+ All Categories
Home > Documents > New strategies to create technologically relevant ......two-layer systems H0-4: contact angle...

New strategies to create technologically relevant ......two-layer systems H0-4: contact angle...

Date post: 04-Feb-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
R1-3, S1-6: pronounced micro-/nano- structure 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 H3/4 H0/1/2 R3 R1/2 S1 S2 S3/4 adv H 2 O rec H 2 O adv HD rec HD [°] r W S5/6 S7 preparation of coatings by sol-gel process with functional nanofillers investigation of morphology and roughness on different length scales by confocal microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), scanning force microscopy (AFM) measurement of advancing and receding contact angles of water, wather-ethanol mixtures and n-hexadecane wet abrasion test similar to DIN EN ISO 11998 topography (SEM images of selected coatings) low magnification high magnification superomniphobic, self-cleaning surface coatings are interes- ting for various applications (windows, solar panels, facades) superhydrophobicity is obtained by hydrophobic surfaces with high roughness (hierarchical or fractal structure) [1] problem: mechanical stability superoleophobicity requires high roughness, high aspect ratio and re-entrant structures [2, 3] Background references summary This work was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research within the project „NanoStruk - Superhydrophobe und oleophobe Beschichtungen mit Nanolacken auf Edelstahl“, support code 03X0154B. New strategies to create technologically relevant superomniphobic coatings on sol-gel base A. Drechsler 1 , K. Estel 1 , A. Caspari 1 , C. Bellmann 1 , J. Harenburg 2 , F. Meier 2 , M. Zschuppe 2 1 Leibniz-Institut für Polymerforschung Dresden e.V., Hohe Straße 6, 01069 Dresden, Germany 2 FEW Chemicals GmbH, ChemiePark Bitterfeld Wolfen, Areal A Technikumstraße 1, 06766 Wolfen, Germany Leibniz Institute of Polymer Research Dresden, Hohe Str. 6, D-01069 Dresden, Germany www.ipfdd.de contact: [email protected] creation of superhydrophobic, oleophobic surface coatings by technologically relevant sol-gel process [4]with nanofillers systematic investigation of the correlations between surface topography / roughness and wettability test of mechanical stability Goal Acknowledgment 1. A. Synytska, L. Ionov, K. Grundke, M. Stamm, Wetting on Fractal Superhydrophobic Surfaces from “Core-Shell” Particles: A Comparison of Theory and Experiment, Langmuir 25 (2009) 3132-3136. 2. A. Tuteja, W. Choi, M. Ma, J.M. Mabry, S.A. Mazzella, G.C. Rutledge, G.H. McKinley, R.E. Cohen, Designing Superoleophobic Surfaces, Science 318 (2007) 1618-1622. 3. R. Hensel, R. Helbig, S. Aland, H.-G. Braun, A. Voigt, C. Neinhuis, C. Werner, Wetting Resistance at Its Topographical Limit: The Benefit of Mushroom and Serif T Structures, Langmuir 29 (2013) 11001112. 4. C.J. Brinker, G.W. Scherer, Sol-Gel Science The Physics and Chemistry of Sol-Gel Processing, Academic Press, Inc., 1990. Methods Superomniphobic coatings can be prepared on technical scale by sol-gel technique with additives and nanofillers. single-layer coatings with nanofillers: hierarchical structure on various length scales superhydrophobic, oleophobic behavior single-layer coatings sprayed on heated substrate: high aspect ratio, pronounced microstructure, re-entrant structures, low defect density superhydrophobic, superoleophobic behavior, (if full surface coverage, low defect density) superomniphobicity reached with micro- and nanostructured coatings sprayed on heated substrates two-layer systems: + low fluorine content, better mechanical stability insatisfactory wetting behavior mechanical stability decreases with increasing roughness, aspect ratio and microstructure roughness has to be optimized with regard to wetting behavior asperities act as "sacrificial layer", protect micro- structure in the voids superhydrophobicity is maintained after wet abrasion test fluorine additives basic formulation "H 1006"* basic formulation "H 5055"* fluoropolymer nanoparticles inorganic pigments (microfillers) two-layer coatings H0-H4 base coat: blend of "H 1006", inorganic fillers, polyethylene; sprayed, cross-linked (150°C) roughness adjusted by particle size, mixing ratio top coat: "H 5055", sprayed, cross-linked (150°C) single-layer coatings R1-R3 acid-catalyzed hydrolysis and condensation products of functionalized (fluoro)silanes, fluorine additive and fluoropolymer nanoparticles, cross-linked (150°C) prepared by doctor blade (variation of thickness) single-layer coatings S1-S6, S7 acid-catalyzed hydrolysis and condensation products of functionalized (fluoro)silanes, fluorine additive and fluoropolymer nanoparticles, cross-linked (150°C) prepared by spraying (variation of sprayed mass, temp.) sol-gel process preparation of the sol-gel coatings 20 μm H1: low roughness H3: medium roughness R1: film thickness 11 μm R3: film thickness 22 μm S1: spr. on cold substrate S6 sprayed on warm substrate S7 1 μm 20 μm 20 μm 1 μm 1 μm H0-4: no micro-/nanostructure S7: only nanostructure 0 5 10 15 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 H4 H3 H2 H1 H0 wear [g/m²] r q [μm] R3 S1 S2 S3 S7 S6 S4 S5 R1 R2 wetting mechanical stability advancing and receding contact angles of water and hexadecane vs. Wenzel roughness r W coating R1: advancing and receding contact angles of water-ethanol mixtures vs. liquid surface tension lv wear of the sol-gel coatings after wet abrasion test vs. root mean square roughness r q performed by * commercial products by FEW Chemicals two-layer systems H0-4: contact angle hysteresis of water and hexadecane increases with roughness Wenzel regime single-layer systems with microstructure R1-3, S1-6: water: Cassie regime; hexadecane: transition from Wenzel to Cassie regime for r W > 5 (not for S7!) Wenzel regime Cassie regime macroscopically smooth blade-coated single-layer coating R1 with microstructure repels all liquids with surface tensions lv > 40 mN/m (Cassie regime) mechanical stability decreases with increasing roughness; lower wear for coatings without microstructure (H0-4, S7) asperities of sprayed coatings protect microstructure in the voids coating remains superhydrophobic, oleophobic coating S6 after abrasion test functional micro- and nanofillers to increase contact angles and roughness and create re-entrant structures 20 μm
Transcript
  • R1-3, S1-6: pronounced micro-/nano- structure

    1 2 3 4 5 6 70

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    H3

    /4

    H0

    /1/2

    R3

    R1

    /2

    S1

    S2

    S3

    /4

    adv

    H2O

    rec

    H2O

    adv

    HD

    rec

    HD

    [°]

    rW

    S5

    /6

    S7

    • preparation of coatings by sol-gel process with functional nanofillers

    • investigation of morphology and roughness on different length

    scales by confocal microscopy, scanning electron microscopy

    (SEM), scanning force microscopy (AFM)

    • measurement of advancing and receding contact angles of water,

    wather-ethanol mixtures and n-hexadecane

    • wet abrasion test similar to DIN EN ISO 11998

    topography

    (SEM images

    of selected

    coatings)

    low magnification

    high magnification

    • superomniphobic, self-cleaning surface coatings are interes-

    ting for various applications (windows, solar panels, facades)

    • superhydrophobicity is obtained by hydrophobic surfaces with

    high roughness (hierarchical or fractal structure) [1]

    problem: mechanical stability

    • superoleophobicity requires high roughness, high aspect ratio

    and re-entrant structures [2, 3]

    Background

    references

    summary

    This work was funded by the German

    Federal Ministry of Education and

    Research within the project „NanoStruk

    - Superhydrophobe und oleophobe

    Beschichtungen mit Nanolacken auf

    Edelstahl“, support code 03X0154B.

    New strategies to create technologically relevant

    superomniphobic coatings on sol-gel base A. Drechsler1, K. Estel1, A. Caspari1, C. Bellmann1, J. Harenburg2, F. Meier2, M. Zschuppe2

    1Leibniz-Institut für Polymerforschung Dresden e.V., Hohe Straße 6, 01069 Dresden, Germany 2FEW Chemicals GmbH, ChemiePark Bitterfeld Wolfen, Areal A – Technikumstraße 1, 06766 Wolfen, Germany

    Leibniz Institute of Polymer Research Dresden,

    Hohe Str. 6, D-01069 Dresden, Germany

    www.ipfdd.de

    contact: [email protected]

    • creation of superhydrophobic, oleophobic

    surface coatings by technologically relevant

    sol-gel process [4]with nanofillers

    • systematic investigation of the correlations

    between surface topography / roughness

    and wettability

    • test of mechanical stability

    Goal

    Acknowledgment 1. A. Synytska, L. Ionov, K. Grundke, M. Stamm, Wetting on Fractal Superhydrophobic Surfaces from “Core-Shell” Particles: A Comparison of Theory and Experiment, Langmuir 25 (2009) 3132-3136.

    2. A. Tuteja, W. Choi, M. Ma, J.M. Mabry, S.A. Mazzella, G.C. Rutledge, G.H. McKinley, R.E. Cohen, Designing

    Superoleophobic Surfaces, Science 318 (2007) 1618-1622.

    3. R. Hensel, R. Helbig, S. Aland, H.-G. Braun, A. Voigt, C. Neinhuis, C. Werner, Wetting Resistance at Its

    Topographical Limit: The Benefit of Mushroom and Serif T Structures, Langmuir 29 (2013) 1100−1112.

    4. C.J. Brinker, G.W. Scherer, Sol-Gel Science – The Physics and Chemistry of Sol-Gel Processing, Academic

    Press, Inc., 1990.

    Methods

    Superomniphobic coatings can be prepared on technical scale by sol-gel technique with additives and nanofillers.

    single-layer coatings with nanofillers:

    • hierarchical structure on various length scales

    • superhydrophobic, oleophobic behavior

    single-layer coatings sprayed on heated substrate:

    • high aspect ratio, pronounced microstructure,

    re-entrant structures, low defect density

    superhydrophobic, superoleophobic behavior,

    (if full surface coverage, low defect density)

    superomniphobicity reached with

    micro- and nanostructured coatings

    sprayed on heated substrates

    two-layer systems:

    + low fluorine content, better mechanical stability

    insatisfactory wetting behavior

    mechanical stability

    • decreases with increasing roughness, aspect ratio and

    microstructure

    • roughness has to be optimized with regard to wetting

    behavior

    • asperities act as "sacrificial layer", protect micro-

    structure in the voids superhydrophobicity is

    maintained after wet abrasion test

    fluorine additives basic formulation

    "H 1006"*

    basic formulation

    "H 5055"* fluoropolymer

    nanoparticles

    inorganic pigments

    (microfillers)

    two-layer coatings H0-H4 base coat: blend of "H 1006", inorganic fillers, polyethylene;

    sprayed, cross-linked (150°C)

    roughness adjusted by particle size, mixing ratio top coat: "H 5055", sprayed, cross-linked (150°C)

    single-layer coatings R1-R3 acid-catalyzed hydrolysis and condensation products of

    functionalized (fluoro)silanes, fluorine additive and

    fluoropolymer nanoparticles, cross-linked (150°C)

    prepared by doctor blade (variation of thickness)

    single-layer coatings S1-S6, S7 acid-catalyzed hydrolysis and condensation products of

    functionalized (fluoro)silanes, fluorine additive and

    fluoropolymer nanoparticles, cross-linked (150°C)

    prepared by spraying (variation of sprayed mass, temp.)

    sol-gel process

    preparation of

    the sol-gel

    coatings

    20 µm

    H1: low roughness H3: medium roughness R1: film thickness 11 µm R3: film thickness 22 µm S1: spr. on cold substrate S6 sprayed on warm substrate S7

    1 µm

    20 µm 20 µm

    1 µm 1 µm

    H0-4: no micro-/nanostructure S7: only nanostructure

    0 5 10 15 20

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    H4H3H2H1

    H0

    wear

    [g/m

    ²]

    rq [µm]

    R3S1

    S2

    S3

    S7

    S6

    S4

    S5

    R1

    R2

    wetting

    mechanical

    stability

    advancing and receding contact angles of water

    and hexadecane vs. Wenzel roughness rW

    coating R1: advancing and receding contact angles of

    water-ethanol mixtures vs. liquid surface tension lv

    wear of the sol-gel coatings after wet abrasion

    test vs. root mean square roughness rq

    performed by

    * commercial products by FEW Chemicals

    two-layer systems H0-4: contact angle hysteresis of water

    and hexadecane increases with roughness Wenzel regime

    single-layer systems with microstructure R1-3, S1-6:

    water: Cassie regime; hexadecane: transition from Wenzel to

    Cassie regime for rW > 5 (not for S7!)

    Wenzel regime

    Cassie regime

    macroscopically smooth blade-coated single-layer

    coating R1 with microstructure repels all liquids with

    surface tensions lv > 40 mN/m (Cassie regime)

    mechanical stability decreases with increasing roughness;

    • lower wear for coatings without microstructure (H0-4, S7)

    • asperities of sprayed coatings protect microstructure in the

    voids coating remains superhydrophobic, oleophobic

    coating S6 after

    abrasion test

    functional micro- and nanofillers to

    increase contact angles and roughness

    and create re-entrant structures

    20 µm


Recommended