Date post: | 22-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Numerical Investigation of
Mixed Convection in AGRs
ByBy
Amir KeshmiriAmir Keshmiri
Supervisors:Supervisors: Prof. Dominique Laurence and Dr. Mark Cotton Prof. Dominique Laurence and Dr. Mark Cotton
School of Mechanical, Aerospace & Civil Engineering (MACE)School of Mechanical, Aerospace & Civil Engineering (MACE)
The University of ManchesterThe University of Manchester
Internal Seminar at the University of Manchester – 07/11/2007Internal Seminar at the University of Manchester – 07/11/2007
OutlineOutline
• Introduction to AGRs
• Ascending/Descending Flows
• The Geometry Studied
• Some Results
• Conclusions
• Future Work
[http://gt-mhr.ga.com]
[http://www.gen-4.org]
Advanced Gas-Cooled ReactorsAdvanced Gas-Cooled Reactors (AGRs) (AGRs)
[The Safety of the AGR by J M Bowerman (1982)]
Advanced Gas-Cooled ReactorsAdvanced Gas-Cooled Reactors (AGRs) (AGRs)
Advanced Gas-Cooled ReactorsAdvanced Gas-Cooled Reactors (AGRs) (AGRs)
[The Safety of the AGR by J M Bowerman (1982)]
Ascending/Descending Flows; Ascending/Descending Flows; Enhancement/Impairment of Heat TransferEnhancement/Impairment of Heat Transfer
2w
4qgDGr
8.0425.34108
PrReD
DGrBo
UD
D Re
ehD
Nu
pCPr
Solution MethodsSolution Methods
• In-House Code (CONVERT)In-House Code (CONVERT)
• Commercial CFD Package (STAR-CD)Commercial CFD Package (STAR-CD)
• Industrial Code (Code_Saturne)Industrial Code (Code_Saturne)
• or
• Radius=0.1 m
• Ascending Flow
• Constant Heat Flux BC
• ‘Boussinesq’ Approximation
180Reτ 5300ReD
Key Features of the Flow ProblemKey Features of the Flow Problem
The Governing EquationsThe Governing Equations
0)(1
z
W
r
rV
r
Continuity:
zt gTTr
Wr
rr
dz
dpW
zrVW
rr
)0
2
(1)(1
)()(1
Momentum:
r
Tr
rrWT
zrVT
rr t
t )Pr
(1
)()(1
Energy:
The Geometry Used in ‘CONVERT’The Geometry Used in ‘CONVERT’
RUN1=‘approximate turbulent flow’
RUN2=‘fully developed flow’
R Marching
• An in-house Fortran77 Code, ‘CONVERT’ (for Convection in Vertical Tubes)
• Finite Volume/Finite Difference Code
• Parabolic governing equations i.e. Marching problem
RANS ResultsRANS Results
The Turbulence Models Tested by CONVERT :
• Launder-Sharma k-ε model [1]
• Cotton-Ismael k-ε-S model [2]
• Suga NLEVM [3]
The Results are validated against:
• DNS of You et al (2003) [4]
• LS of Kim et al (2006) [5]
The analysis focuses on 4 cases:
• Gr/Re^2=0.000 Forced Convection
• Gr/Re^2=0.063 Early onset Mixed Convection
• Gr/Re^2=0.087 Laminarization
• Gr/Re^2=0.241 Recovery
RANS ResultsRANS Results
Gr/Re^2=0 – Forced ConvectionGr/Re^2=0 – Forced Convection
Gr/Re^2=0 – Forced ConvectionGr/Re^2=0 – Forced Convection
Gr/Re^2=0 – Forced ConvectionGr/Re^2=0 – Forced Convection
Gr/Re^2=0 – Forced ConvectionGr/Re^2=0 – Forced Convection
Gr/Re^2=0.087 – LaminarizationGr/Re^2=0.087 – Laminarization
Gr/Re^2=0.087 – LaminarizationGr/Re^2=0.087 – Laminarization
Gr/Re^2=0.087 – LaminarizationGr/Re^2=0.087 – Laminarization
Gr/Re^2=0.087 – LaminarizationGr/Re^2=0.087 – Laminarization
Budgets of Turbulent Kinetic EnergyBudgets of Turbulent Kinetic Energy
Gr/Re^2=0.087Gr/Re^2=0.087Gr/Re^2=0.0Gr/Re^2=0.0
Heat Transfer Enhancement/ImpairmentHeat Transfer Enhancement/Impairment
Heat Transfer Enhancement/ImpairmentHeat Transfer Enhancement/Impairment
Heat Transfer Enhancement/ImpairmentHeat Transfer Enhancement/Impairment
Nu and Cf DevelopmentsNu and Cf Developments
Nu and Cf DevelopmentsNu and Cf Developments
Effects of Reynolds NumberEffects of Reynolds Number
Effects of Reynolds NumberEffects of Reynolds Number
ConclusionsConclusions
• Mixed convection in an ascending flow in a heated pipe, is a very complex phenomenon, despite its simplicity; Thus requires more research.
• Most of the turbulence models successfully predict the flow field at relatively low heat loading i.e. small Gr/Re^2
• Only very few turbulence models (only Linear k-ε) can predict the Re-laminarization Phenomena.
• There is a close agreement between the results of Code_Saturne and STAR-CD for the tested models.
• The relatively more advanced turbulence models, such as Non-Linear k- of Suga and V2f models are observed to suffer from convergence problems at high Gr/Re^2.
• The few available DNS data are not sufficient to carry out in depth validation of the RANS models, particularly at the maximum heat transfer impairment point.
• Development of Code_Saturne by implementing some advanced wall functions such as Analytical and Numerical Wall Functions.
• Cross examination of Code_Saturne with TEAM and STREAM Codes.
• Testing more complex geometries such as rib roughened surfaces, etc.
Future WorkFuture Work
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements
This work was carried out as part of the TSEC programme KNOO and as such we are grateful
to the EPSRC for funding under grant EP/C549465/1
ReferencesReferences
[1] Launder, B.E. and Sharma, B.I., 1974, “Application of the energy dissipation model of turbulence to the calculation of flow near a spinning disc”, Lett. Heat Mass Transfer, 1, pp. 131-138.
[2] Cotton, M.A., Ismael, J.O., 1998, “A strain parameter turbulence model and its application to homogeneous and thin shear flows”, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 19, pp. 326–337.
[3] Craft, T.J., Launder, B.E. and Suga, K. 1996, “Development and application of a cubic eddy-viscosity model of turbulence”, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 17, pp. 108-115
[4] You, J., Yoo, J.Y. and Choi. H., 2003, “Direct Numerical Simulation of Heated Vertical Air Flows in Fully Developed Turbulent Mixed Convection”, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 46, pp.1613-1627
[5] Kim, W.S., Jackson, J.D. and He, S. (2006), “Computational Investigation into Buoyancy-Aided Turbulent Flow and Heat Transfer to Air in a Vertical Tube”, Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer, 5, (Hanjalić, K., Nagano, Y. and Jakirlic, S. (Editors))
THE ENDTHE ENDTHANK YOUTHANK YOU