Noise Assessment - Blacktown City Council...The project proposes the construction of a new KFC...

Noise Assessment

Proposed KFC DevelopmentDP1067209, Lot 13, Windsor RoadKellyville Ridge, NSW.

Prepared for: Fishfood Holdings Pty LtdJune 2020MAC190808RP1V3

MAC190808RP1V3 Page | 2

Document Information

Noise Assessment

Proposed KFC Development

DP1067209, Lot 13, Windsor Road, Kellyville Ridge, NSW.

DOCUMENT ID STATUS DATE PREPARED BY SIGNED REVIEWED BY SIGNED

MAC190808RP1V3 Final 19 June 2020 Robin Heaton Oliver Muller

DISCLAIMERAll documents produced by Muller Acoustic Consulting Pty Ltd (MAC) are prepared for a particular client’s requirements and are based on a specific scope,

circumstances and limitations derived between MAC and the client. Information and/or report(s) prepared by MAC may not be suitable for uses other than the

original intended objective. No parties other than the client should use or reproduce any information and/or report(s) without obtaining permission from MAC.

Any information and/or documents prepared by MAC is not to be reproduced, presented or reviewed except in full.

Prepared for: Fishfood Holdings Pty Ltd39A Hull RoadBeecroft NSW 2119

Prepared by: Muller Acoustic Consulting Pty LtdPO Box 262, Newcastle NSW 2300ABN: 36 602 225 132P: +61 2 4920 1833www.mulleracoustic.com


CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................................................5

PROPOSAL..............................................................................................................................................................................5

2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................................................................7

GENERAL ................................................................................................................................................................................7

RECEIVER REVIEW .................................................................................................................................................................7

PROPOSED ACTIVITIES .........................................................................................................................................................9

3 NOISE POLICY AND GUIDELINES ................................................................................................................................................ 11

NOISE POLICY FOR INDUSTRY.......................................................................................................................................... 11

PROJECT NOISE TRIGGER LEVELS......................................................................................................................... 12

PROJECT INTRUSIVENESS NOISE LEVEL ............................................................................................................... 12

PROJECT AMENITY NOISE LEVEL ........................................................................................................................... 12

MAXIMUM NOISE LEVEL ASSESSMENT .................................................................................................................. 14

STATE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING POLICY (INFRASTRUCTURE 2007) ...................................................................... 15

INTERIM CONSTRUCTION NOISE GUIDELINE.................................................................................................................. 15

CONSTRUCTION NOISE MANAGEMENT LEVELS................................................................................................... 17

4 NOISE CRITERIA ............................................................................................................................................................................ 19

BACKGROUND NOISE ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................................................. 19

UNATTENDED NOISE MONITORING ....................................................................................................................... 19

OPERATIONAL NOISE CRITERIA........................................................................................................................................ 20

PROJECT INTRUSIVENESS NOISE LEVELS ............................................................................................................. 20

PROJECT AMENITY NOISE LEVELS ......................................................................................................................... 20

PROJECT NOISE TRIGGER LEVELS......................................................................................................................... 21

MAXIMUM NOISE LEVEL ASSESSMENT CRITERIA ........................................................................................................... 21

CONSTRUCTION NOISE MANAGEMENT LEVELS ............................................................................................................. 22

5 NOISE ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY........................................................................................................................................ 23

SOUND POWER LEVELS ..................................................................................................................................................... 23

NOISE ATTENUATION ASSUMPTIONS............................................................................................................................... 24

6 NOISE ASSESSMENT RESULTS .................................................................................................................................................... 25

OPERATIONAL NOISE RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................ 25


MAXIMUM NOISE LEVELS ASSESSMENT RESULTS ......................................................................................................... 26

CONSTRUCTION NOISE RESULTS..................................................................................................................................... 26

7 CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS...................................................................................................................................... 27

8 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................................ 29

APPENDIX A - GLOSSARY OF TERMS

APPENDIX B - SITE PLANS

APPENDIX C - NOISE LOGGING CHARTS


1 Introduction

Muller Acoustic Consulting Pty Ltd (MAC) has been commissioned by Bradshaw Property Group on

behalf of Fishfood Holdings Pty Ltd to prepare a Noise Assessment (NA) to quantify emissions from the

proposed KFC Operation (the ‘operation’) to be established at DP1067209, Lot 13, Windsor Road,

Kellyville Ridge, NSW.

The NA has quantified potential operational, sleep disturbance and construction noise emissions from

the operation and recommends reasonable and feasible noise controls where required.

The assessment has been undertaken in accordance with the following documents:

Environment Protection Authority (EPA), NSW Noise Policy for Industry (NPI) 2017;

Australian Standard AS 1055:2018 - Acoustics - Description and measurement of

environmental noise - General Procedures; and

International Standard ISO 9613:1993 - Acoustics - Attenuation of sound during propagation

outdoors.

A glossary of terms, definitions and abbreviations used in this report is provided in Appendix A.

Proposal

The project proposes the construction of a new KFC Operation at DP1067209, Lot 13, Windsor Road,

Kellyville Ridge, NSW. The project will consist of the KFC building, two drive-thru lanes, a walk up window

and four light vehicle parking bays. No internal or external dining areas are proposed as part of the

operation. The operation is proposed to operate 7am to 3am, seven days with consumable goods

deliveries proposed to occur between 5am to 7am, seven days. Appendix B provides the site layout

plans of the project.


This page has been intentionally left blank


2 Project Description

General

The operation is to be established at DP1067209, Lot 13 Windsor Road, Kellyville Ridge, NSW. The

surrounding noise catchment consists of residential receivers situated to the north, north-west, and west

of the project site. Several commercial receivers are located adjacent to the south of the project site,

with Windsor Road located to the east of the project site.

Receiver Review

A review of residential and commercial receivers in close proximity to the project has been completed

and are summarised in Table 1, along with their height relative to ground elevation. Figure 1 provides a

locality plan showing the position of these receivers in relation to the project.

Table 1 Receiver Locations

ReceiverCoordinates

(MGA56)Receiver Height Receiver Type

R1 307933 6269220 1.5/4/7/10/13m Residential

R2 307920 6269245 1.5/4/7/10/13m Residential

R3 307920 6269262 1.5/4/7/10/13m Residential

R4 307935 6269268 1.5/4/7/10/13m Residential

R5 307955 6269279 1.5/4/7/10m Residential

C1 307961 6269194 1.5m Commercial

C2 307946 6269247 1.5m Commercial

R1

WIN

DSO

R R

OA

DR2

R4

R5

C2

C1

R3

FIGURE 1 LOCALITY PLAN

REF: MAC190808

KEY

*Imagery Source : nearmaps

30m0

KEY

SITE LOCATION

RECEIVER LOCATIONR1

LOGGER LOCATIONL1

L1


Proposed Activities

There are several key activities associated with the project that have the potential to generate acoustic

impacts on nearby receivers.

Table 2 provides a summary of project noise sources and the assessment period in which they propose

to occur.

Table 2 Noise Generating Activities

Activity/Source Period1 Operational

Customer light vehicles

Day (7am to 6pm)

Evening (6pm to 10pm)

Night (10pm to 5am)

Morning Shoulder (5am to 7am) X

Customer Ordering Display

(COD)

Day (7am to 6pm)


Night (10pm to 5am)


Consumable Goods Deliveries

Day (7am to 6pm)


Night (10pm to 5am) X

Morning Shoulder (5am to 7am)

Mechanical Plant

Day (7am to 6pm)


Night (10pm to 5am)


Waste Collection

Day (7am to 6pm)


Night (10pm to 5am) X

Morning Shoulder (5am to 7am) Note 1: Morning Shoulder – the period from 5am to 7am Monday to Saturday or 5am to 8am on Sundays, Day - the period from 7am to 6pm Monday to Saturday or 8am to 6pm on

Sundays and public holidays; Evening - the period from 6pm to 10pm; Night - the remaining periods.




3 Noise Policy and Guidelines

Noise Policy for Industry

The EPA released the Noise Policy for Industry (NPI) in October 2017 which provides a process for

establishing noise criteria for consents and licenses enabling the EPA to regulate noise emissions from

scheduled premises under the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997. The objectives of the

NPI are to:

provide noise criteria that is used to assess the change in both short term and long term noise

levels;

provide a clear and consistent framework for assessing environmental noise impacts from

industrial premises and industrial development proposals;

promote the use of best-practice noise mitigation measures that are feasible and reasonable

where potential impacts have been identified; and

support a process to guide the determination of achievable noise limits for planning approvals

and/or licences, taking into account the matters that must be considered under the relevant

legislation (such as the economic and social benefits and impacts of industrial development).

The policy sets out a process for industrial noise management involving the following key steps:

1. Determine the Project Noise Trigger Levels (PNTLs) (ie criteria) for a development. These are the

levels (criteria), above which noise management measures are required to be considered. They are

derived by considering two factors: shorter-term intrusiveness due to changes in the noise

environment; and maintaining the noise amenity of an area.

2. Predict or measure the noise levels produced by the development with regard to the presence of

annoying noise characteristics and meteorological effects such as temperature inversions and wind.

3. Compare the predicted or measured noise level with the PNTL, assessing impacts and the need for

noise mitigation and management measures.

4. Consider residual noise impacts - that is, where noise levels exceed the PNTLs after the application

of feasible and reasonable noise mitigation measures. This may involve balancing economic, social

and environmental costs and benefits from the proposed development against the noise impacts,

including consultation with the affected community where impacts are expected to be significant.


5. Set statutory compliance levels that reflect the best achievable and agreed noise limits for the

development.

6. Monitor and report environmental noise levels from the development.

Project Noise Trigger Levels

The policy sets out the procedure to determine the PNTLs relevant to an industrial development. The

PNTL is the lower (ie, the more stringent) value of the Project Intrusiveness Noise Level (PINL) and Project

Amenity Noise Level (PANL) determined in accordance with Section 2.3 and Section 2.4 of the NPI.

Project Intrusiveness Noise Level

The PINL (LAeq,15min) is the RBL + 5dB and seeks to limit the degree of change a new noise source

introduces to an existing environment. Hence, when assessing intrusiveness, background noise levels

needs to be measured.

Project Amenity Noise Level

The PANL is relevant to a specific land use or locality. To limit continuing increases in intrusiveness

levels, the ambient noise level within an area from all combined industrial sources should remain below

the recommended amenity noise levels specified in Table 2.2 (of the NPI). The NPI defines two

categories of amenity noise levels:

Amenity Noise Levels (ANL) – are determined considering all current and future industrial noise

within a receiver area.

Project Amenity Noise Levels (PANL) – is the recommended levels for a receiver area,

specifically focusing the project being assessed.

Additionally, Section 2.4 of the NPI states: “to ensure that industrial noise levels (existing plus new)

remain within the recommended amenity noise levels for an area, a project amenity noise levels applies

for each new source of industrial noise as follows”:

Project amenity noise levels for industrial developments = recommended amenity noise levels minus

5dBA.


The following exceptions apply when deriving the PANL:

areas with high traffic noise levels;

proposed developments in major industrial clusters;

existing industrial noise and cumulative industrial noise effects; and

greenfield sites.

The NPI states with respect to high traffic noise areas:

The level of transport noise, road traffic noise in particular, may be high enough to make noise from an

industrial source effectively inaudible, even though the LAeq noise level from that industrial noise source

may exceed the project amenity noise level. In such cases the project amenity noise level may be derived

from the LAeq, period(traffic) minus 15 dB(A).

Where relevant this assessment has considered influences of traffic with respect to amenity noise levels

(ie areas where existing traffic noise levels are 10dB greater than the recommended amenity noise level).

The recommended amenity noise levels as per Table 2.2 of the NPI reproduced in Table 3.

Table 3 Amenity Criteria

Receiver TypeNoise Amenity

AreaTime of day

Recommended amenity noise level

dB LAeq

Residential Urban

Day 60

Evening 50

Night 45

Commercial premises All When in use 65

Notes: The recommended amenity noise levels refer only to noise from industrial noise sources. However, they refer to noise from all such sources at the receiver location, and not

only noise due to a specific project under consideration. The levels represent outdoor levels except where otherwise stated.

Types of receivers are defined as rural residential; suburban residential; urban residential; industrial interface; commercial; industrial – see Table 2.3 and Section 2.7.

Time of day is defined as follows: (These periods may be varied where appropriate, for example, see A3 in Fact Sheet A.)

• day – the period from 7am to 6pm Monday to Saturday or 8am to 6pm on Sundays and public holidays

• evening – the period from 6pm to 10pm

• night – the remaining periods.


Maximum Noise Level Assessment

The potential for sleep disturbance from maximum noise level events from a project during the night-

time period needs to be considered. The NPI considers sleep disturbance to be both awakenings and

disturbance to sleep stages.

Where night-time noise levels from a development/premises at a residential location exceed:

LAeq(15min) 40dBA or the prevailing RBL plus 5dB, whichever is the greater, and/or

LAmax 52dBA or the prevailing RBL plus 15dB, whichever is the greater,

a detailed maximum noise level event assessment should be undertaken.

A detailed assessment should cover the maximum noise level, the extent to which the maximum noise

level exceeds the rating background noise level, and the number of times this happens during the night-

time period.

Other factors that may be important in assessing the impacts on sleep disturbance include:

how often the events would occur;

the distribution of likely events across the night-time period and the existing ambient maximum

events in the absence of the development;

whether there are times of day when there is a clear change in the noise environment (such as

during early morning shoulder periods); and

current understanding of effects of maximum noise level events at night.


State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure 2007)

Part 3, Division 17, Subdivision 2, Clause 102 of the State Environmental Planning Policy (SEPP) is aimed

at managing the acoustic impact of road corridors, with an AADT of in excess of 40,000 vehicles on

surrounding receivers. The clause applies to the following developments:

residential accommodation;

a place of public worship;

a hospital; and

an educational establishment or centre-based childcare facility.

The SEPP is not relevant to this project as it is a commercial development.

Furthermore, the internal noise level for employees within the operation would be greater than road noise

intrusion into the operation.

Interim Construction Noise Guideline

The assessment and management of noise from construction work is completed with reference to the

Interim Construction Noise Guideline (ICNG). The ICNG is specifically aimed at managing noise from

construction work regulated by the EPA and is used to assist in setting statutory conditions in licences

or other regulatory instruments. The types of construction regulated by the EPA under the POEO Act

(1997), include construction, maintenance and renewal activities carried out by a public authority, such

as road upgrades as described in Schedule 1 of the POEO Act.

The ICNG sets out procedures to identify and address the impact of construction noise on residences

and other sensitive land uses. This section provides a summary of noise objectives that are applicable

to the assessment.

The ICNG provides two methodologies for the assessment of construction noise emissions:

Quantitative, which is suited to major construction projects with typical durations of more than

three weeks;

Qualitative, which is suited to short term infrastructure maintenance (for projects with a typical

duration of less than three weeks).


The methodology for a quantitative assessment requires a more complex approach, involving noise

emission predictions from construction activities to the nearest relevant receptors. The qualitative

assessment methodology is a more simplified approach that relies more on noise management

strategies. This study has adopted a quantitative assessment approach.

The quantitative approach includes identification of potentially affected receptors, description of

activities involved in the project, derivation of the construction noise management levels, quantification

of potential noise impact at receptors and, provides management and mitigation recommendations.

Table 4 summarises the ICNG recommended standard hours for construction.

Table 4 Recommended Standard Hours for Construction

Period Preferred Construction Hours

Day (Standard construction hours)

Monday to Friday - 7am to 6pm

Saturdays - 8am to 1pm

Sundays or Public Holidays - No construction

The recommended hours do not apply in the event of direction from police, or other relevant authorities,

for safety reasons or where required in an emergency to avoid the loss of lives, property and/or to prevent

environmental harm. Work conducted outside of standard hours are considered out of hours work (OOH).

OOH periods are divided into two categories representing evening and night periods and cover the

hours listed below:

Period 1 (evening/low risk period): Monday to Friday – 6pm to 10pm, Saturdays – 1pm to 6pm,

Sundays – 8am to 6pm.

Period 2 (night/medium to high risk period): Monday to Friday – 10pm to 7am,

Saturdays/Sundays – 6pm to 7am (8am on Sunday mornings).


Construction Noise Management Levels

Section 4 of the ICNG details the quantitative assessment method involving predicting noise levels and

comparing them with the Noise Management Level (NML), and are important indicators of the potential

level of construction noise impact. Table 5 provides the ICNG recommended LAeq(15min) NMLs and how

they are to be applied.

Table 5 Noise Management Levels

Time of DayManagement Level

LAeq(15min)1 How to Apply

Recommended standard

hours: Monday to Friday

7am to 6pm Saturday

8am to 1pm No work on

Sundays or public

holidays.

Noise affected

RBL + 10 dB.

The noise affected level represents the point above which there

may be some community reaction to noise.

Where the predicted or measured LAeq(15min) is greater than

the noise affected level, the proponent should apply all feasible

and reasonable work practices to meet the noise affected level.

The proponent should also inform all potentially impacted

residents of the nature of work to be carried out, the expected

noise levels and duration, as well as contact details.

Highly noise affected

75 dBA.

The highly noise affected level represents the point above

which there may be strong community reaction to noise.

Where noise is above this level, the relevant authority (consent,

determining or regulatory) may require respite periods by

restricting the hours that the very noisy activities can occur,

taking into account times identified by the community when

they are less sensitive to noise (such as before and after

school for work near schools, or mid-morning or mid-afternoon

for work near residences; and if the community is prepared to

accept a longer period of construction in exchange for

restrictions on construction times.

Outside recommended

standard hours.

Noise affected

RBL + 5 dB.

A strong justification would typically be required for work

outside the recommended standard hours.

The proponent should apply all feasible and reasonable work

practices to meet the noise affected level.

Where all feasible and reasonable practices have been applied

and noise is more than 5 dBA above the noise affected level,

the proponent should negotiate with the community.

For guidance on negotiating agreements see section 7.2.2.Note 1: The Rating Background Level (RBL) is an overall single figure background level representing each assessment period over the whole monitoring period. The RBL is used to determine

the construction noise management levels for noise assessment purposes and is the median of the ABL’s.




4 Noise Criteria

Background Noise Environment

Unattended Noise Monitoring

To quantify the existing background noise environment of the area, unattended noise monitoring was

conducted at the undeveloped project site, as shown in Figure 1 and is considered representative of

surrounding receivers as per Fact Sheet B1.1 of the NPI.

The unattended noise survey was conducted in general accordance with the procedures described in

Australian Standard AS 1055:2018, “Acoustics - Description and Measurement of Environmental Noise”.

The measurements were carried out using a Type 1, Svantek 977 noise analyser from Friday

2 August 2019 to Monday 12 August 2019. Observations on-site identified the surrounding locality was

typical of an urban environment, with commercial sources and traffic noise audible. Calibration of all

instrumentation was checked prior to and following measurements. Drift in calibration did not exceed

±0.5dBA. All equipment carried appropriate and current NATA (or manufacturer) calibration certificates.

Data affected by adverse meteorological conditions have been excluded from the results in accordance

with methodologies provided in Fact Sheet A4 of the NPI. Residential receptors situated in surrounding

area have been classified under the EPA’s urban amenity category. This criterion is used in conjunction

with the intrusiveness criteria to determine the limiting criteria. The results of long-term unattended noise

monitoring are provided in Table 6. The noise monitoring charts for the background logging assessment

are provided in Appendix C.

Table 6 Background Noise Monitoring Summary

Monitoring Location Period1 Measured Background Noise Level (LA90)

RBL, dBA

Measured

dB LAeq

L1

Day 57 70

Evening 56 69

Night 45 65

Morning Shoulder 51 69

Note: Excludes periods of wind or rain affected data. Meteorological data obtained from the Bureau of Meteorology weather station Horsley Park Equestrian Centre AWS 33.85°S 150.85°E

100m AMSL.

Note 1: Morning Shoulder – the period from 5am to 7am Monday to Saturday or 5am to 8am on Sundays, Day - the period from 7am to 6pm Monday to Saturday or 8am to 6pm on Sundays

and public holidays; Evening - the period from 6pm to 10pm; Night - the remaining periods.


Operational Noise Criteria

Project Intrusiveness Noise Levels

The Project Intrusiveness Noise Levels (PINLs) for the project are presented in Table 7 and have been

determined based on the RBL +5dBA.

Table 7 Project Intrusiveness Noise Levels

Receiver Period1 RBL

dB LA90

PINL

dB LAeq(15min)

R1-R5

Day 57 62

Evening 56 61

Night 45 50

Morning Shoulder 51 56

Note: As per Section 2.1 of the NPI, Intrusiveness Noise Levels only apply to residences.

Note 1: Morning Shoulder – the period from 5am to 7am Monday to Saturday or 5am to 8am on Sundays, Day - the period from 7am to 6pm Monday to Saturday or 8am to 6pm on


Project Amenity Noise Levels

The Project Amenity Noise Levels (PANLs) for residential receivers and other receiver types (ie non-

residential) potentially affected by the project are presented in Table 8.

Table 8 Amenity Noise Levels and Project Amenity Noise Levels

Receiver TypeNoise Amenity

Area

Assessment

Period1

Recommended ANL

dB LAeq(period)2

PANL

dB LAeq(period)

PANL

dB LAeq(15min)4

R1-R5 Urban

Day 60 553 58

Evening 50 543 57

Night 45 503 53

Morning Shoulder5 N/A N/A N/A

C1-C2 Commercial When in use 65 65 68



Note 2: Recommended amenity noise levels as per Table 2.2 of the NPI.

Note 3: LAeq,period (traffic) as per section 2.4.1 of the NPI (i.e. existing LAeq Traffic -15dB).

Note 4: Includes a +3dB adjustment to the amenity period level to convert to a fifteen-minute assessment period as per Section 2.2 of the NPI.

Note 5: In accordance with the NPI, shoulder periods are assessed on intrusiveness criteria only.


Project Noise Trigger Levels

The Project Noise Trigger Levels (PNTLs) are the lower of either the PINL or the PANL. Table 9 presents

the derivation of the PNTLs in accordance with the methodologies outlined in the NPI.

Table 9 Project Noise Trigger Levels

Receiver Period1 PINL

dB LAeq(15min)

PANL

dB LAeq(15min)

PNTL

dB LAeq(15min)

R1-R5

Day 62 58 58

Evening 61 57 57

Night 50 53 50

Morning Shoulder 56 N/A 56

C1-C2 When in use N/A 68 68



Maximum Noise Level Assessment Criteria

Table 10 provides the sleep disturbance criterion for the nearest residential receivers. The sleep

disturbance criterion has been derived based on the night and morning shoulder RBL.

Table 10 Maximum Noise Level Assessment Screening Criteria

Residential Receivers R1-R5 - Night

LAeq(15min) LAmax

40dB LAeq(15min) or RBL + 5dB 52dB LAmax or RBL + 15dB

Trigger 40 Trigger 52

RBL45 +5dB 50 RBL 45+15dB 60

Highest 50 Highest 60

Residential Receivers R1-R5 – Morning Shoulder

LAeq(15min) LAmax

40dB LAeq(15min) or RBL + 5dB 52dB LAmax or RBL + 15dB

Trigger 40 Trigger 52

RBL 51+5dB 56 RBL 51+15dB 66

Highest 56 Highest 66

Note: Monday to Saturday; Night 10pm to 7am. On Sundays and Public Holidays Night 10pm to 8am.

Note: NPI identifies that maximum of the two values is to be adopted which is shown in bold font.


Construction Noise Management Levels

The Construction Noise Management Levels (CNMLs), established in accordance with the ICNG for the

project are presented in Table 11.

Table 11 Construction Noise Management Levels

Receivers Period1 RBL

dB LA90

CNML

(RBL+10dB) dB LAeq(15min)

R1-R5 Day 57 67

C1-C2 Day N/A 70

Note 1: See Table 4 of this report for Recommended Standard Hours for construction.


5 Noise Assessment Methodology

DGMR (iNoise, Version 2019.1) noise modelling software was used to assess potential noise impacts

from the project. The model incorporated three-dimensional ground contours and buildings within the

project site and the surrounding locality. Plant and equipment were modelled at various locations and

heights, representative of realistic operating conditions for assessed scenarios. The model calculation

method used to predict noise levels was in accordance with ISO 9613-1 ‘Acoustics - Attenuation of sound

during propagation outdoors. Part 1: Calculation of the absorption of sound by the atmosphere’ and ISO

9613-2 ‘Acoustics - Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors. Part 2: General method of

calculation’.

Sound Power Levels

Table 12 presents the sound power level for each noise source modelled in this assessment. It is noted

that sound power levels were sourced from manufacturer’s specifications or from in-field measurements

at similar project sites. The sound power levels have been adjusted to account for duration over a

15-minute period.

Table 12 Acoustically Significant Sources - Sound Power Levels (re 10-12 Watts)

Item and number modelled

per 15 minutes

Individual Sound Power

Level, dB LAeq(15min)

Total source Sound Power

Level, dB LAeq(15min)

Source

Height1

Operation

Fan CGD404 (x1) 77 77 0.5m

AC Plant PKY620T-6Q1 (x1) 81 81 0.5m

Customer Ordering Displays (x2) 75 78 1.0m

Truck Deliveries/Garbage Collection (x1) 92 92 1.5m

Car idle, start up and drive off (x11) 73 83 0.5m

Sleep disturbance assessment (LAmax), Night time periods (10pm to 7am)

Customer Yelling 92 1.0m

Delivery Impact 102 1.0m

Construction Fleet

Combined Construction Fleet 108 1.5m

Note 1: Height above the relative ground or building below source.


Noise Attenuation Assumptions

The noise model incorporated the following controls and assumptions:

inclusion of acoustic green roof over the COD / loading bay area as per the site plans (see

Appendix B);

the COD’s are assumed to be set at the lowest volume setting; and

garbage collection is undertaken utilising a pantec sized garbage truck which has an

equivalent noise level to that of a delivery truck.


6 Noise Assessment Results

This assessment has quantified operational noise levels at the nearest receivers combining the

simultaneous occurrence of all the following sources:

customer car noise (driving around site / parking);

COD’s, customers, passbys and deliveries/collections; and

mechanical plant.

Operational Noise Results

Noise predictions from all sources have been quantified at surrounding residential receivers to the

project site and are presented in Table 13.

It is probable that several plant may operate simultaneously on occasion for a limited duration. To

account for this, modelling has adopted the LAeq(15min) contribution of sources which were derived from

in-field measurements of operation sources or activities. Noise levels from combined activities are

predicted to satisfy the relevant NPI criteria at all nearest receivers.

Table 13 Combined Noise Predictions – All Receivers

Residential Receivers

Rec

Predicted Noise Level dB LAeq(15min) PNTL dB LAeq(15min)

CompliantDay Evening Night

Morning

ShoulderDay Evening Night

Morning

Shoulder

R1 51 51 42 51 58 57 50 56

R2 55 55 48 54 58 57 50 56

R3 46 46 45 36 58 57 50 56

R4 50 50 39 49 58 57 50 56

R5 45 45 42 42 58 57 50 56

Other Receivers

Rec

NoPeriod

Predicted Noise Level

dB LAeq(15min)

PNTL

dB LAeq(15min)Compliant

C1 When in use 36 68

C2 When in use 62 68




Maximum Noise Levels Assessment Results

In assessing maximum noise events, typical LAmax noise levels from transient events were assessed to

the nearest residential receivers. For the maximum noise assessment, a sound power level of 92dBA for

customer yelling noise during the night period and 102dBA for delivery impact during the morning

shoulder period are adopted for this assessment.

Predicted noise levels from LAmax events for assessed receivers are presented in Table 14. Results

identify that the maximum noise events screening criterion will be satisfied for all assessed receivers.

Table 14 Maximum Noise Levels Assessment (Night)1

ReceiverPredicted Level, LAmax dBA Screening Criteria, LAmax dBA

CompliantNight Morning Shoulder Night Morning Shoulder

R1 44 57 60 66

R2 44 48 60 66

R3 <35 42 60 66

R4 36 57 60 66

R5 41 52 60 66



Construction Noise Results

Table 15 presents the results of modelled construction noise emissions. Predictions identify that

emissions from construction have the potential to be above the noise management levels for several

assessed receivers. Accordingly, recommendations to reduce the impact of construction noise

emissions on surrounding receivers, are provided in Section 7.

Table 15 Construction Noise Levels – All Receivers

Receiver Period1 Predicted Noise Level

dB LAeq(15min)

Management Level

dB LAeq(15min)Compliant

R1 Day 64 67

R2 Day 69 67 X

R3 Day 68 67 X

R4 Day 74 67 X

R5 Day 76 67 X

C1 Day 40 70

C2 Day 73 70 X

Note 1: See Table 4 for recommended standard hours for construction.


7 Construction Recommendations

The results of the noise assessment demonstrate that levels during standard construction hours have

the potential to be above the ICNG noise management levels at the nearest receivers to the project.

Accordingly, it is recommended that noise management and mitigation measures be adopted during

noise intensive construction activities to limit impact on surrounding receivers.

Recommendations for consideration during construction activities for this project may include:

implement boundary fences/retaining walls as early as possible to maximise their attenuation

benefits to surrounding receivers;

toolbox and induction of personnel prior to shift to discuss noise control measures that may

be implemented to reduce noise emissions to the community;

where possible use mobile screens or construction hording to act as barriers between

construction works and receivers;

all plant should be shut down when not in use. Plant to be parked/started at farthest point from

relevant assessment locations;

operating plant in a conservative manner (no over-revving);

selection of the quietest suitable machinery available for each activity;

avoidance of noisy plant/machinery working simultaneously where practicable;

minimisation of metallic impact noise;

all plant are to utilise a broadband reverse alarm in lieu of the traditional hi frequency type

reverse alarm; and

undertake letter box drops to notify receivers of potential works.




8 Discussion and Conclusion

Muller Acoustic Consulting Pty Ltd (MAC) has completed a Noise Assessment to quantify potential noise

impacts from the proposed KFC Operation to be established at DP1067209, Lot 13, Windsor Road,

Kellyville Ridge, NSW.

The assessment has quantified potential operational emissions pertaining to customer generated noise,

including light vehicles, truck deliveries and mechanical plant.

The results of the Noise Assessment demonstrate that emissions from the project would satisfy the

relevant PNTLs at all assessed receivers for all assessment periods once noise controls for the project

are implemented (see Section 5.2).

Furthermore, sleep disturbance is not anticipated, as emissions from impact noise are predicted to

remain below the EPA for maximum noise level screening criterion.

Modelled noise emissions from project construction activities identify that predicted noise emission

levels may be above the applicable construction management levels. Accordingly, noise management

measures are provided in this report to reduce potential impacts on surrounding receivers.

Based on the findings of the Noise Assessment, it is recommended Council approve the operation taking

into consideration the noise control and management strategies provided in this report.



MAC190808RP1V3

Appendix A - Glossary of Terms

MAC190808RP1V3

A number of technical terms have been used in this report and are explained in Table A1.

Table A1 Glossary of Terms

Term Description

1/3 Octave Single octave bands divided into three parts

Octave A division of the frequency range into bands, the upper frequency limit of each band being

twice the lower frequency limit.

ABL Assessment Background Level (ABL) is defined in the NPI as a single figure background level

for each assessment period (day, evening and night). It is the tenth percentile of the measured

LA90 statistical noise levels.

Ambient Noise The noise associated with a given environment. Typically a composite of sounds from many

sources located both near and far where no particular sound is dominant.

Extraneous

Noise

Noise resulting from activities that are not typical of the area. Atypical activities include sources

such as construction and holiday period traffic.

A Weighting A standard weighting of the audible frequencies designed to reflect the response of the human

ear to noise.

dBA Noise is measured in units called decibels (dB). There are several scales for describing noise,

the most common being the ‘A-weighted’ scale. This attempts to closely approximate the

frequency response of the human ear.

dB(Z), dB(L) Decibels Linear or decibels Z-weighted.

Hertz (Hz) The measure of frequency of sound wave oscillations per second - 1 oscillation per second

equals 1 hertz.

LA10 A noise level which is exceeded 10 % of the time. It is approximately equivalent to the average

of maximum noise levels.

LA90 Commonly referred to as the background noise, this is the level exceeded 90 % of the time.

LAeq The summation of noise over a selected period of time. It is the energy average noise from a

source, and is the equivalent continuous sound pressure level over a given period.

LAmax The maximum root mean squared (rms) sound pressure level received at the microphone

during a measuring interval.

RBL The Rating Background Level (RBL) is an overall single figure background level representing

each assessment period over the whole monitoring period. The RBL is used to determine the

intrusiveness criteria for noise assessment purposes and is the median of the ABL’s.

Sound power

level (LW)

This is a measure of the total power radiated by a source. The sound power of a source is a

fundamental location of the source and is independent of the surrounding environment. Or a

measure of the energy emitted from a source as sound and is given by :

= 10.log10 (W/Wo)

Where: W is the sound power in watts and Wo is the sound reference power at 10-12 watts.

MAC190808RP1V3

Table A2 provides a list of common noise sources and their typical sound level.

Table A2 Common Noise Sources and Their Typical Sound Pressure Levels (SPL), dBA

Source Typical Sound Level

Threshold of pain 140

Jet engine 130

Hydraulic hammer 120

Chainsaw 110

Industrial workshop 100

Lawn-mower (operator position) 90

Heavy traffic (footpath) 80

Elevated speech 70

Typical conversation 60

Ambient suburban environment 40

Ambient rural environment 30

Bedroom (night with windows closed) 20

Threshold of hearing 0

Figure A1 – Human Perception of Sound

MAC190808RP1V3


MAC190808RP1V3

Appendix B - Site Plans

<O@JK@E> 97CK<O*NFFCNFIK?J

I<J@;<EK7C

-0++-0++ -0++

I<J@;<EK7C

LG

N7

@K@E

>8

7P

-1

++

JK

7=

=9

7I

G7

IB

@E>

23++

0+

+

J+,7+,+

J+.7+,+

J+/7+,+

J+-7+,+

J+07+,+

J+17+,+

-0++

[X\

)

1-++

JK7== 97IG7IB

00++

JK7== 97IG7IB

00++

1 0 / . - ,

3,2+

>I<<E IFF=

..3/+ ,0-4+

34+0 0/,+

FI;?N7P' ?FIEJ8P EJN -+22K<C<G?FE<5 $+-% 4432 ,333)<D7@C5QS[X\6_Q[QYT_`)R][)Qb9]\_QS IQ[QYT_` $7@7% 5 E][X\QaTS 7_RWXaTRa U]_ ITVXà_QaX]\'E1-.2 M,3-4/ H/20, N-11+ K34- J./0-

9C@<EK

GIFA<9K

;I7N@E>

9?<9B<; 7GGIFM<;

;I7N@E> EF) I<M)

,4 (,+4 *

9FGPI@>?K I7D7B<IJ 7I9?@K<9KJ GKP CK;) 9FGP@E>'I<GIF;L9K@FE FI LJ< F= K?@J ;<J@>E FI ;I7N@E> @EN?FC< FI G7IK @J GIF?@8@K<; N@K?FLK K?< NI@KK<E9FEJ<EK F= I7D7B<IJ 7I9?@K<9KJ GKP CK;)

9FEKI79KFI J?FLC; M<I@=P 7CC ;@D<EJ@FEJ FE J@K< 8<=FI<9FDD<E9@E> NFIB) @= 7 ;@J9I<G7E9P @J =FLE; 8<KN<<E=@>LI<; ;@D<EJ@FEJ 7E; J97C<; ;@D<EJ@FEJ' @K J?7CC 8<

9?<9B<; N@K? K?< GI@E9@G7C 9FEJLCK7EK)

K?@J ;F9LD<EK @J EFK KF 8< LJ<; =FI 9FEJKIL9K@FE LEC<JJJ@>E<; 7E; @JJL<; =FI 9FEJKIL9K@FE

,+

*+,*-

+-+

/5+

45.

,G

D

B

B=9 B<CCPM@CC< I@;><

=@J?=FF; ?FC;@E>J

7++.

N@E;JFI I; " D<II@M@CC< I;' B<CCPM@CC<I@;><' EJN -,00

;7 @JJL<

J@K< GC7E GIFGFJ<;

=K

D? 9I

G7PGF@EK

G@9B LGGF@EK

G@9

BL

GN

@E;

FN

GPCFEJ@>E

C@E

<F

=>

I<

<E

IF

F=

FM

87P

C@E< F= >I<<EIFF= FM

I<

<E

IF

F=

FM

<I

JK7==<EKIP

7,(,5,++ * 7.(,5-++

8f ;QaT ;T`R_XâX]\ ITc

=K +0),-),4 ITcX`TS ^QaWdQf*\]aT` ?

=K +2)+,)-+ IT[]cTS I]ZZT_ `WbaaT_ S]]_& BX]`Y` " ITcX`TS KTea`

@

=K +3)+,)-+ ITcX`TS `XaT ZQf]ba A

=K ,+)+,)-+ JdTâ ^QaW S_QdX\V`_TcX`TS*QSSTS

B

J@K

<8

FL

E;

7I

P

E < N 8 F L E ; 7 I P N 7 C C $?<@>?K5/)+[%

#B=9#8L@C;@E>

I<=<I KF ,4(,+4( 7,++ =FIGIFGFJ<; =CFFI GC7E

9<

EK

I<

C@E

<;

I@M

<K

?I

LN

@E;

FN

9<

EK

I<

C@E

<;

I@M

<K

?I

LN

@E;

FN

9<

EK

I<

C@E

<;

I@M

<K

?I

LN

@E;

FN

G@9B LGGF@EK

IF

F=

<;

><

J @ K < 8 F L E ; 7 I P

C@E

<J

F=

7N

E@E

>#`

FM

* I7DGJ*B<I8 " 9?7EE<C

><E<I7C B<P5

N?@K< #JPD8FC F= 799<JJ# 4++ ?@>? FE8CL< I<9K7E>C< ,-++JH) KF 9FDGCPN@K? 7J,/-3),

;I@M< K?IL JPJK<D ;<K<9K@FE CFFG

N?<<C JKFGJ

8@E LE@K

=FI J@>E KPG< J++) I<=7+,+ =FI J@>E ;<K7@CJ)

I8

EFK< 5 9FEJKIL9K@FE

9)+, =FI 8L@C;@E> ;@D<EJ@FEJ I<=E7>< J?FNE @J @EK<IE7CCP @CCLD@E7K<;LEF)9)+. 9FE=@ID <O79K J@K< ;@D<EJ@FEJ GI@FI KF9FDD<E9@E> 9FEJKIL9K@FE)

9)+/ D< 7CC 9LIM<; J<9K@FEJ F= IF7; @EKFJKI7@>?K J<9K@FEJ)

9)+0 B<I8 I7DGJ J?FNE KF 8< 7K 7 D7O@DLD>I7;@<EK F= , @E 3 7E; J?7CC =LCCP 9FDGCP N@K?

K?< I<HL@I<D<EKJ F= 7LJKI7C@7E JK7E;7I;7J,/-3),)

8FC

8FC

8FC

E<N 8FLE;7IP N7CC

CFK ELD8<

<O@JK@E> C7E;J97G<; 7I<7

EFK< FE GC7EJ 5

K?<J< NFIBJ 7I< EFK G7IK F= K?@J7GGC@97K@FE' 8LK N@CC 8< 9FEJKIL9K<; 7JG7IK F= 7GGIFM7C ;7 ,.(,+2+

LLE ,

N+L H? HI>GBG@ .2,,

K>M9BGBG@ P9EE 0,,,

N+L H? KHH? 22,,

N+L H? 9PGBG@ /2,,

MHI H? KHH? KE 3.,,

2 1 0 / . -

F-L,09,-,

;; ;E M P ;E

;E

P

;;

M

K>M9BGBG@ P9EE;>RHG=

@K>>G KHH? HO>K@K>>G KHH? HO>K

9PGBG@ HO>K

=*,5 =*,.

IB<D)NIPBG=HP

F><A9GB<9E >QA9NLMLRLM>F EHNOK>

IHP=>K<H9M>=?K9F>= K>= F>LA

>QHM>< P9EE <E9==BG@PBMA >QIK>LL>= CHBGMLHK LBFBE9K 9IIKHO>=

>QHM>< P9EE <E9==BG@PBMA >QIK>LL>= CHBGMLHK LBFBE9K 9IIKHO>=

BEENFBG9M>=IHER<9K;HG9M> LMKBI>L

I>=>LMKB9G?>G<BG@F.

LLE ,

N+L H? HI>GBG@ .2,,

K>M9BGBG@ P9EE 0,,,

N+L H? KHH? 22,,

N+L H? 9PGBG@ /2,,

MHI H? KHH? KE 3.,,

2 1 0 / . -

=NENQ $9E9;9LM>K$ %PABM>& D?<%9-,-2&*

=NENQ $;E9<D <9OB9K %LG0 A5 ) L_0&

<>FBGM>E ?< LRLM>F M>KKBMHKR<HEHNK6 $PHH=E9G=L M>9D$*LBS>6/,/,E g 011A g -2<>F>GM>E HI>G HNMLB=> <HKG>K MKBF9GMB @K9??BMB I9BGM K>JNBK>=

<HEHNK D>R6

P

;E

M

;;;E9<D ;KB<D MBE>L ?KHF ;>MM>KMBE>L( <H=> ;Q9.,,I( ?BGBLA #<HEHNK M;<( =BK><M ?BQ MH I<I9G>EL*

L<K>= F>LA6 /^^ MAB<D I>K?HK9M>=

F>M9EI9MM>KG6 K,//0-

=B9* /*.1^^( 0*34^^<>GMK>L( 0-" HI>G 9K>9

F9M>KB9E6 FBE= LM>>E?BGBLA6 IHP=>K<H9M<HEHNK6 D?< K>=

GHM>6 GHG ING<A>= I>KBF>M>K ;HK=>KMH F>LA 1,^^ PB=>

F. ;E9<D F>LA6 /^^ MAB<D I>K?HK9M>=F>M9E

I9MM>KG6 K,//0-=B9* /*.1^^( 0*34^^<>GMK>L( 0-" HI>G 9K>9

F9M>KB9E6 FBE= LM>>E?BGBLA6 IHP=>K<H9M<HEHNK6 D?< ;E9<D

L<9E>=K9PG

IKBG<BI9E <HGLNEM9GML =>M9BEL

K9F9D>KL 9K<ABM><ML IMR EM= 9;G .3 ,,. -23 0-5LNBM> /( -,3)--1 I9<B?B< AB@AP9R( AHKGL;R GLP .,33M>E>IAHG>6 %,.& 5543 -444*>F9BE6TV^[_8bT^T\Wbc*U`^*Te<`_bTV KT^T\Wbc %9B9& 6 G`^[_TdWV 9bUZ[dWUd X`b KWY[cdbTd[`_(G2./3 O-4.50 J031- P.22, M45. L/01.

<EB>GM

IKHC><M

=K9PBG@

<A><D>= 9IIKHO>=

=K9PBG@ GH* K>O*

-5 )-,5 +

<HIRKB@AM K9F9D>KL 9K<ABM><ML IMR EM=* <HIRBG@(K>IKH=N<MBHG HK NL> H? MABL =>LB@G HK =K9PBG@ BGPAHE> HK I9KM BL IKHAB;BM>= PBMAHNM MA> PKBMM>G<HGL>GM H? K9F9D>KL 9K<ABM><ML IMR EM=*

<HGMK9<MHK LAHNE= O>KB?R 9EE =BF>GLBHGL HG LBM> ;>?HK><HFF>G<BG@ PHKD* B? 9 =BL<K>I9G<R BL ?HNG= ;>MP>>G?B@NK>= =BF>GLBHGL 9G= L<9E>= =BF>GLBHGL( BM LA9EE ;>

<A><D>= PBMA MA> IKBG<BI9E <HGLNEM9GM*

MABL =H<NF>GM BL GHM MH ;> NL>= ?HK <HGLMKN<MBHG NGE>LLLB@G>= 9G= BLLN>= ?HK <HGLMKN<MBHG

4+,

-+.

,.

,.61

.6.

,I

F

@

D?< D>EEROBEE> KB=@>

?BLA?HH= AHE=BG@L

9.,,

PBG=LHK K= # F>KKBOBEE> K=( D>EEROBEE>KB=@>( GLP .-11

=9 BLLN>

>E>O9MBHGL ) LA>>M ,-

?M

@F <K

9L LAHPG

;h =TdW =WcUb[ad[`_ KWf

?M .0*,2*-5 IbW)=9 BcceW <

?M .2*,2*-5 IbW)=9 KWf[c[`_c =

?M ,/*-.*-5 =9 BcceW X`b U][W_d Taab`fT] >

?M ,1*-.*-5 =9 BcceW X`b U][W_dTaab`fT]6KWf[c[`_c)-

?

?M ,3*,-*., KW^`fWV K`]]Wb cZeddWb V``b' D[`c\c # KWf[cWV MWgdc

@

LHNMA >E>O9MBHGL<9E> ) -6-,, 8 9-7 -6.,, 89/

99-,,

LHNMA >E>O9MBHG ) =>M9BE>=

L<9E> ) -61, 8 9-7 -6-,, 89/

99-,,

GHM> 6

MA> ;NBE=>K LA9EE NMBEBS> P9EE <E9==BG@ >M<9L GHFBG9M>= HG MA> >E>O9MBHGL* F9M>KB9EGHM>L HG MA> =>M9BEL NMBEBS> @>G>KB< M>KFL?HK >9L> H? FH=B?B<9MBHG* <9IIBG@L HG P9EELMH ;> ?BGBLA>=+<HEHNK MH F9M<A P9EE ;>EHP*

D>R 6 @>G>K9E

A>B@AM BG FBEEBF>MK>L BG K>E9MBHG MH=9MNF E>O>E ,*,, ) LE9; E>O>E H? =BGBG@KHHF

,*,,

<MDMP $8D898KL=J$ %O@AL=& C>;%8,+,1&)

<MDMP $9D8;C ;8NA8J %KF/ @4 ( K^/&

;=EAFL=D >; KQKL=E L=JJALGJQ;GDGMJ5 $OGG<D8F<K L=8C$)KAR=5.+.+D f /00@ f ,1;=E=FL=D GH=F GMLKA<= ;GJF=J LJAE8FLA ?J8>>ALA H8AFL J=IMAJ=<

;GDGMJ C=Q5

O

9D

L

999D8;C 9JA;C LAD=K >JGE 9=LL=JLAD=K' ;G<= 9P8-++H' >AFAK@ #;GDGMJ L9;' <AJ=;L >AP LG H;H8F=DK)

E,J=< E=K@5 .]] L@A;C H=J>GJ8L=<

E=L8DH8LL=JF5 J+../,

<A8) .)-0]]' /)23]];=FLJ=K' /," GH=F 8J=8

E8L=JA8D5 EAD< KL==D>AFAK@5 HGO<=J;G8L;GDGMJ5 C>; J=<

FGL=5 FGF HMF;@=< H=JAE=L=J 9GJ<=JLG E=K@ 0+]] OA<=

E-9D8;C E=K@5 .]] L@A;C H=J>GJ8L=<

E=L8DH8LL=JF5 J+../,

<A8) .)-0]]' /)23]];=FLJ=K' /," GH=F 8J=8

E8L=JA8D5 EAD< KL==D>AFAK@5 HGO<=J;G8L;GDGMJ5 C>; 9D8;C

KKD +

M*K G> GH=FAF? -1++

J=L8AFAF? O8DD /+++

M*K G> JGG> 11++

M*K G> 8OFAF? .1++

LGH G> JGG> JD 2-++

10/.-,

KKD +

M*K G> GH=FAF? -1++

J=L8AFAF? O8DD /+++

M*K G> JGG> 11++

M*K G> 8OFAF? .1++

LGH G> JGG> JD 2-++

0/.-,O 9D

99 L LK+08+,+

K+18+,+

?J==F JGG> GN=J8OFAF? GN=J

HA;C(MH OAF<GO HA;C(MH OAF<GO H8Q OAF<GO

O)+- O)+. O)+/ O)+0

GJ<=J HGAFLK

?J==F JGG> GN=J

=PGL=; O8DD ;D8<<AF?OAL@ =PHJ=KK=< BGAFLKGJ KAEAD8J 8HHJGN=<

K;8D=<J8OF

HJAF;AH8D ;GFKMDL8FLK <=L8ADK

J8E8C=JK 8J;@AL=;LK HLQ DL< 89F -2 ++- ,12 /,4KMAL= .' ,+2(,,0 H8;A>A; @A?@O8Q' @GJFK9Q FKO -+22L=D=H@GF=5 %+-& 4432 ,333)=E8AD5SU]Z^7aS]S[Vab)T_])Sd;_âSU JS]S[Vab %8A8& 5 F_]Z^ScVU 8aTYZcVTc W_a JVXZbcaScZ_^'F1-.2 N,3-4/ I/20, O-11+ L34- K./0-

;DA=FL

HJGB=;L

<J8OAF?

;@=;C=< 8HHJGN=<

<J8OAF? FG) J=N)

,4 (,+4 *

;GHQJA?@L J8E8C=JK 8J;@AL=;LK HLQ DL<) ;GHQAF?'J=HJG<M;LAGF GJ MK= G> L@AK <=KA?F GJ <J8OAF? AFO@GD= GJ H8JL AK HJG@A9AL=< OAL@GML L@= OJALL=F;GFK=FL G> J8E8C=JK 8J;@AL=;LK HLQ DL<)

;GFLJ8;LGJ K@GMD< N=JA>Q 8DD <AE=FKAGFK GF KAL= 9=>GJ=;GEE=F;AF? OGJC) A> 8 <AK;J=H8F;Q AK >GMF< 9=LO==F>A?MJ=< <AE=FKAGFK 8F< K;8D=< <AE=FKAGFK' AL K@8DD 9=

;@=;C=< OAL@ L@= HJAF;AH8D ;GFKMDL8FL)

L@AK <G;ME=FL AK FGL LG 9= MK=< >GJ ;GFKLJM;LAGF MFD=KKKA?F=< 8F< AKKM=< >GJ ;GFKLJM;LAGF

3*+

,*-

+-

+-50

-5/

4H

E

9

C>; C=DDQNADD= JA<?=

>AK@>GG< @GD<AF?K

8-+,

OAF<KGJ J< # E=JJANADD= J<' C=DDQNADD=JA<?=' FKO -,00

<8 AKKM=

=D=N8LAGFK ( K@==L +-

>L

?E ;J

9g <ScV <VbTaZ`cZ_^ JVe

>L +.),-),4 <8 AbbdV W_a T\ZV^c S`à_eS\ 8

>L +0),-),4 <8 AbbdV W_a T\ZV^cS`à_eS\5JVeZbZ_^b(,

9

FGL= 5

L@= 9MAD<=J K@8DD MLADAR= O8DD ;D8<<AF? =L;8K FGEAF8L=< GF L@= =D=N8LAGFK) E8L=JA8DFGL=K GF L@= <=L8ADK MLADAR= ?=F=JA; L=JEK>GJ =8K= G> EG<A>A;8LAGF) ;8HHAF?K GF O8DDKLG 9= >AFAK@=<*;GDGMJ LG E8L;@ O8DD 9=DGO)

<JAN= L@JM =D=N8LAGF

K;8D= ( ,5,++ 7 8,6 ,5-++ 78.

98,++

<JAN= L@JM =D=N8LAGF ( <=L8AD=<K;8D= ( ,50+ 7 8,6 ,5,++ 78.

98,++

8K K@GOF

C=Q 5 ?=F=J8D

@=A?@L AF EADDAE=LJ=K AF J=D8LAGF LG<8LME D=N=D +)++ ( KD89 D=N=D G> <AFAF?JGGE

+)++

=NENQ $9E9;9LM>K$ %PABM>& D?<%9-,-2&*

=NENQ $;E9<D <9OB9K %LG0 A5 ) L_0&

<>FBGM>E ?< LRLM>F M>KKBMHKR<HEHNK6 $PHH=E9G=L M>9D$*LBS>6/,/,E g 011A g -2<>F>GM>E HI>G HNMLB=> <HKG>K MKBF9GMB @K9??BMB I9BGM K>JNBK>=

<HEHNK D>R6

P

;E

M

;;;E9<D ;KB<D MBE>L ?KHF ;>MM>KMBE>L( <H=> ;Q9.,,I( ?BGBLA #<HEHNK M;<( =BK><M ?BQ MH I<I9G>EL*

L<K>= F>LA6 /^^ MAB<D I>K?HK9M>=

F>M9EI9MM>KG6 K,//0-

=B9* /*.1^^( 0*34^^<>GMK>L( 0-" HI>G 9K>9

F9M>KB9E6 FBE= LM>>E?BGBLA6 IHP=>K<H9M<HEHNK6 D?< K>=

GHM>6 GHG ING<A>= I>KBF>M>K ;HK=>KMH F>LA 1,^^ PB=>

F. ;E9<D F>LA6 /^^ MAB<D I>K?HK9M>=F>M9E

I9MM>KG6 K,//0-=B9* /*.1^^( 0*34^^<>GMK>L( 0-" HI>G 9K>9

F9M>KB9E6 FBE= LM>>E?BGBLA6 IHP=>K<H9M<HEHNK6 D?< ;E9<D

LLE ,

N+L H? HI>GBG@ .2,,

K>M9BGBG@ P9EE 0,,,

N+L H? KHH? 22,,

N+L H? 9PGBG@ /2,,

MHI H? KHH? KE 3.,,

9;<=>

P*,-

=KBO> MAKN E9G>

9PGBG@ HO>K

K>

M9

BGBG

@P

9EE

=K

BO>

MA

KN

PBG

=H

P

;HE

9PGBG@ HO>K

IB<D)NI PBG=HP

?H

HM

I9

MA

PL,/9,-, ;E;E

L,09,-,

M

P

F-

;;

;E

L,39,-,

F><A9GB<9E >QA9NLMLRLM>F EHNOK>L

I>=>LMKB9G ?>G<>F.

I>K?HK9M>=F>LA

P

LLE ,

N+L H? HI>GBG@ .2,,

K>M9BGBG@ P9EE 0,,,

N+L H? KHH? 22,,

N+L H? 9PGBG@ /2,,

MHI H? KHH? KE 3.,,

9 ; < = >

=KBO> MAKN E9G>

=K

BO>

MA

KN

PBG

=H

P

P*,1

HK=>K IHBGM HK=>K IHBGM

=KBO> MAKN E9G> =KBO>P9R

;HE;HE;HE

=*-,

?HHMI9MA

L,29,-,

;E

L,19,-,

L,29,-,

L,19,-,

P

M

K>

M9

BGBG

@P

9E

E

F><A9GB<9E >QA9NLMLRLM>F EHNOK>L

L<9E>=K9PG

IKBG<BI9E <HGLNEM9GML =>M9BEL

K9F9D>KL 9K<ABM><ML IMR EM= 9;G .3 ,,. -23 0-5LNBM> /( -,3)--1 I9<B?B< AB@AP9R( AHKGL;R GLP .,33M>E>IAHG>6 %,.& 5543 -444*>F9BE6TV^[_8bT^T\Wbc*U`^*Te<`_bTV KT^T\Wbc %9B9& 6 G`^[_TdWV 9bUZ[dWUd X`b KWY[cdbTd[`_(G2./3 O-4.50 J031- P.22, M45. L/01.

<EB>GM

IKHC><M

=K9PBG@

<A><D>= 9IIKHO>=

=K9PBG@ GH* K>O*

-5 )-,5 +

<HIRKB@AM K9F9D>KL 9K<ABM><ML IMR EM=* <HIRBG@(K>IKH=N<MBHG HK NL> H? MABL =>LB@G HK =K9PBG@ BGPAHE> HK I9KM BL IKHAB;BM>= PBMAHNM MA> PKBMM>G<HGL>GM H? K9F9D>KL 9K<ABM><ML IMR EM=*

<HGMK9<MHK LAHNE= O>KB?R 9EE =BF>GLBHGL HG LBM> ;>?HK><HFF>G<BG@ PHKD* B? 9 =BL<K>I9G<R BL ?HNG= ;>MP>>G?B@NK>= =BF>GLBHGL 9G= L<9E>= =BF>GLBHGL( BM LA9EE ;>

<A><D>= PBMA MA> IKBG<BI9E <HGLNEM9GM*

MABL =H<NF>GM BL GHM MH ;> NL>= ?HK <HGLMKN<MBHG NGE>LLLB@G>= 9G= BLLN>= ?HK <HGLMKN<MBHG

4+,

-+.

,.

,.61

/6.

1I

F

=

D?< D>EEROBEE> KB=@>

?BLA?HH= AHE=BG@L

9.,.

PBG=LHK K= # F>KKBOBEE> K=( D>EEROBEE>KB=@>( GLP .-11

=9 BLLN>

>E>O9MBHGL ) LA>>M ,/

?M

@F <K

;h =TdW =WcUb[ad[`_ KWf

?M ,/*-.*-5 =9 BcceW X`b U][W_d Taab`fT] 9

?M ,1*-.*-5 =9 BcceW X`b U][W_dTaab`fT]6KWf[c[`_c)-

;

?M ,3*,-*., KW^`fWV K`]]Wb cZeddWb V``b' D[`c\c # KWf[cWV MWgdc

<

?M ,4*,-*., KWf[cWV c[dW ]Thèd =

GHM> 6

MA> ;NBE=>K LA9EE NMBEBS> P9EE <E9==BG@ >M<9L GHFBG9M>= HG MA> >E>O9MBHGL* F9M>KB9EGHM>L HG MA> =>M9BEL NMBEBS> @>G>KB< M>KFL?HK >9L> H? FH=B?B<9MBHG* <9IIBG@L HG P9EELMH ;> ?BGBLA>=+<HEHNK MH F9M<A P9EE ;>EHP*

?KHGM >E>O9MBHG ) =>M9BE>=

L<9E> ) -61, 8 9-7 -6-,, 89/

<9-,,

K>9K >E>O9MBHG ) =>M9BE>=

L<9E> ) -61, 8 9-7 -6-,, 89/

=9-,,

9L LAHPG

D>R 6 @>G>K9E

A>B@AM BG FBEEBF>MK>L BG K>E9MBHG MH=9MNF E>O>E ,*,, ) LE9; E>O>E H? =BGBG@KHHF

,*,,

KKD +

M*K G> GH=FAF? -1++

J=L8AFAF? O8DD /+++

M*K G> JGG> 11++

M*K G> 8OFAF? .1++

LGH G> JGG> JD 2-++

8 9 ; < =

<JAN= L@JM D8F=

J=

L8

AFAF

?*9

GM

F<

8J

QO

8DD

;D &-1++ ;D &-1++ ;D &-1++

>J==R=JJGGE

O8

K@

MH

8J

=8;GGCDAF= <JAFCK

;GGDJGGE

>GGLH8L@

<)+/

E=;@8FA;8D =P@8MKLKQKL=E DGMNJ=K

KKD +

M*K G> GH=FAF? -1++

J=L8AFAF? O8DD /+++

M*K G> JGG> 11++

M*K G> 8OFAF? .1++

LGH G> JGG> JD 2-++

/ . - ,

?J==F JGG> GN=J

JGG> KLJM;LMJ= 9Q KLJM;LMJ8D =F?AF==J#K <=L8AD

9J=8<AF? 8J=8 ;GGCDAF= <JAN= L@JMHA;C(MHOAF<GO

<JAN= L@JMHA;C(MHOAF<GO

<JAN= L@JMH8Q OAF<GO

;D -1++ ;D -1++ ;D -1++

8OFAF? GN=J

8OFAF? GN=J

O)+0 O)+/ O)+. O)+-

K;8D=<J8OF

HJAF;AH8D ;GFKMDL8FLK <=L8ADK

J8E8C=JK 8J;@AL=;LK HLQ DL< 89F -2 ++- ,12 /,4KMAL= .' ,+2(,,0 H8;A>A; @A?@O8Q' @GJFK9Q FKO -+22L=D=H@GF=5 $+-% 4432 ,333)=E8AD5SU]Z^7aS]S[Vab)T_])Sd;_âSU JS]S[Vab $8A8% 5 F_]Z^ScVU 8aTYZcVTc W_a JVXZbcaScZ_^'F1-.2 N,3-4/ I/20, O-11+ L34- K./0-

;DA=FL

HJGB=;L

<J8OAF?

;@=;C=< 8HHJGN=<

<J8OAF? FG) J=N)

,4 (,+4 *

;GHQJA?@L J8E8C=JK 8J;@AL=;LK HLQ DL<) ;GHQAF?'J=HJG<M;LAGF GJ MK= G> L@AK <=KA?F GJ <J8OAF? AFO@GD= GJ H8JL AK HJG@A9AL=< OAL@GML L@= OJALL=F;GFK=FL G> J8E8C=JK 8J;@AL=;LK HLQ DL<)

;GFLJ8;LGJ K@GMD< N=JA>Q 8DD <AE=FKAGFK GF KAL= 9=>GJ=;GEE=F;AF? OGJC) A> 8 <AK;J=H8F;Q AK >GMF< 9=LO==F>A?MJ=< <AE=FKAGFK 8F< K;8D=< <AE=FKAGFK' AL K@8DD 9=

;@=;C=< OAL@ L@= HJAF;AH8D ;GFKMDL8FL)

L@AK <G;ME=FL AK FGL LG 9= MK=< >GJ ;GFKLJM;LAGF MFD=KKKA?F=< 8F< AKKM=< >GJ ;GFKLJM;LAGF

3*+

,*-

+-

+-50

.5/

+H

E

<

C>; C=DDQNADD= JA<?=

>AK@>GG< @GD<AF?K

8.++

OAF<KGJ J< " E=JJANADD= J<' C=DDQNADD=JA<?=' FKO -,00

<8 AKKM=

K=;LAGFK ( K@==L +,

>L

?E ;J

9g <ScV <VbTaZ`cZ_^ JVe

>L +.),-),4 <8 AbbdV W_a T\ZV^c S`à_eS\ 8

>L +0),-),4 <8 AbbdV W_a T\ZV^cS`à_eS\5JVeZbZ_^b(,

9

>L +2)+,)-+ JV]_eVU J_\\Va bYdccVa U__a& CZ_b[b " JVeZbVU LVfcb

;

>L +3)+,)-+ JVeZbVU bZcV \Sg_dc <

8K K@GOF

K=;LAGF ( 8

K;8D= ( ,50+ 7 8,6 ,5,++ 78.

88,++

K=;LAGF ( 9

K;8D= ( ,50+ 7 8,6 ,5,++ 78.

98,++

C=Q 5 ?=F=J8D

@=A?@L AF EADDAE=LJ=K AF J=D8LAGF LG<8LME D=N=D +)++ ( KD89 D=N=D G> <AFAF?JGGE

+)++

MAC190808RP1V3

Appendix C - Noise Logging Charts

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

5

10

15

20

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00

Wind Speed (m

/s)M

easu

red

Noise

Lev

el, d

BA

Time (End of 15 Minute Sample Interval)

Background Noise Levels Windsor Rd Kellyville Ridge - Friday 2 August 2019

Rain >= 0.5mm LAmax LA1 LA10 LA90 LAeq Mean Wind Speed m/s

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

5

10

15

20

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00

Wind Speed (m

/s)M

easu

red

Noise

Lev

el, d

BA


Background Noise Levels Windsor Rd Kellyville Ridge - Saturday 3 August 2019


40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

5

10

15

20

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00

Wind Speed (m

/s)M

easu

red

Noise

Lev

el, d

BA


Background Noise Levels Windsor Rd Kellyville Ridge - Sunday 4 August 2019


40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

5

10

15

20

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00

Wind Speed (m

/s)M

easu

red

Noise

Lev

el, d

BA


Background Noise Levels Windsor Rd Kellyville Ridge - Monday 5 August 2019


40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

5

10

15

20

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00

Wind Speed (m

/s)M

easu

red

Noise

Lev

el, d

BA


Background Noise Levels Windsor Rd Kellyville Ridge - Tuesday 6 August 2019


40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

5

10

15

20

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00

Wind Speed (m

/s)M

easu

red

Noise

Lev

el, d

BA


Background Noise Levels Windsor Rd Kellyville Ridge - Wednesday 7 August 2019


40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

5

10

15

20

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00

Wind Speed (m

/s)M

easu

red

Noise

Lev

el, d

BA


Background Noise Levels Windsor Rd Kellyville Ridge - Thursday 8 August 2019


40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

5

10

15

20

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00

Wind Speed (m

/s)M

easu

red

Noise

Lev

el, d

BA


Background Noise Levels Windsor Rd Kellyville Ridge - Friday 9 August 2019


40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

5

10

15

20

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00

Wind Speed (m

/s)M

easu

red

Noise

Lev

el, d

BA


Background Noise Levels Windsor Rd Kellyville Ridge - Saturday 10 August 2019


40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

5

10

15

20

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00

Wind Speed (m

/s)M

easu

red

Noise

Lev

el, d

BA


Background Noise Levels Windsor Rd Kellyville Ridge - Sunday 11 August 2019


40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

5

10

15

20

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00

Wind Speed (m

/s)M

easu

red

Noise

Lev

el, d

BA


Background Noise Levels Windsor Rd Kellyville Ridge - Monday 12 August 2019


Muller Acoustic Consulting Pty LtdPO Box 262, Newcastle NSW 2300ABN: 36 602 225 132P: +61 2 4920 1833www.mulleracoustic.com

Date post:	26-Mar-2021
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	1 times
Download:	0 times

Noise Assessment - Blacktown City Council...The project proposes the construction of a new KFC...

Documents