PAVEMENT CONDITION PERFORMANCE ON CRUMB RUBBER ROAD IN
KUALA KRAI, KELANTAN
NAZIRUL MUBIN BIN ZUKIRNAINI
A project report submitted in partial fulfilment of the
requirements for the award of the degree of
Master of Engineering (Civil)
School of Civil Engineering
Faculty of Engineering
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
SEPTEMBER 2020
iv
DEDICATION
This work is dedicated to the sincerest,
Loving and caring parents,
My beloved Father and Mother,
Zukirnaini Bin Mustapha,
Wan Nazila Binti Wan Ahmed,
My beloved Father and Mother in law,
Saadi Bin Che Ismail,
Hasnah Binti Mohd Nor,
And my supportive wife,
Siti Sahirah Binti Saadi.
All my dear children,
Nafeesha Inara, Naila Irdina and Niyaz Iskandar.
Hopefully these efforts given consideration and rewarded by Allah.
As the Prophet Muhammad S.A.W said:
“Whoever follows a path to seek knowledge,
Allah will make the path to Jannah (Paradise) easy for them.”
(Shahih Muslim)
v
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First and above all, I praise Allah, the almighty for providing me this
opportunity and granting me the capability to proceed successfully. In preparing this
thesis, I was in contact with many people and my fellow friends. They have contributed
towards my understanding and thoughts.
In particular, I wish to express my sincere appreciation to my project supervisor
“Pensyarah Kanan” Ts. Dr. Haryati Yaacob and ex-supervisor Prof. Ts. Dr. Mohd
Rosli Hainin for unlimited guidance from the start to the completion of this study,
encouragement, cooperation, advice and friendship. Without their continued support
and interest, this thesis would not have been the same as presented here.
I am also thankful to Ir. Raja Rusdy Irwan Bin Raja Hussien and Mohd Asrul
Farizul Bin Ab Adzi, District Engineer of Jabatan Kerja Raya Tumpat. Besides that,
thanks to Muhd Mazwan Bin Kamarudin, Engineer Assistant of JKR Kuala Krai and
Bukit Buloh Quarry for help me give more imformation to complete my project. Not
to forget, Zainal Zulkifli Bin Mohamad Noor, QAQC Executive Regional and Nik
Ahmad Hilmi Nik Mustapha, Area Manager of Roadcare Sdn. Bhd for their
cooperation and experience shared.
My sincere appreciation also extends to all my colleagues and others who
provide assistance and support at various occasions. Their views and tips are useful
indeed. Finally, I would like to speak thousands of thanks to all who have, in one way
or other, directly or indirectly they deserve my greatest gratitude.
vi
ABSTRACT
Paved roads are the main public transportation infrastructure in Malaysia.
Asphaltic pavements require a hefty amount of thoughts and engineering to be made
viable to keep up with the growing traffic as the country develops. The constant
increase in traffic loads by calls for improvements need to be done in order to maintain
a quality, yet economical paved roads. One of the critical breakthroughs is the use of
crumb rubber as additive in the binding substance of asphaltic pavements. Thus, this
study aims to assess the effectiveness of crumb rubber modified asphalt (CRMA)
pavements in Kuala Krai, Kelantan. This research was done through both controlled
experiment in a laboratory and also on site. The physical properties of the bitumen in
terms of their penetration, softening points, penetration index and flash points have
been further tested. For the asphalt mixture, they were tested in regards to their
Marshall properties such as stability, Void-In-Mix (VIM), flow and stiffness. The field
test begins with the coring test in order to assess the thickness of the asphalt pavement
layers in 16 spots along the study location. The densities and bitumen content of the
samples were then evaluated. Generally, CRMA proves its efficacy in providing an
effectual performance. In almost all aspect of experimentation revealed that CMRA
was the better choice. It is relatively stable, with sufficient VIM percentage to provide
flexibility. The field test did not contradict with these findings. Conclusively, CMRA
is able to accommodate and provide good riding quality while also being durable to
sustain all its challenges.
vii
ABSTRAK
Jalan berturap adalah infrastruktur pengangkutan awam utama di Malaysia.
Turapan asphalt memerlukan banyak idea dan kejuruteraan agar dapat membangun
secara praktikal dengan lalu lintas yang semakin meningkat seiring dengan kemajuan
negara. Peningkatan lalu lintas yang berterusan, menyebabkan kerja-kerja
penambahbaikan perlu dilakukan bagi mengekalkan jalan berturap yang berkualiti dan
ekonomik. Salah satu penyelesaian penting adalah dengan penggunaan serpihan getah
tayar kenderaan sebagai bahan tambahan dalam bahan pengikat turapan asphalt. Oleh
itu, kajian ini bertujuan untuk menilai keberkesanan turapan Crumb Rubber Modified
Asphalt (CRMA) di Kuala Krai, Kelantan. Penyelidikan ini dilakukan melalui
eksperimen terkawal di makmal dan juga di lokasi. Sifat fizikal bitumen dari segi
penusukan, titik lembut, indeks penusukan dan titik kilat telah diuji lebih lanjut. Untuk
campuran asfalt, bahan-bahan berkenaan diuji dengan ujian asphalt (Marshall Test)
seperti kestabilan, Void-In-Mix (VIM), aliran dan kekerasan. Ujian lapangan
dimulakan dengan ujian coring untuk menilai ketebalan lapisan turapan asfalt pada 16
tempat di sepanjang lokasi kajian. Kemudian, ketumpatan dan kandungan bitumen
sampel telah dinilai. Secara amnya, CRMA telah terbukti keberkesanannya dalam
memberikan prestasi yang berkesan. Dalam hampir semua aspek eksperimen, CMRA
telah menunjukkan bahawa ia adalah pilihan yang lebih baik. Ia agak stabil, dengan
peratusan VIM yang mencukupi untuk memberikan fleksibiliti. Keputusan ujian
lapangan tidak bertentangan dengan rekabentuk yang telah diluluskan.
Kesimpulannya, CMRA mampu menampung dan memberikan kualiti yang baik dan
juga tahan lama untuk menanggung beban aliran lalu lintas yang semakin meningkat.
viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE
DECLARATION iii
DEDICATION iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT v
ABSTRACT vi
ABSTRAK vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS viii
LIST OF TABLES xi
LIST OF FIGURES xii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xiii
LIST OF SYMBOLS xiv
LIST OF APPENDICES xv
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.0 Background Study 1
1.1 Problem Statement 3
1.2 Objectives 4
1.3 Scope of Study 4
1.4 Significance of Study 4
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 7
2.0 Introduction 7
2.1 Asphalt 7
2.2 Modification of Asphalt 7
2.3 Bitumen 9
2.4 Materials 10
2.4.1 Aggregate 11
2.4.2 Filler 13
2.5 Crumb Rubber 14
ix
2.5.1 Fiber Content 16
2.5.2 Moisture Content 16
2.5.3 Mineral Contaminants 16
2.5.4 Metal Contaminants 16
2.5.5 Chemical Composition 16
2.5.6 Source 17
2.5.7 Packaging and Labeling 17
2.6 Background of CRMA 18
2.6.1 Crumb Rubber Grinding Procedures 19
2.6.2 Properties of CRMA 20
2.6.3 Waste Materials (Scrap Tyres) 21
2.6.4 Rubber Modified Process 23
2.7 Preparation of Crumb Rubber Modified Binder 25
2.7.1 Blending Equipment 25
2.7.2 Blending Process 26
2.7.3 Terminal Blend 26
2.7.4 Completion of Blending 27
2.7.5 Sampling of CRMB 27
2.7.6 Storage of CRMB 28
2.7.7 Application of CRMB 28
CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY 31
3.0 Introduction 31
3.1 Overall Structure of Research Methodology 31
3.2 Bitumen Test 33
3.2.1 Penetration Test 33
3.2.2 Softening Point Test 34
3.2.3 Penetration Index 35
3.2.4 Flash Point Test 36
3.3 Asphalt Test 37
3.3.1 Extraction Test 37
3.3.2 Sieve Analysis 37
x
3.3.3 Marshall Test 39
3.3.4 Coring Test 40
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 43
4.0 Introduction 43
4.1 Bitumen Testing Result 43
4.1.1 Physical and rheological properties of CRMB 43
4.1.2 Penetration Test Result 44
4.1.3 Softening Point Result 45
4.1.4 Penetration Index Result 46
4.1.5 Flash Point Result 47
4.2 Proposed mix design for CRMA – Gap Graded Asphalt (GGA) 48
4.3 Marshall Properties Result 50
4.3.1 Voids in Mix Result 51
4.3.2 Stability Result 52
4.3.3 Flow Result 53
4.3.4 Stiffness Result 54
4.4 Site Monitoring Result 55
4.4.1 Summary of Sample Result CRMA 55
4.4.2 Coring Test 56
4.4.3 Marshall Density 57
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 59
5.0 Introduction 59
5.1 Conclusion 59
5.2 Recommendation 60
5.3 Limitation of Study 61
REFERENCES 63
xi
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE NO. TITLE PAGE
Table 2. 1 Chemical Composition of Crumb Rubber 17
Table 2. 2 Properties of CRMB (JKR, 2019) 28
Table 3. 1 Combined Aggregate Gradation for CRMA Mixture 38
Table 4. 1 CRMB Testing Result 43
Table 4. 2 Blending of Aggregates 48
Table 4. 3 Aggregate combined grading for proposed mix design 49
Table 4. 4 CRMA Marshall Properties result 50
Table 4. 5 CMA Marshall Properties result 50
Table 4. 6 AC14 Marshall Properties result 51
Table 4. 7 Comparison of Sample Result CRMA 56
Table 4. 8 Coring Test Result 56
Table 4. 9 Core Density Result 58
xii
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE NO. TITLE PAGE
Figure 2. 1 The Size of Aggregates 13
Figure 2. 2 Quarry Dust 14
Figure 2. 3 Scrap tyres 22
Figure 2. 4 Rubber Modified Process. 25
Figure 3. 1 Flowchart of the Research Methodology 32
Figure 3. 2 The Penetration Test 33
Figure 3. 3 The Softening Test 34
Figure 3. 4 The Flash Point 36
Figure 3. 5 The Bitumen Content Test 37
Figure 3. 6 The Sieve Analysis Test 38
Figure 3. 7 The Marshall Test 39
Figure 3. 8 The Coring Test 41
Figure 4. 1 Penetration 45
Figure 4. 2 Softening Points 46
Figure 4. 3 Penetration Index 47
Figure 4. 4 Flash Points 48
Figure 4. 5 Sieve analysis for proposed mix design 49
Figure 4. 6 VIM percentage 52
Figure 4. 7 Stability 53
Figure 4. 8 Flow 54
Figure 4. 9 Stiffness Result 55
xiii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
CRMB
CRMA
CR-GGA
CR-SMA
CR-OGFC
CR-SAMI
CMB
CMA
HMA
AC 14
ASTM
BS
PI
MS
VIM
PG 76
Pen. 60-70
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Crumb Rubber Modified Binder
Crumb Rubber Modified Asphalt
Crumb Rubber – Gap Graded Asphalt
Crumb Rubber – Stone Mastic Asphalt
Crumb Rubber – Open Graded Friction Course
Crumb Rubber – Stress Absorbing Membrane Interlayer
Cup Lump Modified Binder
Cup Lump Modified Asphalt
Hot Mix Asphalt
Asphaltic Concrete 14
American Society for Testing and Materials
British Standards
Penetration Index
Malaysian Standards
Voids in mix
Performance Grade 76
Penetration Grade 60-70
xiv
LIST OF SYMBOLS
°C
%
g
N
N/mm
mm
cm
um
Pa.S
kPa
rpm
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Celsius
Percent
Gram
Newton
Newton/millimeter
Millimeter
Centimetre
Micrometre
Pascal per second
Kilopascal
Revolutions per minute
xv
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX TITLE PAGE
Appendix A Nomograph X 67
Appendix B1 The Details of Result for Sample 1 68
Appendix B2 The Details of Result for Sample 2 70
Appendix B3 The Details of Result for Sample 3 72
Appendix B4 The Details of Result for Sample 4 74
Appendix B5 The Details of Result for Sample 5 76
Appendix C Compaction Test Result 78
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.0 Background Study
In pavement structures, wearing course and base coarse aggregates are mixed
and bound using bitumen. Asphalt is used in road pavement as it’s very economical
and fulfills the roadway design requirements, for example; good ride quality, skid-
resistant surface, quiet surface and low maintenance. However, asphaltic pavements
do have some weaknesses, especially in extreme climates where it becomes brittle and
hard in cold environments and soft in hot environments making it easy to crack when
the temperature fluctuates (Al-maamori and Hussen, 2014). Another major factor for
road damage is the current traffic capacity and the volume of road users that increases
year by year, defecting and affecting the pavement condition. Heavy traffic and high
loading weight are also significant factors affecting the quality and pavement
performance. Therefore, to decrease damage and defect, an improvement is needed in
the road pavement structures. Globally, many additive materials such as Polymer
Modified Asphalt (PMA), Stone Mastic Asphalt (SMA), Cold in-place recycling
(CIPR), Glassphalt, Cup Lump Modified Asphalt (CMA) and Crumb Rubber Modified
Asphalt (CRMA) are used to make road pavements stronger (Huang et al., 2007).
In previous years , the growing popularity of crumb rubber, a recycled material
from End-of - Life Tyres (ELTs), has led to several studies to be carried out in order
to improve the material cycle where rubber, produced as a by-product of crushing and
sieving scrap tyres, has become the resource needed in another production process,
such as the construction of road pavement layers. Crumb Rubber Modified Asphalt
(CRMA) has various applications in the production of asphalt mixtures (Issa, 2016).
The aim is to find an alternative method of disposal of tyres and to improve the
performance of asphalt mixtures. Rubber, in general, has a wider range of performance
temperatures than bituminous mixtures, as they do not melt in heat and do not crack in
2
cold temperatures. However, the performance of rubberized materials varies
considerably depending on the processes and technology used. Some studies, indicate
that CRMA modified mixtures are less affected by moisture damage compared to
traditional mixtures, and that rubber particles contribute to the completion of higher
performance of both binders and mixtures at high temperatures (Farina et al., 2014).
On the other hand, if other processes are adopted, certain studies have shown that a
higher volume of air voids would be present due to the decreased compaction of the
mixture could lead to a higher moisture content. Therefore, these types of CRMA
mixes are more susceptible to moisture than conventional mixes.
Besides that, crumb rubber is an appropriate pavement additive due to one of
its characteristics, which is the ability to support the weakness of asphalt. The elastic
property of crumb rubber also has the potential to improve skid resistance and asphalt
durability (Farina et al., 2014). The usage of crumb rubber is proven to be good and
reliable. Moreover, crumb rubber can also help in decreasing the effect of exhaustion
and cracking that occur on most pavements. In addition, it can save the cost for the
maintenance of roadway pavement as pavements are less vulnerable to damages as a
result of the crumb rubber additives.
The addition of crumb rubber typically results in an increase in the complex
modulus of the binder as well as a reduction in the phase angle, particularly at high
temperatures, which has a favourable effect on the rutting resistance (Hassan et al .
2014). However, these materials are not without limitations. For example, the
instability during storage is one of the disadvantages of the industrial production of
this material. The rubber modified bitumen has a higher heterogeneity and there is a
significant difference in density between the bitumen and the rubber granules. When
that method is applied, the rubber particles have the propensity to sink to the bottom,
and also decreasing the storage constancy (Chen et al., 2018).
It can be understood from previous considerations that there are a number of
different types of processes and technologies when crumb rubber is used in asphalt
mixture applications that result in different performance and durability. With this in
mind, this study provides scientific research with a description and nomenclature of
3
key mechanisms, processes and technologies related to the use of crumb rubber in road
pavements.
1.1 Problem Statement
The inappropriate management of solid waste such as rubber tyres and plastic
bags may progress into very serious environmentally related issues. Several studies
have shown that about 90% of solid waste is disposed of in open dumps and landfills,
creating problems and hazards to public health and the environment (Sharholy et al.,
2007). Waste tyres are one of the environmental problems in Malaysia. This problem
needs to be urgently solved because waste tyres are not easily decomposed. The
recycling of such tyres would be one method to save the space. Besides that, the
application of recycled automobile tyres and plastics also can solve the environmental
problem.
Additionally, the failures of pavement have increased significantly over the
years due to the increase in road traffic which is proportional to the degree of
insufficient maintenance. Over the years, the damage of roadway pavement in
Malaysia has been increasing. A great deal of maintenance work needs to be done to
reduce defects or damage on the roadway. This is because of the heavy traffic load in
Malaysia. When the road users increase, the loading on the road will simultaneously
be increased and the pavement will develop complications if the pavement cannot
support the high loading or volume (Sulyman et al., 2014).
Moreover, asphalt cannot withstand drastic weather changes as it hardens in
cold environments and softens in hot environments. Previous studies have shown that
a number of failures have caused its quality and pavement performance to decrease
due to low temperature cracking, extreme fatigue, and rutting at high temperatures
(Chen et al., 2018).
Thus, the potential of crumb rubber as an additive in asphalt pavement has been
further investigated in this research.
4
1.2 Objectives
The main objective of this project is to investigate the strength and condition
of road pavement when crumb rubber is used as additive in asphalt pavement. The
specific objectives for the project are:
i. To identify Crumb Rubber Modified Bitumen (CRMB) properties compared
to penetration grade bitumen.
ii. To investigate the performance of Crumb Rubber Modified Asphalt (CRMA)
compared to other types of asphalt mixtures.
1.3 Scope of Study
The research has involved the study of the performance of modified bitumen
using the waste materials crumb rubber has been added as a modifier to the bituminous
mixture by carrying out laboratory procedures using the equipment available in the
road laboratory. The bituminous mixture sample was tested (in the laboratory and
field) for its performance and analysis was carried out based on the results.
1.4 Significance of Study
The aim of the project is to study the performance of crumb rubber in modified
bitumen. By doing this, it will enable the reduction of costs as well as improve the
performance of flexible pavement for future road construction due to the involvement
of a more environmentally friendly materials.
5
This research is important in order to solve the problem of pavement strength
along with environmental issues which arise from waste tyres. Both issues can be
resolved by reusing scrap tyres by producing crumb rubber that will then be used in
road construction by adding it as a sub-base or surface coarse pavement layer.
One of the major advantages of using CRM in road pavements is that, it can
improve the resistance of bitumen to surface initiated cracks, decrease the fatigue,
reflection, and cracking, improve toughness as well as a reduction in road pavement
maintenance costs (Liu et al., 2009).
63
REFERENCES
Al-maamori, M.H., Hussen, M.M., (2014). Use of Crumb Rubber As A Way to
Improve Performance Grade for Asphalt Cement. Academic Research
International. 5(1), pp. 66-77
Amirkhanian, S.N., Xiao, F., (2008). Laboratory investigation of moisture damage in
rubberized asphalt mixtures containing reclaimed asphalt pavement.
International Journal of Pavement Engineering. 10(5), pp. 319-328.
Arshad, M., Ahmed, M.F., (2017). Potential use of reclaimed asphalt pavement and
recycled concrete aggregate in base/subbase layers of flexible pavements.
Construction and Building Materials. 151, pp. 83-97.
Ayar, P., Moreno-Navarro, F., Rubio-Gamez, M.C., (2016). The healing capabilities
of asphalt pavements: a state of the art review. Journal of Cleaner Production.
113, pp.28-40.
Chavez, F., Marcobal, J., Gallego, J., (2019). Laboratory evaluation of the mechanical
properties of asphalt mixtures with rubber incorporated by the wet, dry, and
semi-wet process. Construction and Building Materials. 205, pp. 164-174.
Chen, S., You, Z., Sharifi, N.P., Yao, H., Gong, F., (2018). Material selections in
asphalt pavement for wet-freeze climate zones: A review. Construction and
Building Materials. 201(9), pp. 510-525.
Farina, A., Zanett, M., Santagata, E., Belngini, G., Lanotte, M., (2014). Life Cycle
Assessment of Road Pavements Containing Crumb Rubber from End-Of-Life
Tires. Department of Environment, Land and Infrastructure Engineering.
Farshad, S.K., Fakhri, M., Azami, A., (2017). Evaluation of warm mix asphalt
mixtures containing reclaimed asphalt pavement crumb rubber. Journal of
Cleaner Production. 165, pp. 1125-1132.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (2012) The use and performance of asphalt
binder modifier with polyphosphoric acid. Available at:
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/pub_details.cfm?id=737 (Accessed on 27
May 2020)
64
Gu, F., Ma, W., West, R.C., Taylor, A.J., Zhang, Y., (2019). Structural performance
and sustainability assessment of cold central-plant and in-place recycled
asphalt pavements: a case study. Journal of Cleaner Production. 208, p.1513-
1523.
Han, L., Zheng, M., Wang, C., (2016). Current status and development of terminal
blend tyre rubber modified asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 128,
pp. 399-409
Hassan, N.A., Airey, G.D., Jaya, R.P., Mashros, N., Aziz, M.M.A., (2014). A Review
of Crumb Rubber Modification in Dry Mix Rubberised Asphalt Mixture.
Available at: www.jurnalteknologi.utm.my (Accessed on 14 June 2020)
Huang, Y., Bird, R.N., Heidrich, O., (2007) A review of recycled solid waste material
in asphalt pavements. Resources, Conservation, and Recycling. 52(1), pp. 58-
73.
Irfan, M., Ali, Y., Ahmed, S., Hafeez, I. (2017) Performance Evaluation of Crumb
Rubber-Modified Asphalt Mixtures Based on Laboratory and Field
Investigations. Arab J Sci Eng. 43, pp. 1795-1806.
Issa, Y., (2016). Effect of Adding Waste Tires Rubber to Asphalt Mix. International
Journal of Scientific Research and Innovative Technology. 3(5), pp. 61-68.
Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia (2008). Standard Specification for Road Works, Section
4: Flexible Pavement. Malaysia: Jabatan Kerja Raya.
Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia (2017). Selenggara Jalan, Apa Yang Anda Tidak Perlu
Tahu, Edisi ke-4. Malaysia: Jabatan Kerja Raya.
Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia (2018). Ujian Makmal: Bitumen, Aggregate, Asphalt.
Malaysia: Jabatan Kerja Raya.
Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia (2019). Addendum Specification for Rubber Modified
Asphalt. Standard Specification for Road Works, Section 4: Flexible Pavement.
Malaysia: Jabatan Kerja Raya.
Lee, S.J., Akisetty, C.K., Amirkhanian, S.N., (2008). The effect of crumb rubber
modifier (CRM) on the performance properties of rubberized binders in HMA
pavements. Construction and Building Materials. 22(7), pp. 1368-1376.
Liu, S., Cao, W., Fang, J., Shang, S., (2009). Variance analysis and performance
evaluation of different crumb rubber modified (CRM) asphalt. Construction
and Building Materials, 23(7), pp. 2701-2708.
65
Mashaan, N.S., Ali, A.H., Karim, M.R., Abdelaziz, M., (2014). Review on Using
Crumb Rubber in Reinforcement of Asphalt Pavement. Scientific World
Journal, 2014, pp. 1-22.
Mashaan, N.S., Asim, H.A., Koting, S., Karim, M.R., (2013). Performance Evaluation
of Crumb Rubber Modified Stone Mastic Asphaltic Pavement in Malaysia.
Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2013, pp. 1-8.
McDonald, C.H., (1975) U.S. Patent No. US3891585A, Washington DC: First
Interstate Bank of Arizona
Mohammad, L.N., Cooper Jr., S.B., Elseifi, M.A., (2011). Characterization of HMA
Mixture Containing High Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Content with Crum
Rubber Additives. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 23(11).
Nordgren, T., Said, S.F., Carlsson, H., Vilman, L., (2015). Performance of asphalt
rubber pavements.
Norhidayah A.H., Airey, G.D., Khan, R., Collop, C., (2012). Nondestructive
Characterisation of the Effect of Asphalt Mixture Compaction on Aggregate
Orientation and Segregation Using X-ray Computed Tomography. Chinese
Society of Pavement Engineering. 5(2), pp. 84-92.
Norhidayah, A.H., Ahmad, K.A., Abdullah, M.E., Daura, H.A., Ambak, K., (2017). A
review of using porous asphalt pavement as an alternative to conventional
pavement in stormwater treatment. World Journal of Engineering. 14(5).
Norouzi, A., Kim, R.Y., (2017). Mechanistic evaluation of fatigue cracking in asphalt
pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. 18, pp. 530-546
O’Flaherty, A.M., Hughes, D., (2015). Highways: location, design, construction, and
maintenance of road pavements (5th ed.) Iowa: ICE Publishing
Parhamifar, E., (2016) Asphalt Pavements (1st ed.). Goteborg: Chalmers University of
Technology.
Presti, D.L., Airey, G., Partal, P., (2012). Manufacturing Terminal and Field Bitumen-
Tyre Rubber Blends: The Importance of Processing Conditions. Procedia –
Social and Behavioral Sciences. 53, pp. 485-494.
Sharholy, M., Ahmad, K., Vaishya, R.C., Gupta, R.D., (2007). Municipal solid waste
characteristics and management in Allahabad, India. Waste Management,
27(4), pp. 490-496.
66
Shen. J., Li, B., Xie, Zhaoxing X., (2017). Interaction between crumb rubber modifier
(CRM) and asphalt binder in dry process. Construction and Building Materials.
149, p. 202-206.
Stimilli, A., Virgili, A., Canestrari, F., (2017). Warm recycling of flexible pavements:
Effectiveness of Warm Mix Asphalt additives on modified bitumen and
mixture performance. Journal of Cleaner Production. 156, pp. 911-922
Sulyman, M., Sienkewicz, M., Haponiuk, J., (2014). Asphalt pavement material
improvement: a review. International Journal of Environmental Science and
Development, 5(5), pp. 444-454.
Yang, X., Shen, A., Guo, Y., Lyu, Z., (2018). Effect of process parameters of the high
temperature performance and reaction mechanism of CRMA. Petroleum
Science and Technology, 36(19), pp. 1537-1543.
Zainal, O., Rosli, M.H., Naqiuddin, M.W., Idham, M.K., Naqibah, K., (2018). Cup
Lump Modified Asphalt Mixture Along Jalan Kuala Lumpur – Kuantan,
Daerah Termeloh, Pahang. MATEC Web of Conference, 250.