+ All Categories
Home > Documents > New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey...

New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey...

Date post: 16-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: maximilian-sirman
View: 217 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
26
New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington
Transcript
Page 1: New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington.

New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults

Tom Brocher and Brian SherrodU.S. Geological Survey

Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington

Page 2: New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington.

Cascadia eq types

{Not anEarthquake!

Page 3: New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington.

Puget Lowland is being squeezed from south to north at a rate of about 1/4 inch/year(6 mm/yr)

1/4 in/yr

Page 4: New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington.

Typical fold type

Future fault

Fault

Page 5: New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington.

The Prevailing Model

Faults move at depth

Page 6: New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington.

Two Problems

1)Surface faults are up to the north not to the south

2) Tacoma fault not yet recognized

Page 7: New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington.

Seismic Hazard Investigations in Puget Sound (SHIPS)

March 1998

Page 8: New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington.

2 miles below we can see the Tacoma and Seattle basins, a ridge between them, and evidence for a sharp contrast across the Tacoma fault

Pink symbols show uplift/subsidence at ~AD900

Page 9: New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington.

By folding and faulting!!

SHIPS Tomography

Page 10: New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington.

A more complex fold type

Wedge tip

One sided fold

(monocline)

Page 11: New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington.

Folding along Seattle fault

Page 12: New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington.

A New View

You areHere!!

18 24

Distance (miles)

Page 13: New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington.

Depth in miles to the main faults

Seattle fault

Tacoma fault

Unlike in California,faults here dip gentlyso that the entireregion between Seattleand Tacoma is underlainat shallow depth by anactive fault

Seattle

Page 14: New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington.

Seattle fault zone

Downtown Seattle

Seattlefaultzone

Page 15: New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington.

Seattle fault zone

Wedge tip

Page 16: New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington.

Seattle fault and folds

Page 17: New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington.

Seismic hazard issues

Faulting towards SeattleBasin effectsShallow faulting Shallow foldingUpliftLocal tsunamisLandslides

Wedge tip

Page 18: New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington.

Seattle fault zone - AD 900

Blake Island

M6.4

M7.2

Shallow splay faults

Page 19: New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington.

Shallow splay faults

Shallow splay faults only slip when the master floor thrusts slip - they do not represent independent seismic sources. Paleo slip on them tells us about slip on the floor thrusts.

Shallow splay faults

Page 20: New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington.

Other wedges (Pakistan)

Page 21: New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington.

Flatirons of Boulder, Colorado

Page 22: New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington.

Widespread movement 900 AD

Olympia

Seattle

Tacoma

Page 23: New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington.

Vancouver

Seattle

Tacoma

Phase

II

Page 24: New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington.

Phase II results:

Delineated the Seattle basin

Recorded 1999 Chi-Chi EQ

Identified basin amplification atlow frequencies andattenuation at higher frequencies of weakground motions

Page 25: New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington.

Vancouver

Seattle

Tacoma

Phase

III

Page 26: New Views of the Seattle and Tacoma Faults Tom Brocher and Brian Sherrod U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, California and Seattle, Washington.

Phase

III

Frankel


Recommended