M-agriculture is about tools, not about access and dissemination of agricultural information (FAO, Rome 2010)
• We have farmer field schools for extension. Mobiles add no value to it.
(CGIAR Researcher, Delhi, 2011) • Use of mobiles in rural areas is the last tactic for squeezing money at
the bottom of the pyramid (GIZ staff, Delhi 2010)
Defining Content Management for ICT
3
• Combine information system and information chain concepts (Heeks 2005,2007) • The Info system describes contextual factors influencing information
conveyance to users (design-reality check!)• The info chain defines relevance as the functional linkages from content all the
way through to users • Feedback from users as a key feature
Source: Glendenning & Ficarelli, 2011
Managing Relevant Content Means:
4
• Highly processed and refined information relevant to local need and context
• Verifiable, clear and accurate content, delivered timely in an appropriate format and language
• A time and resource intensive process, normally underestimated • A learning PROCESS that requires continuous improvement• Co-evolving content & technology apps in the social space of users
Source: Glendenning & Ficarelli, 2011
m-Agriculture Case Studies
5
Common features of cases– Sizable scale – Targeted to farmers – Low-cost devices – Exemplary content generation/delivery mechanisms – Innovative business models
Main research questions– How relevant content is generated and managed by the different initiatives? – To what extent the initiatives analysed strengthen key extension functions?– Is human intermediation a key success factor? – Is digital agro-information made more accessible through ICTs? – What kind of mobile app and/or media are most suitable for m-agriculture?– Where does lay the mainstreaming potential for m-Agriculture?
Case 1: Reuters Market Light (RML)
6
• Agency: Thomson Reuters (2007) • Business model: spin off mobile VAS of Thomson Reuters• Scale: + 15 000 villages 13 states 8 languages (2010)• Info Type: push model (SMS; voice messages on testing)• Content sources: various
Source: Glendenning & Ficarelli, 2011
Case 2: IFFCO Kisan Sanchar Limited (IKSL)
7
• Agency: IFFCO & Bharti Airtel (2007) • Business model: Partnership with major mobile operator • Scale: 1 million active users over 18 states• Info Type: push & pull model (Voice messages + Helpline)• Content sources: various; content managers, experts
Case 3: Lifelines
8
• Agency: OneWorld.net British Telecom & Cisco (2006) • Business model: funded project • Scale: 150,000 farmers 2,000 villages in 3 Indian states (2010)• Info Type: pull model (IVR audio Q&A platform)• Content sources: Farmers & FAQ Database
Content Management in the Case Studies
9
Need identification All initiatives have carried out systematic farmer surveys to identify information gaps
SourcingAcademic/Researcher knowledge and young graduates : Lifelines, IKSL; Hired
professionals Databases: RML; International Organizations: IKSL
Localisation Lifelines = Q&A; RML= subscriber details/local data collectors; IKSL= agro-ecological zones/crop calendars
Format & AdaptationIKSL: Fact sheets/voice messages RML: SMS (voice); Lifelines: audio files /transcripts
Storage and retrieval All initiatives rely on the development of their own digital repositories
Delivery Automated daily: IKSL, RML; Q&A: Lifelines, IKSL with human intermediation
Learning & FeedbackLifelines IKSL: Internal quality audits; RML: ?
Content Management: Key Challenges
10
FormatLimits of SMS and voice messages on mobile for agro-advisory: Videos? Audio + Pictures?
SourcingContent is dispersed and scattered: Agri-Google? Experts: 24H Access? Motivation?
AccessIdentified trend is towards close access of digital repositories: Regulations?
LocalisationMainly based on outsiders’ knowledge and area criteria: Farmer knowledge?
QualityIt is delegated to experts and relies on implicit knowledge: External validation?
FeedbackClient satisfaction mainly anecdotal/based on sample surveys: Sufficient?
“Infomediaries”Info-need articulation and advice translation require human facilitation: Viable?
m-Agriculture: Mainstreaming Potential
11
Agro-information dissemination – All initiatives seem very successful in the delivery of micro-information, otherwise unavailable
to farmers (weather, local market prices, pest & disease alerts, agro-news, standard agricultural practices, government programmes etc.)
Scale of farmer outreach – All initiatives have shown the capacity of reaching and delivering some agro-advisory services
to a large number of farmers in their field and in potentially viable way
Farmer-Expert links – Some initiatives show the possibility of facilitating direct expert – famer linkages and
customisation of agro-information to farmer demands through Q&A at a scale
Customisation of Information– All initiative are showing the potential of “personalising” information based on farmer profiles
in digital form
Use of different media – All initiatives indicates the potential of mobile as a multipurpose communication platform to
increase effectiveness of content delivery and interactivity for farmers and field staff
m- Agriculture: Success Factors?
12
Bottom-up integration into existing service models
Viability and affordability
Mobile operator or mobile VAS involvement
PPP arrangements
Content validation mechanisms
Youth entrepreneurship development Innovation and R&D
Why keep engaging with m-Agriculture
13
The problem with the world is not that people know too little, but that they know many things that ain't so
Mark Twain