+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Molly E. Brown + Jorge E. Pinzon + Jeffery T. Morisette x Kamel Didan* Compton J. Tucker x

Molly E. Brown + Jorge E. Pinzon + Jeffery T. Morisette x Kamel Didan* Compton J. Tucker x

Date post: 31-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: lee-silva
View: 35 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Inter-Sensor Validation of NDVI time series from AVHRR, SPOT-Vegetation, SeaWIFS, MODIS, and LandSAT ETM+. Molly E. Brown + Jorge E. Pinzon + Jeffery T. Morisette x Kamel Didan* Compton J. Tucker x + SSAI, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center * Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
13
1 Molly E. Brown, PhD Dec 15, 2004 AGU Inter-Sensor Validation of NDVI time series from AVHRR, SPOT-Vegetation, SeaWIFS, MODIS, and LandSAT ETM+ Molly E. Brown + Jorge E. Pinzon + Jeffery T. Morisette x Kamel Didan* Compton J. Tucker x + SSAI, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center * Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences Greenbelt, MD 20771 University of Arizona x NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD 20771
Transcript

1Molly E. Brown, PhDDec 15, 2004 AGU

Inter-Sensor Validation of NDVI time series from

AVHRR, SPOT-Vegetation, SeaWIFS,

MODIS, and LandSAT ETM+ Molly E. Brown +

Jorge E. Pinzon+

Jeffery T. Morisettex

Kamel Didan*

Compton J. Tuckerx

+ SSAI, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center * Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences

Greenbelt, MD 20771 University of Arizona

xNASA Goddard Space Flight Center

  Greenbelt, MD 20771

Dec 15, 2004 AGU Molly E. Brown, PhD 2

Overview• Data used in study

– Global NDVI datasets, LandSAT ETM+ for comparison

• Methods– Spectral, spatial and temporal considerations– Global 1 degree datasets– CEOS sites and drought locations

• Results • Discussion – data continuity from AVHRR

through MODIS to VIIRS

Dec 15, 2004 AGU Molly E. Brown, PhD 3

VIS/NIR/SWIR Band Comparison

AVHRR

SeaWiFS

VGT

MODIS

Differences in spectral range will necessitate increased processing in AVHRR and SPOT due to water vapor sensitivity.

Dec 15, 2004 AGU Molly E. Brown, PhD 4

DataSensor Data Source Spatial

ResolutionTime

domain

Temporal Resolution

AVHRR GIMMS NDVIg

Pinzon et al (2005)

8000 m

1 degree

81-04

280 mon

15 day

monthly

SPOT VGT

FAS-GIMMS, VITO

Achard, F. et al. (1992)

1000 m

1 degree

98-04

67 mon

10 day

monthly

MODIS

NDVI

MODIS-Land, University of Arizona (K.Didan)

Huete, A. et al. (2002)

~5000 m, 500m

1 degree

00-04

52 mon

16 day

monthly

SeaWIFS SeaWIFS / GSFC / GIMMS

Tucker et al (2002)

4633 m

1 degree

97-02

62 mon

monthly

LandSAT CEOS website

Morisette et al (2004)

30 m 1-9 scenes

periodic

Dec 15, 2004 AGU Molly E. Brown, PhD 5

Validation Methods:59 Sites

• Aggregations to monthly time step and 1 degree resolution for pixel by pixel comparison.

• Global hemispherical means created to provide direct comparison of NDVI behavior.

• Comparisons of time series created from 25x25 km box at native temporal and spatial resolutions: CEOS sites, locations of droughts, deserts, agricultural production regions, etc.

• Anomaly and seasonal characteristics evaluated• Atmospherically corrected, 25x25km subsets of selected LandSAT

ETM+ scenes provide a base for comparison of datasets.

CEOS Land Validation Sites

Dec 15, 2004 AGU Molly E. Brown, PhD 6

Maps of NDVI correlation at 1degree

Dec 15, 2004 AGU Molly E. Brown, PhD 7

Global averages show that

•Four sensors have similar signals.

•Improvements in AVHRR NDVI have reduced many differences between the sensors, enabling a direct comparison between the records:

•Longer base means for anomaly•Multiple data sources for NDVI•More work to be done for data integration to be operational

Dec 15, 2004 AGU Molly E. Brown, PhD 8

Note: similarity in range, seasonality of NDVILandSAT scene range of variation Differences in treatment of winter, clouds

Correlations:AV-SP 0.89AV-MO 0.84AV-SW 0.86

Results from CEOS Sites: Harvard, Massachusetts

Dec 15, 2004 AGU Molly E. Brown, PhD 9

Correlations:AV-SP 0.59AV-MO 0.65AV-SW 0.59

Correlations:AV-SP 0.85AV-MO 0.82AV-SW 0.66

Dec 15, 2004 AGU Molly E. Brown, PhD 10

MODIS cloud and aerosol atmospheric correction explains the differences between MODIS and the other sensors.

CorrelationsAV-SP 0.60AV-MO 0.33AV-SW 0.38

+

Dec 15, 2004 AGU Molly E. Brown, PhD 11

Anomaly Time Series: Drought Detection

Dec 15, 2004 AGU Molly E. Brown, PhD 12

Conclusions• Many lessons have been learned from the creation of a

consistent NDVI record from AVHRR– How to integrate sensors with different gains (NOAA

7-14 and NOAA 16-17)– Overcome sensor limitations to reduce clouds, reduce

noise and improve image coherence• More work to be done on further integrating the records of

AVHRR, MODIS, SPOT, SeaWIFS to maximize their various strengths, minimizing their weaknesses

• AVHRR – MODIS – VIIRS data continuity will be required to maximize length of record to answer important science questions

Dec 15, 2004 AGU Molly E. Brown, PhD 13

• Thanks go to Brad Doorn, Assaf Anyamba and Jennifer Small for providing the SPOT data, Gene Feldman, Norman Kuring and Jacques Descloitres for the monthly global SeaWIFS data.

• URLs: – GIMMS NDVIg: http://landcover.org– SeaWIFS:

http://daac.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/dataset/SEAWIFS_LAND– MODIS: http://edcdaac.usgs.gov/modis/dataproducts.asp– SPOT VGT: http://free.vgt.vito.be/– Subsets of SPOT, AVHRR, MODIS tiles, and Landsat ETM+

data at CEOS sites: http://landval.gsfc.nasa.gov/MODIS/index.php

Thank you!


Recommended