+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Monopolis tic Competition - · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed...

Monopolis tic Competition - · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed...

Date post: 12-Feb-2018
Category:
Upload: doanliem
View: 213 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
91
Monopolistic Competition Today’s Topics: Brands and Advertising 1. Between Monopoly and Perfect Competition: (pp. 320-322) number of sellers? type of products? oligopolies, monopolistic competition. 2. Monopolistic Competition: (pp. 368-373) competition in the short run, in the long run; compared with perfect competition, and efficiency. 3. Advertising: (pp. 374-379) pros and cons, as a signal of quality, brand names. >
Transcript
Page 1: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

Monopolis tic Competition

Today’s Topics: Brands and Adver tising

1. Between Monopoly and Per fect Competition: (pp.320−322) number of sellers? type of products?oligopolies, monopolistic competition.

2. Monopolis tic Competition: (pp. 368−373)competition in the short run, in the long run;compared with per fect competition, andef ficiency.

3. Advertising: (pp. 374−379) pros and cons, as asignal of quality, brand names.

>

Page 2: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 2

1. Between Two Poles

Number of Sellers:

One A Fe w Many

Homogenous Homogeneous Pure

Product Pure Oligopol y Compe tition

Dif ferentiat ed Monopol y Dif ferentiat ed Monopolis tic

Product Oligopol y Compe tition

Assume: Man y Buyers

“I think it’s wrong only one company makes the game Monopoly”

— US humor ist, Steve Wright

< >

Page 3: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 2

1. Between Two Poles

Number of Sellers:

One A Fe w Many

Homogenous Homogeneous Pure

Product Pure Oligopol y Compe tition

Dif ferentiat ed Monopol y Dif ferentiat ed Monopolis tic

Product Oligopol y Compe tition

Assume: Man y Buyers

“I think it’s wrong only one company makes the game Monopoly”

— US humor ist, Steve Wright

Oligopol y: a market str ucture in which only a few seller sof fer similar or identical products. Often behavestrategicall y. (Ne xt lecture.) Examples?

< >

Page 4: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 2

1. Between Two Poles

Number of Sellers:

One A Fe w Many

Homogenous Homogeneous Pure

Product Pure Oligopol y Compe tition

Dif ferentiat ed Monopol y Dif ferentiat ed Monopolis tic

Product Oligopol y Compe tition

Assume: Man y Buyers

“I think it’s wrong only one company makes the game Monopoly”

— US humor ist, Steve Wright

Oligopol y: a market str ucture in which only a few seller sof fer similar or identical products. Often behavestrategicall y. (Ne xt lecture.) Examples?

Monopolis tic Compe tition: a market str ucture in whichmany firms sell products that are similar but notidentical.

< >

Page 5: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 3

Dif ferentiat ed Products

< >

Page 6: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 3

Dif ferentiat ed Products

Homogeneous

or

< >

Page 7: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 3

Dif ferentiat ed Products

Homogeneous

or

Dif ferentiat ed?

< >

Page 8: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 3

Dif ferentiat ed Products

Homogeneous

or

Dif ferentiat ed?

Deg ree of Substitut ability?

Dif ferent Attr ibutes:

< >

Page 9: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 3

Dif ferentiat ed Products

Homogeneous

or

Dif ferentiat ed?

Deg ree of Substitut ability?

Dif ferent Attr ibutes:

• Physical Attr ibutes

< >

Page 10: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 3

Dif ferentiat ed Products

Homogeneous

or

Dif ferentiat ed?

Deg ree of Substitut ability?

Dif ferent Attr ibutes:

• Physical Attr ibutes

• Ancillar y Ser vices

< >

Page 11: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 3

Dif ferentiat ed Products

Homogeneous

or

Dif ferentiat ed?

Deg ree of Substitut ability?

Dif ferent Attr ibutes:

• Physical Attr ibutes

• Ancillar y Ser vices

• Geog raphical Location

< >

Page 12: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 3

Dif ferentiat ed Products

Homogeneous

or

Dif ferentiat ed?

Deg ree of Substitut ability?

Dif ferent Attr ibutes:

• Physical Attr ibutes

• Ancillar y Ser vices

• Geog raphical Location

• Subjective Image

Examples?< >

Page 13: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 4

2. Monopolistic Competition

For a firm wit h some market power in a market withwit h ot her firms selling close substitut es,

< >

Page 14: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 4

2. Monopolistic Competition

For a firm wit h some market power in a market withwit h ot her firms selling close substitut es, there iscompetition as firms enter,

< >

Page 15: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 4

2. Monopolistic Competition

For a firm wit h some market power in a market withwit h ot her firms selling close substitut es, there iscompetition as firms enter, and change the prices of theclose substitut es,

< >

Page 16: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 4

2. Monopolistic Competition

For a firm wit h some market power in a market withwit h ot her firms selling close substitut es, there iscompetition as firms enter, and change the prices of theclose substitut es, which results in a shift to the left inthe demand curve that our firm faces.

< >

Page 17: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 4

2. Monopolistic Competition

For a firm wit h some market power in a market withwit h ot her firms selling close substitut es, there iscompetition as firms enter, and change the prices of theclose substitut es, which results in a shift to the left inthe demand curve that our firm faces.

→ Monopolis tic Compe tition

(If we raise our price 5%, will we still sell anyt hing tobuyer s in full knowledge of other s’ prices?

< >

Page 18: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 4

2. Monopolistic Competition

For a firm wit h some market power in a market withwit h ot her firms selling close substitut es, there iscompetition as firms enter, and change the prices of theclose substitut es, which results in a shift to the left inthe demand curve that our firm faces.

→ Monopolis tic Compe tition

(If we raise our price 5%, will we still sell anyt hing tobuyer s in full knowledge of other s’ prices? Yes → wehave some market power.)

< >

Page 19: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 4

2. Monopolistic Competition

For a firm wit h some market power in a market withwit h ot her firms selling close substitut es, there iscompetition as firms enter, and change the prices of theclose substitut es, which results in a shift to the left inthe demand curve that our firm faces.

→ Monopolis tic Compe tition

(If we raise our price 5%, will we still sell anyt hing tobuyer s in full knowledge of other s’ prices? Yes → wehave some market power.)

Examples?

< >

Page 20: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 5

Conditions for Monop. Comp.

< >

Page 21: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 5

Conditions for Monop. Comp.

1. Man y sellers competing by selling differentiat ed(such as branded) products.

< >

Page 22: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 5

Conditions for Monop. Comp.

1. Man y sellers competing by selling differentiat ed(such as branded) products.

2. Because the products are dif ferentiat ed(subs titut es, but not per fect substitut es), eachfir m faces a downwards-sloping demand curveand has some market power to det ermine price.

< >

Page 23: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 5

Conditions for Monop. Comp.

1. Man y sellers competing by selling differentiat ed(such as branded) products.

2. Because the products are dif ferentiat ed(subs titut es, but not per fect substitut es), eachfir m faces a downwards-sloping demand curveand has some market power to det ermine price.

3. Fr ee entr y or exit from the market : until zeroeconomic profits for all.

< >

Page 24: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 5

Conditions for Monop. Comp.

1. Man y sellers competing by selling differentiat ed(such as branded) products.

2. Because the products are dif ferentiat ed(subs titut es, but not per fect substitut es), eachfir m faces a downwards-sloping demand curveand has some market power to det ermine price.

3. Fr ee entr y or exit from the market : until zeroeconomic profits for all.

4. Firms do not collude or behave strat egically: theyassume competit ors’ actions fixed.

< >

Page 25: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 5

Conditions for Monop. Comp.

1. Man y sellers competing by selling differentiat ed(such as branded) products.

2. Because the products are dif ferentiat ed(subs titut es, but not per fect substitut es), eachfir m faces a downwards-sloping demand curveand has some market power to det ermine price.

3. Fr ee entr y or exit from the market : until zeroeconomic profits for all.

4. Firms do not collude or behave strat egically: theyassume competit ors’ actions fixed.

5. Buyer s are price taker s; no bargaining.

< >

Page 26: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 6

In the Short RunFive points:

1.

< >

Page 27: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 6

In the Short RunFive points:

1. Pr ices of substitut es af fect the downwards-sloping demand curve. (imper fect substitut es)

2.

< >

Page 28: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 6

In the Short RunFive points:

1. Pr ices of substitut es af fect the downwards-sloping demand curve. (imper fect substitut es)

2. Assume that each firm takes other s’ actions

cons tant & then se ts sales y *SR so that

MR (y *SR ) = MC (y *

SR ) (SR = Shor t Run)

to maximize its profit. This results in the short-

run price: y *SR → P *

SR .

3.

< >

Page 29: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 6

In the Short RunFive points:

1. Pr ices of substitut es af fect the downwards-sloping demand curve. (imper fect substitut es)

2. Assume that each firm takes other s’ actions

cons tant & then se ts sales y *SR so that

MR (y *SR ) = MC (y *

SR ) (SR = Shor t Run)

to maximize its profit. This results in the short-

run price: y *SR → P *

SR .

3. In gener al, the shor t-run price > the Average

Cos t: AR (y *SR ) = P *

SR > AC (y *) for each firm, sothat profit π is positive in the short run.

< >

Page 30: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 6

In the Short RunFive points:

1. Pr ices of substitut es af fect the downwards-sloping demand curve. (imper fect substitut es)

2. Assume that each firm takes other s’ actions

cons tant & then se ts sales y *SR so that

MR (y *SR ) = MC (y *

SR ) (SR = Shor t Run)

to maximize its profit. This results in the short-

run price: y *SR → P *

SR .

3. In gener al, the shor t-run price > the Average

Cos t: AR (y *SR ) = P *

SR > AC (y *) for each firm, sothat profit π is positive in the short run.

∴ attr active for new firms to produce closesubs titut es in the long run.

< >

Page 31: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 7

Positive Profits

(The firm’s cos t and revenue curves, not the market ’s.)

$/unit

output/per iod

........................................................................................................................................................................................................

...............................

.................................................

AC

.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

MC

< >

Page 32: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 7

Positive Profits

(The firm’s cos t and revenue curves, not the market ’s.)

$/unit

output/per iod

........................................................................................................................................................................................................

...............................

.................................................

AC

.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

MC

...................................................................................................................................................................................................................

D

D = AR

< >

Page 33: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 7

Positive Profits

(The firm’s cos t and revenue curves, not the market ’s.)

$/unit

output/per iod

........................................................................................................................................................................................................

...............................

.................................................

AC

.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

MC

...................................................................................................................................................................................................................

D

D = AR

PSR

ySR

................................................... MR

< >

Page 34: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 7

Positive Profits

(The firm’s cos t and revenue curves, not the market ’s.)

$/unit

output/per iod

........................................................................................................................................................................................................

...............................

.................................................

AC

.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

MC

...................................................................................................................................................................................................................

D

D = AR

PSR

ySR

................................................... MR

.......................................................

D ′

D ′ = AR ′

< >

Page 35: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 7

Positive Profits

(The firm’s cos t and revenue curves, not the market ’s.)

$/unit

output/per iod

........................................................................................................................................................................................................

...............................

.................................................

AC

.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

MC

...................................................................................................................................................................................................................

D

D = AR

PSR

ySR

................................................... MR

.......................................................

D ′

D ′ = AR ′

P ′

y ′

.............MR ′

With demand D , the positive profit attracts newentr ants, which contracts the demand to D ′.

< >

Page 36: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 7

Positive Profits

(The firm’s cos t and revenue curves, not the market ’s.)

$/unit

output/per iod

........................................................................................................................................................................................................

...............................

.................................................

AC

.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

MC

...................................................................................................................................................................................................................

D

D = AR

PSR

ySR

................................................... MR

.......................................................

D ′

D ′ = AR ′

P ′

y ′

.............MR ′

With demand D , the positive profit attracts newentr ants, which contracts the demand to D ′.Profit falls, but still positive: AR ′(y ′) = P ′ > AC (y ′).Profit alway s maximised: MR (y ) = MC (y ).

< >

Page 37: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 8

Long-R un Equilibr ium

4.

< >

Page 38: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 8

Long-R un Equilibr ium

4. In the medium-to-long run, new entr ants invest,and the original firms ’ demand curves mov e tothe lef t, as their market share falls.

5.

< >

Page 39: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 8

Long-R un Equilibr ium

4. In the medium-to-long run, new entr ants invest,and the original firms ’ demand curves mov e tothe lef t, as their market share falls.

5. In the long run (LR), all profits will be biddedaw ay for the marginal firm, with

AR = D ≡ P = AC∴ π = 0 and output is such that the maximum(zero) profit point is on demand curve

< >

Page 40: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 8

Long-R un Equilibr ium

4. In the medium-to-long run, new entr ants invest,and the original firms ’ demand curves mov e tothe lef t, as their market share falls.

5. In the long run (LR), all profits will be biddedaw ay for the marginal firm, with

AR = D ≡ P = AC∴ π = 0 and output is such that the maximum(zero) profit point is on demand curve

∴ the demand curve D ′′ mus t be tangent to theAC cur ve at the price P ′′ & output y ′′ chosen.

& any fur ther contraction of the firm’s demand→ neg ative profits.

< >

Page 41: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 9

Zero Profits π

$/unit

output/per iod

.............................................................................................................................................................................

.......................................................................................

AC

.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

MC

yMES

< >

Page 42: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 9

Zero Profits π

$/unit

output/per iod

.............................................................................................................................................................................

.......................................................................................

AC

.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

MC

yMES

...................................................................................................................................................................................................................

D

D = AR

< >

Page 43: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 9

Zero Profits π

$/unit

output/per iod

.............................................................................................................................................................................

.......................................................................................

AC

.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

MC

yMES

...................................................................................................................................................................................................................

D

D = AR

.............................................

D ′′

D ′′ = AR ′′

< >

Page 44: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 9

Zero Profits π

$/unit

output/per iod

.............................................................................................................................................................................

.......................................................................................

AC

.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

MC

yMES

...................................................................................................................................................................................................................

D

D = AR

.............................................

D ′′

D ′′ = AR ′′P ′′

y ′′

...........MR ′′

< >

Page 45: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 9

Zero Profits π

$/unit

output/per iod

.............................................................................................................................................................................

.......................................................................................

AC

.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

MC

yMES

...................................................................................................................................................................................................................

D

D = AR

.............................................

D ′′

D ′′ = AR ′′P ′′

y ′′

...........MR ′′

Long-r un eq uilibrium at the margin.

< >

Page 46: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 9

Zero Profits π

$/unit

output/per iod

.............................................................................................................................................................................

.......................................................................................

AC

.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

MC

yMES

...................................................................................................................................................................................................................

D

D = AR

.............................................

D ′′

D ′′ = AR ′′P ′′

y ′′

...........MR ′′

Long-r un eq uilibrium at the margin.

At y ′′ , AR ′′ (y ′′ ) = P ′′ = AC (y ′′ ): zero profit, π.

< >

Page 47: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 9

Zero Profits π

$/unit

output/per iod

.............................................................................................................................................................................

.......................................................................................

AC

.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

MC

yMES

...................................................................................................................................................................................................................

D

D = AR

.............................................

D ′′

D ′′ = AR ′′P ′′

y ′′

...........MR ′′

Long-r un eq uilibrium at the margin.

At y ′′ , AR ′′ (y ′′ ) = P ′′ = AC (y ′′ ): zero profit, π.

There will be excess capacity: firms will not oper ate atthe yMES of their minimum AC , and so they couldreduce their AC by increasing output.

< >

Page 48: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 9

Zero Profits π

$/unit

output/per iod

.............................................................................................................................................................................

.......................................................................................

AC

.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

MC

yMES

...................................................................................................................................................................................................................

D

D = AR

.............................................

D ′′

D ′′ = AR ′′P ′′

y ′′

...........MR ′′

Long-r un eq uilibrium at the margin.

At y ′′ , AR ′′ (y ′′ ) = P ′′ = AC (y ′′ ): zero profit, π.

There will be excess capacity: firms will not oper ate atthe yMES of their minimum AC , and so they couldreduce their AC by increasing output. Why don’t they?

< >

Page 49: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 10

versus Per fect Competition

< >

Page 50: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 10

versus Per fect Competition

Higher average cos ts: there are zero profits, but firmsare on the downwards-sloping part of their ATC cur ves,not at yMES , the Minimum Efficient Scale.

< >

Page 51: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 10

versus Per fect Competition

Higher average cos ts: there are zero profits, but firmsare on the downwards-sloping part of their ATC cur ves,not at yMES , the Minimum Efficient Scale.

Mark-up over marginal cost: price is alway s above MC ,because the firm alw ays has some market power, not P= MC .

< >

Page 52: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 10

versus Per fect Competition

Higher average cos ts: there are zero profits, but firmsare on the downwards-sloping part of their ATC cur ves,not at yMES , the Minimum Efficient Scale.

Mark-up over marginal cost: price is alway s above MC ,because the firm alw ays has some market power, not P= MC .

No te that MC < AC , since AC is falling, not MC = AC .

< >

Page 53: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 10

versus Per fect Competition

Higher average cos ts: there are zero profits, but firmsare on the downwards-sloping part of their ATC cur ves,not at yMES , the Minimum Efficient Scale.

Mark-up over marginal cost: price is alway s above MC ,because the firm alw ays has some market power, not P= MC .

No te that MC < AC , since AC is falling, not MC = AC .

∴ Firms are alw ays eager to make another sale: an extr aunit sold at the current price means more profit, notunwilling.

< >

Page 54: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 11

And Efficiency?

In the long run, monopolistic competition is inefficient,but there is great er variety in the market.

< >

Page 55: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 11

And Efficiency?

In the long run, monopolistic competition is inefficient,but there is great er variety in the market.

Do the inefficiencies outweigh the benefits of var ietyand competition? Three inefficiencies:

1.

< >

Page 56: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 11

And Efficiency?

In the long run, monopolistic competition is inefficient,but there is great er variety in the market.

Do the inefficiencies outweigh the benefits of var ietyand competition? Three inefficiencies:

1. A Mark-up: P > MC ∴ the dead-weight lossDWL of monopol y pr icing: some consumers valuethe output above MC but below the P charged.

2.

< >

Page 57: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 11

And Efficiency?

In the long run, monopolistic competition is inefficient,but there is great er variety in the market.

Do the inefficiencies outweigh the benefits of var ietyand competition? Three inefficiencies:

1. A Mark-up: P > MC ∴ the dead-weight lossDWL of monopol y pr icing: some consumers valuethe output above MC but below the P charged.

2. Production y ′′ less than yMES , the Efficient Scaleof production at minimum AC : excess capacity.

3.

< >

Page 58: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 11

And Efficiency?

In the long run, monopolistic competition is inefficient,but there is great er variety in the market.

Do the inefficiencies outweigh the benefits of var ietyand competition? Three inefficiencies:

1. A Mark-up: P > MC ∴ the dead-weight lossDWL of monopol y pr icing: some consumers valuethe output above MC but below the P charged.

2. Production y ′′ less than yMES , the Efficient Scaleof production at minimum AC : excess capacity.

3. Too much or too little entry: the individualentr ant consider s onl y its profit,

< >

Page 59: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 11

And Efficiency?

In the long run, monopolistic competition is inefficient,but there is great er variety in the market.

Do the inefficiencies outweigh the benefits of var ietyand competition? Three inefficiencies:

1. A Mark-up: P > MC ∴ the dead-weight lossDWL of monopol y pr icing: some consumers valuethe output above MC but below the P charged.

2. Production y ′′ less than yMES , the Efficient Scaleof production at minimum AC : excess capacity.

3. Too much or too little entry: the individualentr ant consider s onl y its profit, but consumer sgain Consumer Surplus CS wit h a new product,

< >

Page 60: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 11

And Efficiency?

In the long run, monopolistic competition is inefficient,but there is great er variety in the market.

Do the inefficiencies outweigh the benefits of var ietyand competition? Three inefficiencies:

1. A Mark-up: P > MC ∴ the dead-weight lossDWL of monopol y pr icing: some consumers valuethe output above MC but below the P charged.

2. Production y ′′ less than yMES , the Efficient Scaleof production at minimum AC : excess capacity.

3. Too much or too little entry: the individualentr ant consider s onl y its profit, but consumer sgain Consumer Surplus CS wit h a new product,while incumbents lose Producer Surplus PS wit hthe new competit or. Spillover.

< >

Page 61: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 12

3. Adver tising

A natur al feature of monopolis tic competition: each firmwants more sales because of its falling AC wit h output(or P > MC).

< >

Page 62: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 12

3. Adver tising

A natur al feature of monopolis tic competition: each firmwants more sales because of its falling AC wit h output(or P > MC).

Australian media shares of adver tising (roughl y):

Pr int media: 50%Electronic media: 33%Rest : 17%

< >

Page 63: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 12

3. Adver tising

A natur al feature of monopolis tic competition: each firmwants more sales because of its falling AC wit h output(or P > MC).

Australian media shares of adver tising (roughl y):

Pr int media: 50%Electronic media: 33%Rest : 17%

Q: How does the level of adver tising vary over types ofgoods and services?

< >

Page 64: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 12

3. Adver tising

A natur al feature of monopolis tic competition: each firmwants more sales because of its falling AC wit h output(or P > MC).

Australian media shares of adver tising (roughl y):

Pr int media: 50%Electronic media: 33%Rest : 17%

Q: How does the level of adver tising vary over types ofgoods and services?

A: Highest adver tising budgets for the most highl ydif ferentiat ed consumer goods (up to 10% − 20% ofrevenues).

< >

Page 65: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 12

3. Adver tising

A natur al feature of monopolis tic competition: each firmwants more sales because of its falling AC wit h output(or P > MC).

Australian media shares of adver tising (roughl y):

Pr int media: 50%Electronic media: 33%Rest : 17%

Q: How does the level of adver tising vary over types ofgoods and services?

A: Highest adver tising budgets for the most highl ydif ferentiat ed consumer goods (up to 10% − 20% ofrevenues).

Examples?< >

Page 66: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 13

Pro & Con

< >

Page 67: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 13

Pro & Con

Manipulation of tas t es? Creating desires that other wisewouldn’t exis t?

< >

Page 68: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 13

Pro & Con

Manipulation of tas t es? Creating desires that other wisewouldn’t exis t?

Higher prices (for two reasons)?

< >

Page 69: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 13

Pro & Con

Manipulation of tas t es? Creating desires that other wisewouldn’t exis t?

Higher prices (for two reasons)? Because P > MC , and

< >

Page 70: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 13

Pro & Con

Manipulation of tas t es? Creating desires that other wisewouldn’t exis t?

Higher prices (for two reasons)? Because P > MC , andby reducing consumers’ price elasticity of demand (orbr and loyalty).

< >

Page 71: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 13

Pro & Con

Manipulation of tas t es? Creating desires that other wisewouldn’t exis t?

Higher prices (for two reasons)? Because P > MC , andby reducing consumers’ price elasticity of demand (orbr and loyalty).

or because

< >

Page 72: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 13

Pro & Con

Manipulation of tas t es? Creating desires that other wisewouldn’t exis t?

Higher prices (for two reasons)? Because P > MC , andby reducing consumers’ price elasticity of demand (orbr and loyalty).

or becauseAdvertising conve ys infor mation (pr ices, locations,exis t ence of new products) → bett er choices?

< >

Page 73: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 13

Pro & Con

Manipulation of tas t es? Creating desires that other wisewouldn’t exis t?

Higher prices (for two reasons)? Because P > MC , andby reducing consumers’ price elasticity of demand (orbr and loyalty).

or becauseAdvertising conve ys infor mation (pr ices, locations,exis t ence of new products) → bett er choices? Morecompetition, not less (think: Inter net compar isonbrow sing).

< >

Page 74: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 13

Pro & Con

Manipulation of tas t es? Creating desires that other wisewouldn’t exis t?

Higher prices (for two reasons)? Because P > MC , andby reducing consumers’ price elasticity of demand (orbr and loyalty).

or becauseAdvertising conve ys infor mation (pr ices, locations,exis t ence of new products) → bett er choices? Morecompetition, not less (think: Inter net compar isonbrow sing). Reduces brands ’ market power.

< >

Page 75: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 13

Pro & Con

Manipulation of tas t es? Creating desires that other wisewouldn’t exis t?

Higher prices (for two reasons)? Because P > MC , andby reducing consumers’ price elasticity of demand (orbr and loyalty).

or becauseAdvertising conve ys infor mation (pr ices, locations,exis t ence of new products) → bett er choices? Morecompetition, not less (think: Inter net compar isonbrow sing). Reduces brands ’ market power. Facilit atesentr y.

< >

Page 76: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 13

Pro & Con

Manipulation of tas t es? Creating desires that other wisewouldn’t exis t?

Higher prices (for two reasons)? Because P > MC , andby reducing consumers’ price elasticity of demand (orbr and loyalty).

or becauseAdvertising conve ys infor mation (pr ices, locations,exis t ence of new products) → bett er choices? Morecompetition, not less (think: Inter net compar isonbrow sing). Reduces brands ’ market power. Facilit atesentr y.

Empir ical results (p. 375):

< >

Page 77: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 13

Pro & Con

Manipulation of tas t es? Creating desires that other wisewouldn’t exis t?

Higher prices (for two reasons)? Because P > MC , andby reducing consumers’ price elasticity of demand (orbr and loyalty).

or becauseAdvertising conve ys infor mation (pr ices, locations,exis t ence of new products) → bett er choices? Morecompetition, not less (think: Inter net compar isonbrow sing). Reduces brands ’ market power. Facilit atesentr y.

Empir ical results (p. 375): Across 50 U,S. states: thepr ice of spectacles was 20% lower when adver tisingallowed.

< >

Page 78: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 14

As a Signal of Quality

< >

Page 79: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 14

As a Signal of Quality

How much infor mation?

< >

Page 80: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 14

As a Signal of Quality

How much infor mation?

Is the firm’s willingness to buy adver tising (especiall yfor repeat-purchase, exper ience goods) a signal of theproduct ’s quality?

< >

Page 81: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 14

As a Signal of Quality

How much infor mation?

Is the firm’s willingness to buy adver tising (especiall yfor repeat-purchase, exper ience goods) a signal of theproduct ’s quality?

Is what the adver t says impor tant?

< >

Page 82: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 14

As a Signal of Quality

How much infor mation?

Is the firm’s willingness to buy adver tising (especiall yfor repeat-purchase, exper ience goods) a signal of theproduct ’s quality?

Is what the adver t says impor tant?No t much when signalling quality — just that it isexpensive and paid for.

< >

Page 83: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 14

As a Signal of Quality

How much infor mation?

Is the firm’s willingness to buy adver tising (especiall yfor repeat-purchase, exper ience goods) a signal of theproduct ’s quality?

Is what the adver t says impor tant?No t much when signalling quality — just that it isexpensive and paid for.

e.g. breakfas t cereals

< >

Page 84: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 15

Br and Names

Economics of brand names:

< >

Page 85: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 15

Br and Names

Economics of brand names:

Perceived differences, not real — a rip-of f, fromadver tising.

< >

Page 86: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 15

Br and Names

Economics of brand names:

Perceived differences, not real — a rip-of f, fromadver tising.

but :Quality — firms use brands to conve y signals aboutquality; and, firms must defend their brands ’ reput ations(or brand equity) as high-quality products bymaint aining quality.

< >

Page 87: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 15

Br and Names

Economics of brand names:

Perceived differences, not real — a rip-of f, fromadver tising.

but :Quality — firms use brands to conve y signals aboutquality; and, firms must defend their brands ’ reput ations(or brand equity) as high-quality products bymaint aining quality.e.g. fas t-food franchises

< >

Page 88: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 15

Br and Names

Economics of brand names:

Perceived differences, not real — a rip-of f, fromadver tising.

but :Quality — firms use brands to conve y signals aboutquality; and, firms must defend their brands ’ reput ations(or brand equity) as high-quality products bymaint aining quality.e.g. fas t-food franchises

Rationality : ir rational preference for brand names, or

< >

Page 89: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 15

Br and Names

Economics of brand names:

Perceived differences, not real — a rip-of f, fromadver tising.

but :Quality — firms use brands to conve y signals aboutquality; and, firms must defend their brands ’ reput ations(or brand equity) as high-quality products bymaint aining quality.e.g. fas t-food franchises

Rationality : ir rational preference for brand names, or forgood reason?

< >

Page 90: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 16

Summar y

1. Between monopoly and perfect competition liemos t markets: oligopolies (few seller s) ormonopolis tic competition (many seller s).

2. Monopolistic Competition: Neit her per fectcompetition, nor pure monopol y: many seller sand zero profit, but with a price mark-up:P > MC .

3. Many products → variety for consumers!

4. Adver tising to increase sales. Jus tified or not?

< >

Page 91: Monopolis tic Competition -  · PDF fileMonopolis tic Competition: ... Dif f er entiat ed Monopol y Dif f er entiat ed Monopolis tic oductPr Oligopol y Compe tition

May 1 U N S W © 2008 Page 17

Appendix

Under what conditions is it true that the slope dMRdQ

of

the MR cur ve is twice that dPdQ

of the AR (i.e demand)cur ve?

Now revenue R = Q •P (Q)

∴ MR ≡ dRdQ

= P (Q) + Q dPdQ

= P•(1 + 1η

),

where η is the price elasticity of demand.

∴ The slope of the MR cur ve is given by:dMRdQ

= 2 dPdQ

+ Q d 2PdQ2

So it is only true in gener al for linear demand curves, for

which d 2PdQ2 = d

dQ( dP

dQ) = 0, because their slopes are

cons tant (but not, of course, their elasticities).

<


Recommended