+ All Categories
Home > Education > Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest

Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest

Date post: 18-May-2015
Category:
Upload: tcooper66
View: 689 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
52
Nitrogen fertilization impacts on C sequestration and substitution in Pacific Northwest Forests Rob Harrison, APES reader College of the Environment (July 1) University of Washington Seattle, WA
Transcript
Page 1: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest

Nitrogen fertilization impacts

on C sequestration and

substitution in Pacific

Northwest Forests

Rob Harrison, APES reader

College of the Environment (July 1)

University of Washington

Seattle, WA

Page 2: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 3: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 4: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 5: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest

Luna

Julia Butterfly (Hill)

Page 6: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 7: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 8: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 9: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 10: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 11: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 12: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 13: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 14: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 15: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

sn

ofa

ll (in

ch

es

)

year of winter starting

Snowfall at Mt Rainier, Paradise Ranger Station

inches at paradise

Page 16: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 17: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest

Atmospheric CO2

allo

cation

CO3

formation

H2CO3 leaching

understorymicrobe, root

exudates

adsorption,oxidation

DO

C

DOC leaching

CO2 from soil,

root respiration

CO3

dissolution

Soil

CO

2evolu

tion

Mechanisms for Impact on

Deep Soil

(a)∆ in photosynthate allocation, deep vs.

shallow rooting

(b)∆ in quality of litterfall = ∆’s rate of

decomposition and DOC quality

(c)∆ in T or moisture affects microbial

decomposition, production and “quality”

of DOC

(d)∆’s in respiration affect formation of

H2CO3, degassing of CO2, formation of

CO3 and leaching of of H2CO3

(e)DOC production in and moving into

deeper soil profile more likely to adsorb

rather than respire

(f)Removal of OM with harvest reduces

high-quality DOC leaching and “priming”

of soil OM decomposition

(a

)

(c)

(b

)

(d

)

(e

)

(a

) (f)

harvest

removals amendments

Page 18: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 19: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 20: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest

Objectives

1) Due to the recent incorporation of atmospheric CO2

into tree wood, substitution of wood for concrete

and/or steel in construction reduces CO2 in the

atmosphere.

2) When PNW forests are fertilized with N, any

increases in wood production can result in

additional CO2 in soil and biomass. The effect of N

fertilization on substitution hasn’t been considered.

3) Our objectives were to quantify this soil, forest and

substitution effects.

Page 21: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 22: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest

N

Page 23: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 24: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 25: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 26: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 27: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 28: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest

SILVICULTURE

WOOD Q UALITY

NUTRITION

MODELING

College of Forest Resources University of Washington Box 352100 Seattle Washington 98195-2100 206-543-5355 phone 206-685-3091 fax

Page 29: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 30: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 31: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest

c1 c2 c3 c4 c5 c6 c7 c8

For each log section/cookie:

V1 = 1/3 * L * ((A1+A2+(A1*A2)^0.5)

V * % bark * bark density = bark

biomass

V * % bolewood * density = bolewood

biomass

2 diam. each side

(mm)

4 bark thickness

(0.5mm)

6 cookie thickness (0.1

mm)

% bark present/absent

cookie 1

A1=pi*r1*r2 A2=pi*r1*r2

Method of biomass

determination

variable

top

diametersvariable

stump

heights

Page 32: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 33: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 34: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest

37.6 Mg C/ha average C increase

Page 35: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest

Potential tree C sequestration impacts of PNW fertilization

If all commercial forest land in PNW was fertilized

37.6 Mg C/ha increase over 40 y rotation

20,900,000 hectares manageable forest land in WA and OR

785,840,000 Mg C 40 y rotation

0.786 Gigaton C

0.020 Gigaton C/year

Currently only about 25,000 ha fertilized/y in PNW

37.6 Mg C/ha increase over 40 y rotation

1,200,000 hectares manageable forest land in WA and OR

45,120,000 Mg C 40 y rotation

0.045 Gigaton C

0.001 Gigaton C/year

Page 36: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest

Excess of 3.4 GtC

(8)

Page 37: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 38: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 39: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 40: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest

Forest floor

O

A

E

B

Horizons

25 cm

55 cm

85 cm

grid CD

ID

SD

Page 41: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest

As horizons were extracted and sieved with the 25mm

screen, the components were weighed in the field. This

is material from the Bw horizon of Alderwood (glacial)

Page 42: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest

Samples of <25 mm material were brought back to the lab

for texture, moisture, color & nutrient analyses. Above is

Mud Mt. soil (volcanic). Left to right – A to the lowest Bs

horizon. Once dug and bulk density (Db) measured, the

corer is used to bore holes in the pit sides for lysimeter

insertion. After lab samples are removed, all material from

each horizon is bagged (upper right) and then returned to

the pit at the original depth on filling.

Page 43: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest

8.0 Mg C/ha average C increase

Page 44: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest

Potential soil C sequestration impacts of PNW fertilization

If all commercial forest land in PNW was fertilized

8.0 Mg C/ha increase over 40 y rotation

20,900,000 hectares manageable forest land in WA and OR

167,200,000 Mg C 40 y rotation

0.167 Gigaton C

0.004 Gigaton C/year

Currently only about 25,000 ha fertilized/y in PNW

8.0 Mg C/ha increase over 40 y rotation

1,200,000 hectares manageable forest land in WA and OR

9,600,000 Mg C 40 y rotation

0.010 Gigaton C

0.0002 Gigaton C/year

Page 45: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest

Wilson et al., 2006

Page 46: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 47: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 48: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 49: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest

Conclusions1) Forest fertilization in the PNW yields increases in forest

productivity though though still a relatively small (0.56%)

impact on the Global C cycle.

2) Most PNW forest C is in soil, but soil increment response to

N is relatively small and long-term impacts unknown.

3) Over long periods of time, substitution of wood for concrete,

steel and other products will have the largest impact on

global CO2 for both unfertilized and fertilized forests. At age

150 y, production forests exceed unharvested forests in net

C impact. Old-growth forests do not sequester additional C.

4) In the long-term, it is absolutely essential that some forest

products be removed and used to displace other materials

that result in higher net CO2 to the atmosphere.

Page 50: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest

LEACHATE COLLECTIONS FROM 4

TENSION LYSIMETERS AT ONE PLOT

• O horizon darkest

• A horizon least

reliable

• B horizon color

varies

• C or deep B horizon

most predictable

(good yield and

colorless)

Page 51: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest
Page 52: Nitrogen Fertalizer Impacts on Carbon Sequestration and Substitution in the Pacific Northwest

Recommended