Nutrition and Physical Activity
Iowans will enjoy balanced nutrition, lead physically active lives and live in healthy communities
Obesity Trends Among U.S. Adults between 1985 and 2004
Source of the data: The data shown in these maps were collected through CDC’s
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Each year, state health departments use standard procedures to collect data through a series of monthly telephone interviews with U.S. adults.
Prevalence estimates generated for the maps may vary slightly from those generated for the states by BRFSS (http://aps.nccd.cdc.gov/brfss) as slightly different analytic methods are used.
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1985
No Data <10% 10%–14%
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1986
No Data <10% 10%–14%
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1987
No Data <10% 10%–14%
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1988
No Data <10% 10%–14%
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1989
No Data <10% 10%–14%
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1990
No Data <10% 10%–14%
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1991
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19%
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1992
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19%
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1993
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19%
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1994
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19%
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1995
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19%
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1996
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19%
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1997
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% ≥20
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1998
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% ≥20
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1999
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% ≥20
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2000
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% ≥20
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2001
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% ≥25%
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% ≥25%
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2002
Obesity* Trends Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2003
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% ≥25%
Obesity* Trends Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2004
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% ≥25%
(*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
The Epidemic
The prevalence of obesity among Iowa adults has increased by 84% from 1990 to 2004 (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System BRFSS).
The 2004 BRFSS data indicates 37.4% of adult Iowans are overweight, and 23.5% are obese (for a total of 61% of Iowa adults compared to the national average of 59.9%)
Disparities
31% of low-income children between 2 and 5 years of age in Iowa are overweight or at risk of becoming overweight. (CDC PedNSS, 2003)
Overweight and obesity prevalence rises with increasing age in Iowa up to age 64.
Obesity prevalence is highest (28.2%) in those with income less than $15,000.
Ethnicity data not available for Iowa
Obj. 19-2
TotalWhite
FemaleMale
Black Female
MaleMexican American
FemaleMale
2010 Target
National Data on Adult Obesity: 1988-94 to 1999-2000
0 10 20 30 40 50
Note: Data are for ages 20 years and over, age adjusted to the 2000 standard population. Obesity is defined as BMI >= 30.0. Black and white exclude persons of Hispanic origin. Persons of Mexican-American origin may be any race.Source: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, NCHS, CDC.
Percent
1988-94
Children and Adolescents
Childhood obesity
has been declared “the most pressing health concern in the country”
(American Heart Association, American Stroke Association, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2005)
Obesity in children and adolescents
is associated with significant health problems such as high blood cholesterol, high blood pressure, hypertension, diabetes, and depression
(American Academy of Pediatrics, 2003).
If current trends continue
it is estimated that over one-third of the children born in the year 2000 will go on to develop diabetes
(K.M. Venkat Narayan, MD, Chief of the Diabetes Epidemiology Section, Center for Disease Control and Prevention).
Risk of Overweight and Obesity
1 in 4 children is at risk for overweight.
More than 60 percent of young people eat too much fat.
Less than 20 percent of children eat the recommended 5 or more servings of fruits and vegetables each day.
-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2004
Childhood Obesity
Since the 1970s, obesity prevalence has:– Doubled for preschool children aged 2-5 years– Doubled for adolescents aged 12-19 years– Tripled for children aged 6-11 years
More than 9 million children and youth over 6 years are obese
Similar trends in U.S. adults and adults internationally
-IOM, 2004
0
5
10
15
20
0
5
10
15
20Percent
1963-67 1971-74 1976-80 1988-94
Obj. 19-2
Percent
Males 12-19
Females 12-19
National Trends in Child and Adolescent Overweight
Note: Overweight is defined as BMI >= gender- and weight-specific 95th percentile from the2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States. Source: National Health Examination Surveys II (ages 6-11) and III (ages 12-17), NationalHealth and Nutrition Examination Surveys I, II, III and 1999-2000, NCHS, CDC.
1999-20001966-70
Females 6-11
Males 6-11
Prevalence of Overweight Among Children and Adolescents Ages 6-19 Years
0
2
4
6
8
1 0
1 2
1 4
1 6
1 9 6 3 - 7 0 1 9 7 1 - 7 4 1 9 7 6 - 8 0 1 9 8 8 - 9 4 1 9 9 9 - 0 2
A g e s 6 - 1 1A g e s 1 2 - 1 9
-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2004
Obj. 19-3c
Total
FemaleMale
WhiteBlack
MexicanAmerican
0 10 20 30Percent
National Child and Adolescent Overweight by Race:
1988-94 to 1999-2000
Note: Overweight is defined for ages 6-19 years as BMI >= gender- and weight-specific 95th percentile from the 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States Black and white exclude persons of Hispanic origin. Persons of Mexican-American origin may be any race.Source: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, NCHS, CDC.
2010 Target1988-94
Early ChildhoodIowa PedNSS 2003
31% of low-income children 2-5 years of age in Iowa are overweight or at risk of becoming overweight.
Overweight: 13.6% vs. 14.7% U.S.Ever Breastfed: 60% vs. 53.2% U.S.Breastfed 6 months: 27.5% vs. 21.5% U.S.
Prevalence of Overweight of 4th, 5th, and 6th grade youth in the UNI PANARY surveillance project Measured BMI of 2,740 4th – 6th grade
children 60% were in the normal weight zone (70%
U.S.) 20% were in the “at risk for overweight” zone
(16% U.S.) 20% were in the “overweight” zone (15%
U.S.)Joens-Matre, Welk, Russell, Nicklay, & Hensley (2005).
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. May Supplement.
Prevalence of Overweight of 4th, 5th, and 6th grade youth from Urban, Small Cities, and
Rural areas in the PANARY surveillance project Urban
Small Cities
Rural
Normal weight 62.8% 62.9% 53.1%
At-Risk for Overweight
17.8% 19.5% 21.8%
Overweight 19.4% 17.6% 25.1%(Joens-Matre, Welk, Russell, Nicklay, & Hensley, 2005)
Iowa 2003-Consumption of Fruits and Vegetables
Consume 5 or more servings per day17% of Iowa adults 23.6% of older adults 19% of adults with income < $15,00011.3% of adults without a HS/GED
degree22% of US adults
National Proportion of Vegetable Servings
1999-2000
Obj. 19-6Note: Data are age adjusted to the 2000 standard population for adults 20 years and over.Source: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, NCHS, CDC.
Children 2-19 years Adults 20 years and over
Dark green/ orange
8%
Tomatoes9%
Legumes6% All others
22%
Other potatoes
10%
Fried potatoes
46%
Dark green/ orange
11%
Tomatoes11%
Legumes8%
All others35%
Other potatoes
13%
Fried potatoes
22%
Target = At least 1/3 dark green/orange
0
1
2
3
4
Average number of servings
Objs. 19-5 19-6
Fruits and Vegetables: U.S. Average Number of Daily Servings by Race:
1999-2000Minimum Recommended
Note: Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 standard population for ages 2 years and over. Black and white exclude persons of Hispanic origin. Persons of Mexican-American origin may be any race.Source: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, NCHS, CDC.
Fruits Vegetables
Total White Black Mexican American
0Age-adjusted percent
2010Target
30 4010 20
19992002
50
Obj. 22-2
Moderate Physical Activity for U.S. Adults by Race/Ethnicity
Note: Data are for ages 18 years and over, age adjusted to the 2000 standard population. Moderate physical activity is regular leisure-time physical activity (moderate activity 30+ minutes/5+ times a week or vigorous activity 20+ minutes/3+ times a week). American Indian includes Alaska Native. Black and white exclude persons of Hispanic origin. Persons of Hispanic origin may be any race. I = 95% confidence interval.Source: National Health Interview Survey, NCHS, CDC.
White
American Indian
Hispanic
Asian
Black
Iowa 2003-Meet the recommended amount of physical activity
43% of Iowa adults (Men- 45%; Women- 42%)
32% of older adults 38% of adults with income < $15,000 36% of adults without a HS/GED degree 47% of U.S. adults meet the
recommended amount of physical activity
0
20
40
60
80
100
Vigorous Physical Activity for U. S. Adolescents by Grade Level: 2001
11th10th
Obj. 22-7
9th
Percent
12thNote: Vigorous physical activity is activity that made students in grades 9-12 sweat or breathe hard for 20+ minutes on 3+ of the past 7 days. I = 95% confidence interval.Source: Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System, NCCDPHP, CDC.
Benefits of Proper Nutrition and Physical Activity
Increased bone density Enhanced cardiac wellness Longer-term reductions in weight and cholesterol
levels Improvements in body composition Lower risk for many chronic diseases Support of child growth and development Improved grades in school Decreased incidents of tobacco and alcohol use
-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2004
Cost of Overweight Today’s children will be the first generation in
memory to have a shorter life span than their parents. - Sir John Krebs, Chairman of the United Kingdom’s Food Standards agency
Iowans pay $783 million in health care costs for problems associated with obesity - ~17% is covered by Medicaid & Medicare (Finkelstein, Fiebelkorn, & Wang, 2004)
Overweight children report lower quality of life than children with cancer.
Promoting Nutrition & Physical Promoting Nutrition & Physical ActivityActivity
CDC Planning Grant
CDC’s Charge
Write a comprehensive state plan, involving a wide range of community partners
Describe the plan in terms of the social-ecological model
Base plan on science-based interventions or promising interventions
Scope of Activities
Conduct Community Forums Visit with professionals at conferences &
meetings Invite partners to a Kick Off Summit to begin
process of writing a plan Form Channel Work Groups to write portions
of the plan
Iowans Fit for Life Work Groups
Early Childhood Educational Settings Older Iowans Health Care Community Business and Agriculture
Comprehensive State Plan Goals
Prevent and reduce the level of obesity in Iowans through improved nutrition, physical activity and supportive environments.
Reduce obesity through integration, coordination, and collaboration among organizations and entities that share expertise and maximize resources of existing programs and partnerships.
Social-Ecological Model
Socio-Ecologic Model
Source: Adapted from McLeroy, et al., An ecological perspective on health promotion programs.Health Education Quarterly 1988; 15:351-77.
knowledge, attitudes, skills
family, friends, social networks
organizations, social institutions
relationships among organizations
Public Policy
Community
Organizational
Interpersonal
Individual
national, state, local lawsHealthy Policy
Target Audience
Policy Environmental Support
Venue for Message Delivery
ChildHealthy lifestyles modeled in homeAll children have access to healthy foods, physical activity and a nurturing environment
Alternatives to TVAfter school programsSchool meals
Schools & child careMediaWIC
Individual Level of the Social Ecological Model
Other Target Audiences: Adolescents, young adults, middle aged, elderly, persons with disabilities
Behavior Change Strategies
Increase breastfeeding initiation and duration Reduce TV viewing Increase physical activity Increase fruit and vegetable consumption Other dietary changes such as decreasing
soft drink intake or reducing portion sizes Increase parental involvement, but not
parental control
Child Care and Afterschool Settings: The Perfect Venue to Promote Healthy Lifestyles
Dietary behaviors and habits of physical activity have their origins in early childhood.
Child care serves many of the specific groups of children—minorities and those in poverty—most at risk for being overweight.
School-age children are likely to be sedentary in the afterschool hours if not given active options.
Providers act as liaisons to parents who make critical nutrition and fitness decisions for their children.
Strategies to Promote Nutrition and Physical Activity
Program
Policy
Funding
Program Strategies
Games and Activities
Curricula and Lesson Plans
Engaging Parents
Policy Strategies
Develop physical activity and nutrition guidelines for child care and afterschool programs
Provide physical activity and nutrition training for child care and afterschool providers
Help child care and afterschool programs access food nutrition entitlement programs
Creative Finance Strategies
Make better use of existing resources
Create more flexibility in existing categorical funding
Build public-private partnerships
Today’s Activity
Identify potential partners.
Identify potential resources.
Identify existing efforts that relate to the focus areas of nutrition, physical activity, breastfeeding, and/or screen time.