+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts - independent tests -...

Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts - independent tests -...

Date post: 15-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: harmony-mollet
View: 217 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
22
Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts - independent tests - labelling conventions
Transcript
Page 1: Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts - independent tests - labelling conventions.

Multiple comparisons

- multiple pairwise tests

- orthogonal contrasts

- independent tests

- labelling conventions

Page 2: Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts - independent tests - labelling conventions.

Card example number 1

Page 3: Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts - independent tests - labelling conventions.

Multiple tests

Problem:

Because we examine the same data in multiple comparisons, the result of the first comparison affects our expectation of the next comparison.

Page 4: Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts - independent tests - labelling conventions.

Multiple tests

ANOVA shows at least one different, but which one(s)?

significant

Not significant

significant

•T-tests of all pairwise combinations

Page 5: Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts - independent tests - labelling conventions.

Multiple tests

T-test: <5% chance that this difference was a fluke…

affects likelihood of finding a difference in this pair!

Page 6: Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts - independent tests - labelling conventions.

Multiple tests

Solution:Make alpha your overall “experiment-wise” error rate

affects likelihood (alpha) of finding a difference in this pair!

T-test: <5% chance that this difference was a fluke…

Page 7: Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts - independent tests - labelling conventions.

Multiple tests

Solution:Make alpha your overall “experiment-wise” error rate

e.g. simple Bonferroni:Divide alpha by number of tests

Alpha / 3 = 0.0167

Alpha / 3 =0.0167

Alpha / 3 = 0.0167

Page 8: Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts - independent tests - labelling conventions.

Card example 2

Page 9: Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts - independent tests - labelling conventions.

Orthogonal contrastsOrthogonal = perpendicular = independent

Contrast = comparison

Example. We compare the growth of three types of plants: Legumes, graminoids, and asters.

These 2 contrasts are orthogonal:

1. Legumes vs. non-legumes (graminoids, asters) 2. Graminoids vs. asters

Page 10: Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts - independent tests - labelling conventions.

Trick for determining if contrasts are orthogonal:

1. In the first contrast, label all treatments in one group with “+” and all treatments in the other group with “-” (doesn’t matter which way round).

Legumes Graminoids Asters + - -

Page 11: Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts - independent tests - labelling conventions.

Trick for determining if contrasts are orthogonal:

1. In the first contrast, label all treatments in one group with “+” and all treatments in the other group with “-” (doesn’t matter which way round).

2. In each group composed of t treatments, put the number 1/t as the coefficient. If treatment not in contrast, give it the value “0”.

Legumes Graminoids Asters +1 - 1/2 -1/2

Page 12: Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts - independent tests - labelling conventions.

Trick for determining if contrasts are orthogonal:

1. In the first contrast, label all treatments in one group with “+” and all treatments in the other group with “-” (doesn’t matter which way round).

2. In each group composed of t treatments, put the number 1/t as the coefficient. If treatment not in contrast, give it the value “0”.

3. Repeat for all other contrasts.

Legumes Graminoids Asters +1 - 1/2 -1/2 0 +1 -1

Page 13: Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts - independent tests - labelling conventions.

Trick for determining if contrasts are orthogonal:

4. Multiply each column, then sum these products.

Legumes Graminoids Asters +1 - 1/2 -1/2 0 +1 -1

0 - 1/2 +1/2

Sum of products = 0

Page 14: Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts - independent tests - labelling conventions.

Trick for determining if contrasts are orthogonal:

4. Multiply each column, then sum these products.

5. If this sum = 0 then the contrasts were orthogonal!

Legumes Graminoids Asters +1 - 1/2 -1/2 0 +1 -1

0 - 1/2 +1/2

Sum of products = 0

Page 15: Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts - independent tests - labelling conventions.

What about these contrasts?

1. Monocots (graminoids) vs. dicots (legumes and asters).

2. Legumes vs. non-legumes

Page 16: Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts - independent tests - labelling conventions.

Important!

You need to assess orthogonality in each pairwise combination of contrasts.

So if 4 contrasts:

Contrast 1 and 2, 1 and 3, 1 and 4, 2 and 3, 2 and 4, 3 and 4.

Page 17: Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts - independent tests - labelling conventions.

How do you program contrasts in JMP (etc.)?

Treatment SS

}Contrast 2

}Contrast 1

Page 18: Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts - independent tests - labelling conventions.

How do you program contrasts in JMP (etc.)?

Normal treatments

Legume 1 1Legume 1 1Graminoid 2 2Graminoid 2 2Aster 3 2Aster 3 2

SStreat 122 67Df treat 2 1MStreat 60

MSerror 10Df error 20

Legumesvs. non-legumes “There was a significant

treatment effect (F…). About 53% of the variation between treatments was due to differences between legumes and non-legumes (F1,20 = 6.7).”

F1,20 = (67)/1 = 6.7 10

From full model!

Page 19: Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts - independent tests - labelling conventions.

Even different statistical tests may not be independent !

Example. We examined effects of fertilizer on growth of dandelions in a pasture using an ANOVA. We then repeated the test for growth of grass in the same plots.

Problem?

Page 20: Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts - independent tests - labelling conventions.

Multiple tests

Not significantsignificant

Not significant

a a,b

bConvention:Treatments with a common letter are not significantly different

Page 21: Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts - independent tests - labelling conventions.
Page 22: Multiple comparisons - multiple pairwise tests - orthogonal contrasts - independent tests - labelling conventions.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Farm fa

llow

Ebouf

ek co

mplete

Ebogo

comple

te

Ebogo

mec

hanic

al

Ebogo

man

ual

Ebouf

ek un

clear

ed

Ebogo

uncle

ared

Bilik u

nclea

red

Mea

n no

. but

terf

lies/

5 m

in.w

alk

a a

abbc bc

dd

cd


Recommended