Date post: | 12-Mar-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | ksb-school-law |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Negotiations gKelley Baker, Karen HaaseKelley Baker, Karen Haase
Steve Williams and Bobby TruheHarding & Shultz
(402) 434-3000(402) [email protected] [email protected]@ g f @ g f
[email protected] [email protected]
H & S School Law @KarenHaase@btruhe
Today’s Agenday g< LB 397 and the CIRLB 397 and the CIR< Preparing for negotiations
Wh ’ i bl d h ’< What’s negotiable, and what’s not< Negotiations techniques and tacticsNegot at o s tec ques a d tact cs
LB 397 Changesg< Significantly reforms Commission of Industrial Relations Act< Effective date: July 1, 2012y ,< Effective for the 2013-14 contract year < Negotiations begin and end much< Negotiations begin and end much earlier (they begin this fall)< Issues will no longer be “moot”<Changes the CIR Midpoint Rangeg p g
LB 397 Changesg< Negotiated agreements must be in writing, signed by the parties, and contain:< A salary schedule or objective method y j
of determining salaries< A description of benefits with a specific< A description of benefits with a specific
level of any group insurance coverage ith d ll t t fwith a dollar amount or percentage of
premiums to be paid, and by whom< A continuation clause
Timelines< Sept. 1st: Teacher association requests recognition as exclusive bargaining agentrecognition as exclusive bargaining agent< October 1st: Board responds to request< N b 1st N ti ti t b i< November 1st: Negotiations must begin< February 8th: If there is no agreement, parties submit to resolution officer< March 25th (or w/in 25 days of state aid ycertification, whichever later): Negotiations, fact finding, and mediation must endfact finding, and mediation must end< September 15th: CIR must issue decision
Recognition< Recognition -- The NSEA has requested
iti f t h i tirecognition of teacher associations:<As exclusive bargaining agents for
certificated non-supervisory personnel<For 2012-13 and 2013-14 contract yearsy
< Boards must respond by October 1st
< The NSEA will initiate certification< The NSEA will initiate certification proceedings in the CIR if boards don’t
d tlrespond promptly
Bargaining Sessionsg g< Minimum of 4 bargaining sessionsMinimum of 4 bargaining sessions<Unless the parties reach agreementP i b i d< Parties must submit to mandatory
mediation or fact finding if they don’t ed at o o act d g t ey do treach agreement by February 8th
U l b th ti t f<Unless both parties agree to forego mediation or fact findingg
Resolution Officer< Resolution Officer – the mediator or fact finder appointed by the CIR< CIR provides list of 5 names< CIR provides list of 5 names< Parties alternately strike names < The resolution officer:< Determines issues in dispute< Determines issues in dispute< Accepts stipulations< Schedules hearings
Resolution Officer< Sets rules of conduct for conferences< May order additional mediation < Takes any other action to aid inTakes any other action to aid in resolving the dispute
D t lt ith t< Does not consult with one party without the other party’s permission p y p< Not bound by strict rules of evidence< Non attorneys may represent parties< Non-attorneys may represent parties
Resolution Officer< Officer decides which issues were:Officer decides which issues were:< In dispute
N ti t d i d f ith< Negotiated in good faith < Not agreed upon
< Limits decision to issues in dispute< Must choose the most reasonable final< Must choose the most reasonable final offer on each issue in dispute
Resolution Officer< Decides which issues were:Decides which issues were:<In dispute
N i d i d f i h<Negotiated in good faith<Not agreed uponNot ag eed upo
< Limits issues to those in disputeM t h th t bl< Must choose the most reasonable
final offer on each issue in disputef ff p
Action/Petition in the CIR< Dissatisfied party may file an action in the CIR w/in 14 days of officer’s decision< Not an appeal of officer’s decisionpp
< CIR is limited to deciding issues that the officer held were in disputethe officer held were in dispute< CIR will decide issues on comparability, not most reasonable final offer< CIR must issue its decision by Sept. 15thy pof the contract year in question
Total Compensationp< The CIR must consider employers’ payment of/contribution to:< Health insurance premiums< Health insurance premiums,
premium equivalent payments, or cash equivalent payments
< FICA payments< FICA payments< Retirement payments
The “CIR Midpoint”p< The “CIR midpoint” is the average of the true midpoint and the average total compensation of an arraytotal compensation of an array
98-102% Midpoint Range p g< During normal economic times (non recessionary times)< The CIR must determine whether< The CIR must determine whether
the district’s total compensation is within 98-102% of the midpoint
<If it is the CIR will not order a<If it is, the CIR will not order a change
Up to 98%, Down to 102%p ,< If the total compensation is less than 98%, the CIR will order it raised to 98% of the midpointto 98% of the midpoint< If the total compensation is more than 102%, the CIR will order it lowered to 102% of the midpointlowered to 102% of the midpoint
93-107% Midpoint Range p g< If the total compensation is less than 93% of the midpoint, the CIR will order it raised to 98% in threewill order it raised to 98% in three equal annual increases< If the total compensation is more than 107% of the midpoint the CIRthan 107% of the midpoint, the CIR will order it lowered to 102% in three equal annual increases
Recessionary Occurrencey< There is a “Recessionary occurrence” when, in:
< the two quarters immediately preceding the effective date of the contract term in which net (i) state sales and use tax,(ii) individual income tax, and (iii) corporate income tax receipts are less than the same quarters for the prior year.
< During a recessionary occurrence, the u g ecess o y occu e ce, erange will be 95 to 102% of the midpoint
Preparing for Negotiationsp g g
Good Faith Bargainingg g< Good faith bargaining involves theGood faith bargaining involves the obligation to:
M bl i< Meet at reasonable times< Discuss mandatory itemsscuss a dato y te s< Genuinely consider and respond
t th ’ lto others’ proposals< It does not require the board to qconcede on any issues
Preparing for Negotiationsp g g< Review the negotiated agreementg g’ Board review’ Administrator review’ Administrator review$Improve provisions$Eliminate provisions$Why$Why$How
Preparing for Negotiationsp g g< Review grievancesg< Review other districts’ contracts< Perform a comparability study< Perform a comparability study< Develop a full list of board issues< Raise all the issues
Know the Foe
Common NSEA Proposals
Administering Negotiationsg g< Control the recordkeepingp g< Control the wording
R d th t t< Read the contract< Every timey
Setting Ground Rulesg< Date for conclusion -- statutory< Beginning and ending times< Submit proposals in advance< Submit proposals in advance< Cost out proposals< Cooperatively establish placement< Rationale for each proposalRationale for each proposal< Tentative nature of agreement
Si i< Signing party
What is Negotiable?g< Mandatory< Mandatory< Permissive< Prohibited
Salary Scheduley< MandatoryMandatory
Work Day y< Permissive< Permissive
Class Size< Permissive
Bonus/Incentive Paymentsy< MandatoryMandatory
Health Insurance Carrier< Health Insurance Coverage isHealth Insurance Coverage is Mandatory
Health Insurance Carrier< Health Insurance Coverage isHealth Insurance Coverage is Mandatory
C i i P i i< Carrier is Permissive
Reduction-in-Force PolicyReduction in Force Policy< Permissive< Permissive
Curriculum< Prohibited< Prohibited
Extra-Duty Assignmentsy g
< Permissive
Personal Leave< Mandatory
School Calendar< Permissive< Permissive
Number of Work Daysy< PermissivePermissive
Economic Effect< Though the board may not have to g ynegotiate an issue, it must negotiate the economic effect of the issue (e g ):economic effect of the issue (e.g.):’ Length of school year’ Planning time
Duties of Paraprofessionals
< Prohibited< Prohibited
Planning Timeg
< Permissive< Permissive
Subcontractingg< Prohibited< Prohibited
Early Separationy p< PermissivePermissive
Grievance Procedure
< Mandatory< Mandatory
Evaluation Systemy< Prohibited
Professional Developmentp< PermissivePermissive
Substitute Payy< Prohibited< Prohibited
Probationary Periody
P hibit d< Prohibited
Definition of the Bargaining Unit
McCook E.S.P. Assn. v. Red Willow Co. Dist. 17< NSEA tried to organize all classified into a single unit< District ObjectedDistrict Objected< CIR ruled for District:
S ff diff d k dl i h i’ Staff differed markedly in their wages, working conditions, skillswages, working conditions, skills and duties.
Delperdang v. U.E.W. < Bargaining unit established in 1995 included maintenance workers, custodians and secretariescustodians and secretaries< Secretaries outvoted; wanted own unit
CIR l d f t i< CIR ruled for secretaries’ Work, pay, schedules all different’ Secretaries can now bargain directly with the districtwith the district
So, Who Is In The Unit?< Those with similar duties, working , gconditions and pay
T h = it d t i l d< Teachers= unit does not include:’ Administrators/Supervisorsp’ Aides/Paras’ Nurses’ Nurses’ Substitutes’ School psychologist, speech path?
Commission of Industrial Relations
Increase Base Salaryy< Yes< Yes
Reduce Base Salaryy< TheoreticallyTheoretically
Change Health Insurance Carriers
< No
Adopt Grievance Procedurep< Yes< Yes
Offer Early Retirementy< No
Continuation Clause< Yes, but . . . ,
AMea Culpa@ NoticeMea Culpa Notice< Yes but< Yes, but . . .
Pay a Teacher Morey< Yes< Yes
Hold Board Members Personally Liabley
< No
Fire Administrators< NoNo
Allow Personal Use of Phones and Computers
< No
Provide Dental Coverage
< Not unless it=s a prevalent practicepractice
Comparability
Table Manners
Fundamental Conceptsp< Get the other side to commit first< Get the other side to commit first< Act dumb, not smart< Think real money, but talk funny moneymoney< Concentrate on the issues
Tactics and Techniques
Ask for More Than You Expect To Getp
< You might get it< It gives you room to maneuver< You can make bigger concessions< You can make bigger concessions< Increases perceived value of your offer< Helps avoid deadlocksHelps avoid deadlocks
Nothing for Nothing< Don=t give anything away!!g y g y< “If we do that for you what will you do for us?@you do for us?’You might get something’Elevates value of concessionconcession
Feel, Felt, Found< AI know exactly how you feel@y y< AI=ve felt that way myself@AI= f d th t @< AI=ve found that . . . @
The Call Girl PrincipleThe Call Girl Principle
The Call Girl Principlep< Get a Reciprocal pConcession Right Away
Bracketingg< Your initial proposal should be anYour initial proposal should be an equal distance on the other side of
bj ti th i lyour objective as their proposal’ Association wants $1,200 increase$ ,’ You=re willing to give $1,000
Off th 800’ Offer them 800
Tapering Concessionsp gConcessions Create Expectations
< Don't make equal size concessions< Don't make the last one the big one< Don't make the last one the big one< Don=t give it all away up front< Don=t test the waters< The right way to make concessions< The right way to make concessions
Good Cop/Bad Copp p
Good Cop/Bad Cop< How to use it< How to respond to it
Id tif it’ Identify it’ Create own bad guyg y’ Let the bad guy talk
Nibbling< How to nibble< How to respond ’ make them feel’ make them feel cheap, in a good-natured way’ Address all details’ Address all details’ Make them feel they won.
The Flinch< React with shock and surprise to pthe other side=s proposals
Appeal to Higher Authority pp g y
Appeal to Higher Authority pp g y< Retain your ability to appeal to< Retain your ability to appeal to higher authority< Counter Gambit’ Appeal to their ego’ Appeal to their ego’ Commitment of recommendation
Q lifi d A bj t t @’ Qualified Asubject to@
Position the Other SideFor Easy Acceptancey p
< Last minute, small concession
Don=t Offer toSplit the Differencep
The Vise< You'll have to do better than that.
C t< Counter:’ Exactly how much ybetter do I have to do?do?
Let Things Take Timeg
What if You Just Can=t Settle?
Consider an Outside Negotiator
Bargaining Scenariosg g
Negotiations gKelley Baker, Karen HaaseKelley Baker, Karen Haase
Steve Williams and Bobby TruheHarding & Shultz
(402) 434-3000(402) [email protected] [email protected]@ g f @ g f
[email protected] [email protected]
H & S School Law @KarenHaase@btruhe