+ All Categories
Home > Documents > OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES PEAK PERFORMANCE 2.0 … · 2015. 6. 22. · Meets or exceeds standard...

OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES PEAK PERFORMANCE 2.0 … · 2015. 6. 22. · Meets or exceeds standard...

Date post: 03-Sep-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
21
OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES (OHR) PEAK PERFORMANCE 2.0 REVIEW MAY 21, 2014 2013 PERFORMANCE REVIEW 2014 INNOVATION PLANNING
Transcript
Page 1: OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES PEAK PERFORMANCE 2.0 … · 2015. 6. 22. · Meets or exceeds standard Within 10% of standard Not meeting standard Making positive progress Making negative

OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES (OHR) PEAK PERFORMANCE 2.0 REVIEW

MAY 21, 2014 2013 PERFORMANCE REVIEW

2014 INNOVATION PLANNING

Page 2: OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES PEAK PERFORMANCE 2.0 … · 2015. 6. 22. · Meets or exceeds standard Within 10% of standard Not meeting standard Making positive progress Making negative

OHR Strategic Plan

• Responsive Customer Service • Collaborative Partnerships • Innovative Recruiting Practices

ELEVATING SERVICE Deliver invaluable HR support that positively impacts business results

• Refocus Learning & Organizational Development

CULTIVATING LEADERSHIP Establish the City & County of Denver as a progressive learning organization focused on employee and leadership development

• Making Wellbeing a Part of Everyday Lives

• Identify People/Process Barriers • HR Growth & Professionalism

MAINTAINING A HEALTH WORKPLACE CULTURE

Set the standard practice that provides for employee well-being, performance, and

engagement

Presenter
Presentation Notes
OHR’s Strategic Plan – Three overarching goals and specific strategies related to each goal.
Page 3: OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES PEAK PERFORMANCE 2.0 … · 2015. 6. 22. · Meets or exceeds standard Within 10% of standard Not meeting standard Making positive progress Making negative

Accomplishments & Challenges

• Development of customer service policy & metrics • Implementation of on-boarding innovations • Connection of internships to succession planning • Development of staffing plans for client groups

ELEVATING SERVICE: 12 of 16 requirements

accomplished

• Implement e-learning and leadership development strategy

• Internal coaching, leadership training, and organizational development

CULTIVATING LEADERSHIP: 4 of 5 requirements

accomplished

• Further support of citywide Wellness • Development of OHR employee recognition program • Continuous improvement and evaluation in HR • Merit system review

MAINTAINING A HEALTH WORKPLACE CULTURE: 11 of 15 requirements

accomplished

Presenter
Presentation Notes
What was accomplished in 2013, followed by what OHR needs to focus on in 2014 and 2015.
Page 4: OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES PEAK PERFORMANCE 2.0 … · 2015. 6. 22. · Meets or exceeds standard Within 10% of standard Not meeting standard Making positive progress Making negative

Accomplishments & Challenges

2013 OHR Accomplishments (Highlights): • Developed a leadership competency model and implemented

leadership development programs in DHS, PW, and DIA. • Launched City University and introduced computer-based learning

programs to city employees through the introduction of Skillsoft. • Increased enrollment in the lower premium health plans by 70%, which

will deliver $1300 to $7700 in premium savings to employees in 2014. • Implemented a new external EAP, offering 24 hour access and face-to-

face counseling for all City Employees. • Completed the 2013 Denver Engagement Survey and delivered

customized results to clients.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Highlights of 2013 accomplishments: Categories: leadership development and training, benefits/wellness, community support, and client support
Page 5: OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES PEAK PERFORMANCE 2.0 … · 2015. 6. 22. · Meets or exceeds standard Within 10% of standard Not meeting standard Making positive progress Making negative

Accomplishments & Challenges

2013 OHR Accomplishments (Highlights): • Provided HR support to Summer Scholars by conducting organizational

assessments and developing strategies to address staffing, compensation, and on-boarding needs.

• Developed the P.A.T.H.S. program, which provided job skills to 30 individuals; nine individuals received employment and four individuals received trainee opportunities within the city.

• Facilitated 48 Road to Excellence meetings within PW, gathering employee perceptions of supervision and management and suggestions for improvements to HR processes.

• Processed 563 unemployment claims, saving the City over $1,073,625. • Received and processed 88,000 job applications and filled 1,500

vacancies citywide.

Page 6: OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES PEAK PERFORMANCE 2.0 … · 2015. 6. 22. · Meets or exceeds standard Within 10% of standard Not meeting standard Making positive progress Making negative

Mission-Level Metrics

2014 YTD Performance Measure Progress 2013 Standard

Set By Standard 6.6%/ 3.3%

Turnover: Agency/ City

10.0%/ 10.6% OHR

10.2%/ 11.0%

16.8 Days Talent Acquisition:

Average Time to Refer Eligibility List 27 Days OHR 25 Days

N/A Classification/Compensation: Satisfaction with Job Audits 80% OHR 4.0/5.0

400 Benefits/Wellness:

Wellness Incentive Program Participants N/A OHR 3800 EEs

4.7 Employee Training:

Satisfaction with OHR training programs 4.7 OHR 4.8/5.0

4.13 HR Service Teams:

Satisfaction with service delivery 4.13 OHR 4.0/5.0

Meets or exceeds standard

Within 10% of standard

Not meeting standard

Making positive progress

Making negative progress

Status Colors: Progress Arrows:

Presenter
Presentation Notes
OHR is in good shape when reviewing 2014 YTD performance against OHR’s mission-level metrics. New metric to be established for 2014 in Classification/Compensation as a result of the new customer experience survey that will be rolled out in 2014. Benefits/Wellness is currently a concern. Wellness program is a high priority for the agency in 2014. While the participant count is low, it only reflects data from one of the three carriers. Will be spending the summer and fall working on communications and outreach to employees to drive up participation. Trending up on all other mission-level metrics.
Page 7: OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES PEAK PERFORMANCE 2.0 … · 2015. 6. 22. · Meets or exceeds standard Within 10% of standard Not meeting standard Making positive progress Making negative

2014 OHR Priorities

• Launch employee education and communications on 2015 benefit plan design changes and 2014/2015 wellness initiative.

• Discuss, develop, and implement revisions to Career Service Rules 9

and 13. • Develop e-learning and leadership development strategies. Identify

and allocate appropriate resources to OHR teams to implement strategies.

• Create and launch all required training on City University. • Create and staff a centralized leave administration team.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
2014 priorities support OHR’s strategic plan and new service delivery model (currently in year two of new model). Career Service Rule 9 & 13 – first step in OHR’s review of the city’s merit system e-learning & leadership development – working to develop a long term strategy and solutions for learning. Need to decide what can come in-house and what can be handled through existing contract with Right Management. City University – training to be created is required to pass probation; will provide employees with an alternative to classroom training. Centralized leave administration team – right now, each service team handles its own leave administration. A centralized team will provide consistent application of advice and procedures; allow the team to track trends and mitigation strategies; and create a cleaner connection to Interactive Process (IAP).
Page 8: OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES PEAK PERFORMANCE 2.0 … · 2015. 6. 22. · Meets or exceeds standard Within 10% of standard Not meeting standard Making positive progress Making negative

2014 OHR Priorities

• Implement new Service Team to support DSD

• Implement new process and on-boarding system in NeoGov. • Implement new process and scanning system for employee records. • Initiate RFP for a background check vendor and make selection for

new provider. Review and implement changes to internal background check processes.

• Create and launch new metrics/reports for HR analytics. • Add a tool to capture OHR customer experience data for transactions

and projects.

• Implement new investigation process (based upon RIE)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
DSD Service Team – currently in assessment phase; should have preliminary recommendations in next 30 days. On-boarding system – phased roll out; expect full implementation by Q2 of 2015. Background checks – includes a review of internal process; creation of a pre-employment decision grid. HR Metrics – directly support needs of clients and service teams. OHR customer experience – further enhance OHR’s ability to collect client feedback. Investigations RIE – new processes and tools; pilot to follow with full implementation.
Page 9: OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES PEAK PERFORMANCE 2.0 … · 2015. 6. 22. · Meets or exceeds standard Within 10% of standard Not meeting standard Making positive progress Making negative

Opportunity Analysis

- Required training on City U

- Leave admin team - DSD service team - On-boarding

system

- 2015 benefit plan design changes

- Merit Review (CS Rules)

- e-learning & leadership development

- Investigations - Metrics/reports

for HR analytics - OHR Customer

Experience

- Scanning system for employee records

- Background checks

Payoff

Priority

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Simplified Opportunity Analysis Model – Priority and Payoff High priority/high payoff – long term cost savings, better support of organization’s ability to attract and retain talent; new initiatives. Tied directly to 2015 budget requests. High priority/low payoff – currently in implementation phase; addresses specific operational challenges Low priority/high or low payoff - tweaks to service delivery; projects currently in implementation phase
Page 10: OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES PEAK PERFORMANCE 2.0 … · 2015. 6. 22. · Meets or exceeds standard Within 10% of standard Not meeting standard Making positive progress Making negative

Innovation Plan

Innovate!

Innovation Fund $

• JDIs – Just Do Its

• RIEs – Rapid Improvement Events

• Projects – Larger scope, usu. Multi-agency

• New/Updated Technology

• Strategic Resource Alignments (SRA’s)

People

TechnologyProcess

Completed Innovations • Core value streams: 3 • JDIs: 6

• Disciplinary letter revision • ½ Day New Employee Orientation • Consolidation of Rules, Sexual Harassment and

Employment Law training • General Services User ID training • Workspace Innovation – P&R and DIA • Consolidated Grievance and Complaint forms

• RIEs: 5 • Investigations • On-boarding • Abolish/Create position process (DIA) • Election Judge Hiring (Joint with C&R) • “Mini” RIE resulted Straight to Fill Positions, New

Positions, or Abolish & Create no longer require sign off from Finance (DIA)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The three core value streams identified by agency leadership�1. Total Compensation Performance Management Recruitment Value Stream Analysis (VSA) completed for Performance Management. From that identified Investigations RIE, Disciplinary letter JDI and Records Management RIE (scheduled for mid 2014) Additional JDIs: training consolidation, assignment of user Ids and passwords to general services staff and training required for individuals not accustomed to computers and their corresponding programs. OHR P&R service team modified work space to increase efficiency (modified size of all work spaces and made designated copy center). Additional RIES: On-boarding which is also a project with approved funding from the Ifund. OHR partnered with C&R on election Judge Hiring.
Page 11: OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES PEAK PERFORMANCE 2.0 … · 2015. 6. 22. · Meets or exceeds standard Within 10% of standard Not meeting standard Making positive progress Making negative

Innovation Plan (continued)

Innovate!

Innovation Fund $

• JDIs – Just Do Its

• RIEs – Rapid Improvement Events

• Projects – Larger scope, usu. Multi-agency

• New/Updated Technology

• Strategic Resource Alignments (SRA’s)

People

TechnologyProcess

Black Belt/Green Belt Trainings: • Black Belts certified: 12

• Assisted other agencies with various innovations • OHR Green Belts certified: 13 • OHR Facilitated Green Belt trainings: 10,

approximately 120 participants

On-going Innovations: • Projects: NeoGov On-boarding (Innovation Fund $)

Planned Innovations:

• Records Management RIE • Continue facilitating monthly Green Belt training • Talent Acquisition RIE

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The three core value streams identified by agency leadership�1. Total Compensation Performance Management Recruitment Value Stream Analysis (VSA) completed for Performance Management. From that identified Investigations RIE, Disciplinary letter JDI and Records Management RIE (scheduled for mid 2014) Additional JDIs: training consolidation, assignment of user Ids and passwords to general services staff and training required for individuals not accustomed to computers and their corresponding programs. OHR P&R service team modified work space to increase efficiency (modified size of all work spaces and made designated copy center). Additional RIES: On-boarding which is also a project with approved funding from the Ifund. OHR partnered with C&R on election Judge Hiring.
Page 12: OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES PEAK PERFORMANCE 2.0 … · 2015. 6. 22. · Meets or exceeds standard Within 10% of standard Not meeting standard Making positive progress Making negative

Investigations RIE

Financial • Soft $: $52,335

Service Level Improvements • Revised Complaint/Grievance form into one form • Improved metrics with standardized database • More consistent procedures and documentation • More customer-friendly process • Better up-front assessment • Created training aids • Established timelines • Reduced HR Professional time on investigations

Human Development • Created consistency for all HR generalists. • Investigations categorized into low, medium & complex • Investigations will average 7, 14 & 21 days depending

on complexity

Track

ing

the

Inno

vatio

ns

Financial

Hard $ Savings(budget impact)

Soft $ Savings

HumanDevelopment

Service LevelImprovements

Presenter
Presentation Notes
 In 2013 a Rapid Improvement Event (RIE) was held to conduct an intensive, in-depth review of the personnel investigation process used throughout the City.  Overall, this RIE resulted in identified improvements of 64% which represents $52k in soft dollar savings each year.  Highlights:    Initial State Future State All investigations use the same approach Investigations are categorized into complex, medium and low Investigations take an average of 40 days to complete Investigations will average 28 days, 14 days, and 7 days, depending on complexity Two forms are currently in use, one for grievances and one for complaints of harassment or discrimination A single form will be used that allows employees to identify grievances and/or complaints
Page 13: OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES PEAK PERFORMANCE 2.0 … · 2015. 6. 22. · Meets or exceeds standard Within 10% of standard Not meeting standard Making positive progress Making negative

On-boarding RIE

Financial • Soft $: Reduce current costs of $1.7 Million

Service Level Improvements • Establish single workflow process across departments • Reduce on-boarding time – employees fully provisioned

on day one • Reduce business days to on-board from 30 to 10 (verbal

offer to closed TS ticket) • Reduce days employee ID created from 3 to 1 • Reduce errors in new hire paperwork from 43% to 5%

Human Development • Online forms completion by employees and managers • Access to forms by any department

Track

ing

the

Inno

vatio

ns

Financial

Hard $ Savings(budget impact)

Soft $ Savings

HumanDevelopment

Service LevelImprovements

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The on-boarding RIE resulted in the on-boarding Project, which was presented to the Innovation Fund in August 2013. Ifund awarded OHR funding to implement the Neogov Onboard module to existing Neogov recruiting system.
Page 14: OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES PEAK PERFORMANCE 2.0 … · 2015. 6. 22. · Meets or exceeds standard Within 10% of standard Not meeting standard Making positive progress Making negative

DIA Abolish/Create RIE

Financial • Soft $: reduced cost from $156 to $113 for each

abolish/create position requisition.

Service Level Improvements • Reduced number of signatures required from 7 to 3 • Reduced the approval time from upwards of 13 days to

5 or less.

Human Development • Online forms completion by employees and managers • Access to forms by any department Tra

ckin

g th

e In

nova

tions

Financial

Hard $ Savings(budget impact)

Soft $ Savings

HumanDevelopment

Service LevelImprovements

Presenter
Presentation Notes
In collaboration with DIA’s Peak Team, we completed a Rapid Improvement Event (RIE) for the abolish/create position requisition process in 2013.  The current abolish/create position process requires 7 signatures, numerous attachments, and takes 10 to 13 days to acquire all approvals prior to recruitment of a position at a cost of $156.00 each.  The RIE resulted in three signatures for most abolish/create requisitions with a target of 5 days or less for approval, at a cost of $113.00 each.  This is approximately a 30% reduction
Page 15: OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES PEAK PERFORMANCE 2.0 … · 2015. 6. 22. · Meets or exceeds standard Within 10% of standard Not meeting standard Making positive progress Making negative

Sustainability Update: Mobility

Resource Investment

Projected Contribution to Meeting 2020 Goals

Key Assumptions

Upcoming Benchmarks and Status

• N/A

• Continue offering bus pass at a significantly subsidized rate

• Explore offering other incentives like telecommuting policies, free bus passes or car pool incentives

• Currently 68% of employees almost always commute in single occupancy vehicles

• Provide incentives and other programs to City employees so that no more than 55% of these employees commute in single-occupant vehicles

Comments: • OHR has one staff member assigned to issuing bus passes, but no further resource investment.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Key assumption is based on a question asked of employees in 2013 Denver Employee Survey. Ability to explore additional incentives is tied directly to 2015 budget request for additional benefits staff. Additional resources will assist with research and development of subsequent recommendations.
Page 16: OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES PEAK PERFORMANCE 2.0 … · 2015. 6. 22. · Meets or exceeds standard Within 10% of standard Not meeting standard Making positive progress Making negative

Sustainability Update: Workforce

Resource Investment

Projected Contribution to Meeting 2020 Goals

Key Assumptions

Upcoming Benchmarks and Status

• N/A

• Continue to build partnerships with local colleges and universities

• Utilize targeted job fairs and websites to attract candidates

• Continue to allow for relocation premiums under Career Service Rule 9

• Continue offering bus pass at a significantly subsidized rate

• Currently, 90% of applications for city jobs come from within Colorado Front Range

• Provide workforce training and mobility improvements that allow the City government to fill at least 95% of job openings with workers located within a 90-minutes public transit commute of their place of employment

Comments: • Most major metropolitan areas along the Colorado Front Range (Denver, Boulder, Fort Collins,

and Colorado Springs) are within 90 minutes of Downtown Denver. • OHR has multiple staff members assigned to building partnerships with schools and attending

job fairs. No additional resources needed at this time.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Key assumptions based on 2012 recruitment data. Need to review annual numbers for new hires to confirm progress towards benchmark.
Page 17: OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES PEAK PERFORMANCE 2.0 … · 2015. 6. 22. · Meets or exceeds standard Within 10% of standard Not meeting standard Making positive progress Making negative

mean score: 4.38 (of 5.00)

mean score: 4.13 (of 5.00)

Invaluable HRSDTeams

Invaluable OHR-

Executive Director

service model

improving client

outcomes

2013 OHR Customer Experience Findings from Client Executive Feedback [44.2% participation rate of N = 151; fielding: 10-31Jan2014]

A customer experience management program is multi-faceted. This measurement phase focused on feedback from executive-function employees from across the City regarding the OHR-HR Service Delivery Teams and the OHR-Executive Director. But, even in these insights below, we see how HR Support Teams also can collaborate for an improved customer experience for our clients.

strategic and tactical planning

for client requirements

urgency

adequate support for

client outcomes

Nita’s leadership style is

supportive asset to executive relationship

Both “Invaluable service from OHR-Executive Director” and “Invaluable service from HR Service Delivery Teams” are rated favorably, neither driving the other but linked by: “With the redesigned service

model, OHR is effective in measurably improving my agency's business results/ outcomes.”

Ethnic Minority

high interaction

low wf FML

Ethnic Minority

high interaction

Ethnic Minority

Drivers of HR Service Delivery Teams being “invaluable”: "Demonstrates the competence to integrate strategic and tactical

planning to meet my agency's business requirements.“ "Delivers an adequate level of support that measurably improves my

agency’s business results/outcomes.“ "Acts with a sense of urgency.“ [also the lowest-scoring attribute]

Certain characteristics of the respondents or of the workforces they lead

were explored (demog-/ergographics, role, interaction, and workforce size, engagement, quit turnover, and FML rates).

A few were found to be associated with significantly[@ 90% CL] higher scores.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
2013 OHR Customer Experience Mean score for service teams – 4.13 (out of 5) Mean score for executive director – 4.38 (out of 5) Main take aways: Changes in service delivery model have improved our ability to provide invaluable customer service Both service teams and executive director support are important to providing invaluable service One variable (e.g. strong executive director) does not out-weigh the other variable – both are important As an aside – it is crucial that we are able to find a new executive director that will support the service delivery model in order to continue with improvements Most important drivers: (#1) Level of interaction in strategic and tactical planning for clients (#2) Level of support that improved client’s business results/outcomes (again a high level of interaction with HR positively drives this outcome) Future analysis will allow us to better track the influence of other services, e.g.: Engagement HR transactions (labor-admin module of PeopleSoft) Mission level metrics for clients Performance ratings Potential – future analysis will allow OHR to better track future staffing needs (#3) Sense of urgency FML case load impacts the client’s perception of sense of urgency exhibited by service team (lower FML volume, higher perception of sense of urgency) New leave administration team will impact this result Transaction survey will allow us to better track progress on #2 and #3 drivers Other results: Workforce size did not have an impact on “invaluable service” Analytics team applied demographics (e.g. gender, race/ethnicity) and found that race/ethnicity does have a noticeable impact on the results, but not sure what that impact would be (additional analysis needed in the future)   City’s Customer Experience Initiative Created a customer experience survey to capture both internal and external perception of service, from employees Will be supporting initiative through the launch of appropriate training through City University and inclusion of appropriate standards in PEPRs
Page 18: OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES PEAK PERFORMANCE 2.0 … · 2015. 6. 22. · Meets or exceeds standard Within 10% of standard Not meeting standard Making positive progress Making negative

Employee Engagement

OHR Employee Engagement Index Scores

DES11: 26.6 = 30.7 –4.1 DES13: 10.5 = 16.0 –5.5

Causes/Co-incidents of plunging score: • Implementation of new service delivery

model

Driver Areas for Improvement Tactics Leadership Development • 2013 OHR Leadership retreats

• Leadership assessments • Senior Leadership[those that report to your Department Head/Appointee] are present and visible

Appreciation, Worthwhile Labor • Implement OHR employee recognition program in 2014

• Support innovations geared at reducing inefficiencies in our processes and procedures

• Provide tools and technology for OHR staff

• At work, I feel like I make a difference • [OHR-specific] OHR does a good job of recognizing the

"above and beyond" work of its employees • In the last 6 months, I have experienced work-related

burnout Service Model • Maintain new service delivery model

• Enhance the collection of customer experience feedback

• Our new HR model allows for OHR to serve clients better • Policies and programs promote diversity in the workplace

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Engagement index decreased – most likely related to implementation of new service delivery model.
Page 19: OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES PEAK PERFORMANCE 2.0 … · 2015. 6. 22. · Meets or exceeds standard Within 10% of standard Not meeting standard Making positive progress Making negative

Succession Planning

Other Vulnerabilities—and Succession Planning Efforts to Address Them: • Internal talent management assessments - identifying future leaders within

OHR • Review of upcoming retirements – planning for how to fill on those

vacancies • Minimize impact of retirements on single incumbent functions

• Providing training and development opportunities to OHR staff • Individual development plans • Job shadowing activities

A Provocation for considering Succession Planning: Retirement Eligibility • Over a fifth of the 1Jan2014 OHR workforce will be eligible for

retirement before 1Jan2019 (5-year projection). • Specifically, the HR Support Division is more vulnerable:

nearly 28%.

Page 20: OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES PEAK PERFORMANCE 2.0 … · 2015. 6. 22. · Meets or exceeds standard Within 10% of standard Not meeting standard Making positive progress Making negative

Progress on Minority & Women Owned Business

• Currently in compliance with Construction Empowerment Initiative, in that: – OHR is not responsible for construction and design services

• For current contractors/consultants, OHR will collect and report information on diversity and inclusivity efforts to the Office of Economic Development (OED), as required.

• For future RFP’s, OHR will request information for bidding organizations on their diversity and inclusivity efforts. – Will work with General Services’ Purchasing Division and OED’s Division

of Small Business Opportunity to capture and evaluate any information collected from bidding organizations.

Page 21: OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES PEAK PERFORMANCE 2.0 … · 2015. 6. 22. · Meets or exceeds standard Within 10% of standard Not meeting standard Making positive progress Making negative

On the Horizon

• OHR Employee Engagement: – Design and launch an employee recognition program for OHR – OHR succession planning, staff and leadership development

• Customer Experience:

– Finalize design and launch of customer experience survey tool for transactions/projects

– Support for City’s Customer Experience Initiative

• Continuous Improvement and Evaluation: – Implement and evaluate Investigations RIE – Staff Leave Administration team; create policies and procedures;

implement a technology solution – Evaluate resource allocation for training and organizational development – Evaluate the feasibility of offering work life programs (education and

wellness)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
2014 Innovation/Performance Management Efforts

Recommended