R h o d e I s l a n d A i r p o r t C o r p o r a t i o n

Permanent Noise Monitoring Act Quarterly Operations Report

2nd Quarter 2005

Prepared by:

Diane Carter for the Noise Mitigation Programs Office Rhode Island Airport Corporation

December 2005

For further information, please contact: Helena Sieniukowicz, 737-4000 ext. 297

Quarterly Operations Report

Second Quarter 2005

Page 2 of 26

R h o d e I s l a n d A i r p o r t C o r p o r a t i o n

TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...........................................................................................................3 Permanent Noise Monitoring Act...........................................................................3 Passenger Activity.................................................................................................5 Aircraft Operations ................................................................................................5 Total Operations .........................................................................................6 Part 36 Certification ....................................................................................8 Late Night Operations.................................................................................9 By Time..........................................................................................10 By Airline........................................................................................10 By Aircraft Category.......................................................................11 Part 150 Noise Abatement Corridor Compliance ................................................11 By Airline ..................................................................................................15 By Runway ...............................................................................................16 Noise Complaints ................................................................................................20 Appendix A: Part 150 Corridor Deviations..........................................................21

Quarterly Operations Report

Second Quarter 2005

Page 3 of 26

R h o d e I s l a n d A i r p o r t C o r p o r a t i o n

Introduction This report is prepared for the Rhode Island General Assembly in conformance with the Permanent Noise Monitoring Act of 1998, as amended. It contains statistical information on aircraft operations, activity levels by aircraft types, and noise complaints for the Second Quarter, 2005. T. F. Green Airport is a medium-hub commercial service airport located in Warwick, RI. It serves the Rhode Island, Southern Massachusetts and Eastern Connecticut communities. In the mid-1990s, Southwest airlines began service at T.F. Green which resulted in a significant increase in aircraft operations and the ability for travelers in the southern New England area to reach many destinations easily and affordably. The airport has two active runways, 5-23 and 16-34. Runway 5-23 is 7,166 feet long and 150’ feet wide. It is oriented in a north/south direction and serves as the primary runway for large turbojet operations. Runway 16-34 is the “crosswind” runway oriented in a northwest/southeast direction. It is 6,081 feet long and 150 feet wide and is utilized as weather conditions dictate. T.F. Green was among the first airports in the country to participate in the Federal Aviation Administration’s Noise and Land Use Compatibility Program, commonly referred to as Part 150. Under the direction of the State of Rhode Island and now the Rhode Island Airport Corporation, T. F. Green Airport has had an active noise mitigation program since the early 1980s. In 1998, RIAC undertook a complete update of the original Part 150 Study and recommended several new operations procedures designed to minimize noise impacts on surrounding communities. The center of these recommendations involved the implementation of noise abatement departure procedures for turbojet aircraft. In June 2000, the FAA approved these new procedures and the local air traffic control tower implemented the assigned departure headings in an effort to reduce the number of persons adversely affected by aircraft operations.

Permanent Noise Monitoring Act In 1998, the Rhode Island Legislature enacted Title 1, Aeronautics, Chapter 1-5, Permanent Noise Monitoring Act – Aircraft Operations Monitoring System (AOMS). This Act requires the Rhode Island Airport Corporation (RIAC) to install an aircraft operations monitoring system. Once installed, RIAC is to collect and report on a quarterly basis detailed and summary information related to the operation of aircraft at Green Airport. This document is generated to meet those requirements. The AOMS is a stand-alone system that has five (5) radar sensors deployed throughout the State of Rhode Island (see Figure 1). These sensors receive specific aircraft information from all aircraft with transponders operating within 20 miles of T. F. Green Airport. This information is delivered real-time to the Noise Program Manager where it is correlated daily and displayed on a computer screen. The data is archived for use in generating reports. Information collected includes; aircraft type, flight number, registration number, altitude, arrival/departure status and the origin or destination.

Quarterly Operations Report

Second Quarter 2005

Page 4 of 26

R h o d e I s l a n d A i r p o r t C o r p o r a t i o n

The use of five sensors throughout the state allows for a greater accuracy in identifying the flight tracks. This system is independent from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) air traffic control radar. The movement of aircraft to and from an airport is the responsibility of FAA Air Traffic Control.

Figure 1: Aircraft Operations Monitoring System Radar Sensors

Source: RIAC, 2005

Quarterly Operations Report

Second Quarter 2005

Page 5 of 26

R h o d e I s l a n d A i r p o r t C o r p o r a t i o n

Passenger Activity Airports use two different criterions to measure activity for an airport, the number of operations and passengers. This section discusses the passenger activity levels associated with aircraft operations at T. F Green Airport. Passenger levels are growing at T. F. Green Airport. During the second quarter, passenger levels increased approximately 7% over the same quarter 2004. T.F. Green served approximately 1,529,360 passengers during the quarter. During the month of May, 511,421 passengers, the highest number of passengers for a single month in over 5 years, used T. F. Green. The second quarter 2005 continues the trend of increased passenger growth for the Airport. Figure 2 shows the steady increase in the number of passengers that have utilized the airport via scheduled air carriers, commuter and charter flights since 2002. Figure 2: Total Passengers, by Quarter

100,000

600,000

1,100,000

1,600,000

1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr

Quarters

# o

f P

assen

gers

2005

2004

2003

2002

Source: RIAC 2005 Passenger Activity Report

Aircraft Operations Aircraft operations can be classified in a number of ways including by type of aircraft, arrivals/departures, origin/destination, airline fleet, Part 36 (relative noisiness) and time of day. To present the overall perspective of operations, Table 1, highlights the arrivals and departures of all aircraft by runway at T. F. Green Airport. In general aircraft must take off into the wind, therefore, aircraft also arrive into the wind to remain consistent with the traffic flow and avoid aircraft departing and arriving in the same direction.

Quarterly Operations Report

Second Quarter 2005

Page 6 of 26

R h o d e I s l a n d A i r p o r t C o r p o r a t i o n

As previously stated there are two runways at T. F. Green, 5-23 and 16-34. Runways are given numbers based on the compass heading for each runway end. By designating each runway end, the Tower and pilots know which direction to land or depart. For example, Runway 5 has a compass heading of 050 degrees and is oriented to the north. Aircraft operating on this runway will depart to the north and arrive from the south. Conversely, Runway 23 has a heading of 230 degrees and is oriented to the south. Aircraft operating on Runway 23 will depart to the south and arrive from the north.

Total Operations The Aircraft Operations Monitoring System (AOMS) collected 26,939 flight tracks during this reporting period. There were 13,275 departures and 13,664 arrivals for an average 299 operations per day. The Federal Aviation Administration reported 31,005 aircraft operations. The difference between the number of operations collected by AOMS and the FAA can be attributed to a number of factors including the system was non-operational for approximately 8 days during the quarter. The data collected by the AOMS is for analysis purposes only. The official count of operations for an airport is maintained by the FAA. Table 1 depicts aircraft operations by runway and operation type.1 Table 1: Total Operations by Runway, 2nd Quarter 2005

Arrivals Departures Total Runway

# of Ops % # of Ops % # of Ops %

23 7,821 57% 7,151 54% 14,972 56%

5 4,920 36% 4,835 36% 9,755 36%

16 361 3% 767 6% 1,128 4%

34 562 4% 522 4% 1,084 4%

Total 13,664 100% 13,275 100% 26,939 100% Source: RIAC 2005, Operations Monitoring System

Departures occurred predominantly to the south on Runway 23 with the majority of the arrivals from the north on Runway 23. As the weather turned warmer, an increased use of Runway 23 occurred as well as a decrease in the number of operations utilizing the crosswind runway (Runway 16-34). Figure 3, depicts this runway use graphically over an aerial view of the airport

Quarterly Operations Report

Second Quarter 2005

Page 7 of 26

R h o d e I s l a n d A i r p o r t C o r p o r a t i o n

Figure 3: Aerial View of Total Operations, by Runway End, 2nd Quarter, 2005

Source: RIAC, Operations Monitoring System, 2005

Quarterly Operations Report

Second Quarter 2005

Page 8 of 26

R h o d e I s l a n d A i r p o r t C o r p o r a t i o n

The rest of this section will highlight the scheduled air carrier and cargo operations. Since these operations are the primary focus of the noise abatement efforts and Part 150 Study as well as the predominant operator category at the airport.

Part 36 Certification During the 2nd Quarter of 2005 there were approximately 9,410 departures of commercial aircraft from T. F. Green Airport, which averages out to approximately 105 operations per day. This number includes air carrier and cargo operations. The overall percentage of pure Stage 3 aircraft operating at T. F. Green Airport is 99% or 9,410 operations during this quarter. Figure 4: Schedule Departures by Noise Classification, 2004 - 2005

Source: RIAC, Airline Activity Reports and Operations Monitoring System, 2005.

The airlines accounted for 9,328 (98%) of the 9,534 commercial departures from T. F. Green Airport, (Table 4). The airlines are operating at 99% pure Stage 3 aircraft and less than 1% Stage 3 compliant (hushkitted Stage 2 aircraft). All airline operations are scheduled to occur between 6:00 a.m. and midnight. Table 2 also illustrates each scheduled air carrier’s contribution to daily flights and percentage use of the quietest aircraft.

8962

9849

90779,410

267 248 264 134

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

3Q2004 4Q2004 1Q2005 2Q2005

Quarters

# o

f D

ep

art

ure

s

Stage 3

St.3 H-kit

Quarterly Operations Report

Second Quarter 2005

Page 9 of 26

R h o d e I s l a n d A i r p o r t C o r p o r a t i o n

Table 2: Airline Departures, by Part 36 Certification, 2nd Quarter 2005 Stage 3 Hushkitted Aircraft

Pure Stage 3 Aircraft

Airline

# of Departures

% # of Departures

%

Total Operations

Avg. Daily Departures

American 0 0% 506 100% 506 6 Continental 0 0% 741 100% 741 8 Delta 0 0% 787 100% 787 9 Independence 0 0% 366 100% 366 4 Northwest 10 2% 605 98% 615 7 Southwest 0 0% 3,038 100% 3,038 34 Spirit 0 0% 295 100% 295 3 US Air 0 0% 2,036 100% 2,036 23 United 0 0% 944 100% 944 10 Total 10 2% 9,318 98% 9,328 1042 Source: RIAC Air Carrier Reports, 2005

Late Night Operations (Midnight – 6:00 a.m.) RIAC has implemented a voluntary nighttime curfew for operations between midnight and 6:00 a.m. RIAC continual works with the airlines, no flights are scheduled during this time period. However, should a flight be delayed for weather or mechanical reasons, it will continue to operate so that passengers will not be unduly disrupted. Scheduled commercial airlines conducted the greatest number of late night operations, closely followed by general aviation, (privately owned aircraft). Commercial aircraft conducted 158 operations during curfew hours including 117 air carrier operations. The majority of all late night operations, 147 or 64%, occurred between midnight and 1:00 a.m. are comprised mainly of arrivals.

2 Cargo operations accounted for approximately 1 operation per day.

Quarterly Operations Report

Second Quarter 2005

Page 10 of 26

R h o d e I s l a n d A i r p o r t C o r p o r a t i o n

Figure 5: Late Night Operations for All Aircraft Types, by Time

020406080

100120140160180

# o

f O

pe

rati

on

s

12:0

0-12

:59

1:00

-1:5

9

2:00

-2:5

9

3:00

-3:5

9

4:00

-4:5

9

5:00

-5:5

9

3Q2004

4Q2004

1Q2005

2Q2005

Source: RIAC Operations Logs, 2005

United Airlines and U.S. Air operated the most late night operations. It should be noted that this accounts for a small percentage of the individual airlines total operations at T. F. Green. The majority of these operations were arrivals attributed to weather or air traffic delays at the originating airports. Figure 6: Late Night Operations, by Airline, 2nd Quarter 2005

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

# o

f O

pera

tio

ns

Am

eric

an

Contin

enta

l

Del

ta

Indep

enden

ce

Nort

hwes

t

Southwes

t

Spirit

Unite

d

US A

ir

3Q2004

4Q2004

1Q2005

2Q2005

Source: RIAC Operations Monitoring System, 2005

Quarterly Operations Report

Second Quarter 2005

Page 11 of 26

R h o d e I s l a n d A i r p o r t C o r p o r a t i o n

Airline operations comprise 69% of the total nighttime operations. These late night arrivals are predominantly arrivals of delayed flights occurring between midnight and 1:00 a.m. RIAC continues to work with the airlines to decrease the number of late night operations. Figure 7: Late Night Operations, by Aircraft Category, 2nd Quarter 2005

Airline

69%

Commuter

1%

Cargo

0%

Gen.

Aviation

30%

Airline Commuter Gen. Aviation Cargo

Source: RIAC Operations Logs, 2005

Part 150 Noise Abatement Corridor Compliance The Part 150 Noise Study Update recommended the implementation of noise abatement departure corridors to limit the number of persons adversely affected by aircraft noise near T. F. Green. After an FAA Environmental Impact Statement, RIAC implemented the use of noise abatement corridors beginning in June 2001. There are a total of eight corridors, comprised of at least one departure corridor per runway and one arrival corridor for Runway 34. For most runway ends; there are two flight tracks that jet aircraft may follow. The heading they are issued is based on their destination. The flight corridors are depicted in Figures 8 and 9:

Quarterly Operations Report

Second Quarter 2005

Page 12 of 26

R h o d e I s l a n d A i r p o r t C o r p o r a t i o n

Figure 8: Part 150 Noise Abatement Departure Corridors

Source: FAA, EIS for T. F. Green Air Traffic Control Noise Abatement Procedures, 2000

Quarterly Operations Report

Second Quarter 2005

Page 13 of 26

R h o d e I s l a n d A i r p o r t C o r p o r a t i o n

Runway 5: Northbound Departures (D5NA): Jet aircraft will turn left as soon as practicable after passing runway end to fly a 360-degreee heading until reaching 3 DME (Distance Measuring Equipment). Southbound Departures (D5SB): Jet aircraft will turn right to a 080-degree heading until reaching 3 DME, passing over Passeonkquis Cove, Gaspee Point Beach and Narrangansett Bay. Runway 23: Northbound Departures (D2SA): Jet aircraft will turn left as soon as practicable after passing runway end to a 160-degree heading until reaching 5 DME or intercepting the 180-degree radial (whichever occurs first). This measure is intended to route traffic over Greenwich Bay and along the north edge of Goddard Memorial State Park. Southbound Departures (D2NA): Jet aircraft will turn right as soon as practicable after passing runway end to a 280-degree heading until reaching 3 DME. This measure is intended to direct departures under 3,000’ over compatible land use areas in Apponaug along I-95 and SR 115. Runway 16: Southbound Departures (D1SA): Jet aircraft will turn right to a 180-degree heading until reaching 3 DME or intercepting the PVD VORTAC 180-degree radial. This measure is intended to direct departures over compatible land use areas along Brush Creek Cove and Greenwich Bay. Runway 34: Northbound Departures (D3NA): Jet aircraft will turn left as soon as practicable after passing runway end to a 330-degree heading until reaching 4 DME. This measure is intended to direct departures along compatible land use areas located along SR37 and I-295. Southbound Departures (D3SA): Jet aircraft will turn right to a 360-degree heading until reaching 3 DME. This measure is intended to direct departures along compatible land use areas along I-95 and the Pawtuxet River corridors. Runway 34: Arrivals (A3SA): Jet aircraft will intercept the final approach course before crossing the shoreline at Rocky Point Beach on Warwick Neck (4 DME from the PVD VORTAC). This measure is intended to keep jet aircraft following the same course along the extended runway centerline from beyond the shoreline.

Quarterly Operations Report

Second Quarter 2005

Page 14 of 26

R h o d e I s l a n d A i r p o r t C o r p o r a t i o n

Figure 9: Part 150 Noise Abatement Arrivals Corridor

Source: FAA, EIS for T. F. Green Air Traffic Control Noise Abatement Procedures, 2000

Quarterly Operations Report

Second Quarter 2005

Page 15 of 26

R h o d e I s l a n d A i r p o r t C o r p o r a t i o n

An analysis of each air carrier and their compliance with these departures corridors was conducted utilizing the Aircraft Operations Monitoring System3. Overal compliance by the air and cargo carriers is 98% with no air carrier achieving less than 96% compliance and cargo carriers achieving 92% or higher compliance of maintaining flight tracks within the corridors. Table 3: Noise Abatement Departure Corridor Total Compliance by Airline, 2nd Quarter, 2005, All Runways

# of Departures4 Airline Rwy 5 Rwy 23 Rwy 16 Rwy 34 Total

Flight Tracks

# of Deviations5

% of Compliance

Air Carriers

American 177 224 10 17 428 3 99% Continental 242 353 21 19 635 2 100% Delta 293 387 14 13 707 6 99% Independence 130 178 10 8 326 12 96%

Northwest 211 304 4 16 535 11 98%

Southwest 1,022 1,439 8 96 2,565 37 99% Spirit 107 132 6 5 250 6 98%

US Air 1,129 1,571 14 101 2,815 20 99% United 163 208 8 6 385 15 96% Total 3,474 4,796 95 281 8,646 112 99%

Cargo Carriers

Airborne Express

22 54 0 4 82 3 96%

Federal Express

17 40 0 0 57 1 98%

UPS 43 29 0 2 74 6 92% Total 82 123 0 66 213 10 95% Source: RIAC, Aircraft Operations Monitoring System, 2005

3 During the quarter, the AOMS software was upgraded to improve data collection and runway matching algorithms. This

resulted in the need for the data to be reprocessed to maximize the accuracy of the data. There were also approximately

8 days in which the system did not collect data. Therefore, the total number of operations captured by the AOMS is less

than the total number of operations reported by the air carriers or the Air Traffic Control Tower.

4 Total number of departures as recorded by the AOMS.

5 Detailed listings of each airline’s deviations are provided in Appendix 1.

Quarterly Operations Reports

Second Quarter 2005

Page 16 of 26

R h o d e I s l a n d A i r p o r t C o r p o r a t i o n

A detailed analysis of compliance by runway end shows that the airlines and cargo operators achieve a high level of compliance with the noise abatement procedures. Table 4: Noise Abatement Departure Corridor Compliance for Runway 5, by Airline, 2nd Quarter 20056

Northbound Departures Southbound Departures Airline Total Departures

# of Deviations

% of Compliance

Total Departures

# of Deviations

% of Compliance

Total Runway Compliance

Air Carriers

American 154 1 100% 23 0 100% 99% Continental 242 0 100% 1 1 0% 100% Delta 290 1 100% 3 0 100% 100% Independence 128 6 95% 2 0 100% 95% Northwest 211 9 96% 0 0 N/A 96% Southwest 731 15 98% 291 1 100% 99% Spirit 40 1 98% 67 0 100% 99% US Air 478 10 98 375 7 98% 98 United 162 10 94% 1 1 0% 93% Total Air Carriers 2,436 53 98% 763 10 99% 98%

Cargo Carriers

Airborne Express/DHL 22 3 86% 0 0 N/A N/A Federal Express 17 1 94% 0 0 N/A N/A UPS 14 1 93% 29 0 100% 86% Total Cargo Carriers 53 5 91% 29 5 83% 88%

Total 2,489 58 98% 792 15 98% 98%

6 Specific Information regarding the deviations from the approved noise abatement departures corridors can be found in Appendix 1.

Quarterly Operations Reports

Second Quarter 2005

Page 17 of 26

R h o d e I s l a n d A i r p o r t C o r p o r a t i o n

Table 5: Noise Abatement Departure Corridor Compliance for Runway 23, by Airline, 2nd Quarter 20057

Northbound Departures Southbound Departures Airline Total Departures

# of Deviations

% of Compliance

Total Departures

# of Deviations

% of Compliance

Total Runway Compliance

Air Carriers

American 190 0 100% 34 0 100% 100% Continental 352 1 100% 1 0 100% 100% Delta 376 5 99% 11 0 100% 99% Independence 171 6 97% 7 0 100% 97% Northwest 300 2 99% 4 0 100% 99% Southwest 969 1 98% 470 0 100% 98% Spirit 49 0 100% 83 5 94% 96% US Air 971 2 100% 502 2 100% 100% United 207 4 98% 1 1 0% 98% Total Air Carriers 3,585 32 99% 1,113 12 99% 99%

Cargo Carriers

Airborne Express 52 0 100% 2 1 50% 98% Federal Express 38 0 100% 2 0 100% 100% UPS 29 5 83% 0 0 100% 83% Total Cargo Carriers 119 5 96% 4 1 75% 96%

Total 3,704 37 99% 1,117 13 99% 99%

7 Specific Information regarding the deviations from the approved noise abatement departures corridors can be found in Appendix 1.

Quarterly Operations Reports

Second Quarter 2005

Page 18 of 26

R h o d e I s l a n d A i r p o r t C o r p o r a t i o n

Table 6: Noise Abatement Departure Corridor Compliance for Runway 34, by Airline, 2nd Quarter 20058 Northbound Departures Southbound Departures Airline Total Departures

# of Deviations

% of Compliance

Total Departures

# of Deviations

% of Compliance

Total Runway Compliance

Air Carriers

American 10 1 90% 7 0 N/A 90% Continental 19 0 100% 0 0 N/A 100% Delta 13 0 100% 0 0 N/A 100% Independence 8 0 100% 0 0 N/A 100% Northwest 16 0 100% 0 0 N/A 100% Southwest 69 2 97% 27 3 88% 95% Spirit 4 0 100% 1 0 100% 100% US Air 35 3 91% 22 0 100% 95% United 6 0 100% 0 0 N/A 100% Total Air Carriers 180 6 97% 57 3 95% 96%

Cargo Carriers

Airborne Express 4 0 100% 0 0 N/A 100% Federal Express 0 0 N/A 0 0 N/A 100% UPS 2 0 100% 0 0 N/A 100% Total Cargo Carriers 6 0 100% 0 0 N/A 100%

Total 186 6 97% 57 3 95% 96%

8 Specific Information regarding the deviations from the approved noise abatement departures corridors can be found in Appendix 1.

Quarterly Operations Reports

Second Quarter 2005

Page 19 of 26

R h o d e I s l a n d A i r p o r t C o r p o r a t i o n

Table 7: Noise Abatement Departure Corridor Compliance for Runway 16, by Airline, 2nd Quarter 20059

Departures Airline Total Departures

# of Deviations

% of Compliance

Air Carriers

American 10 1 90% Continental 21 0 100% Delta 14 0 100% Independence 10 0 100% Northwest 4 0 100% Southwest 8 0 100% Spirit 6 0 100% US Air 44 2 95% United 8 2 75% Total Air Carriers 125 5 96%

Cargo Carriers

Airborne Express 0 0 N/A Federal Express 0 0 N/A UPS 0 0 N/A Total Cargo Carriers 0 0 N/A

Total 125 5 96% There is one arrival corridor designed for Runway 34. There were no deviations by any of the airlines in the utilization of this corridor.

9 Specific Information regarding the deviations from the approved noise abatement departures corridors can be found in Appendix 1.

Quarterly Operations Report

Second Quarter 2005

Page 20 of 26

R h o d e I s l a n d A i r p o r t C o r p o r a t i o n

Noise Complaints RIAC has instituted several methods for citizens concerned about aircraft noise to voice their opinions. RIAC is committed to minimizing the effects of aircraft generated noise on the Warwick and Cranston Communities through the use of operational procedures and noise mitigation programs. Citizens can call the noise hotline and leave a message, submit a complaint via the web page or call the noise office directly. Figure 10: Total Noise Complaints by Quarter, 2004-2005

Noise Complaints

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

3Q2004 4Q2004 1Q2005 2Q2005

Quarters

# o

f C

alls

Source: RIAC Operations Monitoring System, 2005

As seen in Figure 10, during the Second Quarter 2005, RIAC received 292 complaints from 91 callers. Of these calls, 118 complaints or 40% were received from a single household. The 3rd quarter, when the weather is warmest is typically when most complaints are received. This is due to the fact that individuals have their homes open and are enjoying the summer weather.

Quarterly Operations Report

Second Quarter 2005

Page 21 of 26

R h o d e I s l a n d A i r p o r t C o r p o r a t i o n

APPENDIX A:

Air Carriers

American Total Deviations 3

Runway 5: Date Time Flight 5/9 9:23 a.m. 1555 Runway 16: 4/18 5:41 p.m. 607 Runway 34: 5/30 5:35 p.m. 607

Continental Total Deviations 2

Runway 5: Date Time Flight 5/17 7:07 a.m. 260 Runway 23: 4/29 7:07 a.m. 260

Delta Total Deviations 6

Runway 5: Date Time Flight 6/22 6:01 p.m. 927 Runway 23: 4/17 11:31 a.m. 1707 4/19 5:43 p.m. 927 5/14 6:08 a.m. 535 5/28 6/04 a.m. 535 6/04 11:40 a.m. 1849

Independence Total Deviations 12

Runway 5: Date Time Flight 4/15 11:41 a.m. 1636 4/30 4:09 p.m. 1638 5/1 6:13 a.m. 1635 5/15 6:08 a.m. 1635 5/24 5:56 p.m. 1640 5/29 5:41 p.m. 1640

Quarterly Operations Report

Second Quarter 2005

Page 22 of 26

R h o d e I s l a n d A i r p o r t C o r p o r a t i o n

Independence Total Deviations 12

Runway 23: Date Time Flight 5/4 5:23 p.m. 1640 5/14 10:35 a.m. 1636 6/17 6:02 a.m. 1635 6/18 5:14 a.m. 1640 6/28 11:06 a.m. 1636 6/29 6:28 a.m. 1635

Northwest Total Deviations 11

Runway 5: Date Time Flight 4/2 12:22 p.m. 1445 4/23 9:15 a.m. 1833 5/7 8:13 a.m. 1963 5/18 8:06 p.m. 1963 5/24 6:12 p.m. 625 5/25 9:15 a.m. 1443 5/25 7:38 p.m. 1441 5/30 6:13 p.m. 625 6/22 6:23 p.m. 1273 Runway 23: 5/2 4:09 p.m. 261 5/20 8:05 a.m. 1963

Southwest Total Deviations 37

Runway 5: Date Time Flight 4/16 8:28 a.m. 1112 4/21 8:31 a.m. 1112 4/23 7:35 a.m. 341 5/7 7:20 a.m. 1508 5/7 7:30 a.m. 341 5/7 8:52 a.m. 1112 5/8 7:28 a.m. 341 5/8 2:00 p.m. 377 5/15 8:02 p.m. 1824 5/21 11:40 a.m. 625 5/24 3:50 p.m. 717 5/25 2:26 p.m. 1776 5/29 6:09 p.m. 1159 5/30 6:18 p.m. 75 6/1 6:40 a.m. 9091

Quarterly Operations Report

Second Quarter 2005

Page 23 of 26

R h o d e I s l a n d A i r p o r t C o r p o r a t i o n

Southwest Total Deviations 37

6/19 9:06 a.m. 1226 Runway 23: 4/5 6:38 a.m. 9037 4/16 8:53 p.m. 75 4/21 5:24 p.m. 1721 4/23 11:12 a.m. 2221 4/23 12:31 a.m. 2162 5/14 7:31 a.m. 341 5/14 8:31 a.m. 1654 5/18 4:00 p.m. 717 5/28 11:30a.m. 2221 5/29 8:20 a.m. 3295 6/12 6:51 p.m. 2802 6/13 1:51 p.m. 2160 6/13 6:58 a.m. 430 6/16 8:34 p.m. 1824 6/28 9:46 p.m. 2162 6/30 12:31 a.m. 2162 Runway 34: 4/5 5:28 p.m. 2161 4/16 9:18 p.m. 2027 5/12 10:07 a.m. 1287 5/30 5:17 p.m. 2161 5/30 5:25 p.m. 1721

Spirit Total Deviations 6

Runway 5: Date Time Flight 4/30 9:15 a.m. 247 Runway 23: 5/15 3:37 p.m. 219 5/30 3:39 p.m. 219 6/16 3:28 p.m. 219 6/25 8:10 a.m. 215 6/27 8:09 a.m. 215

US Air Total Deviations 27

Runway 5: Date Time Flight 4/14 9:19 p.m. 276 4/14 4:47 p.m. 59 4/14 7:18 p.m. 8065 4/16 9:12 a.m. 3543

Quarterly Operations Report

Second Quarter 2005

Page 24 of 26

R h o d e I s l a n d A i r p o r t C o r p o r a t i o n

US Air Total Deviations 27

4/16 1:43 p.m. 3543 4/28 6:07 a.m. 243 5/7 6:31 a.m. 8047 5/10 7:22 p.m. 951 5/12 7:19 p.m. 951 5/17 6:09 a.m. 3535 5/18 7:11 a.m. 8047 5/19 4:55 p.m. 8065 5/24 6:21 p.m. 951 5/25 9:05 p.m. 311 5/25 8:58 p.m. 1621 5/25 7:45 p.m. 189 5/29 6:11 p.m. 275 Runway 23: 4/30 9:34 p.m. 1662 6/16 9:05 p.m. 311 6/20 4:44 p.m. 1630 6/22 7:53 a.m. 877 Runway 16: 4/24 7:57 p.m. 881 5/5 4:27 p.m. 59 Runway 34: 4/5 6:09 p.m. 575 4/14 9:13 p.m. 276 5/8 6:18 p.m. 1443

United Total Deviations 17

Runway 5: Date Time Flight 4/9 11:34 a.m. 719 4/16 6:39 a.m. 139 5/2 11:35 p.m. 719 5/7 7:41 a.m. 421 5/9 6:12 p.m. 515 5/25 3:18 p.m. 6951 6/14 4:46 p.m. 6825 5/12 2:02 p.m. 421 5/17 9:39 a.m. 355 5/29 5:34 p.m. 515 6/19 7:14 a.m. 1173 Runway 23: 4/25 11:31 a.m. 719 4/24 11:58 a.m. 719

Quarterly Operations Report

Second Quarter 2005

Page 25 of 26

R h o d e I s l a n d A i r p o r t C o r p o r a t i o n

United Total Deviations 17

4/23 6:15 p.m. 753 6/3 9:36 a.m. 355 Runway 16: 4/24 8:53 a.m. 433 5/11 6:14 p.m. 515

Quarterly Operations Report

Second Quarter 2005

Page 26 of 26

R h o d e I s l a n d A i r p o r t C o r p o r a t i o n

Cargo Carriers

Airborne Express Total Deviations 3

Runway 5: Date Time Flight 5/24 6:55 a.m. 177 5/25 8:42 p.m. 177 6/16 9:00 p.m. 177

Federal Express Total Deviations 1

Runway 5: Date Time Flight 5/25 9:22 p.m. 1254

UPS Total Deviations 6

Runway 5: Date Time Flight 5/24 8:35 p.m. 29 Runway 23: 4/7 8:32 p.m. 29

4/25 8:30 p.m. 29

4/26 8:24 p.m. 29

4/28 8:26 p.m. 29

6/02 8:35 p.m. 29