Date post: | 03-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | osborne-baker |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 0 times |
New Worlds New Worlds OccultersOcculters
Webster CashWebster CashUniversity of University of
ColoradoColoradoSeptember 29, September 29,
20062006
New Worlds ContributorsNew Worlds ContributorsWebster Cash University of ColoradoJim GreenEric SchindhelmJeremy Kasdin Princeton UniversityBob VanderbeiDavid SpergelSara Seager Carnegie Institution – WashingtonAlan Stern Southwest Research Institute – BoulderSteve Kilston Ball AerospaceTom BankCharlie NoeckerJim LeitchJon Arenberg Northrop GrummanRon PolidanChuck LillieAmy LoGlenn Starkman Case WesternSally Heap Goddard Space Flight CenterMarc KuchnerKeith Gendreau
and growing…
Important CaveatsImportant Caveats New Worlds is an emerging mission conceptNew Worlds is an emerging mission concept
Rapidly developing with a small teamRapidly developing with a small team Recent emphasis was on Discovery proposal, Recent emphasis was on Discovery proposal,
not a TPF-C class missionnot a TPF-C class mission TPF mission under very active studyTPF mission under very active study There is no mission design or final conceptThere is no mission design or final concept
We have found no obvious impediments to such a We have found no obvious impediments to such a missionmission
It is a major goal of this talk to inform the It is a major goal of this talk to inform the audience on how occulters do and do not audience on how occulters do and do not workwork
Given the limited time here, the results are Given the limited time here, the results are sample of the work that has been donesample of the work that has been done
Overview of the Occulter Overview of the Occulter HourHour
Development and performance of the Development and performance of the occulter (Cash-CU)occulter (Cash-CU)
Occulter modeling (Lyon-GSFC)Occulter modeling (Lyon-GSFC) Overview of architecture trades Overview of architecture trades
(Arenberg-NGST)(Arenberg-NGST) Alignment (Noecker-Ball)Alignment (Noecker-Ball) Summary (Arenberg-NGST)Summary (Arenberg-NGST)
Origin: 2002-2003Origin: 2002-2003 Maxim was stalledMaxim was stalled
Still isStill is Maxim was outgrowth of 1999-2001 NIACMaxim was outgrowth of 1999-2001 NIAC
Was there a way to apply Maxim technology to a Was there a way to apply Maxim technology to a more immediate problem?more immediate problem?
Noticed that TPF and Maxim were both driven by the Noticed that TPF and Maxim were both driven by the need for high performance opticsneed for high performance optics
Personally, the only thing I find as exciting as Personally, the only thing I find as exciting as imaging a black hole is finding and imaging Earth-imaging a black hole is finding and imaging Earth-like planetslike planets
Decided to try my hand at the exo-planet gameDecided to try my hand at the exo-planet game
June 2003June 2003
Came up with the Pinhole camera ideaCame up with the Pinhole camera idea
It was not MAXIM, but a rather a refusion It was not MAXIM, but a rather a refusion and reapplication of the Maxim approachand reapplication of the Maxim approach
A Pinhole Camera Meets The Requirements:Perfect TransmissionNo Phase ErrorsScatter only from edges – can be very low
Large Distance Set by 0.01 arcsec requirementdiffraction: /D = .01” D = 10m
@500nmgeometric: F = D/tan(.01”) = 180,000km
““Standard” Observatory Views Standard” Observatory Views StarshadeStarshade
~1” resolution or somewhat better (not diffraction limited!)
High efficiency, low noise spectrograph (e.g. COS)
View Back Toward View Back Toward StarshadeStarshade
Background Stars & Zodiacal Light
Starshade
Diffracted Starlightaround edge fallsoutside slit
SpectrographEntrance Slit(Projected)
Planet Light
Background Stars & Zodiacal Light
Starshade
Diffracted Starlightaround edge fallsoutside slit
SpectrographEntrance Slit(Projected)
Planet Light
Planet Finding ModePlanet Finding ModeSolar System at 10pc
Survey to 7AU Survey Habitable Zone
Jupiter
Earth
Venus
Mars
Venus
Earth
Why Pinhole Why Pinhole Camera?Camera?
Why Not Occulter?Why Not Occulter?
Because Because
Everybody knows that Everybody knows that diffraction around an diffraction around an occulter is too severeocculter is too severe
OccultersOcculters Several previous programs have looked at occultersSeveral previous programs have looked at occulters
First look by Spitzer (1962)First look by Spitzer (1962) Marchal (1985) Used simple petal shapesMarchal (1985) Used simple petal shapes
Achieved 10Achieved 10-5-5 suppression across a broad spectral band suppression across a broad spectral band With transmissive shadesWith transmissive shades
Achieved only 10Achieved only 10-5-5 suppression despite scatter problem suppression despite scatter problem
http://umbras.org/BOSS Starkman (TRW ca 2000)
Extinguishing Extinguishing
Poisson’s SpotPoisson’s Spot SimpleSimple Occulters Have Very Poor Diffraction Performance Occulters Have Very Poor Diffraction Performance
The 1818 Prediction of Fresnel led to the famous episode of:The 1818 Prediction of Fresnel led to the famous episode of: Poisson’s Spot (variously Arago’s Spot)Poisson’s Spot (variously Arago’s Spot) Occulters Often Concentrate Light!Occulters Often Concentrate Light!
Must satisfy Fresnel Equation, Not Just the Fraunhoffer EquationMust satisfy Fresnel Equation, Not Just the Fraunhoffer Equation
Must Create a Zone That Is:Must Create a Zone That Is: Deep Deep Below 10Below 10-10-10 diffraction diffraction Wide Wide A couple meters minimumA couple meters minimum Broad Broad Suppress across at least one octave of spectrumSuppress across at least one octave of spectrum
Must Be PracticalMust Be Practical Binary Binary Non-transmitting to avoid scatterNon-transmitting to avoid scatter Size Size Below 150m DiameterBelow 150m Diameter Tolerance Tolerance Insensitive to microscopic errorsInsensitive to microscopic errors
The Vanderbei FlowerThe Vanderbei Flower Developed for Aperture in TPF focal planeDeveloped for Aperture in TPF focal plane Was to be only millimeters acrossWas to be only millimeters across Vanderbei had determined it would work for Vanderbei had determined it would work for
the pinhole camera but did not necessarily the pinhole camera but did not necessarily work for occulter.work for occulter.
Agreement that it was worth a lookAgreement that it was worth a look
BreakthroughBreakthrough
From 11/17/04 to 4/12/05 worked on diffraction codesFrom 11/17/04 to 4/12/05 worked on diffraction codes Put the problem out there for whomever to solvePut the problem out there for whomever to solve
At one point had 3 professors, 2 engineers and 4 studentsAt one point had 3 professors, 2 engineers and 4 students On April 12 last year (after Phase I, before Phase II On April 12 last year (after Phase I, before Phase II
due)due) Had working codeHad working code Was trying functions (as opposed to VDB generalized forms)Was trying functions (as opposed to VDB generalized forms) Tried OFFSET gaussianTried OFFSET gaussian Ten minutes later had a solutionTen minutes later had a solution
In June discovered hyper-gaussians even betterIn June discovered hyper-gaussians even better
The Apodization The Apodization FunctionFunction
0A a
a 1
na
bA e
for
for
and
Found this in April. Extended in June.This Function Extinguishes Poisson’s Spot to High Precision
PerformancePerformanceA 50m diameter occulter at 50,000km will reveal Earths at 10pcA 50m diameter occulter at 50,000km will reveal Earths at 10pc
a=b=12.5mn=6F=50,000km
Arenberg and Cash (2005)
Occulters Are Occulters Are Fundamentally FresnelFundamentally Fresnel
(Never Ever Fraunhoffer)(Never Ever Fraunhoffer)
The central Fresnel zone and the eight inner half zones are The central Fresnel zone and the eight inner half zones are shown schematically. The dark star in the centre represents a shown schematically. The dark star in the centre represents a mask that is confined to the region where the Fraunhoffer mask that is confined to the region where the Fraunhoffer approximation can be used. It is clear that such a mask will approximation can be used. It is clear that such a mask will
integrate out to a net positive contribution in the focal plane.integrate out to a net positive contribution in the focal plane.
Suppression of Edge Diffraction Suppression of Edge Diffraction Can Be UnderstoodCan Be Understood
Using Fresnel Zones and GeometryUsing Fresnel Zones and Geometry
The occulter is a true binary opticThe occulter is a true binary optic Transmission is unity or nilTransmission is unity or nil
Edge diffraction from solid disk is Edge diffraction from solid disk is suppressed by cancellation suppressed by cancellation The power in the even zones cancels The power in the even zones cancels
the power in the odd zonesthe power in the odd zones Need enough zones to give good deep Need enough zones to give good deep
cancellationcancellation Sets the length of the petals Sets the length of the petals
Petal shape is exponential Petal shape is exponential b is scale of petal shapeb is scale of petal shape n is an index of petal shapen is an index of petal shape a is the diameter of the central circlea is the diameter of the central circle
ab
Fresnel ApproximationFresnel Approximation
2
2 2 cos20 2
0 0
,
iksik ik sikF F
F FE e e
E e A e d di F
2
22
0 20
0
iksikikF F
FE ke e k s
E e A J diF F
Then, if circularly symmetric:
Babinet’s PrincipleBabinet’s PrincipleNecessary for Integration Across ShadeNecessary for Integration Across Shade
0 1 2E E E
We seek E2=0 or:
2 1ikFE e E
1ikFE e
2
2
0
ikikF ikFF
ke A e d e
iF
2
2
0
1ik
Fk
A e diF
or
To simplify math we concentrate on the center of the shadow (s=0)
We seek A() such that:
or
Now, Evaluate Candidate Now, Evaluate Candidate Apodization FunctionApodization Function
n
a
bA e
1A
22
22
0
n
n
a ika ikFbF
a
k kE e d e d
iF iF
Electric Field at Center:Electric Field at Center:
22
22
0
1 1n
ii
E e d e di i
22
221
1
nii
E e e di
Integrate by PartsIntegrate by Parts
2 1
2
nni
R n e e d
Yields E = 1+R where R is small as desiredAnd
This closed-form integral represents the electric fieldat the center of the shadow
Continue Integrating by Continue Integrating by PartsParts
1! 1 1 !
n
n n n
n nR
Drop Small Terms
Dominant Term
If 2 >> n
Binary ApodizationBinary Apodization
a
b
b
a a
b
b
a
2 2 cos cos
2
0
,2
ik ik s ik s
F F F
a
kR e A e A e d d
F
Difference between petalsand circularly symmetric
apodization.
Tolerance AnalysisTolerance Analysis
Procedes by perturbation analysisProcedes by perturbation analysis Pitch or Yaw error – Pitch or Yaw error – foreshortened to 1-foreshortened to 1- in one dimension in one dimension
2
12
0
ni y
y nR n e e y dy
csRR
Reduces to:
Proving
2 2 2
22 2222
(1 )
2 2
11
2 2
(1 )
2
1
n
iky ikz
F F
ikF
y z aikziky b
F F
e e dydz
kE e
iF
e e e dydz
Where z=x/(1-)
Starshade Starshade TolerancesTolerances
PositionPosition LateralLateral Several MetersSeveral Meters DistanceDistance Many KilometersMany Kilometers
AngleAngle RotationalRotational NoneNone Pitch/YawPitch/Yaw Many DegreesMany Degrees
ShapeShape TruncationTruncation 1mm1mm ScaleScale 10%10% BlobBlob 3cm3cm22 or greater or greater
HolesHoles Single HoleSingle Hole 3cm3cm22
PinholesPinholes 3cm3cm22 total total
E II x , y ie ikz
zE I x, y e
iz
x x 2 y y 2 dxdy
E I x,y E0 1 M x, y
E II x , y E0eikz 1
i
ze
iz
x 2 y 2 M x,y e
iz
x 2 y 2 e i
2z
x x y y dxdy
Fresnel Propagation from External Occulter
• Parallel “C/MPI” code to (512 node Beowulf): - Model occulter - Fresnel propagate to telescope • Current grids 32768 x 32768• Don’t yet get theorectical limit• Aliasing from small structure ? - No aliasing from Fresnel ripples (low Fresnel #) - from small scale structure ?
Core radius a 6.25 m Inner (Solid) starshadePetal Length b 6.25 m Petal characteristic lengthPetal Taper n 6 Petal shape parameter# of Petals p 12 Number of petalsDiameter d 25 m to 1/e transmission ptDiameter D 30 m tip-to-tipDistance z 18,000 km distance to TelescopeWavelength 0.5 um
-20 -16 -12 -8 -4 0 4 8 12 16 20
1e-10
1e-08
1e-06
1e-04
1e-02
1e+00
Meters
Intensity at Telescope
45 meters
LOGO.049
R. Lyon09/29/06
100,000 km 50,000 km
25,000 km 18,000 km
Real part of field at mask
Copyright 2006 Northrop Grumman Corporation
Occulter Systems Terrestrial Planet Finding
Jon Arenberg
Amy Lo
Chuck Lillie
Richard Malmstrom
Ron Polidan
Copyright 2006 Northrop Grumman Corporation
Occulter Based TPF Missions are Viable
Occulter 101 Sufficient suppression of star light
at the same time as achieving small IWA
Sizing and spacing of the occulter
How does the occulter handle challenges to performance
What would a mission look like? How is occulter telescope
alignment established and maintained (Charley Noecker)
Experimental Results; Leviton and Cash (In Prep)
Copyright 2006 Northrop Grumman Corporation
The Basic NWO Architecture Occulters blocks on-axis star light Telescope looks at off-axis star light to observe
companion
planet
Target Star NWO OcculterTelescope
Copyright 2006 Northrop Grumman Corporation
The Occulter Parameters
Parameter Symbol Affects….
solid disk radius a IWA, stellar suppression
Gaussian radius parameter b IWA, stellar suppression
the petal shape parameter n Observation wavelength
Occulter separation F IWA, stellar suppression
number of petals P Minimum needed
Copyright 2006 Northrop Grumman Corporation
Two Effects of the Occulter
Image at aperture:Diffraction pattern produced by occulter, color indicates the achievable stellar suppression
Image at focal plane, the Occulter’s “PSF”, note that outside of the IWA, it’s dark!
star occulter telescope
LOG Scale
LOG Scale
R
Copyright 2006 Northrop Grumman Corporation
The Occulter PSF
Occulter acts as an optical element and focuses incident starlight to the entrance pupil
The intensity of the starlight is greatly decreased, and the phase is distorted by the destructive interference caused by the occulter petals
The telescope optics therefore produces a defocused residual stellar image at the focal plane, here called the stellar leakage
Inside a certain radius on the focal plane, defined as the IWA, the stellar leakage is bright, and can be thought of as the occulter’s “PSF”
IWA
These four points are artifacts of diffraction calculated with a square grid
LOG Scale
Copyright 2006 Northrop Grumman Corporation
The Occulter PSF
Incomplete destructive interference produces gradual roll off of the residual stellar leakage
The leakages decreases with radial distance from the occulter center, and is the chief source of the “background” signal OUTSIDE of the IWA
Planet light compete with this background signal
The correct figure of merit used to judge the NWO occulter is to measure the signal to noise of this background with incident, off-axis planet light
IWA
These four points are artifacts of diffraction calculated with a square grid
LOG Scale
Copyright 2006 Northrop Grumman Corporation
NWO Only Needs 10-8 Suppression
In order for the planet light to be above the background, the occulter only needs to achieve 10-8 stellar suppression between the star and the planet
We are in fact measuring the planet signals inside the wings of the stellar PSF, which gives us the extra factor of 100 reduction
10-10 Suppression 10-9 Suppression 10-8 Suppression
Linear Scale
Copyright 2006 Northrop Grumman Corporation
“Movie” of Planet moving Off-Axis Suppression at Suppression = 10-10
0 mas
LOG Scale Linear Scale
Copyright 2006 Northrop Grumman Corporation
“Movie” of Planet moving Off-Axis Suppression at Suppression = 10-10
50 mas
LOG Scale Linear Scale
Copyright 2006 Northrop Grumman Corporation
“Movie” of Planet moving Off-Axis Suppression at Suppression = 10-10
70 mas
LOG Scale Linear Scale
Copyright 2006 Northrop Grumman Corporation
“Movie” of Planet moving Off-Axis Suppression at Suppression = 10-10
75 mas
LOG Scale Linear Scale
Copyright 2006 Northrop Grumman Corporation
“Movie” of Planet moving Off-Axis Suppression at Suppression = 10-10
80 mas
LOG Scale Linear Scale
Copyright 2006 Northrop Grumman Corporation
“Movie” of Planet moving Off-Axis Suppression at Suppression = 10-10
85 mas
LOG Scale Linear Scale
Copyright 2006 Northrop Grumman Corporation
“Movie” of Planet moving Off-Axis Suppression at Suppression = 10-10
90 mas
LOG Scale Linear Scale
Copyright 2006 Northrop Grumman Corporation
“Movie” of Planet moving Off-Axis Suppression at Suppression = 10-10
100 mas
LOG Scale Linear Scale
Copyright 2006 Northrop Grumman Corporation
“Movie” of Planet moving Off-Axis Suppression at Suppression = 10-10
110 mas
LOG Scale Linear Scale
Copyright 2006 Northrop Grumman Corporation
Occulters Capable of 10-10 Suppression
Occulters that achieve the desired suppression
Occulters that do NOT achieve desired suppression
The following were generated using 1-D FrFT simulation
All numbers shown are real results, no approximations have been made
4 m telescope (on axis)
Maximum wavelength 800 nm
Order 6 occulter
Copyright 2006 Northrop Grumman Corporation
Occulters IWA Less Than 100 mas
Occulters with IWA smaller than 100 mas
Occulters with IWA larger than 100 mas
Copyright 2006 Northrop Grumman Corporation
Intersection Identifies Viable Parameter Space
There is a minimum size occulter for a given set of requirements
Different plot for hypergaussian order and maximum wavelength
This size does not account for known liens on performance
Smallest Possible Occulter, 28m
Occulters with both suppression better than 10-10
and IWA smaller than 100 mas
SPIE Astronomical and Instrumentation 2006, Orlando, FL
Paper 6265-67
Requirements Flow for Test Case• Contrast ratio of 10-10,
IWA of 100 mas• 4 m diffraction limited
telescope• Maximum =800 nm• Each source gets
O(10-11)
a, b, n, P, F, edge width, reflectance,Instrument
a, b, n, P
Operationalconstraint
a, b, n, P, F
a, b, n, P, F
Operationalconstraint
a, b, n, P, F
SPIE Astronomical and Instrumentation 2006, Orlando, FL
Paper 6265-67
Design Space Construction
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 6010
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100Occulter Log CR < -10, and IWA < 90 mas
Occulter Diameter [m]
Occ
ulte
r S
ep
ara
tion
[10
00
km
]
Occulter Too Far Away
Occu
lter To
o L
arge
•The allowed design space is continuous
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-2
100
102
104
106
108
wo [m]
Co
ntr
ast
LO
SS
4 cycles
8 cycles
12 cycles16 cycles
22 cycles
32 cycles
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
10-12
10-10
10-8
10-6
10-4
10-2
100
Telescope Plane Size [m]
Copyright 2006 Northrop Grumman Corporation
Occulter Systems are Flexible
An occulter can be located at any separation distance
Allows the system to mix and match suppression and IWA
Copyright 2006 Northrop Grumman Corporation
Full Scale Mission: 1 Telescope, 2 Occulters
4 meter VIS/UV ordinary space telescope Smaller telescope does allow the TPF-C science program to
be accomplished 50% planet hunting duty cycle, 50% general astrophysics
Survey occulter: quickly scan and discovery signatures of planets
IWA = 100 mas, Stellar suppression = 10-10 @ 800 nm Occulter size (theory) 28 m and separation 30 Mm
Big Occulter: aligns with target star and provides deep integration
IWA = 50 mas, Stellar suppression = 10-11 @ 800 nm Occulter size (theory) 50m and separation 80 Mm
Copyright 2006 Northrop Grumman Corporation
Sample Full-Mission Orbit and V
Lissajous orbit at Sun-Earth L2 point 1.2M km wide Launch to C3 = −.68 km²/s²
Telescope ∆V required: 70 m/s injection ~ 2 m/s/yr stationkeeping
Survey occulter Drift rate: 7.6 x 10-6 m/s2
1 m/s stationkeeping [1 day] 40 m/s slewing [25°, 6 days] Total V = 304*41 = 12.5 km/s
Big occulter Drift rate: 1.7 x 10-5 m/s2
7.5 m/s stationkeeping [5 days] 70 m/s slewing [25°, 12 days] Total V = 80*77.5 = 6.2 km/s
SEP is necessary for both the small and large occulters
The challenge
Target star, telescope, and star-shade must be collinear within1. About 60-100 mas for the onset of occultation2. About 4 mas (TBR) during the observation
During on-orbit checkout, allow alignment acquisition and calibration to take telescope time
During normal operations, try to minimize telescope participation in alignment acquisition
The Problem
Four steps:– (01) Find partner s/c on sky– (2) Acquire occultation on new target ( accuracy)– (23) Optimize alignment before observation ( calibration)– (3) Maintain alignment during observation ( stability)
1
Uncertainty in bearing (rad)
DSN Find partner Astrometry Occult’n
10-2 10-6 10-8 10-4
CC retro ground calib? Calibr
3210
Sensor options under consideration
Telescope
Antipode field stars
Brighttarget
star
Target star
Target star
Telescope & field stars
Retro
Retro
Occulter Telescope
Red leak of occulter illuminates aperture
edges; guide telescope to a minimum
TelescopeLaser or sunlight
Starlight
Acquisition
Target acquisition requires accuracy
Bearing vector (telescope starshade) aligned with line of sight (LOS) within – Arcsecond or more (close range) during initial checkout and calibration– 60-100 mas accuracy operationally
• Bonus points: minimize telescope participation, for minimum impact on observing schedule
Techniques– On starshade, observe light from telescope against antipode stars
• Hipparcos limit ~30-50 mas (antipode vs. nearby stars)– On starshade, observe light from telescope against retroreflected target star
(camera/telescope with cubecorner in front)• CC calibration pre-launch• On-orbit calibration after first acquisition
– On telescope, observe light from starshade against target star Light sources:
– Scattered sunlight from other spacecraft– Laser beacon
Optimize alignment before observation
Observe stellar occultation depth with telescope andsimultaneously watch the alignment sensor
Map out target star’s occultation depth vs. alignment offsets– Calibrate alignment sensor vs. peak occultation– Hold the peak for the duration of an observation– Maybe the detected image of diffracted starlight will help
This calibration, carried from star to star, reduces the setup time needed to reach deep occultation
Maintaining alignment during observation only requires stability
Nominal control tolerance ~4 mas (TBR)– 1 meter / 50,000km = 4 mas = 20 nrad– For a 2 µrad pixel 20 nrad = 1%
Stable for 4-16 hours (TBR) with few recalibrations
During science observation, sensing of diffractive leakage at longer wavelengths (out of band) can help maintain centering and calibration without interruption
Other spacecraft may be faint
If telescope has 1 m2 total of lambertian scattering surface in direct sunlight, this gives 14 mag apparent brightness seen from 50,000 km
Active source (laser) would need small divergence angle to keep optical power requirement low
Large surfaces (starshade’s near side) could be turned deliberately into sunlight to boost visibility during acquisition
Copyright 2006 Northrop Grumman Corporation
Occulters Are Viable for TPF A mission design is being developed based on external occulters
No special telescope needed with multiple occulters Occulter sizes and distances reasonable
Design space smooth System can be aligned Provide for flexible operations Can handle finite stellar size Are broadband
Upper wavelength is the design parameter No outer working angle
Engineering challenges to implementation exist, but technologies are of high TRL
External occulters need to be described by figures of merit that are different than other candidates
Current work continuing the rapid development of occulter based missions for exoplanetary science