+ All Categories
Home > Documents > MTO EMPIRICAL PAVEMENT DESIGN The following presentation contains references to Tables 6.02 and...

MTO EMPIRICAL PAVEMENT DESIGN The following presentation contains references to Tables 6.02 and...

Date post: 16-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: randell-park
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
12
MTO EMPIRICAL MTO EMPIRICAL PAVEMENT DESIGN PAVEMENT DESIGN The following presentation contains references to The following presentation contains references to Tables 6.02 Tables 6.02 and and 6.03 6.03 , and “ , and “ MTO Empirical Design Examples MTO Empirical Design Examples ”, all of which ”, all of which are posted under subsection 2.6 of the course notes on the are posted under subsection 2.6 of the course notes on the instructor’s website. Viewer discretion is advised as some instructor’s website. Viewer discretion is advised as some scenes contain material of a tabular nature. scenes contain material of a tabular nature.
Transcript
Page 1: MTO EMPIRICAL PAVEMENT DESIGN The following presentation contains references to Tables 6.02 and 6.03, and “MTO Empirical Design Examples”, all of which.

MTO EMPIRICAL MTO EMPIRICAL PAVEMENT PAVEMENT

DESIGNDESIGN

The following presentation contains references to The following presentation contains references to Tables 6.02Tables 6.02 and and 6.036.03, and “, and “MTO Empirical Design MTO Empirical Design ExamplesExamples”, all of which are posted under ”, all of which are posted under subsection 2.6 of the course notes on the subsection 2.6 of the course notes on the instructor’s website. Viewer discretion is advised instructor’s website. Viewer discretion is advised as some scenes contain material of a tabular as some scenes contain material of a tabular nature.nature.

Page 2: MTO EMPIRICAL PAVEMENT DESIGN The following presentation contains references to Tables 6.02 and 6.03, and “MTO Empirical Design Examples”, all of which.

Gravels

Range of Pavement and Sands Lacustrine Varved &

AADT Structure Suitable as Clays Leda Clays

Elements Gran. Borrow <40% 40 - 55% >55%

HM 130 130 130 130 130 130

> 4000 B 150 - 250 150 150 150 150 150

SB --- 300 - 450 450 - 600 600 - 800 450 450 - 1100

GBE 410 - 510 610 - 710 710 - 810 810 - 945 710 710 - 1145

HM 120 - 130 120 - 130 120 - 130 120 - 130 120 - 130 120 - 130

3000 - B 150 - 250 150 150 150 150 150

4000 SB --- 300 - 450 450 - 600 600 - 800 450 450 - 1100

GBE 390 - 510 590 - 710 690 - 810 790 - 945 690 - 710 690 - 1145

HM 90 90 90 90 90 90

2000 - B 150 150 150 150 150 150

3000 SB** --- 300 450 600 450 800

GBE 330 530 630 730 630 865

HM 50 50 50 50 50 50

1000 - B 150 150 150 150 150 150

2000 SB** --- 250 300 450 300 450 (300 - 600)

GBE 250 415 450 550 450 550 (450 - 650)

HM 50 50 50 50 50 50

200 - B 150 150 150 150 150 150

1000 SB** --- 150 250 300 250 300 (250 - 450)

GBE 250 350 415 450 415 450 (415 - 550)

Notes: All AADT Volumes ref er to Present Traffi c

HM: Hot Mix Asphalt & Thickness (mm)

B: Base Thickness (mm)

SB: Subbase Thickness (mm)

GBE: Equivalent Thickness of Granular Base (mm)

( 1 mm HM = 2 mm B = 3 mm SB )

**: Proposed subbase thicknesses may be decreased or increased respectively

f or harder or sof ter subgrade conditions in each category, except f or

varved & leda clay subgrades where exceptionally large ranges are shown

(Af ter: "Pavement Design and Rehabilitation Manual", 1990)

SANDS AND SI LTS

Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve

TABLE 6.03 a

STRUCTURAL DESI GN GUI DELI NES FOR FLEXI BLE PAVEMENTS

- KI NG'S HI GHWAYS AND FREEWAYS

Subgrade Material

Gravels

Range of Pavement and Sands Lacustrine Varved &

AADT Structure Suitable as Clays Leda Clays

Elements Gran. Borrow <40% 40 - 55% >55%

HM 90 90 90 90 90 90

2000 - B 150 150 150 150 150 150

3000 SB** --- 300 450 600 450 800

GBE 330 530 630 730 630 865

HM 50 50 50 50 50 50

1500 - B 150 150 150 150 150 150

2000 SB** --- 250 300 450 300 450(300 - 600)

GBE 250 415 450 550 450 550 (450 - 650)

CL 50 50 50 50 50 50

1000 - B 150 150 150 150 150 150

1500 SB** --- 250 300 450 300 450 (300 - 600)

GBE 240 405 440 540 450 540 (450 - 640)

ST* --- --- --- --- --- ---

500 - B 150 150 150 150 150 150

1000 SB** --- 150 250 300 250 350 (250 - 450)

GBE 150 250 315 350 315 385 (315 - 450)

ST* --- --- --- --- --- ---

200 - B 150 150 150 150 150 150

500 SB** --- 150 250 300 250 300

GBE 150 250 315 350 315 350

Gravel --- --- --- --- --- ---

< 200 B 100 100 100 100 100 100

SB** --- 150 250 300 250 300

GBE 100 200 265 300 265 300

Notes: All AADT Volumes ref er to Present Traffi c

HM: Hot Mix Asphalt & Thickness (mm)

B: Base Thickness (mm)

SB: Subbase Thickness (mm)

GBE: Equivalent Thickness of Granular Base (mm)

( 1 mm HM = 2 mm B = 3 mm SB = 1.11 mm CL)

CL: Cold Mixed, Cold Laid or Road Mixed Mulch

ST: Double Surf ace Treatment or Single Surf ace Treatment with Prime

*: Apply surf ace treatments 0.25 m wider that lane width

**: Proposed subbase thicknesses may be decreased or increased respectively

TABLE 6.03 b

STRUCTURAL DESI GN GUI DELI NES FOR FLEXI BLE PAVEMENTS

- SECONDARY HI GHWAYS(Af ter: "Pavement Design and Rehabilitation Manual", 1990)

Subgrade Material

SANDS AND SI LTS

Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve

ANY QUESTIONS?ANY QUESTIONS?

Page 3: MTO EMPIRICAL PAVEMENT DESIGN The following presentation contains references to Tables 6.02 and 6.03, and “MTO Empirical Design Examples”, all of which.

There are?There are?OK, well here’s a little more…OK, well here’s a little more…

You may have noticed that there were You may have noticed that there were two design charts:two design charts:

a)a) The first is for “Kings” Highways and ExpresswaysThe first is for “Kings” Highways and Expressways

b)b) The second is for secondary highwaysThe second is for secondary highways

Gravels

Range of Pavement and Sands Lacustrine Varved &

AADT Structure Suitable as Clays Leda Clays

Elements Gran. Borrow <40% 40 - 55% >55%

HM 130 130 130 130 130 130

> 4000 B 150 - 250 150 150 150 150 150

SB --- 300 - 450 450 - 600 600 - 800 450 450 - 1100

GBE 410 - 510 610 - 710 710 - 810 810 - 945 710 710 - 1145

HM 120 - 130 120 - 130 120 - 130 120 - 130 120 - 130 120 - 130

3000 - B 150 - 250 150 150 150 150 150

4000 SB --- 300 - 450 450 - 600 600 - 800 450 450 - 1100

GBE 390 - 510 590 - 710 690 - 810 790 - 945 690 - 710 690 - 1145

HM 90 90 90 90 90 90

2000 - B 150 150 150 150 150 150

3000 SB** --- 300 450 600 450 800

GBE 330 530 630 730 630 865

HM 50 50 50 50 50 50

1000 - B 150 150 150 150 150 150

2000 SB** --- 250 300 450 300 450 (300 - 600)

GBE 250 415 450 550 450 550 (450 - 650)

HM 50 50 50 50 50 50

200 - B 150 150 150 150 150 150

1000 SB** --- 150 250 300 250 300 (250 - 450)

GBE 250 350 415 450 415 450 (415 - 550)

Notes: All AADT Volumes ref er to Present Traffi c

HM: Hot Mix Asphalt & Thickness (mm)

B: Base Thickness (mm)

SB: Subbase Thickness (mm)

GBE: Equivalent Thickness of Granular Base (mm)

( 1 mm HM = 2 mm B = 3 mm SB )

**: Proposed subbase thicknesses may be decreased or increased respectively

f or harder or sof ter subgrade conditions in each category, except f or

varved & leda clay subgrades where exceptionally large ranges are shown

(Af ter: "Pavement Design and Rehabilitation Manual", 1990)

SANDS AND SI LTS

Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve

TABLE 6.03 a

STRUCTURAL DESI GN GUI DELI NES FOR FLEXI BLE PAVEMENTS

- KI NG'S HI GHWAYS AND FREEWAYS

Subgrade Material

So, a) has 5 levels (rows) of traffic (AADT) So, a) has 5 levels (rows) of traffic (AADT) which are different than the 6 for b)which are different than the 6 for b)

The 6 columns for different subgrade types The 6 columns for different subgrade types are the same for bothare the same for both

Each cell has a conventional pavement designEach cell has a conventional pavement design

Gravels

Range of Pavement and Sands Lacustrine Varved &

AADT Structure Suitable as Clays Leda Clays

Elements Gran. Borrow <40% 40 - 55% >55%

HM 90 90 90 90 90 90

2000 - B 150 150 150 150 150 150

3000 SB** --- 300 450 600 450 800

GBE 330 530 630 730 630 865

HM 50 50 50 50 50 50

1500 - B 150 150 150 150 150 150

2000 SB** --- 250 300 450 300 450(300 - 600)

GBE 250 415 450 550 450 550 (450 - 650)

CL 50 50 50 50 50 50

1000 - B 150 150 150 150 150 150

1500 SB** --- 250 300 450 300 450 (300 - 600)

GBE 240 405 440 540 450 540 (450 - 640)

ST* --- --- --- --- --- ---

500 - B 150 150 150 150 150 150

1000 SB** --- 150 250 300 250 350 (250 - 450)

GBE 150 250 315 350 315 385 (315 - 450)

ST* --- --- --- --- --- ---

200 - B 150 150 150 150 150 150

500 SB** --- 150 250 300 250 300

GBE 150 250 315 350 315 350

Gravel --- --- --- --- --- ---

< 200 B 100 100 100 100 100 100

SB** --- 150 250 300 250 300

GBE 100 200 265 300 265 300

Notes: All AADT Volumes ref er to Present Traffi c

HM: Hot Mix Asphalt & Thickness (mm)

B: Base Thickness (mm)

SB: Subbase Thickness (mm)

GBE: Equivalent Thickness of Granular Base (mm)

( 1 mm HM = 2 mm B = 3 mm SB = 1.11 mm CL)

CL: Cold Mixed, Cold Laid or Road Mixed Mulch

ST: Double Surf ace Treatment or Single Surf ace Treatment with Prime

*: Apply surf ace treatments 0.25 m wider that lane width

**: Proposed subbase thicknesses may be decreased or increased respectively

TABLE 6.03 b

STRUCTURAL DESI GN GUI DELI NES FOR FLEXI BLE PAVEMENTS

- SECONDARY HI GHWAYS(Af ter: "Pavement Design and Rehabilitation Manual", 1990)

Subgrade Material

SANDS AND SI LTS

Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve

AADT>200 vpd

Subgrades range from:STRONGEST

to weakest

AADT<3000 vpd

Same old Same old subgradesubgradess

Page 4: MTO EMPIRICAL PAVEMENT DESIGN The following presentation contains references to Tables 6.02 and 6.03, and “MTO Empirical Design Examples”, all of which.

Example Example 11

A 2-lane county road is expected to have A 2-lane county road is expected to have an initial AADT of an initial AADT of 1750 vpd1750 vpd and is to and is to built over a built over a silty sandsilty sand subgrade with subgrade with 30%30% Passing the No. 200 sieve. Passing the No. 200 sieve.

a)a) Determine a conventional flexible Determine a conventional flexible pavement design.pavement design.

b)b) A couple of subsections require the use A couple of subsections require the use of a deep strength design using cement of a deep strength design using cement treated base and no subbase. Give the treated base and no subbase. Give the appropriate layer thicknesses.appropriate layer thicknesses.

Page 5: MTO EMPIRICAL PAVEMENT DESIGN The following presentation contains references to Tables 6.02 and 6.03, and “MTO Empirical Design Examples”, all of which.

• for AADT of 1750 for AADT of 1750 use second rowuse second row

• for silty sand with for silty sand with 30% passing no. 30% passing no. 200 use second 200 use second columncolumn

• And the winning And the winning design is:design is:

HM: 50 mmHM: 50 mm B: 150 mmB: 150 mm SB: 250 mmSB: 250 mmGBE: 415 mmGBE: 415 mm

Gravels

Range of Pavement and Sands Lacustrine Varved &

AADT Structure Suitable as Clays Leda Clays

Elements Gran. Borrow <40% 40 - 55% >55%

HM 90 90 90 90 90 90

2000 - B 150 150 150 150 150 150

3000 SB** --- 300 450 600 450 800

GBE 330 530 630 730 630 865

HM 50 50 50 50 50 50

1500 - B 150 150 150 150 150 150

2000 SB** --- 250 300 450 300 450(300 - 600)

GBE 250 415 450 550 450 550 (450 - 650)

CL 50 50 50 50 50 50

1000 - B 150 150 150 150 150 150

1500 SB** --- 250 300 450 300 450 (300 - 600)

GBE 240 405 440 540 450 540 (450 - 640)

ST* --- --- --- --- --- ---

500 - B 150 150 150 150 150 150

1000 SB** --- 150 250 300 250 350 (250 - 450)

GBE 150 250 315 350 315 385 (315 - 450)

ST* --- --- --- --- --- ---

200 - B 150 150 150 150 150 150

500 SB** --- 150 250 300 250 300

GBE 150 250 315 350 315 350

Gravel --- --- --- --- --- ---

< 200 B 100 100 100 100 100 100

SB** --- 150 250 300 250 300

GBE 100 200 265 300 265 300

Notes: All AADT Volumes ref er to Present Traffi c

HM: Hot Mix Asphalt & Thickness (mm)

B: Base Thickness (mm)

SB: Subbase Thickness (mm)

GBE: Equivalent Thickness of Granular Base (mm)

( 1 mm HM = 2 mm B = 3 mm SB = 1.11 mm CL)

CL: Cold Mixed, Cold Laid or Road Mixed Mulch

ST: Double Surf ace Treatment or Single Surf ace Treatment with Prime

*: Apply surf ace treatments 0.25 m wider that lane width

**: Proposed subbase thicknesses may be decreased or increased respectively

TABLE 6.03 b

STRUCTURAL DESI GN GUI DELI NES FOR FLEXI BLE PAVEMENTS

- SECONDARY HI GHWAYS(Af ter: "Pavement Design and Rehabilitation Manual", 1990)

Subgrade Material

SANDS AND SI LTS

Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve

For a county road with For a county road with an AADT of 1750 vpd, an AADT of 1750 vpd, try Table 6.03btry Table 6.03b

Page 6: MTO EMPIRICAL PAVEMENT DESIGN The following presentation contains references to Tables 6.02 and 6.03, and “MTO Empirical Design Examples”, all of which.

LayerLayerLayer Layer

Thickness Thickness (mm)(mm)

Hot MixHot Mix 5050

BaseBase 150150

SubbaseSubbase 250250

EquivalencEquivalency Factory Factor

2.002.00

1.001.00

0.670.67

100100

150150

Granular Granular Base Base

Equivalency Equivalency

(mm)(mm)

167.5167.5

Total Granular Base Equivalency Total Granular Base Equivalency (mm):(mm):

417.5417.5

Lets Lets calculate calculate the the GBEGBE for this for this design:design:

The tabulated GBE was The tabulated GBE was 415415..

The tabulated GBE’s have been rounded The tabulated GBE’s have been rounded to the nearest 5 mm.to the nearest 5 mm.

Now on to part b)Now on to part b)

Page 7: MTO EMPIRICAL PAVEMENT DESIGN The following presentation contains references to Tables 6.02 and 6.03, and “MTO Empirical Design Examples”, all of which.

Example 1 Example 1 b)b)

Part b) calls for a deep Part b) calls for a deep strength designstrength design

This would require This would require that the base and that the base and subbase be replaced subbase be replaced by a cement treated by a cement treated base layer base layer (CTB)(CTB)

The strength of the The strength of the base and subbase is base and subbase is 150150 + + 167.5167.5 = = 317.5317.5 mm of new Granular Amm of new Granular A

The Equivalency The Equivalency Factor for CTB is…Factor for CTB is…

Note: For design purposes OFC and Surface Treatment, because of their thickness, are assumed to have no structural value and

TABLE 6.02

GRANULAR BASE EQUI VALENCY FACTORS(Af ter: "Pavement Design and Rehabilitation Manual", 1990)

NEW PROJ ECTSEquivalency

Material Factor

New or Recycled HL 2.00Granular A in Base 1.00

Granular B in Subbase 0.67Cement Treated Material in Subbase (with Gr. A base) 1.40

Cement Treated Material in Base (no subbase) 1.80Bituminous Treated Material in Base (with Gr. A subbase) 1.50

Cold Mix 1.80OGDL (Open Graded Drainage Layer) 1.00

RESURFACI NG PROJ ECTSEquivalency

Material Factor

Crushed RBM* (in base) 1.00Bituminous Treated Crushed RBM* 1.50

Crushed RBM* Blended with New Granular A 1.00Pulverized Bituminous Surface Mixed with Existing Base 1.00

Old HL 1.25Old Granular Base 0.75

Old Granular Subbase 0.50

RECONSTRUCTI ON PROJ ECTSEquivalency

Material Factor

Granular A Layer 1.00Old HL 1.00

Old Granular Base 0.60Old Granular Subbase 0.40

1.801.80

Page 8: MTO EMPIRICAL PAVEMENT DESIGN The following presentation contains references to Tables 6.02 and 6.03, and “MTO Empirical Design Examples”, all of which.

If the required thickness of CTB isIf the required thickness of CTB is TTCTBCTB, , then the GBE of the CTB is then the GBE of the CTB is 1.80T1.80TCTBCTB == 317.5 mm317.5 mm

Solving,Solving, TTCTBCTB == ≈≈ So the deep strength design would be:So the deep strength design would be:

LayerLayer Layer Thickness Layer Thickness (mm)(mm)

Hot MixHot Mix 5050

CTBCTB 180180

Example 1 Example 1 b)b)

176.4176.4

180 180 mmmm

EquivalencEquivalency Factory Factor

2.002.00

1.801.80

Granular Base Granular Base Equivalency Equivalency

(mm)(mm)

100100

324324

Total Granular Base Equivalency Total Granular Base Equivalency (mm):(mm):

424424

Page 9: MTO EMPIRICAL PAVEMENT DESIGN The following presentation contains references to Tables 6.02 and 6.03, and “MTO Empirical Design Examples”, all of which.

Example Example 22

A 12 km stretch of Highway 99 has A 12 km stretch of Highway 99 has 75 mm75 mm of of hot mixhot mix over over 180 mm180 mm of of granular granular basebase over over 300 mm300 mm of of granular subbasegranular subbase. . If the If the AADTAADT has grown to has grown to 2500 vpd2500 vpd, , the the sandy subgradesandy subgrade has has 22% passing 22% passing the No. 200 sievethe No. 200 sieve and the and the hot mix has hot mix has lost 65% of its strengthlost 65% of its strength, , what minimum what minimum thickness of hot mix overlay will restore thickness of hot mix overlay will restore the pavement to its required strength?the pavement to its required strength?

Page 10: MTO EMPIRICAL PAVEMENT DESIGN The following presentation contains references to Tables 6.02 and 6.03, and “MTO Empirical Design Examples”, all of which.

• for AADT of 2500 for AADT of 2500 use third rowuse third row

• for silty sand with for silty sand with 22% passing no. 22% passing no. 200 use second 200 use second columncolumn

• The required design The required design is:is:

HM: 90 mmHM: 90 mm B: 150 mmB: 150 mm SB: 300 mmSB: 300 mmGBE: 530 mmGBE: 530 mm

For a highway with an For a highway with an AADT of 2500 vpd, try AADT of 2500 vpd, try Table 6.03aTable 6.03a Gravels

Range of Pavement and Sands Lacustrine Varved &

AADT Structure Suitable as Clays Leda Clays

Elements Gran. Borrow <40% 40 - 55% >55%

HM 130 130 130 130 130 130

> 4000 B 150 - 250 150 150 150 150 150

SB --- 300 - 450 450 - 600 600 - 800 450 450 - 1100

GBE 410 - 510 610 - 710 710 - 810 810 - 945 710 710 - 1145

HM 120 - 130 120 - 130 120 - 130 120 - 130 120 - 130 120 - 130

3000 - B 150 - 250 150 150 150 150 150

4000 SB --- 300 - 450 450 - 600 600 - 800 450 450 - 1100

GBE 390 - 510 590 - 710 690 - 810 790 - 945 690 - 710 690 - 1145

HM 90 90 90 90 90 90

2000 - B 150 150 150 150 150 150

3000 SB** --- 300 450 600 450 800

GBE 330 530 630 730 630 865

HM 50 50 50 50 50 50

1000 - B 150 150 150 150 150 150

2000 SB** --- 250 300 450 300 450 (300 - 600)

GBE 250 415 450 550 450 550 (450 - 650)

HM 50 50 50 50 50 50

200 - B 150 150 150 150 150 150

1000 SB** --- 150 250 300 250 300 (250 - 450)

GBE 250 350 415 450 415 450 (415 - 550)

Notes: All AADT Volumes ref er to Present Traffi c

HM: Hot Mix Asphalt & Thickness (mm)

B: Base Thickness (mm)

SB: Subbase Thickness (mm)

GBE: Equivalent Thickness of Granular Base (mm)

( 1 mm HM = 2 mm B = 3 mm SB )

**: Proposed subbase thicknesses may be decreased or increased respectively

f or harder or sof ter subgrade conditions in each category, except f or

varved & leda clay subgrades where exceptionally large ranges are shown

(Af ter: "Pavement Design and Rehabilitation Manual", 1990)

SANDS AND SI LTS

Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve

TABLE 6.03 a

STRUCTURAL DESI GN GUI DELI NES FOR FLEXI BLE PAVEMENTS

- KI NG'S HI GHWAYS AND FREEWAYS

Subgrade Material

Page 11: MTO EMPIRICAL PAVEMENT DESIGN The following presentation contains references to Tables 6.02 and 6.03, and “MTO Empirical Design Examples”, all of which.

LayerLayerLayer Layer

Thickness Thickness (mm)(mm)

Hot MixHot Mix 9090

BaseBase 150150

SubbaseSubbase 300300

EquivalencEquivalency Factory Factor

2.002.00

1.001.00

0.670.67

180180

150150

Granular Granular Base Base

Equivalency Equivalency

(mm)(mm)

201201

Total Granular Base Equivalency Total Granular Base Equivalency (mm):(mm):

531531

TheThe recommendrecommendeded design:design:

LayerLayerLayer Layer

Thickness Thickness (mm)(mm)

Hot MixHot Mix 7575

BaseBase 180180

SubbaseSubbase 300300

EquivalencEquivalency Factory Factor

101.25101.25

135135

Granular Granular Base Base

Equivalency Equivalency

(mm)(mm)

150150

Existing GBE Existing GBE (mm):(mm):

386.25386.25

TheThe existingexisting design:design:

EF of HM = EF of HM = 22-(-(22--11)*)*0.650.65 ==1.351.35

65% of HM 65% of HM strength strength lostlost

Note: For design purposes OFC and Surface Treatment, because of their thickness, are assumed to have no structural value and

TABLE 6.02

GRANULAR BASE EQUI VALENCY FACTORS(Af ter: "Pavement Design and Rehabilitation Manual", 1990)

NEW PROJ ECTSEquivalency

Material Factor

New or Recycled HL 2.00Granular A in Base 1.00

Granular B in Subbase 0.67Cement Treated Material in Subbase (with Gr. A base) 1.40

Cement Treated Material in Base (no subbase) 1.80Bituminous Treated Material in Base (with Gr. A subbase) 1.50

Cold Mix 1.80OGDL (Open Graded Drainage Layer) 1.00

RESURFACI NG PROJ ECTSEquivalency

Material Factor

Crushed RBM* (in base) 1.00Bituminous Treated Crushed RBM* 1.50

Crushed RBM* Blended with New Granular A 1.00Pulverized Bituminous Surface Mixed with Existing Base 1.00

Old HL 1.25Old Granular Base 0.75

Old Granular Subbase 0.50

RECONSTRUCTI ON PROJ ECTSEquivalency

Material Factor

Granular A Layer 1.00Old HL 1.00

Old Granular Base 0.60Old Granular Subbase 0.40

1.351.35

0.750.75

0.500.50

Page 12: MTO EMPIRICAL PAVEMENT DESIGN The following presentation contains references to Tables 6.02 and 6.03, and “MTO Empirical Design Examples”, all of which.

Example Example 22

Extra Strength Extra Strength Required =Required =531531 – – 386.25 =386.25 =144.75 mm144.75 mm of new Granular A of new Granular A

Since overlay will be with new Hot Mix, Since overlay will be with new Hot Mix, only only halfhalf of this thickness of new hot mix will be of this thickness of new hot mix will be needed.needed.Overlay Thickness Overlay Thickness Required =Required =144.75144.75/2/2 == 72.37572.375 ≈≈ 80 mm80 mm of new Hot of new Hot MixMix


Recommended