+ All Categories
Home > Documents > NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

Date post: 16-Jan-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 8 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
168
NCARB BY THE NUMBERS 2020
Transcript
Page 1: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

7

NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

2020

Page 2: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

© 2020 NCARB by the Numbers By the National Council of Architectural Registration Boards. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted for reproduction without the prior permission of the publisher.

Join the Conversation on Social Media#NBTN

Page 3: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

1

Table of Contents

Welcome to the 2020 NCARB by the Numbers ............................................................................................................... 3

State of Licensure .................................................................................................................................................................. 4–13

Public Perception of Licensure (BSG) ............................................................................................................................ 14–21

Education ............................................................................................................................................................................... 22–33

Experience .............................................................................................................................................................................. 34–41

Examination ........................................................................................................................................................................... 42–55

Demographics ..................................................................................................................................................................... 56–69

Navigating the Path ............................................................................................................................................................ 70–79

NCARB/NOMA Joint Survey ......................................................................................................................................... 80–93

Inside NCARB ...................................................................................................................................................................... 94–99

Jurisdictions by the Numbers ..................................................................................................................................... 100–139

About This Report ................................................................................................................................................................... 160

About NCARB ............................................................................................................................................................................ 161

Glossary ............................................................................................................................................................................... 162–163

Page 4: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

2

Page 5: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

3

Welcome to the 2020 NCARB by the NumbersWhen NCARB by the Numbers was first published in 2012, the architecture profession was recovering from the impact of the Great Recession. Over the years, the trends highlighted in NCARB by the Numbers have helped demonstrate the health, resilience, and future of the architecture profession.

As we release the ninth edition of our annual data publication this year, the architecture profession faces another period of dramatic change. Changes brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic—as well as pre-existing shifts in technology, firm structure, employment, mobility, work process, and beyond—may quickly alter the practice of architecture and recent trends seen on the path to licensure.

The data reported in this publication was captured at the end of the 2019 calendar year, and much of the information gathered demonstrates growth and positive evolution: continued increases in the number of U.S.-licensed architects, higher demand for additional out-of-state licenses, increased diversity and gender parity at many career stages, and a slight decrease in the time it takes to earn an architecture license. While some of these trends may change in the year ahead, there is reassurance in knowing the profession was in excellent health going into this challenging time, and we hope it emerges stronger and more dynamic than ever before. With this publication as a baseline for the state of licensure, we can monitor the impact and identify opportunities to provide support in the years to come.

We are excited to report on several new areas this year, including breakdowns of race and gender representation at various career stages, a detailed exploration of exam pass rates and retakes, and further insight into when candidates stop pursuing a license.

In addition to data gathered from NCARB Record and Certificate holders, this year’s NCARB by the Numbers also features a sneak peek of results from a survey on equity, diversity, and inclusion in licensure conducted in partnership with the National Organization of Minority Architects (NOMA). Insights from the survey, combined with NCARB’s own data, will help shape ongoing improvements to the Architectural Experience Program® (AXP®) and the Architect Registration Examination® (ARE®), as we work to ensure the licensure process is fair and equitable for all individuals.

The 2020 NCARB by the Numbers offers a great deal of insight into the evolution of architectural licensure, and I hope you enjoy reading it as we anticipate the changes the future will bring.

Michael J. Armstrong Chief Executive Officer National Council of Architectural Registration Boards

Page 6: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

State of Licensure

The number of U.S. architects continued to rise in 2019, suggesting that the profession heading into 2020 was healthy and growing. At the start of 2020, there were over 116,000 licensed practitioners across the 55 jurisdictions, a 1 percent increase from 2018. Architects also collectively hold over 137,000 out-of-state (reciprocal) licenses. This is evidence that the profession has an effective path to mobility.

Nearly 4,000 individuals completing their final core licensure requirement in 2019, taking an average of 12.7 years to do so. This is a 20 percent drop in the number of candidates who reached this milestone compared to 2018. 2019’s decrease in candidates is significant but expected following several years of high completion volumes. In addition, the 6 percent drop in the number of individuals actively working toward licensure during the year indicates that candidates may be under less pressure to finish quickly following ARE 4.0’s retirement in June 2018.

Although 2019 saw an increase in time to complete both the individual experience and examination programs—an impact often seen after programmatic changes—the total time to finish earning an architecture degree, gaining experience, and taking the examination fell by about four months compared to 2018.

4

Page 7: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

+1%CHANGE

+10%CHANGE

116,242 Architects in the United States

137,639 Reciprocal licenses

Number of candidates who completed core requirements in 2019

3,986 -20%CHANGE

63,855Licensure candidates

with NCARB Records (-1%)

Active licensure candidates

38,287 -6% change

32.6 YEARSAverage age at AXP and ARE completion

12.7 YEARSTime to complete core requirements for licensure (-2%)

5

Page 8: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

6

60K

70K

80K

90K

100K

110K

120K

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

Year

Lice

nsed

Arc

hite

cts

116,242 LICENSED ARCHITECTS +1%

Number of U.S. Architects Continues to IncreaseThe number of architects licensed in the United States rose to 116,242 in 2019, according to the annual Survey of Architectural Registration Boards. This is a 1 percent increase from 2018 and represents a 10 percent increase compared to the number of U.S. architects seen a decade ago. This suggests that the pipeline of new architects continues to offset the number of retiring architects. The steady growth seen in recent years addresses a previous concern that the number of practitioners would dwindle as baby boomers (who made up a large proportion of the architect population) began to step away from the profession. However, many architects maintain their professional licenses into retirement, which could also impact this data.

Each year, NCARB collects this data from its 55 Member Boards, which include the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Page 9: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

7

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

JU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

STAT

E O

F

LICE

NSU

RE

105K

110K

115K

125K

120K

130K

135K

140K

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

Year

Reci

proc

al L

icen

ses

137,639 RECIPROCAL LICENSES +10%

Mobility in Architecture on the RiseThe 2019 Survey of Architectural Registration Boards also revealed that there continue to be more reciprocal (out-of-state) licenses than resident licenses issued in the United States. Regulators and legislators frequently use data related to reciprocal licenses as an indicator of mobility in licensed professions.

There were 137,639 reciprocal licenses reported in 2019, approximately 10 percent more than in 2018 and over 20,000 higher than the number of individual architects. This marks the largest increase seen in recent years and could be a result of many factors, including market needs and efforts to publicize pathways to reciprocity for architects. The total number of reciprocal licenses suggests that the average architect is licensed in at least two U.S. jurisdictions, and that the current path to mobility in the profession is effective.

Page 10: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

8

Architects Rise in Comparison to U.S. Population While the number of architects licensed in the United States has risen over 10 percent in the last decade, the total U.S. population has risen just 6 percent, according to data from the U.S. Census Bureau. There are now slightly more architects per capita (roughly 1 architect to every 2,800 people) than there were in 2010 (roughly 1 architect to every 2,900 people). Many architects maintain their professional licenses into retirement, which could also impact this data.

TO DO

-1%

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

10%

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

Year

Perc

ent

Gro

wth INCREASE IN

U.S. POPULATION

INCREASE IN ARCHITECTS 10%

6%

Page 11: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

9

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

JU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

STAT

E O

F

LICE

NSU

RE

0

1K

2K

3K

4K

5K

6K

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

Year

Can

dida

tes

Com

plet

ing

Cor

e Re

quire

men

ts

3,986 LICENSURE CANDIDATES -20%

Number of Candidates Completing Core Licensure Requirements FallsIn 2019, nearly 4,000 candidates finished their final core requirement for licensure—a step that indicates an individual has completed the national experience and examination programs. This is a reliable indicator that an individual has become (or soon will become) licensed in a U.S. jurisdiction.

The number of candidates completing their final core requirement fell by 20 percent compared to 2018. This decline was expected following the record high seen in 2017, which was a result of recent experience and examination program changes. For reference, the number of candidates who completed their final core requirement in 2019 is just above the decade’s average of 3,852.

As candidates become familiar with the new experience and examination requirements, the number of candidates completing core requirements is expected to stabilize at a new “normal” level.

Note: The core requirements for licensure in the United States include gaining an education (typically a degree from a NAAB-accredited program), completing the AXP, and passing the ARE. Some jurisdictions have additional requirements that fall outside this “core,” such as a supplemental exam.

Page 12: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

10

Percentage of Candidate Pool Completing Core Requirements DipsThe 3,986 candidates who completed their final core requirement for licensure in 2019 equated to approximately 10 percent of all individuals actively working toward earning a license in 2019. This is a 2 percentage point decrease compared to 2018, but still well above the percentages seen from 2010-2015.

While the number of candidates who completed the path to licensure in 2019 was significantly smaller than in recent years (See Number of Candidates Completing Core Requirements Falls) the candidate pool itself is also smaller. This is a result of the high number of candidates who completed the path—and therefore left the pool—in 2016-2018.

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

10%

11%

12%

13%

14%

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

Year

Perc

ent

of R

epor

ting/

Test

ing

Lice

nsur

e C

andi

date

s

10% OF LICENSURE CANDIDATES

PERCENTAGE POINTS

-2%

Page 13: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

11

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

JU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

STAT

E O

F

LICE

NSU

RE

Number of Licensure Candidates DecreasesIn 2019, just over 38,000 individuals actively worked toward licensure by reporting experience, taking the examination, or both. This is a 6 percent decrease in the number of candidates making AXP and/or ARE progress compared to 2018.

The increase in candidates with active Records who are not making experience or examination progress indicates that candidates may be under less pressure to finish the licensure process quickly following the June 2018 retirement of ARE 4.0, but still intend to earn a license.

Of the pool of candidates making progress in 2019, just over 5,100 overlapped programs by taking at least one ARE division while reporting AXP experience. This marks the third year in a row the number of candidates overlapping has shrunk; however, the majority of candidates still overlap these core requirements at some point during their licensure pathway (see Most Candidates Overlap the ARE and AXP).

0

5K

10K

15K

20K

25K

30K

35K

40K

45K

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

Repo

rtin

g/Te

stin

g Li

cens

ure

Can

dida

tes

38,287LICENSURE CANDIDATES

Reporting Experience

Testing andReporting Experience

Year

Testing

-6%

Page 14: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

12

Majority of Candidates Not Actively Working Toward Licensure Are AXP CompleteIn 2019, over 25,500 candidates maintained an active NCARB Record, but didn’t report any experience or take a division of the ARE. While these candidates did not make progress toward licensure in 2019, their active NCARB Record indicates that they intend to return to the licensure path in the future.

Of candidates who maintained an active Record but didn’t work toward licensure, over half (54 percent) have completed the AXP—28 percent of these individuals have started the ARE, but 26 percent have not. This suggests that over a quarter of licensure candidates choose to take a break between completing their experience requirement and starting the exam.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Perc

enta

ge o

f C

andi

date

s N

ot A

ctiv

ely

Wor

king

Tow

ard

Lice

nsur

e

AXP in Progress, ARE Not Started

AXP and ARE in Progress

AXP Not Started, ARE in Progress

AXP Complete, ARE Not Started

AXP Complete, ARE Started

Core Requirements

Complete

No Progress Graduated Neither AXP Nor ARE in

Progress

18%

5% 5%

26% 28%

2%

15%

1%

Page 15: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

13

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

JU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

STAT

E O

F

LICE

NSU

RE

Candidates Complete Core Licensure Requirements SoonerThe average licensure candidate who completed their final core requirement for licensure in 2019—including education, experience, and examination—took 12.7 years. This is 2 percent less time (about four months) than candidates who completed their final core requirement in 2018.

On average, 6.8 of those years were spent completing NCARB’s experience and examination programs, an increase of 3 percent (about two months) compared to 2018. This corresponds with slight increases in the average time to complete each program, likely driven by the launch of the AXP and the transition to ARE 5.0.

Note: Historical data can shift because licensure candidates can backdate experience up to five years.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

Year

Year

s to

Lic

ensu

re

Time to Complete AXP and ARE

Time to Complete College, AXP, and ARE

12.7 YEARS

-2%

6.8 YEARS

+3%

Page 16: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

|

2020

14

Public Perception of Licensure

In January 2019, NCARB partnered with Benenson Strategy Group to better understand the public’s perception of licensure and regulation—revealing that most voters feel that professional licensure for architects is an important factor in protecting the public health, safety, and welfare.

Building on this initial study, the Alliance for Responsible Professional Licensing (ARPL) and Benenson Strategy Group conducted a follow-up survey in fall 2019 to get a better understanding of the public’s position on current licensing standards and requirements. The survey received nearly 1,000 responses from registered voters, representing a diverse mix of genders, ages, races, and political ideologies.

The study indicates that while voters are open to changes in the regulatory system, most voters believe minimum competency requirements are important, and support the current regulatory model used by architecture and other professions. In addition, most respondents would prefer to require licensure as the default system, and value the current role of regulatory boards.

14

Page 17: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

JU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

15

75%feel minimum

qualifications for practice are important.

OFVOTERS 67%

support requiring specific education,experience, and examination qualifications with oversight by a state licensing board

OFVOTERS

feel professional licensing should be required unless it’s proven that eliminating licensure doesn’t put the public at risk.

71% OFVOTERS

feel licensing board’s responsibilities are important

90% OFVOTERS

Page 18: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

|

2020

16

ExtremelyImportant

SomewhatImportant

SomewhatUnimportant

Unimportant

Not Importantat All

Neutral

Important

56%19%11%10%

1%2%

1%

Voters Support Minimum Competency Requirements When asked how important is it that complex, highly technical professions ensure a person working in that field has met, and continues to meet, minimum qualifications to perform their work, 75 percent of surveyed voters indicated it is important or extremely important. Twenty-one percent indicated it is neutral or somewhat important, and only 4 percent indicated that holding practitioners to minimum qualifications in certain professions is not important.

Industries that voters considered complex and highly technical—with a direct impact on public health, safety, and welfare—include accounting, architecture, and engineering.

This demonstrates that the public recognizes the need for minimum competency requirements and supports licensing regulations for architecture and other professions like it.

Page 19: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

17

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

JU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

Public Prefers Licensing Standards When asked to select a statement that aligns with their views on professional licensing in the United States, over two-thirds (71 percent) of respondents indicated that professional licensing should be required unless it can be proven that eliminating licensing will not have a negative impact on public health and safety.

The remaining 29 percent indicated that they believe professional licensing should not be required unless it is proven necessary for public protection.

This highlights that a significant majority of the public prefers requiring professional licensing as the default approach toward regulation.

29%

71%

Licensing of certain occupations should not be required unless it can be proven that licensing is necessary to protect public health and safety.

Licensing of certain occupations should be required unless it can be proven that eliminating licensing will not have a negative impact on public health and safety.

Page 20: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

|

2020

18

Voters Prefer the Current Regulatory Model When asked which regulatory model provides the best protection to consumers, two-thirds of surveyed voters indicated that practitioners should complete education, experience, and examination requirements set out by a professional licensing board—the model currently used by the architecture profession in all 55 U.S. jurisdictions.

The remaining third indicated that professionals should be allowed to practice unlicensed as long as they inform consumers that they do not hold a license, leaving responsibility for public protection up to the consumer.

The two-thirds majority suggests that professional licensing boards are viewed favorably by the public, and that the three “E’s” of education, experience, and examination remain critical components of the licensure process.

33%

67%

A professional must inform a consumer if they are unlicensed. The consumer can then choose to hire the person or not based on word of mouth, recommendations, and reviews.

A professional must pass exams and meet requirements for education and experience as overseen by a professional licensing board.

Page 21: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

19

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

JU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

Public Believes Licensing Boards’ Role Is Important While most respondents were aware licensing boards exist, many were unaware of the specific duties they perform in order to protect the public. After being made aware of these responsibilities, most respondents indicated that the functions a board carries out on behalf of the public are important.

Ninety percent of surveyed voters indicated that the board’s responsibility to assess professionals’ qualifications is important, 91 percent indicated the board’s role in enforcing disciplinary actions and investigating consumer complaints is important, and 92 percent indicated the board’s responsibility to ensure professionals maintain continuing education is important—with over half of respondents indicating “Very Important” for each item.

.

Not Important at All Not Very Important Somewhat important Very Important

0

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Perc

ent

Assess Licensure Qualification

Enforce Disciplinary Actions and Investigate Consumer Complaints

Ensure Continuing Education

4% 4%6% 7%

36% 35%

56% 55%52%

39%

3% 3%

Page 22: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

|

2020

20

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Perc

ent

Strongly Oppose Somewhat Oppose Somewhat Support Strongly SupportUnsure

6%

19%

12%

43%

2%

25%

14%

Voters Are Open to Regulatory Reform In recent years, many states have proposed legislation that would reform the current regulatory process for architecture and other professions—these proposals include consumer choice acts, “right to earn a living” bills, and interstate licensing compacts, among others.

When asked if they would support potential legislation to change professional licensing laws regardless of their current awareness level of that legislation, over 40 percent of voters indicated that they were unsure whether they would support or oppose regulatory reforms. Thirty-nine percent of respondents said they would support changes to professional licensing laws, and just 18 percent said they would oppose changes to current licensing laws.

This suggests that while many are undecided, the average voter is open to the idea of changing current regulatory requirements.

Page 23: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

21

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

JU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Perc

ent

Strongly Oppose Somewhat Oppose Somewhat Support Strongly SupportUnsure

24%21%

43%

18%

25%

12%

Informed Voters More Likely to Oppose Regulatory Reform However, after learning about the benefits of licensing and the potential impact of proposed changes to professional licensing, 45 percent of respondents indicated they would oppose regulatory reforms.

The proportion of undecided voters fell by 25 percent—increasing the proportion who indicated strongly or somewhat oppose.

This suggests that informed voters are more likely to oppose potential regulatory reforms than uninformed voters, highlighting the importance of public awareness regarding potential local legislation.

Page 24: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

Education

The most common—and the most widely accepted—path to becoming licensed in the United States includes earning a degree from an architecture program accredited by the National Architectural Accrediting Board (NAAB). On average, licensure candidates with a degree from a NAAB-accredited program have greater success when taking the ARE. The NAAB’s 2019 data also reveals that both new and total enrollment in accredited programs is increasing, although the number of graduates remains steady.

In 2019, just over half of newly licensed architects started their NCARB Record while in school, indicating that the majority of students are now overlapping experience with education. Growth in the proportion of individuals starting their Record in school suggests NCARB’s efforts to raise awareness of the licensure process are helping students make early progress on their experience and examination requirements for licensure.

22

Page 25: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

47%Were women

5,985Graduates

accepted, with 480 studentsenrolled at 17 schools

25 IPAL PROGRAMS

During the 2018-2019 school year

26,061 STUDENTSwere enrolled in NAAB-accredited programs

Graduates fromnon-accredited

programs finished the ARE 4 months sooner

On average, graduatesfrom accredited

programs achievehigher pass rates (6%)

82%of licensure candidates

graduated from anaccredited program

23

Page 26: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

|

2020

24

0

2K

4K

6K

8K

10K

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

Year

New

Stu

dent

s

7,737NEW STUDENTS +2%

New Enrollment ImprovesAccording to data from the NAAB, over 7,700 new students enrolled in a NAAB-accredited program in 2019—a 2 percent increase from the previous school year. Of these new students, 48 percent are enrolled in Bachelor of Architecture programs, and 51 percent are enrolled in Master of Architecture programs. Less than 1 percent are enrolled in Doctor of Architecture programs.

The total population of new enrollees continues to be split evenly between men and women, aligning with the near-gender parity seen for candidates beginning the experience program and a sign that equity may increase in later career stages in the coming years.

Note: This data is provided to the NAAB by accredited programs and was published in the 2019 NAAB Report on Accreditation in Architecture, available at www.naab.org. Students enrolled in non-accredited architecture programs are not represented.

Page 27: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

JU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

LICE

NSU

RE

25

Total Enrollment ImprovesJust over 26,000 students were concurrently enrolled in a NAAB-accredited program in the 2018-2019 school year, up 3 percent from the 2017-2018 school year. This is the highest total enrollment seen since 2013.

Of these students, 58 percent are enrolled in Bachelor of Architecture programs, 42 percent in Master of Architecture programs, and less than 1 percent in Doctor of Architecture programs. Fifty-one percent are men, and 49 percent are women.

Note: This data is provided to the NAAB by accredited programs and was published in the 2019 NAAB Report on Accreditation in Architecture, available at www.naab.org. Students enrolled in non-accredited architecture programs are not represented.

0

5K

10K

15K

20K

25K

30K

Year

Tota

l Enr

ollm

ent

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

26,061STUDENTS ENROLLED

+3%

Page 28: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

|

2020

26

0

1K

2K

3K

4K

5K

6K

7K

8K

Year

Gra

duat

es

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

5,985GRADUATES

0%

Number of Graduates Holds SteadyIn 2019, 5,985 degrees were awarded by NAAB-accredited programs across the country, virtually the same amount of degrees awarded in 2018. This is slightly lower than the average number of graduates seen across the decade, which is 6,138. This drop could correspond to the gradual decline in total enrollment seen between 2013 and 2017.

Of these graduates, 53 percent were men and 47 percent were women—a 1 percentage point decrease in gender equity compared to 2018, when women represented 48 percent of graduates.

Note: This data is provided to NAAB by accredited programs and was published in the 2019 NAAB Report on Accreditation in Architecture, available at www.naab.org. Students enrolled in non-accredited architecture programs are not represented.

Page 29: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

JU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

LICE

NSU

RE

27

Year

Perc

ent

of N

ew A

rchi

tect

s

Students at Start of Record

Not Studentsat Start of Record

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

51%STARTED RECORD AS A STUDENT

PERCENTAGEPOINTS

+2

Half of Newly Licensed Architects Start Record in School Of all architects who earned their initial license in 2019, just over half started their NCARB Record while in school—a two percentage point increase compared to 2018. This proportion has seen steady growth over the past decade, more than doubling from the proportion seen in 2010.

Creating an NCARB Record is considered one of the first steps on the path to licensure because it enables students to begin reporting experience. Growth in the proportion of architects who started their Record in school indicates a better informed student population, and an increased overlap between education, experience, and examination—potentially shortening the time to licensure in future years.

Note: This data can shift as individuals sometimes update their registration information months or years after earning a license.

Page 30: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

|

2020

28

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Year

Perc

ent

of N

CA

RB R

ecor

d H

olde

rs

NAAB-Accredited

Non-Accredited

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

82%GRADUATE FROM ANAAB-ACCREDITEDPROGRAM

PERCENTAGEPOINTS

-2

Most Licensure Candidates Attend NAAB-Accredited Programs Of all licensure candidates who completed the AXP in 2019, 82 percent held a degree from a NAAB-accredited program. This is two percentage points fewer than the percent of candidates who held a degree from a NAAB-accredited program completing the AXP in 2018.

While this percentage has varied only slightly from year to year (the 10-year average is 84 percent), the proportion of candidates who hold a degree from a NAAB-accredited program has been on a slight declining trend since 2015. However, the majority of candidates continue to earn a degree from a NAAB-accredited program in order to complete the education requirement for licensure.

Note: Historical data can shift because licensure candidates can backdate AXP experience up to five years.

Page 31: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

JU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

LICE

NSU

RE

29

Graduates From Non-Accredited Programs Complete the ARE Sooner In 2019, individuals who don’t hold a degree from a NAAB-accredited program finished the national licensing exam approximately four months sooner than individuals who graduated from NAAB-accredited programs.

This is a reversal of the historical trend, which has typically seen graduates from accredited programs complete the exam several months sooner.

Because the majority of candidates hold a degree from a NAAB-accredited program, this shift could be due to the overall increase in time to complete the exam seen in 2019 as a result of low pass rates (see Time to Complete Exam Increases).

0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

2017 20182016201520142013201220112010 2019

Year of ARE Completion

Year

s to

Com

plet

e A

RE

NAAB-Accredited

Non-Accredited

2.3YEARSNAAB-ACCREDITED

2.0YEARSNON-ACCREDITED

Page 32: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

|

2020

30

Graduates From Accredited Programs Have Higher ARE Success RatesAlthough individuals who don’t hold a degree from a NAAB-accredited program finished the ARE sooner than individuals who do hold a degree from a NAAB-accredited program in 2019, graduates of accredited programs continue to perform better on the exam. Graduates from NAAB-accredited programs had an average 54 percent success rate (the average pass rate across all ARE 5.0 divisions), compared to 48 percent for graduates from non-accredited programs.

Historically, candidates from accredited programs outperform their peers by 6 to 9 percentage points. The average ARE 5.0 success rate fell by 2 percentage points in 2019 (see Exam Transition Sees Success Rates Drop).

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Succ

ess

Rate

NAAB-Accredited

Non-Accredited

2017 20182016201520142013201220112010 2019

54%NAAB-ACCREDITED

48%NON-ACCREDITED

Year of ARE Completion

Page 33: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

JU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

LICE

NSU

RE

31

Graduates From Accredited Programs Have Higher ARE Division Pass Rates In 2019, candidates with degrees from NAAB-accredited programs outperformed their peers across all ARE 5.0 divisions. The difference in pass rates was greatest in ARE 5.0’s Programming & Analysis division, with graduates from accredited programs outperforming graduates from non-accredited programs by 10 percentage points. The difference was least noticeable on the Construction & Evaluation division, with graduates from accredited programs performing just 2 percentage points better.

Constru

ction &

Evalu

ation

Practi

ce

Manag

emen

t

Progra

mming &

Ana

lysis

Projec

t Dev

elopmen

t

& Docu

mentat

ion

Projec

t

Manag

emen

t

Projec

t Plan

ning

& Des

ign

0

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pass

Rat

e

NAAB-Accredited

Non-Accredited

Page 34: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

|

2020

32

IPAL Students Across the United States

DrexelUniversity21

students

North CarolinaState University29

students

University of Massachusetts Amherst1

student

Boston Architectural College77

students

Savannah Collegeof Art & Design37

students

Universityof Florida30

students

Florida International University9

students

ClemsonUniversity11

students

University of Cincinnati27

students

University of NorthCarolina at Charlotte8

students

Lawrence Technological University36

studentsPortland State University1

student

University of Southern California90

students

NewSchool of Architecture & Design29

students

WoodburyUniversity25

students

Catholic University of America

New York Institute of TechnologyDeveloping Option

Southern Illinois University

University of KansasDeveloping Option

University of Detroit MercyDeveloping Option

8students 41

students

Active IPAL Program (including number of current students)

Pending NAAB Candidate

Developing IPAL Program

Board Accepts IPAL Graduates

Page 35: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

JU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

LICE

NSU

RE

33

DrexelUniversity21

students

North CarolinaState University29

students

University of Massachusetts Amherst1

student

Boston Architectural College77

students

Savannah Collegeof Art & Design37

students

Universityof Florida30

students

Florida International University9

students

ClemsonUniversity11

students

University of Cincinnati27

students

University of NorthCarolina at Charlotte8

students

Lawrence Technological University36

studentsPortland State University1

student

University of Southern California90

students

NewSchool of Architecture & Design29

students

WoodburyUniversity25

students

Catholic University of America

New York Institute of TechnologyDeveloping Option

Southern Illinois University

University of KansasDeveloping Option

University of Detroit MercyDeveloping Option

8students 41

students

Active IPAL Program (including number of current students)

Pending NAAB Candidate

Developing IPAL Program

Board Accepts IPAL Graduates

Page 36: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

34

Experience

Gaining real-world experience is a long-standing component of the licensure pathway for architects. Designed to guide candidates through earning and reporting the experience needed to practice architecture competently, NCARB’s Architectural Experience Program® (AXP®) is a required component of the licensure process in almost all U.S. jurisdictions.

The number of candidates who completed the AXP fell for the third successive year in 2019, an anticipated adjustment following the peak in 2016.Although 15 percent fewer candidates completed the experience program in 2019 compared to 2018, 2019’s program completions remain above the decade’s average of 5,308.

Candidates continue to earn and record experience earlier, often while in college—a trend NCARB expects to increase in the coming years. On average, candidates who finished the AXP in 2019 took one month longer than those who finished the program in 2018. The slight increase may indicate that time spent completing the experience component of licensure is stabilizing after the initial impact of program updates implemented in 2014-2016.

Page 37: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

average time forsupervisors to approve experience reports

3DAYS

Candidatescompleted the AXP

5,498

-15% change

Candidatesreported experience

24,840

-2% change

29 YEARSAge a candidate

completes the AXP

25 YEARSAge a candidatestarts the AXP

4.4 YEARSIt takes to finish

the program

35

Page 38: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

36

Year

Year

Year

Num

ber o

f A

XP C

ompl

etio

ns

5,498 AXP COMPLETIONS

-15%

0

2K

4K

6K

8K

10K

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

Year

Fewer Candidates Complete Experience ProgramIn 2019, nearly 5,500 candidates completed NCARB’s experience program, which is required for architectural licensure in most U.S. jurisdictions. This is 15 percent fewer than the number of candidates who completed the AXP in 2018.

The decreasing trend seen over the last three years reflects a return toward normal, after a large number of candidates completed the program in 2016-2017 (leaving fewer candidates in the pool to complete the program in the following years). For reference, the number of AXP completions seen in 2019 is slightly above the decade’s average of 5,308.

The number of AXP completions has shifted from year to year over the past decade as program updates and restructures influence candidates’ progress—for instance, nearly 2,400 candidates automatically completed the program when experience areas were realigned in 2016. Additional program updates include removing elective hours ( July 2015) and enabling candidates to earn 50 percent credit for experience more than eight months old ( July 2014).

Note: Historical data can shift because licensure candidates can backdate experience up to five years. For example, if someone submitted a final experience report today containing experience earned in 2017, their AXP completion date would be 2017.

Page 39: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

REEX

PERI

ENCE

37

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

ND

EMO

GRA

PHIC

SN

OM

A &

NCA

RBN

AVIG

ATIN

G

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

INSI

DE

NCA

RB

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

4.4YEARS

+3%

201820172016201520142013201220112010 2019

Year

Year

s to

Com

plet

e A

XP

Time to Complete Experience Increases Slightly The average licensure candidate who completed the AXP in 2019 took 4.4 years, an increase of 3 percent—about one month—compared to 2018. The slight increase seen in 2018 and 2019 suggests that the time spent completing the experience requirement is stabilizing after the initial impact of several program updates.

The time it takes to complete the experience program has remained between 4.1 and 4.4 years since the removal of the program’s elective hours in 2015, which reduced the number of required hours by about a third. Two additional program updates contributed to the overall drop in time to complete the program seen since 2014: allowing candidates to report experience older than six months (2014) and realigning experience areas (2016).

Note: Historical data can shift because licensure candidates can backdate experience up to five years. For example, if someone submitted a final experience report today containing experience earned in 2017, their AXP completion date would be 2017.

Page 40: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

38

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

Year

Age

25.0AVERAGE AGE AT START

29.7AVERAGE AGE AT COMPLETION

Year

Age

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

Age at Experience Completion Decreases Slightly The average candidate beginning the AXP in 2019 was 25 years old—approximately one month younger than the average candidate beginning the program in 2018. Licensure candidates who completed the experience program in 2019 were on average 29.7 years old when they finished, approximately one month younger than those who finished in 2018.

While neither age has shifted dramatically in the past several years, NCARB’s ongoing outreach program to architecture students and the Integrated Path to Architectural Licensure (which allows students to complete the AXP and take the national licensing exam while in school) may encourage candidates to begin earning experience sooner.

Note: Historical data can shift because licensure candidates can backdate experience up to five years. For example, if someone submitted a final experience report today containing experience earned in 2017, their AXP completion date would be 2017.

Page 41: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

REEX

PERI

ENCE

39

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

ND

EMO

GRA

PHIC

SN

OM

A &

NCA

RBN

AVIG

ATIN

G

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

INSI

DE

NCA

RB

Percentage of Candidates Completing Exam Before Experience Rises Slightly Eighteen percent of licensure candidates who completed the path to licensure in 2019 finished the Architect Registration Examination® (ARE®) before they completed their experience—a 1 percentage point increase compared to 2018.

The overall decrease following 2016’s peak at 29 percent (following a steady increase over the previous five years) is likely linked to the alignment of the AXP and ARE. Candidates may now be more likely to choose to complete experience areas before sitting for their corresponding exam divisions.

Note: Historical data can shift because licensure candidates can backdate experience up to five years. For example, if someone submitted a final experience report today containing experience earned in 2017, their AXP completion date would be 2017.

18%OF CANDIDATES COMPLETEAXP AFTER ARE

PERCENTAGE POINT

+1%20172016201520142013201220112010 201920180

10%

20%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

30%

Year

Perc

ent

of L

icen

sure

Can

dida

tes

Page 42: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

40

Day

s to

App

rove 32

AVERAGE DAYS TO REVIEW EXPERIENCE REPORTS

3MEDIAN DAYS TO REVIEW EXPERIENCE REPORTS

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

Year

Most Experience Reports Approved in Three DaysThe majority of experience reports submitted in 2019 (57 percent) were reviewed and approved by a supervisor within three days of the report’s submission. However, the much lengthier times taken in some circumstances drove the mean time for supervisors to review and approve a report in 2019 up to 32 days.

Prior to 2009, all experience was reported via mailed forms. The final day to report experience outside of NCARB’s newly instated six-month reporting requirement was June 30, 2010, which likely caused the spike seen that year.

Note: In the 2019 NCARB by the Numbers, NCARB reported this data based on year of report submission date. In this year’s edition, the chart reflects year of report approval date, a change which allows NCARB to more accurately understand supervisor behavior and causes fewer shifts in historical data.

Page 43: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

REEX

PERI

ENCE

41

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

ND

EMO

GRA

PHIC

SN

OM

A &

NCA

RBN

AVIG

ATIN

G

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

INSI

DE

NCA

RB

Supervisor Demographics Remain UnchangedOf active AXP supervisors in 2019, 19 percent were women, the same proportion seen in 2018. This is 3 percentage points lower than the proportion of NCARB Certificate holders (an approximate representation of licensed architects) who are women, which is 22 percent.

The proportion of AXP supervisors who identified as either non-white or Hispanic did not change, remaining at 12 percent. This is 1 percentage point higher than the proportion of NCARB Certificate holders who are non-white or Hispanic. These data points highlight the ongoing challenge of providing a diverse set of supervisors and mentors to act as leaders and role models in the architecture profession.

6%

2% 1%

3%

88%

Other

White

African American

Asian

Hispanic

19%

81%

Male

Female

SUPERVISOR GENDER SUPERVISOR RACE/ETHNICITY

Page 44: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

42

Examination

Just under 4,000 candidates completed the Architect Registration Examination® (ARE®) in 2019, a 21 percent drop compared to 2018. Required by all 55 U.S. jurisdictions, ARE 5.0 is a six-part exam taken by candidates seeking architectural licensure.

The average candidate took one month longer to finish the exam in 2019 compared to 2018—likely a result of the transition from ARE 4.0 to ARE 5.0. ARE 5.0’s average pass rate fell by 2 percentage points in 2019.

NCARB’s examination experts are constantly evaluating the exam to ensure it remains fair and appropriate.

As candidates continued to test more frequently in ARE 5.0’s strategic divisions—divisions that allow a candidate to complete the exam in fewer divisions when combined with specific ARE 4.0 divisions—and adjust to the new exam format, the number of retakes made up nearly a third of all test administrations in 2019.

Page 45: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

Candidates completed the ARE

3,909 -21%CHANGE

Candidates tested in 2019

18,614 -15%CHANGE

Divisions taken in 2019

45,526

-17% change

were retakes14,234

61%Candidates

overlap the ARE and the AXP

2.3 YEARSAverage time it takes to finish

the exam

29 YEARSAverage age a candidate

starts testing

43

Page 46: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

44

Number of Exam Completions Drops In 2019, just under 4,000 candidates completed the Architect Registration Examination® (ARE®) 5.0, the national exam required for architectural licensure in all 55 U.S. jurisdictions. This is 21 percent fewer than the number of individuals who completed the exam in 2018.

Though a significant drop, 2019’s decline was expected following the well-publicized retirement of the previous version of the exam, ARE 4.0, on June 30, 2018. Without the rush to test caused by the exam transition, the number of candidates completing the ARE each year is expected to return to a level similar to those seen prior to ARE 5.0’s launch in November 2016.

0

0.5K

1K

1.5k

2K

2.5K

3K

3.5K

4K

4.5K

5K

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

Num

ber o

f A

RE C

ompl

etio

ns

Year

3,909

ARE COMPLETIONS

-21%

Page 47: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

REEX

AMIN

ATIO

N

45

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

JU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

Year

Year

s to

Com

plet

e A

RE

2.3YEARS

+6%

Time to Complete Exam IncreasesThe average candidate who completed the ARE in 2019 took 2.3 years, an increase of 6 percent—about one month—compared to candidates who completed the ARE in 2018. This increase was likely caused by multiple factors related to the retirement of ARE 4.0: candidates may feel less pressure to complete the exam post-transition, and the reduction in pass rates seen in conjunction with ARE 4.0’s retirement impacts overall testing timeline. Lower pass rates lead to more retakes, which extends the time it takes to complete the exam requirement.

After failing a division, a candidate must wait 60 days to retake that division, and they can take each division up to three times per 12-month period—a provision that is both necessary for exam security and encourages candidates to properly prepare before testing again. Prior to October 2014, candidates had to wait six months to retake a failed division.

Page 48: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

46

0%

20%

10%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pass

Rat

e by

Div

isio

n

50%47%

57% 55% 56%

70%

49%52% 50%

63%

42%

79%

Constru

ction &

Evalu

ation

Practi

ce M

anag

emen

t

Projec

t Man

agem

ent

Projec

t Plan

ning

& Des

ign

Progra

mming &

Ana

lysis

Projec

t Dev

elopmen

t &

Documen

tation

Construction & Evaluation Has Highest Pass Rate Construction & Evaluation (CE) had the highest pass rate of all ARE 5.0 divisions at 70 percent, and Project Planning & Design (PPD) had the lowest at 42 percent. For comparison, the average success rate across all six divisions was 52 percent.

The passing standard for each division has remained constant since ARE 5.0 launched in 2016.

Note: Pass rates reflect the percent of candidates who successfully receive a passing score on a specific ARE division. Success rates reflect the average pass rate of all ARE divisions.

Page 49: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

REEX

AMIN

ATIO

N

47

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

JU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

Exam Transition Sees ARE Success Rates Drop ARE 5.0 success rates (the average of all division pass rates) fell 2 percentage points between 2018 and 2019. Although historical trends show that ARE success rates typically drop around the launch of a new exam, 2019’s downward trend may indicate that candidates are finding the format of ARE 5.0 more challenging than anticipated or may misunderstand the expected level of knowledge covered in the exam.

This proved especially true for strategic testers, who opted to combine ARE 4.0 and 5.0 divisions and finish testing in as few as five divisions. 2019 saw a continued reduction in pass rates for ARE 5.0’s strategic divisions, leading to the drop in overall success rate. This is the first decline seen in ARE 5.0’s success rate since its launch in November 2016.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Year

Ave

rage

Suc

cess

Rat

e

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

ARE 5.0LAUNCHED

ARE 4.0RETIRED 52%

ARE 5.0SUCCESS RATE

PERCENTAGEPOINTS

-2

ARE 5.0ARE 4.0

Page 50: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

48

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2019201820172016

Year

ARE

5.0

Pas

s Ra

te

Construction & Evaluation

Practice Management

Programming & Analysis

Project Development & Documentation

Project Management

Project Planning & Design

Pass Rates for Strategic Testing Divisions on a Declining TrendAn assessment of ARE 5.0 division pass rates reveals a continued decline in strategic testing divisions, which impacted the overall exam success rate. Strategic divisions are those which, when combined with strategic ARE 4.0 divisions, enabled candidates to complete the ARE in as few as five tests.

ARE 5.0’s strategic testing divisions each saw the following drop in pass rates: Programming & Analysis (PA) fell by 1 percentage point, Project Planning & Design (PPD) by 4 percentage points, and Project Development & Documentation (PDD) by 3 percentage points. Of the remaining three divisions, Construction & Evaluation (CE) saw no change, while Project Management (PjM) increased 1 percentage point and Practice Management (PcM) fell 2 percentage points.

NCARB’s staff, expert volunteers, and testing consultants continuously evaluate ARE 5.0 results to ensure that the exam is fair, valid, and measures an appropriate level of competency.

Page 51: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

REEX

AMIN

ATIO

N

49

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

JU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

Pass Rates for Retakes The average pass rate for all ARE 5.0 divisions is higher for first attempts than it is for retakes— divisions administered after a candidate fails their first attempt on the same division.

The largest difference in pass rates for retakes compared to first attempts was seen on the Construction & Evaluation division, which saw an 11 percentage point decrease in average pass rates.

The smallest difference in pass rates was seen on the Practice Management and Project Planning & Design divisions, each of which saw a 3 percentage point decrease in average pass rates following the first attempt. Interestingly, these proved to be the hardest divisions to pass on the first attempt.

0%

20%

10%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pass

Rat

e by

Div

isio

n

50%47%

57% 55% 56%

72%

61%

50%47%

56%

44%

53%

46%

64%

56%

43%40%

79%

Constru

ction &

Evalu

ation

Practi

ce M

anag

emen

t

Projec

t Man

agem

ent

Projec

t Plan

ning

& Des

ign

Progra

mming &

Ana

lysis

Projec

t Dev

elopmen

t &

Documen

tation

First Attempt Pass Rate

Retake Pass Rate

Page 52: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

50

201820172016201520142013201220112010 2019

0

10K

20K

30K

40K

50K

60K

Year

Num

ber o

f A

RE D

ivis

ions

45,526

Retake 4.0

First Attempt 5.0

Retake 5.0

First Attempt 4.0

DIVISIONS -17%

Number of Tests Decreases Following ARE 4.0’s Retirement The total number of tests administered fell in 2019, as candidates took a total of 45,526 divisions—a 17 percent drop compared to 2018. Reasons for the decrease could include fewer candidates in the testing pool after the record number of exam completions in 2017, and less pressure to test following ARE 4.0’s retirement in 2018 (an anticipated result of the exam transition).

Over two-thirds (31,292) of the tests administered in 2019 were first-time attempts. The remaining third (14,234) were retakes—divisions administered after a candidate fails their first attempt on the same division.

Page 53: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

REEX

AMIN

ATIO

N

51

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

JU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

Project Planning & Design Has Highest Administrations Of the 45,526 ARE 5.0 tests administered in 2019, nearly 10,000 of them were for the Project Planning & Design division—including 5,270 first attempts and 4,562 retakes. Practice Management saw the largest number of first attempts, with 6,766 candidates taking this division for the first time in 2019.

Construction & Evaluation had the fewest administrations in 2019, its distinction from the other divisions influenced by high pass rates that limited the number of retakes necessary.

0

6K

4K

2K

8K

10K

12K

Num

ber o

f D

ivis

ions

Adm

inis

tere

d

Constru

ction

& Evalu

ation

Practi

ce

Manag

emen

t

Progra

mming

& Ana

lysis

Projec

t

Develo

pment &

Documen

tation Pro

ject

Manag

ment

Projec

t Plan

ning

& Des

ign

First Attempts

Retakes

710

4,052

2,362

6,7662,002

5,078

1,429

5,187

4,562

5,270

3,169

4,939

Page 54: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

52

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

Year

Perc

ent

of L

icen

sure

Can

dida

tes

61%OF CANDIDATES COMBINE AXP AND ARE

PERCENTAGEPOINTS

-2

Most Candidates Overlap the AXP and ARE Of the licensure candidates who completed the ARE in 2019, 61 percent took at least one division while completing their experience. This is a 2 percentage point decrease compared to 2018, and marks the third year of decline in a row. The drop could be a result of the alignment between the AXP and ARE, which could encourage candidates to defer testing until they’ve completed the related experience.

Currently, 52 of the 55 licensing boards allow candidates to overlap gaining experience with taking the ARE.

Page 55: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

REEX

AMIN

ATIO

N

53

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

JU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

ARE Success Rates Increase With AXP ExperienceCandidates’ average ARE success rates increase as they get closer to completing the experience program, and peak shortly after completing the experience area.

This indicates that beginning the ARE before earning a significant amount of professional experience will decrease a candidate’s likelihood to pass. While most candidates overlap the AXP and ARE at some point during their licensure process, the vast majority of ARE divisions are administered after a candidate has completed the required hours for the experience program area.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Percent AXP Complete

Pass

Rat

e 54%SUCCESS RATEAT AXP COMPLETION

Page 56: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

54

Year

Age

32.3AVERAGE AGE AT COMPLETION

29.3AVERAGE AGE AT START

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

ARE Success Rates Highest While Completing AXPCandidates who take the exam shortly before completing the experience program tend to have the highest ARE success rates. With the coordination between the six realigned experience areas and ARE 5.0’s six divisions, the higher pass rates near the culmination of the experience program suggest an overlap in subject-matter expertise is beneficial to candidates. Plus, candidates invested in wrapping up the AXP may be more focused on completing the path to licensure.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

3210

ARE

Suc

cess

Rat

e

Years After AXP Completion

64%57% 53%

50%

Page 57: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

REEX

AMIN

ATIO

N

55

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

JU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

Year

Age

32.3AVERAGE AGE AT COMPLETION

29.3AVERAGE AGE AT START

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

Age at ARE Completion Decreases SlightlyOn average, licensure candidates who began the ARE in 2019 were 29.3 when they started testing, and licensure candidates who completed the ARE in 2019 were 32.3 when they finished testing—a two-month decrease compared to candidates who finished testing in 2018.

While the ages candidates start and finish the ARE have not shifted dramatically, these two points have gradually decreased over the last decade: candidates are now a year younger when they start and finish the ARE than they were in 2010.

Page 58: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

Demographics

Gender representation and racial and ethnic diversity both increased in 2019 at several key stages on the path to licensure. An area of progress for both metrics was the proportion of candidates completing the experience program in 2019.

Early on the path, near-gender parity was maintained, with women accounting for 49 percent of individuals starting the experience program. There was also continued improvements in gender representation along many later career stages, including candidates completing core licensure requirements and becoming NCARB Certificate holders.

Racial and ethnic diversity also increased across most career stages, including a 3 percentage point jump in people of color completing the AXP and a 4 percentage point increase in people of color starting the ARE. However, this growth is largely restricted to the Asian and Hispanic/Latino population, with no change seen in the proportion of African American individuals in the profession.

While women and people of color remain underrepresented within the profession, this year’s data suggests that the gradual improvements in early career stages are starting to impact post-licensure career stages—a signal that the profession may be changing, if slowly.

56

Page 59: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

In the last 10 years, racial and ethnic diversity has improved 16%

for candidates finishing experience

LESS THAN 1 IN 5new architects identify as

a racial or ethnic minority

NEARLY 2 IN 5new architects are women

Over half of new female NCARB Record holders are people of color

Women completelicensure requirements

1.3 YEARSsooner than men

49% of candidates

starting the AXP are women

44% of candidates

starting the AXP are people of color

57

Page 60: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| J

UN

E 20

16

58N

CARB

BY

THE

NU

MBE

RS |

202

0 58

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Perc

ent

by G

ende

r

Women

Men

New N

CARBB

Reco

rd Holders

AXP Star

t

ARE St

art

AXP Complet

e

ARE Complet

eCore

Requir

emen

ts

Complete

New N

CARB

Certific

ate H

oldersNCARB

Certific

ate

Holders

22%+1%

35%0%

38%+1%

39%0%

42%+2%

43%-1%

49%-1%

46%+1%

Gender Representation Improves at Several Career StagesGender equity improved or held steady at most career stages in 2019, although slight decreases were seen in the proportion of women starting the experience and examination programs. The largest increase was seen in the proportion of women who completed the AXP in 2019, which increased 2 percentage points in comparison to 2018.

NCARB is not currently seeing equal proportions of men and women any career stage, as was seen in the cohort of candidates starting the experience program in 2018. However, the continued growth in the proportion of women at later career stages, including finishing all core licensure requirements (now 38 percent) and holding an NCARB Certificate (now 22 percent) indicates that although women remain underrepresented in the profession, the gap continues to close.

Note: NCARB recognizes that not all individuals identify as male or female. However, NCARB’s data currently uses the same sex categorization as the U.S. Census Bureau.

Page 61: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

59

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

JU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

Year

Perc

ent

of A

XP C

ompl

etio

ns

Women

Men

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

42%PROPORTION OFAXP COMPLETIONSBY WOMEN

PERCENTAGEPOINTS

+2

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Proportion of Female Candidates Completing Experience IncreasesThe proportion of women who completed the AXP increased by two percentage points in 2019; women made up 42 percent of this cohort in 2019. This was the largest increase seen at any individual career stage in 2019, and the first improvement in gender representation at the point of AXP completion since 2016.

Gender representation in candidates finishing the experience program has increased 7 percentage points over the past decade. In 2010, women made up 35 percent of this group. Plus, with equitable or near-equitable proportions of men and women starting the experience program in 2018 and 2019, the proportion of women completing the AXP should continue to increase over the next several years (on average, it takes 4.4 years to complete the AXP).

Note: Historical data can shift because licensure candidates can backdate experience up to five years. NCARB recognizes that not all individuals identify as male or female. However, NCARB’s data currently uses the same sex categorization as the U.S. Census Bureau.

Page 62: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| J

UN

E 20

16

60N

CARB

BY

THE

NU

MBE

RS |

202

0 60

Year

Perc

ent

of A

RE C

ompl

etio

ns

Women

Men

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

39%PROPORTION OFARE COMPLETIONSBY WOMEN

PERCENTAGEPOINTS

0

Proportion of ARE Completions by Women Holds Steady Women made up 39 percent of candidates completing the ARE in 2019, the same proportion seen in 2018 and the highest proportion on record.

Gender representation in candidates finishing the exam has increased 6 percentage points over the past decade. In 2010, women made up 33 percent of this group. NCARB expects to see further improvements in gender representation in the coming years, as increases in the proportion of women starting the path to licensure move down the pipeline.

Note: NCARB recognizes that not all individuals identify as male or female. However, NCARB’s data currently uses the same sex categorization as the U.S. Census Bureau.

Page 63: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

61

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

JU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

Year

Year

s to

Com

plet

e C

ore

Requ

irem

ents

13.2YEARS

11.9YEARS

Women

Men

Women Complete Requirements Sooner On average, women consistently complete their education, experience, and examination requirements sooner than their male peers. In 2019, women finished the core licensure requirements in an average of 11.9 years, compared to 13.2 years for men and 12.7 years for all candidates.

The difference in time to complete requirements between these genders has steadily widened in recent years. The average female candidate who completed the licensure process in 2019 did so two months sooner than those in 2018. Meanwhile, the average male candidate who completed the licensure process in 2019 did so just one month sooner than the average male candidate in 2018.

Note: NCARB recognizes that not all individuals identify as male or female. However, NCARB’s data currently uses the same sex categorization as the U.S. Census Bureau.

Page 64: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| J

UN

E 20

16

62N

CARB

BY

THE

NU

MBE

RS |

202

0 62

Perc

ent

White/Hispanic or Latino

Other/Hispanic or Latino

Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/Not Hispanic or Latino

Asian/Not Hispanic or Latino

Black or African American/Not Hispanic or Latino

Other/Not Hispanic or Latino

White/Not Hispanic or Latino

Black or African American, Hispanic or Latino

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

New Re

cord

Holders

AXP Star

t

AXP Complet

e

ARE St

art

ARE Complet

eCore

Requir

emen

ts

Complete

New N

CARB

Certific

ateHolders

NCARB Cert

ificate

Holders

Racial and Ethnic Diversity Increases at Most Career Stages Racial and ethnic diversity increased at nearly every career stage in 2019, with the most growth being seen in the proportion of people of color who completed the experience program and began the examination. Thirty-seven percent of candidates who completed the AXP and 39 percent of those beginning the ARE in 2019 identified as non-white or Hispanic, increasing 4 percentage points each.

In 2019, the proportion of individuals who identify as non-white or Hispanic completing core requirements and becoming new NCARB Certificate holders both increased by 2 percentage points.

The majority of the growth in racial and ethnic representation at each career stage has been seen in the Hispanic/Latino and Asian populations. No increase was seen in the proportion of Black or African American individuals in the profession at any career stage. While the consistent growth in racial and ethnic diversity seen over the past several years indicates improvements in representation are slowly working down the licensure pipeline, the deeper demographic breakdown highlights that this is not equal for each race or ethnicity.

Note: NCARB uses the same categories for race and ethnicity as the U.S. Census Bureau.

Page 65: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

63

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

JU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

Women in the Profession More Diverse Than Men The proportion of women who identify as a racial or ethnic minority is higher than the proportion of men who identify as a racial or ethnic minority at every career stage. The key area of difference is in the Asian demographic—at any given career stage, the proportion of women who identify as Asian is 4 to 10 percentage points higher than the proportion of men who identify as Asian at the same stage.

Over half of women who started an NCARB Record in 2019 identified as a racial or ethnic minority, with 22 percent of new female Record holders identifying as Asian.

Note: NCARB uses the same categories for race and ethnicity as the U.S. Census Bureau.

Perc

ent

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

White/Hispanic or Latino

Other/Hispanic or Latino

Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/Not Hispanic or Latino

Asian/Not Hispanic or Latino

Black or African American/Not Hispanic or Latino

Other/Not Hispanic or Latino

White/Not Hispanic or Latino

Black or African American, Hispanic or Latino

New Re

cord H

olders

AXP Star

t

AXP Complet

e

ARE St

art

ARE Complet

eCore

Requir

emen

ts

Complete

New N

CARB

Certific

ate H

oldersNCARB

Certific

ate

Holders

Page 66: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| J

UN

E 20

16

64N

CARB

BY

THE

NU

MBE

RS |

202

0 64

Perc

ent

White/Hispanic or Latino

Other/Hispanic or Latino

Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/Not Hispanic or Latino

Asian/Not Hispanic or Latino

Black or African American/Not Hispanic or Latino

Other/Not Hispanic or Latino

White/Not Hispanic or Latino

Black or African American, Hispanic or Latino

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

New Re

cord

Holders

AXP Star

t

ARE St

art

AXP Complet

e

ARE Complet

eCore

Requir

emen

ts

Complete

New N

CARB

Certific

ate H

oldersNCARB

Certific

ate

Holders

Proportion of African American Men Higher Than African American Women Although the proportion of men who identify as a racial or ethnic minority is lower than the proportion of women at each career stage, the proportion of men who identify as Black or African American is larger than the proportion of women—especially in early career stages.

Six percent of new male NCARB Record holders and 5 percent of men beginning the AXP identified as Black or African American, compared to 4 percent of women at each stage.

When compared with data from the joint NOMA and NCARB survey conducted in 2019, which highlighted disproportionate impediments for women of color in architecture, this suggests that there may be additional barriers preventing African American women from progressing in the profession.

Note: NCARB uses the same categories for race and ethnicity as the U.S. Census Bureau.

Page 67: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

65

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

JU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

Perc

ent

of A

XP C

ompl

etio

ns

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Year

White/Hispanic or Latino

Other/Hispanic or Latino

Asian/Not Hispanic or Latino

Black or African American/Not Hispanic or Latino

Other/Not Hispanic or Latino

White/Not Hispanic or Latino

63%

6%4%

7%3%

17%

Diversity Continues to Improve at Experience Completion The proportion of individuals completing the AXP who identify as non-white or Hispanic has reached a record high at 37 percent—4 percentage points higher than in 2018 and 16 higher than in 2010. The growth since 2018 was primarily seen in the proportion of Asian and Hispanic/Latino candidates, which increased by 2 and 1 percentage points, respectively.

The proportion of people of color who complete the experience component has been steadily increasing since 2014, pointing toward future improvements in the representation of non-white individuals who are practicing architects.

Note: NCARB uses the same categories for race and ethnicity as the U.S. Census Bureau.

Page 68: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| J

UN

E 20

16

66N

CARB

BY

THE

NU

MBE

RS |

202

0 66

Growth in Diversity Slows at ARE Completion The proportion of individuals completing the ARE in 2019 who identify as people of color was 21 percent, unchanged compared to 2018 and only a 3 percentage point improvement compared to the racial and ethnic representation seen a decade ago.

Racial and ethnic diversity has been much slower to grow in this cohort than in AXP completions (which has seen a 16 percentage point improvement over the decade). While the disparity between white and non-white or Hispanic candidates has been gradually decreasing in other areas, this shift has not yet impacted the ARE.

Note: NCARB uses the same categories for race and ethnicity as the U.S. Census Bureau.

Year

Perc

ent

of A

RE C

ompl

etio

ns

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

White/Hispanic or Latino

Other/Hispanic or Latino

Asian/Not Hispanic or Latino

Black or African American/Not Hispanic or Latino

Other/Not Hispanic or Latino

White/Not Hispanic or Latino

79%

2%

4%1%

2%

12%

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

Page 69: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

67

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

JU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

2019201820172016

Year

Year

s to

Com

plet

e C

ore

Requ

irem

ents

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

17

16

11 YEARS

14.5 YEARS

12.6 YEARS12.8 YEARS

10.5 YEARS

Asian

Black or African American

Other

White

White, Hispanic or Latino

Latino Candidates Complete Licensure Requirements Soonest On average, Hispanic or Latino candidates consistently complete their education, experience, and examination requirements sooner than their peers. In 2019, Latino candidates finished the core licensure requirements in an average of 10.5 years, 2.2 years sooner than the overall average.

Candidates who identify as Black or African American took an average of 14.5 years to finish the licensure process—1.8 years longer than the overall average.

For comparison, Asian candidates took an average of 11 years, individuals who indicated their race/ethnicity as “other” took an average of 12.6 years, and white candidates took an average of 12.8 years.

Note: NCARB did not have sufficient demographic data to show the average time to licensure by race/ethnicity beyond 2016, or for candidates who identify as Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander or Native American/Alaskan Native.

Page 70: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| J

UN

E 20

16

68N

CARB

BY

THE

NU

MBE

RS |

202

0 68

600+ 100+ 75+

10+ 3+ 1 - 2

Record Holders Around the World Licensure candidates and NCARB Certificate holders are located in countries across the globe. Outside of the United States, the largest population of Record holders are based in Canada (739), the United Kingdom (102), the Republic of Korea (95), and China (87)—these numbers have not shifted much over the past several years.

Through mutual recognition arrangements, NCARB Certificate holders can pursue reciprocal licenses in Australia, Canada, Mexico, and New Zealand. In 2019, NCARB also added new international testing locations. The exam is now offered at Prometric test centers throughout the United States and Canada, as well as Australia, Argentina, Brazil, England, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Spain, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates.

Page 71: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

69

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

JU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

Page 72: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

|

2020

70

Navigating the Path

70

Assessing when and why candidates stop pursuing a license is a crucial part of understanding the impact licensure requirements—specifically NCARB’s programs—have on emerging professionals in the architecture field. In addition, comparing the progress of different demographic groups allows NCARB to identify pinch points throughout the process of becoming an architect and examine how program adjustments might combat inequity in the profession.

By 2019, 38 percent of candidates who started the licensure path a decade ago had stopped pursuing a license, with 62 percent having completed, or still working on their licensure requirements—a slight improvement compared to the proportion of attrition seen in 2018.

Since 2012, the proportion of women who continue their pursuit of licensure has been equal to, or has surpassed, their male counterparts. The opposite is true for candidates who are people of color; on average, non-white candidates are 31 percent more likely to stop pursuing a license than their white peers.

Most candidates fall off the path while working to gain and report experience. Many candidates who stop pursuing a license are likely to continue working in the architecture industry, and could decide to resume the licensure process in the future. NCARB’s data shows that 57 percent of candidates who finished the licensure path in 2019 never fell off the path, and 31 percent returned within the first two years.

Page 73: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

71

NAV

IGAT

ING

TH

E PA

THPU

BLIC

EDU

CATI

ON

EXAM

INAT

ION

EXPE

RIEN

CED

EMO

GRA

PHIC

SN

OM

A &

NCA

RBJU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

71

candidates have stayed on the path to licensure

3 5OUTOF

OVER 10YEARS

non-white candidates are

31%to fall o� the path to licensure

MORELIKELY

women are now

4%to stay on the path than men

MORELIKELY

57%of candidates

never leave the path

54% leave the path

while reporting experience

Page 74: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

|

2020

72

Over 10 Years, Two Out of Five Candidates Stop Pursuing Licensure

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Years Since Record Creation

Perc

ent

Y-1Y-2Y-3Y-4Y-5Y-6Y-7Y-8Y-9Y-10

0%

38%-1

28%-1

28%+3

28%+2 25%

025%

+425%

+718%

0

31%-5

Page 75: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

73

NAV

IGAT

ING

TH

E PA

THPU

BLIC

EDU

CATI

ON

EXAM

INAT

ION

EXPE

RIEN

CED

EMO

GRA

PHIC

SN

OM

A &

NCA

RBJU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

Of candidates who created an NCARB Record 10 years ago (Y-10), 38 percent are currently not working toward earning a license—suggesting that two out of every five candidates are likely to stop pursuing licensure over the course of a decade. Many of these candidates likely continue to work in the architecture industry, and could decide to resume the licensure process in the future.

2019’s attrition rate at the 10-year mark (candidates who started in 2010) is one percentage point below the rate of attrition seen after a decade in 2018. In addition, the percentage of candidates who started a Record in 2011 and have since left the licensure path is 5 percentage points below the rate seen for candidates at the nine-year mark in 2018. These small differences could indicate that recent programmatic changes are encouraging more candidates to stay on, and complete, the licensure process. Increases in attrition for candidates three and four years after starting their NCARB Record may be a result of ARE 4.0’s retirement or other recent program changes.

The data shows that 25 percent of candidates leave the licensure path within the first three years after creating a Record, only increasing by 13 percentage points over the next seven years—indicating that the majority of candidate attrition is seen soon after beginning the licensure process.

By nature, candidates who started their NCARB Record in 2019 are all still active.0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Years Since Record Creation

Perc

ent

Y-1Y-2Y-3Y-4Y-5Y-6Y-7Y-8Y-9Y-10

0%

38%-1

28%-1

28%+3

28%+2 25%

025%

+425%

+718%

0

31%-5

Page 76: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

|

2020

74

Women Now More Likely to Maintain Licensure Goals

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Years Since Record Creation

Perc

ent

Women

Y-10

Men Y-10

Women

Y-9

Men Y-9

Women

Y-8

Men Y-8

Women

Y-7

Men Y-7

Women

Y-6

Men Y-6

Women

Y-5

Men Y-5

Women

Y-4

Men Y-4

Women

Y-3

Men Y-3

Women

Y-2

Men Y-2

Women

Y-1

Men Y-1

37%-1

39%-1

30%-5

31%-6 29%

027%

-3

28%+2

27%+2

28%+2

26%+1

25%-1

25%+2

26%+5 23%

+2

26%+8 23%

+4 18%-1

17%-1

0% 0%

Page 77: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

75

NAV

IGAT

ING

TH

E PA

THPU

BLIC

EDU

CATI

ON

EXAM

INAT

ION

EXPE

RIEN

CED

EMO

GRA

PHIC

SN

OM

A &

NCA

RBJU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

Prior to 2012, women stopped pursuing licensure at higher rates than men. However, women who started their NCARB Record in 2012 and onward reversed this trend. Of women who began the licensure process in 2012 (Y-8), 27 percent have since become inactive— 2 percentage points fewer than their male counterparts.

This trend continues from 2013-2018, with women maintaining their focus on earning a license at equal or higher rates than men—including up to 3 percentage points lower attrition rates for women who started their NCARB Record in 2016 and 2017. The average female candidate who started an NCARB Record in the past decade is 4 percent less likely to stop pursuing licensure than the average male candidate.

While studies—including NCARB’s 2020 joint survey with the National Organization of Minority Architects (NOMA)—and NCARB’s demographic data show that there continues to be disparity between men and women in the profession, lower rates of female attrition on the path to licensure should help address this historical imbalance over time.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Years Since Record Creation

Perc

ent

Women

Y-10

Men Y-10

Women

Y-9

Men Y-9

Women

Y-8

Men Y-8

Women

Y-7

Men Y-7

Women

Y-6

Men Y-6

Women

Y-5

Men Y-5

Women

Y-4

Men Y-4

Women

Y-3

Men Y-3

Women

Y-2

Men Y-2

Women

Y-1

Men Y-1

37%-1

39%-1

30%-5

31%-6 29%

027%

-3

28%+2

27%+2

28%+2

26%+1

25%-1

25%+2

26%+5 23%

+2

26%+8 23%

+4 18%-1

17%-1

0% 0%

Page 78: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

|

2020

76

People of Color More Likely to Stop Pursuing a License

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Years Since Record Creation

Perc

ent

People

of Color Y

-10

Whit

e Y-10

People

of Color Y

-9

Whit

e Y-9

People

of Color Y

-8

Whit

e Y-8

People

of Color Y

-7

Whit

e Y-7

People

of Color Y

-6

Whit

e Y-6

People

of Color Y

-5

Whit

e Y-5

People

of Color Y

-4

Whit

e Y-4

People

of Color Y

-3

Whit

e Y-3

People

of Color Y

-2

Whit

e Y-2

People

of Color Y

-1

Whit

e Y-1

34%-2

43%-1

27%-5

39%-3

25%-1

34%-3

24%+1

33%-1

23%0

33%+2

23%+2

29%-1

22%+4

28%+3

22%+6

28%+8

16%0

18%+3

0% 0%

18%16%

Page 79: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

77

NAV

IGAT

ING

TH

E PA

THPU

BLIC

EDU

CATI

ON

EXAM

INAT

ION

EXPE

RIEN

CED

EMO

GRA

PHIC

SN

OM

A &

NCA

RBJU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

The average candidate of color who started an NCARB Record in the past decade is 31 percent more likely to stop pursuing licensure than the average white candidate.

Although NCARB’s demographics data indicates that representation in the profession is increasing slowly along most career stages, candidates who identify as non-white or Hispanic experience higher rates of attrition. This trend appears largely unchanged compared to previous years.

Forty-three percent of candidates of color who started an NCARB Record in 2010 (Y-10) have since stopped making active progress toward earning a license, compared to 34 percent of their white counterparts—a 9 percentage point difference. This is 1 percentage point wider than seen in the previous year’s data set, suggesting that the cause of this disparity is not being effectively addressed.

Combined with findings from NCARB’s 2020 joint survey with NOMA and NCARB’s own demographic information, this stark difference in attrition rates highlights the need to identify and remove barriers in the architecture profession and licensure pathway that disproportionally impact the career progression of minority candidates.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Years Since Record Creation

Perc

ent

People

of Color Y

-10

Whit

e Y-10

People

of Color Y

-9

Whit

e Y-9

People

of Color Y

-8

Whit

e Y-8

People

of Color Y

-7

Whit

e Y-7

People

of Color Y

-6

Whit

e Y-6

People

of Color Y

-5

Whit

e Y-5

People

of Color Y

-4

Whit

e Y-4

People

of Color Y

-3

Whit

e Y-3

People

of Color Y

-2

Whit

e Y-2

People

of Color Y

-1

Whit

e Y-1

34%-2

43%-1

27%-5

39%-3

25%-1

34%-3

24%+1

33%-1

23%0

33%+2

23%+2

29%-1

22%+4

28%+3

22%+6

28%+8

16%0

18%+3

0% 0%

18%16%

Page 80: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

|

2020

78

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

109876543210

Perc

ent

Years O the Path

57%

21%

10%4%

3% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%

Most Candidates Who Earn a License Remain Active Throughout the Licensure PathOf candidates who finished their final core requirement in 2019, 57 percent spent less than a year not actively working toward licensure.

Twenty-one percent of candidates who finished the licensure process in 2019 spent approximately one year inactive, and another 10 percent spent two years inactive. The remaining 12 percent of candidates who finished their core requirements in 2019 spent between three and 10 years inactive.

Together, this data indicates that the majority of candidates who finish the licensure process demonstrate ongoing active work toward finishing the AXP and ARE. It also suggests that returning to the licensure process may be smoother within the first few years of falling off the path.

Page 81: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

79

NAV

IGAT

ING

TH

E PA

THPU

BLIC

EDU

CATI

ON

EXAM

INAT

ION

EXPE

RIEN

CED

EMO

GRA

PHIC

SN

OM

A &

NCA

RBJU

RISD

ICTI

ON

SIN

SID

E N

CARB

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

109876543210

Perc

ent

Years O the Path

57%

21%

10%4%

3% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%

Inactive Candidates Most Likely to Stop Pursuing Licensure While Earning Experience Candidates who stop pursuing licensure are most likely to become inactive while reporting experience toward the AXP—whether solely reporting experience or reporting experience while testing.

Thirty-two percent of candidates who stopped pursuing licensure in 2019 were working toward completing the experience program (a 3 percentage point increase compared to 2018), and 6 percent were both reporting experience and testing (a 1 percentage point increase compared to 2018).

Sixteen percent of candidates who fell off the path in 2019 were testing and had finished the AXP, a 3 percentage point increase compared to 2018 that is likely due to the impact of ARE 4.0’s retirement.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

Perc

ent

NCARB Done

AXP Complete, ARE Started

AXP Complete, ARE Not Started

AXP in Progress, ARE Complete

AXP and ARE in Progress

AXP Not Started, ARE in Progress

AXP Not Started, ARE Complete

Graduated, Neither AXP Nor ARE in Progress

AXP in Progress, ARE Not Started

Nothing Started

Year

Page 82: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCARB/NOMA Joint Survey

It’s essential that the path to becoming an architect is fair and equitable, and that the individuals who work in the architecture profession reflect the communities they serve.

In 2020, NCARB partnered with the National Organization of Minority Architects (NOMA) to conduct a joint survey exploring candidates’ experiences while pursuing licensure, to assess whether there are impediments and pinch points that disproportionally affect minorities and other underrepresented groups.

The survey was sent to nearly 70,000 professionals, and received over 5,000 complete responses from licensure candidates, recently licensed architects, and individuals who stopped pursuing licensure. Over 2,300 of the responses were from people of color, and nearly 2,500 were from women.

The results suggest there is often slight, but widespread, disparity throughout the licensure process and in firm culture. While all people of color—especially women of color—are impacted by these disparities in some ways, African Americans report challenges at nearly every stage. In addition, the results revealed significant hurdles for older candidates pursuing the AXP, and highlighted ways the ARE may pose a more significant obstacle for women than for men.

Over the coming months, NOMA and NCARB will continue to analyze the survey results and release in-depth reports on key topic areas, including the AXP, ARE, and firm culture. As the findings are shared, NCARB and NOMA will determine next steps and propose solutions to address these disparities.

80

Page 83: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

Women are twice as likely as men to stop pursuing

licensure after takingan ARE division

African Americans are 5 percentage

points less likely than their white peersto agree finding a

supportive firm is easy

People of color are 7 percentage points

more likely than their white peers to stop pursuing licensure

while working in a firm

66%don’t see themselves reflected in firm leadership

OF AFRICANAMERICANS52%

agree finding a supportive firm is easy–compared to 78% of individuals aged 18-29

OF INDIVIDUALSAGED 55+

81

Page 84: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

82

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Perc

ent

N/A

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

White Black or AfricanAmerican

Hispanic orLatino

Asian Other

11%

14%

72%

13%

17%

67%

13%

17%

68%

10%

18%

71%

20%

16%

62%

AFRICAN AMERICANS

PERCENTAGE POINTS LESS LIKELY TO AGREE THAN THEIR WHITE PEERS

5

African Americans Slightly Less Likely to Say Finding an AXP-Supportive Firm is EasyBecause the Architectural Experience Program® (AXP®) requires experience to be gained across six different areas, finding a firm willing to provide work opportunities in each practice area is critical to completing the program.

Most survey respondents—nearly three quarters—agreed that finding a firm to support their progress through the AXP was easy. However, licensure candidates and architects who identified as Black or African American were 5 percentage points less likely to agree than their white peers, and 4 percentage points less likely to agree than their Asian peers.

While this is a minor difference, difficulty in African American candidates’ ability to find a supportive firm could draw out the time and effort needed to complete the experience program, potentially extending the licensure process and contributing to attrition on the licensure path.

Note: “Other” includes individuals who identified as a race/ethnicity other than white; Black or African American; Hispanic or Latino; or Asian, as well as those who wrote in an alternative response for their race/ethnicity.

Page 85: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

83

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

JO

INT

SURV

EYN

AVIG

ATIN

G

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

INSI

DE

NCA

RB

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Perc

ent

White Black or AfricanAmerican

Hispanic orLatino

Asian Other

N/A

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

6%

14%

77%

8%

14%

75%

6%

16%

75%

6%

15%

77%

9%

17%

73%

AFRICAN AMERICANS AND LATINOS

PERCENTAGE POINTS LESS LIKELY TO AGREE THAN THEIR WHITE AND ASIAN PEERS

2

White and Asian Candidates Most Likely to Agree AXP Supervisor Is SupportiveAXP supervisors play an important role in candidates’ path to licensure by providing guidance, assigning experience opportunities, and reviewing experience reports.

At 77 percent, individuals who identified as White or Asian were the most likely to agree. Licensure candidates and architects who identified as Black or African American and Latino were slightly less likely to agree at 75 percent.

Though the percentage point difference is minor, the slight gap between African Americans and Latinos compared to their peers of other races/ethnicities is indicative of small but cumulative disparities for African American and Latino individuals throughout the survey results.

Note: “Other” includes individuals who identified as a race/ethnicity other than white; Black or African American; Hispanic or Latino; or Asian, as well as those who wrote in an alternative response for their race/ethnicity.

Page 86: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

84

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Perc

ent

WhiteMen

WhiteWomen

Black or African

AmericanMen

Black or African

AmericanWomen

Hispanic orLatino Men

MEN WOMEN

Hispanicor LatinaWomen

AsianMen

AsianWomen

N/A

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

ASIAN WOMEN

PERCENTAGE POINTS LESS LIKELY TO AGREE THAN WHITE MEN

3

20172016201520142013201220112010

14%

15%

70%

15%

11%

73%

14%

14%

71%

13%

16%

71%

13%

14%

73%

16%

13%

70%

14%

17%

68%

18%

15%

67%

Asian and Latina Women Less Likely to Receive Variety of Experience OpportunitiesTo complete the AXP, candidates must learn how to competently perform 96 key tasks spread across six experience areas. It is essential that firms offer individuals pursuing licensure a variety of work opportunities so they are able to gain the required experience.

While nearly three quarters of candidates agreed their firm provided them with a variety of opportunities to gain credit in all experience areas, breaking the responses down by race/ethnicity and gender revealed small disparities. At 67 and 68 percent (respectively), Asian and Hispanic or Latina women were the least likely to agree. This is 2 and 3 percentage points lower than white men and 5 and 6 percentage points (respectively) lower than white women and African American men, who were the most likely to agree they received a variety of opportunities.

White respondents were the only race/ethnicity where women were more likely to agree than men. For each other race/ethnicity, women were at least 3 percentage points less likely to agree that they received a variety of opportunities compared to the corresponding male respondents of the same race/ethnicity.

This suggests that earning the broad experience needed to earn an architecture license may be more difficult for women of color, specifically Asian and Latina women.

Page 87: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

85

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

JO

INT

SURV

EYN

AVIG

ATIN

G

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

INSI

DE

NCA

RB

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Perc

ent

N/A

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

18-29 Years 30-39 Years 40-54 Years 55+ Years

INDIVIDUALS 55+

PERCENTAGE POINTS LESS LIKELY TO AGREE THAN THOSE 18-29

26

9%

12%

78%

14%

16%

69%

16%

23%

58%

22%

21%

52%

Reported Ease of Finding AXP-Supportive Firm Decreases With AgeWhile the joint survey conducted by NOMA and NCARB is primarily exploring disparities based on race/ethnicity and gender, the results also highlighted other factors that may impact an individual’s career progression, such as age.

Breaking down results based on respondents’ ages revealed a large gap in areas related to the AXP. Just 52 percent of individuals aged 55 or older agreed that finding a firm to support their AXP progress was easy—26 percentage points less than individuals aged 18-29.

The percent of individuals who agree that finding a supportive firm is easy decreases with each age group, with those aged 30-39 9 percentage points less likely to agree than those aged 18-29, and individuals aged 40-54 20 percentage points less likely to agree.

These results indicate that despite efforts to create additional pathways to licensure, gaining the experience needed to earn a license is disproportionately difficult for older candidates.

Page 88: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

86

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Perc

ent

Yes

Somewhat

No

White Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

Asian Other

LATINOS

PERCENTAGE POINTS LESS LIKELY TO FEEL THEY CAN AFFORD THEY ARE THAN THEIR WHITE PEERS

5

27%

38%35%

28%

41%

31%

22%

38% 40%

25%

39%36%

22%

40% 38%

Latinos Least Likely to Feel Confident They Can Afford the ARENCARB’s current version of the exam, ARE 5.0, costs $235 per division. To complete the exam, candidates must pass all six divisions.

When asked whether they feel confident in their ability to afford taking the ARE, just 22 percent of Hispanic or Latino respondents said yes—6 percentage points fewer than Black or African American respondents.

For most races/ethnicities, the largest proportion of respondents selected “somewhat.” Hispanic or Latino respondents represent the only ethnicity where candidates were slightly more likely to select “no” when asked if they were confident in their ability to afford taking the ARE.

Many survey respondents across all demographics indicated the cost of the exam was a significant challenge to practice; however, this barrier may disproportionately impact Latino candidates.

Note: “Other” includes individuals who identified as a race/ethnicity other than white; Black or African American; Hispanic or Latino; or Asian, as well as those who wrote in an alternative response for their race/ethnicity.

Page 89: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

87

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

JO

INT

SURV

EYN

AVIG

ATIN

G

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

INSI

DE

NCA

RB

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Perc

ent

White Black or AfricanAmerican

Hispanic orLatino

Asian Other

LATINOS

PERCENTAGE POINTS LESS LIKELY TO RECEIVE FIRM SUPPORT THAN THEIR WHITE AND ASIAN PEERS

950%43% 41%

50%

38%

Latino and African American Candidates Least Likely to Receive Firm Support Toward Cost of the ARE Some architecture firms assist candidates in managing the financial burden of licensure by paying for the cost of the exam—although many respondents indicate this financial assistance is only available if they pass the ARE division.

However, just 41 percent of Latino candidates and 43 percent of African American candidates indicated that their firm would contribute to the cost of the ARE—9 and 7 percentage points (respectively) below their white and Asian peers.

This suggests that white and Asian candidates may receive better access to firm support while pursuing licensure.

Note: “Other” includes individuals who identified as a race/ethnicity other than white; Black or African American; Hispanic or Latino; or Asian, as well as those who wrote in an alternative response for their race/ethnicity.

Page 90: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

88

Latinos and African American Women More Likely to Spend Over $500 on Study MaterialsIn addition to the cost of scheduling an exam appointment, many candidates purchase study materials.

When asked roughly how much they had spent on study materials, 48 percent of Latina women and 45 percent of Latino men indicated they had spent over $500, 11 and 8 percentage points higher (respectively) than their white male peers. African American women were the next most likely to spend over $500 on study materials, with 43 percent selecting this option—6 percentage points higher than white men.

With Latino and African American candidates already among the least likely to receive firm support toward the cost of the ARE, this is an additional expense that could contribute to candidates’ inability to afford the exam.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Perc

ent

WhiteMen

Black or African

AmericanMen

Hispanic or Latino

Men

MEN WOMEN

AsianMen

WhiteWomen

Black or African

AmericanWomen

Hispanicor LatinaWomen

AsianWomen

0-$100

$100-$300

$300-$500

Over $500

LATINA WOMEN

PERCENTAGE POINTS MORE LIKELY TO SPEND OVER $500 ON STUDY MATERIALS THAN THEIR WHITE MALE PEERS

11

Page 91: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

89

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

JO

INT

SURV

EYN

AVIG

ATIN

G

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

INSI

DE

NCA

RB

Women Twice as Likely to Stop Pursuing a License After Taking ARE DivisionIn addition to licensure candidates and recently licensed architects, the survey was also shared with individuals who decided to stop pursuing an architecture license.

When asked at what point in their career they decided not to become an architect, 26 percent of women no longer pursuing licensure selected “after taking an ARE division.” This is 13 percentage points higher than their male peers.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Perc

ent

Men Women

13%26%

WOMEN

PERCENTAGE POINTS MORE LIKELY TO STOP PURSUING A LICENSE AFTER TAKING AN ARE DIVISION THAN THEIR MALE PEERS

13

Page 92: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

90

African Americans Less Likely to Agree They Are Fairly Compensated Compared to PeersIn addition to exploring respondents’ experiences navigating the licensure process, the survey also examined firm culture and career development.

At 53 percent, white respondents were the most likely to agree they feel compensated fairly compared to their peers. Comparatively, just 45 percent of Black or African American respondents and 47 percent of Asian respondents agreed to the same statement—8 and 6 percentage points fewer, respectively.

Note: “Other” includes individuals who identified as a race/ethnicity other than white; Black or African American; Hispanic or Latino; or Asian, as well as those who wrote in an alternative response for their race/ethnicity.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Perc

ent

N/A

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

White Black or AfricanAmerican

Hispanic orLatino

Asian Other

22%

23%

53%

28%

24%

45%

24%

26%

48%

23%

29%

47%

29%

27%

42%

AFRICAN AMERICANS

PERCENTAGE POINTS LESS LIKELY TO AGREE THEY ARE FAIRLY COMPENSATED THAN THEIR WHITE PEERS

8

Page 93: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

91

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

JO

INT

SURV

EYN

AVIG

ATIN

G

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

INSI

DE

NCA

RB

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Perc

ent

Yes

No

Unsure

White Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

Asian Other

65%

26%

9%

29%

66%

5%

44%48%

8%

41%

47%

12%

48%44%

8%

AFRICAN AMERICANS

PERCENTAGE POINTS POINTS LESS LIKELY TO BE ABLE TO IDENTIFY SOMEONE SIMILAR TO THEMSELVES IN FIRM LEADERSHIP THAN THEIR WHITE PEERS

40

Two-Thirds of African Americans Cannot Identify People Similar to Themselves in Firm LeadershipRepresentation in firm leadership is an important component of firm culture, and has been shown to lead to benefits such as higher employee retention and higher financial performance, among others.

When asked if they could identify people in leadership at their firm who are similar to themselves, two-thirds of African American respondents indicated they could not—40 percentage points higher than white respondents. In addition, Latino and Asian respondents were 22 and 21 percentage points (respectively) more likely to indicate they could not identify people similar to themselves in firm leadership, compared to their white peers.

Note: “Other” includes individuals who identified as a race/ethnicity other than white; Black or African American;Hispanic or Latino; or Asian, as well as those who wrote in an alternative response for their race/ethnicity.

Page 94: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

92

African Americans Most Likely to Face or Witness Discrimination at Work When asked if they had faced or witnessed discrimination in their work environment, 40 percent of African Americans said yes—14 percentage points higher than their white counterparts. Asians were the next most likely to report they had faced or witnessed discrimination at work, with 28 percent selecting yes—still 12 percentage points fewer than African Americans.

This statistic highlights the disparity in the profession, even among underrepresented groups.

Note: “Other” includes individuals who identified as a race/ethnicity other than white; Black or African American; Hispanic or Latino; or Asian, as well as those who wrote in an alternative response for their race/ethnicity.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Perc

ent

Yes

No

Unsure

White Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

Asian Other

26%

65%

9%

40%43%

17%

26%

59%

15%

28%

55%

17%

35%

56%

9%

AFRICAN AMERICANS

PERCENTAGE POINTS MORE LIKELY TO SAY THEY HAVE FACED OR WITNESSED DISCRIMINATION THAN THEIR WHITE PEERS

14

Page 95: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

93

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

JO

INT

SURV

EYN

AVIG

ATIN

G

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

INSI

DE

NCA

RB

People of Color More Likely to Stop Pursuing Licensure While Working at a FirmWhen asked at what point in their career they decided not to become an architect, 50 percent of people of color who are no longer pursuing licensure selected “while working in an architecture firm.” This is 7 percentage points higher than their white peers, suggesting that people of color are more likely to fall off the path to licensure due to experiences at a firm.

Given the cumulative disparities apparent in the experiences of people of color at various points throughout the licensure process when compared to their white peers—in gaining experience, receiving firm support while taking the ARE, and in firm culture—the higher level of attrition is both understandable, and potentially preventable. These findings highlight the need for culture and systematic shifts throughout the profession.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Perc

ent

White People of Color

50%43%

PEOPLE OF COLOR

PERCENTAGE POINTS MORE LIKELY TO STOP PURSUING A LICENSE AFTER WORKING IN A FIRM THAN THEIR WHITE PEERS

7

Page 96: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

Inside NCARB

94

With over 116,000 Record holders, more than 400 licensing board members, over 400 volunteers helping shape our programs and initiatives, and nearly 21,000 active AXP supervisors, NCARB’s community is larger and more robust than ever. In 2019, our volunteers—including architects, licensure candidates, educators, and experts from other professions—worked across 44 committees to write exam questions, explore the future of architecture, develop resources for licensing boards, and more.

With 55 architectural licensing boards in the United States, each with their own rules and requirements, NCARB works to provide board support, encourage program alignment, and assist individuals seeking licensure. Of the 433 members who serve on these boards, 224 are practicing architects, 132 are in related professions (such as engineering and landscape architecture), and 77 ensure the public consumer has a voice on the board.

Page 97: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

20,777 active AXP supervisors

419Volunteers

433Member

Board Members

NCARB

+1% change

NCARB Record holders

116,501

38,287candidates actively

working toward licensure

25,568candidates notactively testing

or reporting hours

NCARB Certificate holders

46,7215,925non-certified

architects

95

Page 98: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

96

0

10K

5K

20K

15K

30K

35K

25K

40K

45K

50K

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

Year

Num

ber o

f N

CA

RB C

ertifi

cate

Hol

ders

46,721CERTIFICATEHOLDERS

+ 3%

Number of NCARB Certificate Holders Continues to RiseIn 2019, over 46,000 architects held an active NCARB Certificate—an increase of 3 percent from 2018 and a new record high. The number of Certificate holders has been steadily increasing since 2014.

Because the NCARB Certificate’s primary goal is to facilitate reciprocal licensure across the United States, the growing demand for the Certificate could be a sign that mobility in the profession is increasingly necessary. The rise in Certificate holders is likely also a result of the growing number of architects in the United States.

In addition to simplifying the process of earning additional licenses in U.S. jurisdictions, the NCARB Certificate enables U.S. architects to earn licenses in Australia, Canada, Mexico, and New Zealand. Certified architects have access to free continuing education opportunities through NCARB’s newly renamed Continuum Education Program.

Page 99: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

97

INSI

DE

NCA

RBPU

BLIC

EDU

CATI

ON

EXAM

INAT

ION

EXPE

RIEN

CED

EMO

GRA

PHIC

SN

OM

A &

NCA

RBN

AVIG

ATIN

G

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

NCARB’s Community Continues to GrowIn 2019, over 116,000 individuals held an active NCARB Record, a 1 percent growth compared to 2018. Of those Record holders, 40 percent are architects with an NCARB Certificate (a 1 percentage point increase compared to 2018), 5 percent are architects without a Certificate (no change from 2018), and 33 percent are candidates actively working toward licensure (a 3 percentage point decrease compared to 2018). The remaining 22 percent are candidates who haven’t taken a division of the ARE or reported AXP hours in the last year (up 1 percentage point from 2018).

46,721NCARB

Certificate Holders

5,925Non-Certified

Architects

25,568Candidates Not

Testing/ReportingHours

22%

38,287Candidates Actively

Working TowardLicensure

33%

40%

5%

116,501NCARB RECORD HOLDERS

+1%

Page 100: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

98

Number of New Record Holders Dips SlightlyNearly 8,500 individuals started an NCARB Record in 2019, 1 percent fewer than the number who started a Record in 2018. While this number has been on a shallow decline since 2015, it has remained close to 8,500 for the past three years—a potential indicator that new Record applications have reached a new level of “normal.”

For reference, the average number of new Record holders per year over the past decade is 8,325.

1K

2K

3K

4K

5K

6K

7K

8K

9K

10K

11K

2019201820172016201520142013201220112010

Year

New

Rec

ord

Hol

ders

8,422NCARB RECORD HOLDERS

-1%

Page 101: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

99

INSI

DE

NCA

RBPU

BLIC

EDU

CATI

ON

EXAM

INAT

ION

EXPE

RIEN

CED

EMO

GRA

PHIC

SN

OM

A &

NCA

RBN

AVIG

ATIN

G

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

NCARB Volunteers

30%women

70%men

77Public members

433 Member Board Members

55 Member Boards

100Charges

44Committees

27,795Hours volunteers

419 NCARB Volunteers

25Architecture boards

30Multi-professional boards

132 Members fromother professions

224Architect members

Page 102: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

100

JurisdictionsThe following section includes baseline comparisons for NCARB’s 55 Member Boards, which include all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Each page includes a 2019 snapshot of the jurisdiction’s experience program completion rate, examination success rate, number of licenses, and completion time for the experience program and examination.

Page 103: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

101

Completion Timeline

AXP

ARE

YEARS

8 6420

4.4 Years

2.3 Years

Exam Success Rate

52%Success Rate

Experience Completion Rate

Licensure46%

Resident Licenses

54%Reciprocal Licenses

22+7822%Completion Rate

Proportion of participants who completed the AXP

in 2019

46+544,616Licenses per Jurisdiction

Page 104: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

55 Jurisdictions

Alabama ...................................................................................................... 98

Alaska ............................................................................................................ 99

Arizona ....................................................................................................... 100

Arkansas .................................................................................................... 101

California ................................................................................................ 102

Colorado ................................................................................................. 103

Connecticut ....................................................................................... 104

Delaware .................................................................................................. 105

District of Columbia .............................................................. 106

Florida ......................................................................................................... 107

Georgia ...................................................................................................... 108

Guam ............................................................................................................ 109

Hawaii ........................................................................................................... 110

Idaho ................................................................................................................ 111

Illinois ............................................................................................................ 112

Indiana .......................................................................................................... 113

Iowa ................................................................................................................. 114

Kansas ............................................................................................................ 115

Kentucky .................................................................................................. 116

Louisiana ................................................................................................... 117

Maine ............................................................................................................ 118

Maryland .................................................................................................. 119

Massachusetts ................................................................................ 120

Michigan .................................................................................................... 121

Minnesota .............................................................................................. 122

Mississippi .............................................................................................. 123

Missouri ..................................................................................................... 124

Montana .................................................................................................... 125

102

Page 105: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

Nebraska ................................................................................................. 126

Nevada ........................................................................................................ 127

New Hampshire ............................................................................. 128

New Jersey ............................................................................................ 129

New Mexico ........................................................................................ 130

New York .................................................................................................. 131

North Carolina ................................................................................ 132

North Dakota .................................................................................... 133

Northern Mariana Islands .............................................. 134

Ohio ................................................................................................................ 135

Oklahoma .............................................................................................. 136

Oregon ........................................................................................................ 137

Pennsylvania ....................................................................................... 138

Puerto Rico .......................................................................................... 139

Rhode Island ...................................................................................... 140

South Carolina ................................................................................. 141

South Dakota ..................................................................................... 142

Tennessee ............................................................................................... 143

Texas .............................................................................................................. 144

Utah ............................................................................................................... 145

Vermont ................................................................................................... 146

U.S. Virgin Islands ...................................................................... 147

Virginia ....................................................................................................... 148

Washington ......................................................................................... 149

West Virginia ..................................................................................... 150

Wisconsin ................................................................................................. 151

Wyoming .................................................................................................. 152

103

Page 106: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

104

15+85EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

123Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

19Completions

Alabama

15%Completion Rate

136Active Testers

16Completions

215Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

YEARS6420

AXP

ARE

5.1 yrs

1.7 yrs

59%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

National Average: 22%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

29%Resident Licenses

71%Reciprocal Licenses29+712,939

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 107: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

105

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

Alaska

0+100EXPERIENCE

14 Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

0Completions

0%Completion Rate

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

4.8 yrs

4.5 yrs

YEARS6420

National Average: 53%

National Average: 22%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

43%Resident Licenses

57%Reciprocal Licenses43+57550

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

EXAMINATION

52%Success Rate

14Active Testers

2Completions

25Divisions Taken

National Average: 52%

N/A

Page 108: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

106

Arizona

21+79424Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

90Completions

21%Completion Rate

492Active Testers

48Completions

724Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

YEARS6420

AXP

ARE

4.4 yrs

2.3 yrs

47%Success Rate

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

38%Resident Licenses

62%Reciprocal Licenses38+625,999

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

National Average: 22%

Page 109: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

107

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

7+93Arkansas

81Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

6Completions

7%Completion Rate

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

4.8 yrs

2.5 yrs

YEARS

National Average: 53%

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

32%Resident Licenses

68%Reciprocal Licenses32+681,712

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

6420

National Average: 22% 81Active Testers

8Completions

131Divisions Taken

51%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

Page 110: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

108

California

18+825,098 Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

915Completions

18%Completion Rate

6,204Active Testers

446Completions

7,688Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

YEARS6420

AXP

ARE

4.8 yrs

3.8 yrs

44%Success Rate

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

81%Resident Licenses

19%Reciprocal Licenses81+1921,528

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

National Average: 22%

Page 111: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

109

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

638Active Testers

38Completions

1,033Divisions Taken

Colorado

48%Success Rate20+80657

Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

132Completions

20%Completion Rate

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

4.7 yrs

2.3 yrs

YEARS6420

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

National Average: 52%

National Average: 22%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

47%Resident Licenses

53%Reciprocal Licenses47+537,804

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 112: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

110

Connecticut

32+6874Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

24Completions

32%Completion Rate

140Active Testers

10Completions

220Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

YEARS6420

AXP

ARE

5.2 yrs

2.7 yrs

61%Success Rate

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

33%Resident Licenses

67%Reciprocal Licenses33+674,295

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

National Average: 22%

Page 113: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

111

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

14Active Testers

0Completions

11Divisions Taken

Delaware

43+577Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

3Completions

43%Completion Rate

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

9 yrs

N/A

YEARS106 8420

36%Success Rate

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

National Average: 52%

National Average: 22%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

8%Resident Licenses

92%Reciprocal Licenses8+921,734

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 114: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

112

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

District of Columbia

21+79466Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

100Completions

21%Completion Rate

575Active Testers

42Completions

896Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

YEARS6420

AXP

ARE

4.8 yrs

2.5 yrs

49%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

22%Resident Licenses

78%Reciprocal Licenses22+783,947

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

National Average: 22%

Page 115: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

113

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

37%Success Rate

1,490Active Testers

68Completions

2,095Divisions Taken

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

Florida

17+831,086Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

181Completions

17%Completion Rate

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

4.3 yrs

3.9 yrs

YEARS6420

National Average: 52%

National Average: 22%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

50%Resident Licenses

50%Reciprocal Licenses50+5010,917

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 116: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

114

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

Georgia

14+86478Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

65Completions

14%Completion Rate

533Active Testers

25Completions

751Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

YEARS6420

AXP

ARE

4.9 yrs

3.2 yrs

43%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

44%Resident Licenses

56%Reciprocal Licenses44+565,845

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

National Average: 22%

Page 117: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

115

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

13%Success Rate

14Active Testers

0Completions

16Divisions Taken

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

Guam

0+1008 Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

0Completions

0%Completion Rate

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

N/A

N/A

YEARS6420

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

30%Resident Licenses

70%Reciprocal Licenses30+7099

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

National Average: 22%

Page 118: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

116

Hawaii

14+86133 Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

19Completions

14%Completion Rate

164Active Testers

12Completions

240Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

5.3 yrs

4 yrs

44%Success Rate

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

41%Resident Licenses

59%Reciprocal Licenses41+592,586

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

6YEARS

420

National Average: 22%

Page 119: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

21+79

LICE

NSU

RE

117

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

6420

54%Success Rate

106Active Testers

10Completions

177Divisions Taken

Idaho

104Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

22Completions

21%Completion Rate

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

5.8 yrs

2.8 yrs

YEARS6420

27+73National Averages:

Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

27%Resident Licenses

73%Reciprocal Licenses

1,969Total Licenses

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

National Average: 52%

National Average: 22%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

Page 120: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

118

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

Illinois

19+811,040Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

195Completions

19%Completion Rate

1,116 Active Testers

123Completions

1,768Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

YEARS6420

AXP

ARE

4.8 yrs

2.3 yrs

55%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

60%Resident Licenses

40%Reciprocal Licenses60+4010,057

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

National Average: 22%

Page 121: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

119

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

126Active Testers

6Completions

173Divisions Taken

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

Indiana

10+90162Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

17Completions

10%Completion Rate

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

4.8 yrs

1 yrs

YEARS

57%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

6420

National Average: 22%

31%Resident Licenses

69%Reciprocal Licenses31+693,319

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 122: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

120

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

Iowa

10+90118Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

12Completions

10%Completion Rate

104Active Testers

6Completions

139Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

YEARS6420

AXP

ARE

4.7 yrs

1.8 yrs

60%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

29%Resident Licenses

71%Reciprocal Licenses29+712,194

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

National Average: 22%

Page 123: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

121

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

140Active Testers

13Completions

193Divisions Taken

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

Kansas

12+88132Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

16Completions

12%Completion Rate

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

4.8 yrs

2.8 yrs

YEARS6420

55%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

National Average: 22%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

30%Resident Licenses

70%Reciprocal Licenses30+702,823

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 124: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

122

Kentucky

14+8673Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

10Completions

14%Completion Rate

121Active Testers

6Completions

169Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

YEARS6420

AXP

ARE

4.6 yrs

4.8 yrs

56%Success Rate

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

27%Resident Licenses

73%Reciprocal Licenses27+732,697

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

National Average: 22%

Page 125: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

123

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

242Active Testers

8Completions

287Divisions Taken

Louisiana

16+84195Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

32Completions

16%Completion Rate

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

4.8 yrs

2.4 yrs

YEARS6420

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

49%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

National Average: 22%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

39%Resident Licenses

61%Reciprocal Licenses39+613,612

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 126: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

124

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

Maine

17+8358Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

10Completions

17%Completion Rate

73Active Testers

2Completions

89Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

YEARS6420

AXP

ARE

3.9 yrs

2 yrs

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

29%Resident Licenses

71%Reciprocal Licenses29+711,715

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

49%Success Rate

National Average: 22%

Page 127: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

125

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

489Active Testers

46Completions

681Divisions Taken

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

Maryland

19+81500Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

94Completions

19%Completion Rate

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

5.1 yrs

2.5 yrs

YEARS6420

52%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

National Average: 22%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

43%Resident Licenses

57%Reciprocal Licenses43+576,464

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 128: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

126

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

Massachusetts

17+83970Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

168Completions

17%Completion Rate

1,163Active Testers

115Completions

1,907Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

YEARS6420

AXP

ARE

4.8 yrs

2.6 yrs

55%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

54%Resident Licenses

46%Reciprocal Licenses54+467,646

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

National Average: 22%

Page 129: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

127

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

362Active Testers

11Completions

458Divisions Taken

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

Michigan

16+84398Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

64Completions

16%Completion Rate

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

4.5 yrs

2.2 yrs

YEARS6420

50%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

National Average: 22%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

43%Resident Licenses

57%Reciprocal Licenses43+575,294

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 130: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

128

Minnesota

14+86353Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

48Completions

14%Completion Rate

344Active Testers

37Completions

507Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

YEARS6420

AXP

ARE

5.2 yrs

2.4 yrs

61%Success Rate

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

54%Resident Licenses

46%Reciprocal Licenses54+463,876

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

National Average: 22%

Page 131: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

129

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

57Active Testers

7Completions

77Divisions Taken

Mississippi

9+9144Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

4Completions

9%Completion Rate

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

4 yrs

2.1 yrs

YEARS6420

45%Success Rate

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

National Average: 52%

21%Resident Licenses

79%Reciprocal Licenses21+791,699

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

National Average: 22%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

Page 132: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

130

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

Missouri

14+86378Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

52Completions

14%Completion Rate

450Active Testers

32Completions

599Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

YEARS6420

AXP

ARE

5.6 yrs

3 yrs

52%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

39%Resident Licenses

61%Reciprocal Licenses39+615,208

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

National Average: 22%

Page 133: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

131

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

85Active Testers

3Completions

122Divisions Taken

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

Montana

25+7585Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

21Completions

25%Completion Rate

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

5.2 yrs

1 yrs

YEARS6420

63%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

National Average: 22%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

31%Resident Licenses

69%Reciprocal Licenses31+691,564

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 134: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

132

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

Nebraska

11+89100Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

11Completions

11%Completion Rate

66Active Testers

2Completions

89Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

YEARS

AXP

ARE

4.3 yrs

2.5 yrs

55%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

6420

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

31%Resident Licenses

69%Reciprocal Licenses31+691,862

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

National Average: 22%

Page 135: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

133

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

123Active Testers

4Completions

189Divisions Taken

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

Nevada

12+88114Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

14Completions

12%Completion Rate

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

5.6 yrs

2 yrs

YEARS6420

37%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

National Average: 22%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

20%Resident Licenses

80%Reciprocal Licenses20+802,878

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 136: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

134

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

New Hampshire

26+7439Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

10Completions

26%Completion Rate

40Active Testers

5Completions

67Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

YEARS

AXP

ARE

5.9 yrs

2.4 yrs

67%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

6420

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

17%Resident Licenses

83%Reciprocal Licenses17+831,829

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

National Average: 22%

Page 137: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

135

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

328Active Testers

17Completions

406Divisions Taken

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

New Jersey

19+81225Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

43Completions

19%Completion Rate

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

4.9 yrs

1.8 yrs

YEARS6420

51%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

National Average: 22%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

40%Resident Licenses

60%Reciprocal Licenses40+607,618

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 138: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

136

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

New Mexico

15+85106Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

16Completions

15%Completion Rate

91Active Testers

7Completions

124Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

6.3 yrs

1.6 yrs

52%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

YEARS 6420

33%Resident Licenses

67%Reciprocal Licenses33+672,198

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

National Average: 22%

Page 139: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

137

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

4,535Active Testers

431Completions

7,058Divisions Taken

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

New York

20+804,103Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

810Completions

20%Completion Rate

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

4.6 yrs

2.5 yrs

YEARS6420

48%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

National Average: 22%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

58%Resident Licenses

42%Reciprocal Licenses58+4220,102

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 140: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

138

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

North Carolina

16+84396Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

65Completions

16%Completion Rate

387Active Testers

22Completions

658Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

YEARS6420

AXP

ARE

4.6 yrs

2.3 yrs

56%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

42%Resident Licenses

58%Reciprocal Licenses42+586,400

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

National Average: 22%

Page 141: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

139

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

51Active Testers

8Completions

72Divisions Taken

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

North Dakota

12+8841Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

5Completions

12%Completion Rate

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

3.8 yrs

3.6 yrs

YEARS6420

57%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

National Average: 22%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

16%Resident Licenses

84%Reciprocal Licenses16+841,167

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 142: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

140

Northern Mariana Islands

0+1000Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

0Completions

N/ACompletion Rate

0Active Testers

0Completions

0Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

N/A

N/A

N/ASuccess Rate

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

18%Resident Licenses

82%Reciprocal Licenses18+8239

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

YEARS6420

National Average: 22%

Page 143: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

141

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

Ohio

15+85489Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

74Completions

15%Completion Rate

442Active Testers

53Completions

660Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

5.1 yrs

2.8 yrs

64%Success Rate

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

National Average: 52%

6420

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

YEARS

National Average: 22%

51%Resident Licenses

49%Reciprocal Licenses51+496,305

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 144: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

142

182Active Testers

10Completions

239Divisions Taken

Oklahoma

20+80148Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

29Completions

20%Completion Rate

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

4.8 yrs

2.5 yrs

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

51%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

35%Resident Licenses

65%Reciprocal Licenses35+652,361

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

YEARS6420

National Average: 22%

Page 145: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

143

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

Oregon

15+85384Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

58Completions

15%Completion Rate

340Active Testers

26Completions

424Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

6420

AXP

ARE

5.3 yrs

2.7 yrs

62%Success Rate

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

National Average: 52%

YEARS

National Average: 22%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

41%Resident Licenses

59%Reciprocal Licenses41+593,716

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 146: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

144

741Active Testers

43Completions

1,096Divisions Taken

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

Pennsylvania

16+84774Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

122Completions

16%Completion Rate

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

4.6 yrs

2.8 yrs

48%Resident Licenses

52%Reciprocal Licenses48+528,571

Total Licenses

53%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

YEARS6420

National Average: 22%

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 147: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

145

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

Puerto Rico

11+89199Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

21Completions

11%Completion Rate

278Active Testers

4Completions

227Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

6420

AXP

ARE

5.1 yrs

3.5 yrs

23%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

92%Resident Licenses

8%Reciprocal Licenses92+81,153

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

YEARS

National Average: 22%

Page 148: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

146

Rhode Island

17+8359Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

10Completions

17%Completion Rate

67Active Testers

3Completions

92Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

4.9 yrs

2 yrs

YEARS6420

52%Success Rate

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

18%Resident Licenses

82%Reciprocal Licenses18+821,828

Total Licenses

National Average: 22%

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 149: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

147

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

South Carolina

15+85125Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

19Completions

15%Completion Rate

131Active Testers

7Completions

209Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

6 yrs

2 yrs

53%Success Rate

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

National Average: 52%

6420

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

YEARS

National Average: 22%

27%Resident Licenses

73%Reciprocal Licenses27+734,210

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 150: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

148

1211109876543210

South Dakota

9+9135Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

3Completions

9%Completion Rate

14Active Testers

1Completion

25Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

10.3 yrs

2 yrs

YEARS

56%Success Rate

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

13%Resident Licenses

87%Reciprocal Licenses13+87957

Total Licenses

National Average: 22%

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 151: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

149

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

Tennessee

20+80295Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

60Completions

20%Completion Rate

264Active Testers

30Completions

447Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

60%Success Rate

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

National Average: 52%

AXP

ARE

4.8 yrs

1.9 yrs

6420

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

YEARS

National Average: 22%

24%Resident Licenses

76%Reciprocal Licenses24+7610,184

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 152: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

150

Texas

16+841,988Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

314Completions

16%Completion Rate

2,163 Active Testers

92Completions

3,169Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

4.7 yrs

3.4 yrs

YEARS6420

42%Success Rate

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

63%Resident Licenses

37%Reciprocal Licenses63+3713,558

Total Licenses

National Average: 22%

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 153: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

151

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

Utah

16+84150Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

24Completions

16%Completion Rate

148Active Testers

8Completions

261Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

6420

AXP

ARE

4.2 yrs

3 yrs

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

48%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

YEARS

National Average: 22%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

45%Resident Licenses

55%Reciprocal Licenses45+552,861

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 154: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

152

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.2 years

Vermont

22+7827Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

6Completions

22%Completion Rate

62Active Testers

5Completions

99Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

8.5 yrs

1.2 yrs

YEARS

60%Success Rate

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

National Average: 52%

96 7 83 4 51 20

26%Resident Licenses

74%Reciprocal Licenses26+741,216

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

National Average: 22%

Page 155: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

153

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

U.S. Virgin Islands

0+1001Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

N/ACompletions

N/ACompletion Rate

1Active Testers

33Completions

N/ADivisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

N/A

N/ASuccess Rate

N/A

6420

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

15%Resident Licenses

85%Reciprocal Licenses15+851,111

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

YEARS

National Average: 22%

Page 156: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

154

Virginia

14+86274Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

38Completions

14%Completion Rate

288Active Testers

33Completions

421Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

6.2 yrs

2.8 yrs

58%Success Rate

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

YEARS 6420

39%Resident Licenses

61%Reciprocal Licenses39+617,493

Total Licenses

National Average: 22%

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 157: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

155

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

Washington

21+79880Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

183Completions

21%Completion Rate

802Active Testers

108Completions

1,299Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

6420

AXP

ARE

63%Success Rate

5.1 yrs

2.4 yrs

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

National Average: 52%

YEARS

National Average: 22%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

62%Resident Licenses

38%Reciprocal Licenses62+386,823

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 158: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

156

West Virginia

0+10010Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

0Completions

0%Completion Rate

16Active Testers

0Completions

11Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

YEARS6420

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

45%Success Rate

National Average: 52%

N/A

N/A

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

9%Resident Licenses

91%Reciprocal Licenses9+911,295

Total Licenses

National Average: 22%

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 159: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

157

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

Wisconsin

22+78747Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

168Completions

22%Completion Rate

780Active Testers

77Completions

1,231Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

6420

AXP

ARE

54%Success Rate

5 yrs

3 yrs

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

National Average: 52%

YEARS

National Average: 22%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

33%Resident Licenses

67%Reciprocal Licenses33+674,839

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

Page 160: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

NCA

RB B

Y TH

E N

UM

BERS

| 2

020

158

Wyoming

20+8010Licensure Candidates Reporting Hours

2 Completions

20%Completion Rate

18 Active Testers

7Completions

30Divisions Taken

LICENSURECOMPLETION TIMELINE

AXP

ARE

6.5 yrs

2.1 yrs

80%Success Rate

EXPERIENCE EXAMINATION

National Average: 52%

National Average: 2.3 years

National Average: 4.4 years

YEARS 6420

11%Resident Licenses

89%Reciprocal Licenses11+891,215

Total Licenses

National Averages:Resident46%

Reciprocal 54%

National Average: 22%

Page 161: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

LICE

NSU

RE

159

JURI

SDIC

TIO

NS

PUBL

ICED

UCA

TIO

NEX

AMIN

ATIO

NEX

PERI

ENCE

DEM

OG

RAPH

ICS

NO

MA

& N

CARB

NAV

IGAT

ING

IN

SID

E N

CARB

Page 162: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

About This ReportThis report is based on data collected by the National Council of Architectural Registration Boards (NCARB) during the 2019 calendar year, providing insight on the path to licensure.

NCARB maintains a database on licensure candidates and Certificate holders. This allows us to track the progression of candidates as they move through the AXP, ARE, and beyond.

Some of the data is self-reported, including age, race, and geographic location. Other data is triggered by candidate actions such as starting the AXP or completing the ARE. NCARB also collects data from the U.S. jurisdictional licensing boards to provide a total count of architects.

Other data sources used in this report are noted as appropriate and include:

• Data from the National Architectural Accrediting Board (NAAB) was also used in this report to provide the number of students entering and graduating from NAAB-accredited programs.

• Data from a study conducted by Benenson Strategy Group (BSG) was used in the “Public Perception of Licensure” section of this report.

• Data from a joint survey conducted by NCARB and NOMA was used in the “NCARB and NOMA” section of this report.

160

Page 163: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

About NCARBNCARB is a global leader in architectural regulation; our members are the architectural licensing boards of the 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

We are dedicated to helping our Member Boards protect the public health, safety, and welfare by recommending and encouraging national requirements for architectural licensure and mobility—including the Architectural Experience Program® (AXP®), Architect Registration Examination® (ARE®), and NCARB Certificate. The Certificate facilitates reciprocal licensure across the United States, Australia, Canada, Mexico, and New Zealand.

For more information visit www.ncarb.org

Join the conversation on social media:

www.facebook.com/ncarb

www.twitter.com/ncarb

www.instagram.com/ncarb

161

Page 164: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

GlossaryAge: Median age based on self-reported dates of birth.

AXP: The Architectural Experience Program® (AXP®) provides a framework to guide licensure candidates through earning and recording professional experience.

AXP Completion: This data point is triggered when a licensure candidate fulfills the AXP’s requirements and their Record has been evaluated by NCARB.

ARE: Developed by NCARB, the Architect Registration Examination® (ARE®) is used to assess a candidate’s knowledge and skills, and is required for initial licensure in all U.S. jurisdictions.

ARE/Exam Candidate: An NCARB Record holder who is currently taking the ARE.

ARE Completion: This data point is triggered when an exam candidate passes all ARE divisions.

Core Requirements for Licensure: The core requirements for licensure in the United States include gaining an education (typically a degree from a NAAB-accredited program), completing the AXP, and passing the ARE. Some jurisdictions have additional requirements that fall outside this “core,” such as a supplemental exam.

Core Requirements Complete: This data point is triggered when a licensure candidate completes their final core requirement, whether that is the AXP or the ARE.

Early Eligibility: The ability to take the ARE before completing the AXP. Fifty-two of the 55 jurisdictions currently allow this overlap.

162

Page 165: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

Licensure Candidate: An NCARB Record holder who is actively documenting experience and/or taking the ARE.

NAAB: The National Architectural Accrediting Board (NAAB) accredits U.S. professional programs in architecture. All U.S. jurisdictions accept degrees from NAAB-accredited programs for initial licensure.

New Record: A candidate’s successful application for an NCARB Record, which is often the first step on the path to licensure.

NCARB Certificate: A credential available to architects that facilitates reciprocal licensure across U.S. jurisdictions, as well as Australia, Canada, Mexico, and New Zealand.

NOMA: The National Organization of Minority Architects.

Non-Certified Architect: An architect who does not hold an NCARB Certificate.

Pass Rate: Proportion of the number of candidates who received a passing score on an ARE division compared to the number of candidates who attempted that division.

People of Color: Individuals who identified their race as American Indian or Alaskan Native; Asian; Black or African American; or Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, as well as individuals who indicated they were of Latino or Hispanic descent.

Reciprocal License: An architecture license issued by a jurisdiction as a result of the applicant holding an initial license in a separate jurisdiction.

Success Rate: An average of the pass rates for all ARE 5.0 divisions.

163

Page 166: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS
Page 167: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS
Page 168: NCARB BY THE NUMBERS

National Council of Architectural Registration Boards1401 H St NW, Suite 500Washington, DC 20005 202/783-6500W W W . N C A R B . O R G

Join the Conversation on Social Media#NBTN


Recommended