+ All Categories
Home > Documents > NCS vs UKCS and Other North Sea Areas: Similarities ... - Underexplored plays... · Maturation of a...

NCS vs UKCS and Other North Sea Areas: Similarities ... - Underexplored plays... · Maturation of a...

Date post: 20-Jul-2018
Category:
Upload: lethien
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
27
© 2015 Gaffney, Cline & Associates. All Rights Reserved. © 2015 Gaffney, Cline & Associates. All rights reserved. Terms and conditions of use: by accepting this document, the recipient agrees that the document together with all information included therein is the confidential and proprietary property of Gaffney, Cline & Associates and includes valuable trade secrets and/or proprietary information of Gaffney, Cline & Associates (collectively "information"). Gaffney, Cline & Associates retains all rights under copyright laws and trade secret laws of the United States of America and other countries. The recipient further agrees that the document may not be distributed, transmitted, copied or reproduced in whole or in part by any means, electronic, mechanical, or otherwise, without the express prior written consent of Gaffney, Cline & Associates, and may not be used directly or indirectly in any way detrimental to Gaffney, Cline & Associates’ interest. Jonathan K Westbury Gaffney, Cline & Associates NCS vs UKCS and Other North Sea Areas: Similarities, Differences and What Lies Ahead?
Transcript

1

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

© 2015 Gaffney, Cline & Associates. All rights reserved. Terms and conditions of use: by accepting this document, the recipient agrees that the document together with all information included therein is the confidential and proprietary property of Gaffney, Cline & Associates and includes valuable trade secrets and/or proprietary information of Gaffney, Cline & Associates (collectively "information"). Gaffney, Cline & Associates retains all rights under copyright laws and trade secret laws of the United States of America and other countries. The recipient further agrees that the document may not be distributed, transmitted, copied or reproduced in whole or in part by any means, electronic, mechanical, or otherwise, without the express prior written consent of Gaffney, Cline & Associates, and may not be used directly or indirectly in any way detrimental to Gaffney, Cline & Associates’ interest.

Jonathan K Westbury Gaffney, Cline & Associates

NCS vs UKCS and Other North Sea Areas: Similarities, Differences and What Lies Ahead?

2

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

Confidentiality and Disclaimer Statement

This document is confidential and has been prepared for the exclusive use of the Client or parties named herein. It may not be distributed or made available, in whole or in part, to any other company or person without the prior knowledge and written consent of GCA. No person or company other than those for whom it is intended may directly or indirectly rely upon its contents. GCA is acting in an advisory capacity only and, to the fullest extent permitted by law, disclaims all liability for actions or losses derived from any actual or purported reliance on this document (or any other statements or opinions of GCA) by the Client or by any other person or entity.

3

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

Contents

Relative Maturity Comparisons Influencing Factors Future Opportunities Concluding Remarks

4

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

Relative Maturity – The Basin/Play Lifecycle Maturation of a basin / play

▪ Overall the NCS is mature,

sits on edge of the start of decline in prospectivity.

▪ NCS North Sea is much less mature than the UKCS” – But catching up very fast

▪ NCS offers 78% exploration refund so much cheaper to explore – However, an NCS well

typically costs 2-3 times that of a UKCS equivalent

Source: Bamford

Frontier Prolific Mature Exhausted

UKCS

DKCS

NCS

NLCS

5

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

-

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

Mill

ion

Sm3

oe p

er y

ear

Gas

Oil/Cond/NGL

Comparisons – Production ▪ Norway moving from predominantly oil

dominated production to more gas. ▪ Exploration focused on Norwegian North

Sea and has moved and is moving to Mid-Norway (Norwegian Sea) and Northern Norway (Barents Sea).

▪ Maturing of the NCS appears to have a more controlled growth.

▪ UKCS kicked off with Gas dominant in the late 60s to 70s in the initial “Dash for gas”.

▪ New production influenced by external events, pricing and changes in taxation policies.

▪ Is there an effect of oil price on exploration activity.

Source: NPD 2013

NCS Production – 1970-2018

UKCS Production – 1970-2018

Source: DECC 2014

HPHT focus

1986 Oil Price

2008 Oil Price

6

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

Comparisons – Europe CS Rig Activity

Rig Activity

▪ All rig activity, including development.

▪ UK and Norway clearly most active.

▪ UK has had a clear decline – some element of stabilising in last 7 years.

▪ Norway started relatively low with steady climb with similar activity over the last decade or so.

European CS Total Rig Count – 1982-2014

Source: Baker Hughes Source: Wood Mackenzie

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Num

ber o

f Rig

s

Year

Denmark

Netherlands

Norway

U.K.Brent Oil Price

7

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

Comparisons – NCS & UKCS Exploration Drilling Exploration Well Activity

▪ Norway ca.1,700 Exploration wells

since 1966. ▪ UK over 3,000 Exploration wells

since 1966.

▪ UKCS & NCS show similar overall trends up to last 7-8 years.

▪ UK had a head start in 60s but shows exploration more recently declining yet a higher success ratio.

▪ Norway opening up more acreage and perhaps the influx of more independent operators.

▪ NCS increase in last 10 years with higher oil prices making frontier areas more attractive.

Source: Wood Mackenzie

Norway Exploration Well Count – 1966-2014

UK Exploration Well Count – 1966-2014

05

101520253035404550

1966

1968

1970

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

UnsuccessfulSuccessful

020406080

100120140160180200

1966

1968

1970

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

UnsuccessfulSuccessful

Brent Oil Price

Brent Oil Price

8

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

Exploration Play Penetrations ▪ Relative exploration activity and

discovery rate up to 1999.

▪ UKCS does not include SNS

▪ Success rate per play show some relationship of success to penetration density.

Source: Millennium Atlas: Figs 19.20 & 19.22

▪ Jurassic reservoirs have

historically been main focus followed by the younger Palaeocene and Cretaceous.

9

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

Comparison - Play Penetrations

Source: Millennium Atlas: Fig 19.24

▪ UKCS excludes SNS – therefore more comparable. ▪ Plays are different on different

sectors of CS. ▪ Comparable success rates?

▪ Could this be a key to further

exploration?

UKCS

NCS 47 Number of penetrations (4) Number of successes

47 Number of penetrations (4) Number of successes

10

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

Comparisons – Discovery Creaming Curves

N. Sea Millenium Atlas Fig 20-22

Time / number of targets drilled Creaming Curves by Play

• Lower & Mid Jurassic had been most prolific, hence most targeted.

• NCS still had some way to go, UKCS had been played out?

• Upper Jurassic still had life in it on

both NCS and UKCS.

• Cretaceous yielded far more in NCS than UKCS.

• Some of the younger shallower plays still being worked as well as the deeper Palaeozoic and Basement plays.

11

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

Comparisons – Discovery Creaming Curves

▪ More recent Creaming Curves from data of NPD & DECC.

▪ Although it is believed that the Norwegian & Barents Seas do contain the volumes of the North Sea, they still have some way to go.

▪ UKCS West of Shetland and Central & Northern North Sea may have some life left.

▪ UKCS creaming curves extended through Near Field Exploration (NFE) in mature areas with infrastructure in place.

Source: NPD

Troll East

Johan Sverdrup

Ormen Lange

Statfjord

Troll West

Ekofisk

12

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

Comparisons & Influences ▪ In 2009, the UKCS & NCS offered similar risked

value per exploration dollar spent

▪ UKCS finding cost increase due to: – Well costs and budget challenges – Targeted tax allowances may offset this in some

cases

▪ Larger structure need larger volumes to be initially commercial in NCS.

▪ UK sector more open to smaller companies 150+. NCS has ca. 58 companies in total. – Smaller exploration focused companies prepared to

accept higher risk for higher rewards.

▪ “Geology doesn’t stop at the median line...”

Source: Cairn Energy – Feb 2013

The NCS Offers: • Larger prospects • 78% exploration refund

The UKCS Offers: • Higher per-barrel value • Lower drilling costs.

13

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

Influences - Technology in Opening Exploration Plays

▪ Evolving exploration technology over time.

– Provides means to better image and map the subsurface.

– Basin play analysis

– Higher levels of integrating the geosciences and other disciplines.

– Drilling and production (subsea) technology.

▪ Technology advances provide the enablers to identify and access potential plays in harsher environments.

Source: Vining et al 2005

1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s

Jack up / CDP stack Semi-subs, 3D HPHT Exploration scale 3D

Basin Play Fairways

Computing technology

Integrated Geosciences Plate Tectonics

Seis Strat Basin modelling

Seq Strat

Drilling and Production (Subsea)Tech

New Geophysics – Electromagnetic

14

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

Influencing Factors (1)

Energy Supply: ▪ With some 97% of energy needs coming from Hydro-power, Norway exports

majority of it’s HC production. ▪ UK consumes all production to meet energy needs – now a net importer of HC.

Fiscal regimes: ▪ Norway stable with high level of state participation; UK has been continually

adjusting the taxation policies with PRT etc. Hence the drive for urgency by operators to recover investments quickly.

▪ Light touch in UK versus State participation has this reflected on activity levels. ▪ High level of State Oil Company participation in Norway. (UK BNOC privatized

in 1980s?)

Licencing: ▪ UK has opened up more of the UKCS to exploration with more licencing

rounds; Norway has limited these and only recently increased the areas made available for licencing.

15

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

Influencing Factors (2) Operators: ▪ The participation of many independent operators and a reduced influence

of the Major IOCs on UKCS. Drives competition and the willingness to accept higher risked opportunities (linked to higher rewards for success). Similar picture emerging in Norway and starting to reap rewards (e.g. Lundin).

Physical Environment: ▪ Majority of NW European CS has severe working conditions

▪ In relative terms two of the main Norwegian CS areas provide the

harshest – Limiting drilling windows etc. – Higher costs mean larger volumes are required to make these attractive to

explore. – The development of a number of technologies has enabled access to more

difficult areas.

16

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

▪ EIA view of yet to find volumes by play ▪ Where is the UKCS?

Source: ECOGE

Future Exploration Opportunities

Countries of EU Estimates of billion barrels oil equivalent (boe) remaining to be discovered

UK 12-14 The Netherlands 1.2 Denmark 1.4 Spain 2.0 Italy 5.0

17

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

▪ DECCs view of the remaining exploration potential in UKCS. ▪ European Commission for

oil and gas exploration in Europe estimates 12-14 Bboe.

▪ UK undiscovered reserves

- Maximum case scenario is 17 Bboe.

(Source: DECC 2013).

Future Frontier Exploration Opportunities UKCS

18

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

NCS Current Activity

▪ Todays exploration activity has 9 operational wells. With 19 rigs active on NCS.

▪ Health of the exploration activity.

▪ Still concentrated in and around N North Sea.

▪ NCS areas will have differing exploration focus.

Frontier Exploration & Growth

Growth & NFE & Frontier

Near Field Exploration & Growth

19

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

What Lies Ahead

▪ What to the future prospectivity on NCS, the programme over the next two days looks as if it will help us to understand where new exploration opportunities and plays may exist.

▪ Implementation of new and enhanced technologies, seismic and other subsurface surveys in detecting HCs and reservoirs. Supported by improvements in drilling and production technologies supported by remote facility operations.

▪ Density of drilling – graduating further northward – BUT do not ignore

heartlands (e.g. Johan Sverdrup).

▪ NFE or ILE is another area that should not be ignored if we are to optimise these valuable resources that remain below our CS. – The tail end of the creaming curves.

20

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

Geologists need to be open to new ideas “Expect the unexpected!”

It takes a Reservoir, Source and Trap/Seal to make a field. Technology can be the enabler but not the necessarily the answer – a few examples of where to expect the unexpected.

– “Oil is found in the mind of Geologists”.

– High Risk Strat Plays.

– Palaeozoic and Other Oil Source Rocks?

– Where does Migrating Oil Go when there is no Ordinary

Reservoir?

21

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

“Oil is found in the mind of Geologists”

▪ Alba-Britannia (a hidden Billion Bbl oil field) – L. Cretaceous basin floor fan infilling low, play likely extends

into Norway, but more distal facies.

– While appraising Britannia gas-condensate field, Chevron drilled into Alba sands (Ind/Sonic log only thing on board rig).

– Oil filled Eocene exactly same Acoustic Impedence as the overlying clays ▪ Only the oil-water contact was a decent reflector!

– Eventually S-wave seismic imaged top of sand.

22

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

High Risk Strat Plays

▪ Thick sands in basin, thick shales present up-dip, proven oil kitchen, so where is the trap? – Relatively poor imaging on 3D seismic, no amplitudes recognised. – Partnership failed to agree on this strat play, GCOS ~10%, one went

non-consent & did not participate. – Key risk was lack of defined sealing trap along strike

▪ This turned out to be Buzzard field, >1 billion Bbl STOIIP, largest

current UK oil producer.

23

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

Palaeozoic and Other Oil Source Rocks?

▪ Upper Jurassic is a world class source: – Still yielding many oil, gas finds – What happens where we lack mature U.Jur?

▪ West of UK/Norway median line we have:

– Devonian oil source in Moray Firth – Lower Carboniferous oil shale in Central Scotland – Carboniferous oil shales in Northern England – Liassic oil source rocks e.g. Toarcian hot shales

▪ What is present beneath Norwegian waters?

24

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

Where does Migrating Oil Go when there is no Ordinary Reservoir? ▪ Super rich oil source rocks expel more oil than there are

conventional traps and reservoirs. ▪ Can we define unusual tanks for the oil to fill?

– Lancaster field consists of mature oil source rock abutting fractured granite basement with a Lower Cretaceous top seal. ▪ Many 100’s m of oil column.

– Rosebank-Lochnagar has oil filled sands sandwiched between lavas: ▪ Used stacked seismic cables to image in/below lavas but now can

probably achieve the same with inclined streamer geometry which is already in use offshore Norway.

25

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

Concluding Remarks

▪ Both the NCS and the UKCS can still offer attractive new exploration

potential. NCS still has some areas needing to reach full maturity.

▪ Attainment of production and a tax shelter is more important than ever for efficient UKCS exploration.

▪ As a geologist – use the past as an insight to the future. How many new plays have opened up in mature areas where we have ignored them in the past. This means not only looking below you but also above you – you may have encountered it without knowing it.

▪ And then the unexpected!

26

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

Thank You

27

© 20

15 G

affne

y, Cl

ine &

Ass

ociat

es. A

ll Righ

ts Re

serv

ed.

FORCE Conference, Stavanger – 8th/9th April, 2015 Underexplored Plays of the NCS

Contact Details

Jonathan K Westbury is a Senior Commercial Business Advisor at Gaffney, Cline and Associates, Bentley Hall, Alton, Hampshire GU34 4PU.

Gaffney, Cline & Associates Office: +44 (0)1420 525366 Mobile: +44 (0)7741 249415 [email protected] http://www.gaffney-cline.com

Gaffney Cline & Associates is a major international petroleum consultancy, which has been operating worldwide for over 50 years. GCA focuses solely on the petroleum and energy industry and specialises in the provision of policy, strategy, technical and commercial assistance to governments, financial institutions, national and international oil, gas and energy companies worldwide. The provision of due diligence, exploration mergers and acquisition studies and Reserves / Resources analysis are core components of GCA’s international business. GCA employs a combination of technical and commercial professionals in main offices in the U.K., Houston and Singapore, with supporting offices in Kazakhstan, Argentina, Colombia and Australia. These staff encompass all upstream technical disciplines, (geology, geophysics, petrophysics, reservoir engineering, drilling and completion and development planning / facilities engineering), with midstream and downstream engineering and economics, commercial, legal and business strategy professionals to complement its technical staff.


Recommended