Implementing a
reliability centred
approach during wind
turbine development
Hamburg, 20 February 2013
Bruce Valpy
© BVG Associates 2013
2/22
• Why focus on reliability
• Cost of energy
• Health and safety
• Reliability centred approach
• 10 steps to success
Contents
Justification
Reliability centred approach during wind turbine development
Introduction
© BVG Associates 2013
• BAV add
Selected clients
BVG Associates
• Market analysis and business development
• Supply chain development
• Economic impact assessment
• Support to industrialisation
• Project implementation
• FIT project development (UK only)
• SCADA & condition monitoring
• O&M technical support
• Technical innovation & engineering analysis
• Support to investment in technology
• R&D programme management
• Design and engineering services
3/22
• Why focus on reliability
• Cost of energy
• Health and safety
• Reliability centred approach
• 10 steps to success
Contents
Justification
Reliability centred approach during wind turbine development
Introduction
© BVG Associates 2013
• BAV add
Selected clients
BVG Associates
• Market analysis and business development
• Supply chain development
• Economic impact assessment
• Support to industrialisation
• Project implementation
• FIT project development (UK only)
• SCADA & condition monitoring
• O&M technical support
• Technical innovation & engineering analysis
• Support to investment in technology
• R&D programme management
• Design and engineering services
• Need to understand the past before talking about cost reduction in the future
• Between 2003 and 2010, CAPEX increased (blue bars)
• Much can be explained by change of site conditions
• Much of the rest can be explained by market conditions
• Due to increases in site wind speeds and use of larger turbines, LCOE decreased during period
despite CAPEX increase
• CAPEX stabilised 2010-12
Cost of energy Health warning
© BVG Associates 2013
CAPEX has been going up, not down
4/22
4 Dimensional cost model: Time, types of wind farm site, turbine sizes, industry scenarios
6 Industry day-long workshops (in UK, DK, DE)
20 Deep industry interviews (4 hours +)
125 Industry individuals directly involved
215 Pages – available for download from our website
Methodology in numbers: technology work stream
Cost reduction pathways study
Overview
• 2011 UK Government Energy white paper:
• Central scenario 13GW by 2020
• Minded to support to 18GW if cost of energy
reduced – target £100/MWh
• The Crown Estate cost reduction pathways study established to
evidence what industry thinks could be done
• Supply chain, finance and technology work streams
= + +
• Published summer 2012
Context
© BVG Associates 2013
Cost reduction pathways study: results
• Given right external conditions, industry
can meet target:
• Confidence in market size to beyond 2020
• Smooth and timely transition under EMR
• Planning consent timelines reliably met
• Clear and predictable offshore grid
regulatory framework
• Facilitation of new technology introduction
• To deliver, industry also needs to work together:
• Best practice, standardisation,
risk management, accessing new finance
5/22
Why focus on reliability The case for focus on wind turbine reliability
OPEX is already 1/3 of LCOE and growing
© BVG Associates 2013
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
4-A
-11
8-D
-20
Co
ntr
ibution to
LC
OE
Wind farm development Turbine Support structure Array cablesInstallation OPEX Decommissioning
Source: BVG Associates
6/22
Why focus on reliability The case for focus on wind turbine reliability
Most non-fixed OPEX is turbine-related
© BVG Associates 2013
Turbine electrical,
34%
Hub and pitch
system, 20%
Gearbox and main
shaft, 11%
Generator, 8%
Blades, 4%
Array cable, 3%
Support structure,
3%Other
turbine,
16%
Other wind farm, 2%
Source: BVG Associates
7/22
Why focus on reliability The case for focus on wind turbine reliability
Most OPEX is unplanned service – reactive or proactive
© BVG Associates 2013
90%
92%
94%
96%
98%
100%
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Win
d fa
rm a
vailab
ility
£k/M
W/y
r
Operating year
Operation and planned maintenance Unplanned service - proactiveUnplanned service - reactive OMS expenditure during waranty periodTotal OMS expenditure (forecast at FID) Wind farm availability
Source: BVG Associates
8/22
Why focus on reliability The case for focus on wind turbine reliability
Summary
© BVG Associates 2013
OPEX
~40% of LCOE
Operations
Unplanned Service
~75% of OPEX
Turbine
~90% of Service
Electrical Transmission
Foundation
Planned Maintenance
If...
• If turbines were 100% reliable, so just needed visits for
planned maintenance...
• OPEX down 68%
• Lifetime expenditure down 27%
• Lost energy down by 90%
• LCOE down by 30%
• Visits down 70%
• Accidents down by >80%
• Increased certainty would increase pool of investors
and hence decrease cost of capital
9/22
Lots good
Few components / systems tested thoroughly
Poor justification for component survival (beyond
calculations)
Main component exchange not designed in / tested
Not possible to easily replace wear parts
Poor / incomplete manuals and troubleshooting guides
Track record of unreliable systems / repeat faults
Training strategies not implemented
Site work records incomplete
SCADA report errors
Significant inefficiencies on site
Type Certificate (does not consider the above)
Why focus on reliability The case for focus on wind turbine reliability
Where our experience comes from
© BVG Associates 2013
Due diligence - experience
10/22
http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=bp+logo&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=Rtr2g-YVy7qc9M&tbnid=ULj4OqR0cUp8vM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=bp+logo&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=Rtr2g-YVy7qc9M&tbnid=ULj4OqR0cUp8vM:&ved=&url=http%3A%2F%2Fkokomoperspective.com%2Fnews%2Fbp-sold-tainted-gasoline-in-kokomo%2Farticle_b28b77b2-f203-11e1-8f92-0019bb2963f4.html%3Fmode%3Dimage%26photo%3D0&ei=DWQkUbSdB8eSswavzICYBA&bvm=bv.42661473,d.Yms&psig=AFQjCNHpu5Rn4zC7LXD-dHnSP7MWa0iUIA&ust=1361425805656665&ei=ImQkUerzE4WItAa01YHICg&bvm=bv.42661473,d.Yms&psig=AFQjCNHpu5Rn4zC7LXD-dHnSP7MWa0iUIA&ust=1361425805656665
Reliability centred approach Important ingredients of reliability centred approach
1a. Reliability budget
© BVG Associates 2013
Turbine MTBF* = 3 months
(90 days)
Rotor 365 days
Blade
900days
Hub Assembly 600 days
Blade bearing 3650 days
Pitch System 450 days
Other 3650 days
Nacelle 200 days
Drive Train MTBF = 700 days
Gearbox MTBF = 3650 days
Generator MTBF = 3650 days
Converter MTBF = 2000 days
Other MTBF = 2700 days
Yaw system MTBF = 900 days
Control system MTBF = 700 days
Auxiliary systems MTBF = 900 days
Tower & Transition Piece
300 days
10 Steps to success
1. Reliability and OPEX
budgets (and model)
* MTBF (large vessel intervention, small
vessel intervention & remote reset)
11/22
Reliability centred approach Important ingredients of reliability centred approach
1b. Reliability and OPEX model
© BVG Associates 2013
OMS strategy
• Failure response strategy
(MTBR)
• Weather capability
• Vessel-related, labour and
spares costs
Generic design site
conditions
• Distance to OMS port
• Range of other physical site
parameters
• Wind and wave climate
(inc. persistence data)
Availability
Energy- or time-based
OPEX
Taking into account lost revenue
Product design and
verification
Justification for MTBF data
based on:
• Operational experience
• Reliability analyses
• Sub-system and component
verification and testing +
10 Steps to success
1. Reliability and OPEX
budgets (and model)
MTBF
Three sets of MTBF data, self-
consistent down to sub-
system/component level*:
• Simple resets
• Small vessel interventions
• Large vessel interventions
+
12/22
Reliability centred approach Important ingredients of reliability centred approach
2. ‘Rules of thumb’
© BVG Associates 2013
• A ‘small boat’ intervention
costs average €15,000
• Worth spending €1k CAPEX if
can save €X OPEX per year
• Downtime costs average
€8k/day (€20k for windy day)
• FMEA – hard to do well,
balanced across range of
components
• Logic and probalistic FTA
• Six sigma
3. Component reliability reviews 10 Steps to success
2. ‘Rules of thumb’
1. Reliability and OPEX
budgets (and model)
3. Component reliability
reviews
13/22
Reliability centred approach Important ingredients of reliability centred approach
4. Test and verification
© BVG Associates 2013
10 Steps to success
2. ‘Rules of thumb’
1. Reliability and OPEX
budgets (and model)
4. Test and verification
3. Component reliability
reviews
14/22
Reliability centred approach Important ingredients of reliability centred approach
4. Test and verification
© BVG Associates 2013
10 Steps to success
2. ‘Rules of thumb’
1. Reliability and OPEX
budgets (and model)
4. Test and verification
3. Component reliability
reviews
15/22
Reliability centred approach Important ingredients of reliability centred approach
5. Demonstration of maintenance procedures
© BVG Associates 2013
10 Steps to success
2. ‘Rules of thumb’
1. Reliability and OPEX
budgets (and model)
4. Test and verification
3. Component reliability
reviews
5. Demonstration of
maintenance procedures
16/22
Reliability centred approach Important ingredients of reliability centred approach
6. Joined up SCADA/control/CM
© BVG Associates 2013
10 Steps to success
2. ‘Rules of thumb’
1. Reliability and OPEX
budgets (and model)
4. Test and verification
3. Component reliability
reviews
6.
Joined up SCADA/
control/CM
5. Demonstration of
maintenance procedures
Holistic
decisions
CMS Engineering
17/22
Reliability centred approach Important ingredients of reliability centred approach
7. Feedback from site
© BVG Associates 2013
10 Steps to success
2. ‘Rules of thumb’
1. Reliability and OPEX
budgets (and model)
4. Test and verification
3. Component reliability
reviews
7. Feedback from site
6.
Joined up SCADA/
control/CM
5. Demonstration of
maintenance procedures
18/22
Reliability centred approach Important ingredients of reliability centred approach
8. Useful, accurate data
© BVG Associates 2013
10 Steps to success
2. ‘Rules of thumb’
1. Reliability and OPEX
budgets (and model)
4. Test and verification
3. Component reliability
reviews
8. Useful, accurate data
7. Feedback from site
6.
Joined up SCADA/
control/CM
5. Demonstration of
maintenance procedures
19/22
Reliability centred approach Important ingredients of reliability centred approach
9. Fix first time approach
© BVG Associates 2013
10 Steps to success
2. ‘Rules of thumb’
1. Reliability and OPEX
budgets (and model)
4. Test and verification
3. Component reliability
reviews
9. Fix first time approach
8. Useful, accurate data
7. Feedback from site
6.
Joined up SCADA/
control/CM
5. Demonstration of
maintenance procedures
20/22
Reliability centred approach Important ingredients of reliability centred approach
10. Reliability champion
© BVG Associates 2013
10 Steps to success
2. ‘Rules of thumb’
1. Reliability and OPEX
budgets (and model)
4. Test and verification
3. Component reliability
reviews
10. Reliability champion
9. Fix first time approach
8. Useful, accurate data
7. Feedback from site
6.
Joined up SCADA/
control/CM
5. Demonstration of
maintenance procedures
Bill Shankly, Liverpool Football Club
21/22
http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=liverpool+fc&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=fLyrShC1R_KBsM&tbnid=PPIWg3OFoUz5uM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://www.thedrum.com/news/2012/01/30/liverpool-fc-partner-3k-battery-grow-brand-thailand&ei=0QEkUcWhK_C00QWu8oCABA&bvm=bv.42661473,d.d2k&psig=AFQjCNGCqvgsXZWXmmWgPzSMCzcS0W3PJg&ust=1361400569680272http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=bill+shankly+quotes&source=images&cd=&docid=r5q233HdyxKiiM&tbnid=7Yf0hNkHO2T6YM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://www.o-posts.net/news/football-debates/football-important/&ei=mroiUa_LAoWhtAatroGIBg&bvm=bv.42553238,d.bGE&psig=AFQjCNFU6WWNhczs6rXsk69lYjnc6qV45w&ust=1361316867620694
Reliability centred approach during wind turbine development
Important ingredients of reliability centred approach
Beautiful, happy offshore wind farms...
22/22
... are born in messy places