New MNS
New Grasp
New Concept
New Anatomy
Fig 1
Fig 2
Fig 3
Fig 3
AIP
DorsalStream:
Affordances
IT
Ways to grab
“It’s a mug” F5
canonicalF1
Hand Control
Task Constraints (F6)Working Memory (46)Instruction Stimuli (F2)
PFC
cIPSVentralStream:
Recognition
PF
IT
Hand-objecttrajectories
“It’s a mug” F1
Hand ControlFeedback Correction
Task Constraints (F6)Working Memory (46)Instruction Stimuli (F2)
PFC
STS
HandShape &Motion
F5mirror
F5 canonical
Command Actions
Observe Execute
Interpretation
F5 mirror
Recognize Actions
Planning
VisualInput AIP F5 canonical
PF F5 mirror
Choosing an Action
Recognizing an Action
PF extended
MultimodalBroca’s area
(vocal, manual, oro-
facial) Protosign (basis for sign language)
Tpt Protospeech (basis for speech)
Wernicke’s From Imitation to Describing Actions, Objects, Relationships
AuditoryInput
STSa
DPLF
IT
RecognizingActions, Objects, and
Relationships
Working Memory forActions, Objects, and
Relationships
Working Memory forPerception and Production of
Utterances
Arbib, 2001 updated by FARS modificato
STS 7a
Handshape
recognition
Hand-Objectspatial relation
analysis
Object affordance-hand stateassociation
Object affordanceextraction
Actionrecognition(MirrorNeurons)
Motor program(Grasp)
Motorexecution
MirrorFeedback
Integratetemporalassociation
7b: PF/PGF5canonical
AIP
M1
F5mirror
Object features
Objectlocation
Motorprogram(Reach)F4
Vis
ual C
orte
xcIPS
Handmotiondetection
The Mirror Neuron
System (MNS) Model
(Oztop & Arbib)
•Activity of F5 canonical neurons is part of the code forCommand: Grasp-A(Object) The full neural representation of the “Cognitive
Form” (CF): Grasp-A(Object) requires not only the regions AIP and F5canonical shown in the MNS diagram, but also inferotemporal cortex (IT) which holds the identity of the object. How are these representations bound together?
•NOTE: This is only the “Cognitive Form”. There are no “Linguistic Forms” in the monkey.
• Activity of F5 mirror neurons is part of the code forDeclarative: Grasp-A(Agent, Object) The full neural representation of the “Cognitive Form” (CF): Grasp-A(Agent, Object) requires not only the regions AIP, STS, 7a, 7b and F5miirror shown in the MNS diagram, but also inferotemporal cortex (IT) which holds the identity of the object and regions of STS (?) not included in MNS which hold the identity of the agent.
• How are these representations bound together?
STS7a
Handshape
recognition
Hand-Objectspatial relationanalysis
Object affordance-hand stateassociation
Object affordanceextraction
Motor program(Grasp)
Motorexecution
MirrorFeedback
Integratetemporalassociation
7b: PF/PG
F5canonicalAIP
M1
F5mirror
Object features
Objectlocation
Motorprogram(Reach)
F4
Vis
ual
Cor
tex
cIPS
Handmotiondetection
The Mirror Neuron System (MNS) Model
(Oztop & Arbib)
Actionrecognitio
n
• Agent Action Object Analysis of the Mirror System makes• Grasp (Raisin) primary, where the Agent is the self and thus unspecified, • and then makes• Grasp (Leo, Raisin) secondary• The mirror system expands the representational capacity of the canonical system to allow the Agent role to be played by others as well.
• But note that the full power of the system is “Beyond the Mirror” embedding MNS in a larger system:
F5 canonical
Executed Action Object
IT
F5 mirror
Observed ActionAgent
STS
view of object
AIP
grasp of object
gesture recognition
STS (and 7b?)
commandENN 7b or F5?
viewof gesture
F5
MPG
corollary discharge
MP: Gesture Motor Program
Learn by Imitation "Social
Learning"
Learn by DoingTry to Grasp
Object
Mirror neurons
Non-Mirror Neurons
gesture description
expectation